Maintenance Therapy Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

High-risk acute myeloid leukemia has been associated with a poor outcome. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents the only curative option for eligible patients. Relapse after HSCT is a dramatic event with poor chances of survival. With the aim of reducing the rate of post-HSCT relapse, maintenance treatment has been investigated in this setting. Results from clinical trials suggest an advantage in the use of a maintenance strategy; however, standardized guidelines are not yet available due to the lack of prospective clinical trials. In this review, we have reported the most important strategies adopted as post-HSCT maintenance, highlighting their efficacy, but the current research also opens questions.

N-803, an IL-15 Superagonist Complex as Maintenance Therapy After Allogeneic Donor Stem Cell Transplant for Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome; A Phase 2 Trial.

Maintenance therapy may improve natural killer (NK) cell surveillance after allogeneic donor hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for myeloid malignancies and represents a potential approach to improve cure rates. Interleukin-15 (IL-15) enhances lymphocyte proliferation and antitumor activity. In a prior Phase 1 study of an IL-15 superagonist (N-803) in patients with AML who relapsed after HCT, we observed in vivo expansion of NK cells and antitumor responses. The primary objective of this Phase 2 trial was to determine if post-transplant N-803 could reduce relapse. We administered N-803 (n = 20) (dosed 6 mcg/kg subcutaneously [SQ] at day 60 after HCT to patients with myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS] or acute myeloid leukemia [AML] who were in complete remission [CR]). N-803 treatment was planned weekly, biweekly or every 4 weeks in 2 sequential cohorts. The most common adverse events after administration were self-limited injection sites skin rashes (n = 20). One week after an N-803 dose, we observed enhanced NK cell proliferation and improved antitumor cytotoxicity without inducing immune exhaustion. Five patients who developed acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) after N-803 responded promptly to steroids and 4 patients developed chronic GVHD. Patients receiving >4 doses of N-803 had a 3-fold decrease in relapse at two years (P = .06). These findings support the safety, immune activation, and potential efficacy of N-803 to prevent relapse of AML/MDS after HSCT.

Maintenance therapy promotes profound organ and haematologic response in light-chain amyloidosis patients not undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on maintenance therapy following frontline induction is sparse in primary light-chain amyloidosis (AL), especially for those who do not undergo autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). METHODS: We enrolled primary AL patients who achieved at least haematologic very good partial response (VGPR) by the 4th month at the frontline from December 2008 to June 2023 at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Those who followed maintenance therapy were identified as the maintenance group (n = 44), whereas those entering the observational phase were classified as the observational group (n = 24). RESULTS: After 7.2(interquartile range, 4.7-18.6) months of maintenance therapy, 9(20.5%), 14(31.8%) and 5 (11.4%) patients achieved improvement in haematologic, cardiac and renal response respectively. Five (11.4%) patients had minimal residual disease (MRD) response conversion from positive to negative based on maintenance therapy. In the observation group, none of the patients had haematologic response improvement, with 3(12.5%) and 1(4.2%) patient showing cardiac and renal response improvement during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study identified the clinical benefits of maintenance therapy in patients with AL who did not undergo ASCT in real-world practice.

Maintenance Therapy Post-Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with T-Cell Lymphomas.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Given the poor outcomes for peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), stem cell transplant (SCT) remains an important therapeutic approach. Post-SCT relapse is common and maintenance therapy post-SCT is increasingly being utilized. Here we review the use of post-SCT maintenance therapy for PTCL patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Maintenance therapy is increasingly utilized to decrease post-SCT relapse and improve outcomes in PTCL. Ongoing and completed post-SCT maintenance trials utilizing agents such as romidepsin, brentuximab vedotin, duvelisib, and pembrolizumab have shown efficacy in decreasing relapse. Further, additional agents with efficacy in PTCL have emerged that may inform future maintenance approaches. Maintenance therapy is a promising approach to maintain response after SCT in PTCL. While several trials are ongoing to evaluate maintenance therapy in PTCL, current data suggests this may be an effective method to decrease post-SCT relapse.

