'It's a job to be done'. Managing polypharmacy at home: A qualitative interview study exploring the experiences of older people living with frailty.

INTRODUCTION: Many older people live with both multiple long-term conditions and frailty; thus, they manage complex medicines regimens and are at heightened risk of the consequences of medicines errors. Research to enhance how people manage medicines has focused on adherence to regimens rather than on the wider skills necessary to safely manage medicines, and the older population living with frailty and managing multiple medicines at home has been under-explored. This study, therefore, examines in depth how older people with mild to moderate frailty manage their polypharmacy regimens at home. METHODS: Between June 2021 and February 2022, 32 patients aged 65 years or older with mild or moderate frailty and taking five or more medicines were recruited from 10 medical practices in the North of England, United Kingdom, and the CARE 75+ research cohort. Semi-structured interviews were conducted face to face, by telephone or online. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Five themes were developed: (1) Managing many medicines is a skilled job I didn't apply for; (2) Medicines keep me going, but what happened to my life?; (3) Managing medicines in an unclear system; (4) Support with medicines that makes my work easier; and (5) My medicines are familiar to me-there is nothing else I need (or want) to know. While navigating fragmented care, patients were expected to fit new medicines routines into their lives and keep on top of their medicines supply. Sometimes, they felt let down by a system that created new obstacles instead of supporting their complex daily work. CONCLUSION: Frail older patients, who are at heightened risk of the impact of medicines errors, are expected to perform complex work to safely self-manage multiple medicines at home. Such a workload needs to be acknowledged, and more needs to be done to prepare people in order to avoid harm from medicines. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: An older person managing multiple medicines at home was a core member of the research team. An advisory group of older patients and family members advised the study and was involved in the first stages of data analysis. This influenced how data were coded and themes shaped.

Rate of Polypharmacy and Its Determinants Among Older Adult Cardiovascular Patients at Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Eastern Ethiopia.

Background: Understanding the rate of polypharmacy in cardiovascular patients is crucial because of its increasing occurrence and its association with potentially inappropriate prescribing practices and negative health outcomes, particularly among elderly individuals with cardiovascular conditions. According to the best of the literature search knowledge, the magnitude of polypharmacy and associated factors were not known among older cardiovascular patients in eastern Ethiopia. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the rate of polypharmacy and its determinants among older adult cardiovascular patients at Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in eastern Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was undertaken, involving a cohort of 364 individuals aged 65 years and older who were receiving follow-up care for cardiovascular disease. A data abstraction sheet was used to gather the data. The convenience sampling technique was employed. To identify factors related to the rate of polypharmacy, multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed. Results: The analysis included the medical records of 325 patients, revealing a polypharmacy prevalence rate of 20.7%. Individuals who were 77 years of age or older had a 1.12 times higher likelihood of having polypharmacy than individuals who were 65 to 70 years old. The presence of comorbidities along with cardiovascular diseases was a significant factor related to polypharmacy. Polypharmacy was prevalent among individuals with a larger number of comorbidities. Conclusions: This study reported that 1 in 5 cardiovascular patients at a chronic care clinic experienced polypharmacy. Age (≥77 years), having comorbidities, number of comorbid diseases (≥3), duration of cardiovascular disease (≥5 years), and number of years taking cardiovascular drugs (≥5) were associated with higher odds of polypharmacy. Health care providers should be cautious about prescribing multiple medications to this population. Training in the prevention of inappropriate polypharmacy is crucial to reducing the trend of polypharmacy and its associated burden.

A need to integrate pharmacological management for multimorbidity into dementia guidelines in Australia.

