Evaluation of the Adherence to Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Recommendations and Associated Factors in a University Hospital: a Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is an important preventive measure, aiming to minimize surgical site infections. However, despite evidence-based guidelines, adherence to SAP protocols remains suboptimal in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the adequacy of SAP in a high-complexity hospital and investigate associated factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was conducted, involving surgeries performed by expert teams in cardiology, urology, neurology, and gastrointestinal. SAP prescriptions were evaluated based on indication, antibiotic choice, dosage, and duration, according to the hospital protocol. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and association tests between protocol adherence and patient demographics, clinical variables, surgical teams, and types of surgeries. RESULTS: Out of 1,864 surgeries, only 20.7% adhered to SAP protocols. Lower adherence rates were observed for antibiotic choice and duration of prophylaxis. Neurological surgeries exhibited significantly lower adherence, particularly concerning antibiotic choice and duration. Factors associated with non-adherence included elevated preoperative blood glucose levels, prolonged hospitalization, and extended surgical duration. Logistic regression analysis identified surgical teams as significant factors influencing protocol adherence. CONCLUSION: Despite the relatively high adherence to antibiotic dosage, challenges persist in antibiotic choice and duration adjustment. Poor glycemic control, prolonged surgery and surgical teams were variables associated with innapropriate practice.

Real-world evidence in the use of Bevacizumab in age-related macular degeneration (ArMD): a scoping review.

PURPOSE: Pharmacological treatments for age-related macular degeneration (ArMD) include anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies. Bevacizumab is used off-label, as it has no indication for ArMD. This study aims to identify and describe literature on real-world evidence of bevacizumab (originator or biosimilars) use in ArMD. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in Medline, CINAHL and Embase databases. Studies published in English after September 2017, conducted in USA, including adults (≥ 18 years old) with ArMD who received treatment with bevacizumab for ArMD were included. The review was further limited to peer-reviewed observational studies that quantitatively analyze either clinical or patient-reported outcomes among patients treated with bevacizumab for ArMD. RESULTS: The search strategy retrieved 543 studies. After title and abstract screening, a total of 142 studies were selected for full-text review leading to a total of 12 studies qualifying for data charting. All were retrospective studies. Five (41.6%) of the studies had less than 500 eyes included in the analysis, and the rest had over a thousand eyes. All except one study reported clinical outcomes (visual acuity was the main outcome in 8 (66.6%) studies). There were 3 (25%) studies reporting adverse events of bevacizumab intravitreal injections. None of the studies specified using biosimilars for bevacizumab and none mentioned patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: The lack of studies aiming to study the patient-reported outcomes as well as the use of biosimilars of bevacizumab in ArMD makes this field a potential for future research. The different exposures and times to follow-up make it difficult to compare results among the selected studies.

Mitigating the Risk of Drug Interactions in Cancer Patients Taking Oral Anticancer Agents: The Role of a Multidisciplinary Team-Based Medication Reconciliation.

PURPOSE: Polypharmacy in cancer patients is a recognized issue and should be an integral part of comprehensive patient assessment and management. Despite this, a systematic review of concomitant drugs or a search for potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is not always performed. Here, we present the results of a medication reconciliation model performed by a multidisciplinary team to identify clinically meaningful potential DDIs (defined by the presence of DDI of major severity or contraindication) in cancer patients undergoing oral antineoplastic drugs. METHODS: From June to December 2022, we performed a non-interventional, prospective, cross-sectional, single-center study of adult cancer patients, initiating or undergoing treatment with oral antineoplastic drugs, referred by their oncologists for therapeutic review regarding potential DDIs. DDIs were assessed by a multidisciplinary team of hospital pharmacists and medical oncologists, through research in three different drug databases as well as in the summary of product characteristics. A report detailing all potential DDIs was created for each request and provided to the patient's medical oncologist for further examination. RESULTS: Overall, 142 patients' medications were reviewed. Regardless of the severity or clinical importance, 70.4% of patients had at least one potential DDI. We found 184 combinations of oral anticancer and regular therapy agents with potential DDIs, 55 of whom were considered of major severity by at least one DDI database. As expected, the number of potential DDIs increased with the number of active substances in regular therapy (p < 0.001), but we did not find an increased relation between age and the total number of potential DDIs (p = 0.109). Thirty-nine (27.5%) patients had at least one clinically meaningful DDI identified. After adjustment through multivariable logistic regression, only the female sex (odds ratio (OR) 3.01, p = 0.029), the number of active comorbidities (OR 0.60, p = 0.029), and the presence of proton pump inhibitors in chronic medication (OR 2.99, p = 0.033) remained as predictors of potential meaningful DDI. CONCLUSION: Although drug interactions are a concern in oncology, a systematic DDI review is rarely conducted in medical oncology consultations. The availability of a medication reconciliation service, carried out by a multidisciplinary team with dedicated time for this task, is an added value for safety enhancement in cancer patients.