Impact of PARP inhibitors on progression-free survival in platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors such as olaparib and niraparib have shown promise in extending progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent (PSR) epithelial ovarian cancer. In this retrospective study, we aimed to present our own data on the effect of PARP inhibitors on PFS in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: 82 patients diagnosed with PSR epithelial ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer between May 2017 and September 2023 were initially enrolled from our hospital. However, 16 patients had prior exposure to PARP inhibitors during primary treatment, and 11 were lost to follow-up. Consequently, the study focused on 55 eligible patients. PFS was compared between patients receiving PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy and those who did not. RESULTS: Among the 55 patients with PSR epithelial ovarian cancer, 18 received olaparib as maintenance therapy, 19 received niraparib, and 18 opted for observation. PARP inhibitor therapy significantly extended PFS (mean 24.0 months) compared to observation (mean 9.0 months, p = 0.0005), regardless of BRCA mutation status (HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.08-0.50). Subgroup analysis showed no statistical difference between olaparib and niraparib. Additionally, there was no PFS difference based on BRCA mutation status within both PARP inhibitor groups. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective study demonstrates that PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy, including olaparib and niraparib, significantly prolongs PFS in patients with PSR epithelial ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer, These findings support the broad utilization of PARP inhibitors as a standard maintenance therapy for PSR epithelial ovarian cancer irrespective of BRCA mutation status.

PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy, including olaparib and niraparib, significantly prolongs PFS in patients with PSR epithelial ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer, irrespective of BRCA mutation status. PARP inhibitors can be recommended as a standard maintenance therapy for PSR epithelial ovarian cancer.

A phase 2, multicenter, clinical trial of CPX-351 in older patients with secondary or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: PETHEMA-LAMVYX.

BACKGROUND: LAMVYX was a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial designed to validate the safety and efficacy of CPX-351 in patients aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed, secondary acute myeloid leukemia and to generate evidence on key issues not addressed in the preceding regulatory pivotal trial. METHODS: The primary end point of the study was the complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate after induction. Eligible patients were recommended to undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after the first consolidation cycle. Alternatively, patients could undergo up to six maintenance cycles with CPX-351. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (49%; 95% exact confidence interval [CI], 37%-62%) patients achieved a CR/CRi after one or two cycles of induction, with a measurable residual disease negativity rate of 67% as assessed by centralized, multiparameter flow cytometry. Among patients who had serial next-generation sequencing analyses available, clearance of somatic mutations that were present at diagnosis was achieved in 7 (35%). The median follow-up among survivors was 16.8 months (range, 8.7-24.3 months). The median event-free survival was 3.0 months (95% CI, 1.4-7.3 months), and the median overall survival was 7.4 months (95% CI, 3.7-12.7 months). In landmark analyses at day +100 from diagnosis, the 1-year overall and event-free survival rate among patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was 70% (95% CI, 47%-100%) and 70% (95% CI, 47%-100%), respectively. The corresponding values were 89% (95% CI, 71%-100%) and 44% (95% CI, 21%-92%), respectively, for patients who entered the maintenance phase. No significant longitudinal changes were observed in severity index or quality-of-life visual analog scale scores. CONCLUSIONS: The current data provide novel insights that might inform the clinical positioning and optimal use of CPX-351, complementing previous results (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04230239).

Real-world trends in the use of maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer across the United States from 2017 to 2021.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed real-world trends in the use of maintenance therapy [MT] (i.e., polyADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and/or bevacizumab following platinum-based chemotherapy), among U.S. patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: Using Medicare and commercial administrative health claims data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database, we identified patients who had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer between January 1, 2010, and March 31, 2021, and received platinum-based chemotherapy and MT. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate associations between demographic and clinical characteristics and MT use. RESULTS: Our study included 6339 patients, with a median age of 70 years. The majority were White (70.1 %), Medicare-insured (71.9 %), and were treated in the South (42.5 %). Of the 31.5 % who received MT, 18.1 % received bevacizumab alone, 10.2 % PARPi alone, and 3.3 % both. After adjusting for insurance type, PARPi and bevacizumab use increased significantly from 2017 to 2020. Patients with a high Elixhauser comorbidity index were more likely to receive MT than were patients with a low index [OR (95 % CI): 1.46 (1.28-1.67), p < 0.0001]. PARPi use was significantly associated with treatment in the South [1.42 (1.10-1.83), p = 0.01]. Compared to patients who received neither agents, those who received bevacizumab, alone or in combination with PARPi, had a higher risk of death [HR = 2.02 (95 % CI: 1.70-2.28, p < 0.0001) and 1.66 (1.24-2.23), p = 0.001, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with ovarian cancer are not utilizing maintenance therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy. Age, comorbidity status, and geographic region of treatment were associated with MT use. Understanding the factors and real-world outcomes associated with MT use is important to support patients in making value concordant and informed decisions.

