Recurrent pelvic prolapse after pelvic organ prolapse suspension (POPS): Analysis and treatment of an emerging clinical issue.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate pelvic organ prolapse (POP) after a novel abdominal prosthetic surgical technique - 'pelvic organ prolapse suspension' (POPS) - that has been proposed recently as an easily reproducible laparoscopic technique for the treatment of multicompartmental POP and rectal prolapse. This study also aimed to analyse treatment strategies of recurrent POP after POPS, reporting on anatomical, subjective and functional outcomes following recurrence surgery. METHODS: Patients with a symptomatic prolapse relapse after POPS were collected and analysed prospectively at a single tertiary care institution. Each patient was offered a multidisciplinary clinical and radiological evaluation pre-operatively. RESULTS: Twenty-five women with a median age of 59 [interquartile range (IQR) 49-73] years were enrolled in the study. Of these, 88 % were menopausal. All patients had high-grade (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage > 2) recurrent posterior vaginal wall-predominant prolapse after POPS. Multicompartmental prolapse was found in 64 % of patients. All women complained of vaginal bulging associated with obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS) symptoms. Surgical treatment consisted of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (VR) in all 25 cases (100 %), and concomitant sacral colpopexy (SCP) with previous mesh removal in 16 cases (64 %). No anatomical recurrences were observed after median follow-up of 12 (IQR 3-18) months. Overall subjective improvement after surgery was high in all patients (Patient Global Improvement Index ≤ 2). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent POP following POPS appears to predominantly involve the posterior vaginal wall, with associated ODS symptoms. A multidisciplinary approach is advisable for treatment of these patients. Minimally invasive VR alone or in combination with SCP seems to represent an effective treatment.

Retrorectal Hernia: A Rare Cause of Constipation Diagnosed on Magnetic Resonance (MR) Defecography.

Retrorectal herniation of the sigmoid colon is a rare condition characterized by the protrusion of a segment of the colon into the pre-sacral space and posterior to the rectum. This herniation occurs through a defect in the peritoneum, which may have developed secondary to congenital mechanisms, surgery, trauma, or inflammatory processes. Here, a case of retrorectal herniation of the sigmoid colon in an elderly female patient presenting with constipation is reported, with a review of the literature.

Literature review, surgical decision making algorithm, and AGREE II-S comparison of national and international recommendations and guidelines in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

The average lifespan has increased over time due to improvements in quality of life, leading to an aging population that stays healthy for longer. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), whether uterine or vaginal, is a problem that severely impairs quality of life and imposes significant restrictions. The present study provides the reader with a summary of the many surgical techniques used in POP surgery, comparing international guidelines, offering an algorithm that is simple to understand, and allows the reader to quickly choose the table that includes the best surgical therapy for each individual. Using relevant keywords, the writers searched the PubMed and Scopus databases for relevant publications from 2000 to April 2023. Studies with cases of oncologic disorders or prior hysterectomy performed for another reason were not included in the analysis. Ten distinct international guidelines are highlighted and examined in the present study. We used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II-S (AGREE II-S) method to assess their quality, and incorporated the results into the conclusion. Worldwide, anterior colporrhaphy is the preferred method of treating anterior compartment abnormalities, and mesh is virtually always used when recurrence occurs (which happens in about half of the cases). Worldwide, posterior colporrhaphy is commonly used to repair posterior compartment abnormalities. Only a few national guidelines (the Iranian guideline, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica [AOGS], and the German-speaking countries) permit the use of mesh or xenograft in cases of recurrence. There is agreement on the abdominal approach (sacrocolpopexy) with mesh for treating apical deformities. Sacrospinous-hysteropexy is the standard method used to guide the vaginal approach; mesh is typically used to aid in this process. There are just three recommendations that do not include vaginal operations: HSE, AOGS, and Iran. Of obliteration techniques, colpocleisis is unquestionably the best. In conclusion, our analysis highlights the significance of customized methods in POP surgery, taking into account the requirements and preferences of each patient. To choose the best surgical therapy, criteria and patient features must be carefully considered.

