Provision and outcomes of publicly funded bariatric surgery in a metropolitan versus a provincial population of New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is an important health problem worldwide. The prevalence of obesity in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ) is the third highest amongst OECD countries. Previous studies have demonstrated inequity in the provision of bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) across AoNZ, but detailed data regarding patients and surgical outcomes is lacking. The aim of this study is to examine the rates and outcomes of BMS between patients domiciled in a metropolitan versus provincial area in AoNZ. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective observational cohort study of all patients who received BMS domiciled in a metropolitan or a provincial area in the Northern region of AoNZ was performed. Interrogation of patient electronic medical records and clinical notes was performed to collect the required baseline characteristics, secondary outcome measure data and confirm domicile. RESULTS: The rate of BMS was 6.1 times higher in the population with class III obesity domiciled in the metropolitan versus the provincial population. Patients in the metropolitan area were less obese, had lower rates of diabetes and had a wider range of procedures performed. Maori were underrepresented in both cohorts. There was a higher resolution of diabetes in the provincial patients. CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted significant differences in the rate, type and outcomes of BMS between a metropolitan and provincial area in the Northern region of AoNZ. This represents a significant health inequity. Changes in national and regional policies are needed to ensure equitable care for patients with obesity in AoNZ.

Association of rurality and health professional shortages with the clinicopathologic characteristics of melanoma in North Carolina.

PURPOSE: To assess rural-urban and health professional shortage area (HPSA)-related influences on the characteristics of melanoma in North Carolina. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients living in North Carolina with an available pathology report for invasive cutaneous melanoma seen in the Duke University Health System from 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2020. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to compare patient and tumor characteristics between rural versus urban county residence as well between melanoma thicknesses dichotomized into thin (≤1.0 mm) and thicker (>1.0 mm) tumors. FINDINGS: The cohort included 807 patients, and rural patients accounted for 177 (21.9%) of invasive cutaneous melanomas. Rural patients had significantly higher odds of having thicker tumors than urban patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-2.71; P = .008). Rural patients were significantly more likely to be female (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.10-2.28; P = .013) and located in a population-based (OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.84-3.84; P<.001) or geographic-based (OR = 8.21, 95% CI: 3.33-20.22; P<.001) HPSA. Living in a medium- or high-shortage population-based HPSA was associated with higher odds of thicker tumors (OR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.85-3.80; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients living in rural North Carolina counties were more likely than those in urban counties to be diagnosed with melanomas >1.0 mm in thickness, a clinically significant difference with important prognostic implications. Interventions at the county- and state-level to address this disparity may include improving access to skin cancer screening and teledermatology programs, increasing partnerships with primary care providers, and targeting interventions to counties with health professional shortages.

Breaking Barriers: Ensuring Gender Neutral Care on Short Term Surgical Missions.

INTRODUCTION: Gender discrimination is prevalent worldwide in medical and surgical care. In the setting of short-term surgical missions (STSMs) conducted to address the global burden of surgical disease, patient selection raises ethical considerations regarding equitable distribution of limited clinical resources. The goal of this study was to examine if equitable distribution of operative care between male and female patients occurs in STSMs. METHODS: The International Surgical Health Initiative (ISHI) is a US based nonprofit, nongovernmental organization. Records from surgical missions to Ghana (2014-2023) and Sierra Leone (2013-2023) were analyzed to evaluate for gender equity in inguinal hernia repairs, the most common procedure performed. A control group was created from a literature review inclusive of all studies of inguinal hernia repairs that included over 500 patients and patient gender. RESULTS: The review of 26 studies, representing 3,239,043 patients, demonstrated a gender distribution of 13% female. In Sierra Leone 246 inguinal hernia repairs were performed between 2013 and 2023. 28 (11.4%) of the hernia repairs were in females, which was not significantly different from the control group (P = 0.45). In Ghana 150 inguinal hernia repairs were performed between 2014 and 2023. 12 (8%) of the hernia repairs were in females. This was not significantly different from the control group (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating the gender equity conducted within the context of humanitarian surgical outreach. Equitable patient selection is a paramount consideration in STSMs, particularly to address gender-related disparities in surgical care.

The status of diversity in the heart transplant workforce.

Cardiac surgery and cardiology consistently have the lowest representation of women and racial minorities among all the specialties. The poor representation of minorities and women in cardiology and cardiac surgery is compounded by the fact that heart failure risk continues to rise in the United States (US) and disproportionately affects non-white patients. Inclusion in academia is imperative in diversifying the workforce and in turn, in improving the care we provide to all of our patients.

