Adverse Event Assessment of Upadacitinib: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the FAERS Database.

PURPOSE: Upadacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, has been approved by the FDA to treat various autoimmune conditions. This study assessed its adverse events by analyzing reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: FAERS data from Q3 2019 to Q4 2023 were extracted, and disproportionality analyses were conducted using four statistical measures, reporting odds ratio, proportionate reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean. RESULTS: A total of 6 879 398 adverse event reports were collected, with 37 700 reports identifying upadacitinib as the "primary suspected." These reports involved 24 system organ classes and 246 preferred terms that met the criteria across all four algorithms. The distribution of adverse events was assessed separately for female and male patients. Further analysis of the top 25 preferred terms revealed that, although the system organ classes were similar between sexes, the specific adverse events differed. The adverse events were analyzed by gender, showing musculoskeletal and skin disorders were prevalent and severe in male patients, while musculoskeletal issues, infections, and abnormal laboratory tests were common in female patients. Unexpected events like trigger finger, biliary sepsis, and serious events such as oral neoplasm were also identified. CONCLUSION: This study provides real-world evidence for the safety evaluation of upadacitinib and underscores the need to monitor sex-specific adverse events. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm these pharmacovigilance findings.

Nonclinical evaluations of deucravacitinib and Janus kinase inhibitors in homeostatic and inflammatory pathways.

Translational medicine provides insight into novel drugs and predicts unwanted effects. In well-characterized pathways (e.g., cytokine-Janus kinase [JAK]-signal transducers and activators of transcription [STAT]), a variety of in vitro assessments were used to estimate selectivity of effects on different potential targets (i.e., JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2 [TYK2]). Several approved drugs were characterized as selective for the JAK family. These assessments are challenged by a lack of compounds that only inhibit one JAK family member. Deucravacitinib is a first-in-class, oral, selective, allosteric inhibitor of TYK2, a kinase required for IL-12, IL-23, and Type I interferon signaling. Unlike deucravacitinib, which selectively binds to the TYK2 regulatory domain, JAK1,2,3 inhibitors target the catalytic domain, contributing to nonselective targeting of JAK1,2,3. Cytokines associated with JAK1,2,3 signaling are required for both immune and nonimmune functions. A similar laboratory abnormality profile was observed in clinical trials using JAK1,2,3 inhibitors that has not been observed with deucravacitinib. In vitro testing of JAK1,2,3 inhibitors has relied upon assays of signal transduction, such as those measuring STAT phosphorylation, for estimates of potency and selectivity. These assay systems can be effective in estimating in vivo efficacy; however, they may not provide insight into downstream outcomes of receptor signaling, which may be more relevant for evaluating safety aspects. Assay systems assessing functional outcomes from cells may yield a more useful translational evaluation. Here, deucravacitinib was assessed for potency and selectivity versus three representatives of the JAK inhibitor class (tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib) based on functional assays. JAK inhibitors had suppressive activity against JAK2-dependent hematopoietic colony-forming assays modeling thrombopoiesis, erythropoiesis, and myelopoiesis; however, deucravacitinib did not. Deucravacitinib had limited potency against NK cells, cytotoxic T cells, T-helper cells, and regulatory T cells activated by JAK1/JAK3-dependent common gamma chain cytokines. These data are consistent with the biologic role of JAK1,2,3 and pharmacodynamic changes in clinical laboratory abnormalities. Against TYK2-dependent cytokines, deucravacitinib selectively inhibited Type I interferon stimulation of monocytes and dendritic cells and was a more potent inhibitor than JAK inhibitors. IL-12 and IL-23 functional outputs were similarly potently inhibited by deucravacitinib. Results are consistent with deucravacitinib selectively inhibiting TYK2.

Successful Treatment of Severe Pyoderma Gangrenosum and Ulcerative Colitis With Upadacitinib.

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare inflammatory and ulcerative skin disorder that is often associated with an underlying systemic disease, including inflammatory bowel disease. Many treatments used to treat inflammatory bowel disease are also used for the treatment of PG, including systemic therapies, immunomodulators, and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors; however, their efficacy in PG is limited. Novel treatments of PG are needed. We report the case of a 62-year-old woman with steroid-refractory PG and concomitant ulcerative colitis successfully treated for both conditions with upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase inhibitor.

Rapid Remission With Upadacitinib in a Child With Refractory Crohn's Disease and ATM Mutation: A Case Report.

