Retrospective evaluation of traumatic pneumomediastinum in dogs and cats (2005-2022): 52 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence, etiology, clinical signs, diagnostics, treatments, and outcome of noniatrogenic traumatic pneumomediastinum (TPM) in dogs and cats. DESIGN: Retrospective study of cases (2005-2022). SETTING: University veterinary teaching hospital. ANIMALS: Fifty-two patients (29 dogs, 23 cats). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data collected from the medical records included signalment, physical examination findings, animal trauma triage (ATT) score, clinicopathological data, imaging data, surgical intervention, length of hospitalization, supportive care, complications, and outcome. Most dogs presented with tachycardia and tachypnea, while cats presented with hypothermia and tachypnea. Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, and dyspnea were the most common clinical signs for both species. The median calculated ATT score was 3.5 in dogs and 4 in cats. The most common radiographic abnormalities other than pneumomediastinum were pneumothorax and lung contusions. The overall mortality rate was 18%, with a significantly higher survival rate in dogs (26/28 dogs [93%], 15/22 cats (68%); P = 0.03). Outcome was unknown in 1 dog and 1 cat. The only significant difference in treatment between survivors and nonsurvivors was the requirement in dogs for positive pressure ventilation. The median hospitalization period was 2 days for both species, with a shorter hospitalization in the nonsurvivors (0.6 vs 2 days, respectively; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: TPM is an infrequent pathology in veterinary medicine and may be seen without an externally obvious injury. The most common causes for TPM in dogs were vehicular trauma and bite wounds, while high-rise syndrome was the most common cause in cats. Most of the cases have concurrent pneumothorax and require thoracocentesis; however, direct intervention to treat TPM is not usually required. The vast majority of cases did not undergo surgery to treat TPM. The prognosis for dogs with TPM was good but was guarded for cats.

Evaluation of outcome associated with feline trauma: A Veterinary Committee on Trauma registry study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcome (survival to discharge) among trauma types (blunt, penetrating, both) in cats. Secondary objectives were to evaluate for associations between trauma type, injury severity, and the diagnostics and interventions selected by primary clinicians. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of veterinary trauma registry data. SETTING: Veterinary Committee on Trauma (VetCOT) veterinary trauma centers (VTCs). ANIMALS: A total of 3895 feline trauma patients entered in the VetCOT trauma registry from April 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Data collected included patient demographics, trauma type, Abdominal Fluid Score (AFS), Animal Trauma Triage (ATT) score, surgical intervention, glide sign on Thoracic Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma, Triage, and Tracking (TFAST), pleural effusion on TFAST, modified Glasgow Coma Scale (mGCS), and outcome (survival to discharge). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data from 3895 cats were collected over a 30-month period. Incidence of trauma types was as follows: blunt, 58% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56%-59%); penetrating, 35% (95% CI: 34%-37%); and combination, 7.4% (95% CI: 6.7%-8.3%). Differences in survival incidence among the trauma types were identified: blunt, 80% (95% CI: 78%-81%); penetrating, 90% (95% CI: 89%-92%); and combined, 68% (95% CI: 63%-74%) (P < 0.01). Cats in the penetrating trauma group had the lowest proportion of severe injuries (6%) and highest proportion of mGCS of 18 (89%); cats with combined trauma had the highest proportion of severe injuries (26%) and lowest proportion of mGCS of 18 (63%). Point-of-care ultrasound and surgery were not performed in the majority of cases. When surgery was performed, the majority of blunt cases' procedures occurred in the operating room (79%), and the majority of penetrating cases' procedures were performed in the emergency room (81%). CONCLUSIONS: Cats suffering from penetrating trauma had the best outcome (survival), lower ATT scores, and higher mGCS overall. Cats that sustained a component of blunt trauma had a lower survival rate, higher ATT scores, and the highest proportion of mGCS <18.

Clinical parameters at time of admission as prognostic indicators in cats presented for trauma to an emergency centre in New Zealand: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to describe the clinical features of cats presented for trauma in a first-opinion and referral teaching hospital in New Zealand, and to determine the relationship between those features and outcome. METHODS: The electronic medical records of cats presented for trauma to the Massey University Pet Emergency Centre between September 2013 and January 2019 were examined, from which the signalment, clinical parameters and patient outcomes were extracted. Cases were assigned an Animal Trauma Triage (ATT) score and Modified Glasgow Coma Scale (MGCS) score. Variables were selected for inclusion in a logistic regression model to predict survival, and backward elimination was used to find the minimal significant model. RESULTS: In total, 530 cats met the inclusion criteria. The cause of injury was not known in the majority of cases (38.0%). The most common location of injury was the hindlimbs/pelvis/tail (n = 247; 41%), and skin lacerations/abrasions were the most common specific injury. Multivariate analysis revealed altered mentation (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, P = 0.029), hypothermia (rectal temperature <37.8°C [<100.04°F]; OR 0.45, P = 0.015) and an ATT score ⩾5 (OR 0.13, P <0.001) to be statistically significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Altered mentation and hypothermia are easily measurable perfusion parameter abnormalities associated with mortality in cats presenting with trauma. The ATT score appears to be an accurate prognostic indicator in cats presenting with trauma in New Zealand. These results highlight the importance of incorporating a hands-on triage examination in each cat that presents as an emergency after trauma.

Validation of the Calgary Spine Severity Score.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The Calgary Spine Severity Score (CSSS) is a published triage score reported in the Spine Journal in 2010. It separates spine referrals into four time categories of urgency. It stratifies patients according to clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings. The CSSS however still requires external validation at another institution and in an unselected sample of patients. PURPOSE: The aim was to validate the CSSS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a validation study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample included a total of 316 consecutive patients undergoing spinal surgery between April 2014 and September 2014 at a tertiary care hospital in Canada. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome was validity of the CSSS via its predicted time to operating room (OR) to predict actual time to OR. METHODS: We applied the CSSS to an unselected sample of consecutive patients from a tertiary care hospital between April 2014 and September 2014. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The CSSS was determined. We compared the time with OR predicted by the CSSS in one of four categories (routine>6 months=CSSS 3-5, priority<6 months=CSSS 6-8, urgent<1 month=CSSS 9-11, and emergent<1 week=CSSS 12-15) with the actual time to OR. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to assess the CSSS predictive ability. Cox proportional hazard models were built and compared via analysis of variance to determine whether the models differed in their ability to fit the data. RESULTS: Three hundred sixteen patients were eligible. Two hundred eighty-nine had sufficient data. One hundred eighteen were a mismatch with the actual time to OR yielding an accuracy of 63%. The CSSS overestimated the urgency in 68 cases and underestimated it in 50 cases. Notably, seven cauda equina syndrome cases were classified as priority (<6 months) instead of emergent. The concordance was 0.70 and the R-square 0.33. We proposed several adjustments to the CSSS to increase its accuracy. The modified CSSS had an accuracy of 96%, overestimating nine cases and underestimating one case. The concordance was 0.77, and the R-square 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: The modified CSSS is an easy-to-use triage score, which represents a substantial improvement as compared with the original CSSS. It now requires further external validation.