Platelet reactivity is associated with pump thrombosis in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Background: Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are treated with a potent antithrombotic regimen to prevent pump thrombosis and thromboembolism. High on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) is associated with ischemic outcomes in cardiovascular disease. Objectives: In the current study, we investigated the prevalence and clinical impact of HRPR in stable LVAD patients. Methods: Pump thrombosis, bleeding events, and death were assessed in 62 LVAD patients (19 HeartWare HVAD [Medtronic] and 43 HeartMate 3 [Abbott]) during a 2-year follow-up. Platelet aggregation was measured by multiple electrode aggregometry, and HRPR was defined as arachidonic acid (AA)-inducible platelet aggregation of ≥21 aggregation units. Soluble P-selectin was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Three patients (4.8%) had pump thrombosis and 10 patients (16.1%) suffered a bleeding complication. AA-inducible platelet aggregation was significantly higher in patients with pump thrombosis (P = .01), whereas platelet aggregation in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) was comparable between patients without and those with pump thrombosis (both P > .05). Platelet aggregation in response to AA, ADP, and TRAP was similar in patients without and with a bleeding event (all P > .05). HRPR was detected in 29 patients (46.8%) and was associated with significantly higher platelet aggregation in response to AA, ADP, and TRAP as well as higher levels of soluble P-selectin compared with patients without HRPR (all P < .05). All pump thromboses occurred in patients with HRPR (3 vs 0; P = .06) and HVAD. Conclusion: Platelet reactivity is associated with pump thrombosis in LVAD patients. HRPR may represent a risk marker for pump thrombosis, particularly in HVAD patients.

Elevated High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Level Enhances the Impact of Lipoprotein(a) on Platelet Reactivity in PCI Patients Treated with Clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the effect of Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] on thrombogenesis has aroused great interest, while inflammation has been reported to modify the Lp(a)-associated risks through an unidentified mechanism. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between platelet reactivity with Lp(a) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in percutaneous intervention (PCI) patients treated with clopidogrel. METHODS: Data were collected from 10,724 consecutive PCI patients throughout the year 2013 in Fuwai Hospital. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) and low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) were defined as thrombelastography (TEG) maximum amplitude of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet (MAADP) > 47 mm and < 31 mm, respectively. RESULTS: 6615 patients with TEG results were finally enrolled. The mean age was 58.24 ± 10.28 years and 5131 (77.6%) were male. Multivariable logistic regression showed that taking Lp(a) < 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP < 2 mg/L as the reference, isolated Lp(a) elevation [Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP < 2 mg/L] was not significantly associated with HTPR (P = 0.153) or LTPR (P = 0.312). However, the joint elevation of Lp(a) and hs-CRP [Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP ≥ 2 mg/L] exhibited enhanced association with both HTPR (OR:1.976, 95% CI 1.677-2.329) and LTPR (OR:0.533, 95% CI 0.454-0.627). CONCLUSIONS: The isolated elevation of Lp(a) level was not an independent indicator for platelet reactivity, yet the concomitant elevation of Lp(a) and hs-CRP levels was significantly associated with increased platelet reactivity. Whether intensified antiplatelet therapy or anti-inflammatory strategies could mitigate the risks in patients presenting combined Lp(a) and hs-CRP elevation requires future investigation.

Inflammation modifies the platelet reactivity among thrombocytopenia patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients combined with thrombocytopenia (TP) are usually considered to be at low ischemic risk, receiving less proper antiplatelet therapy. However, recent studies reported a paradoxical phenomenon that PCI patients with TP were prone to experience thrombotic events, while the mechanisms and future treatment remain unclear. We aim to investigate whether inflammation modifies platelet reactivity among these patients. Consecutive 10 724 patients undergoing PCI in Fuwai Hospital were enrolled throughout 2013. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) ≥2 mg/L was considered inflammatory status. TP was defined as platelet count <150×109/L. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was defined as adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet maximum amplitude of thromboelastogram >47mm. Among 6617 patients finally included, 879 (13.3%) presented with TP. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that patients with TP were associated with a lower risk of HTPR (odds ratio [OR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.76) than those without TP in the overall cohort. In further analysis, among hsCRP <2 mg/L group, patients with TP exhibited a decreased risk of HTPR (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41-0.68); however, in hsCRP ≥2mg/L group, TP patients had a similar risk of HTPR as those without TP (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.63-1.08). Additionally, these results remain consistent across subgroups, including patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and chronic coronary syndrome. Inflammation modified the platelet reactivity of PCI patients with TP, providing new insights into the mechanisms of the increased thrombotic risk. Future management for this special population should pay more attention to inflammation status and timely adjustment of antiplatelet therapy in TP patients with inflammation.