Epidemiology and healthcare resource utilization in atopic dermatitis in Colombia: A retrospective analysis of data from the National Health Registry from 2015 to 2020 / Epidemiología y uso de recursos de salud en dermatitis atópica en Colombia: análisis retrospectivo de datos del Registro Nacional de Salud de 2015 a 2020

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis, also known as eczema or atopic eczema, is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by the presence of pruritus accompanied by itching. In Colombia, epidemiological and healthcare resource utilization information regarding this pathology is limited. Objective: To describe atopic dermatitis epidemiological characteristics and healthcare resource utilization patterns in Colombia. Materials and methods: A retrospective database study using real-world data obtained from the national claims database SISPRO (Sistema de Información para la Protección Social) for the 2015-2020 period was carried out. Sociodemographic (age, and health services delivery), epidemiological (incidence, prevalence, and comorbidities), and healthcare resource utilization data were extracted from the SISPRO database. Results: The epidemiological results showed increased incidence and prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Colombia in the 2018-2019 period compared to 2015-2017. Accordingly, the number of medical consultations (particularly with specialists), the number of procedures, and the number of hospitalizations of patients with atopic dermatitis increased. Topic and systemic corticoids were the most frequently prescribed drugs. Conclusions: Diagnoses of atopic dermatitis in Colombia increased with a concomitant increase in healthcare resource utilization during 2015-2020, which was possibly slowed down by the arrival of the Covid-19. This study may help physicians gaining a better understanding of the disease, improving atopic dermatitis patient management.

Introducción. La dermatitis atópica, también conocida como eczema o eczema atópico, es un trastorno inflamatorio crónico de la piel caracterizado por la presencia de prurito acompañado de picor. En Colombia, la información epidemiológica y de utilización de recursos sanitarios sobre esta enfermedad es limitada. Objetivo. Describir las características epidemiológicas y los patrones de utilización de recursos sanitarios para la dermatitis atópica en Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Se trata de un estudio retrospectivo en el cual se utilizan datos de la práctica clínica real obtenidos del registro nacional SISPRO (Sistema de Información para la Protección Social) en el período 2015-2020. Se extrajeron datos sociodemográficos (incluida la edad y la prestación de servicios de salud), epidemiológicos (incluidos la incidencia, la prevalencia y las comorbilidades) y los correspondientes a la utilización de los recursos sanitarios. Resultados. Los resultados epidemiológicos han demostrado un aumento de la incidencia y prevalencia de la dermatitis atópica en Colombia en el periodo 20182019, en comparación con el periodo 2015-2017. Aumentó el número de consultas médicas (particularmente, con especialistas) de pacientes con dermatitis atópica, el de procedimientos y el de hospitalizaciones. Los corticoides tópicos y sistémicos fueron los medicamentos más prescritos. Conclusiones. Los diagnósticos de dermatitis atópica en Colombia aumentaron con un incremento concomitante en la utilización de recursos sanitarios durante 2015-2020, que posiblemente se vio atenuado por la llegada del Covid-19. Este estudio puede ayudar a los médicos a tener un mejor conocimiento de la enfermedad y, por lo tanto, mejorar el tratamiento de los pacientes con dermatitis atópica.

Evaluation of a multifaceted medication review in older patients in the outpatient setting: a before-and-after study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of medication-related emergency department visits and acute hospital admissions in older patients is rising due to the ageing of the population and increasing prevalence of multimorbidity and associated polypharmacy. AIM: To explore whether a combined medication review performed in the outpatient setting reduces the number of medication-related emergency department visits and hospital (re)admissions. METHOD: All consecutive patients visiting the geriatric outpatient clinic underwent a multifaceted medication review (i.e. evaluation by at least a geriatrician, and/or pharmacist and use of clinical decision support system). Subsequently, we analysed the number of, and reason for, emergency department visits, acute hospital admissions and readmissions in the year prior to and the year following the index-date (date of first presentation and medication review). RESULTS: A multifaceted medication review reduced the number of potentially medication-related emergency department visits (38.9% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.01), although the total number of ED visits or acute hospital admissions per patient in the year before and after medication review did not differ. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted medication review performed in the outpatient clinic reduced the number of potentially medication-related emergency department visits and could therefore reduce negative health outcomes and healthcare costs.

