Comprehensive Analysis of Immune Responses to Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about which patients are likely to benefit most from neoadjuvant immunotherapy. In this study, we performed a multiplatform analysis on samples from resectable NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy to explore molecular characteristics related to immune responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 17 patients with resectable stage IB-IIIA NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy were included. A multiplex cytokine assay, bulk TCR sequencing in peripheral blood, and multiplexed immunohistochemistry were performed. RESULTS: Low levels of stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1alpha at baseline were associated with unfavorable disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with major pathologic response (MPR) showed a decrease in HGF after one cycle of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. An increase in IDO and IP-10 was observed in patients who developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. There were no correlations between irAEs and MPR or DFS. The MPR group presented a significant decrease in white blood cells and neutrophil count after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The high peripheral baseline TCR convergence was correlated with MPR and favorable DFS in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy led to a significant increase in CD4+, CD8+, and CD8+CD39+ T-cell infiltration in tumor areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the potential roles of cytokines and TCR convergence for predicting ICIs response in resectable NSCLC and LUSC. CD8+CD39+T cells and CD4+ T cells could be involved in the action of neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Dynamics of peripheral blood inflammatory index predict tumor pathological response and survival among patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a multi-cohort retrospective study.

Background: Static tumor features before initiating anti-tumor treatment were insufficient to distinguish responding from non-responding tumors under the selective pressure of immuno-therapy. Herein we investigated the longitudinal dynamics of peripheral blood inflammatory indexes (dPBI) and its value in predicting major pathological response (MPR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A total of 147 patients with NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed as training cohort, and 26 NSCLC patients from a phase II trial were included as validation cohort. Peripheral blood inflammatory indexes were collected at baseline and as posttreatment status; their dynamics were calculated as their posttreatment values minus their baseline level. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was utilized to screen out predictors for MPR, and a MPR score was integrated. We constructed a model incorporating this MPR score and clinical predictors for predicting MPR and evaluated its predictive capacity via the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic and calibration curves. Furthermore, we sought to interpret this MPR score in the context of micro-RNA transcriptomic analysis in plasma exosomes for 12 paired samples (baseline and posttreatment) obtained from the training cohort. Results: Longitudinal dynamics of monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-albumin ratio, and prognostic nutritional index were screened out as significant indicators for MPR and a MPR score was integrated, which was further identified as an independent predictor of MPR. Then, we constructed a predictive model incorporating MPR score, histology, and differentiated degree, which discriminated MPR and non-MPR patients well in both the training and validation cohorts with an AUC value of 0.803 and 0.817, respectively. Furthermore, micro-RNA transcriptomic analysis revealed the association between our MPR score and immune regulation pathways. A significantly better event-free survival was seen in subpopulations with a high MPR score. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that dPBI reflected responses to neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy for NSCLC. The MPR score, a non-invasive biomarker integrating their dynamics, captured the miRNA transcriptomic pattern in the tumor microenvironment and distinguished MPR from non-MPR for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, which could support the clinical decisions on the utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatments in NSCLC patients.

Increased opioid consumption in neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter, prospective cohort study.

AIMS: PD-1 block was reported to impair opioid-induced antinociception and affect cognitive function in rodents and non-human primates. This prospective multicenter cohort study aims to investigate the possible impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with PD-1 antibody on perioperative analgesic effect of opioids and postoperative delirium (POD) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: Eighty-four NSCLC patients from three medical centers with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) or chemotherapy (nCT) were enrolled. The primary outcome is the total perioperative opioid consumption defined as the sum of intraoperative and postoperative opioid use within 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes compromise of incidence of POD, pain intensity, and number of analgesic pump press. Tumor prognostic parameters and perioperative change of inflammatory cytokines and soluble PD-L1 level were also recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included in the final analysis. The total opioid consumption (sufentanil equivalent) perioperatively in the nCIT group was significantly higher than that in the nCT group, with mean difference of 60.39 µg, 95% CI (25.58-95.19), p < 0.001. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that nCIT was correlated with increased total opioid consumption (ß = 0.305; 95% CI, 0.152-0.459; p < 0.001). The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain and cumulative analgesic pump press within 72 h was significantly higher in subjects with nCIT. There is no statistical difference in incidence of POD between groups within 72 h after surgery. The pathologic complete response rate and perioperative serum IL-6 level were higher in the nCIT group than in the nCT group. CONCLUSION: Patients with NSCLC receiving nCIT warrant increased opioid consumption perioperatively and suffered from more postoperative pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05273827.

