Carboplatin desensitization in the era of target therapies: still worthwhile?

PURPOSE: Unresectable pediatric low-grade gliomas (LGG) usually need adjuvant therapy, and carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction (HR) commonly leads to premature treatment cessation of a standard chemotherapy regimen. In the molecular era, advances in understanding tumor genetic characteristics allowed the development of targeted therapies for this group of tumors; however, cost-effectiveness assessment of treatments, especially in low-income countries, is crucial. The aim is to describe the results of carboplatin desensitization protocol in a single center in a middle-income country. METHOD: Prospective analysis of children with LGG submitted to carboplatin desensitization from December 2017 to June 2020 with follow-up until April 2024. RESULTS: Nine patients were included. The mean age was 11 years. Five patients were male. Seven had optic pathway and two cervicomedullary location. Six had histologic diagnosis and four molecular analyses. The incidence of carboplatin reactions during the study period was 39.1%. Six patients underwent skin prick test, three with positive results. The first HR occurred, on average, around the 9th cycle of treatment. All patients had cutaneous symptoms, and five out of nine had anaphylaxis as the first reaction. 77.7% of the patients completed the protocol, and the clinical benefit rate (stable disease and partial response) was 88.8%. Six patients further required other lines of therapy. Monthly, the total cost for carboplatin was $409.09, and for target therapies (dabrafenib plus trametinib), $4929.28 to $5548.57. CONCLUSION: Our study presented an interesting and cost-effective option where desensitization allowed children with HR to be treated with first-line therapy, avoiding the discontinuation of an effective treatment.

[The efficacy and safety of protein A immunoadsorption combined with rituximab treatment for highly sensitized patients undergoing haplo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of protein A immunoadsorption (PAIA) combined with rituximab (RTX) in highly sensitized patients who underwent haplo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) . Methods: The clinical data of 56 highly sensitized patients treated with PAIA and RTX before haplo-HSCT at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Soochow Hopes Hematonosis Hospital between March 2021 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody types and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), humoral immunity, adverse reactions during adsorption, and survival within 100 days before and after adsorption were measured. Results: After receiving the PAIA treatment, the median MFI of patients containing only HLA Ⅰ antibodies decreased from 7 859 (3 209-12 444) to 3 719 (0-8 275) (P<0.001), and the median MFI of HLA Ⅰ+Ⅱ antibodies decreased from 5 476 (1 977-12 382) to 3 714 (0-11 074) (P=0.035). The median MFI of patients with positive anti-donor-specific antibodies decreased from 8 779 (2 697-18 659) to 4 524 (0-15 989) (P<0.001). The number of HLA-A, B, C, DR, and DQ antibodies in all patients decreased after the PAIA treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (A, B, C, DR: P<0.001, DQ: P<0.01). The humoral immune monitoring before and after the PAIA treatment showed a significant decrease in the number of IgG and complement C3 (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). Forty-four patients underwent HLA antibody monitoring after transplantation, and the overall MFI and number of antibody types decreased. However, five patients developed new antibodies with low MFI, and nine patients continued to have high MFI. The overall survival, disease-free survival, non-recurrent mortality, and cumulative recurrence rates at 100 days post-transplantation were 83.8%, 80.2%, 16.1%, and 4.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of PAIA and RTX has a certain therapeutic effect and good safety in the desensitization treatment of highly sensitive patients before haplo-HSCT.

Daratumumab for De-sensitization of Donor Specific Antibodies: Is it a Quicker and Easier way?