Healthcare Utilization and Costs Among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Oral Azacitidine Maintenance Therapy Versus No Maintenance: A US Claims Database Study.

INTRODUCTION: The substantial economic burden of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) could be reduced with post-remission maintenance therapies that delay relapse. Real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) data and costs among patients with AML receiving oral azacitidine (Oral-AZA) maintenance therapy or no maintenance are not well understood. We characterize HCRU and costs among these patients in clinical practice in the USA. METHODS: Data from IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus (January 1, 2016-June 30, 2022) were used. Patients ≥ 18 years who were newly diagnosed with AML, received first-line systemic induction therapy, and attained disease remission were eligible. Patients receiving Oral-AZA maintenance and those receiving no maintenance ("watch and wait" [W&W]) were matched 1:3 on baseline characteristics using propensity score matching (PSM) and followed until hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or end of continuous insurance enrollment, whichever occurred first. Outcomes included treatment patterns, inpatient and outpatient visits, and costs. RESULTS: After PSM, the Oral-AZA cohort included 43 patients and the W&W cohort 129. Of the 43 patients receiving Oral-AZA, 88.4% started at the recommended dose of 300 mg and 11.6% at 200 mg. The Oral-AZA cohort had significantly (p = 0.0025) longer median (95% CI) time to relapse from the index maintenance date (median not reached [NR; 9.0 months-NR] vs 3.3 months [0.8 months-NR]), and fewer per person per month (PPPM) hospitalizations (0.23 vs 0.61; p = 0.0005) and overall outpatient visits (5.77 vs 7.58; p = 0.0391) than the W&W cohort. Despite higher AML drug costs PPPM in the Oral-AZA cohort ($16,401 vs $10,651 for W&W), total healthcare costs PPPM were lower ($25,786 vs $38,530 for W&W; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with Oral-AZA maintenance in clinical practice had prolonged remission and lower HCRU and costs than patients receiving no maintenance therapy. These findings underscore the clinical and economic value of Oral-AZA in clinical practice.

[Analysis of the prognostic factors in primary plasma cell leukemia in the era of novel agents].

Objective: To explore the prognostic factors of primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) in the era of novel agents. Methods: The clinical data of 66 patients with pPCL treated at the Department of Haematology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University from 2011 to 2022 were retrospectively collected to analyze their prognostic factors. Results: Among the 66 patients with pPCL, the median age was 59 (range: 29-79) years. The median overall survival (OS) duration was 19.0 (95% CI 10.4-27.6) months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) duration was 11.0 (95% CI 6.5-15.6) months. The median OS and PFS were significantly longer in patients with the best post-treatment response of very good partial remission (VGPR) or better than in patients with a response of partial remission (PR) or worse (median OS: 33.0 months vs 6.0 months, P<0.001; median PFS: 16.0 months vs 3.0 months, P<0.001). OS was significantly longer in patients who underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation than in those who did not undergo transplantation (49.0 months vs 6.0 months, P=0.002), and there was a trend toward a longer PFS in patients who underwent transplantation than in those who did not undergo transplantation (19.0 months vs 8.0 months, P=0.299). The median OS and PFS were significantly longer in patients who received maintenance therapy than in those who did not receive maintenance therapy (median OS: 56.0 months vs 4.0 months, P<0.001; median PFS: 20.0 months vs 2.0 months, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that hypercalcemia was an independent risk factor (HR=3.204, 95% CI 1.068-9.610, P=0.038) for patients with pPCL, while receiving maintenance therapy (HR=0.075, 95% CI 0.022-0.253, P<0.001) and post-treatment response of VGPR or better (HR=0.175, 95% CI 0.048-0.638, P=0.008) were independent protective factors for patients with pPCL. Conclusions: In the era of novel agents, hypercalcemia, receiving maintenance therapy, and post-treatment response of VGPR or better are independent prognostic factors for pPCL.

