The experience of social alienation in elderly lung cancer patients: A Qualitative Study.

PURPOSE: To understand the experience of social alienation in elderly lung cancer patients, to explore its causes, and to propose targeted intervention strategies. METHODS: From July to August 2023, 16 elderly lung cancer patients attending the respiratory department of a tertiary hospital in Changsha City, Hunan Province, were selected for semi-structured interviews using a purposive sampling method. The Colaizzi 7-step method was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of four themes were distilled: the experience of social alienation in elderly lung cancer patients (pessimistic feelings, inferiority complex, and heavy psychological burden), subjective causes (disease-included shame, avoidant social behavior, and stigmatized labels), objective causes (isolated social states, and reduced amount of socialization), and rehabilitation support. CONCLUSION: The causes of social alienation in elderly lung cancer patients include multiple aspects of personal, family, and social support, and symptom management and psychological guidance should be strengthened for this population to construct a hospital-society-family triple linkage care program to help patients recover.

Experiences of children with bronchiectasis and their parents in a novel play-based therapeutic exercise programme: a qualitative analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences and perceptions of children with bronchiectasis and their parents regarding an 8-week play-based therapeutic exercise programme. DESIGN: Qualitative study with inductive content analysis. SETTING: Individual semistructured interviews were conducted. Interview recordings were transcribed verbatim, and coding was guided by the content. Content categories were established via consensus moderation. PARTICIPANTS: 10 parents and 10 children with bronchiectasis aged 5-12 years. RESULTS: From the perspective of children, the most important components of the programme were fun with friends and being active at home as a family. Parents valued the community-based sessions, perceived the programme to be engaging and motivating. Parents perceived improvements in their child's endurance, coordination and physical activity level. They described the home programme as fun but noted that finding time was difficult. Both parents and children thought that in-person exercise sessions would be better than exercise sessions delivered online. CONCLUSIONS: Children who participated in the play-based exercise programme, found it fun, motivating and accessible. Parents perceived positive impacts on fitness, coordination and physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial was registered with, Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ACTRN12619001008112).

Perceptions of C-reactive Protein Measurement Among General Physicians: A Qualitative Study on Diagnostic Value, Clinical Dilemmas, and Professional Growth.

Introduction C-reactive protein (CRP) is a widely used laboratory test for assessing infections, inflammatory diseases, and malignancies, playing a critical role in clinical diagnosis and management. Despite its utility, CRP measurement practices vary among physicians, often influenced by training and clinical experience. This study explores general physicians' perceptions of CRP measurement in clinical practice, focusing on its diagnostic value, associated dilemmas, and impact on clinical growth and decision-making. Methods This qualitative study employed thematic analysis to examine the perceptions of general physicians at Unnan City Hospital, Unnan, Japan regarding CRP measurement. Sixteen general physicians were selected through purposive sampling and participated in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. The interviews were conducted in Japanese, recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively to identify themes. The analysis involved iterative coding and extensive discussion among the research team to ensure the reliability and validity of the findings. Results Three main themes emerged from the analysis: the usefulness of CRP for diagnosis and collaboration, dilemmas associated with CRP usage, and clinical growth through reconsideration of CRP's importance. Physicians highlighted CRP's value in distinguishing inflammatory from non-inflammatory diseases, predicting clinical courses, and facilitating communication with specialists. However, dilemmas arose from discrepancies between CRP levels and clinical symptoms, the influence of various non-specific factors, and habitual testing driven by training, leading to unnecessary tests and diminished clinical skills. Participants recognized the need to view CRP as one of many diagnostic tools, cultivate a habit of questioning its necessity, and reflect on its use to enhance clinical reasoning and professional growth. Conclusions CRP measurement is a valuable diagnostic tool, but effective use requires a balanced and critical approach. Discrepancies between CRP levels and clinical symptoms can lead to over-reliance on laboratory results and unnecessary testing. General physicians should integrate CRP within a broader diagnostic framework, combining it with patient history, physical examination, and other tests. Reflecting on the necessity and implications of CRP measurements can improve clinical reasoning and decision-making, ultimately enhancing patient care and resource management. Future research should explore similar perceptions in diverse healthcare settings and develop strategies to optimize CRP use in clinical practice.

