Stereotactic Radiosurgery for 1-10 Brain Metastases to avoid Whole-Brain Radiotherapy - Results of the CYBER-SPACE Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is an emerging alternative to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for treating multiple brain metastases (BM), reducing toxicity and improving tumor control. The CYBER-SPACE trial compared SRS based on either SPACE or MPRAGE MRI sequence for avoiding or delaying WBRT in patients with 1-10 BM. METHODS: Patients with 1-10 untreated BM were randomized 1:1 to receive SRS of all lesions based on either SPACE or MPRAGE MRI sequences. If subsequently new BM occurred, SRS was repeated. WBRT was indicated upon occurrence of >10 new BM, leptomeningeal disease or exhausted SRS-radiotolerance. The primary outcome was freedom from WBRT indication (WBRTi). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: 202 patients were randomized; SPACE n=99, MPRAGE n=103. 12-month WBRTi-free survival was 77.1% (95%-CI: 69.5%-83.1%) overall, 78.5% (95%-CI: 66.7%-86.5%) for SPACE, and 76.0% (95%-CI: 65.2%-83.9%) for MPRAGE (HR=0.84, 95%-CI: 0.43-1.63, p=0.590). Patients with 5-10 BM had shorter WBRTi-free survival (HR=3.13, 95%-CI: 1.53-6.40, p=0.002). Median OS was 13.1 months overall, 10.5 months for SPACE, and 15.2 months for MPRAGE (HR=1.10, 95%-CI: 0.78-1.56, p=0.585). Neurologic death rate was 10.1%. Predictors for longer OS included Karnofsky Performance Status >80% (HR=0.51, 95%-CI: 0.33-0.77, p=0.002) and concurrent immunotherapy (HR=0.34, 95%-CI: 0.23-0.52, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The more sensitive SPACE sequence did not improve outcomes over MPRAGE. SRS with thorough monitoring and immediate re-treatment for new lesions decreases the need for WBRT and achieves low neurologic death rates. SRS should be considered a favorable alternative to WBRT for patients with 1-10 BM.

Lymphopenia associated with whole-brain radiotherapy and its effects on clinical outcomes of patients with brain metastases.

There is increasing awareness of radiotherapy's potential side effects, such as lymphopenia. Therefore, this study aimed to establish the association between WBRT and the development of lymphopenia in patients with brain metastases undergoing brain radiotherapy (RT), along with evaluating the corresponding clinical outcomes. Including 116 patients with brain metastases undergoing brain radiotherapy, the study collected the absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) within 2 weeks before brain radiotherapy (pre-radiotherapy, pre-RT), as well as ones at 1 and 2 months after completing RT (post-RT). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations between radiation modality and post-RT ALC. The relationships between post-RT ALC and overall survival were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariate Cox regression model. The median ALC definitely decreased at 1 month post-RT, but at 2 months post-RT, gradually rose but not to the pre-RT ALC. The multivariate analysis identified WBRT and lower pre-RT ALC as independent risk factors associated with the decrease in post-RT ALC at 1 month. It also revealed more than 4 brain metastases, G3-4 lymphopenia at 1 month and lower post-RT ALC at 2 months exhibited significantly worse prognosis regardless of the radiation modality. However, there was indeed an independent correlation between radiation modality and the outcome of intracranial progression-free survival (PFS). To approach the feasibility and reasonableness of treatment, clinicians should carefully consider various factors to achieve long-term survival of patients.

An Exploratory Analysis of the Conditional Neurocognitive Function Failure Risk in Patients Receiving Whole Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases on NRG Oncology CC001: Conditional Neurocognitive Toxicity Risk.