Chidamide maintenance therapy after allo-HSCT in SET-NUP214 fusion positive T-ALL patients: A report of two cases.

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is a highly invasive hematological malignancy originated from T-lineage progenitor cells. The clonal proliferation and aggregation of primordial cells in bone marrow inhibit normal hematopoietic function, resulting in a series of hematocytopenia and infiltration symptoms. SET-NUP214 fusion is a recurrent event that is common in adult male T-ALL patients. It originates from chromosome del(9)(q34.11; q34.13) or t(9; 9)(q34; q34). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can significantly improve the survival rate of these patients. Due to the poor prognosis of patients and high relapse rate after remission, more effective strategies need to be proposed to improve prognosis and prevent relapse. Chidamide is a novel oral benzamide histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) that can exert anti-tumor effects through multiple mechanisms. Here we report chidamide maintenance therapy after allo-HSCT in patients with SET-NUP214 fusion positive T-ALL. Both patients improved effectively during follow-up, confirming the efficacy of chidamide in improving the condition of these patients and may provide valuable clinical information for the treatment of this rare and understudied disease.

Analysis toolkit for evaluation of drug titration practice in acute lymphoblastic leukemia maintenance.

Objective: During the 2-year maintenance treatment phase (MT) of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), personalized patient-specified titration of oral antimetabolite drug doses is required to ensure maximum tolerated systemic drug exposure. Drug titration is difficult to implement in practice and insufficient systemic drug exposure resulting from inadequate dose titration increases risk of ALL relapse. Materials and Methods: We developed an open-source R-based analytical toolkit, including the allMT R package and an interactive web-based R Shiny VIATAMIN application, to evaluate antimetabolite drug titration during MT. Results: Evaluation is initiated with basic visualization analysis of drug titration, in both individual patients and patient cohorts. Observations are supplemented with descriptive analyses of hematological toxicity frequency and prescriber compliance rates with protocol drug titration rules. In individual patients, visual and quantitative analyses indicate recurring potentially correctable suboptimal drug titration patterns. In patient cohorts, the toolkit enables evaluation of the impact of interventions to optimize MT drug titration. Discussion: Incorporation of the toolkit in a forthcoming clinical decision support system for MT would enable real-time examination and course correction of drug titration practice. Conclusion: Future versions will be enhanced to include other variables that influence drug titration practice, including clinical toxicity data and later, pharmacological markers of antimetabolite, adherence, and drug activity.

Alectinib maintenance therapy following cord blood transplantation for relapsed pediatric anaplastic large cell lymphoma with central nervous system involvement.

Pediatric ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma is a rare subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and approximately 30% of patients relapse following treatment with conventional chemotherapy. Alectinib monotherapy has demonstrated excellent activity in relapsed and refractory ALCL, but its role as a maintenance therapy after hematopoietic cell transplantation is unclear. We experienced a relapse case of pediatric ALK-positive ALCL with central nervous system involvement treated with alectinib maintenance therapy following cord blood transplantation. The patient has maintained complete remission for more than 3 years after transplantation. There were no remarkable adverse effects that led to discontinuation of alectinib.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer achieving SD post first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy.

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly in patients who exhibit stable disease (SD) following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib, a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as maintenance therapy in this patient cohort. This retrospective, single-center study enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC who showed SD after receiving a combination of first-line chemo-immunotherapy for 4 cycles, then add anlotinib to subsequent standard maintenance therapy, continuing treatment until disease progression or the occurrence of intolerable toxic side effects. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (P FS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profile. A total of 52 patients were enrolled, the median P FS and OS was 5.0m and 10.0m, respectively. The ORR and DCR was 28.85% and 67.31%. subgroup analysis indicated that its efficacy correlate with certain Adverse Effects (AEs, such as hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome). Further mechanistic analysis suggests that this regimen may likely reduce immune suppression by depleting Tregs, thereby further activating the immune system to exert synergistic anti-tumor effects. Besides promising efficacy, the toxicity can be tolerated. Anlotinib demonstrates promising efficacy as a maintenance therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC who have achieved SD following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. The manageable safety profile and the observed extension in P FS and OS suggest that Anlotinib could be a valuable therapeutic option for this challenging patient population. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and to optimize patient selection and management strategies.