Children With Cerebral Palsy's Experiences With Adaptive Climbing: A Qualitative Study on Parents' Perspectives.

Background: Interest in adaptive sports for children with cerebral palsy (CP) is growing, but current evidence on the benefits and indications for one sport, adaptive climbing, is limited. Purpose: We sought to describe perceived changes observed by parents of children with CP who participated in adaptive climbing. Methods: Parents whose children with CP participated in 5 or more adaptive climbing sessions were eligible to participate and were emailed a recruitment letter and flyer. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, using a moderator guide. Interviews were transcribed and content analyzed, with data grouped into concepts, categories, and themes until data saturation. Results: Ten parents (9 mothers, 1 father) of 10 children with CP (5 girls, 5 boys; ages 7 to 19 years) were interviewed for 15 to 45 minutes each, yielding 4 themes. First, parents perceived that adaptive climbing challenged the children physically (in reach, balance, strength, and head/neck and lower limb motion); second, that it sharpened children's cognitive skills (in focus, problem-solving, and strategic thinking); third, that it raised children's confidence (socially, physically, and emotionally); and fourth, that it expanded children's sense of what they could do (in mastering a challenge, claiming an athletic identity, and participating in a sport like their peers). Conclusions: In this qualitative study, parents described physical, cognitive, and psychosocial benefits of adaptive climbing for their children with CP. These descriptions can be used to inform future studies of children with CP who participate in adaptive climbing.

Exploring the life experiences of school-aged children afflicted by tethered spinal cord syndrome: An interpretative qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Children affected by tethered cord syndrome (TCS) encounter multifaceted challenges encompassing educational, familial and social spheres, underscoring the significance of a holistic comprehension of their subjective emotional well-being and life encounters. Nonetheless, healthcare professionals tend to prioritise the physical functionality of the afflicted individuals throughout the treatment and rehabilitation process, often neglecting the emotional experiences and requirements of these children as they transition into posthospitalization phases. AIM: To advance the subjective experiences and perceptions of children with TCS upon reintegration into their families, educational institutions and wider societal contexts subsequent to their discharge from medical facilities. METHODS: The study was conducted at the Children's Hospital in Zhejiang. Twelve children aged 8-15 with TCS were included in the study. The research design used an interpretative qualitative approach, utilising semi-structured interviews as the primary data collection method. Data analysis was performed using reflexive thematic analysis, facilitating a comprehensive exploration of emerging themes and patterns. RESULTS: Four major themes (and seven subthemes) were identified from the findings: (1) growing pains (a shameful secret, distance between ideal and reality); (2) inappropriate expressions of familial affection (knowing is not understanding, unspeakable guilt); (3) social estrangement (uncomfortable distinctions, familiar stranger) and (4) striving for independence and consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Children affected by TCS exhibit internal sensitivity and challenges in self-development, family dynamics and social interactions. They aspire to attain a future characterised by independence and freedom, akin to that of their typically developing peers. These findings can help health professionals, families and educators gain a deeper understanding of what it takes to be a child with TCS, and the findings can also serve as a platform for interventions that seek to promote self-expression in these children so that they can experience life as a meaningful and positive process. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study received support from children with TCS and their guardians during data collection, as well as from the head nurse of the unit. Coresearchers also contributed to design, data collection, analysis and writing.

