Targeting T regulatory (Treg) cells in immunotherapy-resistant cancers.

Primary or secondary (i.e., acquired) resistance is a common occurrence in cancer patients and is often associated with high numbers of T regulatory (Treg) cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+). The approval of ipilimumab and the development of similar pharmacological agents targeting cell surface proteins on Treg cells demonstrates that such intervention may overcome resistance in cancer patients. Hence, the clinical development and subsequent approval of Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA-4) targeting agents can serve as a prototype for similar agents. Such new agents aspire to be highly specific and have a reduced toxicity profile while increasing effector T cell function or effector T/T regulatory (Teff/Treg) ratio. While clinical development with large molecules has shown the greatest advancement, small molecule inhibitors that target immunomodulation are increasingly entering early clinical investigation. These new small molecule inhibitors often target specific intracellular signaling pathways [e.g., phosphoinositide-3-kinase delta (PI3K-δ)] that play an important role in regulating the function of Treg cells. This review will summarize the lessons currently applied to develop novel clinical agents that target Treg cells.

Clinical definition of secondary resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 blockade) have revolutionized the treatment landscape in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Secondary resistance to immunotherapy (IO), which poses a substantial challenge in clinical settings, occurs in several initial responders. Currently, new treatment approaches have been extensively evaluated in investigational studies for these patients to tackle this difficult problem; however, the lack of consistency in clinical definition, uniform criteria for enrollment in clinical trials, and interpretation of results remain significant hurdles to progress. Thus, our expert panel comprehensively synthesized data from current studies to propose a practical clinical definition of secondary resistance to immunotherapy in NSCLC in metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. In addition to patients who received IO alone (including IO-IO combinations), we also generated a definition for patients treated with chemotherapy plus IO. This consensus aimed to provide guidance for clinical trial design and facilitate future discussions with investigators. It should be noted that additional updates in this consensus are required when new data is available.

Analysis of potential Circular RNAs in regulating imatinib resistance of Gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have found that circular RNA is an abundant RNA species that belongs to part of the competing endogenous RNA network(ceRNA), which was proven to play an important role in the development, diagnosis and progress of diseases. However, the function of circRNAs in imatinib resistance in Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are poorly understood so for. The present study aimed to screen and predict the potential circRNAs in imatinib resistance of GIST using microarray analysis. METHODS: We determined the expression of circular RNAs in paired normal gastric tissues(N), primary GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor) tissues (YC) and imatinib mesylate secondary resistance GIST tissues(C) with microarray and predicted 8677 dysregulated circular RNAs. RESULTS: Compared with the YC group, we identified 15 circRNAs that were up-regulated and 8 circRNAs that were down-regulated in the C group. Gene ontology (GO)and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis indicated that these host linear transcripts that differentially express circular RNAs are involved in many key biological pathways, predicting the potential tumor-genesis and drug resistance mechanismrelated to HIF-1 pathway, later we draw the cirRNA-miRNA-mRNA network involved in the HIF-1 pathway and found several dysregulated circRNAs and the relationship between circRNA-miRNAs-mRNA, such as circRNA_06551, circRNA_14668, circRNA_04497, circRNA_08683, circRNA_09923(Green, down-regulation) and circRNA_23636, circRNA_15734(Red, up-regulation). CONCLUSION: Taken together, we identified a panel of dysregulated circRNAs that may be potential biomarkers even therapy relevant to the GIST, especially imatinib secondary resistance GIST.