Disclosure of medical errors to patients by medical professionals: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Although the disclosure of medical errors is an integral component of medical ethics, it remains inconsistent in practice worldwide. Despite various explanations of why healthcare professionals reveal their mistakes to patients, comprehensive comparisons and evaluations of this topic remain lacking. The objective of this review is to evaluate the experience of medical error disclosure among medical professionals who have been involved in such errors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This work will focus on studies involving medical professionals from various countries who work in hospital settings and have obtained an understanding of and firsthand experience with medical error disclosure. This review will include qualitative studies. Studies published in databases such as PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, OVID, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and Cochrane Library from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2024 will be searched as part of this research. Additionally, OpenGrey will be searched manually to obtain supplementary information. The search will be conducted starting in May 2024 and will include both Chinese-language and English-language literature. The systematic review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence and use the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information online program. Study authenticity will be investigated via the Qualitative Research Authenticity Evaluation Tool provided by the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Centre, and data extraction will be performed via the Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument data extraction tool. The results will be integrated via a pooled integration methodology and evaluated in terms of reliability via the ConQual qualitative systematic evaluation evidence grading tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for the study because the review will be based on pre-existing data available in the literature. The results of this systematic review will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024494360.

"I Just Had to Do What I Had to Do": Characterizing Direct and Indirect Prostate Cancer Treatment Costs for Black Survivors and Their Caregivers.

Introduction. Financial hardship is prevalent among Black prostate cancer survivors and exacerbates health disparities. Characterizing and sharing cost information with patients can facilitate well-informed treatment decision making. Our research explored the direct and indirect costs associated with prostate cancer treatment among Black men and their caregivers. Direct costs included out-of-pocket and insurance-related fees, and indirect costs included the unforeseen costs of care, including patient time, caregiver time, lost wages, and transportation. Methods. We conducted semi-structured interviews with Black prostate cancer survivors and their caregivers to learn about the experience of direct and indirect costs. The interview guide and data analysis were informed by the Measures of Financial Wellbeing framework to gain a better understanding of the material, behavioral, and psychosocial aspects of care-related costs. Guided by a qualitative descriptive approach, we used inductive and deductive coding for our thematic analysis. Results. Eleven prostate cancer survivors with a median age of 68 y (interquartile range [IQR] 62.0-71.5 y) and 11 caregivers with a median age of 64 y (IQR 58.5-70.5 y) participated. We grouped themes into 3 domains and their intersections (i.e., material, behavioral, psychosocial). Participants reported their work and insurance had a significant influence on their finances, treatment costs required rearranging of household budgets, and the weight of indirect costs varied. Ultimately, participants emphasized the significant impact of care costs and the adjustments needed to adapt to them. Discussion. The complexities of material, behavioral, and psychosocial domains of direct and indirect costs of prostate cancer are critical to address when supporting those diagnosed with prostate cancer when making preference-sensitive treatment decisions. The interconnectedness between indirect costs highlights the wide-ranging impact financial well-being has on prostate cancer survivors and caregivers. Highlights: Direct and indirect costs have a wide-ranging impact on the material, behavioral, and psychosocial aspects of financial well-being of Black prostate cancer survivors and their caregivers.These results emphasize the need for sharing cost information to support medical decision making.Future research should focus on the design of cost-sharing interventions that target the complexities of direct and indirect costs collectively, rather than separately.