What is the context? Recent studies reported a paradoxical phenomenon that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients with thrombocytopenia (TP) were prone to experience thrombotic events. The potential mechanisms underlying the increased thrombotic risk and how to manage antiplatelet therapy in PCI patients with TP remain unclear.Growing attention has been paid to immunothrombosis. Inflammation is closely associated with high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) and thrombotic risk.HTPR is an independent risk factor of thrombosis and can provide information for guiding antiplatelet therapy.What is new? This prospective cohort study enrolled 10 724 patients undergoing PCI in Fuwai Hospital (National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China), with HTPR risk being the study endpoint of interest.We first reported that inflammation significantly modified the platelet reactivity of PCI patients with TP.When hsCRP level <2 mg/L, PCI patients with TP had a decreased risk of HTPR. However, when hsCRP ≥2 mg/L, TP patients had similar HTPR risk as those without TP.HsCRP levels could modify the relationship between TP and HTPR risks both in patients with acute coronary syndrome and chronic coronary syndrome.What is the impact? These results provide insights into potential mechanisms of the increased thrombotic risk in PCI patients with TP. Specifically, inflammation might be involved in the thrombotic risk of PCI patients with TP by modifying the platelet reactivity.As for future management, personalized antiplatelet therapy should be administrated to TP patients with inflammation status.

The rapid change of shear rate gradient is beneficial to platelet activation.

Fluid shear plays a key role in hemostasis and thrombosis, and the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of shear gradient change rate (SGCR) on platelet reactivity and von Willebrand factor (vWF) activity and its mechanism. In this study, we developed a set of microfluidic chips capable of generating different shear gradients and simulated the shear rate distribution in the flow field by COMSOL Multiphysics software. Molecular markers of platelet activation (P-selectin, activated GPIIb/IIIa, phosphatidylserine exposure, and monocyte-platelet aggregate formation) were analyzed by flow cytometry. Platelet aggregation induced by shear gradient was studied by a microfluidic experimental platform, and plasma vWF ristocetin cofactor (vWF: RCO) activity was investigated by flow cytometry. The expression of p-Akt was studied by Western blotting. The results showed that the faster the SGCR, the higher the expression of platelet p-Akt, and the stronger the platelet reactivity and vWF activity. This indicates that fluid shear stress can activate platelets and vWF in a shear gradient-dependent manner through the PI3K/AKT signal pathway, and the faster the SGCR, the more significant the activation effect.

What is the context? Recent studies have shown that fluid shear stress plays a key role in platelet activation and thrombosis. However, its mechanism and effect have not been fully elucidated.The development of microfluidic chip technology enables people to study platelet function in a precisely controlled flow field environment.Previous studies have shown that the PI3K-AKT signal pathway may be a mechanically sensitive signal transduction pathway.What is new?In this study, we designed a microfluidic model with different narrow geometry, and controlled the injection pump to perfuse fluid at the same flow rate, so that the platelets flowing through the model experienced the flow field environment of different shear gradients.We studied the activities of platelets and von Willebrand factor in different flow fields and explored their signal transduction pathways.What is the impact? Our results suggest that vascular stenosis does increase platelet activity and the risk of thrombosis. However, its ability to activate platelets is not only related to the peak shear rate and shear time, but also closely related to the decreasing rate of shear gradient. Even if the peak shear rate at the stenosis is the same, the faster the shear rate decreases, the higher the reactivity of platelets and von Willebrand factor, which may be mediated by the PI3K-AKT signal pathway. This study not only helps clinicians to judge the risk of thrombosis in patients with atherosclerosis or percutaneous coronary intervention, but also helps us to better understand the mechanism of shear-induced platelet activation.