Effectiveness and safety of anlotinib plus anti-programmed cell death 1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world study.

Background: Currently, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy followed by maintenance therapy with immune monotherapy is the preferred first-line treatment option for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but with limited overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) benefits. The combination of anti-angiogenic drugs with immunotherapy has shown encouraging anti-tumor activity and tolerability, with some degree of overcoming immune resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib plus anti-programmed cell death 1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in ES-SCLC. Methods: Between June 2020 and December 2021, 12 patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. All patients without disease progression after 4-6 cycles of first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies received anlotinib (12 mg oral/day, days 1-14, followed by 1 week off, every 3 weeks per cycle) plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies as maintenance therapy. Several patients underwent chest radiotherapy (intensity-modulated radiotherapy using a 6 MV X-ray) without disease progression before maintenance therapy. The effectiveness and safety of anlotinib plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in ES-SCLC were evaluated. Results: The median follow-up time was 31.1 months. During first-line treatment (including maintenance therapy), one patient achieved a complete response, eight patients achieved a partial response (PR), and three patients had stable disease, with an objective response rate of 75.0% and a disease control rate of 100.0%. During maintenance therapy with anlotinib plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, 50.0% of patients achieved further lesion remission on the basis of the prior initial treatment, of which one patient achieved a PR. The median PFS was 13.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.2-15.6] months, and the median OS was 19.5 (95% CI: 14.5-24.5) months. Treatment-related any grade and grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 100.0% and 58.3% of patients, respectively. No life-threatening AEs were observed. Grade 3-4 AEs included leukocytopenia (58.3%, 7/12), thrombocytopenia (33.3%, 4/12), nausea (33.3%, 4/12), anemia (16.7%, 2/12), and fatigue (8.3%, 1/12). All AEs during maintenance therapy were tolerated and were regarded as grade 1-2, with the majority being fatigue, nausea, rash, and hemoptysis. Conclusions: The combination of anlotinib with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies demonstrated encouraging effectiveness and safety in treating patients with ES-SCLC, suggesting that it may be a preferred option for maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy.

Factors associated with an inconclusive result from commercial homologous recombination deficiency testing in ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing is used to determine the appropriateness of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and no germline/somatic BRCA1/2 alterations. Myriad MyChoice CDx reports a genomic instability score (GIS) to quantify the level of HRD, with a positive score defined as ≥42. The authors sought to define factors associated with obtaining an inconclusive HRD test result. METHODS: GIS was retrieved for patients at their institution with epithelial ovarian cancer without germline/somatic BRCA1/2 deleterious alterations who underwent HRD testing from April 2020-August 2023. Clinical data were abstracted from the medical record. RESULTS: Of 477 HRD test results identified, 57 (12%) were inconclusive. High-grade serous ovarian cancers had higher GIS than other histologic types (median 29 vs. 21, p < .001). Most HRD cases were of high-grade serous histology; no cases with clear cell or endometrioid histology were HRD-positive. On univariate analysis, interval versus primary cytoreductive surgery, other specimen sources versus surgical specimens, and chemotherapy exposure were risk factors for inconclusive HRD testing. On multivariable analysis, chemotherapy exposure, and tissue source were associated with an inconclusive test result, with surgical specimens more likely to yield a conclusive result than other sources (biopsy, cytology, other). Age, stage, self-reported race, and histology were not associated with an inconclusive result. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical tissue was more likely to yield a conclusive HRD test result versus other sources of epithelial ovarian cancer tissue acquisition. When feasible, laparoscopic biopsy before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may increase the likelihood of obtaining interpretable HRD test results.