Barriers to identifying and addressing health-related social needs in cancer care: Patient and patient navigator perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to gain insight into the experiences of patients with cancer and survivors regarding the integration of social needs assessment into their care, while also gathering perspectives from patient navigators on the barriers to obtaining and utilizing social needs information during cancer care, which taken together may influence cancer care policies. By comparing the perspectives of patients and navigators, the study sought to inform best practices for integrating, identifying, and addressing social needs to improve patient experiences and outcomes. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews and self-report surveys involving patients with cancer, providers, and patient navigators or care coordinators, seeking their insights and firsthand experiences related to health-related social needs in cancer care. Interviews were transcribed, separated into memos of main themes based on deductive coding, and further analyzed for new emergent themes using inductive coding. RESULTS: The present analysis focuses solely on the perspectives of 20 patient navigators and 21 patients. Qualitative analyses revealed two overarching themes: Theme 1: Personal and health system-related factors may create barriers for patients to disclose health-related social needs information during cancer care; and Theme 2: When social needs are identified, it is best practice to acknowledge and address social needs through referrals, resources, timely follow-up, and continued care coordination. Key barriers include individual beliefs and attitudes, concerns regarding privacy and sensitivity of questions, uncertainties about the outcomes of disclosing information, and patient-provider relationships and trust. CONCLUSION: Drawing upon the perspectives of patients and patient navigators provided valuable insight into the challenges associated with acquiring information on social needs. Their viewpoints presented feasible solutions to overcome barriers through early acknowledgment of patient needs, timely resource provision, and maintaining consistent follow-up actions. Additionally, it enhanced understanding of the pivotal role patient navigators play in oncology, serving as crucial links between screening for health-related social needs and addressing individual patient requirements. POLICY SUMMARY: The policies and policy improvements our paper seeks to impact include: inequalities in cancer care and health-related social needs of cancer.

Disparities in Health Outcomes in Surgical Oncology.

Cancer health disparities refer to the unequal burden, treatment, and outcomes of cancer care experienced by specific populations. These disparities are systemic and often preventable, impacting diverse populations, including racial and ethnic minorities, medically underserved populations, populations in rural areas, individuals from the LGBT communities, disabled persons, extremes of age, and those living in persistent poverty. Addressing this topic is essential and timely to ensure equitable oncologic outcomes for all populations. Experts in surgical oncology and health disparities have collaborated to produce this seminar issue on Disparities in Surgical Oncology.

Early use of professional interpreters improves trauma outcomes: Results of a single-center retrospective study.

Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience reduced pain assessment and treatment, less comprehensive physical exams, and fewer explanations of the next steps in care. These disparities persist in hospitals with staffed professional interpreters, raising questions about interpreter access and the impact on outcomes. A retrospective review of 1133 trauma activations at a single center Level 1 Trauma Center in 2021-2022 was conducted. Demographic, injury, and outcome data were drawn from the institutional trauma registry, and patient-preferred language was pulled from EMR data. Early interpreter use was defined as documentation of professional interpreter use within 24 h of arrival. LOS and ICU LOS were compared between language groups using Cox regression, and mortality was compared using Fischer's exact test. 1114 patients had data available on initial injury severity and preferred language. Of the 70 LEP patients, 62 (88.6 %) required an interpreter, and 41 of those (66.1 %) had evidence of professional interpreter use within 24 h of arrival. LEP patients who lacked early interpreter use had longer hospital stays than both English proficient (EP) patients (HR 0.59, p < 0.05) and LEP patients with early interpreter use (HR 0.51, p < 0.05) when stratified by ISS and controlling for GCS and patient age. There is no difference in LOS between LEP trauma patients who used an interpreter and EP patients, suggesting that early use of an interpreter may improve the length of stay in LEP trauma patients.

Risk factors for the neurodegenerative dementias in the Western Pacific region.

The Western Pacific Region (WPR) is characterized by a group of socioeconomically, culturally, and geopolitically heterogenous countries and represents a microcosm of the global endemic of neurodegeneration. This review will chart the known risk factors for dementia across the WPR. We explore the intersection between the established risk factors for dementia including the biomedical and lifestyle (cardiovascular and metabolic disease, sleep, hearing loss, depression, alcohol, smoking, traumatic brain injury, genetics) and social determinants (social disadvantage, limited education, systemic racism) as well as incorporate neuroimaging data, where available, to predict disease progression in the WPR. In doing so, we highlight core risk factors for dementia in the WPR, as well as geographical epicentres at heightened risk for dementia, to orient future research towards addressing these disparities.

Health care disparities in complication and mortality rates following surgical management of cauda equina syndrome in New York State.

CONTEXT: While healthcare disparities related to race and ethnicity are well reported for non-emergent conditions, the literature on disparities in outcomes of emergent spinal conditions such as cauda equina syndrome (CES) remains sparse. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate racial disparities in complication, mortality, and readmission rates following surgical intervention for CES. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database demonstrates that among patients surgically treated for CES in New York between 2015 and 2020. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the association of race and outcome variables after controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, length of stay, insurance, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 2,114 patients who underwent lumbar surgery for CES were identified. The study population was comprised of Black patients (177, 8%), White patients (79%, 1680), and Asian patients (257, 12%). Options for surgery included lumbar decompression (821, 38.8%), fusion (746, 35.3%), or both (547, 25.9%). On multivariate analysis, the odds of 30-day mortality were 2.98-fold greater in Black patients than in other patients (P = 0.029). By 180 and 360 days, the odds of mortality were 4.27 and 3.05-fold greater in Black patients than in other patients, respectively (P < 0.001 each). Thirty-day readmissions were 1.87-fold greater in Black patients than others (P = 0.004). No difference in overall complication rate was found between Black patients and all other race groups (P = 0.306). CONCLUSIONS: Black patients surgically treated for CES face significantly higher rates of mortality and readmission than their non-Black counterparts.