Dynamic gut microbiota changes in patients with advanced malignancies experiencing secondary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune-related adverse events.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy, but secondary resistance (SR) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are significant clinical dilemmas. Although the gut microbiota is associated with ICI efficacy and irAEs, the knowledge of longitudinal gut microbiota dynamics during SR and irAE development is still quite limited. Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study of cancer patients initially receiving anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) treatment between May 2020 and October 2022. Clinical information was collected to evaluate therapy response and AEs. Patients were divided into a secondary resistance (SR) group, a non-secondary resistance (NSR) group, and an irAE group. Fecal samples were longitudinally obtained from baseline across multiple timepoints and analyzed with 16S rRNA sequencing. Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 29 were evaluable. After a median follow-up of 13.3 months, NSR patients had a favorable progression-free survival (PFS) compared with SR (457.9 IQR 241.0-674.0 days vs. 141.2 IQR 116.9-165.4 days, P=0.003) and irAE patients (457.9 IQR 241.0-674.0 days vs. 269.9, IQR 103.2-436.5 days, P=0.053). There were no significant differences in the microbiota between groups at baseline. Several previously reported beneficial microbiomes for ICI efficacy including Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, Agathobacter, and Faecalibacterium showed decreasing trends as secondary resistance developed, yet not achieved significance (P>0.05). Significant changes in butyrate-producing bacteria were also presented in the SR cohort (P=0.043) with a decreasing trend upon secondary resistance occurrence (P=0.078). While the abundance of IgA-coated bacteria was stable in the SR cohort, there was a temporary decrease upon ICI treatment initiation and reestablishment after continuation of ICI treatment in the NSR cohort (primary ICI response: 0.06, IQR 0.04-0.10; durable ICI response: 0.11, IQR 0.07-0.14; P=0.042). Bacteroides contributed most to the difference between baseline and irAE occurrence, which decreased after irAE occurrence (Baseline: 0.10 IQR 0.07-0.36; irAE occurrence: 0.08 IQR 0.06-0.12) and was restored upon irAE remission to a comparable level as baseline (irAE remission: 0.10 IQR 0.09-0.18). Conclusions: The development of SR and irAEs is related to the longitudinal dynamics of the intestinal microbiota. The investigation into the preventative and protective effects of enteric microbe manipulation strategies is further required.

Macroprolactinoma with secondary resistance to dopamine agonists: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to dopamine agonists is not uncommonly seen in prolactinomas. However, development of resistance to dopamine agonists after an initial period of robust treatment response is rare, and only 39 cases have been reported in the past four decades. We describe a Chinese man with this rare condition and explored the postulated mechanisms that may explain this phenomenon. We compiled similar cases that were previously reported and compared their etiology, progress, and response to treatment. On the basis of these cases, we derived a list of differential diagnoses to consider in patients with secondary resistance to dopamine agonists. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old Chinese man presented with blurred vision and was subsequently diagnosed with a macroprolactinoma. He had initial response to cabergoline but developed secondary resistance to it after 5 years. The prolactinoma continued to grow, and his serum prolactin remained markedly elevated despite adherence to escalating dosages of cabergoline up to 6 mg/week. The patient finally underwent transsphenoidal surgery and was found to have a sparsely granulated lactotroph tumor with Ki-67 index of 5%. Postoperatively, there was improvement in his serum prolactin level, although he still required treatment with cabergoline at 6 mg/week. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery can facilitate disease control in patients with prolactinomas that develop secondary resistance to dopamine agonists. Malignant prolactinoma is an important differential diagnosis in this group of patients, especially when serum prolactin remains markedly elevated despite resolution or stability of the primary pituitary lesion, suggesting a metastatic source of prolactin secretion.

Solute Carrier Family 29A1 Mediates In Vitro Resistance to Azacitidine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cell Lines.

Azacitidine (AZA) is commonly used hypomethylating agent for higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although some patients achieve remission, eventually most patients fail AZA therapy. Comprehensive analysis of intracellular uptake and retention (IUR) of carbon-labeled AZA (14C-AZA), gene expression, transporter pump activity with or without inhibitors, and cytotoxicity in naïve and resistant cell lines provided insight into the mechanism of AZA resistance. AML cell lines were exposed to increasing concentrations of AZA to create resistant clones. 14C-AZA IUR was significantly lower in MOLM-13- (1.65 ± 0.08 ng vs. 5.79 ± 0.18 ng; p < 0.0001) and SKM-1- (1.10 ± 0.08 vs. 5.08 ± 0.26 ng; p < 0.0001) resistant cells compared to respective parental cells. Importantly, 14C-AZA IUR progressively reduced with downregulation of SLC29A1 expression in MOLM-13- and SKM-1-resistant cells. Furthermore, nitrobenzyl mercaptopurine riboside, an SLC29A inhibitor, reduced 14C-AZA IUR in MOLM-13 (5.79 ± 0.18 vs. 2.07 ± 0.23, p < 0.0001) and SKM-1-naive cells (5.08 ± 2.59 vs. 1.39 ± 0.19, p = 0.0002) and reduced efficacy of AZA. As the expression of cellular efflux pumps such as ABCB1 and ABCG2 did not change in AZA-resistant cells, they are unlikely contribute to AZA resistance. Therefore, the current study provides a causal link between in vitro AZA resistance and downregulation of cellular influx transporter SLC29A1.