Managing pediatric Crohn's disease (PCD) presents challenges due to severe complications and higher biologic therapy needs. Transitioning from anti-tumor necrosis factor agents to off-label therapies adds complexity. Although upadacitinib has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in adult inflammatory bowel disease and pediatric atopic dermatitis, there are limited data for its application in PCD. This case report delineates successful remission with upadacitinib in a child with CD refractory to infliximab, ustekinumab, adalimumab, thalidomide, and prednisone. Notably, the patient carried an ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene mutation. These findings provide valuable evidence for PCD management and highlight the potential benefits of upadacitinib in this population.

Upadacitinib to improve anxiety in patients with adalimumab-treated psoriatic arthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) often suffer from anxiety disorders. While upadacitinib has shown effectiveness in reducing various disease activity indicators in active PsA, its impact on anxiety disorders in PsA patients needs further investigation. METHODS: In this 12-week randomized, open-label, controlled trial, PsA patients with coexisting anxiety were randomly assigned to either the upadacitinib group or the adalimumab group in a 1:1 ratio. The upadacitinib group received a daily dose of 15 mg, while the adalimumab group received 40 mg every 2 weeks. The primary outcome measured the change in Hospital Anxiety Self-Assessment Scale (HADS-A) total scores after the 12-week intervention. Secondary outcomes included changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), the percentage of participants meeting the ACR20 criteria compared to baseline after 12 weeks, and the percentage of participants achieving a grade 0 or 1 in the psoriasis static Investigator's overall assessment (sPGA) at week 12 with an improvement of at least 2 points from baseline (sPGA 0/1). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means of normally distributed variables between the upadacitinib and adalimumab groups. DISCUSSION: The impact of upadacitinib on anxiety in PsA patients remains uncertain. This 12-week open randomized controlled trial aims to provide insights into disease progression and underscore the importance of addressing PsA-related anxiety during treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2400079755. Registered on January 11, 2024, with ChiCTR. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=216538.

Association between myeloid disorders and adult onset-inflammatory syndromes, successful treatment with JAK-inhibitors: Case series and literature review.

Approximately one-third of patients with myeloid disorders like myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) exhibit inflammatory and autoimmune disorders (IADs). These IADs often include atypical and incomplete forms of common autoimmune conditions, and exhibit resistance to conventional immunosuppressive therapies. There is growing interest in molecular relationships between IADs and MDS/CMML to find potential targeted therapies. Recently, patients with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene were identified as having VEXAS syndrome. Herein, we present a concise case-series illustrating concurrent elderly-onset inflammatory manifestations and myeloid disorders (MDS, CMML, and idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance). These patients manifested inflammatory or autoimmune symptoms, including erythema nodosum, Raynaud's phenomenon, Sjogren syndrome, and refractory pruritus, having onset after 60-years of age. The inflammatory manifestations were largely refractory to traditional immunosuppressive regimens. Remarkably, treatment with a JAK-1 inhibitor, upadacitinib, in two cases yielded marked resolution of inflammatory symptoms, facilitating the gradual tapering of corticosteroids, improvement of hemoglobin levels, and reduction in serum C-reactive protein levels. Upon loss of response to upadacitinib, JAK-2 inhibitor ruxolitinib provided clinical benefit in one of the cases, facilitating further tapering of glucocorticoids. This arena warrants further exploration through prospective studies of larger cohorts to delineate optimal management strategies.

Analysis of the shorter drug survival times for Janus kinase inhibitors and interleukin-17 inhibitors compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in a real-world cohort of axial spondyloarthritis patients - a retrospective analysis from the RHADAR network.

In recent years Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have joined tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) as approved disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) for moderate to severe forms of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Drug survival in axSpA patients has not been well studied in a real-world outpatient scenario since the approval of JAKi. We aimed to analyze the three drug classes based on modes of actions (MoA) for their persistence rates among German axSpA outpatients. A retrospective analysis of the RHADAR database for axSpA patients with a new initiation of TNFi, IL-17i, or JAKi treatment between January 2015 and October 2023 was conducted. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox regressions for drug discontinuation. 1222 new biological DMARD (TNFi [n = 954], IL-17i [n = 190]) or JAKi (n = 78) treatments were reported. The median drug survival was 31 months for TNFi, 25 for IL-17i, and 18 for JAKi. The corresponding 2-year drug survival rate was 79.6%, 72.6%, and 62.8% for TNFi, IL-17i, and JAKi, respectively. The probability for discontinuation for JAKi was significantly higher compared with TNFi (HR 1.91 [95% CI 1.22-2.99]) as well as for IL-17i compared with TNFi (HR 1.43 [95% CI 1.02-2.01]), possibly related to more frequent use of TNFis as first-line therapy. IL-17i and JAKi discontinuation probabilities were similar. Primary non-response was the reason for drug discontinuation in most cases across all MoA. TNFi treatment might persist longer than JAKi and IL-17i in German axSpA outpatients, possibly related to more severe or refractory disease in patients with JAKi-treated or IL-17i-treated axSpA.

