RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hip fracture surgeries in elderly patients often require spinal or general anesthesia, posing risks of severe hypotension and inadequate pain management. The optimal anesthesia type for minimizing these risks remains undetermined. Preliminary studies suggest that a combination of fascia iliaca block (FIB) and low-dose low-specific-gravity spinal anesthesia (LLSA) might offer a solution, but comprehensive evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of combining FIB with LLSA for reducing severe hypotension and enhancing analgesia during hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted. SETTING: An operating theatre of a tertiary hospital. METHODS: The study comprised 68 patients. They were separated into 2 equal parallel groups 34 patients each: the FIB+LLSA group and the general anesthesia (GA) group. Patients aged 75-96 undergoing primary hip arthroplasty for hip fracture were randomized to receive either FIB+LLSA or GA. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe hypotension; secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, use of rescue analgesia, vasopressor dosage, and complications. RESULTS: We found a significantly lower incidence of severe hypotension in the FIB+LLSA group compared to the GA group (32.4% vs 67.6%). Additionally, postoperative pain scores were significantly lower, and the need for rescue analgesia was reduced in the FIB+LLSA group. Vasopressor use during surgery was also significantly lower in the FIB+LLSA group. The hospital stay was shorter in the FIB+LLSA group, with an average of 5.9 days compared to 6.7 days in the GA group. LIMITATIONS: The study's limitations include its single-center nature, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the inability to conduct a double-blind study could introduce biases, though measures were taken to minimize this. The sample size might not be sufficient to determine the broader implications of LLSA. CONCLUSIONS: Combining FIB with LLSA for elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery significantly reduces the incidence of severe intraoperative hypotension and postoperative pain. It also decreases the need for rescue analgesia and shortens hospital stays, suggesting that FIB+LLSA could be a beneficial regional anesthesia technique for elderly hip fracture surgery patients, aligning with enhanced recovery protocols.
Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Fraturas do Quadril , Hipotensão , Bloqueio Nervoso , Humanos , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Idoso , Raquianestesia/métodos , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Masculino , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Analgesia/métodos , FásciaRESUMO
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate patients' expectative pain of spinal anesthesia puncture and anxiety pre-anesthesia, and to examine the effect of lidocaine-prilocaine cream and remimazolam prior to spinal anesthesia puncture on pain relief and anxiety release. Methods: Patients undergoing spinal anesthesia were divided into control, lidocaine-prilocaine cream, and lidocaine-prilocaine cream with remimazolam groups. A questionnaire consisting of The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) and patient's concerns and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate patient's anxiety and pain. The primary outcomes were differences in VAS and anxiety scores. Patient's spinal anesthesia-related concerns, advent events and hemodynamic index were also recorded. Results: The expected spinal anesthesia puncture pain was 5.34±0.27 and anxiety scores before spinal anesthesia was 10.88 ± 0.64. A statistically significant positive correlation of 31.3% was detected between VAS and APAIS scores (r = 0.313; P=0.003). The VAS score at the time of puncture decreased by 29.7% (3.78±0.40, P=0.001) in lidocaine-prilocaine cream group and 29.2% (3.75±0.39, P=0.001) in lidocaine-prilocaine cream with remimazolam group compared with the expected VAS score. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream combined with or without remimazolam reduced the percentage of moderate pain (21.4% and 31.3% vs 50.0%, P=0.0001) and increased mild pain (60.7% vs 59.4% vs 22.7%, P=0.03). Anxiety score in lidocaine-prilocaine cream group was reduced by 2.84 (8.04±0.76 vs 10.88 ± 0.46, P=0.05) when compared with pre-anesthesia. Concerns about postoperative pain (P=0.03) and fear of the needle or intervention (P=0.000) both decreased post-anesthesia among groups. Conclusion: Approximately half of the patients scheduled for spinal anesthesia experienced a moderate level of preoperative anxiety. The patient's pain expectation from the spinal anesthesia puncture was moderate, which was higher than the actual pain. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream with or without remimazolam sedative before spinal anesthesia puncture reduced the patient's pain and anxiety scores after surgery.
Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Ansiedade , Lidocaína , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Ansiedade/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/farmacologia , Prilocaína/administração & dosagem , Benzodiazepinas/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Medição da DorRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCY: A patient experienced a sudden cardiac arrest (CA) during a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) under spinal anesthesia (SA), despite no conventional risk factors. The incident, which occurred during TURP without significant changes in vital signs or electrocardiogram (ECG), this report, contributes to accidents during SA for TURP in healthy patients. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 53-year-old man with BMI 24.1 underwent TURP. SA was administered using bupivacaine 15 mg and fentanyl 10 µg. The patient had normal vital signs & sinus rhythm. However, around a hr. into the procedure, he experienced fatigue, severe chest pain, sweating, & nausea, leading to unconsciousness & CA. The anesthesia and surgical teams initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation according to American Heart Association guidelines, but CA could not be reversed. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The patient showed symptoms of acute MI while undergoing TURP but didn't exhibit typical changes on ECG. Early detection using a 5lead ECG or troponin level may not be possible so make it challenging to get definitive diagnosis of MI to start managements. It's highlighted that some individuals might not meet standard MI diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSION: Diagnosing MI using only a 5-lead ECG can be challenging, as some patients may not exhibit MI findings. Modern monitors that numerically display ST segment depression, along with the availability of continuous 12lead ECG in the operating theater, can improve emergency detection. In resource-limited countries, adopting new protocols for MI management is crucial. These protocols should include initiating MI treatments even without a confirmed diagnosis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine and phenylephrine are commonly used vasoactive drugs to treat hypotension during the perioperative period. The increased release of endogenous norepinephrine elicits prothrombotic changes, while parturients are generally in a hypercoagulable state. Therefore, this trial aims to investigate whether there is a disparity between equivalent doses of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion and phenylephrine infusion on prothrombotic response in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty-six eligible parturients will be recruited for this trial and randomly assigned to the norepinephrine or phenylephrine group. The "study drug" will be administered at a rate of 15 ml/h starting from the intrathecal injection. The primary outcome are plasma coagulation factor VIII activity (FVIII: C), fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels. The secondary outcomes include hemodynamic variables and umbilical artery blood pH value. DISCUSSION: Our study is the first trial comparing the effect of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on prothrombotic response in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Positive or negative results will all help us better understand the impact of vasoactive drugs on patients. If there are any differences, this trial will provide new evidence for maternal choice of vasoactive medications in the perioperative period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300077164. Registered on 1 November 2023. https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .
Assuntos
Anestesia Obstétrica , Raquianestesia , Cesárea , Norepinefrina , Fenilefrina , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Vasoconstritores , Humanos , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Norepinefrina/sangue , Método Duplo-Cego , Gravidez , Fenilefrina/administração & dosagem , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Adulto , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/metabolismo , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/análise , Fator VIII , Resultado do Tratamento , Coagulação Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
Objective: Each repeat cesarean section (CS) potentially adds surgical complexity. The determination of appropriate anesthesia strategy to meet the surgical challenge is of crucial importance for the maternal and neonatal outcome. Study design: This prospective cohort study was conducted from 1-Jan-2021 to 31-Dec-2021 at a single large obstetric centre of all repeat CS. We compared the characteristics and the appropriateness of the anesthesia techniques for low-order repeat CS (LOR-CS) (1 or 2 previous CS) and high order repat CS (HOR-CS) group (3 or more repeat CS). Results: During the study period, 1057 parturients met the study entry criteria, with 821 parturients in the LOR-CS group and 236 parturients in the HOR-CS group. The use of spinal anesthesia was more common for HOR-CS 84.3%. Overall surgical time varied between LOR-CS (38 min, 29-49) and HOR-CS (42 min, 31-57) (p = 0.004).The rate of moderate and severe adhesions was relatively high in HOR-CS and the duration of overall surgical time for cases with mild adhesions was 38 min (29-48), for moderate adhesions was 44 min (34.8-56.5), and for severe adhesions was 56 min (44.8-74.3). There was no significant difference in the Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) between LOR-CS and HOR-CS, with values of 653 ± 292 ml vs. 660 ± 285 ml, respectively. Conclusion: Our data indicate that spinal anesthesia, standard monitoring and regular anesthetic setup are safe and suitable for the majority of HOR-CS, except in cases with high suspicion of placental accreta spectrum.