Targeted Inhibitors of EGFR: Structure, Biology, Biomarkers, and Clinical Applications.

Members of the EGFR family of tyrosine kinase receptors are major regulators of cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival. In humans, abnormal activation of EGFR is associated with the development and progression of many cancer types, which makes it an attractive target for molecular-guided therapy. Two classes of EGFR-targeted cancer therapeutics include monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which bind to the extracellular domain of EGFR, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which mostly target the intracellular part of EGFR and inhibit its activity in molecular signaling. While EGFR-specific mAbs and three generations of TKIs have demonstrated clinical efficacy in various settings, molecular evolution of tumors leads to apparent and sometimes inevitable resistance to current therapeutics, which highlights the need for deeper research in this field. Here, we tried to provide a comprehensive and systematic overview of the rationale, molecular mechanisms, and clinical significance of the current EGFR-targeting drugs, highlighting potential candidate molecules in development. We summarized the underlying mechanisms of resistance and available personalized predictive approaches that may lead to improved efficacy of EGFR-targeted therapies. We also discuss recent developments and the use of specific therapeutic strategies, such as multi-targeting agents and combination therapies, for overcoming cancer resistance to EGFR-specific drugs.

Resistance to Antiangiogenic Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Impact.

Antiangiogenic drugs were the only mainstay of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment from 2007 to 2017. However, primary or secondary resistance hampered their efficacy. Primary resistance could be due to different molecular and/or genetic characteristics of HCC and their knowledge would clarify the optimal treatment approach in each patient. Several molecular mechanisms responsible for secondary resistance have been discovered over the last few years; they represent potential targets for new specific drugs. In this light, the advent of checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been a new opportunity; however, their use has highlighted other issues: the vascular normalization compared to a vessel pruning to promote the delivery of an active cancer immunotherapy and the development of resistance to immunotherapy which leads to a better selection of patients as candidates for ICIs. Nevertheless, the combination of antiangiogenic therapy plus ICIs represents an intriguing approach with high potential to improve the survival of these patients. Waiting for results from ongoing clinical trials, this review depicts the current knowledge about the resistance to antiangiogenic drugs in HCC. It could also provide updated information to clinicians focusing on the most effective combinations or sequential approaches in this regard, based on molecular mechanisms.

Serial Analysis of Gene Mutations and Gene Expression during First-Line Chemotherapy against Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Identification of Potentially Actionable Targets within the Multicenter Prospective Biomarker Study REVEAL.

Most metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients succumb to refractory disease due to secondary chemotherapy resistance. To elucidate the molecular changes associated with secondary resistance, we recruited 64 patients with mCRC and hepatic metastases before standard first-line chemotherapy between 2014 and 2018. We subjected DNA from primary tumor specimens (P), hepatic metastasis specimens after treatment (M), and liquid biopsies (L) taken prior to (pre), during (intra), and after (post) treatment to next generation sequencing. We performed Nanostring expression analysis in P and M specimens. Comparative bioinformatics and statistical analysis revealed typical mutational patterns with frequent alterations in TP53, APC, and KRAS in P specimens (n = 48). P and pre-L (n = 42), as well as matched P and M (n = 30), displayed a similar mutation spectrum. In contrast, gene expression profiles classified P (n = 31) and M (n = 23), distinguishable by up-regulation of immune/cytokine receptor and autophagy programs. Switching of consensus molecular subtypes from P to M occurred in 58.3% of cases. M signature genes SFRP2 and SPP1 associated with inferior survival, as validated in an independent cohort. Molecular changes during first-line treatment were detectable by expression profiling rather than by mutational tumor and liquid biopsy analyses. SFRP2 and SPP1 may serve as biomarkers and/or actionable targets.