Introduction: Pharmacological management is a vital aspect of dementia care. Suboptimal medication prescribing and adverse drug reactions are major causes for ongoing concerns for the quality of care. This review aims to investigate the existence and comprehensiveness of Australian guidelines dedicated to supporting dementia care in the context of pharmacological management. Methods: Guideline registries and databases (EMBASE and CINAHL) were searched to identify Australian guidelines addressing pharmacological management in dementia care and to uncover barriers and considerations associated with guideline implementation. Results: Seven Australian guidelines were identified. Barriers to effective implementation were identified at individual, provider, and system levels. None of the identified guidelines provided comprehensive guidance on management of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Discussion: Although Australian guidelines are available to guide pharmacological management in dementia, several barriers impede their effective implementation. There is an urgent need for updated guidelines that address the management of multimorbidity and polypharmacy in people living with dementia.

Association between polypharmacy and cognitive impairment in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis explored the relationship between polypharmacy and cognitive impairment in older adults. METHODS: We systematically searched for observational studies on polypharmacy and cognitive impairment in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL databases and performed meta-analysis to pool the study results using fixed- or random-effects models. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development, and Evaluation system. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies involving 124,452,121 older adults aged >60 years were included. These studies showed that the risk of cognitive impairment was significantly increased in older adults with polypharmacy (≥5 medications) (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.23-1.58, P < 0.001) and in those with excessive polypharmacy (≥10 medications) (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.01-2.25, P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: This study suggests a potential association between polypharmacy and cognitive impairment in older adults. However, the causal relationship requires further verification.

Management of older adults with diabetes mellitus: Perspective from geriatric medicine.

Advances in diabetes medication and population aging are lengthening the lifespans of people with diabetes mellitus (DM). Older patients with diabetes mellitus often have multimorbidity and tend to have polypharmacy. In addition, diabetes mellitus is associated with frailty, functional decline, cognitive impairment, and geriatric syndrome. Although the numbers of patients with frailty, dementia, disability, and/or multimorbidity are increasing worldwide, the accumulated evidence on the safe and effective treatment of these populations remains insufficient. Older patients, especially those older than 75 years old, are often underrepresented in randomized controlled trials of various treatment effects, resulting in limited clinical evidence for this population. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the characteristics of older patients is essential to tailor management strategies to their needs. The clinical guidelines of several academic societies have begun to recognize the importance of relaxing glycemic control targets to prevent severe hypoglycemia and to maintain quality of life. However, glycemic control levels are thus far based on expert consensus rather than on robust clinical evidence. There is an urgent need for the personalized management of older adults with diabetes mellitus that considers their multimorbidity and function and strives to maintain a high quality of life through safe and effective medical treatment. Older adults with diabetes mellitus accompanied by frailty, functional decline, cognitive impairment, and multimorbidity require special management considerations and liaison with both carers and social resources.

Exacerbation of delirium and epileptic seizures in an older man with idiopathic Parkinson's disease due to multiple prescriptions: a case report.

Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a disorder characterized by motor symptoms, such as rigidity, akinesia, and resting tremor, as well as non-motor symptoms, including psychiatric manifestations and autonomic failure. The prevalence of PD increases with age, and the condition is more common in men than in women. Conversely, polypharmacy has emerged as a paramount medical concern, especially among older patients, correlating with medicines' adverse effects, interactions between medicines, frequent admissions to the hospital, and a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Case description: We encountered an older male patient with idiopathic PD and mild renal dysfunction. Originally prescribed 14 types of medicines, including anti-PD drugs, the patient developed delirium and epileptic seizures during hospitalization. After reducing the number of medications, including amantadine, the symptoms significantly improved. This clinical course suggests that polypharmacy, in addition to PD itself, poses a significant risk of delirium and epileptic seizures, even in patients with mild renal dysfunction. Conclusion: This report is indicative of the risk of polypharmacy and highlights the importance of citing drug interactions for a correct diagnosis in patients presenting with complex symptoms.

Potentially inappropriate medication use before and after admission to internal medicine for older patients and polypharmacy.