The Role of Immunotherapy in the Management of Esophageal Cancer in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network advises neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for locally advanced cases of esophageal cancer. The role of immunotherapy in this context is under heavy investigation. METHODS: Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019. Three groups were generated as follows: (a) no immunotherapy, (b) neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and (c) adjuvant immunotherapy. Overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard analysis, adjusting for previously described risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: Of the total 14,244 patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 14,065 patients did not receive immunotherapy, 110 received neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and 69 received adjuvant immunotherapy. When adjusting for established risk factors, adjuvant immunotherapy was associated with significantly improved survival compared to no immunotherapy and neoadjuvant immunotherapy during a median follow-up period of 35.2 months. No difference was noted among patients who received no immunotherapy vs. neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the same model. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis of the NCDB, receiving adjuvant immunotherapy offered a significant survival advantage compared to no immunotherapy and neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The addition of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation did not improve survival in this cohort. Further studies are warranted to investigate the long-term outcomes of immunotherapy in esophageal cancer.

A machine learning radiomics based on enhanced computed tomography to predict neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Background: Patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIT) display variable treatment responses. The purpose of this study is to establish and validate a radiomics based on enhanced computed tomography (CT) and combined with clinical data to predict the major pathological response to NIT in ESCC patients. Methods: This retrospective study included 82 ESCC patients who were randomly divided into the training group (n = 57) and the validation group (n = 25). Radiomic features were derived from the tumor region in enhanced CT images obtained before treatment. After feature reduction and screening, radiomics was established. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to select clinical variables. The predictive model integrating radiomics and clinical data was constructed and presented as a nomogram. Area under curve (AUC) was applied to evaluate the predictive ability of the models, and decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves were performed to test the application of the models. Results: One clinical data (radiotherapy) and 10 radiomic features were identified and applied for the predictive model. The radiomics integrated with clinical data could achieve excellent predictive performance, with AUC values of 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.69-1.00) in the training group and the validation group, respectively. DCA and calibration curves demonstrated a good clinical feasibility and utility of this model. Conclusion: Enhanced CT image-based radiomics could predict the response of ESCC patients to NIT with high accuracy and robustness. The developed predictive model offers a valuable tool for assessing treatment efficacy prior to initiating therapy, thus providing individualized treatment regimens for patients.

Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive gastrectomy for older patients with gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG) in older patients with gastric cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, and efficacy of MIG for older patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy (NICT). METHODS: The clinical data of 726 older patients aged over 65 years who underwent upfront MIG or MIG after NICT in the Department of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center between Jan 2020 and Nov 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis at a ratio of 1:2 was performed to reduce bias from confounding patient-related variables, short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable between 61 patients in the NICT-MIG group and 114 patients in the MIG group after PSM (P > 0.05). The major pathological response (MPR) rate and pathological complete response (pCR) rate were 44.2% and 21.3%, respectively, in the NICT-MIG group. Patients in the NICT-MIG group had longer operation times (P = 0.005) and postoperative days (P = 0.030) than those in the MIG group. No significant differences were found in intraoperative bleeding, number of retrieved lymph nodes, first flatus day, R0 resection rate, overall postoperative complication (POC) morbidity, severe POC morbidity, 2-year overall, and recurrence-free survival between the MIG and NICT-MIG groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that an estimated blood loss > 200 mL (P = 0.010) and a lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) ≤ 3.25 (P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for POCs after MIG in older patients. CONCLUSION: The safety, and efficacy of NICT-MIG were comparable to those of upfront MIG in older patients with GC. Patients with an estimated blood loss > 200 mL or an LMR ≤ 3.25 should be carefully evaluated for an increased risk of POCs in older patients who undergo MIG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration Number: ChiCTR2400086827).

Less is more: Exploring neoadjuvant immunotherapy as a de-escalation strategy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) constitutes a significant global cancer burden, given its high prevalence and associated mortality. Despite substantial progress in survival rates due to the enhanced multidisciplinary approach to treatment, these methods often lead to severe tissue damage, compromised function, and potential toxicity. Thus, there is an imperative need for novel, effective, and minimally damaging treatment modalities. Neoadjuvant treatment, an emerging therapeutic strategy, is designed to reduce tumor size and curtail distant metastasis prior to definitive intervention. Currently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has optimized the treatment approach for a subset of HNSCC patients, yet it has not produced a noticeable enhancement in overall survival (OS). In the contemporary cancer therapeutics landscape, immunotherapy is gaining traction at an accelerated pace. Notably, neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAIT) has shown promising radiological and pathological responses, coupled with encouraging efficacy in several clinical trials. This potentially paves the way for a myriad of possibilities in treatment de-escalation of HNSCC, which warrants further exploration. This paper reviews the existing strategies and efficacies of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), along with potential de-escalation strategies. Furthermore, the challenges encountered in the context of the de-escalation strategies of NAIT are explored. The aim is to inform future research directions that strive to improve the quality of life (QoL) for patients battling HNSCC.

Neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with or without chemotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: A proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial.

We conducted a proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial to assess neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with or without chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiotherapy, and then consolidation SHR-1701 in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the primary cohort of patients receiving neoadjuvant combination therapy (n = 97), both primary endpoints were met, with a post-induction objective response rate of 58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47-68) and an 18-month event-free survival (EFS) rate of 56.6% (95% CI 45.2-66.5). Overall, 27 (25%) patients underwent surgery; all achieved R0 resection. Among them, 12 (44%) major pathological responses and seven (26%) pathological complete responses were recorded. The 18-month EFS rate was 74.1% (95% CI 53.2-86.7) in surgical patients and 57.3% (43.0-69.3) in radiotherapy-treated patients. Neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiotherapy, showed promising efficacy with a tolerable safety profile in unresectable stage III NSCLC. Surgical conversion was feasible in a notable proportion of patients and associated with better survival outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of different cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: There is no standard consensus on the optimal number of cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy prior to surgery for patients with locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We carried out a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with different treatment cycles in order to provide valuable information for clinical decision-making. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched before May 2023. The included studies were categorized based on different treatment cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to assess their respective efficacy and safety in patients with resectable NSCLC. Results: Incorporating data from 29 studies with 1331 patients, we found major pathological response rates of 43 % (95%CI, 34-52 %) with two cycles and 33 % (95%CI, 22-45 %) with three cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Radiological response rates were 39 % (95%CI, 28-50 %) and 56 % (95%CI, 44-68 %) for two and three cycles, respectively, with higher incidence rates of severe adverse events (SAEs) in the three-cycle group (32 %; 95%CI, 21-50 %). Despite similar rates of R0 resection between two and three cycles, the latter showed a slightly higher surgical delay rate (1 % vs. 7 %). Neoadjuvant treatment modes significantly affected outcomes, with the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy demonstrating superiority in improving pathological and radiological response rates, while the incidence of SAEs in patients receiving combination therapy remained within an acceptable range (23 %; 95%CI, 15-35 %). However, regardless of the treatment mode administered, an increase in the number of treatment cycles did not result in substantial improvement in pathological response rates. Conclusion: There are clear advantages of combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy in neoadjuvant settings. Increasing the number of cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy from two to three primarily may not substantially improve the overall efficacy, while increasing the risk of adverse events. Further analysis of the outcomes of four cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy is necessary.

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a systematic review.

Background: Several studies have explored the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer(LARC), particularly in microsatellite stable(MSS) or mismatch repair proficient(pMMR) LARC patients. We undertook a single-arm systematic review to comprehensively evaluate the advantages and potential risks associated with the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in conjunction with nCRT for patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, ASCO and ESMO were searched for related studies. The main outcomes were pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), anal preservation, and adverse effects (AEs). Results: Fourteen articles including 533 locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients were analyzed. The pooled pCR, MPR, and anal preservation rates were 36%, 66% and 86%. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 20%. Subgroup analysis showed that; dMMR/MSI-H had a pooled pCR (100%) and MPR (100%), pMMR/MSS had a pooled pCR (38%) and MPR (60%); the short-course radiotherapy and long-course radiotherapy had pooled pCR rates of 51% and 30%, respectively. The rates of pCR for the concurrent and sequential immuno-chemoradiotherapy subgroups at 30% and 40%, mirroring pCR rates for the PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitor subgroups were 32% and 40%, respectively. Conclusion: In cases of locally advanced rectal cancer, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have shown promising response rates and acceptable toxicity profiles. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy hence has a positive outcome even in MSS LARC patients. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#myprospero, identifier CRD42023465380.