Antibodies directed against donor-specific HLA loci (DSA) has been proved as a main culprit for graft rejection, more specifically in HLA mismatched and haplo-identical transplant settings. There is no standardized regimen to manage the presence of DSAs in allogeneic stem cell transplantations (allo-SCTs). Most widely regimen includes combination of rituximab (anti CD20 antibody), Immunoglobulin (IVIG), plasma exchange, and buffy coat infusion, which is costly and time-consuming. Daratumumab (anti CD38 monoclonal antibody) is an effective therapeutic agent to deplete plasma cells and hence, it has a potential to reduce DSA. It has been utilized widely in solid organ transplantation for this purpose. We used this agent in two haplo-identical transplant patients to eliminate or reduce DSA. We observed definite either reduction or elimination in DSA levels in these cases and we could perform haplo-identical transplantation without much delay and with successful primary engraftment in both scenarios. We emphasize that literature on real-world utilization of daratumumab in allo-SCTs is limited. However, it has been utilized widely in solid organ transplantation for this purpose. Our experience with daratumumab regarding effective reduction of DSA followed by successful engraftment might encourage its use in de-sensitization protocols without much delay in transplantation.

CircARAP2 controls sMICA-induced NK cell desensitization by erasing CTCF/PRC2-induced suppression in early endosome marker RAB5A.

Natural killer cells (NK) are the "professional killer" of tumors and play a crucial role in anti-tumor immunotherapy. NK cell desensitization is a key mechanism of tumor immune escape. Dysregulated NKG2D-NKG2DL signaling is a primary driver of this desensitization process. However, the factors that regulate NK cell desensitization remain largely uncharacterized. Here, we present the first report that circular RNA circARAP2 (hsa_circ_0069396) is involved in the soluble MICA (sMICA)-induced NKG2D endocytosis in the NK cell desensitization model. CircARAP2 was upregulated during NK cell desensitization and the loss of circARAP2 alleviated NKG2D endocytosis and NK cell desensitization. Using Chromatin isolation by RNA purification (ChIRP) and RNA pull-down approaches, we identified that RAB5A, a molecular marker of early endosomes, was its downstream target. Notably, transcription factor CTCF was an intermediate functional partner of circARAP2. Mechanistically, we discovered that circARAP2 interacted with CTCF and inhibited the recruitment of CTCF-Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) to the promoter region of RAB5A, thereby erasing histone H3K27 and H3K9 methylation suppression to enhance RAB5A transcription. These data demonstrate that inhibition of circARAP2 effectively alleviates sMICA-induced NKG2D endocytosis and NK cell desensitization, providing a novel target for therapeutic intervention in tumor immune evasion.

Pretransplant desensitization of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies with plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin produces equivalent outcomes to patients with no donor specific antibodies in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant.

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplants (haplo-HCT) with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) are associated with high rates of primary graft failure and poor overall survival (OS). Limited data exists regarding the effect of desensitization. Our institution began routine desensitization for patients with DSAs in 2014. Adult patients undergoing haplo-HCT at Washington University from 2009-2021 were identified and divided into three cohorts: no DSA, untreated DSA (2009-2014) or treated DSA (2014-2021). Desensitization therapy using plasmapheresis and IVIg was performed. Retrospectively, 304 patients were identified. 14 of 30 patients with DSAs underwent desensitization. By day +2, 57% of patients cleared all DSAs. After multivariable analysis, OS was similar between treated DSA and no DSA (HR: 0.69, p = 0.37). Untreated DSA had significantly lower OS compared to no DSA group (HR 1.80, p = 0.046). Desensitization with a backbone of plasmapheresis and IVIg before haplo-HCT may produce similar outcomes to patients without DSAs.

Drug Reactions and Desensitization to Chemotherapeutic Agents: An Overview and Case Study.

Certain chemotherapy agents have an increased potential to cause allergic reactions. These reactions can vary in severity from mild to severe, and a change in treatment may be suggested for the patient to avoid the causative.

Cystic fibrosis: desensitization in delayed hypersensitivity reactions to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor.