BACKGROUND: With the aging of the population and the increase in chronic diseases, there is an inherent risk of polypharmacy and inappropriate medication use. The study aimed to determine the prevalence and incidence of potentially inappropriate medication use and its correlation with polypharmacy. METHODS: A retrospective, population-based cohort study among patients ≥65 years hospitalized at The National University Hospital of Iceland from 2010-2020. Data on medication usage were retrieved from the National Prescription Medicine Registry. Based on the number of medications filled in in the year prior to admission and post-discharge, participants were categorized non-polypharmacy (<5), polypharmacy (5-9), and hyper-polypharmacy (≥10). The prevalence and incidence of potentially inappropriate medication use was assessed based on the 2019 Beers criteria. Regression models were used to correlate sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacoepidemiologic variables and the odds of new potentially inappropriate medication use. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 55,859 patients (48.5% male) with a median [IQR] age of 80 [73-86] years. The prevalence of inappropriate medication use in the year preceding admission was 34.0%, 77.7%, and 96.4% for patients with non-polypharmacy, polypharmacy, and hyper-polypharmacy. The incidence of new potentially inappropriate medication use was 46.7% (95% CI 45.6%-47.6%) among those with no potentially inappropriate medication use pre-admission. Factors associated with higher odds of new potentially inappropriate medication use after discharge were the use of multi-dose dispensing services, dementia, polypharmacy, and hyper-polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: An increased emphasis is needed to review and reevaluate the appropriateness of medication use among older population in internal medicine. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05756400.

A descriptive analysis of drug-drug interactions and corresponding adverse drug reactions in multimorbid older inpatients: findings from the SENATOR trial.

PURPOSE: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are prevalent among multimorbid and polymedicated older adults and can increase the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), hospital admissions, and mortality. This study describes the incidence and prevalence of 66 clinically relevant DDIs and analyses the occurrence of 12 corresponding predefined ADRs in older inpatients enrolled in the SENATOR trial. METHODS: The sub-study of the SENATOR trial that involved 1537 multimorbid older inpatients, recruited from 2016 to 2018 in six academic teaching hospitals in Belgium, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Scotland, and Spain respectively, and analysed 66 potentially clinically significant DDIs. Descriptive analysis determined DDI and corresponding ADR prevalence/incidence. RESULTS: At baseline (median age: 78 [72, 84], 52.8% male), the prevalence of patients with DDIs was high (50.9%), increased during hospitalisation (55.2%) and reduced to 49.7% after 12 weeks. The most common DDIs were: ≥ 2 potassium reducing drugs (17.1%), ≥ 3 centrally acting drugs (9.0%), and SSRI + loop/thiazide diuretic (7.2%). Of all participants, one-third experienced a prevalent (36.6%)/incident (35.8%) ADR. Major serum electrolyte disturbance had the highest incidence (10.7%)/prevalence (11.5%). Incident ADRs were more common in patients with DDIs (p = 0.013). A higher prevalence of new onset falls (p = 0.013), major constipation (p = 0.004), and major serum electrolyte disturbances (p = 0.006) was observed in patients with related and thus potentially causal DDIs. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should, be aware of DDIs and the involved drug classes that can lead to an increased rate of ADRs in older multimorbid inpatients. Regularly reevaluating the appropriateness of the frequently prescribed drug classes and initiating judicious deprescribing is recommended.

A retrospective study examining the association between polypharmacy and complications after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is an escalating public health concern across various healthcare settings worldwide. We aimed to comprehensively investigate postoperative complications after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer and explore their association with polypharmacy. As laparoscopic surgery is widespread, clarifying the association between polypharmacy and postoperative complications is clinically important. METHODS: We retrospectively surveyed the medical charts of adult inpatients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer at Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital between April 2019 and March 2023. Postoperative complications were determined using the Clavien-Dindo classification. We explored the factors related to postoperative complications and calculated the cut-off values for the number of medication ingredients. RESULTS: Among the 236 patients, 32 (13.6%) developed postoperative complications. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the number of regularly used medication ingredients (odds ratio = 1.160, 95% confidence interval 1.050-1.270, p = 0.002) was identified as a factor related to postoperative complications. The identified cut-off value for complications was 10 ingredients. Patients using 10 or more ingredients had approximately 3.5 times higher occurrence of postoperative complications than those using fewer than 10 ingredients (33.3% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.001, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSIONS: Our study comprehensively investigated postoperative complications and examined their association with polypharmacy. We found that the number of regularly used medication ingredients may be linked to complications following laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. These findings have important implications for perioperative management and patient care, providing valuable insights that may influence clinical practices and enhance patient outcomes.