Japanese Nationwide Comparative Survey of Medication Guidance Provided by Certified and Uncertified Palliative Care Pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: As members of a medical team, pharmacists are expected to provide optimal patient-centered, evidence-based pharmacotherapy. In Japan, in consideration of the importance of palliative care, a system was initiated for certifying palliative care pharmacists in 2010. However, no studies have evaluated the usefulness of board certification in palliative pharmacy. Therefore, we surveyed the status of medication guidance for the physical and psychological symptoms of patients receiving palliative care and compared the medication guidance provided by certified and uncertified pharmacists. METHODS: The survey was conducted in February and March 2022. Pharmacists registered as members of the Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Palliative Care and Sciences were surveyed by using a web-based questionnaire and 209 pharmacists responded: the certified pharmacist group comprised 123 (58.9%) pharmacists and the uncertified pharmacist group comprised 86 (41.1%) pharmacists. RESULTS: The certified pharmacist group provided better and more frequent medication guidance, according to responses to four of the six items related to pain relief. Three items were related to non-pain symptom relief, and one of the four items was related to psychiatric symptom relief (P < 0.05). The study showed that the certified pharmacist group received a better rating than the uncertified pharmacist group for involvement in palliative pharmacotherapy leading to improvement of patient quality of life (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: As compared with uncertified pharmacists, certified pharmacists intervened more proactively and provided a broader range of palliative care.

Patterns of azithromycin use in obstructive airway diseases: a real-world observational study.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose long-term azithromycin is recommended in clinical practice guidelines for obstructive airway diseases (OAD); however, an optimal therapeutic regimen is not yet established. AIM: To understand the patterns of azithromycin use in OAD, characterise the patients who received it and evaluate its safety and efficacy using real-world data. METHODS: We audited 91 patients who had received azithromycin for at least 4 weeks for the management of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. RESULTS: The mean age was 65 ± 18 years, 60% were female and 48% were ex-smokers. The majority had asthma (75%), either alone (50%) or in combination with COPD (12%) or bronchiectasis (13%). Most (64%) reported cough or sputum at baseline. The most common treatment regimen was azithromycin 250 mg daily (73%) for more than 1 year (57%), with only seven adverse events. There was a significant reduction in the proportions of patients requiring emergency department visits (48% vs 32%; P < 0.001) and hospital admissions (35% vs 31%; P < 0.001) after starting azithromycin. In 88% of cases, physicians favoured the use of azithromycin. CONCLUSION: Physicians are currently using low-dose azithromycin for a long duration of more than 1 year for the management of OAD. The typical case definition is an older non-smoking adult with persistent asthma, often in combination with another OAD and presenting with bothersome cough or sputum. Azithromycin was well tolerated and led to reduced healthcare utilisation. Further research is required to establish an optimal dosage regimen of azithromycin in OAD.

Emergency Department Utilization of Adult Cancer Patient in Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study, 2017-2019.

PURPOSE: The current study aimed to identify the overall characteristics of cancer-related emergency department (ED) visits by adult in Korea, including analyses of factors associated with ED stay time and outcomes nationwide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected data on cancer-related ED visits from the National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) database between 2017 and 2019. RESULTS: ED visits by cancer patients comprised 5.5% (667,935 visits) of total ED visits from 2017 to 2019, which was slightly higher than in other counties. Patients with cancer who visited the ED were over 50 years old, the majority being males, and patients with cancer visited EDs in certified tertiary hospitals more frequently than patients without cancer. In multivariate analyses, the adjusted odds ratio for a length of stay more than 8 hours in the ED of certified tertiary hospitals was 126.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.422 to 1.460) when compared to hospitals. Nevertheless, the longer the patients stayed in the ED, the more likely they were to be admitted. CONCLUSION: The longer ED stay and higher proportion of cancer patient hospitalizations suggest that cancer patients visit ED to be admitted as well as to receive acute care. The frequency of ED visits and admission may be adjusted to some extent depending on outpatient education, such as self-management of symptoms and situations. Improving cancer care in local communities should be met though provisions such as linking treatment between hospitals or supplying appropriate medical personnel, even for the efficient use of ED resources in hospitals.