How comparative studies can inform treatment decisions for Crohn's disease.

INTRODUCTION: As new therapies for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) are approved, there is an increasing need for evidence that clarifies their positioning and sequencing. AREAS COVERED: Comparative effectiveness research (CER) aims to inform physicians' decisions when they choose which intervention (drug or treatment strategy) to administer to their patients. Pragmatic head-to-head trials represent the best tools for CER, but only a few have been published in the IBD field. Network meta-analyses can point toward the superiority of one drug over another, but they do not reflect everyday clinical practice. Finally, real-world evidence complements that coming from head-to-head trials and network meta-analyses, assessing the real-life effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. EXPERT OPINION: There is insufficient evidence to create a definitive therapeutic algorithm for CD, but some general considerations can be made. Anti-TNF-α agents seemingly represent the most 'sustainable' first-line choice, considering benefit-harm ratio and costs; vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and risankizumab may be considered as first-line choice when safety issues become prominent. In the event of pharmacodynamic failure, out-of-class swap is to be preferred - possibly with anti-IL23p19 as the best option, with unclear data regarding upadacitinib positioning; a second anti-TNF-α could be considered, as a second choice, after pharmacokinetic failure.

A Real-World Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Upadacitinib, Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors, and Other Advanced Therapies After Switching from an Initial Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the clinical effectiveness of switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) to upadacitinib (TNFi-UPA), another TNFi (TNFi-TNFi), or an advanced therapy with another mechanism of action (TNFi-other MOA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi RA Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey administered to rheumatologists and their consulting patients in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the UK, Japan, Canada, and the USA from May 2021 to January 2022. Patients who switched treatment from an initial TNFi were stratified by subsequent therapy of interest: TNFi-UPA, TNFi-TNFi, or TNFi-other MOA. Physician-reported clinical outcomes including disease activity (with formal DAS28 scoring available for 29% of patients) categorized as remission, low/moderate/high disease activity, as well as pain were recorded at initiation of current treatment and ≥ 6 months from treatment switch. Fatigue and treatment adherence were measured ≥ 6 months from treatment switch. Inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment compared outcomes by subsequent class of therapy: TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-TNFi, or TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-other MOA. RESULTS: Of 503 patients who switched from their first TNFi, 261 were in TNFi-UPA, 128 in TNFi-TNFi, and 114 in TNFi-other MOA groups. At the time of switch, most patients had moderate/high disease activity (TNFi-UPA: 73%; TNFi-TNFi: 52%; TNFi-other MOA: 60%). After adjustment for differences in characteristics at point of switch, patients in TNFi-UPA group (n = 261) were significantly more likely to achieve physician-reported remission (67.7% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.0015), no pain (55.7% vs. 25.4%; p = 0.0007), and complete adherence (60.0% vs. 34.2%; p = 0.0049) compared with patients in TNFi-TNFi group (n = 121). Similar findings were observed for TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-other MOA groups (n = 111). CONCLUSION: Patients who switched from TNFi to UPA had significantly better clinical outcomes of remission, no pain, and complete adherence than those who cycled TNFi or switched to another MOA.