PURPOSE: We sought to estimate the conditional risk of development of neurocognitive function failure (NCFF) after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for patients with brain metastases (BM) on NRG Oncology CC001. In addition, we aimed to determine if factors prognostic of NCFF at time of treatment remained relevant over time. MATERIALS/METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of 518 patients enrolled on NRG CC001 in which patients with BM were randomly assigned to WBRT + memantine or hippocampal-avoidant (HA-WBRT) + memantine. Life table method was used to calculate conditional monthly hazard rates and cumulative incidence was used to estimate rates of NCFF. Risk factors associated with NCFF were analyzed using cause-specific multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: The cumulative risk of development of NCFF by 6 months was 64.0% for the entire cohort. The greatest conditional monthly hazard rate of development of neurocognitive toxicity was 2-3 months post radiation (0.97, 95% CI 0.85-1.10); this rate significantly declined and then plateaued to 0.036 (95% CI: 0-0.11) by 8 months post treatment. For 2-month survivorship without cognitive failure, HA-WBRT (HR 0.74, P=0.033) and age ≤ 61 (HR 0.62, P=0.003) continued to be protective against cognitive toxicity. In addition, conditional cumulative incidence of development of NCFF was significantly reduced with HA techniques for patients living ≥ 2 months free of cognitive dysfunction (P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Our data highlight that the greatest risk for development of neurocognitive toxicity is within the first 3 months after treatment, and therefore strategies to mitigate toxicities should focus on this initial period. Moreover, the conditional risk of neurocognitive impairment significantly declines the longer patients live with preserved cognition. Importantly, these data can be used to inform patients on how their risks of development of NCFF can change over time.

AB080. High-dose methotrexate with and without intra-thecal methotrexate and whole-brain radiotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) requires effective & well-tolerated treatment strategies. The use of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MT) with or without intra-thecal methotrexate (IT-MT) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has emerged as a prominent approach for PCNSL. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of these treatment modalities. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy identified relevant studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used: "high-dose methotrexate", "primary central nervous system lymphoma", "intra-thecal methotrexate", and "whole-brain radiotherapy". We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies & case-controlled studies evaluating the use of HD-MT with or without IT-MT and whole-brain radiotherapy in the treatment of confirmed PCNSL. Data extraction & quality assessment was conducted by two independent reviewers. Primary outcomes include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) & treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Secondary outcomes were neurological function and quality of life (QOL) assessments. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. RESULTS: We identified 5 studies, consisting of 1 RCT, 3 cohort studies, and 1 case-controlled study. Pooled analysis revealed that HD-MT with or without IT-MT and whole-brain radiotherapy significantly improved both OS and PFS compared to other treatment modalities but we found no significant difference between patients who received HD-MT with or without IT-MT. Combination therapy was generally well-tolerated, with manageable TRAE. Subgroup analyses stratified by age, disease stage, and other relevant factors demonstrated consistent efficacy and safety profiles across different patient populations. The risk of bias assessment indicated that the majority of the included studies had low-moderate risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between patients who received HD-MT with or without IT-MT plus radiotherapy, emphasizing the comparable efficacy of these treatment modalities. Combination therapy was generally well-tolerated, with manageable TRAE. This highlights the favourable safety profile of HD-MT with fewer side effects compared with the combination of IT-MT.

AB079. Whole-brain radiotherapy versus high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation for consolidation therapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is commonly used as consolidation therapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). However, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-ASCT) has emerged as an alternative approach for PCNSL. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of both treatment modalities. METHODS: The systematic review follows PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy identified relevant studies from PubMed, Europe PMC, and Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used: "primary central nervous system lymphoma", "Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation", and "whole-brain radiotherapy". We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) cohort studies evaluating the use of whole-brain radiotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of histologically-confirmed PCNSL. Publications included were limited to English language full texts that were published in the past 10 years. Data extraction & manuscript quality assessment was done by two independent reviewers with a third reviewer to resolve any discrepancy. Primary outcomes include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) & treatment related toxicity (TRT). Secondary outcomes were clinical neurological function and performance score assessments. Individual studies were assessed using the Jadad Scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. RESULTS: We identified 5 studies, consisting of 2 RCTs and 3 cohort studies. After all studies considered, analysis revealed that consolidation therapy with HD-ASCT had a better overall PFS and OS compared to whole-brain radiotherapy (P<0.005). Both groups showed similar TRT with mostly haematological toxicity. Holistically clinical cognitive functions are found to be improved in HD-ASCT Patients and poorer results are exhibited by WBRT patients primarily in executive functions. Performance statuses are scored differently across all studies with slightly preferable results shown in patients treated with HDC-ASCT. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this systematic review, HDC-ASCT might be a preferable choice of consolidative therapy as shown with better OS, PFS with similar TRT. While WBRT are more feasible and cost-efficient, risks of cognitive impairment and reduced performance status after WBRT should be considered for further treatment choices. Further randomized clinical trials with a similar scoring system are needed.