Patient Characteristics Associated with Time to Next Treatment in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Treated with Niraparib: The PRED1CT Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: Niraparib first-line maintenance (1LM) therapy has demonstrated clinical benefit for patients with ovarian cancer (OC) in clinical trial and real-world settings, but data on factors associated with real-world patient outcomes remain limited. This analysis identified patient characteristics associated with time to next treatment (TTNT), a proxy for real-world progression-free survival, in patients with OC treated with 1LM niraparib monotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used a USA nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database and included adult patients diagnosed with OC who initiated 1LM niraparib monotherapy after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were followed until the earliest occurrence of last clinical activity, death, or end of study period. TTNT was measured from 1LM niraparib initiation to the start of second-line treatment or death. Cox proportional hazards models assessed univariable and multivariable associations between baseline characteristics and TTNT. RESULTS: Of 7872 patients diagnosed with OC, 526 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this analysis. Median (IQR) duration of follow-up was 14.1 (7.4-23.6) months. In univariable analyses, age, BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, socioeconomic status, stage at initial diagnosis, cytoreductive surgery type, and residual disease status were significantly associated with observed TTNT and were introduced into the multivariable model with other clinically relevant variables. In the multivariable analysis, BRCA/HRD status, cytoreductive surgery type, and residual disease status were significantly associated with observed TTNT after covariate adjustment. Conversely, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, disease stage, niraparib starting dose status, and first-line bevacizumab use were not associated with observed TTNT. CONCLUSION: This real-world, retrospective, observational analysis offers valuable insights on prognostic factors associated with TTNT in patients with OC treated with 1LM niraparib monotherapy after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Future studies are needed to examine how additional patient characteristics associated with clinical outcomes may guide treatment decisions and improve outcomes.

Dermatology-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with fluorouracil and folinic acid with or without panitumumab (Pmab) maintenance after FOLFOX + Pmab induction: a prespecified secondary analysis of the phase II randomized PanaMa (AIO KRK 0212) trial.

BACKGROUND: The key endpoints for the assessment of the effect of maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are survival and quality-of-life outcomes. We aimed to compare dermatology-related quality of life (DRQOL) in patients with RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC treated with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) + panitumumab (Pmab) versus FU/FA alone as maintenance therapy after folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin + Pmab induction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The phase II randomized PanaMa (AIO KRK 0212; NCT01991873) trial included 387 patients at 70 community/academic sites in Germany. For this prespecified secondary analysis, DRQOL outcomes were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (FACT-EGFRI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Skindex-16 questionnaires at every second cycle of therapy until disease progression/death. RESULTS: At least one DRQOL questionnaire was completed by a total of 310/377 (82%) patients who received induction therapy, and by 216/248 (87%) patients who were randomized and received maintenance therapy. Patients who experienced skin toxicity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) during induction therapy had significantly worse DRQOL according to all three measures, compared to those who did not [i.e. Skindex-16, mean difference at cycle 2 -12.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) -20.01 to -5.73; P < 0.001]. During maintenance therapy, significantly improved recovery was observed in all DRQOL measures for patients receiving FU/FA, compared to those receiving additional Pmab (i.e. Skindex-16, mean difference at cycle 6 -16.53; 95% CI -22.68 to -10.38; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this secondary analysis of a phase II randomized clinical trial, patient-reported DRQOL outcomes correlated with skin toxicity according to NCI-CTCAE during induction therapy. Maintenance therapy with FU/FA + Pmab was associated with deteriorated DRQOL versus FU/FA alone in patients with RAS wt mCRC.

Tolerability of the niraparib individualized starting dose in the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy.