Diversity in U.S. Clinical Trials for Head and Neck Cancer: Are We Improving?

BACKGROUND: This study assesses whether national initiatives undertaken to improve diversity in clinical trial enrollment have been successful within head and neck cancer (HNC) trials. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of HNC trials published on clinicaltrials.gov with start dates between 2000 and 2023. Demographic data for 8998 HNC trial enrollees was abstracted and analyzed to investigate potential demographic shifts. RESULTS: In the past 20 years, the percentage of White patients increased 6.1%, Asian patient population decreased 3.1%, and Black patient population increased 0.8%. Compared with previously published SEER data, HNC trials have significantly more White patients, fewer Black patients, and fewer Asian/Native-Hawaiian patients than HNC patients at large. CONCLUSIONS: Despite efforts to increase diversity in HNC clinical trials in the United States, diversity has significantly decreased in the past 10 years. As current approaches are failing to show improvement, novel approaches to improving representation in clinical trials are necessitated.

Vehicles for Consolidation and Expansion of Physician Practices: Private Equity, Medical Services Organizations, and Strategic Partnerships.

As reimbursements decline and the health care sector experiences consolidation, running a small practice is increasingly difficult. The past 15 years has seen a significant rise in practice consolidation, private equity investment, and regional health system affiliation. In a rapidly changing health care landscape, positioning one's practice for the future is challenging. The trade-off between financial stability and loss of control over the business and physician autonomy is often front and center in choosing our strategic partnerships. The long-term effects of these changes in practice dynamics on the quality and cost of care remain unknown but are concerning.

Determinants of brain drain among physicians in Turkey: Findings from a national exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of physicians in Turkey is a highly critical emergency. In fact, physicians' migration to developing or high-income countries, defined as brain drain, threatens the sustainability of the national healthcare system. AIMS: This study explored the driving factors associated with Turkish Physicians' brain drain, including high-economic inflation, social-politics, poor-living, equity, violence, and the desire to practice medical activity abroad. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 1,861 Turkish physicians aged 25 to 65 years old was conducted employing the Brain Drain questionnaire, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), and the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). RESULTS: Significant differences were observed among physicians staying in Turkey versus considering migration to Western countries, regarding their age, gender, marital status, educational level, occupational status, work years, hospital night shifts, income, and cigarette/nargileh smoking habits (all p ⩽ .018). The main reasons for brain drain included transport problems, harassment, low salary, malpractice, bad environment, job insecurity, workload, burnout, treating difficult patients, inadequate postgraduate systems, peer-pressure, health safety concerns, and favoritism in the workplace, as well as stress and depression caused by work overload. In fact, depression, anxiety, stress, fatigue, and burnout varied significantly among the different groups of physicians (all p ⩽ .013). Additionally, key predictors of brain drain were better job opportunities, poor hospital management (in Turkey), job-related stress, dealing with difficult patients, research deficiencies, workload, burnout, transportation issues, short consultation time, low salary, and fatigue. Among the general factors contributing to the brain drain in the Turkish Health System, we identified significant issues related to research deficiencies, compulsory working duties, poor quality of postgraduate, inadequate medical-schools, poor hospital management, and shortage of consultants. CONCLUSION: Physicians' migration is a major global public health concern, leading to substantial risks for healthcare services, especially in Turkey. Many physicians decide to migrate to work in Western countries.

