Safety and efficacy of thermo-expandable metallic stent in ureteral stricture following gynecological malignancy surgery and radiotherapy: a single center experience with 33 cases.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of metallic stents in treating ureteral strictures following surgery and radiotherapy for gynecological tumors is currently uncertain. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of thermo-expandable metallic stent (Memokath) in the treatment of ureteral stricture after radiotherapy for gynecological tumors. METHODS: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 27 patients with ureteral stricture were treated with Memokath stent after gynecological tumor radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy that was admitted to our hospital from August 2021 to August 2023. Clinical data on efficacy, safety, and complications during stent insertion and indwelling were analyzed. RESULTS: The successful insertion of thirty-three stents in twenty-seven patients studied. The stenosis length was 10.14 ± 6.76 cm, and the hospitalization was 4.43 ± 1.83 days. One patient has died from the primary disease carrying a patency stent. The Kaplan-Meier graph showed that the cumilative patency rate of patients with thermo-expandable metallic stent were 92.4% (SD = 5.2%) in eight months, 77.4% (9.1%) in 12 months and 67.7% (SD = 12%) in 29 months, while the cumilative survival rate was 87.5% (SD = 11.5%) in 29 months. The stent patency was 81.48% and later complications of stent indwelling were 5/27, including refractory urinary tract infection (UTI) in three cases, stent migration, and stent intolerance respectively. The creatinine levels, hydronephrosis degree, and glomerular filtration rate improved after the operation, and the first two indicators were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Memokath stent is a safe and effective treatment for ureteral stricture after surgery and radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for gynecological tumors.

Landscape of C-MET overexpression in non-small cell lung cancer: a large-scale study of clinicomolecular features and prognosis based on Chinese data.

Background: Real-world data on C-MET protein overexpression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, particularly among the Asian Chinese population, are limited. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinicomolecular characteristics and prognosis of C-MET overexpression in Chinese NSCLC patients, focusing on those with positive C-MET overexpression (immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+). Design: A retrospective and observational study. Methods: Data were collected from NSCLC patients diagnosed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between November 2006 and April 2021. We identified C-MET overexpression using IHC and C-MET overexpression positivity was defined as IHC 3+ with ⩾50% tumor cells. Additionally, patient genotypes were collected for subgroup analysis. Results: Data from 9785 NSCLC patients were collected. C-MET (-) accounted for 5% (503/9785), C-MET (+) for 27% (2654/9785), C-MET (++) for 36% (3464/9785), and C-MET (+++) for 32% (3164/9785). Genetic testing was available for 4326 patients. Wild-type was observed in 37% (1591 cases), with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) abnormalities being the most common at 49% (2127 cases). Positive C-MET overexpression correlated significantly with women (p < 0.001), early-stage (p = 0.003), adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001), and driver mutations (p < 0.001). Patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations had a higher occurrence of C-MET overexpression positivity (57.1%). Positive C-MET overexpression was significantly associated with EGFR (p < 0.001), ALK (p < 0.001), and KRAS alterations (p = 0.024). Compared to C-MET overexpression (IHC 0), C-MET overexpression (IHC 2+) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.455, p < 0.001) and C-MET overexpression (IHC 3+) (HR = 0.569, p < 0.001) were correlated with better overall survival in overall NSCLC patients, especially for C-MET overexpression (IHC 2+). Conclusion: Our study elucidates the clinicomolecular characteristics and prognosis of C-MET overexpression in NSCLC patients, particularly those with positive C-MET overexpression (IHC 3+). This provides insight into the prevalence of C-MET overexpression in Chinese NSCLC patients and offers a basis for considering C-MET overexpression as a prognostic and predictive marker in NSCLC.