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between timing of indwelling catheter removal and urinary retention after cesarean. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight hospitals in suburban, rural, and urban Colorado and Montana. PARTICIPANTS: Women who gave birth by cesarean from January 1, 2021, to April 30, 2022 (N = 3,496). METHODS: We categorized participants who gave birth between January 1, 2021, and June 29, 2021, (before implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiative) into Group A and participants who gave birth between July 1, 2021, and April 30, 2022, (after implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiative) into Group B. We used descriptive statistics to report the proportion of participants in both groups who experienced urinary retention after birth. We performed chi-square tests to determine the association between the time of catheter removal and incidence of urinary retention. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine the association between length of stay and urinary retention. RESULTS: Urinary retention rates were 5.8% in Group A and 12.6% in Group B (p < .001). In both groups, participants who received epidural anesthesia experienced significantly more urinary retention than those who received spinal anesthesia (p < .001). Participants who received epidural anesthesia and experienced urinary retention pushed 16.9% longer than those without urinary retention (p < .001). The proportion of participants who experienced urinary retention after catheter removal was 19.4% at 7 hours, 4.6% at 16 hours, and 9.9% at 12 hours after birth. Length of stay was determined to be inconclusive. CONCLUSION: We determined that the optimal time of catheter removal to minimize the rate of urinary retention was 12 to 16 hours after cesarean among women who received morphine sulfate as the spinal anesthesia.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is used in lumbar surgery, but initial adequate analgesia fails in some patients. In these cases, spinal redosing or conversion to general endotracheal anesthesia is required, both of which are detrimental to the patient experience and surgical workflow. METHODS: We reviewed cases of lumbar surgery performed under SA from 2017-2021. We identified 12 cases of inadequate first dose and then selected 36 random patients as controls. We used a measurement tool to approximate the volume of the dural sac for each patient using T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging sequences. RESULTS: Patients who had an inadequate first dose of anesthesia had a significantly larger dural sac volume, 22.8 ± 7.9 cm3 in the inadequate dose group and 17.4 ± 4.7 cm3 in controls (P = 0.043). The inadequate dose group was significantly younger, 54.2 ± 8.8 years in failed first dose and 66.4 ± 11.9 years in controls (P = 0.001). The groups did not differ by surgical procedure (P = 0.238), level (P = 0.353), American Society of Anesthesia score (P = 0.546), or comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: We found that age, larger height, and dural sac volume are risk factors for an inadequate first dose of SA. The availability of spinal magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing spine surgery allows the preoperative measurement of their thecal sac size. In the future, these data may be used to personalize spinal anesthesia dosing on the basis of individual anatomic variables and potentially reduce the incidence of failed spinal anesthesia in spine surgery.
Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Vértebras Lombares , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Raquianestesia/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dura-Máter/cirurgia , Dura-Máter/diagnóstico por imagem , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is commonly used within the specialties of orthopedic surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, spine surgery, and general surgery, and offers several benefits over general anesthesia (GA). However, SA is used much less frequently in plastic surgery. This review analyzed currently existing data on SA use across various surgical specialties and compared the benefits and complications of SA to those of GA, to assess its utility and potential for more widespread use in plastic surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases to evaluate the utility of SA in plastic surgery. Indications, contraindications, and data on the use of SA across various surgical specialties were reviewed. Benefits, complications, and cost-effectiveness were also assessed. Finally, the utility of SA in plastic surgery was evaluated based on the available literature. RESULTS: SA has been shown to yield several benefits and fewer risks than GA, including a higher possibility of early discharge, decreased costs, better pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting control, and decreased risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: Although commonly used for procedures across various surgical specialties such as obstetrics and gynecology, urology, and orthopedic surgery, SA is less frequently used within plastic surgery. Plastic surgery procedures that would benefit from the use of SA include those below the umbilicus such as liposuction, lower extremity procedures, and perineal procedures, and owing to its benefits, we recommend that SA be used more often within plastic surgery under appropriate clinical circumstances.
Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Anestesia Geral/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Preoperative anxiety can negatively impact patient outcomes by influencing the intraoperative requirements for anesthetics and analgesics, increasing postoperative pain intensity, and augmenting the need for analgesia. Moreover, it may contribute to higher rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality following certain types of surgery. This study investigates the anxiolytic and sedative properties of sublingual melatonin as a premedication agent in young females undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in Nasiriyah, Iraq. Eighty females were included, 40 in each group, based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Premedication was administered in the morning, 60 minutes before the procedure. In the melatonin group (M), patients received 10 mg of sublingual melatonin, while the placebo group (P) received placebo premedication. Anxiety and sedation levels were evaluated three times: before taking premedication, five minutes before the insertion of the spinal needle, and one hour postoperatively, using the visual analog scale and Richmond Sedation Scale. RESULTS: The results show a highly significant P-value regarding anxiety levels between the M Group and P Group (p-value < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the median sedation scores between the studied groups at pre-spinal insertion and postoperatively (p-value < 0.001). The mean heart rate in the M Group was significantly lower than in the P Group (p-value = 0.0019). Significant differences were noted in systolic and diastolic blood pressures between the two groups, measured five minutes before and after spinal needle insertion (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings contribute to understanding the impact of sublingual melatonin as an anxiolytic and sedative premedication agent on patients undergoing elective cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia. Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the benefits and implications of melatonin administration in such procedures.
RESUMO
Background: Spinal anesthesia is commonly performed for cesarean section, however, postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of its most common adverse effects. Ondansetron is an antiemetic for cancer treatment and analgesia-induced nausea and vomiting. In this study, the authors aim to evaluate the effect of postoperative ondansetron on PDPH. Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial study, 120 pregnant patients are ASA ll, undergoing elective cesarean section, were randomized into two groups (placebo or study). The patients in the study group, immediately after the birth of a baby and 24 h after the operation, received ondansetron 4 mg IV while the placebo group received a placebo. The severity and incidence of headache, postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizziness, neck and lower back pain, and the use of analgesia was assessed in the two groups. Results: The significant meaning of the time effect (P<0.001) indicated that regardless of the group, for each unit increase in time, the chance of developing a headache increased by 23%, which was statistically significant. Also, the significant meaning of the group effect indicated that regardless of time, patients who did not take indomethacin had ~4.11 times higher chances of developing a headache compared to those who received the medication, which was statistically significant (P=0.004). Conclusion: The administration of ondansetron significantly reduces the occurrence of postspinal anesthesia headaches and neck pain. There was no significant difference in headache severity between the two study groups.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of carbohydrate loading prior to the cesarean surgery under spinal anesthesia on thiols and ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) levels. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study. METHODS: Seventy-nine pregnant women planned for cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia at Karaman Training and Research Hospital were randomized into a control group (group C) (n = 42), and an oral carbohydrate preloading group (group OCH) (n = 37). OCH loading requires consuming 400 mL the night before surgery and 200 mL up to 2 hours before anesthesia. Group OCH consumed an oral carbohydrate-rich beverage (Nutricia-Fantomalt), and group C consumed an equal volume of water. This study investigated thiol-disulfide homeostasis after preoperative carbohydrate consumption. Preoperative gastric fluid, volume, antral cross-sectional area, hypotension following the birth, and fetal blood gas parameters were compared across groups. FINDINGS: Thiols and IMA levels did not differ across groups before and after surgery (P > .05). Gastric ultrasonography showed similar antral cross-sectional area and stomach volume between groups (P = .172, P = .128, respectively). When surgery caused hypotension, group OCH received more ephedrine for surgery-induced hypotension, although this difference is not statistically significant (P = .704). A clustered error bar (95% confidence interval) plot with an interpolation line was used for a time-based comparison of mean differences in heart rate and mean arterial pressure between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that mothers' thiols and IMA levels were unaffected by preoperative OCH loading before cesarean surgery. We did not examine thiol and its derivatives in umbilical cord blood; hence, we can not comment on thiol/disulfide homeostasis levels in neonates.