Regulatory reliance pathways during health emergencies: enabling timely authorizations for COVID-19 vaccines in Latin America / Mecanismos de utilización de las decisiones de autoridades regulatorias de otras jurisdicciones en las emergencias de salud: autorización oportuna de las vacunas contra la COVID-19 en América Latina / Uso de decisões regulatórias de outras autoridades durante emergências sanitárias e a tempestividade da autorização de vacinas contra a COVID-19 na América Latina

ABSTRACT Objectives. To map the timing and nature of regulatory reliance pathways used to authorize COVID-19 vaccines in Latin America. Methods. An observational study was conducted assessing the characteristics of all COVID-19 vaccine authorizations in Latin America. For every authorization it was determined whether reliance was used in the authorization process. Subgroups of reference national regulatory authorities (NRAs) and non-reference NRAs were compared. Results. 56 authorizations of 10 different COVID-19 vaccines were identified in 18 countries, of which 25 (44.6%) used reliance and 12 (21.4%) did not. For the remaining 19 (33.0%) it was not possible to determine whether reliance was used. Reference agencies used reliance less often (40% of authorizations with a known pathway) compared to non-reference agencies (100%). The median review time was just 15 days and does not meaningfully differ between reliance and non-reliance authorizations. Conclusions. This study demonstrated that for these vaccines, despite reliance pathways being associated with numerous rapid authorizations, independent authorization review times were not considerably longer than reliance reviews; reliance pathways were not a prerequisite for rapid authorization. Nevertheless, reliance pathways provided rapid authorizations in response to the COVID-19 emergency.

RESUMEN Objetivos. Determinar dónde y cuándo se usaron las decisiones de autoridades regulatorias de otras jurisdicciones y la naturaleza de estos mecanismos para autorizar vacunas contra la COVID-19 en América Latina. Métodos. Se realizó un estudio observacional para evaluar las características de todas las autorizaciones de vacunas contra la COVID-19 en América Latina. Para cada autorización se determinó si se emplearon las decisiones de autoridades regulatorias de otras jurisdicciones en el proceso de autorización. Se compararon subgrupos de autoridades regulatorias nacionales (ARN) consideradas de referencia con otras ARN no usadas como referencia. Resultados. Se determinó dónde se otorgaron 56 autorizaciones de 10 vacunas diferentes contra la COVID-19 en 18 países; de estas 56 autorizaciones, 25 (44,6%) hicieron uso de las decisiones de autoridades regulatorias de otras jurisdicciones y 12 (21,4%), no. Para las 19 restantes (33,0%) no fue posible determinar si se hizo uso de las decisiones de autoridades regulatorias de otras jurisdicciones. Los organismos de referencia utilizaron las decisiones de autoridades regulatorias de otras jurisdicciones con menos frecuencia (40% de las autorizaciones con un mecanismo conocido) en comparación con los organismos no usados como referencia (100%). El plazo medio de revisión fue de tan solo 15 días y no difiere significativamente entre las autorizaciones que emplearon decisiones de autoridades regulatorias de otras jurisdicciones y las que no las emplearon. Conclusiones. En este estudio se demostró que, a pesar de que los mecanismos de utilización de las decisiones de autoridades regulatorias de otras jurisdicciones se asocian en muchos casos con autorizaciones rápidas, para estas vacunas los plazos de revisión independiente para la autorización no fueron considerablemente mayores que los de las revisiones que emplearon decisiones de autoridades regulatorias de otras jurisdicciones. También se demostró que para obtener una autorización rápida no se requería la utilización de las decisiones de autoridades regulatorias de otras jurisdicciones. Sin embargo, estos mecanismos proporcionaron autorizaciones rápidas en respuesta a la emergencia por la COVID-19.

RESUMO Objetivos. Mapear a tempestividade e a natureza do uso de decisões regulatórias de outras autoridades (reliance regulatório) para autorização de vacinas contra a COVID-19 na América Latina. Métodos. Em um estudo observacional, foram avaliadas as características de todas as autorizações de vacinas contra COVID-19 na América Latina. Para cada autorização, foi determinado se foram utilizadas decisões de outras autoridades regulatórias para embasar o processo de autorização. Foram comparados subgrupos de autoridades reguladoras nacionais (ARN) de referência (ARNr) e ARN não consideradas de referência. Resultados. Foram identificadas 56 autorizações de 10 vacinas diferentes contra a COVID-19 em 18 países, das quais 25 (44,6%) utilizaram decisões de outras ARN como base para o registro e 12 (21,4%) não. Para as 19 (33,0%) autorizações restantes, não foi possível determinar se decisões de outras ARN foram utilizadas. As ARNr utilizaram decisões de outras autoridades com menos frequência (40% das autorizações com via regulatória conhecida) em comparação com as ARN não consideradas de referência (100%). A mediana do tempo de tramitação foi de apenas 15 dias, sem diferença significativa entre processos nos quais foram utilizadas decisões de outras agências e processos que não as utilizaram. Conclusões. Este estudo demonstrou que, para estas vacinas, apesar de o uso do reliance regulatório estar associado a várias autorizações rápidas, os tempos de tramitação não foram consideravelmente maiores em autorizações independentes do que quando foram utilizadas decisões de outras ARN; o reliance regulatório não foi um pré-requisito para autorização rápida. No entanto, o uso de tais processos viabilizou autorizações rápidas em resposta à emergência de COVID-19.