PURPOSE: To explore safety and tolerability parameters for the niraparib individualized starting dose (ISD) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to platinum-based chemotherapy who participated in the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial (NCT02655016). METHODS: The PRIMA protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD based on baseline body weight/platelet count. In this ad hoc analysis, the timing, duration, and resolution of the first occurrence of common any-grade hematologic (thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia) and nonhematologic (nausea, asthenia/fatigue, constipation, insomnia, hypertension) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated by treatment arm in the ISD safety population (data cutoff, November 17, 2021; median follow-up, 3.5 years). RESULTS: Of 733 randomized patients, 255 were enrolled after the ISD protocol amendment and received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment (niraparib, 169; placebo, 86). In the niraparib arm, median times to first events were 22.0-35.0 days for hematologic TEAEs and 7.0-56.0 days for nonhematologic TEAEs. First events resolved in ≥ 89.8% of patients for hematologic TEAEs; for nonhematologic TEAEs, resolution rates ranged from 55.3% (insomnia) to 86.0% (nausea). Median durations of first hematologic TEAEs were ≤ 16.0 days, but for first nonhematologic TEAEs ranged from 18.0 days (nausea) to 134.0 days (insomnia). CONCLUSION: The niraparib ISD was generally well tolerated and TEAEs were manageable. Common hematologic and nonhematologic TEAEs occurred early and first events of hematologic TEAEs had a short duration (≈ 2 weeks) and a high resolution rate. These findings support close monitoring immediately following niraparib initiation and may help inform patient expectations for niraparib safety.

Maintenance with mirvetuximab soravtansine plus bevacizumab vs bevacizumab in FRα-high platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

At first recurrence, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC) is frequently treated with platinum-based chemotherapy doublets plus bevacizumab, then single-agent bevacizumab. Most patients' disease progresses within a year after chemotherapy, emphasizing the need for novel strategies. Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV), an antibody-drug conjugate, comprises a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody and tubulin-targeting payload (maytansinoid DM4). In FRα-high PSOC, MIRV plus bevacizumab previously showed promising efficacy (objective response rate, 69% [95% CI: 41-89]; median progression-free survival, 13.3 months [95% CI: 8.3-18.3]; median duration of response, 12.9 months [95% CI: 6.5-15.7]) and safety. The Phase III randomized GLORIOSA trial will evaluate MIRV plus bevacizumab vs. bevacizumab alone as maintenance therapy in patients with FRα-high PSOC who did not have disease progression following second-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05445778; GOG.org ID: GOG-3078; ENGOT.ESGO.org ID: ENGOT-ov76.

Most patients with ovarian cancer are initially treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. If the cancer reappears/recurs after more than 6 months following this therapy, it is called platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC). Patients with PSOC usually receive additional platinum-based chemotherapy along with bevacizumab, a drug that reduces tumor growth by decreasing its blood supply. If patients improve or are stable on this therapy, they are usually kept on bevacizumab alone for 'maintenance therapy'. Unfortunately, this maintenance therapy does not work long-term in all patients, so better long-term treatments are needed. The GLORIOSA (NCT05445778) clinical trial will compare maintenance therapy with bevacizumab alone to maintenance therapy with bevacizumab plus a drug called mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV) to determine which therapy leads to better results in patients with PSOC. MIRV is made up of an antibody that binds to a specific protein (folate receptor alpha [FRα]) on cancer cells to directly deliver a cancer-killing drug. MIRV received US FDA approval to be used as a therapy for patients with ovarian cancer who are resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy and express high levels of FRα. The GLORIOSA trial will study maintenance therapy with MIRV plus bevacizumab in patients with PSOC who have not had cancer progression after second-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, and whose cancer expresses high amounts of FRα. The main purpose of this trial is to determine if MIRV plus bevacizumab leads to better patient survival and decreases cancer growth and spread when compared with bevacizumab alone.

Optimizing maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: where do we stand in the year 2024?

INTRODUCTION: Despite the prognosis of patients affected by acute myeloid leukemia (AML) improved in the last decade, most patients relapse. Maintenance therapy after a chemotherapy approach with or without allogeneic stem cell transplantation could be a way to control the undetectable residual burden of leukemic cells. Several studies are being carried out as maintenance therapy in AML. Some critical points need to be defined, how the physician can choose among the various drugs available. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the advances and controversies surrounding maintenance therapy for AML patients. EXPERT OPINION: Patients withFLT3-positive AML should receive midostaurin or quizartinib in the first-linesetting. For a patient initially receiving midostaurin, consider switching to sorafenib in the post-transplant setting. Because of the improved safety profile and potency, many experts will lean toward using a second-generation FLT3 inhibitor such as quizartinib or gilteritinib. Finally, no data indicate whether maintenance therapy should be prolonged until progression or for a defined period.