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This prospective study investigated the feasibility of performing laparoscopic pelvic surgery under spinal anesthesia and analyzed the intraoperative side effects, like pain, nausea, and vomitus, of 915 patients. METHODS: The implementation and performance of laparoscopic surgery under local anesthesia on 915 patients (out of a total of 3212 who underwent laparoscopic pelvic surgery under spinal anesthesia) were analyzed in relation to BMI (body mass index), obesity, pain during surgery, amount of intraperitoneal mmHg CO2 gas pressure, and surgical complications. RESULTS: BMI > 30, intra-abdominal adhesions, increased duration of the operation, bleeding, and increased intraperitoneal CO2 pressure were statistically significant as the main causes of pain during laparoscopic surgery under spinal anesthesia. Underweight patients, on the other hand, had less pain when intra-abdominal pressure increased compared to those of normal weight. The appearance of pain, nausea, and vomitus occurred in 10.3% of patients, and these events were easy to manage and treat. They did not affect the surgeon's work or the course of the operation. CONCLUSIONS: In light of these observations, we are proposing spinal anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery as the first choice in patients who have no contraindications. To the best of our knowledge, this clinical study constitutes the largest clinical observation and dataset concerning spinal anesthesia in laparoscopic pelvic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN38987, 10 December 2019.
RESUMO
Monopulmonary patients undergoing major abdominal surgery represent a high-risk population. While general anesthesia is typically the standard approach, mechanical ventilation can cause significant complications, particularly in patients with pre-existing lung conditions. Tailored anesthesia strategies are essential to mitigate these risks and preserve respiratory function. We present the case of a 71-year-old female with a history of prior right pneumonectomy for lung cancer. She was scheduled for combined left nephrectomy and left hemicolectomy laparotomic surgery because of extended colon cancer. The patient was prepared according to the local Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol and underwent thoracic neuraxial anesthesia with sedation maintaining spontaneous breathing, so avoiding general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. Anesthesia in the surgical field was effective, and no respiratory problems occurred intraoperatively. The patient's rapid recovery and early discharge underscore the success of our "tailored anesthesia strategy." Our experience highlights the feasibility and benefits of tailored anesthesia in monopulmonary patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. By avoiding general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation, we mitigated risks and optimized patient outcomes, emphasizing the importance of individualized approaches in high-risk surgical populations.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients often desire involvement in anesthesia decisions, yet clinicians rarely explain anesthesia options or elicit preferences. We developed My Anesthesia Choice-Hip Fracture, a conversation aid about anesthesia options for hip fracture surgery and tested its preliminary efficacy and acceptability. METHODS: We developed a 1-page, tabular format, plain-language conversation aid with feedback from anesthesiologists, decision scientists, and community advisors. We conducted an online survey of English-speaking adults aged 50 and older. Participants imagined choosing between spinal and general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Before and after viewing the aid, participants answered a series of questions regarding key outcomes, including decisional conflict, knowledge about anesthesia options, and acceptability of the aid. RESULTS: Of 364/409 valid respondents, mean age was 64 (SD 8.9) and 59% were female. The proportion indicating decisional conflict decreased after reviewing the aid (63-34%, P < 0.001). Median knowledge scores increased from 50% correct to 67% correct (P < 0.001). 83% agreed that the aid would help them discuss options and preferences. 76.4% would approve of doctors using it. CONCLUSION: My Anesthesia Choice-Hip Fracture decreased decisional conflict and increased knowledge about anesthesia choices for hip fracture surgery. Respondents assessed it as acceptable for use in clinical settings. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Use of clinical decision aids may increase shared decision-making; further testing is warranted.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Humanos , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Raquianestesia/métodos , Participação do Paciente/métodos , Tomada de Decisões , Comportamento de EscolhaRESUMO