New Therapy Options for Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Pancreas-The Emergent Substance GP-2250 and Gemcitabine Prove to Be Highly Effective without the Development of Secondary Resistances In Vitro and In Vivo.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas (pNEC) is an aggressive form of neuroendocrine tumor characterized by a rising incidence without an increase in survival rates. GP-2250 is an oxathiazinane derivate possessing antineoplastic effects, especially in combination with Gemcitabine on the pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The cytotoxic effects of the monotherapy of GP-2250 (GP-2250mono) and Gemcitabine (Gemmono), as well as the combination therapy of both, were studied in vitro using an MTT-assay on the QGP-1 and BON-1 cell lines, along with in vivo studies on a murine xenograft model of QGP-1 and a patient-derived xenograft model (PDX) of Bo99. In vitro, Gemmono and GP-2250mono showed a dose-dependent cytotoxicity. The combination of GP-2250 and Gemcitabine exhibited highly synergistic effects. In vivo, the combination therapy obtained a partial response in QGP-1, while GP-2250mono and Gemmono showed progressive disease or stable disease, respectively. In Bo99 PDX, the combination therapy led to a partial response, while the monotherapy resulted in progressive disease. No development of secondary resistances was observed, as opposed to monotherapy. This study was the first to evaluate the effects of the emerging substance GP-2250 on pNEC. The substance showed synergism in combination with Gemcitabine. The combination therapy proved to be effective in vitro and in vivo, without the development of secondary resistances.

Establishment of the prediction model and biological mechanism exploration for secondary imatinib-resistant in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

A gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is mostly driven by the auto-activated, mutant KIT receptor tyrosine kinase gene or by the platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha. Inhibition of KIT-signaling is the primary molecular target therapy for GIST, which is performed by the drug imatinib clinically. However, more than half of advanced or metastatic GIST develop secondary resistance to imatinib within 2 years after initiation of treatment, and the mechanism of acquired imatinib-resistant in GIST remains unclear. Therefore, we designed the present study, and firstly analyzed the gene expression profile of imatinib-resistant and sensitive GIST from GEO DataSet and identified 44 differential expressed genes. Then, a model including nine genes with their expressed coefficients was identified as a risk score to predict imatinib-resistant GIST. Internal and external validation of the prediction model was performed through the ROC curve, and the area under the curve was 0.967 (95%CI 0.901-1.000) and 0.917 (95%CI 0.753-1.000), separately. Lastly, the effect of immune, m6A, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis-related genes on imatinib-resistant GIST was also assessed because DNA replication was the most enriched biological function of DEGs after functional annotation, pathway enrichment, and protein-protein interaction network analyses. In conclusion, the present study established a novel model to predict secondary imatinib-resistant GIST. Meanwhile, the bioinformatic mining results provided potential and promising targets for imatinib-resistant therapy.

Exploring biological heterogeneity and implications on novel treatment paradigm in BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer.

Approximatively 8-15% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harbor mutation in BRAF gene. Recent advances in molecular biology enabled a better knowledge of the molecular heterogeneity within BRAF mutant (BRAFMT) CRCs, including high rate of overlapping with MSI-H status and detection of non-V600E mutations related to more favorable behavior. Treatment armamentarium has been rapidly growing in this subgroup and includes targeted combinations and immunotherapy for concomitant MSI-H patients, thereby making BRAFMT mCRC an innovative model for precision oncology. Nevertheless, duration of responses to targeted strategies remains unsatisfactory due to the development of secondary resistance, which is currently the field of major clinical research on BRAFMT mCRC. This review explores the molecular, clinical and therapeutic landscape of BRAFMT mCRC as well as an update on current treatment strategies and future perspectives in light of the heterogeneity of BRAF-mutated disease. Furthermore, a novel treatment algorithm for BRAFMT mCRC will be proposed.

Secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapy by transcriptional reprogramming in patient-derived colorectal cancer models.