Data on the utilization of paraneoplastic syndrome autoantibody testing at an academic medical center.

Paraneoplastic syndromes are rare conditions associated with characteristic autoantibodies produced by malignancy, although similar autoantibodies and clinical presentations may occur in the absence of any neoplasm. Testing for paraneoplastic syndromes often involves panels of autoantibody assays. While autoantibody testing may reveal or confirm actionable clinical diagnoses, inappropriate utilization of testing may be low yield and further lead to false positives that may confuse the clinical picture. There is thus opportunity to improve patient care by analyzing patterns of paraneoplastic autoantibody test utilization. The data in this article provides results from detailed retrospective review of patients tested by 7 autoantibody tests or test panels offered by two large reference laboratories in the United States. The data include 1,446 tests performed on 1,338 unique patients at an academic medical center. For all results, detailed chart review revealed main category of presenting symptoms, patient location at time of testing (either inpatient or outpatient), sex, age, whether cancer was present at the time of testing or later detected, and the specific results of the testing. The data are summarized by category of testing and specific autoantibodies.

Impact of a Pharmaceutical Care Program at Discharge on Patients at High Risk of Readmission According to the Hospital Score.

Background: A significant percentage of hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge are a result of avoidable drug-related problems. Stratifying patients according to readmission risk is key to pharmaceutical intervention (PI) design strategies to improve treatment outcomes. Objective: To assess whether a pharmaceutical care (PC) program at discharge in polymedicated patients at high potentially avoidable readmission (PAR) risk, according to the HOSPITAL score, improves 30-day readmission rate (30-dRR). Methods: This prospective controlled, quasi-experimental, 11-month study included 163 chronic polymedicated patients (>5 medications) at high PAR risk according to the HOSPITAL score. We calculated the 30-dRR and number of medication variations and Medication Regimen Complexity Index-E (MRCI-E) after PI. Results were compared with a retrospective cohort of chronic patients at high PAR risk. Results: The 30-dRR was 18.4% in the intervention group and 25.6% in the control group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.14). Total medication reduction (-1.28; 95% CI = -1.88 to -0.68), number of high-risk medications in chronic patients (-0.58; 95% CI = -0.9 to -0.26), and MRCI-E (-6.42; 95% CI = -8.07 to -4.76) were statistically significant (P < .001). The number of medications at discharge was associated with an increased readmission risk (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.14). Conclusions: The degree of polypharmacy and patients' treatment complexity after hospital discharge significantly reduced as a result of the PC program compared with the control group. This highlights the need for patient selection and prioritization strategies for implementing PIs focused on reducing polypharmacy and preventing drug-related problems that may cause PAR.

[Cancellations of Elective Surgeries on the Day of the Operation in a Portuguese Hospital: One Year Overview]. / Cancelamentos de Cirurgias Eletivas no Próprio Dia da Operação num Hospital Português: Um Ano em Perspetiva.

INTRODUCTION: Cancellations of elective operations on the day of the surgery reflect the efficiency and quality within organisations, and have a significant clinical, social and economic impact, not only for the patient and their families, but also for healthcare institutions. This study assesses the extent of these cancellations in one public Portuguese hospital, through case quantification and identification of the causes, origin, as well as its predictability according to the sociodemographic variables of the patient and interventions used to decrease it. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Non-experimental descriptive quantitative methodology - longitudinal and retrospective - of operation cancellation cases on the day of the surgery, from the 1st of January to the 31st of December 2018. RESULTS: The rate of cancellations of elective surgeries on the same day of the operation was 2.9% with variations among different surgical specialties; cancelled operations are more frequent in female patients, in patients aged between 50 and 80 years old, physical status classified as II or III according to the American Society of Anesthesiology, and without anaesthetic pre assessment or preoperative consultations; the three most relevant causes for cancellations are: lack of operative time, scarcity of beds and/or medical equipment, and changes in health status; most of which can be avoided and are the responsibility of the institution. DISCUSSION: Different reasons for cancellation of elective operations reflect a variety of upstream and downstream processes causing cancellation of surgeries and whose origin/imputability is related to both the institution and patients. CONCLUSION: The rate of cancellations of elective surgeries on the same day of the operation is relatively low, but the causes are often preventable, thus justifying the generalization of cancellation reduction strategies.