Novel Pharmaceuticals and Therapeutics for Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha-Resistant Crohn's Disease: A Narrative Review.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a medical condition that causes persistent, relapsing inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. It is an umbrella term encompassing two different conditions: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). The standard treatment for patients with moderate to severe CD is tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors; however, a subset of CD patients face challenges in regard to this disease's treatment. Certain populations of patients with CD may exhibit resistance or develop tolerance to TNF-α inhibitor therapy over time. The recurrent gastrointestinal inflammation associated with CD can severely impact the quality of life and lead to complications for those suffering from this condition. The symptomatic flare-ups these subpopulations continue to experience underscores why such a need for alternative therapies is desperately needed. These alternative therapies not only offer potential benefits for those with TNF-α resistance, but CD may also serve as a superior therapy option for those trying to avoid the adverse effects of CD treatments available today. This review aims to explore and investigate the novel drugs and therapies that are being investigated for the treatment of TNF-α resistant CD, such as upadacitinib, risankizumab, vedolizumab, synbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and stem cell therapy. Upadacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor, Risankizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23, and Vedolizumab is an integrin receptor antagonist. The latest advancements in CD management have shown encouraging results. Some of these novel drugs and therapies not only offer a potential solution for CD patients exhibiting resistance to TNF-α inhibitors but may also provide a superior alternative for individuals prone to opportunistic infections.

Upadacitinib for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) remains a clinical challenge associated with considerable morbidity, including colectomy. Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor, is approved for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis in patients intolerant or not responding to tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors. It has also increasingly been used off-label for ASUC. We performed a systematic review of all available literature on UPA in ASUC. We identified 11 studies, with a pooled total of 55 patients. Most patients experienced rapid and sustained improvement. Colectomy rate at 90 days was 16.3%. Among those who did not get colectomy, 80% were in steroid-free remission at follow-up. The reported adverse events were low, including 2 venous thromboembolic events. Overall, UPA appears to represent a safe and effective therapy for ASUC.

This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in treating acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Results indicate that upadacitinib is a promising option for ASUC patients, with a low colectomy rate and high rates of steroid-free clinical remission.

A case of refractory anti-MDA5-positive amyopathic dermatomyositis successfully treated with upadacitinib.

Purpose: Amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM) is a rare, idiopathic, connective tissue disease and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive ADM is more treatment-resistant, especially in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The purpose of this article is to report a case of anti-MDA5-positive ADM successfully treated with JAK inhibitor Upadacitinib.Materials and methods: A 35-year-old Chinese woman presented with recurrent itchy erythema on her face and scalp for 4 years. Upon examination, there were heliotrope erythema and eyelid edema, reddish rash on neck and scalp. Biopsy of the lesions was consistent with DM and a line blot assay confirmed the presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies. This patient was treated with oral Upadacitinib at a dosage of 30 mg daily.Results: After 6 weeks of treatment, she achieved complete clinical remission with no reported side effects or instances of relapse. The antibody titer of anti-MDA5 was also decreased.Conclusions: Upadacitinib may be a potential drug candidate in patients with treatment-resistant ADM, especially in cases with refractory cutaneous conditions.

Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Biologic DMARDs: Results Through Week 216 from the SELECT-CHOICE Study.

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg (UPA15) through week 216 was evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 3 SELECT-CHOICE study. METHODS: Patients with RA refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were randomized to UPA15 or abatacept (ABA) for 24 weeks. During the open-label LTE, patients on ABA switched to UPA15 at week 24, and those on UPA15 continued treatment. The safety and efficacy of continuous UPA15, and ABA to UPA15, are summarized through week 216. RESULTS: The LTE was comprised of 91.4% (n = 277/303) of patients that initially received UPA15, and 89.6% (n = 277/309) that initially received ABA. Of patients on UPA15 in the LTE (n = 547), 28.3% (n = 155/547) discontinued the study drug by week 216. Relative to other adverse events of special interest, and largely consistent with previous findings at week 24, higher rates of serious infection, COVID-19, herpes zoster, and elevated creatine phosphokinase were reported, while rates of malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) were low. Long-term safety data with UPA through week 216 aligned with previous observations and no new safety risks were identified, including in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15. Proportions of patients achieving 28-joint disease activity score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) < 2.6/ ≤ 3.2, clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and simple disease activity index (SDAI) low disease activity/remission, ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20/50/70) response criteria, and Boolean remission were maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), patient's assessment of pain, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) were also maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Across all efficacy endpoints, similar results were observed in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15 versus continuous UPA15. Patients with an inadequate response to ≥ 1 prior tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (UPA15: n = 263/303, 86.8%; ABA to UPA15: n = 273/309, 88.3%) showed similar responses to the total population. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term safety profile of UPA was consistent with previous findings and the broader RA clinical program. Compared to the primary analyses at week 24, efficacy responses were maintained or further improved with UPA15 through week 216 in patients with RA. Trial registration, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03086343.