BACKGROUND: The development of secondary resistance (SR) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibodies is not fully understood at the molecular level. Here we tested in vivo selection of anti-EGFR SR tumors in CRC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models as a strategy for a molecular dissection of SR mechanisms. METHODS: We analyzed 21 KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PI3K wildtype CRC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models for their anti-EGFR sensitivity. Furthermore, 31 anti-EGFR SR tumors were generated via chronic in vivo treatment with cetuximab. A multi-omics approach was employed to address molecular primary and secondary resistance mechanisms. Gene set enrichment analyses were used to uncover SR pathways. Targeted therapy of SR PDX models was applied to validate selected SR pathways. RESULTS: In vivo anti-EGFR SR could be established with high efficiency. Chronic anti-EGFR treatment of CRC PDX tumors induced parallel evolution of multiple resistant lesions with independent molecular SR mechanisms. Mutations in driver genes explained SR development in a subgroup of CRC PDX models, only. Transcriptional reprogramming inducing anti-EGFR SR was discovered as a common mechanism in CRC PDX models frequently leading to RAS signaling pathway activation. We identified cAMP and STAT3 signaling activation, as well as paracrine and autocrine signaling via growth factors as novel anti-EGFR secondary resistance mechanisms. Secondary resistant xenograft tumors could successfully be treated by addressing identified transcriptional changes by tailored targeted therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that SR PDX tumors provide a unique platform to study molecular SR mechanisms and allow testing of multiple treatments for efficient targeting of SR mechanisms, not possible in the patient. Importantly, it suggests that the development of anti-EGFR tolerant cells via transcriptional reprogramming as a cause of anti-EGFR SR in CRC is likely more prevalent than previously anticipated. It emphasizes the need for analyses of SR tumor tissues at a multi-omics level for a comprehensive molecular understanding of anti-EGFR SR in CRC.

Efficacy of Long-Term Adjuvant Therapy With Imatinib Mesylate After Extensive Surgical Treatment for Ruptured Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Small Intestine With Peritoneal Metastases: A Case Report.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Although most patients with advanced GISTs benefit from imatinib mesylate (IM) as standard targeted therapy, the optimal duration of adjuvant IM for GIST patients with high risk of recurrence who underwent surgical resection remains unknown. In this article, we present a case of a ruptured GIST of the small intestine accompanied by peritoneal metastases, which was effectively treated by surgical procedure followed by long-term adjuvant therapy with IM. Surgical resection was performed for the ruptured small intestinal GIST, and multitude of peritoneal metastases were cauterized. The patient received adjuvant therapy with IM (400 mg/day) for 12 years without an interruption or a dose change. Peritoneal metastatic recurrence was observed by the follow-up computed tomography scan obtained 12 years after surgery, and surgical resection of the recurrent GIST was performed. The molecular examination indicated a KIT exon 11 deletion mutation in both the primary GIST and recurrent GIST. An additional point mutation was observed in the recurrent GIST in exon 17 that caused resistance to IM. The present case might indicate that extensive removal of the tumor cells through surgery and long-term administration of IM without an interruption or a dose change were important for achieving improved recurrence-free survival in patients with ruptured GISTs of the small intestine with peritoneal metastases.

A shift of dynamic equilibrium between the KIT active and inactive states causes drug resistance.

Tyrosine phosphorylation, a highly regulated post-translational modification, is carried out by the enzyme tyrosine kinase (TK). TKs are important mediators in signaling cascades, facilitating diverse biological processes in response to stimuli. TKs may acquire mutations leading to malignancy and are viable targets for anti-cancer drugs. Mast/stem cell growth factor receptor KIT is a TK involved in cell differentiation, whose dysregulation leads to various types of cancer, including gastrointestinal stromal tumors, leukemia, and melanoma. KIT can be targeted by a range of inhibitors that predominantly bind to the inactive state of the enzyme. A mutation Y823D in the activation loop of KIT is known to be responsible for the loss of sensitivity to some drugs in metastatic tumors. We used all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to study the impact of Y823D on the KIT conformation and dynamics and compared it to the effect of phosphorylation of Y823. We simulated in total 6.4 µs of wild-type, mutant and phosphorylated KIT in the active- and inactive-state conformations. We found that Y823D affects the protein dynamics differently: in the active state, the mutation increases the protein stability, whereas in the inactive state it induces local destabilization, thus shifting the dynamic equilibrium towards the active state, altering the communication between distant regulatory regions. The observed dynamics of the Y823D mutant is similar to the dynamics of KIT phosphorylated at position Y823, thus we hypothesize that this mutation mimics a constitutively active kinase, which is not responsive to inhibitors that bind its inactive conformation.