Polypharmacy to Clozapine Monotherapy in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

This case report discusses a 25-year-old Middle Eastern female with a 14-year history of schizophrenia, managed as an inpatient for nearly eight years. Initially referred to a psychiatrist at age 12, with one-year-long concerns about preoccupation with the idea of having a serious illness, depressed mood, decreased appetite, social withdrawal, and aggression, she underwent multiple admissions, various medication combinations, and electroconvulsive therapy but remained resistant to treatment until clozapine monotherapy was initiated in 2023. After starting clozapine, improvements were noted in speech, communication, and eye contact, though negative symptoms and bouts of aggression persisted. This case highlights the efficacy of clozapine monotherapy in managing treatment-resistant schizophrenia after years of ineffective polypharmacy treatment. The importance of clozapine in treating treatment-resistant schizophrenia cannot be understated. Despite its efficacy, clozapine is often underutilised globally due to concerns about adverse effects and the need for blood monitoring, leading to the overuse of antipsychotic polypharmacy. This polypharmacy is associated with higher adverse event rates, increased costs, and uncertain long-term safety. This case report demonstrates the successful management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia with clozapine monotherapy. The patient's significant improvement supports the need to prioritise clozapine, highlighting its benefits over polypharmacy and advocating for its broader use to enhance patient outcomes.

Polypharmacy and medication usage patterns in hypertensive patients: Findings from the Pars Cohort Study.

Polypharmacy, defined here as the concomitant use of five or more medications, is a significant health issue, particularly affecting individuals with chronic diseases like hypertension (HTN). To compare individuals with and without HTN in term of polypharmacy, and to investigate correlates of polypharmacy and medication use patterns in individuals with HTN in southwest Iran. This cross-sectional study used the baseline data of 9270 participants of the Pars Cohort Study (PCS) with a mean age of 52.6 ± 9.7 years. Poisson multivariable modeling was applied to identify correlates of polypharmacy, and Lexicomp® was used to assess drug-drug interactions. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification was used to describe the pattern of medication use. The prevalence of polypharmacy in individuals without hypertension was 4.7 % (4.2%-5.2 %) vs. 23.7 % (22.1%-25.3 %) in individuals with hypertension (P < 0.001). Individuals with hypertension from middle-high socioeconomic status (SES) had a 1.51-fold higher prevalence of polypharmacy than vs. low SES. Those with more than three comorbidities had a 5.18 times higher prevalence of polypharmacy than those with isolated hypertension. Calcium channel blockers were the most common antihypertensives (20.9 %). In terms of drug-drug interactions, type C interactions were most prevalent among participants with hypertension and polypharmacy (76.0 %). Our findings imply a fairly high prevalence of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions among individuals with hypertension; to tackle this issue, we recommend a national pharmacovigilance system, training programs for primary care physicians, public education and awareness campaigns, drug-checking campaigns, targeted screenings to alter modifiable risk factors, and the use of safe combination pills.

Mobile applications on app stores for deprescribing: A scoping review.