A long-term study looked at a drug named upadacitinib to treat people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a disease that causes joint pain and damage. The study included patients whose RA was not improved by other injectable medicines. The study compared upadacitinib with another drug called abatacept. After 24 weeks, patients who were taking abatacept switched to upadacitinib, and patients taking upadacitinib continued on upadacitinib treatment for over 4 years. The researchers looked at how well the treatments worked over the long-term and if there were any side effects. The side effects with upadacitinib treatment in this long-term study were similar to side effects reported in previous studies with upadacitinib. The researchers also found that upadacitinib helped to lessen the symptoms of RA over time and helped patients complete their daily activities and reduced their pain and tiredness. This was true for patients who switched from abatacept to upadacitinib after 24 weeks and for patients who took upadacitinib from the start of the study. Patients who had not responded to other medicines also had similar improvements with upadacitinib. In conclusion, upadacitinib can help people with RA over the long term and no new safety risks were found.

Treatment of rosacea with upadacitinib and abrocitinib: case report and review of evidence for Janus kinase inhibition in rosacea.

Introduction: Conventional rosacea treatments are not uniformly pervasive, and the adverse reactions can potentially constrain their utility. The clinical use of JAK1 inhibitors upadacitinib and abrocitinib in the treatment of refractory rosacea has rarely been explored. Case report: We presented two cases of patients who received the JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib and four cases of patients who received the JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib for the treatment of refractory rosacea. Discussion: The JAK1 inhibitors upadacitinib and abrocitinib may be promising medical options for patients with refractory rosacea. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib and abrocitinib require prospective controlled studies to assess them more comprehensively.

Upadacitinib monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: efficacy and safety through 5 years in the SELECT-EARLY randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib monotherapy versus methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy over 5 years among MTX-naïve patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 3 SELECT-EARLY trial. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg or MTX. Patients who did not achieve CDAI remission and had < 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts at week 26 received rescue therapy (addition of MTX in the upadacitinib group and addition of upadacitinib in the MTX group). Efficacy assessments were evaluated over 5 years and are reported as observed (AO) for patients who received continuous monotherapy with upadacitinib 15/30 mg or MTX and by randomized group applying non-responder imputation (NRI). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) per 100 patient-years were summarized over 5 years. RESULTS: Of 945 patients randomized and treated, 775 (82%) completed week 48 and entered the LTE on study drug. Higher proportions of patients consistently achieved disease activity targets over 5 years with upadacitinib than MTX. In AO analyses, 53%/59% of patients attained CDAI remission with upadacitinib 15/30 mg versus 43% with MTX at week 260. NRI analyses showed better CDAI, DAS28(CRP), and ACR responses with upadacitinib relative to MTX at week 260 (all comparisons, nominal P < .001). Upadacitinib treatment also resulted in numerically greater inhibition of structural joint progression through week 260 compared to MTX. Most TEAEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were numerically higher in patients receiving upadacitinib 30 mg. Rates of serious infections, herpes zoster, creatine phosphokinase elevation, nonmelanoma skin cancer, and neutropenia were numerically higher with upadacitinib than MTX. The observed safety profile of upadacitinib over 5 years was consistent with earlier trial results and integrated phase 3 safety analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib showed better clinical responses versus MTX in patients with RA throughout the 5-year trial. Higher rates of several AEs were observed with upadacitinib, especially in the 30 mg group, compared to MTX. When used as monotherapy in MTX-naïve patients, the approved upadacitinib 15 mg dose showed better long-term efficacy versus MTX and an overall favorable benefit-risk profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02706873.

Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adults with extensive non-segmental vitiligo: a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study.

