A Case Report on Acute Visual Loss With Ophthalmoplegia Following Spine Surgery.

Postoperative vision loss is an unusual but serious side effect that can occur after nonocular surgeries, particularly those involving the heart or spine. Various causes, including ischemic optic neuropathy, central retinal artery occlusion, central retinal vein occlusion, and ischemic orbital compartment syndrome, can cause this condition. Here, we present a case of a 28-year-old male patient who underwent spine surgery for cervicodorsal spine injury and experienced sudden, painless vision loss in his left eye following the surgery. On examination, his right eye had a bedside vision of >3/60, while his left eye could only perceive light. The patient's left eye showed mild axial proptosis, supraorbital edema, conjunctival congestion, chemosis, relative afferent papillary defect, and restricted eye movements in all gazes. Fundus examination of the left eye showed pale retina, optic disc pallor, severely attenuated retinal vessels, and an absent cherry red spot suggesting ophthalmic artery occlusion. The right eye anterior segment and fundus findings were normal. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and orbit showed mild preseptal thickening in the left orbit, and magnetic resonance venography was normal. This case report is noteworthy in that an ophthalmic artery occlusion has been identified as the cause of sudden, unilateral, painless vision loss associated with ophthalmoplegia subsequent to a spinal surgical procedure.

Spine surgical site infection outcome with preoperative application of a pre-saturated 10% povidone-iodine nasal decolonization product in a 32-bed surgical hospital.

BACKGROUND: To pursue an irreducible minimum overall surgical site infection (SSI) rate, a 32-bed surgical hospital employed an outside consultant and performed sterile processing and surgery internal audits: no obvious improvements were identified. A ten-year review determined 70% of SSI's were spine procedure patients. After a nasal decolonization product literature review an intervention was implemented. The purpose of this study was to assess if the intervention impacted spine SSI rates. METHODS: A 36-month implementation science study was conducted. The 18-month intervention was immediate preoperative application of a manufactured pre-saturated 10% povidone iodine nasal decolonization product in spine surgery patients, with monthly product application documentation surveillance feedback to the preoperative staff. Chi-square test was used to determine the difference in types of spine SSI surgery rates pre and post intervention. RESULTS: Overall spine SSI decreased 35.7% (p=0.04) with 58.7% reduction in superficial incisional SSI (p=0.02). The 16.1% decline in deep incisional SSI was not significant (p=0.29). CONCLUSION: Within this hospital, conducting 7,576 surgical spine procedures over 36-months, with the immediate preoperative application of a pre-saturated ten percent povidone-iodine nasal decolonization product, the only intervention in SSI prevention protocol, produced a statistically significant decrease in spine patient SSI rate percent.

Mortality risk factors for adult trauma patients treated with halo brace for cervical spine fracture.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Halo braces treat upper cervical spine fractures and serve as the most rigid form of external immobilization. Recently, halo braces have lost favor due to known complications and advances in surgical stabilization. This study aims to determine the contemporary incidence for use of halo braces and identify risk factors associated with mortality in trauma patients undergoing halo brace for cervical spine fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database was queried for patients ≥18 years-old with a cervical spine fracture undergoing halo brace. Patients sustaining penetrating trauma and severe torso injuries (abbreviated injury scale >3 for the abdomen or thorax) were excluded. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: From 144,434 patients with a cervical spine fracture, 272 (0.2%) underwent halo brace and 14 (5%) of these died. Those who died were older (73.5 vs. 53 years-old, p = 0.011) and had higher rates of hypertension (78.6% vs 33.1%, p < 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (14.3% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 (46.2% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001) and cervical spinal cord injury (71.4% vs. 21.3%, p < 0.001) were more common in patients who died. In addition, those who died more often sustained respiratory complications (7.1% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.004) and sepsis (7.1% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.004). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, only Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 (OR 19.77, 3.04-128.45, p = 0.002) was associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Only 5% of cervical spine fracture patients undergoing halo brace died. Respiratory complications and sepsis were more common in those who died. On multivariable analysis only Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 remained an independent associated risk factor for mortality.