Resolution of symptoms of rectal prolapse after repair of vaginal prolapse: A report of two cases.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a very common problem that can affect any aspect of the pelvic floor. Often, vaginal and rectal prolapse occur simultaneously. Prior case reports have suggested resolution of symptoms of rectal prolapse in those with concomitant rectal and vaginal prolapse; however, the overall body of evidence is limited. We present the cases of two patients who had complete resolution of their symptoms of rectal prolapse after repair of a concomitant vaginal prolapse. Both patients underwent a traditional rectocele repair and perineoplasty, and subsequently reported complete resolution of their symptoms of rectal prolapse, which persisted at their six-month post-operative visits. The second patient ultimately canceled a previously scheduled rectopexy with colorectal surgery. Perhaps a rectocele repair with perineoplasty is limiting rectal mobility, and therefore eliminating its ability to prolapse or intussuscept and cause bothersome symptoms. We suggest that those with concomitant vaginal and rectal prolapse desiring corrective surgery first undergo a less invasive vaginal repair. Post-operative re-evaluation of the symptoms rectal prolapse might then demonstrate that a more invasive rectal prolapse repair, which may involve a colon resection and prolonged hospital stay, was not in fact needed. Further prospective and randomized study is needed to determine the long-term outcomes of concomitant rectal and vaginal prolapse in those who first undergo a vaginal repair.

Trends in Urogynecology-Transvaginal Mesh Surgery in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse constitutes a prevalent condition associated with a considerable impact on the quality of life. The utilization of transvaginal mesh surgery for managing POP has been a subject of extensive debate. Globally, trends in TVM surgery experienced significant shifts subsequent to warnings issued by the FDA. METHODS: This study aims to explore temporal patterns in transvaginal mesh surgery in the German healthcare system. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on in-patient data from the German Federal Statistical Office spanning 2006 to 2021. A total of 1,150,811 operations, each associated with specific codes, were incorporated into the study. Linear regression analysis was employed to delineate discernible trends. RESULTS: The trends in transvaginal mesh surgery within the anterior compartment exhibited relative stability (p = 0.147); however, a significant decline was noted in all other compartments (posterior: p < 0.001, enterocele surgery: p < 0.001). A subtle increasing trend was observed for uterine-preserving transvaginal mesh surgery (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Surgical trends over the specified timeframe demonstrate how POP management has evolved globally. Notably, despite observed fluctuations, transvaginal mesh surgery remains a viable option, particularly for specific cases with a high risk of relapse and contraindications to alternative surgical approaches.

Síndrome genitourinario de la menopausia en mujeres del policlínico universitario Dr. Cosme Ordoñez EECarceller, Cuba / Genitourinary syndrome in women at the Dr. Cosme Ordoñez Carceller university polyclinic, Cuba

Resumen Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia e intensidad del síndrome genitourinario de la menopausia en las mujeres atendidas en la consulta de climaterio y menopausia del Policlínico Universitario "Dr. Cosme Ordoñez Carceller. Materiales y métodos: Investigación tipo observacional, descriptiva y transversal, realizada en el período comprendido entre enero 2018 y diciembre de 2022. El universo de trabajo quedó constituido por 2962 mujeres de edad mediana del policlínico universitario Dr. Cosme Ordoñez Carceller. La muestra fue de 353 mujeres seleccionada mediante un muestreo estratificado simple. Para la recogida de los datos se empleó un modelo de Historia Clínica, de la cual se extrajeron los aspectos referidos a los datos sociodemográficos, la edad de inicio de los síntomas climatéricos y de la menopausia, las alteraciones genitourinarias y su intensidad en relación a la etapa del síndrome climatérico. Resultados: La edad promedio de las mujeres estudiadas fue de 49,4 +/- 5,18 años. La mayor cantidad de ellas se encontraban en la perimenopausia (60,1%), mientras que el porcentaje en las posmenopáusicas alcanzaba el 39,9%. La edad promedio de inicio de los síntomas fue de 45,8 +/- 6,2 años, la mayor frecuencia ocurrió entre los 45 y 49 años (61,5%). La edad promedio de aparición de la menopausia de 48,4+/- 3,7 años, lo que representa que más de dos tercios (81,6%) de las mujeres tuvieron su última menstruación por encima de los 45 años. Las alteraciones genitourinarias predominaron en la perimenopausia y la intensidad leve. Conclusiones: El síndrome genitourinario de la menopausia constituye un grupo de manifestaciones clínicas frecuentes en la mujer en etapa climatérica y afecta a más de dos tercios de las mujeres del policlínico, aparecen con mayor periodicidad entre los 45 y 49 años, en la perimenopausia y con intensidad leve.