Background: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition is a promising approach for treating vitiligo. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, an oral selective JAK inhibitor, in adults with non-segmental vitiligo. Methods: This was a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study completed at 33 clinical centres in the United States, Canada, France, and Japan. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with non-segmental vitiligo and had a Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) ≥0.5 and a Total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI) ≥5. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:2:1:1) using an interactive response technology to receive upadacitinib 6 mg (UPA6), upadacitinib 11 mg (UPA11), upadacitinib 22 mg (UPA22), or placebo (PBO; preassigned to switch to either UPA11 or UPA22 in period 2) once daily for 24 weeks (period 1). For weeks 24-52 (period 2), patients randomly assigned to upadacitinib continued their treatment, and patients receiving PBO switched to their preassigned upadacitinib dose in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in F-VASI at week 24. Efficacy was analysed in the intention-to-treat population, and safety was examined in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04927975. Findings: Between June 16, 2021, and June 27, 2022, 185 patients (including 115 [62%] who were female and 70 [38%] who were male) were randomly assigned to UPA6 (n = 49), UPA11 (n = 47), UPA22 (n = 43), or PBO (n = 46). At week 24, the LS mean difference versus PBO in the percent change from baseline in F-VASI was -7.60 (95% CI -22.18 to 6.97; p = 0.3037) for UPA6, -21.27 (95% CI -36.02 to -6.52; p = 0.0051) for UPA11, and -19.60 (95% CI -35.04 to -4.16; p = 0.0132) for UPA22. The LS mean difference versus PBO in the percent change from baseline in T-VASI was -7.45 (95% CI -16.86 to 1.96; p = 0.1198) for UPA6, -10.84 (95% CI -20.37 to -1.32; p = 0.0259) for UPA11 and -14.27 (95% CI -24.24 to -4.30; p = 0.0053) for UPA22. Ongoing treatment with upadacitinib induced continuous skin repigmentation over time without reaching a plateau through week 52. The rates for study drug discontinuation and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were higher in the UPA22 group than in the UPA11 and UPA6 groups. Eight serious TEAEs, including one death of unknown cause and one case of infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma, were reported through 52 weeks; only two serious TEAEs (coronary artery arteriosclerosis [UPA6 (n = 1)] and non-fatal ischemic stroke [UPA11 (n = 1)]) were deemed by the investigator to have a reasonable possibility of being related to study drug. The one case of breast cancer in the UPA11 group was deemed unrelated to study drug, and the one death of unknown cause in the UPA22 group was reviewed and adjudicated and was deemed to be unrelated to study drug. The most common TEAEs were COVID-19, headache, acne, and fatigue. No new safety signals were observed. Interpretation: Upadacitinib monotherapy led to substantial repigmentation of both facial and total body vitiligo lesions and may offer an effective treatment option for adults with extensive non-segmental vitiligo. Based on these findings, upadacitinib 15 mg is being investigated in adults and adolescents with non-segmental vitiligo in an ongoing phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Funding: AbbVie Inc.

Drug survival superiority of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and interleukin-17 inhibitors over Janus kinase inhibitors and interleukin-12/23 inhibitors in German psoriatic arthritis outpatients: retrospective analysis of the RHADAR database.

Objective: Treatment options with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have evolved over recent years. In addition to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), four classes of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs; interleukin [IL]-23 inhibitors [IL-23i], IL-12/23 inhibitors [IL-12/23i], tumor necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi], and IL-17 inhibitors [IL-17i]) are currently approved for moderate to severe PsA treatment. There is minimal evidence of the persistence of these drugs among PsA outpatients in a real-world scenario during the period following the approval of JAKi. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the drug survival rates of biologic and JAKi therapies among German PsA outpatients during routine clinical care. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed PsA patients with a new prescription for a biologic or JAKi in the RHADAR database between January 2015 and October 2023. Kaplan-Meier Curves and Cox regression modelling were used to compare drug survival rates. Results: 1352 new prescriptions with bDMARDs (IL-12/23i [n=50], IL-23i [n=31], TNFi [n=774], IL-17i [n=360]) or JAKi (n=137) were identified. The 5-year drug survival rate was 67.8% for IL-17i, 62.3% for TNFi, 53.3% for JAKi, and 46.0% for IL-12/23i. Discontinuation probabilities for JAKi and IL-12/23i were significantly higher compared with TNFi (JAKi hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, [95% CI 1.23-2.24], p=0.001; IL-12/23i HR 1.54, [95% CI 1.02-2.33], p=0.042) and IL-17i (JAKi HR 1.77, [95% CI 1.27-2.47], p=0.001; IL-12/23i HR 1.64, [95% CI 1.06-2.55], p=0.027). JAKi-treated patients had more severe disease and more osteoarthritis (OA) compared to TNFi and more OA compared to IL-17i. Conclusion: German PsA outpatients might persist longer with TNFi and IL-17i compared with IL-12/23i or JAKi. For TNFi, differences in subgroup characteristics and comorbidities (OA) may have affected drug survival rates. For IL-17i, the longer drug survival might not only be related to less OA compared to JAKi and, therefore, might be affected by other factors.