Recent Global Trends and Hotspots in Occipitocervical Fusion: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Study.

Occipitocervical arthrodesis has a variety of indications to treat craniocervical and atlantoaxial pathologies for which a selective cervical fusion would not provide sufficient stability. Over time, the indications for occipitocervical fusions (OCF) have evolved, as new technologies and surgical techniques were developed. In this bibliometric analysis, we aim to explore the progression of OCF literature over time, analyzing the trends in publications and citations, publishing countries and authors, keywords and topics. The Web of Science database was used for data retrieval on July 3rd, 2024, with the search "occipitocervical fusion" OR "occipito-cervical fusion" OR "occipitocervical arthrodesis" OR "occipital cervical fusion" OR "occipital cervical arthrodesis" OR ("OCF" AND "spine surgery"). Excel was used to create the citation analysis and publication trend figures, along with the publishing countries and author analysis. The bibliometric software VosViewer was used to generate the keyword co-occurrence network visualizations. Overall, 762 articles were extracted. The number of pertinent publications and citations increased until 2020 before beginning to decrease. We found that Ehlers Danlos syndrome (EDS) has become a more prevalent topic, as the association between EDS and craniocervical instability has received further scrutiny. "Dysphagia" continues to be a commonly cited topic, while, conversely, rheumatoid arthritis has decreased in publication frequency, possibly related to advances in medical management and surgical techniques. Overall, the United States of America, China, and Japan are the top publishing countries. This analysis of OCF literature provides a helpful overview of emerging trends and clinician concerns, especially as seen through the perspective of time.

Evaluating the Adherence of Large Language Models to Surgical Guidelines: A Comparative Analysis of Chatbot Recommendations and North American Spine Society (NASS) Coverage Criteria.

Background There has been a significant increase in cervical fusion procedures, both anterior and posterior, across the United States. Despite this upward trend, limited research exists on adherence to evidence-based medicine (EBM) guidelines for cervical fusion, highlighting a gap between recommended practices and surgeon preferences. Additionally, patients are increasingly utilizing large language models (LLMs) to aid in decision-making. Methodology This observational study evaluated the capacity of four LLMs, namely, Bard, BingAI, ChatGPT-3.5, and ChatGPT-4, to adhere to EBM guidelines, specifically the 2023 North American Spine Society (NASS) cervical fusion guidelines. Ten clinical vignettes were created based on NASS recommendations to determine when fusion was indicated. This novel approach assessed LLM performance in a clinical decision-making context without requiring institutional review board approval, as no human subjects were involved. Results No LLM achieved complete concordance with NASS guidelines, though ChatGPT-4 and Bing Chat exhibited the highest adherence at 60%. Discrepancies were notably observed in scenarios involving head-drop syndrome and pseudoarthrosis, where all LLMs failed to align with NASS recommendations. Additionally, only 25% of LLMs agreed with NASS guidelines for fusion in cases of cervical radiculopathy and as an adjunct to facet cyst resection. Conclusions The study underscores the need for improved LLM training on clinical guidelines and emphasizes the importance of considering the nuances of individual patient cases. While LLMs hold promise for enhancing guideline adherence in cervical fusion decision-making, their current performance indicates a need for further refinement and integration with clinical expertise to ensure optimal patient care. This study contributes to understanding the role of AI in healthcare, advocating for a balanced approach that leverages technological advancements while acknowledging the complexities of surgical decision-making.

Beyond the Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Navigation Spine Surgery: Refinement of Outcomes With Extended Experience.