Introdução: Os cancelamentos de cirurgias eletivas que ocorrem no próprio dia da cirurgia acarretam importantes consequências clínicas, sociais e económicas, individuais e familiares, mas também institucionais, e refletem processos de eficiência e qualidade das organizações. Este estudo pretende avaliar a dimensão dos cancelamentos no dia da cirurgia numa instituição do Serviço Nacional de Saúde, quantificando-os, identificando as causas, origem e previsibilidade, na relação com variáveis sociodemográficas e intervenções dedicadas à sua redução.Material e Métodos: Metodologia quantitativa descritiva, de abordagem não experimental, longitudinal e de dimensão temporal retrospetiva, relativa aos episódios com cancelamentos cirúrgicos no dia da cirurgia, decorridos no período compreendido entre 1 de janeiro e 31 de dezembro de 2018.Resultados: A taxa de cancelamento no próprio dia foi de 2,9%, variando entre as especialidades cirúrgicas, maioritariamente em doentes do sexo feminino, na faixa etária dos 50 aos 80 anos, com estado físico II ou III, segundo a American Society of Anestesiology, e sem consulta pré-anestésica ou pré-operatória prévias; as três causas de cancelamentos mais evidentes são: a falta de tempo operatório, a falta de camas e/ou materiais e a alteração do estado de saúde, a maioria das quais evitáveis e imputáveis à instituição.Discussão: Os múltiplos motivos de cancelamento refletem uma variedade de processos a montante e a jusante, que culminam no cancelamento cirúrgico, e cuja a origem/imputabilidade se dispersa entre a instituição e o próprio doente.Conclusão: A taxa de cancelamento de cirurgias eletivas no próprio dia da operação é relativamente baixa, mas as causas são frequentemente evitáveis, justificando a generalização de estratégias de redução dos cancelamentos.

Impact of a pharmacist and geriatrician medication review on drug-related problems in older outpatients with cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Older patients with cancer have increased risk for comorbidity, polypharmacy (PP) and drug related problems (DRP). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a clinical pharmacist and geriatrician medication review (MR) among older outpatients with cancer to optimize management of comorbidities during comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective study among older outpatients with cancer (≥75 years). A pharmacist consultation was added into CGA process. The clinical pharmacist detected and assessed PP and DRP such as potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) according to the Laroche French list and STOPP criteria, START criteria and adverse drug events (ADE) risk. After a multidisciplinary MR, the proposals for prescription modification were sent to general practitioners (GPs). RESULTS: Fifty-one consenting patients were recruited between May 2016 and March 2017, with a median age of 83 years. Prevalence of PP was 80.4%. 165 DRP were detected among 86% patients (median number of DRP = 3.0): 19.4% were misuse, 43.6% underuse, and 37.0% overuse. A significant decrease was observed in prevalence of PIM use (Laroche: 31.4% versus 5.9%, p = 0.002), START criteria (66.7% to 5.9%; P < 0.001) and ADE score (4.0 before MR versus 2.0 after, p = 0.023). A trend was observed for a lower number of medications (10.0 versus 8.0, p = 0.092) and on STOPP criteria prevalence (56.9% versus 31.4%, p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: A clinical pharmacist and a geriatrician MR is effective to detect and reduce DRP in older outpatients with cancer.

Use of medication reviews among older women with dementia, 2003-2015: A longitudinal cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with incidence of medication reviews (MRs), particularly in women with dementia and in residential aged care (RAC). METHODS: Data from 10 359 women in the 1921-1926 cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health were linked to Medicare Benefits Schedule data to identify MRs for each year from 2003 to 2015. RESULTS: Incidence of MR increased from 2003 to 2013 (age 87-92 years) when 37.1% of women with dementia had a MR compared to 19.8% of women without dementia. Adjusting for time and other factors, the odds of having a MR were higher for women with dementia (AOR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06-1.32) and women in RAC (AOR = 3.61, 95% CI: 3.28-3.98). CONCLUSIONS: Although higher in women with dementia and those in RAC, utilisation of MR was modest. System-level interventions may be required to ensure the use and benefits of MRs.