The Role of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in the Management of Merkel Cell Carcinoma with Clinically Detected Regional Lymph Node Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy is emerging as a promising option for certain locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous malignancies. However, the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIO) in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) with clinically detected regional lymph node metastasis (CDRLNM) has not been fully elucidated. METHODS: For this study, MCC patients with CDRLNM who underwent surgical excision were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Those who received NIO were propensity-matched with those who did not, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 1809 selected patients, 356 (19.7%) received NIO followed by wide excision (n = 352, 98.9%) or amputation (n = 4, 1.1%). The rate of complete pathologic response for the primary tumor (ypT0) was 45.2%. Only 223 patents (63.4%) also underwent lymph node dissection (LND). The complete pathologic nodal response (ypN0) rate for these patients was 17.9%. A pathologic complete response of both the primary tumor and the nodal basin (ypT0 ypN0) was seen in 16 of the 223 patients who underwent both primary tumor surgery and LND. Subsequently, 151 pairs were matched between the NIO and no-NIO groups (including only patients with LND). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant OS improvement with NIO (median not reached vs. 35.0 ± 8.0 months; p = 0.025). The 5-year OS was 57% in the NIO group versus 44% in no-NIO group (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that NIO in MCC with CDRLNM provides improved OS in addition to promising rates of primary complete response, which could change the profile of surgical resection. This supports ongoing clinical trials exploring the use of NIO in MCC.

Effective neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy in stage IIIA adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung with a complete response and surgical success: A case report.

There has been rapid advancement in the development of neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which holds great promise as an effective treatment strategy. Some clinical trials have confirmed that immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy can be a recommended first-line regimen for neoadjuvant treatment of NSCLC. The present study describes the case of a male patient aged 65 years who was diagnosed with stage IIIA (cT2N2M0) adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung. After the administration of two cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (sintilimab) in combination with chemotherapy, stable disease was observed in the primary tumor, whereas partial remission was detected in the mediastinal lymph nodes based on imaging assessment. The patient underwent an immediate upper lobectomy of the left lung. Pathological analysis revealed a complete response in the primary lesion, with only minimal presence of tumor cells observed in the lymph nodes surrounding the mediastinum and bronchi. This indicated that the present neoadjuvant therapy could be used in the treatment of stage III adenosquamous lung carcinoma; however, to conclusively determine its efficacy, further studies targeting this specific cancer type are essential.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy improves outcomes for resectable gastroesophageal junction cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAIT) has developed rapidly in patients with gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). The suggested neoadjuvant treatment regimens for patients with GEJC may vary in light of the efficacy and safety results. METHODS: A search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was completed to locate studies examining the safety and effectiveness of NAIT for resectable GEJC. We analyzed the effect sizes (ES) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in addition to subgroups and heterogeneity. Meta-analyses were performed using Stata BE17 software. RESULTS: For these meta-analyses, 753 patients were chosen from 21 studies. The effectiveness of NAIT was assessed using the pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), and nodal downstage to ypN0 rate. The MPR, pCR, and nodal downstage to ypN0 rate values in NAIT were noticeably higher (MPR: ES = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.36-0.54; pCR: ES = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.21-0.32; nodal downstage to ypN0 rate: ES = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.48-0.72) than those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (MPR < 30%; pCR: ES = 3%-17%; nodal downstage to ypN0 rate: ES = 21%-29%). Safety was assessed using the treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) incidence rate, surgical delay rate, surgical complications incidence rate, and surgical resection rate. In conclusion, the incidence of trAEs, incidence of surgical complications, and surgical delay rate had ES values of 0.66, 0.48, and 0.09, respectively. These rates were comparable to those from nCT or nCRT (95% CI: 0.60-0.70; 0.15-0.51; and 0, respectively). The reported resection rates of 85%-95% with nCT or nCRT were comparable to the mean surgical resection rate of 90%. CONCLUSION: NAIT is an effective treatment for resectable GEJC; additionally, the level of NAIT toxicity is acceptable. The long-term effects of NAIT require further study.