Background: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators are the only available treatment for cystic fibrosis. Although elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) is well-tolerated, rash has been reported as very frequent. In severe rashes, ELX/TEZ/IVA withdrawal is necessary, leading to clinical deterioration. The objective of the study is to increment the experience of ELX/TEZ/IVA desensitization. Methods: Adult patients who developed a delayed hypersensitivity rash to ELX/TEZ/IVA between December 2021 and February 2023 and required withdrawal due to ineffective rescue medication were included. Skins test for ELX/TEZ/IVA and IVA were conducted to establish hypersensitivity mechanism. Balijepally ELX/TEZ/IVA desensitization protocol was selected. In cases where desensitization had to be discontinued due to rash, an extended desensitization was proposed. Clinical and health-related quality of life parameters were collected before ELX/TEZ/IVA and after desensitization. Results: 162 patients (81 women, 31.2 [23.8-42.5] years) started ELX/TEZ/IVA, developing rash 12 of them (7.4%, six women). Six patients (five women) required stopping ELX/TEZ/IVA and were selected for desensitization. Skin tests indicated delayed type-IV hypersensitivity in one patient. Two patients presented adequate tolerance to desensitization; while, four patients developed rash. Three of these patients, successfully concluded extended desensitization (one patient declined participation). No significant clinical deterioration or quality of life worsening was observed during desensitization; in fact, there was an improvement in practically all mesured parameters. All five patients who resumed ELX/TEZ/IVA are currently receiving therapy with good tolerance. Conclusion: Desensitization to ELX/TEZ/IVA could be a successful and safe strategy for reintroducing this essential treatment in cases of a delayed hypersensitivity rash.

Desensitization Strategies for Donor-Specific Antibodies in HLA-Mismatched Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients: What We Know and What We Do Not Know.

In human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantation settings, donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) can independently lead to graft failure, including both primary graft rejection and primary poor graft function. Although several strategies, such as plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and bortezomib, have been used for DSA desensitization, the effectiveness of desensitization and transplantation outcomes in some patients remain unsatisfactory. In this review, we summarized recent research on the prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies and the underlying mechanism of DSAs in the pathogenesis of graft failure. We mainly focused on desensitization strategies for DSAs, especially novel methods that are being investigated in the preclinical stage and those with promising outcomes after preliminary clinical application.

A Single Centre Experience of Effective Desensitization Strategy for Children with High Anti-HLA Donor-Specific Antibodies Undergoing Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

To assess the incidence of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies and the effectiveness of desensitization strategy in children who underwent haploidentical HSCT at our hospital. A retrospective review, management and outcomes of children with positive anti-HLA DSA who underwent haploidentical HSCT at our hospital from 2020 to 2022. Three patients with Thalassemia major were treated with 2 cycles of pretransplant immune suppression (PTIS) comprising Fludarabine and Dexamethasone in addition to desensitization. Five out of the 26 children who underwent haploidentical HSCT had positive anti-HLA DSA. Post desensitization, three out of the 5 children engrafted with sustained full donor chimerism, 1 patient developed primary graft rejection, while 1 patient died. It is feasible to desensitize children with high anti-HLA donor specific antibodies undergoing haploidentical HSCT to improve outcomes.

[Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis : A retrospective analysis of therapeutic approaches in 463 patients]. / Chronische Rhinosinusitis mit Polyposis nasi : Retrospektive Analyse des therapeutischen Vorgehens bei 463 Patienten.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease, the treatment of which has undergone significant changes in recent years. In addition to surgical approaches, topical and systemic steroids, and adaptive acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) desensitization, three specific antibodies have complemented the therapeutic portfolio since 2019. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of all patients who presented as outpatients for the first time due to CRSwNP in 2007 and 2008 (collective A) and 2017 and 2018 (collective B) was performed, up to and including June 2023. RESULTS: The clinical courses of 463 patients (mean age 49.1 years, range 5-82 years; 65.9% male) were included in the analysis. Conservative treatment with nasal corticosteroids started before initial presentation was more frequent in collective B (collective A 43.9% vs. collective B 72.2%). In 278 of the 463 patients (60%; A: 62%, B: 58%), at least one operation on the nasal sinuses had been performed after initial presentation; in 101 of these patients (36.3%) recurrent polyposis (within mean follow-up of 2.4 years) required further treatment. The indication for ASA provocation/desensitization was applied less frequently in collective B, also due to a high discontinuation rate (at least 38%) of the maintenance therapy. Of the total cohort, 16 patients (3.5%; A: n = 8, B: n = 8) were meanwhile switched to antibody therapy at recurrence. CONCLUSION: A step-by-step guideline-orientated approach is recommended in the treatment of CRSwNP. Systemic antibodies as an add-on to nasal corticosteroids are a relatively new therapeutic option for treatment-refractory CRSwNP, which reduces the indication for ASA desensitization, which is associated with a relatively high incidence of side effects and poor compliance.