Abstract Objective: To determine the frequency and intensity of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in womens treated in the climacteric and menopause consultation of the University Polyclinic 'Dr. Cosme Ordonez Carceller. Methods: Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional research, carried out in the period between January 2018 and December 2022. The universe of work was made up of 2962 middle-aged women from the Dr. Cosme Ordoñez Carceller university polyclinic. The sample consisted of 353 women selected by simple stratified sampling. For data collection, a Clinical History model was used, from which aspects related to sociodemographic data were extracted, the age of onset of climacteric symptoms and menopause, genitourinary disorders and their intensity in relation to the stage of climacteric syndrome. Results: The average age of the women studied was 49.4 +/- 5.18 years. The largest number of them were in perimenopause (60.1%), while the percentage in postmenopausal women reached 39.9%. The mean age of onset of symptoms was 45.8 +/- 6.2 years, the highest frequency occurring between 45 and 49 years (61.5%). The average age of onset of menopause of 48.4+/- 3.7 years, which represents that more than two thirds (81.6%) of the women had their last menstruation over 45 years of age. Genitourinary alterations predominated in perimenopause and mild intensity Conclusions: The genitourinary syndrome of menopause constitutes a group of frequent clinical manifestations in women in the climacteric stage and affect more than two thirds of the women al the policlinic, appearing more frequently between the ages of 45 and 49, in perimenopause and with mild intensity.

Bartholin Gland Cyst Mimicking Rectocele: Common Pathology at an Uncommon Location.

Vaginal cysts are often encountered in gynaecological outpatient settings. These are usually asymptomatic in their initial course but become symptomatic when their size increases or they get infected. While evaluating such cases, clinical examination plays a vital role in ruling out their differential diagnoses. Imaging studies can complement clinical findings. However, in some instances, the nature of vaginal cysts may not be determined preoperatively until histopathology examination reveals it. We report here a rare case of a posterior vaginal wall cyst that presented as a mass protruding through the vagina. The clinical dilemma was the characterization of the cyst, owing to its huge size and rare location. The cyst was managed surgically by excision, and to our surprise, histopathological examination revealed it as a Bartholin gland cyst in the posterior vaginal wall, rare in its location.

Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for pelvic floor disorders better than laparoscopic approach at the beginning of the experience? A retrospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: To compare perioperative results of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for pelvic floor disorders at the beginning of the surgical experience. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2022, the first 30 laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexies and the first 30 robotic ventral mesh rectopexies at the beginning of the experience of 2 surgeons were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative (demographic characteristics, surgical indication, conversion rate, operative time), and postoperative (complications, length of stay, unplanned reintervention) data were compared between groups. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Conversion rate was lower (0 vs 17%, p = 0.05), but the operative time was significantly longer (182 [146-290] vs 150 [75-240] minutes, p < 0.0001) during robotic procedure when compared with laparoscopic approach. In terms of learning curve, the number of procedures to obtain the same operative time between the 2 approaches was 15. Postoperative results were similar between groups, in terms of pain (visual analogic scale = 2 [0-8] vs 4 [0-9], p = 0.07), morbidity (17 vs 3%, p = 0.2), and unplanned reintervention (1 vs 0%, p = 0.99). Mean length of stay was significantly reduced after robotic approach when compared with laparoscopic approach (3 [2-10] vs 5 [2-11] days, p < 0.01). Functional results were better after robotic than laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, with higher satisfaction rate (93 vs 75%, p = 0.05), and reduced recurrence rate (0 vs 14%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Despite longer operative time at the beginning of the learning curve, robotic ventral mesh rectopexy was associated with similar or better perioperative results than laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.