Prognostic model based on B cell marker genes for NSCLC patients under neoadjuvant immunotherapy by integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing data.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has evolved as an effective option to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). B cells play essential roles in the immune system as well as cancer progression. However, the repertoire of B cells and its association with clinical outcomes remains unclear in NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. METHODS: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA sequencing data for LUAD samples were accessed from the TCGA and GEO databases. LUAD-related B cell marker genes were confirmed based on comprehensive analysis of scRNA-seq data. We then constructed the B cell marker gene signature (BCMGS) and validated it. In addition, we evaluated the association of BCGMS with tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) characteristics. Furthermore, we validated the efficacy of BCGMS in a cohort of NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. RESULTS: A BCMGS was constructed based on the TCGA cohort and further validated in three independent GSE cohorts. In addition, the BCMGS was proven to be significantly associated with TIME characteristics. Moreover, a relatively higher risk score indicated poor clinical outcomes and a worse immune response among NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: We constructed an 18-gene prognostic signature derived from B cell marker genes based on scRNA-seq data, which had the potential to predict the prognosis and immune response of NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Is neoadjuvant immunotherapy necessary in patients with programmed death ligand 1 expression-negative resectable non-small cell lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical benefit and necessity of neoadjuvant programmed cell death (or ligand) (PD-(L)1) blockades in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with negative PD-L1 expression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), major pathological response (MPR), and/or pathological complete response (pCR) between neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (nCIT) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) for patients with resectable NSCLC stratified by PD-L1 expression were eligible for inclusion in the study. Data regarding the pathological response and EFS were evaluated by the odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using random and fixed models. RESULTS: A total of six RCTs involving 3,194 patients with resectable NSCLC with or without neoadjuvant immunotherapy were included. Compared with nCT alone, nCIT significantly improved pCR (18.3 % vs. 3.0 %; OR, 5.64; 95 % CI, 3.22-9.89; P < 0.001), MPR (38.9 % vs. 15.5 %; OR, 3.57; 95 % CI, 2.10-6.05; P < 0.001), and EFS (HR, 0.75; 95 % CI, 0.62-0.90; P = 0.002) in PD-L1 <1 % NSCLC patients. In addition, PD-L1 ≥1 % was associated with higher rates of pCR (32.8 % vs. 18.3 %; OR, 2.28; 95 % CI, 1.40-3.73; P = 0.001) and MPR (53.9 % vs. 38.9 %; OR, 1.84; 95 % CI, 1.22-2.79; P = 004) and longer EFS (HR, 0.44 vs. 0.75) in the setting of nCIT compared with PD-L1 <1 %. nCIT improved only OS in NSCLC patients with PD-L1 ≥1 % but not in patients with PD-L1 <1 %. CONCLUSIONS: The use of nCIT should be recommended for resectable NSCLC patients with negative PD-L1 expression, as nCIT significantly improved the pathological response and EFS in these patients. The benefit to PD-L1-negative patients treated with nCIT on OS remains to be validated.

Association of pathological response with long-term survival outcomes after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Complete pathological response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) have been proven to have a close association with improved event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients accepting chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. However, further study focusing on neoadjuvant immunotherapy is limited. Here we provided an updated and comprehensive evaluation of the association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level and trial level for neoadjuvant immunotherapy. METHODS: We systematically searched and assessed studies in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and relevant conference abstracts from inception to June 1, 2023. Studies reported EFS/OS results by pCR/MPR status were eligible. RESULTS: Forty-three studies comprising a total of 4100 patients were eligible for the analysis, which included 39 studies for the patient-level analysis and 5 randomized controlled trials for the trial-level analysis. Our results highlighted that pCR was associated with improved EFS (HR, 0.48 [95 % CI, 0.39-0.60]) and OS (HR, 0.55 [95 % CI, 0.41-0.74]). The magnitude of HRs by MPR status were similar to the results by pCR status (EFS HR, 0.31 [95 % CI, 0.18-0.53]) and OS HR, 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.19-0.96]). However, no association between pCR and EFS at trial level was found (P = 0.8, R2 = 0). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrates a strong association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level across studies applying neoadjuvant immunotherapy in most solid tumors but we fail to validate the relationship at trial level. Therefore, an accepted surrogate endpoint applied to both patient and trial levels are waited for further search.

Current status of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors worldwide, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. At present, comprehensive surgical treatment has enhanced the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer patients significantly. However, the postoperative recurrence rate remains high, and the long-term survival for patients is sub-optimal. In recent years, immunotherapy has garnered extensive attention as an innovative approach to the treatment of gastric cancer. Indeed, multiple studies have validated its therapeutic effects in advanced gastric cancer patients, leading to its incorporation into treatment guidelines. Currently, researchers are exploring the application of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting globally in order to further adjust and refine neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimens for gastric cancer. This article summarizes the research progress and controversies associated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy in gastric cancer, aiming to optimize clinical benefits for gastric cancer patients undergoing this treatment approach. The retrieval methods of this study encompassed databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, etc. The retrieved articles included guidelines, consensus, meta-analyses, clinical trials, and reviews related to locally advanced gastric cancer published up to January 2024.