Advancing Cultural Competency and Equity in Surgical Specialties (ACCESS): A Model for a Combined Resident and Faculty DEI Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Committees dedicated to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are not commonplace within departments of surgery. Even rarer are joint initiatives for residents and faculty. We aim to describe the creation of a collaborative committee within a department of surgery to better foster and advance the ideals of DEI. METHODS: An informal needs-assessment was performed amongst the general surgery residency, advanced practice practitioners, and faculty. Other DEI groups throughout the institution were engaged for feedback and interdisciplinary collaboration. RESULTS: Gaps were identified in social support for those from diverse backgrounds, advocacy and recruitment, general DEI education, and research. Three pillars were formed: Social Support, Education and Advocacy, and Research. The overall group and each pillar are co-led by residents and faculty. In less than a year, the group has launched a cultural complications morbidity and mortality curriculum, hosted the first city-wide LGTBQ+ in surgery event, created a safe space for discussion and support, and advocated for recruitment DEI initiatives. So far, the group consists of 48 residents, faculty, advanced practice practitioners, and staff. CONCLUSIONS: An intentional, collaborative effort between residents and faculty in a department of surgery can successfully result in an effective partnership to advance DEI initiatives.

Reduction of Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Healthcare Utilization and Socioeconomic Disparities: Longitudinal Benefits of Quality Improvement.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in emergency department (ED) utilization after gastrostomy (G-) tube placement were previously demonstrated at our children's hospital. We aimed to reduce postoperative G-tube dislodgements and ED visits with a particular focus on socially vulnerable children. METHODS: Our improvement team implemented a G-tube care bundle (6/2018-9/2019) targeting caregiver preparedness and standardizing care in the pre-, intra-, and post-operative periods. Patients who had G tubes placed between 1/2011-8/2022 were categorized to either pre- or post-intervention groups. Primary outcomes were tracked prospectively. National area deprivation index (ADI) was assigned retrospectively and employed to evaluate social risk. Univariate comparisons were made between pre- and post-intervention groups, and between High ADI (≥80) and Low ADI (<80) subgroups in both pre- and post- intervention periods. We used statistical process control methods to further analyze change over time. RESULTS: 396 children were included (188 pre-intervention, 208 post-intervention). The post-intervention cohort demonstrated a lower rate of outpatient dislodgement at 90 days following G-tube placement (21.3 % vs 10.1 %, p = 0.002) and fewer G-tube-related ED visits per G-tube placed within one year of placement (mean 0.8 visits vs 0.6 visits, p = 0.012). Pre-intervention, children from high ADI neighborhoods had significantly greater healthcare utilization compared to those from lower ADI neighborhoods. Post-intervention, previously statistically significant disparities were no longer present. Outpatient G-tube dislodgements within 90 days were particularly mitigated. CONCLUSIONS: A longstanding quality improvement initiative has led to sustained reductions in overall G-tube-related health care utilization. Care standardization and improvement may mitigate outcome disparities related to socioeconomic advantage. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative Study and Prospective Quality Improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Understanding the Representation of Asians and Asian Americans Within Academic Otolaryngology Leadership.

OBJECTIVE: Elucidate the representation of Asian and Asian Americans in academic otolaryngology and the influence of race on promotion and leadership opportunities. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Administrative Management Online User System. SETTING: Full-time otolaryngology faculty from all US medical schools from 2020 to 2023. METHODS: Faculty demographics, tenure, and rank were collected. Descriptive statistics, Fischer's exact test, Rank Equity Index (REI), and multivariable logistic and ordinal regressions were used to characterize our cohort and assess the impact of race on academic advancement and leadership, defined as promotion to tenure or full professorship. RESULTS: Asians comprised 20.53% of 9056 faculty over 4 years. Asians were most likely to hold tenure-eligible positions (n = 600, 30.74%) but were significantly less likely than non-Asians to be tenured (43.00% vs 48.65%, P = .015). Asians were slightly above parity in promotion from assistant to associate professor (REI = 1.09) but below parity in promotion from associate professor to professor (REI = 0.78). Relative to whites, Hispanics, and African Americans, Asians reported the lowest associate/professor and assistant/professor REIs. On multivariable regressions, Asian race was not associated with decreased odds of tenure-eligible positions but was associated with decreased odds of tenure (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.64-0.93]) and rank promotion (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = [0.74-0.90]). CONCLUSION: Despite strong overall representation in otolaryngology, Asians are less likely to receive promotion, tenure, or full professorship relative to other racial groups. Future efforts should emphasize equitable advancement opportunities to ensure a diverse otolaryngology leadership.