Deprescribing is an evidence-based intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate medication use. Yet its implementation faces barriers including inadequate resources, training and time. Mobile applications (apps) on app stores could address some barriers by offering educational content and interactive features for medication assessment and deprescribing guidance. A scoping review was undertaken to examine existing deprescribing apps, identifying features including interactive and artificial intelligence (AI) elements. A comprehensive search was conducted in August 2023 to identify mobile apps with deprescribing content within the Apple and Google Play Stores. The apps found were screened for inclusion, and data on their features were extracted. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Mobile App Rating Scale. Six deprescribing-related apps were identified: the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria 2023, Dementia Training Australia Medications, Evidence-Based Medicine Guide, Information Assessment Method Medical Guidelines, MedGPT-Medical AI App, and Polypharmacy: Manage Medicines. These apps focused primarily on educating both patients/carers and healthcare professionals about deprescribing. Amongst them, two apps included interactive features, with one incorporating AI technology. While these features allowed for search queries and input of patient-level details, the apps provided limited personalised deprescribing advice. In terms of quality, the apps scored highly on functionality and information, and poorly on engagement and aesthetics. This review found deprescribing apps, despite being educational, have limitations in personalization and user engagement. Future research should prioritize evaluating their feasibility and user experience in clinical settings, and further explore how AI and interactivity could enhance the usefulness of these apps for deprescribing practices.

Medication management in Danish home health care: Mapping of tasks and time consumption.

We aimed to map tasks related to medication management and time consumption in Danish home health care. Nursing staff (n = 30) from five municipalities were followed during a 10-week period and tasks related to medication management, time consumption and information on citizens' medication were registered. A total of 269 courses were registered, including 163 (61%) home visits, 76 (28%) in-office courses, 29 (11%) in-clinic courses and 1 (0.4%) acute visit. Of defined categories related to medication management, 'record-keeping and communication' (62%, n = 167), 'dispensing' (48%, n = 129) and 'identification' (30%, n = 81) were most often performed. During half of courses (55%, n = 147), the nursing staff was interrupted at least one time. The median time spent on medication management was less than the time allocated in most of allocated time slots (82%), with a median excess time of 5.1 min (range 0.02-24 min). Citizens (n = 32) used a median of 11 (interquartile range [IQR] 9-13) regular medications and 2 (IQR 1-4) as-needed, and 69% (n = 22) used high-risk situation medications. In conclusion, employees in Danish home health care perform diverse medication-related tasks and are frequently interrupted in their work. Employees spend less time than allocated but do not fully solve all tasks according to best practice guidance.

High prevalence of medication errors in a secondary-level Lithuanian hospital: A prospective cross-sectional observational study.

As the population continues to age, the occurrence of chronic illnesses and comorbidities that often necessitate the use of polypharmacy has been on the rise. Polypharmacy, among other factors that tend to coincide with chronic diseases, such as obesity, impaired kidney and liver function, and older age, can increase the risk of medication errors (MEs). Our study aims to evaluate the prevalence of MEs in the Internal medicine, Cardiology, and Neurology departments at the secondary-level university hospital. We conducted a prospective observational study of 145 patients' electronic or paper-based data of inpatient prescriptions and patients' pharmacokinetic risk factors, such as an impairment of renal and/or hepatic function, weight, and age. All included patients collectively received 1252 prescribed drugs. The median (Q1; Q3) number of drugs per patient was 8 (7;10). At least one ME was identified in 133 out of the 145 patients, indicating a significantly higher prevalence than hypothesized (91.7% vs. 50%; p < .001). There was moderate, positive correlation between the quantity of prescribed drugs and the number of MEs, meaning that the more drugs are prescribed, the higher the number of identified MEs (Spearman's ρ = 0.428; p < .001). These findings suggest that there is a need for continuous medication education activity for prescribing physicians, continuous evaluation of prescription appropriateness to objectively identify the MEs and to contribute to more rational patient treatment.

Identifying Malnutrition Risk in the Elderly: A Single- and Multi-Parameter Approach.

Malnutrition is a significant concern affecting the elderly, necessitating a complex assessment. This study aims to deepen the understanding of factors associated with the assessment of malnutrition in the elderly by comparing single- and multi-parameter approaches. In this cross-sectional study, 154 individuals underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Malnutrition risk was determined using the mini nutritional assessment (MNA). Additional factors assessed included sarcopenia, polypharmacy, depression, appetite, handgrip strength, and gait speed. Phase angle (PA) and body composition were measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The MNA identified a malnutrition risk in 36.8% of individuals. The geriatric depression scale (GDS) and PA demonstrated moderate effectiveness in assessing malnutrition risk, with AUC values of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.60-0.78) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.72), respectively. A logistic regression model incorporating handgrip strength, skeletal muscle mass, sarcopenia, osteoporosis, depression, specific antidepressant use, mobility, appetite, and smoking achieved superior performance in predicting malnutrition risk, with an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.91). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that integrating multiple parameters into a composite model provides a more accurate and comprehensive assessment of malnutrition risk in elderly adults.