Patient experiences and desires for recovery after ankle fracture surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates patients' experiences of commencing weight-bearing after ankle fracture surgery and their recovery priorities to inform a new rehabilitation intervention. METHODS: Embedded within the Weight bearing in Ankle Fractures (WAX) trial, this qualitative study conducted semi-structured interviews with patients following ankle fracture surgery. The Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework guided the interview questions to ensure comprehensive domain coverage. A purposive, maximum variation sampling strategy was used for participant selection. Data analysis employed a combined deductive and inductive approach. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were interviewed, revealing five key themes: understanding the recovery journey, navigating the healthcare system, understanding personal physical capabilities, building confidence for weight-bearing, and resuming daily activities. Themes emphasised the variability in healthcare access, the impact of non-weight-bearing on independence, and the role of self-efficacy in recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the diversity in patient experiences and recovery challenges post-ankle fracture surgery. Patients' recovery was influenced by access to consistent healthcare advice, self-efficacy, and the physical and psychological impact of non-weight-bearing. The findings suggest a need for tailored, patient-centred rehabilitation interventions that consider individual recovery trajectories and promote self-management. These insights provide a foundational understanding for developing interventions that more effectively address patient priorities and barriers to recovery.

Examining the Building Blocks of Health Behavior Change in Rheumatology Rehabilitation: A Theory-Driven Qualitative Study.

Purpose: To identify and describe behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in rehabilitation for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), according to their own perceptions. Further, to examine patients' descriptions of their capability, opportunity, motivation, and readiness for health behavior change. Patients and Methods: Patients were adults in need of specialized, multidisciplinary rehabilitation services due to inflammatory rheumatic disease, systemic connective tissue disease, or fibromyalgia / chronic widespread pain. Semi-structured interviews of 21 patients were analyzed with deductive qualitative content analysis applying three theoretical frameworks: the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy, the transtheoretical model and stages of change, and the capability, opportunity, and motivation model of behavior. Results: Forty-six BCTs aggregated within 14 BCT groups were identified used by either patients, healthcare professionals (HPs), or both. Goals and planning, feedback and monitoring, social support, shaping knowledge, repetition and substitution were most frequently used to facilitate behavior change. Twenty patients had reached the action stage and made specific lifestyle changes concerning more than half of their goals. Concerning other goals, 6 of these patients reported to be contemplating behavior change and 15 to be preparing for it. The rehabilitation process appeared to strengthen capability, opportunity, motivation, and the desired behaviors. Patient-reported barriers to behavior change were connected with restrictions in physical capability resulting from an unpredictable and fluctuating disease course, weakened motivation, and contextual factors, such as lack of access to healthcare support and training facilities, and high domestic care burden. Conclusion: The rehabilitation process seemed to strengthen individual and contextual prerequisites for behavior change and facilitate the use of required techniques and engagement in the desired behaviors. However, patients with RMDs may need prolonged support from HPs to integrate healthy lifestyle changes into everyday life. The findings can be used to optimize rehabilitation interventions and patients' persistent engagement in healthy behaviors.

Qualitative exploration of uterine cancer care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ+) patients in the UK: shifting from equality to equity.

OBJECTIVE: Patients identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and/or queer/questioning (LGBTQ+) report significant disparities in cancer care and are disproportionally affected by a cancer diagnosis on a number of health-related indicators. This study aimed to explore uterine cancer (UC) care from the perspectives of LGBTQ+ patients and stakeholders, to identify this population's care needs, which have been underprioritised thus far. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Qualitative interview data were collected from three cohorts of participants: LGBTQ+ UC patients, partners of UC patients and stakeholders who provide advocacy and/or support within the UC care pathway, including healthcare professionals (HCPs). Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted and data were analysed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen participants (three patients, one partner, eight HCPs and three cancer support charity representatives) were recruited. Data analysis identified themes which represented participants' reflections on the relevance and opportunities for identity disclosure during the diagnostic pathway; feelings and implications of not fitting into the gynaecological cancer environment and, opportunities and challenges surrounding HCP education, and protocolled sexual and gender identity data collection. CONCLUSION: UC patients who identify as LGBTQ+ have specific care needs and considerations, particularly related to transvaginal procedures and survivorship. Opportunities for disclosure of patients' LGBTQ+ identity during the UC care pathway are essential for these needs to be recognised. Despite this, there are conflicting agendas between HCPs and stakeholders on the best approach to integrate disclosure processes. The current findings highlight the need for public health agendas and clinical services to address the needs of LGBTQ+ UC patients.