Biologics Reduce Symptoms of Alcohol Intolerance Better than Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with N-ERD and Nasal Polyps.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is associated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and NSAID hypersensitivity. An overproduction of leukotrienes characterizes the pathomechanism of the disease. N-ERD patients often report breathing difficulties after consuming alcohol. These symptoms have been observed in patients receiving either aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD), therapy with the biologics dupilumab (anti-IL-4Ra antibody) and omalizumab (anti-IgE antibody), or intranasal corticosteroid treatment (INCS). METHODS: This retrospective, real-world study assessed the severity of alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related respiratory symptoms in CRSwNP/N-ERD patients 3-6 months after ATAD, biologic (dupilumab or omalizumab), or INCS therapy. A total of 171 patients (98 women and 73 men) were enrolled in the study. All groups received standard INCS therapy. Sixty-three patients were treated with ATAD; 48 received biologics (dupilumab n = 31; omalizumab n = 17); and 60 received INCS only and served as a control group. Alcohol-dependent symptoms and typical CRS symptoms (alcohol-independent) were quantified using visual analog scales (VAS). RESULTS: ATAD and biological therapy significantly reduced VAS scores for alcohol dependence and CRS symptoms. In the control group receiving INCS, only non-alcohol dependent CRS symptoms improved significantly (p < 0.05). The most significant differences in pre/post scores were observed in patients receiving dupilumab, with the most significant improvement in alcohol-dependent and CRS symptoms (dupilumab > omalizumab > ATAD). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study shows that alcohol-related respiratory symptoms are a relevant parameter in CRSwNP/N-ERD patients. Patients benefit more from biologic therapy than from ATAD in terms of their alcohol-related symptoms and other CRS symptoms. Future studies should include placebo-controlled oral alcohol challenge.

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) treatment in the medical setting: a systematic review.

Background: Literature points towards the potential benefits of the application of Eye Movement and Desensitization Processing (EMDR)-therapy for patients in the medical setting, with cancer and pain being among the domains it is applied to. The field of applying EMDR-therapy for patients treated in the medical setting has evolved to such an extent that it may be challenging to get a comprehensive overview.Objective: This systematic literature review aims to evaluate the use and effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in patients treated in the medical setting.Methods: We performed a literature search following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if the effectiveness of EMDR-therapy was assessed in adult patients treated in a medical setting. Excluded were patients exclusively suffering from a mental health disorder, without somatic comorbidity. A risk of bias analysis was performed. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022325238).Results: Eighty-seven studies, of which 26 (pilot)-RCTs were included and categorized in 14 medical domains. Additionally, three studies focusing on persistent physical complaints were included. Most evidence exists for its application in the fields of oncology, pain, and neurology. The overall appraisal of these studies showed at least moderate to high risks of bias. EMDR demonstrated effectiveness in reducing symptoms in 85 out of 87 studies. Notably, the occurrence of adverse events was rarely mentioned.Conclusions: Overall, outcomes seem to show beneficial effects of EMDR on reducing psychological and physical symptoms in patients treated in a medical setting. Due to the heterogeneity of reported outcomes, effect sizes could not be pooled. Due to the high risk of bias of the included studies, our results should be interpreted with caution and further controlled high-quality research is needed.