Real-world study on the application of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in video-assisted thoracoscopic day surgery for pulmonary nodule resection.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of applying different levels of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines to video-assisted thoracic day surgery (VATS). The goal is to determine the optimal degree of ERAS protocols and management requirements to improve postoperative recovery outcomes. METHODS: It was designed as a single-centre, prospective pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PRCT), including patients who underwent VATS at the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital, between January 2021 and November 2022. Patients were divided into Group A and Group B through convenience sampling to implement different levels of ERAS management protocols. Data collection included the baseline characteristics (gender, age, marital status, education level, BMI, PONV risk score, ASA classification), surgery-related indicators (type of surgery, pathological results, hospitalization costs, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative rehydration volume), postoperative recovery indicators (postoperative chest tube duration time, time to first postoperative ambulation and urination, postoperative complications, follow-up condition), pain-related indicators (pain threshold score, pain score at 6 h postoperatively, bedtime, and predischarge), psychological state indicators (anxiety level), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) scores, and social support scores. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized and statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.4.1. Comparisons of categorical variables were performed using the χ² test, while comparisons of continuous variables were conducted using ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test. A significance level of α = 0.05 was set for statistical tests. RESULT: A total of 340 patients were included, with 187 in Group A and 153 in Group B. After propensity score matching (PSM), there were 142 patients in Group A and 105 in Group B, with no significant baseline differences. Group A had a significantly higher proportion of chest tube removals within 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.001) and earlier mobilization (P < 0.001). Despite a higher pain threshold in Group A (P = 0.016), their postoperative pain scores were not higher than those in Group B. Additionally, Group A had a lower incidence of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The more comprehensive ERAS protocol significantly improved postoperative recovery, confirming its value in day-case VATS and supporting its clinical adoption. However, the study has limitations; future research should focus on standardizing ERAS protocols and expanding their application to a broader patient population to validate these findings further. TRAIL REGISTRATION: This study underwent review by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University under No. 2020 (1001). It has been officially registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry, TRN: ChiCTR2100051372 and registration date is Sept. 22, 2021.

Post-marketing safety of tralokinumab: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Tralokinumab is a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting IL-13, used for treating atopic dermatitis. This study analyzed tralokinumab-related adverse drug events by mining the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to provide a safety reference for clinical application. METHODS: Adverse drug event reports from Q1 2022 to Q2 2024 were extracted from the FAERS database. After standardizing the data, various signal detection methods were used for analysis, including ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS. RESULTS: A total of 1,820 reports of adverse events (AEs) with tralokinumab as the primary suspected drug were identified. 70 preferred terms (PTs) met the criteria across four signal detection methods, involving 11 system organ classes (SOCs). These included known adverse reactions like conjunctivitis and injection site reactions, and signals not previously reported in clinical trials, such as eye pruritus, dry eye, eye swelling, pneumonia pneumococcal, and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Most AEs occurred within one month of initiating tralokinumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the FAERS database, this study comprehensively and systematically analyzed AE signals in tralokinumab treatment. The results enhance the understanding of tralokinumab's safety and serve as valuable references for reducing the risk of adverse reactions during clinical use.

Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib/cetuximab with or without binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: an AGEO real-world multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of encorafenib with cetuximab has become the standard of care in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after a prior systemic therapy. This study aims to describe the efficacy and safety of encorafenib/cetuximab +/- binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC who received this combination from January 2020 to June 2022 in 30 centers. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were included, with 55% of women, a median age of 62 years, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) >1 in 20% of cases. The main tumor characteristics were 60% of right-sided primary tumor, 11% of microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficient phenotype, and liver and peritoneum being the two main metastatic sites (57% and 51%). Encorafenib/cetuximab +/- binimetinib was prescribed in the first, second, third, and beyond third line in 4%, 56%, 29%, and 11%, respectively, of cases, with the encorafenib/cetuximab/binimetinib combination for 21 patients (10%). With encorafenib/cetuximab treatment, 21% of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), with each type of grade ≥3 AE observed in <5% of patients. The objective response rate was 32.2% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-5.4 months] and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.2 months (95% CI 7.8-10.8 months). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with a shorter PFS were synchronous metastases [hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, P = 0.04] and ECOG-PS >1 (HR 1.88, P = 0.007), and those associated with a shorter OS were the same factors (HR 1.71, P = 0.03 and HR 2.36, P < 0.001, respectively) in addition to treatment beyond the second line (HR 1.74, P = 0.003) and high carcinoembryonic antigen level (HR 1.72, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This real-world study showed that in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC treated with encorafenib/cetuximab +/- binimetinib, efficacy and safety data confirm those reported in the BEACON registration trial. The main poor prognostic factors for this treatment are synchronous metastases and ECOG-PS >1.

Long-term experience with octreotide and lanreotide for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

INTRODUCTION: The somatostatin analogs (SSA) octreotide and lanreotide are a mainstay in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NET). The two pivotal trials differed considerably in terms of patient characteristics and are not directly comparable. Further comparative data are lacking. METHODS: This retrospective chart review study included patients with gastroenteropancreatic NET grade 1 or 2 who were treated with octreotide LAR or lanreotide autogel. The main aim was to compare the two SSA based on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from treatment start. RESULTS: In total, 129 patients were analyzed, 60% (n = 77) had a small intestinal NET and 31% (n = 40) a pancreatic NET. Histologically, 34% (n = 44) had NET G1, 55% (n = 71) a NET G2, and 11% (n = 14) a NET G1/G2 unclassified. Lanreotide was used in 90 patients (70%) and octreotide in 39 patients (30%). Overall, the median PFS was 32.2 months (95% CI 23.0-42.9 months). No PFS difference (p = 0.8) was observed between lanreotide (29.8 months, 95% CI 18.7-48.5 months) and octreotide (36.0 months, 95% CI 23.2-68.2 months). Median OS from treatment start was calculated at 93.5 months (95% CI 71.1-132.9 months). Again, the median OS following lanreotide (113.4 months, 95% CI 62.3-NA months) or after octreotide (90.3 months, 95% CI 71.1-NA months) did not differ significantly (p > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Our long-term experience with octreotide and lanreotide in NET did not reveal differences in antitumor effectiveness. This is consistent with previous reports and might suggest that both SSA can be used interchangeably if needed.