Correlation of Pediatric Surgical Infrastructure With Clinical and Economic Outcomes: A Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: A significant burden of unmet pediatric surgical disease exists in low- and middle-income countries. We sought to assess the associations between the installation of a pediatric operating room (OR) and clinical and economic outcomes for families with children in Ethiopia. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of children who underwent elective surgery in a tertiary-level Ethiopian public hospital, comparing patient outcomes before and after OR installation in August 2019. Clinical data were collected via chart review, and an inpatient economic survey was administered to patient caregivers. Interrupted time series analysis investigated trends in surgical volume over time. The relative economic benefit was determined by comparing the patients' household income to the monetary health benefit gained using the value of statistical life method. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and ninety-six patients were included from August 2018 to July 2022. Surgery averted 20,541 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) cumulatively or 17 DALYs per patient. Monthly case volume and DALYs averted significantly increased postinstallation. The median annual household income of the economic survey responders (n = 339) was $1337 (IQR 669-2592). 27.7% (n = 94/339) lived in extreme poverty, and 41.3% (n = 140/339) experienced catastrophic healthcare expenditure. Net monetary health benefit was $29.3 million or $26,646 per patient. The ratio of net monetary health benefit to household annual income was 60:1. CONCLUSIONS: Installing a pediatric OR in a public Ethiopian hospital ensures increased access to surgery for those most impoverished in Ethiopia and improves equitable access to surgical care. Greater investment in expanding pediatric surgical infrastructure can help address global inequities in child health.

Mind the gap in kidney care: translating what we know into what we do / Atenção às lacunas no cuidado renal: traduzindo o que sabemos em ações

Abstract Historically, it takes an average of 17 years for new treatments to move from clinical evidence to daily practice. Given the highly effective treatments now available to prevent or delay kidney disease onset and progression, this is far too long. Now is the time to narrow the gap between what we know and what we do. Clear guidelines exist for the prevention and management of common risk factors for kidney disease, such as hypertension and diabetes, but only a fraction of people with these conditions are diagnosed worldwide, and even fewer are treated to target. Similarly, the vast majority of people living with kidney disease are unaware of their condition, because it is often silent in the early stages. Even among patients who have been diagnosed, many do not receive appropriate treatment for kidney disease. Considering the serious consequences of kidney disease progression, kidney failure, or death, it is imperative that treatments are initiated early and appropriately. Opportunities to diagnose and treat kidney disease early must be maximized beginning at the primary care level. Many systematic barriers exist, ranging from the patient to the clinician to the health systems to societal factors. To preserve and improve kidney health for everyone everywhere, each of these barriers must be acknowledged so that sustainable solutions are developed and implemented without further delay.

Resumo Historicamente, são necessários, em média, 17 anos para que novos tratamentos passem da evidência clínica para a prática diária. Considerando os tratamentos altamente eficazes disponíveis atualmente para prevenir ou retardar o início e a progressão da doença renal, esse período é demasiadamente longo. Agora é o momento de reduzir a lacuna entre o que sabemos e aquilo que fazemos. Existem diretrizes claras para a prevenção e o manejo dos fatores de risco comuns para doenças renais, como hipertensão e diabetes, mas apenas uma fração das pessoas com essas condições é diagnosticada mundialmente, e um número ainda menor recebe tratamento adequado. Da mesma forma, a grande maioria das pessoas que sofrem de doença renal não têm conhecimento de sua condição, pois ela costuma ser silenciosa nos estágios iniciais. Mesmo entre pacientes que foram diagnosticados, muitos não recebem tratamento adequado para a doença renal. Levando em consideração as graves consequências da progressão da doença renal, insuficiência renal ou óbito, é imperativo que os tratamentos sejam iniciados precocemente e de maneira adequada. As oportunidades para diagnosticar e tratar precocemente a doença renal devem ser maximizadas, começando no nível da atenção primária. Existem muitas barreiras sistemáticas, que vão desde o paciente até o médico, passando pelos sistemas de saúde e por fatores sociais. Para preservar e melhorar a saúde renal para todos em qualquer lugar, cada uma dessas barreiras deve ser reconhecida para que soluções sustentáveis sejam desenvolvidas e implementadas sem mais demora.