Understanding the impact of distance and disadvantage on lung cancer care and outcomes: a study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK and the leading cause of cancer mortality globally. NHS England guidance for optimum lung cancer care recommends management and treatment by a specialist team, with experts concentrated in one place, providing access to specialised diagnostic and treatment facilities. However, the complex and rapidly evolving diagnostic and treatment pathways for lung cancer, together with workforce limitations, make achieving this challenging. This place-based, behavioural science-informed qualitative study aims to explore how person-related characteristics interact with a person's location relative to specialist services to impact their engagement with the optimal lung pathway, and to compare and contrast experiences in rural, coastal, and urban communities. This study also aims to generate translatable evidence to inform the evidence-based design of a patient engagement intervention to improve lung cancer patients' and informal carers' participation in and experience of the lung cancer care pathway. METHODS: A qualitative cross-sectional interview study with people diagnosed with lung cancer < 6 months before recruitment (in receipt of surgery, radical radiotherapy, or living with advanced disease) and their informal carers. Participants will be recruited purposively from Barts Health NHS Trust and United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trusts to ensure a diverse sample across urban and rural settings. Semi-structured interviews will explore factors affecting individuals' capability, opportunity, and motivation to engage with their recommended diagnostic and treatment pathway. A framework approach, informed by the COM-B model, will be used to thematically analyse facilitators and barriers to patient engagement. DISCUSSION: The study aligns with the current policy priority to ensure that people with cancer, no matter where they live, can access the best quality treatments and care. The evidence generated will be used to ensure that lung cancer services are developed to meet the needs of rural, coastal, and urban communities. The findings will inform the development of an intervention to support patient engagement with their recommended lung cancer pathway. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The study received NHS Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 23/SC/0255) and NHS Health Research Authority (IRAS ID 328531) approval on 04/08/2023. The study was prospectively registered on Open Science Framework (16/10/2023; https://osf.io/njq48 ).

Lived experiences of pregnant women with cancer in South Korea: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: The incidence of cancer during pregnancy is increasing, presenting several challenges to the treatment of cancer in pregnant women. However, research focusing on the lived experiences of pregnant women with cancer in South Korea is limited. This study aimed to explore and describe the day-to-day lived experiences of women diagnosed with or treated for cancer during pregnancy and their husbands. METHODS: The study employed a qualitative descriptive design and utilized purposive sampling to recruit participants. The participants comprised six women living in Korea diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy and one husband of a female participant. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted, audiotaped, and transcribed. Five of the participants agreed to a second interview, resulting in a total of 12 individual interviews. A thematic analysis was then performed. The participants' ages ranged from 31 to 40 years, and their diagnoses during pregnancy were either breast or thyroid cancer. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified: (1) Participants faced various heart-breaking difficulties maintaining their pregnancies throughout cancer treatment; (2) Pregnant women with cancer experienced complex but responsible feelings toward their children; (3) Patients with cancer also fulfilled their roles as parents even with their own diseases; and (4) Family support had a significant impact on the pregnant women to overcome the path. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the lived experiences of being diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy. A recommended strategy is to develop a nursing education program for the pregnant women with cancer to provide necessary information and support, and to help them cope positively with their situation.

Improving sustainability of a patient decision aid for systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A qualitative study.