Laparoscopic or transanal repair of rectocele? Comparison of a reduction in rectocele size.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the reduction in rectocele size after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) with that after transanal repair (TAR). METHODS: Forty-six patients with rectocele who underwent LVR and 45 patients with rectocele who received TAR between February 2012 and December 2022 were included. This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. All patients had clinical evidence of a symptomatic rectocele. Bowel function was evaluated using the constipation scoring system (CSS) and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI). Substantial symptom improvement was defined as at least a 50% reduction in the CSS or FISI scores. Evacuation proctography was performed before surgery and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Constipation was substantially improved in 40-70% of the LVR patients and 70-90% of the TAR patients over 5 years. Fecal incontinence was markedly improved in 60-90% of the LVR patients across 5 years and in 75% of the TAR patients at 1 year. Postoperative proctography showed a reduction in rectocele size in the LVR patients (30 [20-59] mm preoperatively vs. 11 [0-44] mm postoperatively, P < 0.0001) and TAR patients (33 [20-55] mm preoperatively vs. 8 [0-27] mm postoperatively, P < 0.0001). The reduction rate of rectocele size in the LVR patients was significantly lower than that in the TAR patients (63 [3-100] % vs. 79 [45-100] %, P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The reduction in rectocele size was lower in the patients who underwent LVR than in those who received TAR.

Anatomic outcomes of sacrohysteropexy without posterior mesh placement in patients with asymptomatic grade 1 and 2 rectoceles: Is a rectouterine mesh really necessary?

OBJECTIVES: To present the anatomic outcomes of sacrohysteropexy surgery without posterior mesh placement in patients with asymptomatic grade 1 and 2 rectoceles. METHODS: The patients who underwent abdominal sacrohysteropexy without posterior mesh placement for the treatment of symptomatic grade 3 and 4 anterior/apical prolapse + asymptomatic grade 1 and 2 rectocele between May 2015 and January 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. The success rate, the anatomic outcomes (for anterior, apical, and posterior pelvic organ prolapse [POP]), and perioperative data of the surgical procedure were assessed. The objective failure criteria after surgery included the presence of grade 1 or higher in any compartment (anatomical criteria), recurrent POP requiring an operation, and/or usage of pessaries. Perioperative adverse events were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent sacrohysteropexy without posterior mesh. The mean age of the patients was 56.8 ± 10 years. The success rates (anatomical outcomes) for the anterior/apical and posterior POP in the study group were 60.7%, 54.9%, and 58.8%, respectively, at a median follow-up time of 40.24 (24-71) months. The median hospital stay was 3.1 (2-6) days. The mean estimated blood loss was 127.6 (80-150) mL. The mean operation time was 114 (90-156) min. The mean urethral and catheter removal times were 1.3 (1, 2) and 2.1 (2-4) days, respectively. The mean recovery time of gastrointestinal motility was 14.4 h (11-35). CONCLUSIONS: Sacrohysteropexy without posterior mesh placement might be associated with less pain, shorter operative time, and shorter recovery time of gastrointestinal motility, without compromising the anatomic success.

Pathophysiological basis, clinical assessment, investigation and management of patients with obstruction defecation syndrome.

Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a clinical syndrome manifest as difficulty in faecal evacuation despite no mechanical obstruction. It is the final clinical pathway of a number of anatomical and physiological pathologies they can result in considerable misery to the lives of the patients it afflicts. Herein, the authors seek to breakdown the syndrome into its component parts, looking first at normal pelvic floor anatomy and physiology; followed by each pathological element; clinical features and investigation; individual management and management of the patient as a whole. It must be stated that correction of anatomy is not the sine qua non, as this does not always correlate to improvement of symptoms. There is a complex interplay of all elements, and a holistic approach appreciating the gestalt principle of "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" is paramount. Causes of pelvic pain (levator ani syndrome, coccygodynia, proctalgia fugax and pudendal neuralgia) do not fall into ODS and are beyond the scope of this paper.

Surgical Treatment for Rectocele by Posterior Colporrhaphy Compared to Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection.