Down-regulated HHLA2 enhances neoadjuvant immunotherapy efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggested a favorable outcome in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients treated by immunotherapy. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunotherapy among NSCLC with COPD versus NSCLC without COPD and explore the potential mechanistic links. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between November 2020 and January 2023 were reviewed. The assessment of neoadjuvant immunotherapy's effectiveness was conducted based on the major pathologic response (MPR). The gene expression profile was investigated by RNA sequencing data. Immune cell proportions were examined using flow cytometry. The association between gene expression, immune cells, and pathologic response was validated by immunohistochemistry and single-cell data. RESULTS: A total of 230 NSCLC patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy were analyzed, including 60 (26.1%) with COPD. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that COPD was a predictor for MPR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy [odds ratio (OR), 2.490; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.295-4.912; P = 0.007]. NSCLC with COPD showed a down-regulation of HERV-H LTR-associating protein 2 (HHLA2), which was an immune checkpoint molecule, and the HHLA2low group demonstrated the enrichment of CD8+CD103+ tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM) compared to the HHLA2high group (11.9% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.013). Single-cell analysis revealed TRM enrichment in the MPR group. Similarly, NSCLC with COPD exhibited a higher proportion of CD8+CD103+TRM compared to NSCLC without COPD (11.9% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: The study identified NSCLC with COPD as a favorable lung cancer type for neoadjuvant immunotherapy, offering a new perspective on the multimodality treatment of this patient population. Down-regulated HHLA2 in NSCLC with COPD might improve the MPR rate to neoadjuvant immunotherapy owing to the enrichment of CD8+CD103+TRM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Approval for the collection and utilization of clinical samples was granted by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (Approval number: K23-228).

Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a case report.

Background: The morbidity and mortality of lung cancer have always ranked first among malignant tumors (MTs). Previous studies have shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy can improve the 5-year survival rate of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the benefit is limited. Studies have proven that neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has unique advantages in prolonging patient survival, reducing distant recurrence, and inducing antitumor immunity. However, its impact remains to be more comprehensively investigated. Case Description: A 59-year-old male who was admitted to the hospital with a primary complaint of repeated cough and expectoration for 6 months. Preoperative assessment showed right upper lung squamous cell carcinoma with multiple hilar and mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and the clinical stage was cT2aN2M0 stage (IIIA). After three cycles of pembrolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel therapy were administered, the reexamination of the tumor was evaluated as partial response (PR), and a sleeve lobectomy of the right upper lung was performed under single-port thoracoscopic surgery. The operation proceeded smoothly without conversion to thoracotomy, and R0 resection was successfully achieved. Postoperative pathological stage was ypT1bN0M0 stage IA, and postoperative pathological remission was evaluated as major pathological response (MPR). After the operation, three cycles of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy were completed, which was followed by maintenance therapy with pembrolizumab monotherapy for 1 year, and no signs of tumor recurrence and metastasis have been found in follow-up thus far. Conclusions: Through this case, we believe that for locally advanced NSCLC sleeve lobectomy after neoadjuvant therapy may be a safe and feasible treatment option, can avoid pneumonectomy, protect the lung function of patients, and still ensure the R0 resection rate. Moreover, it may does not significantly increase the difficulty of surgical operation or reduce safety. However, further research is needed to confirm our conclusion. And then, neoadjuvant therapy in the perioperative period may induce a series of side effects or adverse reactions, and thus greater attention should be paid to its timely management.

Molecular and Clinicopathological Biomarkers in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Patients with Advanced Resectable Melanoma.

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is emerging as the best medical practice in patients with resectable stage III melanoma. As different regimens are expected to become available in this approach, the improved optimization of treatment strategies is required. Personalization of care in each individual patient-by precisely determining the disease-related risk and the most efficient therapeutic approach-is expected to minimize disease recurrence, but also the incidence of treatment-related adverse events and the extent of surgical intervention. This can be achieved through validation and clinical application of predictive and prognostic biomarkers. For immune checkpoint inhibitors, there are no validated predictive biomarkers until now. Promising predictive molecular biomarkers for neoadjuvant immunotherapy are tumor mutational burden and the interferon-gamma pathway expression signature. Pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is a biomarker of a favorable prognosis and surrogate endpoint for recurrence-free survival in clinical trials. Despite the reliability of these biomarkers, risk stratification and response prediction in the neoadjuvant setting are still unsatisfactory and represent a critical knowledge gap, limiting the development of optimized personalized strategies in everyday practice.