Objective: To improve sustainability of a patient decision aid for systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, we evaluated real-world experiences and identified ways to optimize decision aid content and future implementation. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with patients and medical oncologists addressed two main subjects: user experience and decision aid content. Content analysis was applied. Fifteen experts discussed the results and devised improvements based on experience and literature review. Results: Thirteen users were interviewed. They confirmed the relevance of the decision aid for shared decision making. Areas for improvement of content concerned; 1) outdated and missing information, 2) an imbalance in presentation of treatment benefits and harms, and 3) medical oncologists' expressed preference for a more center-specific or patient individualized decision aid, presenting a selection of the guideline recommended treatment options. Key points for improvement of implementation were better alignment within the care pathway, and clear instruction to users. Conclusion: We identified relevant opportunities for improvement of an existing decision aid and developed an updated version and accompanying implementation strategy accordingly. Innovation: This paper outlines an approach for continued decision aid and implementation strategy development which will add to sustainability. Implementation success of the improved decision aid is currently being studied in a multi-center mixed-methods implementation study.

Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review.

An integral part of understanding and then designing programs to reduce childhood cancer inequities includes adequate representation of people with cancer in research, including children. A scoping review was carried out to understand how cancer research is oriented toward inequities and to identify who has participated in childhood qualitative cancer research. A systematic search identified 119 qualitative studies that met inclusion criteria, with most studies taking place in high-income countries (n=84). Overall, data were lacking on social determinants of health at multiple levels-structural, household, child, and guardian. Only 29 studies reported on race and/or ethnicity, with the majority of those including predominantly or all white children. Six articles included socioeconomic information, and across most articles, attention was absent to the financial ramifications of cancer care. Limited reporting of sociodemographics highlights a broader issue of neglecting key demographics and social factors that contribute to inequities.

Challenges in collecting information on sexual orientation and gender identity for cancer patients: perspectives of hospital and central cancer registry abstractors.

PURPOSE: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations experience cancer treatment and survival disparities; however, inconsistent sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection within clinical settings and the cancer surveillance system precludes population-based research toward health equity for this population. This qualitative study examined how hospital and central registry abstractors receive and interact with SOGI information and the challenges that they face in doing so. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 abstractors at five Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries, as well as seven abstractors from commission on cancer (CoC)-accredited hospital programs in Iowa. Interviews were transcribed, cleaned, and coded using a combination of a priori and emergent codes. These codes were then used to conduct a descriptive analysis and to identify domains across the interviews. RESULTS: Interviews revealed that abstractors had difficulty locating SOGI information in the medical record: this information was largely never recorded, and when included, was inconsistently/not uniformly located in the medical record. On occasion, abstractors reported situational recording of SOGI information when relevant to the patient's cancer diagnosis. Abstractors further noticed that, where reported, the source of SOGI information (i.e., patient, physician) is largely unknown. CONCLUSION: Efforts are needed to ensure standardized implementation of the collection of SOGI variables within the clinical setting, such that this information can be collected by the central cancer registry system to support population-based equity research addressing LGBTQ + disparities.

Meaning in life after cancer: Validation of the sources of meaning card method among participants in cancer rehabilitation.

Cancer survivors may be struggling to re-create meaning in life. Addressing their personal sources of meaning can support them in this process. The sources of meaning card method (SoMeCaM) aims to map and explore personal sources of meaning in a 1-h session. It includes 26 cards, each with a statement on a source of meaning. The purpose of this study was to validate the statements on the sources of meaning cards for use among participants in cancer rehabilitation by examining whether participants attribute the same meaning to the statements as intended. The three step test interview method was used to assess response processes to the sources of meaning cards among 12 participants in a 5-day cancer rehabilitation program in Denmark. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using framework analysis. Nineteen of the 26 statements were interpreted congruently, that is, in line with the underlying theory, by all participants. Issues of incongruency, ambiguity and confusion were observed in participants' interpretations of the statements on religiosity (n = 6), spirituality (n = 10), and reason (n = 6). Minor issues were observed for the statements on practicality, achievement, knowledge, and attentiveness. In most statements, cancer survivors' interpretation aligned with the underlying theory. Problems were apparent regarding the sources of meaning religiosity, spirituality and reason, and a reconsideration of the wording of the statements is recommended. These problems may be due to cultural and linguistic interpretations rather than to being a cancer survivor. Future studies could focus on these issues in other target populations. Despite these minor issues, the SoMeCaM has proven useful in addressing the important topic of meaning in life in the cancer rehabilitation setting. Clinicians should pay attention to nuances in participants' understanding of the cards.