Immature platelet fraction and immature platelet count as novel biomarkers of elevated platelet reactivity in NSTE-ACS patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Some patients may not respond to such therapy adequately, which is associated with a greater risk of ischemic events. Reticulated platelets are the youngest, largest, and most active platelet subtype. They have been initially shown to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and increased platelet activity. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the presented study was to evaluate whether the immature platelet fraction (IPF) reflects the response to antiplatelet treatment in invasively managed ACS patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study enrolled ACS patients treated with PCI and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) comprising acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel or ticagrelor. In all patients, venous blood was collected within 24 h after the procedure. Platelet parameters were measured, including IPF using the Sysmex hematological analyzer and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet reactivity using the Multiplate® Analyzer. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were enrolled, including 62 with ST-segment elevation ACS (STE-ACS) and 46 with non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). Of them, 20.4% had diabetes mellitus, 26.9% had a history of MI and 59.2% of smoking. Spearman's correlation analysis demonstrated that higher IPF and immature platelet count (IPC) values are associated with increased ADP-induced platelet reactivity (respectively: rho = 0.387, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.101-0.615, p = 0.008; and rho = 0.458, 95% CI: 0.185-0.666, p = 0.001) in NSTE-ACS but not in STE-ACS patients. CONCLUSION: Immature platelet count and IPF may be valuable markers of platelet activity in patients with NSTE-ACS treated invasively and receiving DAPT (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT06177587).

Platelet inhibition with orodispersible ticagrelor in acute coronary syndromes according to morphine use: the TASTER study final results.

AIM: To date, it is still unknown whether orodispersible tablet (ODT) ticagrelor might represent a suitable way to reach a proper antiaggregation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients receiving morphine. Aim of the present study was to evaluate platelet inhibition with 180 mg ticagrelor loading dose (LD) administered as ODT compared with standard coated tablet ticagrelor formulation in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to morphine use. METHODS AND RESULTS: One-hundred and 30 patients presenting with STEMI or very high-risk NSTE-ACS were randomly assigned to receive ODT or standard ticagrelor LD. Potential morphine-ticagrelor interaction was assessed by stratified randomization according to morphine use. Platelet reactivity was evaluated by Platelet Reactivity Units (PRU) VerifyNow™ 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after ticagrelor LD. The primary endpoint was residual platelet reactivity 1 h after LD across the two ticagrelor formulation and according to morphine use. Safety endpoints were major bleedings and other in-hospital ticagrelor administration-related adverse events. One hour after LD, PRU median value was higher in morphine-treated patients (N = 32) as compared with patients not receiving morphine (N = 98; PRU = 187 [70-217]) vs. 73 [7-187]; P = 0.012). In patients with morphine, 1-h PRU values were similar between study groups (192 [114-236] vs. 173 [16-215] in ODT and standard tablet ticagrelor, respectively). Similarly, in patients without morphine, 1-h PRU values were not significantly different between study groups (69 [8-152] vs. 110 [6-193] in ODT and standard tablet ticagrelor, respectively). Platelet reactivity appeared similar in the 2 study arms at 2, 4, and 6 h after LD. No significant difference was observed among patients with or without morphine regarding in-hospital adverse events or drug side-effects, even if a reinfarction due to acute stent thrombosis was observed in a patient treated with morphine. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between ODT and standard ticagrelor tablets in terms of post-LD residual platelet reactivity, percentage of platelet inhibition or safety regardless to morphine use.

Association of ADP-Induced Whole-Blood Platelet Aggregation with Serum Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease When Receiving Maintenance Ticagrelor-Based Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

The degree of platelet inhibition in patients undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) affects cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. Our aim was to search for correlates of residual ex vivo platelet reactivity and circulating soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin), an index of in vivo platelet activation, in patients being treated by DAPT with ticagrelor. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregability (by multiple electrode aggregometry) and plasma sP-selectin were estimated in 62 stable post-ACS subjects (46 men and 16 women; mean age: 64 ± 10 years; 30 with type 2 diabetes (T2DM)) undergoing maintenance DAPT with ticagrelor and aspirin. These patients did not exhibit heart failure or other relevant coexistent diseases except for properly controlled T2DM, mild renal insufficiency, and hypertension. We also assessed this in 64 subjects on clopidogrel-based DAPT matched for age, sex, and T2DM status. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was below the optimal levels (190-460 arbitrary units (AU) * min) in most patients receiving ticagrelor-based DAPT, especially in those with below-median (<1.9 mmol/L) serum concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) (128 ± 61 vs. 167 ± 73 AU * min for below-median and above-median LDL-c, respectively, p = 0.025). In contrast, platelet reactivity did not differ by LDL-c on clopidogrel-based DAPT (246 ± 101 vs. 268 ± 108 AU * min for below-median and above-median LDL-c, respectively, p > 0.4). Plasma sP-selectin was found to be unrelated to serum LDL-c when receiving DAPT with ticagrelor (p > 0.4) or clopidogrel (p > 0.8). In conclusion, our preliminary observational study suggests the association of lower residual ex vivo platelet aggregability with better LDL-c control in patients undergoing ticagrelor-based maintenance DAPT, which does not appear to be reflected by plasma sP-selectin. Whether the serum LDL-c level should be considered among the factors affecting the degree of platelet inhibition for those treated with ticagrelor-based DAPT needs to be investigated in larger studies.