Nurses' responses to patients' medication self-management problems in hospital and the use of recommendations.

This study aimed to describe the use of recommendations as a guide for healthcare providers to support patients experiencing medication self-management problems and to evaluate their feasibility, user-friendliness and usefulness. Between March and August 2023, 58 hospitalized patients completed a self-assessment on medication self-management problems. The problems addressed in this self-assessment were based on a list of frequently encountered medication self-management problems from previous research. Consequently, 18 nurses responded to the reported problems using the recommendations. Nurses evaluated the feasibility, user-friendliness and usefulness of these recommendations through a survey. A total of 217 medication self-management problems were reported by 58 patients. Nurses intervened in 52% of the problems using the recommendations. According to nurses, the recommendations were user-friendly and feasible but required a substantial time investment. Considering these pilot-based results, the recommendations have the potential to be a valuable resource for nurses in practice, though this potential requires further exploration.

Trends in polypharmacy among U.S. adults with asthma, 2001-2020.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate trends in polypharmacy prevalence among adults with asthma in the United States. METHODS: Data from the 2001-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used to estimate the weighted prevalence of polypharmacy. Joinpoint regression analysis was conducted to evaluate trends in polypharmacy. Trends were first evaluated overall and then stratified by asthma severity and asthma control. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with polypharmacy. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2020, a stable trend in polypharmacy among U.S. adults with asthma was observed (average annual percent change [AAPC] = 1.02, P = 0.71). Trends across different asthma severity were stable (mild asthma: AAPC = 2.93, P = 0.20; moderate asthma: AAPC= -2.22, P = 0.35; severe asthma: AAPC = 0.45, P = 0.82). Trends in adults with good asthma control and those with poor control stayed constant (good control: AAPC = 0.82, P = 0.68; poor control: AAPC= -1.22, P = 0.82). Several factors, including older age, females, Non-Hispanic Black, health insurance coverage, family income, number of healthcare visits, former smokers, multi-morbidities, asthma severity, and asthma control, were associated with polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy prevalence has remained constant among U.S. adults with asthma over the past two decades. Despite a stable overall trend, disparities in polypharmacy prevalence persist across different asthma severities and control statuses, underscoring the need for tailored medication management to improve asthma care.

Potentially inappropriate medication on communitydwelling older adults: Longitudinal analysis using the International Mobility in Aging Study. / Medicación potencialmente inapropiada en adultos mayores de la comunidad: análisis longitudinal del estudio IMIAS

Introduction: Medications are a fundamental part of the treatment of multiple pathologies. However, despite their benefits, some are considered potentially inappropriate medications for older people given their safety profile. Epidemiological data differences related to potentially inappropriate medications make it difficult to determine their effects on elderly people. Objective: To estimate the prevalence and types of potentially inappropriate medications using the 2019 Beers Criteria® in a cohort of adults older than 65 years. Materials and methods: We performed an observational, multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal study of a four-year follow-up of potentially inappropriate medications in community-dwelling older adults. Results: We followed 820 participants from five cities for four years (2012-2016) and evaluated them in three different moments (m1 = 2012, m2 = 2014, and m3 = 2016). The average age was 69.07 years, and 50.9% were women. The potentially inappropriate medication prevalence in the participants was 40.24%. The potentially inappropriate medications' mean among the studied subjects in the first moment was 1.65 (SD = 0.963), in the second was 1.73 (SD = 1.032), and in the third was 1.62 (SD = 0.915). There were no statistical differences between measurements (Friedman test, value = 0.204). The most frequent potentially inappropriate medications categories were gastrointestinal (39.4%), analgesics (18.8%), delirium-related drugs (15.4%), benzodiazepines (15.2%), and cardiovascular (14.2%). Conclusions: About half of the population of the community-dwelling older adults had prescriptions of potentially inappropriate medications in a sustained manner and without significant variability over time. Mainly potentially inappropriate medications were gastrointestinal and cardiovascular drugs, analgesics, delirium-related drugs, and benzodiazepines.