"Living with a question mark": psychosocial experience of Portuguese young adults at risk for hereditary amyloid transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.

This study is the first to explore the psychosocial experience of young Portuguese adults at genetic risk for hereditary amyloid transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (hATTR-PN). The work focuses on the developmental peculiarities of their experience with the disease. Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with young adults coming for pre-symptomatic testing (PST) at a single genetics outpatient center in Portugal. The data were analyzed qualitatively. The main findings suggest that four themes mark the psychosocial experience of the young adults interviewed. The first refers to the development of psychological representations, namely beliefs, mental representations, and social perceptions about hATTR-PN. The second regards the experienced and anticipated psychosocial impacts, namely, suffering, anxiety, and relief related to the disease. The third is related to using strategies such as performing PST, strategies focused on emotional regulation and the meaning of hATTR-PN, and social strategies to deal with these impacts over time. Finally, the fourth aspect concerns the perceived and expected support for the participants' needs provided by social contexts, that is, family and genetic counseling. In a period of life also marked by qualitatively different characteristics and developmental tasks from other life cycle stages (e.g., identity explorations, instability, and independent decision-making), experience with the disease can add psychosocial challenges to young adults at risk for hATTR-PN. Genetic counseling practices and health policies can be optimized to respond to the psychosocial needs of young adults. Future research should deepen the understanding of the psychosocial experience of individuals and families with late-onset hATTR-PN to improve the clinical response in this population.

The impact of mindfulness-based interventions on the experiences of cancer patients: A qualitative meta-synthesis.

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed qualitative research to explore cancer patients' perspectives on MBIs, including benefits, challenges, and recommendations. METHODS: This systematic review focused on synthesizing qualitative data and was registered with PROSPERO under the protocol registration number xxx. Searched 7 databases for qualitative studies on MBIs & cancer patients (17 studies, 365 patients). Analyzed data using themes & assessed confidence in findings. RESULTS: Thematic analysis using NVivo software revealed four significant themes: (1) benefits and positive outcomes (e.g., symptom improvement, team support, positive experiences), (2) challenges and difficulties (e.g., practice challenges, negative experiences), (3) the journey of change and acceptance (e.g., shifts in perception, personal growth, and acceptance), and (4) adaptations and recommendations (e.g., program modification and flexibility). CONCLUSION: Mindfulness-based interventions have the potential to offer cancer patients positive emotional experiences, increased team support, and opportunities for personal growth, self-discovery, and acceptance. This, in turn, can help them manage the psychological distress associated with cancer. Customizing programs to align with individual patients' needs and preferences can enhance engagement and effectiveness. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Integrating MBIs into Patient Education and Counseling, tailored to individual needs and with ongoing support, can enhance cancer care. Group interventions foster peer support and effectiveness. Training providers and ensuring accessibility are crucial. Research and customization to patients' journeys optimize outcomes and satisfaction. A patient-centered approach is essential for positive experiences and improved clinical outcomes.

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of rapid HIV testing in Canadian Emergency Departments: a mixed methods study.