Future Challenges in Cancer Resistance to Immunotherapy.

Cancer immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive T cell transfer and therapeutic cancer vaccines, have shown promising response rates in clinical trials. Unfortunately, there is an increasing number of patients in which initially regressing tumors start to regrow due to an immunotherapy-driven acquired resistance. Studies on the underlying mechanisms reveal that these can be similar to well-known tumor intrinsic and extrinsic primary resistance factors that precluded the majority of patients from responding to immunotherapy in the first place. Here, we discuss primary and secondary immune resistance and point at strategies to identify potential new mechanisms of immune evasion. Ultimately, this may lead to improved immunotherapy strategies with improved clinical outcomes.

Secondary resistance to immunotherapy associated with ß-catenin pathway activation or PTEN loss in metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: While cancer immunotherapies including checkpoint blockade antibodies, adoptive T cell therapy, and even some vaccines have given rise to major clinical responses with durability in many cases, a subset of patients who initially respond subsequently develop secondary resistance to therapy. Tumor-intrinsic mechanisms of acquired immunotherapy resistance are incompletely understood. METHODS: Baseline and treatment-resistant tumors underwent molecular analysis via transcriptional profiling or genomic sequencing for oncogenic alterations and histologic analysis for T cell infiltration to investigate mechanisms contributing to T cell exclusion and acquired resistance to immunotherapy. RESULTS: We describe two patients with metastatic melanoma who initially showed a durable partial response to either a melanoma-peptide/interleukin-12 vaccine or combined anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1 therapy, but subsequently developed new treatment-resistant metastases. In the first case, the recurrent tumor showed new robust tumor expression of ß-catenin, whereas in the second case genomic sequencing revealed acquired PTEN loss. Both cases were associated with loss of T cell infiltration, and both pathways have been mechanistically linked to immune resistance preclinically. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that secondary resistance to immunotherapies can arise upon selection for new oncogenic variants that mediate T cell exclusion. To identify the spectrum of underlying mechanisms of therapeutic resistance, similar evaluation for the emergence of tumor-intrinsic alterations in resistant lesions should be done prospectively at the time of relapse in a range of additional patients developing secondary resistance.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for patients with refractory breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The development of resistance to therapy is a concern in all three subtypes of breast cancer (BC). Yet, outcomes of patients with BC have improved in the past few years thanks to a molecularly targeted approach and a greater understanding of the many mechanisms through which cancer cells adapt to evade drug therapies. Indeed, there have been a number of different and active treatment strategies for hormone receptor positive (HR+ and Her2 positive BC although triple-negative breast cancer treatment remains problematical because of the early onset of resistance to treatments and the limited availability of targeted treatment options. AREAS COVERED: Herein, the authors present the various pharmacotherapeutic options for refractory breast cancer including their perspectives on these options. EXPERT OPINION: In recent years, there has been significant progress in our understanding of the biological mechanisms that cause resistance to BC treatments. The targeted therapeutic approach particularly has improved patient outcomes for those with refractory BC, but some unresolved issues still remain. In particular, we need to identify biomarkers of resistance to better tailor treatments, toxicities, and costs. Moreover, we need to determine the best sequence of treatments in refractory BC patients.

Mechanisms of Primary and Secondary Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis) have revolutionized cancer therapy with broad activities against a wide range of malignancies. However, in many malignancies their efficacy remains limited due to the primary resistance. Furthermore, a high percentage of patients develop progression due to the secondary resistance even after obtaining a response or achieving a stable disease. In this review, we will discuss the mechanisms that underlie the primary and secondary resistance to ICPis in cancer immunotherapy and provide an overview to impart a broad understanding of the critical issues that are encountered in clinical oncology practice.