Objective This study assessed whether robotic-assisted navigation (RAN) spine surgery outcomes, including operative time and pedicle screw accuracy, continue to improve with extended experience beyond 200 cases. Methods This is a retrospective review of 60 patients who underwent lumbosacral transforaminal interbody fusion using RAN. Patients were segmented into three groups of 20 consecutive cases each. The first group represented a surgical performance baseline leading up to the investigating surgeon's 200th RAN case. The subsequent two groups were selected beyond the 200th case with an average of 15 cases between groups. Pedicle screw accuracy and intraoperative outcomes were assessed. Statistical results were significant if p<0.05. Results Measures of surgical efficiency significantly improved beyond the investigating surgeon's 200th RAN case. As case number increased, the following parameters significantly decreased: registration time (group 1: 16.9±6.5, group 2: 12.9±3.0, group 3: 8.7±1.6 minutes; p<0.05), screw insertion time (group 1: 14.9±3.5, group 2: 10.9±2.0, group 3: 8.4±2.7 minutes; p<0.05), and total operative time significantly decreased from group 1 (175.9±58.2 minutes) to group 2 (135.8±23.9 minutes) (p=0.013) with a non-significant decrease to group 3 (121.5±32.3 minutes). Accuracy (Grade = A) significantly increased across groups (group 1: 87%, group 2: 94%, group 3: 98%; p=0.024). Group 1 had the highest misplacement rate of 3.7% (4/108 screws). The overall misplacement rate was 1.4% (4/290 screws) (Grade C-E). There was a higher rate of lateral screw misplacement compared to medial misplacement. Conclusion Even with a small number of initial cases, RAN spine surgery can consistently be performed with high accuracy and acceptable intraoperative outcomes. However, this study demonstrated refined outcomes with extended robotic experience.

Open Reduction in Traumatic Cervical Facet Dislocation Does Not Delay Time to Treatment.

Background Cervical facet dislocation is a serious injury that can result in permanent neurologic damage. Current guidelines recommend immediate closed reduction of cervical dislocations, though the efficacy of this practice remains a debate. This study aims to evaluate whether immediate open reduction and fixation of cervical dislocations offer equal or better outcomes for patients and limit the need for follow-up operations. Methods This is a retrospective study including patients who presented to the emergency department of a single institution from 2008 to 2023 with cervical facet dislocation. Patients were divided into groups based on initial treatment: either open or closed reduction. Time to surgery was calculated as the time between arrival to the ED and incision time in the OR. Primary outcomes were improvement in motor and sensory deficits at six-week post-operative follow-up. Results There were 31 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Time to treatment did not differ significantly between the open versus closed reduction groups. There were no differences between groups in improvement in motor function, sensory function, or pain at the six-week follow-up. All patients treated with initial closed reduction ultimately required surgical stabilization. Conclusions Open reduction as a first-line treatment did not increase the time to treatment for patients with cervical facet dislocations. Patients had equivalent functional outcomes in both treatment groups. The findings suggest that current practice guidelines may delay definitive treatment without improving patient safety or outcomes.

Comparison of efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries: A systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis.

Background and Aims: Existing literature does not establish the superiority of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block or the thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block in pain relief and reducing opioid consumption in lumbar spine surgeries. This systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to discern their relative efficacy and safety. Methods: This meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESP and TLIP blocks in lumbar spine surgeries. The primary outcome was 24-h opioid consumption, and secondary outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 1 h and 24 h and various complications. PubMed, Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, EMBASE databases and cross-references were electronically searched. Two authors extracted data independently, cross-checked, and analysed them using RevMan 5.4. Binary outcomes were reported as odds ratios (OR), while continuous outcomes were presented as standardised mean differences (SMDs) accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: Among 1107 articles, six RCTs (492 patients) were finally included. The ESP block demonstrated lower 24-h opioid consumption compared to TLIP [SMD -0.32 (95% CI: -0.50, -0.14); P < 0.001, I 2 = 83%]. At 1 and 24 h, ESPB yielded significantly lower VAS scores compared to TLIP [1 h: SMD -0.38 (95% CI: -0.57, -0.18); P < 0.001, I 2 = 83%; 24 h: SMD -0.57 (95% CI: -0.76, -0.37); P < 0.001, I 2 = 73%]. No significant difference was noted in adverse events. Conclusion: In comparison to the TLIP block, the ESP block has significantly lower 24-h opioid consumption and VAS scores at 1 and 24 h in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Postendoscopic spine surgery bacterial meningitis requiring multiple surgical interventions: A complex case report.

An uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of spinal surgery is bacterial meningitis, To the best of our knowledge, all of the documented cases have developed following open procedures, likely due to the increased potential for cerebrospinal fluid exposure and dural injury associated with these approaches, and notably, none of these documented cases were due to an endoscopic surgical approach. The low prevalence of this condition explains the reasonable but unfortunate lack of information about its natural history and associated complications in the medical literature. We present a case of a patient who experienced bacterial meningitis following endoscopic surgical intervention for lumbar disc herniation. This complex case required multiple surgical procedures to achieve a complete resolution.

Post-operative Unilateral Visual Loss and Ophthalmoplegia following Cervical Spine Surgery in Prone Position: A Case Report.

ABSTRACT: Visual loss following a spine surgery in a prone position is a disastrous and irreversible complication. Moreover, the recommended treatment for such visual loss is lacking and the outcome is not so satisfactory. A 38-year-old gentleman developed profound right sided visual loss after an uneventful cervical spine surgery in a prone position that lasted approximately two and half hours. Immediate ophthalmic consultation was done and the case was diagnosed as right-sided central retinal artery occlusion. Despite the initiation of vasodilatation, anticoagulation, and adequate fluid infusion, satisfactory improvement was not achieved. Extensive review of pertinent literature highlighted limited efficacy of treatments for postoperative visual loss after prone spinal surgery, further emphasizing the importance of preventive measures as the cornerstone in such procedures.

Cerebrovascular pulsatility indicates preoperative subcortical cognitive impairment and an increased risk for postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing elective spine surgery.

Introduction: Advances in spine surgery enable safe interventions in elderly patients, but perioperative neurocognitive disorders (pNCD), such as post-operative delirium (POD) and cognitive dysfunction (POCD), remain a serious concern. Pre-operative cognitive impairment is a major risk factor for pNCD. Comprehensive pre-operative cognitive assessments are not feasible in clinical practice, making effective screening methods desirable. This study investigates whether pre-operative cerebrovascular duplex sonography can assess subcortical (vascular) cognitive impairment and the risk for POD. Methods: This prospective single-center study recruited patients aged ≥60 years scheduled for elective spine surgery at a German university hospital. Patients underwent pre-operative assessments including cognitive abilities (CERAD test battery), structural MRI, and cerebrovascular duplex sonography. POD screening was conducted three times daily for at least 3 days. The primary hypothesis, that the mean pulsatility index (PI) of both internal carotid arteries (ICA) predicts POD risk, was tested using logistic regression. Secondary analyses examined the association between POD risk and ICA flow (time-averaged peak velocities, TAPV) and correlations with cognitive profiles and MRI characteristics. Results: POD occurred in 22% of patients (n = 22/99) within three postoperative days. Patients with POD were significantly older (75.9 ± 5.4 vs. 70.0 ± 6.9 years, p < 0.01) but did not differ by gender (p = 0.51). ICA PI significantly predicted POD risk (OR = 5.46 [95%CI: 1.81-16.49], p = 0.003), which remained significant after adjustment for age and duration of surgery (ORadj = 6.38 [95% CI: 1.77-23.03], p = 0.005). TAPV did not inform the POD risk (p = 0.68). ICA PI Pre-operative cognitive scores were significantly associated with ICA PI (mean CERAD score: r = -0.32, p < 0.001). ICA PI was also significantly associated with total white matter lesion volume (τ = 0.19, p = 0.012) and periventricular white matter lesion volume (τ = 0.21, p = 0.007). Discussion: This is the first study to demonstrate that cerebrovascular duplex sonography can assess the risk for POD in elderly spine surgery patients. Increased ICA PI may indicate subcortical impairment, larger white matter lesion load, and lower white matter volume, predisposing factors for POD. Pre-operative cerebrovascular duplex sonography of the ICA is widely available, easy-to-use, and efficient, offering a promising screening method for POD risk. Increased ICA PI could supplement established predictors like age to adjust surgical and peri-operative procedures to individual risk profiles.