First overview on the use of EMDR for adult patients treated in the medical setting.EMDR seems beneficial in improving psychological and physical symptoms.Given the heterogeneity of studies and high risk of bias, further controlled studies are needed in this field.

Successful osimertinib rechallenge without concomitant corticosteroids after osimertinib-induced pneumonitis.

A 60-year-old woman was diagnosed with cT4N3M1c stage IVB lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation of exon19 deletion. After one month of treatment with osimertinib, a cough and diffuse ground glass opacities were observed in the bilateral lung field. Based on the clinical course and the exclusion of other etiologies, osimertinib-induced pneumonitis was diagnosed. The shadows resolved after osimertinib was discontinued. However, brain metastasis and leptomeningeal metastasis developed 20 months later; therefore, osimertinib was re-administered without concomitant corticosteroids. The pulmonary lesion and leptomeningeal metastasis were successfully treated without recurrence of drug-induced pneumonitis for eight months.

Stepwise Incremental Dose Schedule of Sirolimus Is Successfully Tolerated by a Patient With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Who Was Initially Allergic to mTOR Inhibitors.

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare disease involving the proliferation of LAM cells in the lungs and the axial lymphatic system and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are the only effective medicines for treating it. Patients suffering from LAM, who are allergic to mTOR inhibitors can be treated by desensitizing them to the medicine. A 39-year-old woman presented with dyspnea caused by chylous pleural effusion, ascites, and retroperitoneal lymphangioleiomyomas. She was diagnosed with LAM based on the presence of LAM cell clusters (LCCs) in chylous pleural effusion and elevated serum vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) concentration. She was allergic to cedars and yellowtails. Although she was started on sirolimus for treating LAM, the drug had to be discontinued on day 45 because of the appearance of a skin rash on her trunk. A year later, another oral mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, was initiated but had to be discontinued because of the appearance of cutaneous reactions. Since mTOR inhibitors are the only effective molecular-target medicines for LAM, desensitization to sirolimus was attempted by initiating exposure to sirolimus at a low dose followed by stepwise dose escalation. Eventually, the patient tolerated a dose of 0.5 mg/day of sirolimus, which resulted in a trough concentration of approximately 2 ng/ml in blood, without adverse cutaneous reactions; furthermore, clinically relevant effects were observed as her LAM condition reduced and stabilized. This case study illustrates that mTOR inhibitor therapy for LAM should not be abandoned because of allergic cutaneous reactions. Physicians must find a dose that balances adverse events and therapeutic effects to ensure continued treatment for patients with LAM. Furthermore, the possible mechanisms for mTOR inhibitor-induced cutaneous reactions have been discussed.

TRAF6-mediated ubiquitination of AKT in the nucleus is a critical event underlying the desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) refers to the attenuation of receptor responsiveness by prolonged or intermittent exposure to agonists. The binding of ß-arrestin to the cytoplasmic cavity of the phosphorylated receptor, which competes with the G protein, has been widely accepted as an extensive model for explaining GPCRs desensitization. However, studies on various GPCRs, including dopamine D2-like receptors (D2R, D3R, D4R), have suggested the existence of other desensitization mechanisms. The present study employed D2R/D3R variants with different desensitization properties and utilized loss-of-function approaches to uncover the mechanisms underlying GPCRs homologous desensitization, focusing on the signaling cascade that regulates the ubiquitination of AKT. RESULTS: AKT undergoes K8/14 ubiquitination by TRAF6, which occurs in the nucleus and promotes its membrane recruitment, phosphorylation and activation under receptor desensitization conditions. The nuclear entry of TRAF6 relies on the presence of the importin complex. Src regulates the nuclear entry of TRAF6 by mediating the interaction between TRAF6 and importin ß1. Ubiquitinated AKT translocates to the plasma membrane where it associates with Mdm2 to phosphorylate it at the S166 and S186 residues. Thereafter, phosphorylated Mdm2 is recruited to the nucleus, resulting in the deubiquitination of ß-Arr2. The deubiquitinated ß-Arr2 then forms a complex with Gßγ, which serves as a biomarker for GPCRs desensitization. Like in D3R, ubiquitination of AKT is also involved in the desensitization of ß2 adrenoceptors. CONCLUSION: Our study proposed that the property of a receptor that causes a change in the subcellular localization of TRAF6 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus to mediate AKT ubiquitination could initiate the desensitization of GPCRs.