The indication of palliative whole-brain radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases: a simple prognostic scoring system in the era of stereotactic radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic irradiation has become the mainstay treatment for brain metastases (BM), and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is often used for symptom palliation. However, the survival time of patients with BM undergoing palliative WBRT (pWBRT) is limited, making it difficult to select patients who should receive treatment. METHODS: We collected patient data from 2016 to 2022 at the Shizuoka Cancer Center and retrospectively analyzed the factors related to survival time. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the survival time after WBRT. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients (median age, 66 years) who underwent pWBRT were included. The primary cancers were lung, breast, gastrointestinal tract, and other cancers in 203 (67%), 38 (13%), 33 (11%), and 27 (9%) patients, respectively. Median OS of all patients was 4.1 months. In the multivariate analysis, male sex (hazard ratio [HR]:1.4), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≤ 60 (HR:1.7), presence of extracranial metastasis (ECM) (HR:1.6), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 5 (HR:1.6), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ upper limit of normal (ULN) (HR:1.3) were significantly associated with shorter OS (all P < 0.05). To predict the OS, we created a prognostic scoring system (PSS). We gave one point to each independent prognostic factor. Median OS for patients with scores of 0-2, 3, and 4-5 were 9.0, 3.5 and 1.7 months, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex, KPS ≤ 60, presence of ECM, NLR ≥ 5, and LDH ≥ ULN were poor prognostic factors for patients with BM undergoing pWBRT. By PSS combining these factors, it may be possible to select patients who should undergo pWBRT.

Whole brain radiation therapy for patients with brain metastases: survival outcomes and prognostic factors in a contemporary institutional series.

PURPOSE: To study survival outcomes and prognostic factors in patients undergoing whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for brain metastases in the contemporary setting. METHODS: Patients undergoing WBRT from 2013-2021 were retrospectively included in an ethics-approved institutional database. Patient and treatment characteristics were assessed, including patient age, primary tumor histology, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), extracranial disease, as well as WBRT dose. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from onset of WBRT using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients (median age 63 years) were included. Most patients (52%) had ≥ 10 brain metastases, and 17% had leptomeningeal disease. WBRT was delivered with 10â€¯× 3 Gy (64%), 5â€¯× 4 Gy (25%), or other regimens (11%). Median follow-up was 4.4 months (range, 0.1-154.3), and median OS was 4.7 months (95%CI, 3.8-6.0). OS differed between histologies (p = 0.01), with the longest survival seen in breast cancer (median 7.7 months). Patients with KPS of 90-100 survived for a median of 8.3 months, compared to 4.1 months with KPS 70-80, and 1.7 months with KPS < 70 (p < 0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed that KPS had the largest impact on survival. Patients who received a WBRT dose of ≥ 30 Gy also had a reduced risk of death (HR 0.45; p < 0.001). Survival differed between subgroups reclassified according to the Rades scoring system (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Survival outcomes of patients undergoing WBRT in the contemporary era appear comparable to historical cohorts, although individual patient factors need to be considered. Patients with otherwise favorable prognostic factors may benefit from longer-course WBRT.

Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia and Its Impact on Survival in Patients with Brain Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Differences in radiation-induced lymphopenia and prognosis between methods of radiotherapy (RT) for brain metastases remain unclear. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of patients who underwent whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for brain metastases, baseline total lymphocyte count (TLC) data were obtained within 2 weeks before RT initiation. Follow-up TLC data were evaluated at 0-2, 2-4, and 4-8 weeks after RT completion. Persistent lymphopenia was defined as <800/µL at any time point. RESULTS: Overall, 138 RT courses in 128 patients were eligible (94 WBRT; 44 SRS/SRT). In the WBRT courses, the median baseline TLC was 1325/µL (IQR: 923-1799). Follow-up TLC decreased significantly to 946/µL (626-1316), 992/µL (675-1291), and 1075/µL (762-1435) (p < 0.001). SRS/SRT courses showed no significant TLC decrease. Multivariate analysis revealed female sex, prior RT, baseline TLC < 800/µL, and WBRT use were significantly associated with persistent lymphopenia. In the WBRT group, overall survival was significantly different between those with and without persistent lymphopenia (median, 2.6 and 6.1 months; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in survival in the SRS/SRT group (p = 0.60). CONCLUSION: This study suggests SRS/SRT might be preferable for lymphocyte preservation in brain metastasis patients.