OBJECTIVES: 1 in 7 Canadians with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) do not know their status. Patients at increased risk of HIV routinely access the emergency department (ED), yet few are tested, representing a missed opportunity for diagnosis and linkage-to-care. Rapid HIV testing provides reliable results within the same ED encounter but is not routinely implemented. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to rapid HIV testing in Ontario EDs. METHODS: We employed a mixed-methods, convergent, parallel design study including online surveys and semi-structured interviews of physicians, nurses, and allied health across four hospitals in Toronto and Thunder Bay, Ontario. Data were analyzed in equal priority using descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data guided by the Theoretical Domains framework and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation Behaviour change model. RESULTS: Among 187 survey respondents, 150 (80%) felt implementing rapid HIV testing would be helpful in the ED. Facilitators included availability of resources to link patients to care after testing (71%), testing early in patient encounters (41%), and having dedicated staff with lived experience support testing (34%). Motivation to offer testing included opportunities to support an underserved population (66%). Challenges to implementation included limited time during ED patient encounters (51%) and a lack of knowledge around HIV testing (42%) including stigma. Interview themes confirmed education, and integration of people with lived experience being essential to provide rapid HIV testing and linkage-to-care in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of rapid HIV testing in the ED is perceived to be important irrespective of practice location or profession. Intrinsic motivations to support underserved populations and providing linkage-to-care are novel insights to facilitate testing in the ED. Streamlined implementation, including clear testing guidelines and improved access to follow-up care, is felt to be necessary for implementation.

ABSTRAIT: OBJECTIFS: 1 Canadien sur 7 atteint du virus de l'immunodéficience humaine (VIH) ne connaît pas son statut. Les patients présentant un risque accru de contracter le VIH ont régulièrement accès au service des urgences (SU), mais peu d'entre eux sont testés, ce qui représente une occasion manquée de diagnostic et de lien avec les soins. Le dépistage rapide du VIH fournit des résultats fiables dans la même situation d'urgence, mais n'est pas systématiquement mis en œuvre. L'objectif de cette étude était d'identifier les obstacles et les facilitateurs au dépistage rapide du VIH dans les urgences de l'Ontario. MéTHODES: Nous avons utilisé une étude de conception mixte, convergente et parallèle, y compris des sondages en ligne et des entrevues semi-structurées auprès de médecins, d'infirmières et d'auxiliaires de la santé dans quatre hôpitaux de Toronto et de Thunder Bay, en Ontario. Les données ont été analysées en priorité égale à l'aide de statistiques descriptives pour les données quantitatives et d'analyses thématiques pour les données qualitatives guidées par le cadre des domaines théoriques et le modèle de changement de capacité, d'opportunité et de motivation. RéSULTATS: Parmi 187 répondants au sondage, 150 (80 %) étaient d'avis que la mise en œuvre d'un dépistage rapide du VIH serait utile à l'urgence. Les facilitateurs comprenaient la disponibilité de ressources pour lier les patients aux soins après le test (71 %), le dépistage précoce lors des rencontres avec les patients (41 %) et la présence d'un personnel dévoué avec des tests de soutien de l'expérience vécue (34 %). La motivation à offrir des tests comprenait des occasions de soutenir une population mal desservie (66 %). Les difficultés de mise en œuvre comprenaient un temps limité pendant les rencontres avec les patients aux urgences (51 %) et un manque de connaissances sur le dépistage du VIH (42 %), y compris la stigmatisation. Les thèmes des entrevues ont confirmé que l'éducation et l'intégration des personnes ayant une expérience vécue sont essentielles pour fournir un dépistage rapide du VIH et un lien avec les soins aux urgences. CONCLUSIONS: La mise en œuvre du dépistage rapide du VIH aux urgences est perçue comme importante, quel que soit le lieu de pratique ou la profession. Les motivations intrinsèques à soutenir les populations mal desservies et à fournir un lien avec les soins sont de nouvelles idées pour faciliter les tests à l'urgence. Une mise en œuvre simplifiée, y compris des lignes directrices claires sur les tests et un meilleur accès aux soins de suivi, est jugée nécessaire pour la mise en œuvre.

Social support resources in adolescents and young adults with advanced cancer: a qualitative analysis.