Drug utilization and expenditure of anticancer drugs for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Drug utilization studies have proven to be an effective tool in the evaluation of rational drug use in different health care systems, including oncology. The drug utilization studies were used in many institutes to ensure the safe, effective and appropriate use of drugs being prescribed. The main aim of this study was to assess the utilization pattern of anticancer drugs in breast cancer patients. METHOD: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was carried out at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC) for 1 year from January 2016 to December 2016. All female patients diagnosed with breast cancer during this year were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were included in this study. Most patients received an average of three anticancer drugs. The most commonly prescribed medication was fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen, which was used in 81% of patients. Combinations of FEC + docetaxel and FEC + docetaxel + trastuzumab were received by43% and 23% of patients, respectively. Docetaxel was the most commonly used drug in neoadjuvant setting, whereas letrozole and trastuzumab were prescribed more frequently in hormonal and targeted therapies, respectively. The total drug expenditure on anticancer therapy was approximately 3.8 million Saudi Riyals (S.R), with adjuvant therapy constituting over half of the total spending. In neoadjuvant settings, the spending cost for hormonal therapy was the highest. The condition of most breast cancer patients was improved during the study period, whereas only 29% of the included patients progressed. CONCLUSION: FEC was the most common regimen used in this study, consistent with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline recommendation. Our results indicated that adherence to a clinical guideline and recommended medication regimens improved patient outcomes. Our finding indicate how analyzing drug utilization pattern could benefit institutions in managing inventory and efficiently using health care resources.

Prospective evaluating the appropriate use of piperacillin /tazobactam in cardiac center of a tertiary care hospital.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate use of Piperacillin/Tazobactam (Pip/Taz), including the correct dose, escalating and or de-escalation according to the microbiological culture is essential to reduce the antibiotic resistance. Resistant to antimicrobials in a major global problem and contributes significantly to morbidity, mortality and cost of care. Guidelines exists to ensure appropriate use of Pip/Taz. Antibiotics Stewardship guidelines (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329404/9789241515481-eng.pdf) provides a detailed recommendation with regards to initiation, monitoring and escalation and de-escalation based on final culture results. Appling such guidelines ensures a more proper utilization of the empiric uses of antibiotics used in the hospital-based setting. Use of Pip/Taz in cases of suspected infection postoperatively is common practice in the cardiac surgery ward where this study was conducted. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study involving all patients who were admitted to the cardiac surgery unit of a tertiary care center. All patient prescribed at least 1 day of Pip/Taz as an empirical therapy were included and prospectively observed. We aimed to evaluate the use of Pip/Taz and its appropriateness based on Antibiotics Stewardship guidelines (ASG). Any deviation from the guidelines in initiation, escalation, de-escalation based on culture and sensitivity results was considered inappropriate use. Four patients died (1.3%) early as result of complications for surgery but included in the analysis. The study was conducted from October 2017 to October 2018. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients who received Pip/Taz Cultures were done in 250 patients (83%). The overall appropriate use of Pip/Taz was seen in 166 patients (55.3%). CONCLUSION: The empirical use of Pip/Taz in the surgical cardiac unit was largely inappropriate and not entirely driven by the culture test results. Interventions are needed to optimize the use of Pip/Taz including appropriate culture and sensitivity driven use and timely de-escalation or de-escalation when indicated. This will prevent emergence of resistance and reduce the patient toxicity and financial costs.

Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence? / Antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica: sua prática clínica está baseada em evidências?

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods: This was a descriptive study performed at a public tertiary care university hospital gathering prescription, sociodemographic and hospitalization data of inpatients admitted in 2014 who used antimicrobial drugs. This data were obtained from the hospital electronic database. The antimicrobial data were classified according to the anatomical, therapeutic chemical/defined daily dose per 1,000 inpatients. An exploratory analysis was performed using principal component analysis. Results: A total of 5,182 inpatients were prescribed surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Of the total antimicrobial use, 11.7% were for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. The orthopedic, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative units, and postoperative intensive care unit comprised more than half of the total surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use (56.3%). The duration of antimicrobial use of these units were 2.2, 2.0, and 1.4 days, respectively. Third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones had the longest use among antimicrobial classes. Conclusion: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was inadequate in the orthopedic, postoperative intensive care, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative, gynecology and obstetrics, and otolaryngology units. Therefore, the development and implementation of additional strategies to promote surgical antibiotic stewardship at hospitals are essential.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a utilização de antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo descritivo em um hospital universitário de cuidado terciário por meio de coleta de dados de prescrição, sociodemográficos e de hospitalização sobre todos os pacientes internados em 2014 que utilizaram pelo menos um medicamento antimicrobiano. Esses dados foram coletados da base de dados eletrônica do hospital. O consumo de antimicrobianos foi analisado de acordo com a classificação anatômica terapêutica e química/dose diária definida por mil pacientes-dia. Realizou-se uma análise exploratória por meio da análise de componentes principais. Resultados: Um total de 5.182 pacientes internados receberam prescrição de antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica, que corresponde a 11,7% do total de antibióticos utilizados no hospital. As unidades de ortopedia, pós-operatória de cirurgia torácica e cardiovascular e terapia intensiva pós-operatória foram responsáveis pela utilização de mais da metade (56,3%) da antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica. A duração de uso desses antimicrobianos nessas unidades foi 2,2, 2,0 e 2,4 dias, respectivamente. Cefalosporinas de terceira geração e fluoroquinolonas foram as classes de antimicrobianos com tempo de utilização mais longo. Conclusão: A utilização de antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica foi inadequada nas unidades de ortopedia, pós-operatória de cirurgia torácica e cardiovascular, terapia intensiva pós-operatória, ginecologia e obstetrícia e otorrinolarigonlogia. Portanto, são importantes o desenvolvimento e a implantação de estratégias que promovam o uso racional de antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica nos hospitais.