Assessment of different head tilt angles in volumetric modulated arc therapy for hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy.

Purpose: In the field of radiation therapy for brain metastases, whole-brain hippocampus-avoidance treatment is commonly employed. this study aims to examine the impact of different head tilt angles on the dose distribution in the whole-brain target area and organs at risk. It also aims to determine the head tilt angle to achieve optimal radiation therapy outcomes. Methods: CT images were collected from 8 brain metastases patients at 5 different groups of head tilt angle. The treatment plans were designed using the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. The 5 groups of tilt angle were as follows: [0°,10°), [10°,20°), [20°,30°), [30°,40°), and [40°,45°]. The analysis involved assessing parameters such as the uniformity index, conformity index, average dose delivered to the target, dose coverage of the target, hot spots within the target area, maximum dose, and average dose received by organs at risk. Additionally, the study evaluated the correlation between hippocampal dose and other factors, and established linear regression models. Results: Significant differences in dosimetric results were observed between the [40°,45°] and [0°,10°) head tilt angles. The [40°,45°] angle showed significant differences compared to the [0°,10°) angle in the average dose in the target area (31.49 ± 0.29 Gy vs. 31.99 ± 0.29 Gy, p=0.016), dose uniformity (1.20 ± 0.03 vs. 1.24 ± 0.03, p=0.016), hotspots in the target area (33.64 ± 0.35 Gy vs. 34.42 ± 0.49 Gy, p=0.016), maximum hippocampal dose (10.73 ± 0.36 Gy vs. 11.66 ± 0.59 Gy, p=0.008), maximum dose in the lens (2.82 ± 1.10 Gy vs. 4.99 ± 0.16 Gy, p=0.016), and average dose in the lens (1.93 ± 0.29 Gy vs. 4.22 ± 0.26 Gy, p=0.008). There is a moderate correlation between the maximum dose in the hippocampi and the PTV length (r=0.49, p=0.001). Likewise, the mean dose in the hippocampi is significantly correlated with the hippocampi length (r=0.34, p=0.04). Conclusion: The VMAT plan with a head tilt angle of [40°,45°] met all dose constraints and demonstrated improved uniformity of the target area while reducing the dose to organs at risk. Furthermore, the linear regression models suggest that increasing the head tilt angle within the current range of [0°,45°] is likely to lead to a decrease in the average hippocampal dose.

A Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent/Progressive Solid Tumor Brain Metastases That Have Progressed Following Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy.

Patients with solid tumor brain metastases that progress after whole-brain radiation have limited options. This prospective trial investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bevacizumab as salvage therapy in this population. Eligible patients received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks until progression. The primary endpoint was radiologic response using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, and safety. Quality of life (QOL) was studied using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) scale. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, with twenty-four having evaluable data for response. The majority of histologies (n = 21, 78%) were breast cancer. The remaining histologies were non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 4, 15%), neuroendocrine cancer (n = 1, 3%), and papillary fallopian serous adenocarcinoma (n = 1, 3%). Eighteen patients had radiologic response, with two patients demonstrating partial response (8.33%) and sixteen patients demonstrating stable disease (66.7%). The median duration of response was 203 days. PFS at 6 months was 46%, median PFS was 5.3 m, and median OS was 9.5 m. Treatment was well tolerated, with six patients experiencing grade 3 lymphopenia and hypertension. There was one grade 3 thromboembolism. QOL was not negatively impacted. Bevacizumab is a safe and feasible salvage treatment with durable response and favorable overall survival for patients with progressive brain metastases after whole-brain radiation.

Incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal brain metastases and impact on hippocampal-avoiding radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In patients requiring prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs), hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life. Here, we aim to estimate the incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs and the subsequent risk of local undertreatment in patients undergoing hippocampal sparing radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched with the terms "Hippocampus", "Brain Neoplasms", and related terms. Trials reporting on the incidence of hippocampal and/or perihippocampal BMs or hippocampal failure rate after PCI or WBRT were included. RESULTS: Forty records were included, encompassing a total of 5,374 patients with over 32,570 BMs. Most trials employed a 5 mm margin to define the HA zone. In trials reporting on BM incidence, 4.4 % (range 0 - 27 %) and 9.2 % (3 - 41 %) of patients had hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs, respectively. The most common risk factor for hippocampal BMs was the total number of BMs. The reported failure rate within the HA zone after HA-PCI or HA-WBRT was 4.5 % (0 - 13 %), salvageable with radiosurgery in most cases. SCLC histology was not associated with a higher risk of hippocampal failure (OR = 2.49; p = 0.23). In trials comparing with a conventional (non-HA) PCI or WBRT group, HA did not increase the hippocampal failure rate (OR = 1.90; p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs is considerably low, with a subsequent low risk of local undertreatment following HA-PCI or HA-WBRT. In patients without involvement, the hippocampus should be spared to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life.