PURPOSE: Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with cancer are an at-risk group with unique palliative and supportive care needs. Social support in AYAs with cancer is associated with better coping, quality of life, and psychosocial well-being. Here, we extend existing research to examine the sources and types of support received by AYAs with advanced cancer. METHODS: AYAs participated in a semi-structured, 1:1 interview on communication and psychosocial support needs. The present analysis focused on social support experiences for AYAs with advanced cancer. Directed content analysis was used to develop the codebook. Established social support constructs provided a coding framework. We presented our qualitative findings as a code frequency report with quantified frequency counts of all "source of support" and "type of support" codes. We assigned a global "sufficiency of support code" to each AYA. RESULTS: We interviewed 32 AYAs with advanced cancer (Mage = 18, SDage = 3.2, 41% female). Most AYAs identified family (namely, caregivers) as their primary source of support and stated that family universally provided all types of support: emotional, informational, instrumental, and social companionship. They received informational and emotional support from clinicians, and received emotional support and social companionship from healthy peers, cancer peers, and their existing community. One-third of participants were coded as having "mixed support" and described a lack of support in some domains. CONCLUSION: AYAs with advanced cancer described caregivers as their universal source of support, and that other support sources provided support for specific needs. Future research should continue to evaluate social support needs and family-based palliative and supportive care interventions to bolster social support resources in this high-risk group.

The Impact of Structural and Meso-Level Factors on Caregiver Coping Abilities When Supporting a Child with Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Family caregivers of children diagnosed with cancer often experience periods of significant stress. We provide an in-depth examination of the impacts of structural (health care and leave policies) and meso-level (organizations and communities/social networks) factors on caregiver coping during childhood cancer treatment. We conducted a secondary analysis of a comprehensive qualitative dataset examining the impacts of structural and meso-level factors on caregiver coping from in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 49 caregivers representing 38 unique cases of childhood cancer. Using a modified grounded theory approach, transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Caregivers experienced multiple and often intersecting structural and meso-level factors, both facilitating and impeding their ability to cope during their child's cancer treatment. Our analysis revealed the following themes: having few out-of-pocket medical expenses, access to paid time off from employment, and support from one's health system, organizations, or community/social networks fostered caregiver coping. Significant financial burdens due to cancer treatment, having to take unpaid leave from employment, remaining employed regardless of one's circumstances, and lack of support from one's health system, organizations, or community/social networks hindered caregiver coping. Our findings point to several policies that may ease caregiver burden and facilitate caregiver coping during childhood cancer treatment.

Multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer in France: The SINPATIC qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Health policymakers have tried to improve the care pathway for cancer patients by improving collaboration between participating healthcare professionals by involving the general practitioner (GP). OBJECTIVE(S): To explore how patients, GPs, oncologists and nurses interacted and how they perceived, in their practice, professional roles, collaboration, and cancer care pathways. METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2021, we conducted a qualitative study that combined phenomenology and a general inductive analysis, based on semi-structured interviews with cancer patients and their GPs, oncologists, and nurses in France. RESULTS: Our analysis of 59 interviews showed that the stakeholders had different perceptions of the cancer care pathway. Task division was implicit and depended on what each health professional thought he/she should be doing; this led to the blurring of certain tasks (announcement of the diagnosis, coordination, and follow-up). The healthcare professionals were stuck in frameworks centred on their own needs and expectations and were unaware of the other health professionals' needs and expectations. Outside the hospital, GPs and nurses worked in isolation; they were not aware of the other stakeholders and did not communicate with them. GPs and nurses justified this attitude by the lack of a perceived need. Interprofessional communication varied as a function of the needs, involvement and knowledge of the other health professionals and was often mediated by the patient. CONCLUSION: In the cancer management in France, to improve cancer care pathway, there is a need to train healthcare professionals in interprofessional collaboration delivering care tailored to patient needs and preferences.

In the management of patients with cancer, the division of tasks between health professionals was not clear and was not discussed by the group.Communication within the health professionals was mediated often by the patient.Interprofessional collaboration is strongly encouraged by France's public health policies but was not mentioned or put into practice by the health professionals.