Indução oral rápida de tolerância a alopurinol: um relato de caso / Rapid induction of oral tolerance to allopurinol: a case report

O alopurinol, de uso contínuo oral, é o tratamento de escolha para os distúrbios hereditários do glicogênio. Apesar de não ser comum, a reação de hipersensibilidade ao alopurinol se torna um problema quando esta é a única medicação disponível para o controle da doença de base. Nestes casos, a dessensibilização é uma alternativa viável. No presente relato, descrevemos o caso de um paciente com diagnóstico de doença de depósito de glicogênio tipo I, com exantema pruriginoso generalizado ao alopurinol, tratado com um protocolo de dessensibilização oral acelerado. Este tratamento permitiu o uso contínuo deste medicamento sem novas reações em longo prazo.

Continuous oral allopurinol use is the first-line treatment for hereditary glycogen disorders. While hypersensitivity reactions to allopurinol are uncommon, they can pose challenges when this medication is the only available option for the long-term treatment of the underlying disorder. In such cases, desensitization emerges as a viable alternative. We report the case of a patient with glycogen storage disease type I who developed a generalized pruritic rash due to allopurinol. Drug intolerance was successfully managed using a rapid oral desensitization protocol, which allowed an uneventful long-term use of allopurinol.

Oxaliplatin desensitization for ovarian cancer in pregnancy: A case report.

•Incidence of cancer in pregnancy is rising and successful treatment of these patients requires expert multidisciplinary care.•Platinum hypersensitivity reactions in ovarian cancer are commonly treated with desensitization protocols.•To our knowledge, chemotherapy desensitization in pregnant patients has not been previously reported.•Oxaliplatin desensitization during pregnancy may be safe and feasible.

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Taxanes: A Multicenter Study for Outcomes and Safety of Rapid Drug Desensitization.

PURPOSE: Taxanes can cause hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), which pose a significant challenge in the treatment of malignancies. Patients who are eligible for rapid drug desensitization (RDD) can continue treatment; however, some patients experience breakthrough reactions (BTRs). Data about risk factors for BTRs during RDDs in patients with HSRs to taxanes are limited. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective study of patients with immediate-HSRs to taxanes. Initial HSRs were classified as grade 1, 2, or 3 based on severity. Prick/intradermal skin tests were performed with implicated taxanes. A 12-step protocol was used during RDD. RESULTS: The study comprised 75 patients (F/M: 63/12, mean age 49.92 ± 11.72 years, 43 HSRs to paclitaxel, 32 HSRs to docetaxel). The majority of reactions (86.7%) occurred during the first or second exposure. The prevalence of drug allergy history was higher in patients with paclitaxel HSR than in those with docetaxel HSR, although it was not statistically significant (23.3% vs. 6.3%). The initial HSRs were mostly grade 2 (n = 50, 66.7%) or grade 3 (n = 22, 29.3%). Skin tests with implicated taxanes were done on 48 patients, and the rate of positive response in patients with grade 1, 2, and 3 initial HSRs were 50%, 17.6%, and 16.7%, respectively. . A total of 255 RDDs were completely performed, although BTRs occurred in 27 (grade 1, 55.6%; grade 2, 40.7%; grade 3, 3.7%). There were no statistically significant correlations between the risk of BTR and age, drug cycle, gender, positivity of skin test or atopy. The step reduction was successfully done on 9 eligible patients with mild or moderate HSRs during the 12-step RDDs. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrates a 100% success rate in completing the 255 RDDs for taxanes, affirming the safety and efficacy of the RDD within the study population.