Modulated Arc Therapy for hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation therapy: planning comparison with intensity modulated Radiation Therapy.

This study aimed to evaluate the modulated arc therapy (mARC) technique as a planning and treatment option for hippocampal sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0933 dosimetric criteria. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were selected retrospectively for 15 patients. Two types of plans were created for each patient, namely an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and a mARC plan. IMRT and mARC plans were compared in terms of plan quality indices, absorbed dose to organs at risk (OARs), number of monitor units (MUs), and treatment time. All plans in both techniques were considered clinically acceptable for treatment. However, IMRT plans presented a higher conformity (p = 0.01) as well as a higher homogeneity as compared to mARC plans, but this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In terms of the preservation of the hippocampus, it was observed that the IMRT plans achieved significantly lower doses for both 100% of its volume and for its maximum dose (p < 0.001). The evaluation of the remaining OARs showed that the IMRT technique resulted in lower doses, and significant differences were observed for the following organs: left cochlea (p < 0.001), left eye (p < 0.001), right eye (p = 0.03), both lenses of the eye (p < 0.001), and right optic nerve (p = 0.02). Despite these differences, the absolute differences in all dosimetric parameters were low enough to bear any clinical relevance. A drastic (close to 65%) and significant (p < 0.001) decrease was observed in the number of MUs for the mARC plans. This resulted in a substantial decrease in treatment time (60.45%, p < 0.001). It is concluded that the mARC technique is a feasible planning and treatment solution for HS-WBRT that meets the RTOG 0933 criteria. The main advantage of using mARC over IMRT for HS-WBRT is the considerable reduction in MUs and treatment time.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of combined therapies incorporating whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is a standard and effective approach for brain metastases, but it is linked to neurocognitive complications, specifically issues related to the hippocampus. Innovative strategies are being explored to enhance outcomes. However, a consensus is yet to be reached in this field. Our aim is to investigate the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), memantine, and hippocampal avoidance (HA) techniques in treatment of brain metastases. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we comprehensively searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane for studies reporting the efficacy and toxicity of WBRT-based combination therapies from inception to September 19, 2023. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) for dichotomous outcomes, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Among 2175 articles, 29 studies involving 3460 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to WBRT alone, combination therapies significantly mitigated neurocognitive function decline (RD = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.18-0.01]; P = 0.03) and intracranial control failure (RR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.52-1.44]; P = 0.02), without increasing the risk of hippocampal recurrence or high-grade toxicities. Notably, HA-WBRT + SIB/memantine demonstrated improved neurocognitive outcomes and survival benefits. CONCLUSION: WBRT-based combination therapies demonstrate improved efficacy and comparable safety to WBRT alone, with specific emphasis on the effectiveness of HA-WBRT + Memantine and HA-WBRT + SIB in optimizing therapeutic outcomes for brain metastases.

High-dose methotrexate and zanubrutinib combination therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma.

In this editorial I comment on the article, published in the current issue of the World Journal of Clinical Oncology. Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a disease of elderly and immunocompromised patients. The authors reported clinical results of 19 patients with PCNSL treated with zanubrutinib/high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) until disease progression. They demonstrated that the combination of zanubrutinib with HD-MTX led to a marked clinical response and tolerability among these patients. They also observed that cerebrospinal fluid liquid biopsy to detect circulating tumor DNA may be a good option for evaluating treatment response and tumor burden in patients with PCNSL. PCNSL is a challenging disease for treatment as these patients present with different neurological states and comorbidities. Treatment has evolved over the years from whole brain radiotherapy to HD-MTX followed by autologous stem cell transplant. Gradually, treatment of patients with PCNSL is going to become individualized.