A weakened immune system and more inflammatory cytokines being released are possible effects of the surgical stress that a cesarean section induces. This kind of reaction, in addition to the altered reaction to catecholamines, has the potential to significantly affect the immune system of the mother and the patients' general postoperative course. This prospective study compared the plasma levels of catecholamines and cytokines in healthy pregnant patients having cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia. A total of 30 pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean sections were divided into two groups: 15 who received general anesthesia (GA) and 15 who received spinal anesthesia (SA). Blood samples were collected from all subjects before anesthesia induction (pre-OP), 6 h postoperatively (6 h post-OP), and 12 h (12 h post-OP), to measure levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-4, IL-10, norepinephrine (NE), and epinephrine (EPI). When we compared the two groups, we discovered that only IL-6 and IL-4 had significantly higher levels pre-OP, whereas all studied cytokines exhibited an increase in the GA versus SA group at 6 and 12 h post-OP. In the case of catecholamines, we discovered that serum levels are positively related with pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory cytokines, depending on the time of day and type of anesthetic drugs. Compared to SA, GA has a more consistent effect on the inflammatory response and catecholamine levels. The findings of this study confirm that the type of anesthesia can alter postoperative immunomodulation to various degrees via changes in cytokine and catecholamine production. SA could be a preferable choice for cesarean section because it is an anesthetic method that reduces perioperative stress and allows for less opioid administration, impacting cytokine production with proper immunomodulation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spine surgery accounts for a large proportion of neurosurgical procedures, with approximately 313 million spine surgeries conducted annually worldwide. Considering delayed recovery and postoperative complications that are commonly reported, there has been a recent shift toward minimally invasive spine procedures conducted under local anesthesia. Despite proven success, there exists a limited body of literature on the use of awake surgery in spinal procedures. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis was conducted to map the current landscape of work in this field. 190 articles were identified from the Web of Science (Clarivate, NY) database. A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was performed on a narrowed list of the most relevant articles using Bibliometrix, an R-based programming tool. RESULTS: There has been a rise in academic papers published on the topic of awake spine surgery since 2016, with an increase in publication count by approximately 18% annually and each article cited approximately ten times on average to date. The year 2022 saw an uptick in publications, with 9 throughout the entire year. The most impactful article, with a total of 95 citations, was published by Sairyo et al.1 Thematic analysis revealed that the terms "lumbar spine" and "stenosis" are well-developed topics in the literature, whereas the topics of "complications," "fusion," and "cost-analysis" are less well-developed topics. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the most-cited articles in the field of awake spine surgery. Specifically, it identifies areas that are well represented in the literature and those which are underrepresented and should be areas of continued future research.
Assuntos
Bibliometria , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Vigília , Humanos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative hypotension remains a serious adverse event of photodynamic diagnosis-assisted transurethral resection of bladder tumor with oral administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid. We conducted a re-analysis of perioperative hypotension in photodynamic diagnosis-assisted transurethral resection of the bladder tumor with oral 5-aminolevulinic acid to ascertain its safety. METHODS: A total of 407 cases who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors in our institution were reviewed (274 cases for the PDD group with photodynamic diagnosis and 133 for the white light (WL) group without). A classification of hypotension severity was devised to identify risk factors for clinically troublesome hypotension. The distribution of hypotension severity in each of the PDD and WL groups was compared. Additionally, the patient background and perioperative data by hypotension severity were compared only in the PDD group. RESULTS: More patients with moderate and severe hypotension were noted in the PDD group. The renal function was lower with increasing hypotension severity in the PDD group. More patients on general anesthesia were included in the mild and moderate hypotension group, whereas more patients on spinal anesthesia were included in the severe hypotension group. Furthermore, the frequency of side effects other than hypotension tended to increase with hypotension severity. CONCLUSIONS: Renal function impairment and the other adverse effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid may be risk factors for severe hypotension. Mild or moderate hypotension may be caused by general anesthesia and severe hypotension may be caused by spinal anesthesia. To elucidate specific risk factors, further case-control studies are warranted.