On-treatment platelet reactivity through the thromboxane A2 or P2Y12 platelet receptor pathways is not affected by pelacarsen.

BACKGROUND: Pelacarsen decreases plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and oxidized phospholipids (OxPL). It was previously reported that pelacarsen does not affect the platelet count. We now report the effect of pelacarsen on on-treatment platelet reactivity. METHODS: Subjects with established cardiovascular disease and screening Lp(a) levels ≥60 mg per deciliter (~ ≥150 nmol/L) were randomized to receive pelacarsen (20, 40, or 60 mg every 4 weeks; 20 mg every 2 weeks; or 20 mg every week), or placebo for 6-12 months. Aspirin Reaction Units (ARU) and P2Y12 Reaction Units (PRU) were measured at baseline and the primary analysis timepoint (PAT) at 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 286 subjects randomized, 275 had either an ARU or PRU test, 159 (57.8%) were on aspirin alone and 94 (34.2%) subjects were on dual anti-platelet therapy. As expected, the baseline ARU and PRU were suppressed in subjects on aspirin or on dual anti-platelet therapy, respectively. There were no significant differences in baseline ARU in the aspirin groups or in PRU in the dual anti-platelet groups. At the PAT there were no statistically significant differences in ARU in subjects on aspirin or PRU in subjects on dual anti-platelet therapy among any of the pelacarsen groups compared to the pooled placebo group (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Pelacarsen does not modify on-treatment platelet reactivity through the thromboxane A2 or P2Y12 platelet receptor pathways.

The association between higher FFAs and high residual platelet reactivity among CAD patients receiving clopidogrel therapy.

Background: Metabolic abnormalities are associated with the occurrence, severity, and poor prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), some of which affect the antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel. Free fatty acids (FFAs) is a biomarker for metabolic abnormalities, and elevated FFAs is observed among CAD patients. Whether FFAs enhances residual platelet reactivity induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) while using clopidogrel was unknown. The purpose of our study is exploring the issue. Method: Current study included 1,277 CAD patients using clopidogrel and used logistic regression to detect whether the higher level of FFAs is associated with high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR). We additionally performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to evaluate the stability of the results. We defined HRPR as ADP-induced platelet inhibition rate (ADPi) < 50% plus ADP-induced maximum amplitude (MAADP) > 47 mm. Results: 486 patients (38.1%) showed HRPR. The proportion of HRPR among patients with higher FFAs (>0.445 mmol/L) is greater than among patients with lower FFAs (46.4% vs. 32.6%, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that higher FFAs (>0.445 mmol/L) is independently associated with HRPR (adjusted OR = 1.745, 95% CI, 1.352-2.254). After subgroup and sensitivity analyses, the results remained robust. Conclusion: The higher level of FFAs enhances residual platelet reactivity induced by ADP and is independently associated with clopidogrel HRPR.