Background: Rectocele is defined as a defect in the rectovaginal septum, causing symptoms like obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS), vaginal bulging, etc. Once the rectocele is larger than 3 cm and/or symptomatic, surgery should be considered. The surgical approach can be either transvaginal, transanal or transperineal. Two of the most common procedures in treating rectocele are posterior colporrhaphy (PC) and stapled trans anal rectal resection (STARR). The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes of both procedures. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Included were patients of the age of 18−85 years that underwent either STARR (n = 49 patients) or PC (n = 24 patients) procedures after a full clinical (defecography and physical exam before and after the surgery) and physiologic (a detailed questionnaire before and after the surgery) surveys. Symptoms of ODS before and after surgery were evaluated by questioners. Results: Preoperatively, the patients in the STARR group had significantly higher rates of ODS: straining (90.9% vs. 65.2%), incomplete evacuation (100% vs. 69.6%), hard stool (57.8% vs. 43.5%), sense of obstruction (76.1% vs. 56.5%), and use of digitation (64.4% vs. 47.8%), or laxatives (70% vs. 47.8%), p < 0.001. Anatomically, the mean rectocele size was smaller for the STARR group, compared to the PC group (3.8 ± 1.4 vs. 5.3 ± 2.2 cm, respectively, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, in the STARR group, higher rates of patients complained about straining (36.4% vs. 21.7%, p < 0.001) and use of digitation (64.4% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001), whereas lower rates of patients complained about incomplete evacuation (41.2% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.05) and sense of obstruction (17.6%, vs. 34.8%, p = 0.03), compared to the PC group. Among patients who underwent the STARR procedure, a decrease in rates of all symptoms was noted (straining 54.5%, incomplete evacuation 58.8%, hard stool 29.2%, sense of obstruction 58.5%, use of digitation 0.1%, and use of laxatives 31.5%). Both procedures are effective in reducing rectocele size (STARR- 1.9 ± 1 cm, PC- 3.1 ± 1). Conclusions: Both STARR and PC are effective in treating rectocele. It seems that the STARR procedure is superior to the PC procedure in treating symptoms of ODS.

Australian trends in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in the non-mesh era.

BACKGROUND: To assess the contemporary trends in the types and incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in Australia after the removal of transvaginal mesh from the Australian market. METHODS: This was a retrospective Australian cohort study utilizing three large Governmental databases covering all private and public POP procedures in Australia. All females ≥25 years old undergoing POP procedures between 2005 and 2021 were included. RESULTS: From 2005-2006 to 2020-2021 there have been a total of 408 881 POP procedures in Australia. The total number of procedures peaked in 2005-2006 at 537.8 procedures per 100 000 age-standardized female population, decreasing by an average of 3.5% per year to 329.0 procedures per 100 000 in 2018-2019, an overall 38.8% decrease (P < 0.001). A sudden growth in private operative procedures was noted between 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, from 218.2 to 268.6 procedures per 100 000 population, a 23.1% increase (P < 0.001). Laparoscopic and abdominal POP repair has seen a 115.8% increase from 13.7 procedures to 29.6 per 100 000 between 2005-2006 and 2020-2021. Over the last 15 years, the most common age group to undergo a procedure has changed from the 55 to 64 years demographic to a later decade of 65 to 74 years. CONCLUSION: Over the last 15 years, the total number of POP procedures performed has significantly decreased. There has however been a recent rise in interventions seen in the private sector and the utilization of laparoscopic or abdominal POP repair has increased, which has implications for procedural credentialing to ensure patient safety.

Translabial ultrasound for pelvic organ prolapse.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a significant public health concern in women and a common cause of gynecological surgery in elderly women. The prevalence of POP has increased with an increase in the aging population. POP is usually diagnosed based on pelvic examination. However, an imaging study may be necessary for more accurate diagnosis. Translabial ultrasound (TLUS) was used to assess diverse types of POP, particularly posterior-compartment POP. It is beneficial to distinguish between true and false rectocele, and detect the rectocele as clinically apparent. TLUS can also establish whether the underlying cause is a problem of the rectovaginal septum, perineal hypermobility, or isolated enterocele. TLUS also plays a role in differentiating POP from conditions that mimic POP. It is a simple, inexpensive, and non-harmful diagnostic modality that is appropriate for most gynecologic clinics.

Annual long-term functional outcomes after transanal repair for symptomatic rectocele.