Introducción. Los fármacos son parte fundamental del tratamiento de múltiples enfermedades. Sin embargo, a pesar de sus beneficios, algunos se consideran medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados en adultos mayores, dado su perfil de seguridad. Las diferencias en los datos epidemiológicos relacionados con los medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados dificultan el establecimiento de sus efectos en adultos mayores. Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia longitudinal y los tipos de medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados, utilizando los criterios Beers® del 2019 en una cohorte de adultos mayores de 65 años. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un estudio observacional, multicéntrico, retrospectivo y longitudinal, de cuatro años de seguimiento de los medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados en adultos mayores de la comunidad. Resultados. Se evaluaron 820 participantes de cinco ciudades durante cuatro años (2012 a 2016) en tres momentos (m1: 2012, m2: 2014 y m3; 2016). La edad promedio fue de 69,07 años y el 50,9 % eran mujeres. La prevalencia de medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados en los participantes fue del 40,24 %. El promedio de estos medicamentos entre los sujetos estudiados en el primer momento fue de 1,65 (DE = 0,963), en el segundo fue de 1,73 (DE = 1,032) y en el tercero fue de 1,62 (DE = 0,915). No hubo diferencias estadísticas entre las mediciones (prueba de Friedman, p = 0,204). Las categorías de los medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados más frecuentes fueron: gastrointestinales (39,4 %), analgésicos (18,8 %), relacionados con delirium (15,4 %), benzodiacepinas (15,2 %) y cardiovasculares (14,2 %). Conclusiones. En cerca de la mitad de la población de adultos mayores de la comunidad, se prescribieron medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados de manera sostenida y sin variabilidad importante en el tiempo. Los más recetados fueron aquellos para tratar malestares gastrointestinales y cardiovasculares, analgésicos, para el delirium y benzodiacepinas.

[Dose adjustment according to renal function in a polymedicated patient included in the medication reconditioning service using medication compliance aids (MCA)]. / Ajuste de dosis según función renal en una paciente polimedicada incluida en el servicio de reacondicionamiento de medicamentos utilizando sistemas personalizados de dosificación (SPD).

78-year-old patient, polymedicated and enrolled in the medication compliance aids service. When she went to pick up her medication, she informed us that for a few months she has been suffering from fatigue, weakness, dizziness and confusion. A medication review is performed, focused on the dosage of renal metabolism or elimination medications, based on the patient's estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). A referral was made to the Primary Care Physician (PCP) through a report, in which the dose reduction of losartan and manidipine was recommended according to the patient's eGFR. The PCP reduced the dose of antihypertensives. A follow-up of the case was carried out, which allowed to observe that the patient stopped presenting the symptoms initially described.

[The review of the treatment of a very complex patient easily finds areas for improvement. Case report]. / La revisión del tratamiento de un paciente muy complejo fácilmente encuentra aspectos mejorables. A propósito de un caso.

Case presentation: A 100-year-old male presented with an episode of profound bradycardia. The patient's carer alerted the emergency department and they withdrew the bisoprolol and controlled the bradycardia. Once the problem was resolved, we were asked if any of his medications could be related to the bradycardia. Assessment and evaluation: On reviewing all the patient's treatment, which is very complex, we cannot establish a clear relationship between any of his 19 drugs and the bradycardia, except for the bisoprolol already withdrawn, but we found 6 other problems that we tried to solve. Results: Of the 6 proposed changes, 3 are accepted. Final comment: The review of a complex treatment will probably allow us to detect some aspects that could be improved.