Altered platelet reactivity, coagulation, endothelial and inflammatory markers early after smoking cessation verified with cotinine plasma concentration.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Cigarette smoking is a potent modifiable risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, little is known about alterations to prothrombotic state and platelet reactivity early after smoking cessation following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). PURPOSE: We investigated alterations to platelet reactivity, coagulation and markers of platelet, endothelial, inflammatory and coagulation activation in clopidogrel-treated patients with CAD after PCI before and after smoking cessation. METHODS: Smoking patients aged 18 years or older at least 30 days after PCI were recruited and encouraged to quit the habit. At baseline and at 30 days, we measured platelet reactivity with VerifyNow system, thrombomodulin, P-selectin, platelet factor 4 (CXCL4/PF4), citrullinated histone H3 (H3cit) and cotinine level. RESULTS: Among 117 patients, 84 patients (72%) at a median age of 60.5 years (40 [interquartile range 30-47] pack-years) completed a 30-day follow-up. At day 30, 30 (35.7%) patients stopped smoking with cotinine level < 50 ng/ml. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. In smoking quitters a change in platelet reactivity was larger (Δ platelet reactivity units (PRU) 19 [2, 43] vs. -6 [-32, 37], p = 0.018), along with a change in P-selectin concentration (-11.82 [-23.62, 1.34] vs. 7.19 [-14.24, 17.19] ng/ml, p = 0.005). Positive correlations was noticed between cotinine and both P-selectin ( r = 0.23, p = 0.045) and CXCL4 (r = 0.27, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: After smoking cessation in CAD patients following PCI an increase in platelet reactivity and a decrease in P-selectin levels were observed. The risk of thrombotic complications post PCI might be paradoxically enhanced among patients who stopped smoking.

Impact of renal function on Ticagrelor-induced antiplatelet effects in coronary artery disease patients.

Background: Chronic renal failure (CKD) is associated with the presence of increased platelet reactivity and lower clinical benefit of clopidogrel. Ticagrelor has a more favorable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile compared to clopidogrel, which has translated into better clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We conducted a prospective mechanistic cohort study in order to investigate the impact of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in patients with acute ACS. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups based on their estimated renal clearances (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min and eGFR < 60 mL/min). Platelet function was determined using the VerifyNow system at baseline, after the ticagrelor loading dose and at discharge. In addition, levels of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (AR-C124910XX) were determined in the first hour after loading dose. Results: 48 patients were recruited (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min: 35 and eGFR < 60 mL/min: 13). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of platelet inhibition after the loading or after 7 days of treatment (p = 0.219). However, the levels of ticagrelor and its active metabolite were lower in subjects with normal renal function than in CKD, especially at 4 (p = 0.02 and 0.04 respectively) and 6 h of loading (p = 0.042 and 0.08 respectively). Conclusion: No differences in platelet inhibition were observed after treatment with ticagrelor in patients with different renal function, although patients with renal impairment showed higher levels of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX after 4 h of the loading dose.

Platelet reactivity expressed as a novel platelet reactivity score is associated with higher inflammatory state after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Introduction: Despite therapy, patients operated using a cardiopulmonary bypass demonstrate increased platelet aggregation, which rebounds to above preoperative levels. The aim of the study was to test the interaction between platelet reactivity/activation and selected inflammatory markers in the post-operative period. Material and methods: In total, 103 patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) who were not eligible for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and required urgent revascularization, were included. Platelet reactivity was measured using the PFA-100 platelet analyser, multiple electrode aggregometry, and was expressed as a novel platelet reactivity score (PRS). Patients were divided using their PRS scores into high platelet relativity or low platelet reactivity subgroups (HPR or LPR). Platelet basal activation was measured using immunoassays for soluble P-selectin and soluble CD40L. We measured high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and used immunoassays for tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) as inflammation markers. Results: Significant differences between HPR and LPR groups were found for CRP (mg/l): 81.5 vs. 44.6, p < 0.02; and TNF-α (pg/l): 3.51 vs. 2.37, p < 0.02. A significant association was found between CRP, TNF-α, IL-6 and platelet reactivity (platelet reactivity score). Cohen's k showed: CRP = 0.49, p < 0.0001, TNF-α = 0.37, p < 0.002. Perioperative myocardial infarction and rhythm disturbances occurred more frequently in the high platelet reactivity group: 7 (16.3%) vs. 2 (3.3%), p < 0.04, and 9 (20.9%) vs. 4 (6.7%), p < 0.04, respectively. Conclusions: Inflammatory parameters CRP and TNF-α are strongly associated with platelet reactivity (expressed as PRS) in cardiopulmonary bypass graft patients. Platelet hyperreactivity in the early post-operative period combined with a systemic inflammatory state correlates with a higher risk of post-operative rhythm disturbances and myocardial infarction.

Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Is Associated with Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are a risk factor for adverse outcomes, including mortality. We investigated the association of growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, an established predictor of bleeding complications, with on-treatment platelet reactivity in ACS patients undergoing coronary stenting receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor. Platelet aggregation was measured by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA), thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP, a protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) agonist), AYPGKF (a PAR-4 agonist) and collagen (COL). GDF-15 levels were measured using a commercially available assay. GDF-15 correlated inversely with MEA ADP (r = -0.202, p = 0.004), MEA AA (r = -0.139, p = 0.048) and MEA TRAP (r = -0.190, p = 0.007). After adjustment, GDF-15 was significantly associated with MEA TRAP (ß = -0.150, p = 0.044), whereas no significant associations were detectable for the other agonists. Patients with low platelet reactivity in response to ADP had significantly higher GDF-15 levels (p = 0.005). In conclusion, GDF-15 is inversely associated with TRAP-inducible platelet aggregation in ACS patients treated with state-of-the-art antiplatelet therapy and significantly elevated in patients with low platelet reactivity in response to ADP.

High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity: Aspirin versus Clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic regimen in patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging. At least, one antiplatelet agent in combination with OAC is recommended after PCI for 6-12 months. Clopidogrel is used most frequently in this setting. However, data comparing P2Y12 inhibition with clopidogrel versus cyclooxygenase inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is missing. It is well known that the antiplatelet effects of ASA and clopidogrel are frequently impaired (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). In this pilot investigation, we compared the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel versus ASA. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center database analysis, we investigated platelet reactivity by light transmission aggregometry in patients under different antiplatelet regimes. Results were presented as maximum of aggregation (MoA). HTPR to ASA and to clopidogrel were assessed. RESULTS: 755 patients were enrolled. 677 were on ASA, 521 were on clopidogrel, and 198 had OAC. Overall mean age was 73 ± 13.4 years, and 458 (60.7%) were male. HTPR to ASA occurred in 94/677 patients (13.9%), and mean arachidonic acid-induced MoA was 14.15 ± 19.04%. HTPR to clopidogrel occurred in 241/521 patients (46.3%), and mean adenosine diphosphate-induced MoA was 50.06 ± 20.42%. HTPR to clopidogrel was significantly more frequent than HTPR to ASA; single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT)-mono ASA: 27/199 (13.6%) versus mono clopidogrel: 6/18 (33.3%); p = 0.037; SAPT with OAC-OAC with ASA: 8/35 (22.9%) versus OAC with clopidogrel: 27/60 (45%); p = 0.046. Same difference in HTPR contingency could be shown in subgroups of dual antiplatelet therapy and ASA + clopidogrel + OAC therapy. CONCLUSION: Impaired pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel was more frequent as HTPR to ASA. Hence, ASA should be tested in combination with OAC post-PCI.

Effects of exercise on platelet reactivity after myocardial infarction: a randomized clinical trial.

Exercise training (ET) can lower platelet reactivity in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. However, the effects of ET on platelet reactivity in higher-risk patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ET on platelet reactivity in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI). Ninety patients were randomly assigned 1 month post-MI to the intervention (patients submitted to a supervised ET program) or control group. All patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Platelet reactivity by VerifyNow-P2Y12 (measured by P2Y12 reaction units - PRUs) test was determined at baseline and at the end of 14 ± 2 weeks of follow-up at rest (primary endpoint), and multiplate electrode aggregometry (MEA) adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and aspirin (ASPI) tests were performed immediately before and after the maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) at the same time points (secondary endpoints). Sixty-five patients (mean age 58.9 ± 10 years; 73.8% men; 60% ST elevation MI) completed follow-up (control group, n = 31; intervention group, n = 34). At the end of the follow-up, the mean platelet reactivity was 172.8 ± 68.9 PRUs and 166.9 ± 65.1 PRUs for the control and intervention groups, respectively (p = .72). Platelet reactivity was significantly increased after the CPET compared to rest at the beginning and at the end of the 14-week follow-up (among the intervention groups) by the MEA-ADP and MEA-ASPI tests (p < .01 for all analyses). In post-MI patients on DAPT, 14 weeks of supervised ET did not reduce platelet reactivity. Moreover, platelet reactivity was increased after high-intensity exercise (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02958657; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02958657).