Purpose: This study was performed to assess the long-term annual functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) after transanal rectocele repair. Methods: We evaluated retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent transanal repair for symptomatic rectocele between February 2012 and December 2018. The Constipation Scoring System (CSS), the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), and several QOL questionnaires (e.g., the Patient Assessment of Constipation-QOL [PAC-QOL], Fecal Incontinence QOL, and the 36-Item Short Form Survey [SF-36]) were administered before surgery and annually after surgery. Additionally, physiological assessments and defecography were performed before and after surgery. Substantial symptom improvement, indicated by at least a 50% reduction in the CSS or FISI score, was evaluated postoperatively. All postoperative follow-up results were compared with the preoperative data. Results: Thirty-two patients were included in the study. The median follow-up period was 5 years (range, 0.5-7 years). Postoperative defecography showed that the rectocele size significantly decreased (P<0.0001). However, the physiological assessment did not reveal postoperative changes. The CSS score 1 year after surgery was significantly lower than the preoperative score (P<0.0001) and remained significantly low until the long-term follow-up. Constipation improved by more than 80% 2 to 5 years postoperatively, and fecal incontinence improved in 2/3 of the patients after 5 years. The PAC-QOL scores significantly improved (all P<0.05) over time until the 3-year and long-term follow-ups, and 6 of the 8 SF-36 scores significantly improved at specific points postoperatively. Conclusion: Transanal rectocele repair provides long-term improvement for constipation and constipation-specific QOL.

Utility of gastrointestinal transit scintigraphy in the evaluation of chronic constipation.

AIM: Chronic constipation is a common pathology in clinical practice. In the absence of response to treatment, assessment of gastrointestinal function is recommended. This can be performed by scintigraphy, although its use is not widespread. The aim of this paper was to assess the utility of gastrointestinal transits scintigraphy in patients with chronic constipation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients (13 children) sent for scintigraphy for chronic constipation refractory to treatment, syringomyelia, rectocele or abdominal migraine were evaluated. All underwent clinical assessment, analytical determination, radiological imaging and/or rectal biopsy. A complete study protocol was performed, including gastric emptying, small bowel and colonic transits scintigraphy. For this, a dose of [111In]In-DTPA diluted in water (37MBq) was administered together with standardized food. Following international guidelines, regions of interest were defined in the stomach, terminal ileum and different regions of the large intestine to calculate the geometric center as a measure of progression. RESULTS: Of the 13 pediatric patients, 10 had abnormal gammagraphic patterns, with treatment being modified in 8 of them. Most of the children showed no alterations on radiological explorations. In adult patients, the results of the test changed the therapeutic management in all of them. CONCLUSIONS: Scintigraphic study provided useful information in the study of chronic constipation, influencing the diagnosis and therapeutic management of the patient. The physiological and quantitative information it provides allows both global and regional of gastrointestinal transit time determination.

Higher symptom score, larger residual rectocele, and lower rectal compliance predict failure of improvement after surgical treatment of rectocele

Background: Rectocele is a frequent finding in women and is usually asymptomatic. However, it is sometimes associated with symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). While most patients with ODS due to rectocele respond well to conservative treatment, some may require surgical treatment. The aim of the study was to determine the predictors of failure of symptom improvement after rectocele repair. Methods: The study included adult women with rectocele who underwent surgical treatment by transperineal repair (TPR) or transvaginal repair (TVR). The preoperative and postoperative assessment was done using the Wexner constipation score, anorectal manometry, and defecography. Results: A total of 93 female patients with a mean age of 43.7 years were included. Among them, 65.6% of patients underwent TPR and 34.4% underwent TVR; 22 (23.7%) patients reported failure of significant improvement in ODS symptoms after surgery. The independent predictors of failure of improvement were higher preoperative Wexner score (odds ratio, OR: 1.4, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.09-1.84, p = 0.009), larger residual rectocele after repair (OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.43-6.08, p = 0.003), and lower postoperative maximum tolerable volume (OR: 0.949, 95% CI: 0.907-0.992, p = 0.02). The predictive cutoff point for the preoperative Wexner score was 15. Conclusions: Patients with a preoperative Wexner score higher than 15 and larger residual rectocele after surgery may experience little improvement in symptoms after rectocele repair. Although TPR was associated with a poorer relief of symptoms than did TVR; it was not an independent predictor of failure. (AU)

Profile of women with pelvic organ prolapse at the University Hospital of the West Indies risk factors and presentation.