Survival outcomes and treatment experience of 124 patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare malignancy of the central nervous system with high invasiveness. There is little consensus on the treatment of PCNSL. This study retrospectively studied data from PCNSL patients in a single center to summarize treatment experience and explore prognostic factors. METHODS: Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox's hazards model. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, cerebrospinal fluid lactic acid dehydrogenase (CSF LDH; p = 0.005 and p = 0.002), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR; p = 0.014 and p = 0.038), and completion of four cycles of induction therapy (p < 0.001and p < 0.001) were significant and independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. CONCLUSION: On the basis of this study, we propose that PCNSL patients should receive early induction therapy with sufficient cycles. Subsequent consolidation therapy can prevent relapses and improve survival. In patients with PCNSL, the independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS were CSF LDH level, NLR, and full cycles of induction therapy.

DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the existing evidence for radiotherapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients and provide recommendations for the use of radiotherapy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the current review, a PubMed search was conducted including articles from 01/1985 to 05/2023. The search was performed using the following terms: (brain metastases OR leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) AND (breast cancer OR breast) AND (radiotherapy OR ablative radiotherapy OR radiosurgery OR stereotactic OR radiation). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Despite the fact that the biological subtype of breast cancer influences both the occurrence and relapse patterns of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), for most scenarios, no specific recommendations regarding radiotherapy can be made based on the existing evidence. For a limited number of BCBM (1-4), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is generally recommended irrespective of molecular subtype and concurrent/planned systemic therapy. In patients with 5-10 oligo-brain metastases, these techniques can also be conditionally recommended. For multiple, especially symptomatic BCBM, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), if possible with hippocampal sparing, is recommended. In cases of multiple asymptomatic BCBM (≥ 5), if SRS/SRT is not feasible or in disseminated brain metastases (> 10), postponing WBRT with early reassessment and reevaluation of local treatment options (8-12 weeks) may be discussed if a HER2/Neu-targeting systemic therapy with significant response rates in the central nervous system (CNS) is being used. In symptomatic leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, local radiotherapy (WBRT or local spinal irradiation) should be performed in addition to systemic therapy. In patients with disseminated leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in good clinical condition and with only limited or stable extra-CNS disease, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) may be considered. Data regarding the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial and spinal radiotherapy are sparse. Therefore, no clear recommendations can be given, and each case should be discussed individually in an interdisciplinary setting.

A new updated prognostic index for patients with brain metastases (BMs) treated with palliative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in the era of precision oncology. METASNCore project.

INTRODUCTION: Palliative WBRT is the main treatment for multiple BMs. Recent studies report no benefit in survival after WBRT compared to palliative supportive care in patients (pts) with poor prognosis. A new era of systemic treatment strategies based on targeted therapies are improving the prognosis of patients with BMs. The purpose of this study is to develop a prognostic score in palliative pts with BMs who undergo WBRT in this new setting. METHODS: 239 pts with BMs who received palliative WBRT between 2013-2022 in our center were analyzed retrospectively. The score was designed according to the value of the ß coefficient of each variable with statistical significance in the multivariate model using Cox regression. Once the score was established, a comparison was performed according to Kaplan-Meier and was analyzed by log-rank test. RESULTS: 149 pts (62.3%) were male and median (m) age was 60 years. 139 (58,2%) were lung cancer and 35 (14,6%) breast cancer. All patients received 30Gys in 10 sessions. m overall survival (OS) was 3,74 months (ms). 37 pts (15,5%) had a specific target mutation. We found that 62 pts were in group < 4 points with mOS 6,89 ms (CI 95% 3,18-10,62), 84 in group 4-7 points with mOS 4,01 ms (CI 95% 3,40-4,62) and 92 pts in group > 7 points with mOS 2,72 ms (CI 95% 1,93-3,52) (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: METASNCore items are associated with OS and they could be useful to select palliative pts to receive WBRT. More studies are necessary to corroborate our findings.

Reirradiation of metastases of the central nervous system: part 1-brain metastasis.