What is the context? Platelet reactivity is reduced after exercise training in healthy individuals and patients with cardiovascular risk factors, but the effect in higher-risk patients is unknown.High-intensity exercise in untrained individuals increases platelet reactivity. The effect of dual antiplatelet therapy in inhibiting exercise-induced hyperreactivity is poorly understood.What's new?Exercise training did not reduce platelet reactivity in post-myocardial infarction patients.High-intensity exercise increased platelet reactivity in post-myocardial infarction patients on dual antiplatelet therapy.Exercise training did not attenuate the exercise-induced increase in platelet reactivity.What's the impact?The study suggests that strenuous exercise, if indicated, should be applied carefully to patients with high risk of recurrent ischemic events, even if on optimal medical therapy and after being trained.

Time from blood draw to multiple electrode aggregometry and association with platelet reactivity.

Results from multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) may vary according to pre-analytic factors. This study aimed to analyze the association of time from blood draw to MEA in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this observational single-center cohort study, platelet aggregation (aggregation units, U) was quantified by MEA (Multiplate Analyzer) after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP; final concentration [Fc] 6.4 µM), thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP; Fc 32 µM), or arachidonic acid (AA; Fc 0.5 mM) in patients treated with ASA and clopidogrel following PCI. High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as ADP-induced platelet aggregation ≥ 46 U. The manufacturer recommends performing the analysis within 30-180 min after blood draw. Patients were grouped according to the time from blood draw to MEA: 30-180 min, < 30 min, or > 180 min. Platelet function of 273 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI with dual antiplatelet therapy was analyzed. The median age was 72 years (interquartile range, IQR 62-79) and 179 (66%) were male. Median ADP-, TRAP-, and AA-induced aggregation was 25 (IQR 18-36) U, 79 (IQR 63-96) U, and 12 (IQR 7-18) U, respectively. For those analyzed within 30-180 min from blood draw, no significant correlation of time from blood draw to MEA was observed 1) ADP (r = - 0.04, p = 0.51); 2) TRAP (r = - 0.06, p = 0.32); 3) AA (r = - 0.03, p = 0.67). In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, the time from blood draw to multiple electrode aggregometry does not correlate with ADP- induced aggregation when the measurement occurred within the recommended time interval of 30-180 min after blood draw.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with 3rd Generation P2Y12 Inhibitors in STEMI Patients: Impact of Body Mass Index on Loading Dose-Response.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and platelet reactivity in STEMI patients treated with oral 3rd generation P2Y12 inhibitors. METHODS: Overall, 429 STEMI patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to BMI (BMI < 25 vs ≥ 25 kg/m2). A propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to balance potential confounders in patient baseline characteristics. Platelet reactivity was assessed by VerifyNow at baseline and after 3rd generation P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) loading dose (LD). Blood samples were obtained at baseline (T0), 1 h (T1), 2 h (T2), 4-6 h (T3), and 8-12 h (T4) after the LD. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was defined as a platelet reactivity unit value ≥ 208 units. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, patients with BMI ≥ 25 had similar values of baseline platelet reactivity, while they had higher level of platelet reactivity at 1 and 2 h after the LD and higher rate of HRPT. Furthermore, multivariate analysis demonstrated that BMI ≥ 25 was an independent predictor of HTPR at 2 h (OR 2.01, p = .009). Conversely, starting from 4 h after the LD, platelet reactivity values and HRPT rates were comparable among the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 is associated with delayed pharmacodynamic response to oral 3rd generation P2Y12 inhibitor LD, and it is a strong predictor of HTPR in STEMI patients treated by dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor or prasugrel.

Effects of ilaprazole on the steady-state pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel in healthy volunteers: An open-label randomized crossover study.

Background: Previous studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitors could impair the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. It is uncertain whether ilaprazole affects the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. This study aimed to determine the drug-drug interaction between ilaprazole and clopidogrel. Methods: A randomized crossover trial of 40 healthy subjects was performed. Clopidogrel was administered alone or in combination with ilaprazole for 7 days. The maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) to 5 µmol/L adenosine diphosphate was measured by light transmission aggregometry and the platelet reactivity index (PRI) was determined by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein P2Y12 assay. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HOPR) was defined as a MPA of >40%. The inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) and PRI in the two phases were compared between two regimens after the last dosing. Results: IPA was comparable between the two regimens at 0, 10 and 24 h (p > 0.05), but higher at 4 h in the clopidogrel alone regimen compared with that in the combined treatment regimen (75.66 ± 18.44% vs. 70.18 ± 17.67%, p = 0.031). The inhibition of PRI was comparable between the two regimens at 0 and 24 h. There were no significant differences in the area under the time-IPA% curve (AUC) or the incidence of HOPR at all time-points between the two regimens. Conclusion: In healthy subjects, ilaprazole has limited effect on the pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel and it may not be clinically relevant. Clinical Trial Registration: [www.chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2000031482].