Comparison of Postoperative Epidural Hematoma Formation Between Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery and Conventional Microscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) has become widely recognized as a minimally invasive method for spinal decompression and discectomy. However, postoperative epidural hematoma (POEH) presents a significant risk in spinal surgery due to its potential to compress neural elements and lead to neurological deficits. This study compares the clinical and radiological outcomes of BESS with those of conventional microscopic surgery. METHODS: In this single-center, single-blinded, actively controlled randomized clinical trial, 46 patients undergoing single-level posterior decompression or discectomy for spinal stenosis or herniated intervertebral discs were enrolled. Participants were randomly allocated to either the conventional microscopic surgery group or the BESS group. Experienced spine surgeons performed all procedures. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessments were conducted following the removal of the drain system. Outcome measures included the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the dura sac and POEH, as well as the incidence of neurological deficits. RESULTS: The demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients were similar across the 2 groups, with 24 in the conventional group and 22 in the BESS group. There were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative CSA of the dura sac between the groups. However, the BESS group exhibited a significantly larger CSA of POEH (0.36 ± 0.34 cm²) compared with the conventional group (0.17 ± 0.15 cm², P = 0.033). Despite this higher incidence of POEH, there was no corresponding increase in neurological deficits or revision surgeries. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that while BESS achieves decompression comparable to that of conventional microscopic surgery, it is associated with a higher incidence of epidural hematomas. Importantly, these hematomas did not result in an increased rate of neurological deterioration or the need for surgical interventions. Further studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up are required to confirm these results and further refine the BESS technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Despite a higher incidence of epidural hematomas, BESS offers comparable decompression to microscopic surgery without increased neurological risks, making it a viable, less invasive option for patient care.

An Experimental Model for Fluid Dynamics and Pressures During Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic spine surgery is an emerging technique of minimally invasive spine surgery. However, headache, seizure, and autonomic dysreflexia are possible irrigation-related complications following full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD). Pressure elevation through fluid irrigation may contribute to these adverse events. A validated experimental model to investigate parameters for guideline definition is lacking. This study aimed to create an experimental setting for FELD with pressure assessments to prove the concept of repeatable and sensitive measurement of intracranial, intra- and epidural pressures during spine endoscopy. METHODS: To measure intradural pressure, catheters were introduced through a sacral approach and advanced to lumbar, thoracic, and cervical levels in human cadavers. Similarly, lumbar epidural and intracranial probes were placed. The dural sac was filled with Ringer solution to a physiologic pressure of 15 cmH2O. Lumbar endoscopy was performed on 3 human cadavers at the L3-4 level. Pressure changes were measured continuously at all sites and the effects of backflow-occlusion were monitored. RESULTS: Reproducibility of the experimental model was validated with catheters at the correct locations and stable compartmental pressure baselines at all levels for 3 specimens (mean±standard deviation: 1.3±2.9 mmHg, 9.0±2.0 mmHg, 6.0±1.2 mmHg, respectively). Pressure increase could be detected sensitively by closing the system with backflow-occlusion. CONCLUSION: An experimental setup for feasible, repeatable, and precise pressure measurement during FELD in a human cadaveric setup has been developed. This allows investigation of the effects of endoscopic techniques and pump pressures on intra-, epidural and intracranial pressure and enables ranges of safe pump pressures per clinical situations.

Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Last 10 Years: A Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) employs small incisions and advanced techniques to minimize tissue damage while achieving similar outcomes to open surgery. MISS offers benefits such as reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs. This review analyzes complications associated with MISS over the last 10 years, highlighting common issues and the impact of technological advancements. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase via OVID, and Cochrane databases, covering publications from January 2013 to March 2024. Keywords related to MISS and complications were used. Studies on adult patients undergoing MISS with tubular, uniportal, or biportal endoscopy, reporting intraoperative or postoperative complications, were included. Non-English publications, abstracts, and small case series were excluded. Data on MISS approach, patient demographics, and complications were extracted and reviewed by 2 independent researchers. RESULTS: The search identified 880 studies, with 137 included after screening and exclusions. Key complications in cervical MISS were hematomas, transient nerve root palsy, and dural tears. In thoracic MISS, complications included cerebrospinal fluid leaks and durotomy. In lumbar MISS, common complications were incidental dural injuries, postoperative neuropathic conditions, and disc herniation recurrences. Complications varied by surgical approach. CONCLUSION: MISS offers reduced anatomical disruption compared to open surgery, potentially decreasing nerve injury risk. However, complications such as nerve injuries, durotomies, and hardware misplacement still occur. Intraoperative neuromonitoring and advanced technologies like navigation can help mitigate these risks. Despite variability in complication rates, MISS remains a safe, effective alternative with ongoing advancements enhancing its outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Comparison to Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.

OBJECTIVE: The unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (UBE-PCF) has been recently adopted for unilateral radiating arm pain due to cervical herniated intervertebral disc or foraminal stenosis. We systematically meta-analyzed clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and compared them with those of full-endoscopic PCF (FE-PCF). METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until February 29, 2024. Clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were collected and analyzed using the fixed-effect or random-effects model. Clinical outcomes of the UBE-PCF were compared with minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following PCF to evaluate the efficacy of UBE-PCF. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the random-effects meta-analysis, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) neck, and VAS arm were significantly decreased after the UBE-PCF (p<0.001). The improvement of NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm were significantly higher than MCID (p<0.05). The improvement of NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm were not significantly different between the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF (p>0.05). Overall incidence of complications of the UBE-PCF was 6.2% (24 of 390). The most common complication was dura tear (2.1%, 8 of 390). The incidence in overall complications was not significantly different between the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF (p=0.813). CONCLUSION: We found that the UBE-PCF significantly improved clinical outcomes. Regarding clinical outcomes and complications, the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were not significantly different. Therefore, the UBE-PCF would be an advantageous surgical option comparable to FE-PCF for unilateral radiating arm pain.

A Self-Developed Mobility Augmented Reality System Versus Conventional X-rays for Spine Positioning in Intraspinal Tumor Surgery: A Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a self-developed mobile augmented reality navigation system (MARNS) in guiding spinal level positioning during intraspinal tumor surgery based on a dual-error theory. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled patients diagnosed with intraspinal tumors admitted to Fujian Provincial Hospital between May and November 2023. The participants were divided into conventional x-rays and self-developed MARNS groups according to the localization methods they received. Position time, length of intraoperative incision variation, and location accuracy were systematically compared. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients (19 males) with intraspinal tumors were included, and MARNS was applied to 21 patients. MARNS achieved successful lesion localization in all patients with an error of 0.38±0.12 cm. Compared to x-rays, MARNS significantly reduced positioning time (129.00±13.03 seconds vs. 365.00±60.43 seconds, p<0.001) and length of intraoperative incision variation (0.14 cm vs. 0.67 cm, p=0.009). CONCLUSION: The self-developed MARNS, based on augmented reality technology for lesion visualization and perpendicular projection, offers a radiation-free complement to conventional x-rays.

Current Applications and Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery and Research: A Narrative Review and Commentary.