POP affected 40% of participants in the WHI trial. Risk factors include parity, vaginal delivery, large babies, advancing age, obesity, hysterectomy and lifting. Data suggest African-American women have a lower prevalence of symptomatic POP than other racial groups. Literature review did not show a study of risk factors and symptoms in a black population. Cross-sectional study of women with POP attending urogynaecology clinic at the UHWI from May to October 2013, using an interviewer administered questionnaire was performed and analysed using SPSS version 19 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). One hundred and eight participants were included: 94.7% postmenopausal (mean 65.08 years) and 94.5% parous (mean 4). Risk factors included obesity (mean BMI 28.82 kg/m2), hysterectomy (28.7%), heavy lifting (51.9%) and chronic cough (13.9%). Symptoms included stress incontinence (40.7%), stranguria (16.7%), faecal incontinence (13.9%), constipation (31.5%), coital urinary and faecal incontinence (6.3%, 12.6%). We concluded risk factors for POP in this population correlates with other studies. Stress urinary incontinence and constipation most frequently reported symptoms in this population.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition with multifactorial aetiology. As seen in systematic reviews (Vergeldt TFM, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. 2015. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. International Urogynecology Journal 26(11):1559-1573). Study shows white women appeared to have more overall symptoms both from prolapse, as well as urinary symptoms, as compared with black women (Ford AT, Eto CU, Smith M, Northington GM. 2019. Racial differences in pelvic organ prolapse symptoms among women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery for prolapse. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 25:130-133).What do the results of this study add? The result highlights the fact that Black women are exposed to similar risk factors and have similar symptoms to other racial groups for POP.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings can be used to educate women with risk factors about the possibility of developing symptomatic POP. Further research is needed to ascertain the prevalence of POP and to assess knowledge and attitude in this population as we hypothesise that there is generalised assumption in that being black is protective from POP.

Current techniques used to perform surgery for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse in South Korea.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the current surgical techniques for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair in South Korea. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire survey was sent to 780 members of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The items assessed in the questionnaire were the demographic characteristics and current surgical techniques used for the correction of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse. RESULTS: The response rate was 16%. There were variations in the suture materials and methods used for anterior and posterior colporrhaphy. Most respondents used only rapid absorbable suture materials to plicate the fibromuscular layer and close the mucosal layer of the anterior and posterior vaginal wall. Simple interrupted sutures are the most popular suture method for both the fibromuscular and mucosal layers. Thirty-one and eleven percent of the respondents used mesh for surgical correction of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse, respectively. Concomitant perineorrhaphy was routinely performed with posterior vaginal wall repair by 42% of the respondents, whereas 58% performed perineorrhaphy only in cases with perineal defects. CONCLUSION: There is considerable diversity in the current surgical techniques for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair in Korea. Further research is required to standardize the surgical techniques.

Rectocele: victim of availability bias? Results of a Belgian survey of colorectal and gynecological surgeons.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Women with a symptomatic rectocele may undergo different trajectories depending on the specialty consulted. This survey aims to evaluate potential differences between colorectal surgeons and gynecologists concerning the management of a rectocele. METHODS: A web-based survey was sent to abdominal surgeons (CS group) and gynecologists (G group) asking about their perceived definition, diagnostic workup, multidisciplinary discussion (MDT) and surgical treatment of rectoceles. The answers of both groups were analyzed with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test at p < 0.050. RESULTS: A rectocele was defined as a prolapse of the posterior vaginal wall by 78% of the G and 41% of the CS group. All gynecologists and 49% of the CS group evaluated a rectocele clinically in dorsal decubitus, with 91% of gynecologists using a speculum and 65% using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification (POP-Q) scoring system, compared to < 1/3 of colorectal surgeons. A digital rectal examination was performed by 90% of the CS group and 57% of the G group. A transvaginal ultrasound was only used by the G group, while anal manometry was opted for by the CS group (65%) and minimally by the G group (14%). In the G group, a posterior repair was the preferred surgical technique (78%), whereas 63% of the CS group preferred a rectopexy. Multidisciplinary discussions (MDT) were mostly organized ad hoc. CONCLUSIONS: An availability bias is seen in different aspects of rectocele evaluation and treatment. Colorectal surgeons and gynecologists are acting based on their training and experience. Motivation for pelvic floor MDT starts with creating awareness of the availability bias.