Impact of Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 rs956115 and CYP2C19 rs4244285 Genotypes on Clinical Outcome of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background Insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) rs956115 is associated with vascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease and concomitant diabetes. CYP2C19*2 (rs4244285) modulates clopidogrel response and predicts the outcome of coronary artery disease. This study was designed to explore the association between IRS-1, CYP2C19*2 genotypes, platelet reactivity, and 1-year outcome in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results Genotyping was performed using an improved multiplex ligation detection reaction technique. Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission aggregometry. Major adverse cardiovascular events were defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. A total of 2213 consecutive patients were screened and 1614 were recruited. At 1 month, patients with IRS-1 CG genotype had significantly lower levels of ADP-induced platelet aggregation compared with patients with CC homozygotes. Patients with IRS-1 CG or GG genotype had a 2.09-fold higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with those with CC homozygotes (95% CI, 1.04-4.19; P=0.0376). By comparison, patients with CYP2C19*2 GA or AA genotype had higher ADP-induced platelet aggregation compared with patients with GG homozygotes. Although there was no significant difference in risk of major adverse cardiovascular events between patients with GA/AA and GG genotypes, patients with GA genotype had a 2.19-fold higher risk than those with GG homozygotes (95% CI, 1.13-4.24; P=0.0200). No interaction between IRS-1 and CYP2C19*2 genotypes was observed. Conclusions In patients following percutaneous coronary intervention, IRS-1 GG/CG and CYP2C19*2 GA genotypes were associated with 2.09- and 2.19-fold increased cardiovascular risk, respectively, at 1-year follow-up. The association between IRS-1 genotypes and major adverse cardiovascular events appeared to be independent of known clinical predictors. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01968499.

Assessment of on-treatment platelet reactivity at high and low shear stress and platelet activation status after the addition of dipyridamole to aspirin in the early and late phases after TIA and ischaemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Data are limited on the ability of dipyridamole to additionally inhibit platelet function/reactivity in ischaemic cerebrovascular disease (CVD) patients on aspirin. AIMS: To assess inhibition of platelet function/reactivity and platelet activation with dipyridamole in CVD. METHODS: This prospective, observational study assessed TIA/ischaemic stroke patients before (baseline; N = 60), at 14 ±7 days (14d, N = 39) and ≥ 90 days (90d, N = 31) after adding dipyridamole to aspirin. Platelet function/reactivity at high shear stress (PFA-100® C-ADP) and low shear stress (VerifyNow® P2Y12 and Multiplate® ADP assays), and platelet activation status (% expression of CD62P, CD63 and leucocyte-platelet complexes on whole blood flow cytometry) were quantified. 'Dipyridamole-high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR)' was defined as failure to inhibit ADP-induced platelet aggregation +/- adhesion compared with the patient's baseline on aspirin monotherapy by more than twice the coefficient-of-variation of the assay after adding dipyridamole to aspirin. RESULTS: Dipyridamole-HTPR was identified in 71.4-75% of patients on PFA-100 C-ADP, 83.9-86.8% of patients on VerifyNow P2Y12, and 81.5-83.3% of patients on Multiplate ADP assays. There were no changes in CD62P/CD63 expression (P ≥ 0.18), or consistent changes in leucocyte-platelet complexes in CVD patients overall at 14d or 90d vs. baseline after commencing dipyridamole. Monocyte-platelet complexes increased in the patient subgroup with dipyridamole-HTPR at 14d and 90d on PFA-100, and at 14d on VerifyNow (P ≤ 0.04), but not in those without dipyridamole-HTPR. DISCUSSION: Additional antiplatelet effects of dipyridamole are detectable under high and low shear stress conditions with user-friendly platelet function/reactivity tests ex vivo. Increasing circulating monocyte-platelet complexes over time are associated with dipyridamole-HTPR.