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly applied to the domain of spine surgery. We present a review of AI in spine surgery, including its use across all stages of the perioperative process and applications for research. We also provide commentary regarding future ethical considerations of AI use and how it may affect surgeon-industry relations. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed articles that examined applications of AI during the pre-, intra-, or postoperative spine surgery process. We also discussed the relationship among AI, spine industry partners, and surgeons. RESULTS: Preoperatively, AI has been mainly applied to image analysis, patient diagnosis and stratification, decision-making. Intraoperatively, AI has been used to aid image guidance and navigation. Postoperatively, AI has been used for outcomes prediction and analysis. AI can enable curation and analysis of huge datasets that can enhance research efforts. Large amounts of data are being accrued by industry sources for use by their AI platforms, though the inner workings of these datasets or algorithms are not well known. CONCLUSIONS: AI has found numerous uses in the pre-, intra-, or postoperative spine surgery process, and the applications of AI continue to grow. The clinical applications and benefits of AI will continue to be more fully realized, but so will certain ethical considerations. Making industry-sponsored databases open source, or at least somehow available to the public, will help alleviate potential biases and obscurities between surgeons and industry and will benefit patient care.

Herniated Disc Causing Foraminal Stenosis and Compression of the Unilateral Exiting Nerve Root at C5-C6: A Case Report.

This case report describes the use of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) for treating a 40-year-old female patient with cervical radiculopathy caused by a herniated disc at C5-C6, which had led to foraminal stenosis and nerve root compression. The patient presented with a one-year history of neck pain radiating to the right upper limb, accompanied by tingling sensations. Imaging revealed loss of cervical lordosis, disc dehydration, and a right-sided foraminal disc protrusion. The patient underwent a right-sided cervical UBE with C5-C6 discectomy and foraminotomy. Postoperatively, the pain was significantly reduced, with improvement in MacNab's grade and visual analog scale scores for neck pain and radiating pain of the upper limb at one- and three-month follow-ups. The procedure demonstrated the effectiveness of UBE in achieving good clinical outcomes with minimal complications, such as reduced soft tissue damage, minimal blood loss, and preserved spinal stability.

Clinical Oversight and Delayed Diagnosis of a Pathological Compression Fracture Causing Paraplegia.

While osteoporosis is the primary cause of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), it's crucial to promptly recognize pathological fractures through comprehensive diagnostic tests, including vertebral biopsies, to determine the exact etiology. For instance, a 66-year-old male with osteoporosis experienced worsening lower limb weakness and back pain after an initial vertebroplasty for a T12 compression fracture. Subsequent MRI revealed severe circumferential extradural compression at T12, leading to further surgeries that eventually uncovered metastatic adenocarcinoma from a pancreatic tumor. This case highlights the importance of precise diagnosis through vertebral biopsy and the necessity of sufficient ventral decompression or corpectomy, coupled with extensive laminectomy, to address severe neurological impairments like paraplegia. Prompt and accurate interventions can significantly improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Best practices guidelines in the postoperative management of patients who underwent cervical and lumbar fusions.

Background: There is a lack of standardization in spine surgery in particular, as relates to postoperative care for the most common spine procedures such as cervical and lumbar fusions. The goal of this study was to develop a standardized postoperative treatment protocol for common spine procedures such as cervical and lumbar fusion to reduce unnecessary visits, imaging studies, and create a standard for all spine surgeons to adhere while maintaining quality. Methods: We developed a best practices protocol (BPP) for postoperative spine care for anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). We compared outcome to retrospective controls (pre-BPP) and a national database [Quality Outcomes Database (QOD)/American Spine Registry (ASR)]. Results: Pre-BPP retrospective controls (n=1,010) were compared to patients enrolled in BPP (n=750). BPP reduced postoperative visits (POV) from 2,201 to 1,061 (52%). Total additional imaging studies computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) beyond standard X-ray were reduced from 192 studies to 57 (70%); 53% for lumbar fusion and 67% for cervical fusion. Comparing pre-BPP to BPP groups for complications, the number of adverse events was reduced by 52% overall; 45% for lumbar fusion, and 62% for cervical fusion. A subset of BPP patients (n=450) with available data were compared to a national registry QOD and ASR where lumbar and cervical fusion patients showed comparable less lengths of stay, lower 3-month complication rates and lower readmission rates. Conclusions: This is one of the first studies to standardize postoperative spine care as a first step towards creating uniformly accepted models for value-based care (VBC) in spine surgery.