Albumin Usage in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Human albumin is an expensive therapy with inappropriate use in many clinical conditions. Inappropriate use of albumin imposes a substantial economic burden on the healthcare system and society. Drug use evaluation (DUE) is one method of assessing the appropriateness of drug use which has been powered by increasing concern about the cost-effectiveness of drugs. The objective of this study is to systematically review the appropriateness of albumin utilization in Iranian hospitals. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar for articles in English and SID, Magiran, Medlib, and Irandoc for articles in Persian from 1997 to 2018. Studies on the DUE of albumin in Iranian hospitals were included in this study. Articles conducted outside Iran, editorials, letters and review articles were excluded. RESULTS: In total, eight studies were selected for the final review. The majority of the papers were conducted in Tehran. In most studies, the highest albumin consumption was related to the intensive care unit. The most frequent reasons for prescribing albumin were edema, hypoalbuminemia, volume expansion after heart surgery, ascites, cardiac surgery and cirrhosis. Of the studies included, five studies evaluated the costs of drug use. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that inappropriate use of albumin imposes a relatively high additional cost on the society. The included studies show that the percentage of inappropriate use of albumin is relatively high in Iran and this abuse is an essential problem in Iranian hospitals. Prescription based on standard guidelines could improve rational use of albumin and lead to savings in treatment costs.

The appropriate use of human albumin in a Brazilian University Hospital: therapeutic indication and dosage regimen

The objective of the study was to evaluate the use of human albumin in a Brazilian university hospital, in compliance with the institutional protocol and other clinical guidelines, taking into account the therapeutic indications and the dosage regimens. Data was obtained from the pharmacy dispensing records of human albumin, the requests for use it and, when available, the patient's records between January and October 2017. After evaluation the therapeutic indications and the dosage regimens were classified as "appropriate" and "inappropriate". The analysis of 98 requests showed that, when compared to the institutional protocol, 54 (55.1%) requests had an inappropriate therapeutic indication. However, when a comparison was made between 25 medical records (54 requests) and other clinical guidelines, it was observed that the therapeutic indication had none classified as inappropriate. In addition, 16 (29.7%) requests were considered inappropriate in relation to dosage regimens. From these results, it was possible to conclude that although the use of human albumin in the hospital was associated to a clinical protocol, it was outdated. Thus, it is possible to affirm that not only the adoption of a clinical protocol, but its periodical updating is an important strategy to promote the rational use of drugs.

Inappropriate hospital days of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of inappropriate hospital stays in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, identify the causes for the inappropriateness and analyze the predictors. DESIGN: A retrospective review of medical records. SETTING: The cardiology and the orthopedics departments of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. PARTICIPANTS: About 806 patients discharged from the cardiology or the orthopedics department of a tertiary hospital from March 2013 to February 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Two reviewers audited 8396 hospital days of the cardiology department (n = 3606) and the orthopedics department (n = 4790) by adopting the Chinese Version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. Univariate and multivariate analysis were adopted to identify the predictors of higher levels of inappropriateness produced by internal causes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The prevalence of inappropriate hospital days. RESULTS: It was found that 910 (25.2%) and 1940 (40.5%) hospital days were judged to be inappropriate in the cardiology and the orthopedics departments, respectively; and 753 (20.9%) and 1585 (33.1%) of these inappropriate hospital days were due to internal reasons, respectively. Awaiting tests, surgery or discharge were determined to constitute the main causes of inappropriateness for both departments. The predictors of higher levels of inappropriateness in the cardiology department were younger age, self-pay, outpatient admission and inappropriate admission. Self-pay, surgical and/or first-time admission patients exhibited the highest levels of inappropriateness in the orthopedics department. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of inappropriateness in the involved departments were relatively high. Further interventions should be designed and implemented, accordingly.