Because of improved survival of cancer patients, more patients irradiated for brain metastases develop intracerebral recurrences requiring subsequent courses of radiotherapy. Five studies focused on reirradiation with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) after initial WBRT for brain metastases. Following the second WBRT course, improvement of clinical symptoms was found in 31-68% of patients. Rates of neurotoxicity, such as encephalopathy or cognitive decline, were reported in two studies (1.4% and 32%). In another study, severe or unexpected adverse events were not observed. Survival following the second WBRT course was generally poor, with median survival times of 2.9-4.1 months. The survival prognosis of patients receiving two courses of WBRT can be estimated by a scoring tool considering five prognostic factors. Three studies investigated reirradiation with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) following primary WBRT. One-year local control rates were 74-91%, and median survival times ranged between 7.8 and 14 months. Rates of radiation necrosis (RN) after reirradiation were 0-6%. Seven studies were considered that investigated re-treatment with SF-SRS or fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) following initial SF-SRS or FSRT. One-year local control rates were 60-88%, and the median survival times ranged between 8.3 and 25 months. During follow-up after reirradiation, rates of overall (asymptomatic or symptomatic) RN ranged between 12.5% and 30.4%. Symptomatic RN occurred in 4.3% to 23.9% of cases (patients or lesions). The risk of RN associated with symptoms and/or requiring surgery or corticosteroids appears lower after reirradiation with FSRT when compared to SF-SRS. Other potential risk factors of RN include the volume of overlap of normal tissue receiving 12 Gy at the first course and 18 Gy at the second course of SF-SRS, maximum doses ≥40 Gy of the first or the second SF-SRS courses, V12 Gy >9 cm3 of the second course, initial treatment with SF-SRS, volume of normal brain receiving 5 Gy during reirradiation with FSRT, and systemic treatment. Cumulative EQD2 ≤100-120 Gy2 to brain, <100 Gy2 to brainstem, and <75 Gy2 to chiasm and optic nerves may be considered safe. Since most studies were retrospective in nature, prospective trials are required to better define safety and efficacy of reirradiation for recurrent or progressive brain metastases.

Temporal Considerations in Brain Metastases Radiation Therapy: The Intersection of Chronobiology and Patient Profiles.

The circadian system, a vital temporal regulator influencing physiological processes, has implications for cancer development and treatment response. Our study assessed circadian timing's impact on whole-brain radiotherapy outcomes in brain metastases for personalized cancer therapy insights. The aim of the study was to evaluate circadian influence on radiation treatment timing and its correlation with clinical outcomes and to identify patient populations benefiting from interventions synchronizing circadian rhythms, considering subgroup differences and potential disparities. An IRB-approved retrospective analysis of 237 patients undergoing whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (2017-2021), receiving over 80% of treatments in the morning or afternoon, was performed. Survival analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier curves. This was a single-institution study involving patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy. Demographic, disease, and socioeconomic parameters from electronic medical records were collected. Morning treatment (n = 158) showed a trend toward improved overall survival vs. afternoon (n = 79); the median survival was 158 vs. 79 days (p = 0.20, HR = 0.84, CI95% 0.84-0.91). Subgroup benefits for morning treatment in females (p = 0.04) and trends in controlled primary disease (p = 0.11) and breast cancer metastases (p = 0.08) were observed. Black patients exhibited diminished circadian influence. The present study emphasized chronobiological factors' relevance in brain metastases radiation therapy. Morning treatment correlated with improved survival, particularly in specific subgroups. Potential circadian influence disparities were identified, laying a foundation for personalized cancer therapy and interventions synchronizing circadian rhythms for enhanced treatment efficacy.

G-CSF improving combined whole brain radiotherapy and immunotherapy prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic advantage of G-CSF to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in combination with immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 117 patients (37 in G-CSF group and 80 in no G-CSF group) who underwent first-line WBRT combined with immunotherapy were enrolled. Their survival, intracranial response, BM-related symptoms and toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) of patients in G-CSF group was significantly improved compared to patients no G-CSF group (median time: 14.8 vs 10.2 months; HR: 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.38-0.97, p = 0.035). However, there were no significant differences in intracranial responses between the two groups (p > 0.05). The G-CSF group exhibited a significantly higher rate of relief from BM-related symptoms compared to the no G-CSF group (91.7 % vs 59.5 %, p = 0.037). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses indicated that after-treatment ALC > 0.9 × 10^9/L (HR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.32-0.99, p = 0.046) and Hb > 110 g/dL (HR 0.41, 95 % CI 0.24-0.71, p = 0.001) were significant potential factors associated with extended OS. The addition of G-CSF was well tolerated and effectively reduced the incidence of neutropenia (0 % vs 5.0 %, p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Integrating G-CSF with WBRT and immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for NSCLC-BMs has exhibited significant efficacy and favorable tolerability.