Reflexões sobre o caráter ambivalente da judicialização na saúde: Desafio para garantia da integralidade e equidade no SUS / Reflections on the ambivalent nature of judicialization in health: Challenge to guarantee comprehensiveness and equity in the SUS / Reflexiones sobre el carácter ambivalente de la judicialización en salud: Desafío para garantizar integralidad y equidad em el SUS

No Brasil, o direito à saúde passou a ser universal e integral conforme previsão constitucional. No entanto, a via judicial passou a ser utilizada para garantia do acesso a tratamentos de saúde frente à necessidade da população, sem o emprego de muito rigor técnico. Objetivo: revisar a literatura sobre os pontos positivos e negativos encontrados na judicialização da saúde. Metodologia: realizou-se um levantamento na Base de Dados da Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, com estudos entre 2010 e 2021. Foram encontrados 59 artigos, aplicando os critérios de inclusão para esse estudo, selecionamos 39 para análise. Após aprofundada leitura dos artigos, foram eleitos os temas organizados nas seguintes categorias: medicamentos e tratamentos padronizados pelo Sistema Único de Saúde; medicamentos e tratamentos não padronizados pelo Sistema Único de Saúde; e interferência das indústrias farmacêuticas e diálogos interinstitucionais. Resultados: A maioria dos artigos identificaram pontos positivos e negativos da judicialização da saúde ou mencionaram a existência da contradição que versa esse assunto. Os estudos apontaram que parte da judicialização decorre de falhas da própria gestão. Percebe-se, assim, um conflito presente na dicotomia entre o garantido e a estruturação e capacidade do sistema para a sua realização. Conclusão: Os entes envolvidos na judicialização da saúde devem dialogar entre si, no intuito de compreender o fenômeno e enfrentar os desafios. É necessário reconhecer as demandas judiciais como fonte provocadora para a melhoria da gestão do direito à saúde efetivamente Sistema Único de Saúde, visando sempre ao melhor atendimento aos usuários, promovendo assim a equidade com eficiência no gasto de dinheiro público.

In Brazil, the right to health became universal and comprehensive, as per the constitutional provision. However, the judicial route began to be used to guarantee access to health treatments in response to the population's needs, without the use of much technical rigor. Objective: to review the literature on the positive and negative points found in the Judicialization of health. Methodology: a survey was carried out in the Virtual Health Library Database, with studies between 2010 and 2021. 59 articles were found, applying the inclusion criteria for this study, we selected 39 for analysis. After in-depth reading of the articles, themes organized into the following categories were chosen: medicines and treatments standardized by the SUS; medicines and treatments not standardized by the SUS; and interference from pharmaceutical industries and interinstitutional dialogues. Results: Most articles identified positive and negative points of the Judicialization of health or mentioned the existence of the contradiction regarding this subject. The studies showed that part of the Judicialization results from failures in the management itself. Therefore, a conflict can be seen in the dichotomy between the right to health effectively guaranteed and the structure and capacity of the system to achieve it. Conclusion: The entities involved in the Judicialization of health must dialogue with each other, in order to understand the phenomenon and face the challenges. It is necessary to recognize legal demands as a provocative source for improving SUS management, always aiming to provide better service to users, thus promoting equity and efficiency in spending public money.

En Brasil, el derecho a la salud pasó a ser universal e integral, según disposición constitucional. Sin embargo, se empezó a utilizar la vía judicial para garantizar el acceso a tratamientos de salud que respondieran a las necesidades de la población, sin el uso de mucho rigor técnico. Objetivo: revisar la literatura sobre los puntos positivos y negativos encontrados en la Judicialización de la salud. Metodología: se realizó una encuesta en la Base de Datos de la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud, con estudios entre 2010 y 2021. Se encontraron 59 artículos, aplicando los criterios de inclusión de este estudio, se seleccionaron 39 para el análisis. Después de la lectura en profundidad de los artículos, se eligieron temas organizados en las siguientes categorías: medicamentos y tratamientos estandarizados por el SUS; medicamentos y tratamientos no estandarizados por el SUS; y la interferencia de las industrias farmacéuticas y los diálogos interinstitucionales. Resultados: La mayoría de los artículos identificaron puntos positivos y negativos de la Judicialización de la salud o mencionaron la existencia de la contradicción respecto a este tema. Los estudios demostraron que parte de la Judicialización resulta de fallas en la propia gestión. Por lo tanto, se puede ver un conflicto en la dicotomía entre el derecho a la salud efectivamente garantizado y la estructura y capacidad del sistema para lograrlo. Conclusión: Las entidades involucradas en la Judicialización de la salud deben dialogar entre sí, para comprender el fenómeno y afrontar los desafíos. Es necesario reconocer las demandas legales como una fuente de provocación para mejorar la gestión del SUS, siempre con el objetivo de brindar un mejor servicio a los usuarios, promoviendo así la equidad y la eficiencia en el gasto del dinero público.