Assuntos
Ácido Aminolevulínico , Hipotensão , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Ácido Aminolevulínico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Aminolevulínico/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Hipotensão/etiologia , Hipotensão/diagnóstico , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Ressecção Transuretral de BexigaRESUMO
Spinal anesthesia is one of the most widely used techniques in modern anesthesia practice. It involves the injection of local anesthetic drugs into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within the subarachnoid space. The choice of drug, its concentration, and baricity play a crucial role in determining the characteristics of the spinal block and has evolved over the years with continuous advancements in drug formulations and administration methods. Spinal anesthesia with hypobaric drugs represents a valuable technique in the armamentarium of anesthesiologists, offering distinct advantages in terms of targeted action, reduced systemic toxicity, and enhanced hemodynamic stability. This review aims to scan the characteristics of hypobaric drugs, factors influencing their spread within the spinal canal, challenges associated with their use, clinical applications in various surgical scenarios, and potential implications for patient outcomes and healthcare practice. PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant articles and a total of 23 relevant articles were selected for the review based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Hypobaric drugs have many advantages in high-risk morbidly ill patients for some select surgical procedures and daycare surgeries. The concentration and volume of hypobaric drugs need to be selected according to the extensiveness of the surgery and the desired block can be achieved by giving spinal injection in specific positions. The dynamic field of anesthesiology encompasses the integration of emerging technologies and evidence-based practices, which will contribute to further refining the safety and efficacy of spinal anesthesia with hypobaric drugs.
RESUMO
Morgagni hernias are uncommon diaphragmatic defects and are commonly found incidentally as a congenital defect. Acquired Morgagni hernias have been documented in the pediatric population, making them extremely uncommon. Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia (TSSA) may be used as a successful substitute for general anesthesia, especially in cardiovascularly compromised patients like our patient who had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and this is one of the very few documented cases of acquired Morgagni hernia laparoscopic repair surgery done by this anesthesia method. An 80-year-old woman presented with a complaint of left lower chest and left upper quadrant pain. Acute coronary artery syndrome was ruled out. She underwent a coronary artery bypass graft in 2009, complicated two months later by mediastinitis, which is believed to be the cause of the acquired diaphragmatic defect in our patient. Chest and abdominal CT showed a large anterior Morgagni-type diaphragmatic hernia, in which the left hemithorax and anterior mediastinum were both occupied by a herniated transverse colon. Under regional anesthesia, which was done by injecting anesthesia in the spinal space between thoracic spinal vertebrae T8 and T9 and second injections in the epidural space at the level between thoracic epidural T9 and T10, which is neuraxial anesthesia. The repair of the diaphragmatic hernia was done by suturing the mesh into the proper position. We report the first known case of laparoscopic repair of a Morgagni hernia in an adult patient with HFrEF and other comorbidities.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is used for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery, but frequently induces hypotension and the causative factors remain unclear. We examined background factors for the use of an intraoperative vasopressor in elderly patients receiving spinal anesthesia for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 203 patients >75 years (mean age, 87.9 years) with femoral trochanteric fractures who underwent short nail fixation under orthopedically managed spinal anesthesia at our hospital between April 2020 and July 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (intraoperative vasopressor) and group B (no vasopressor). The following data were compared: age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, antihypertensive medication, years of experience as a primary surgeon, bupivacaine dose, puncture level, anesthesia time, operation time, hemoglobin level and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio on the day of surgery, brain natriuretic peptide level, left ventricular ejection fraction, and percentage of patients operated on the day of transport. RESULTS: There were 65 patients in group A and 138 in group B. The average dose of bupivacaine was 11.7 mg. In a univariate analysis, group A was slightly younger (87.0 vs. 88.3 years), had a higher blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (27.1 vs. 24.5), more frequently received ß-blockers (14.1% vs. 5.8 %) and diuretic medications (21.9% vs. 11.6 %), and had a higher puncture level. A logistic regression analysis identified younger age (p = 0.02) and diuretic medication (p = 0.001) as independent risk factors in group A. Vasopressor use was more frequent at a higher puncture level in group A (57 % for L2/3, 33 % for L3/4, 15 % for L4/5, 0 % for L5/S). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension is attributed to volume deficit or extensive sympathetic blockade and may be prevented by avoiding high puncture levels and increasing preoperative fluid supplementation in patients on diuretics. There is currently no consensus on anesthetic dosages.