Sacituzumab Govitecan for Second and Subsequent Line Palliative Treatment of Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Polish Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is approved for patients with previously treated metastatic or locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as per the ASCENT trial results. Real-world studies (RWSs) cover more diverse patients than clinical trials, offering crucial data for healthcare policies. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of SG in real-world Polish patients with previously treated metastatic TNBC. METHODS: In this ambispective multicenter cohort study, we collected demographic and clinical data. Premedication, adjustments in SG dosage, and treatment regimen adhered to the product's characteristics. RESULTS: We included 79 female patients. The median age at SG initiation was 53 years; 32% of patients were initially diagnosed with a non-TNBC subtype. The median number of previous palliative lines was 2. Seven patients presented with brain metastases. The median overall survival was 10.3 months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months. The overall response rate was 35%, with a median time to response of 2 months. SG was discontinued by 70% of patients, primarily due to disease progression (95%). Treatment delays due to adverse events (AEs) occurred in 67% and dose reductions in 25% of patients, with neutropenia being the most common. Grade ≥ 2 AEs included neutropenia (43%), anemia (10.1%), and diarrhea (4%). A longer interval between breast cancer diagnosis and SG initiation or between metastasis diagnosis and SG initiation correlated with improved PFS, likely reflecting the disease's biological aggressiveness rather than treatment efficacy. CONCLUSION: In this RWS, SG demonstrated effectiveness and safety in patients with previously treated metastatic TNBC, consistent with ASCENT trial outcomes. Further research is needed to explore the efficacy of SG in different patient populations and healthcare systems.

Inetetamab-based therapy in real-world treatment patterns with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study.

Background: Inetetamab is a novel antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) developed in China. Due to its optimized antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity effect compared with trastuzumab, it has shown good efficacy and safety in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of inetetamab combination therapy in the treatment of HER2-positive ABC in real-world clinical practice. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: A total of 133 patients with HER2-positive ABC who were treated with inetetamab-based regimens between March 2020 and January 2024 were retrospectively included in this study. The main endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results: The study included 133 HER2-positive ABC patients, and the median age was 55 years. The mPFS was 8.0 (6.7-9.3) months. The ORR was 50.4%, while the DCR was 88.7%. The mPFS for patients receiving inetetamab-based therapy as first to second, third to fourth, and later lines of metastatic treatment were 14.0, 7.0, and 6.0 months, respectively. Patients treated with inetetamab plus pyrotinib plus chemotherapy, especially with capecitabine, had the best outcomes (mPFS = 14.0 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that prior HER2-TKI treatment was significantly associated with worse PFS (hazard ratios 2.829, 95% confidence interval 1.265-6.328, p = 0.011). Subgroup analysis indicated that patients without visceral metastases had significantly better PFS (14.0 months vs 8.0 months, p = 0.003). The overall incidence of any grade adverse events (AEs) was 100%, with most being grades 1-2. Severe complications included neutropenia (37.6%) and leukopenia (33.1%). Conclusions: Inetetamab-based combination therapy shows promising efficacy and good safety in patients with HER2-positive ABC. It is one of the late-line treatment options for Chinese patients with HER2-positive ABC.

[A multicenter retrospective study discussion on maintenance treatment strategies for mantle cell lymphoma].

Objective: This study aims to explore the survival advantages of different maintenance strategies for MCL. Methods: Clinical data of 693 newly diagnosed MCL patients in multi-centers admitted from April 1999 to December 2019 were collected. 309 cases received maintenance treatment. The characteristics of patients in different maintenance treatment groups were summarized and Kaplan-Meier survival and prognosis analysis were conducted. Results: The overall 3-year and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were (73.5±2.9) % and (53.6±4.3) %, respectively. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were (94.2±1.5) % and (82.7±3.2) %, respectively. The clinical features of different maintenance treatment groups were generally consistent. The 3-year PFS rates of rituximab maintenance, lenalidomide maintenance, BTK inhibitor maintenance and dual-drug maintenance were (70.4±4.1) %, (69.1±7.6) %, (86.9±5.0) %, and (80.4±5.1) %, respectively. Corresponding 3-year OS rates were (92.9±2.4) %, (97.3±2.7) %, (97.9±2.1) %, and (95.3±2.7) %, respectively. There were no significant difference in different groups (P=0.632, 0.313). Survival analysis identified the MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) high-risk group and achieving complete remission before maintenance treatment as independent risk factors for PFS. The MIPI high-risk group, high-dose cytarabine application, treatment lines, and early disease progression (POD24) emerged as independent risk factors for OS. Conclusion: Comparing the different maintenance strategies of MCL, the result showed that BTK inhibitors (BTKi) maintenance demonstrated preliminary advantages in survival. Meanwhile, high-risk group according to MIPI and incomplete remission before maintenance treatment were significant factors related to disease progression.

Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes Among Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor-Experienced Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is limited real-world data regarding subsequent treatment utilization and clinical outcomes following initial androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) exposure for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. This study aimed to address this evidence gap. METHODS: Electronic health records during 01/01/2013-07/31/2022 from Flatiron Health were used to identify adults with mCRPC, who had prior exposure to ARPIs (irrespective of the setting) and ≥1 post-ARPI line of therapy (LOT) in the mCRPC setting (index therapy: the first eligible LOT in the mCRPC setting). Treatment patterns and survival outcomes following the initiation of index therapy were reported. RESULTS: Among 804 ARPI-experienced mCRPC patients, 459 patients (57.1%) received another ARPI as their index therapy and 192 (23.9%) received chemotherapy as their index therapy. In the overall population, median time on the index therapy and median time from index therapy to next therapy were 4.1 and 6.2 months, respectively. Median overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival from the initiation of index therapy were 15.1 and 7.0 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world analysis, more than half of patients attempted at least 1 additional ARPI in the mCRPC setting, despite prior treatment with ARPIs. The short treatment duration and survival time highlight the unmet need for additional, effective therapies that may improve clinical outcomes in this population.

Assessment of Cardiovascular Events Caused by New-Generation Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors Used for Prostate Cancer: A Real-World Study in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) that significantly improve the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer include abiraterone acetate (androgen synthesis inhibitor) and enzalutamide (androgen receptor inhibitor). A recent analysis of ARPI and cardiovascular events using the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) has been reported; however, the evidence on cardiovascular events for abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide in real-world clinical practice is insufficient. Using a large Japanese database of medical institutions, the Japanese Medical Data Center (JMDC) medical institution database (JMDC Inc., Tokyo, Japan), this study tested the hypothesis that the risk of cardiovascular events with enzalutamide is lower than that with abiraterone acetate. METHOD: Using the JMDC medical institution database, patients with new use of abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide who had not experienced a major cardiovascular event between October 2014 and February 2022 were included. After adjusting for age, comorbidities, and concomitant medications using propensity score matching, cumulative incidence rates were compared for cardiovascular death and all cardiovascular events as the primary endpoints, and major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke as secondary endpoints. RESULT: A total of 3,033 patients in the enzalutamide group and 2,021 in the abiraterone group met the eligibility criteria. After propensity score matching, the cohort included 1,940 patients in the enzalutamide group and 1,940 patients in the abiraterone group. Enzalutamide was associated with significantly lower cumulative rates of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.93), all cardiovascular events (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98), major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.97), and myocardial infarction (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.84) compared to abiraterone. CONCLUSION: In a national sample of males with prostate cancer, those newly treated with enzalutamide had a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular events than those treated with abiraterone acetate.

CAR-T therapy pulmonary adverse event profile: a pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database (2017-2023).

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, a rapidly emerging treatment for cancer that has gained momentum since its approval by the FDA in 2017, involves the genetic engineering of patients' T cells to target tumors. Although significant therapeutic benefits have been observed, life-threatening adverse pulmonary events have been reported. Methods: Using SAS 9.4 with MedDRA 26.1, we retrospectively analyzed data from the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from 2017 to 2023. The analysis included the Reporting Odds Ratio Proportional Reporting Ratio Information Component and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean to assess the association between CAR-T cell therapy and adverse pulmonary events (PAEs). Results: The FAERS database recorded 9,400 adverse events (AEs) pertaining to CAR-T therapies, of which 940 (10%) were PAEs. Among these CAR-T cell-related AEs, hypoxia was the most frequently reported (344 cases), followed by respiratory failure (127 cases). Notably, different CAR-T cell treatments demonstrated varying degrees of association with PAEs. Specifically, Tisa-cel was associated with severe events including respiratory failure and hypoxia, whereas Axi-cel was strongly correlated with both hypoxia and tachypnea. Additionally, other CAR-T therapies, namely, Brexu-cel, Liso-cel, Ide-cel, and Cilta-cel, have also been linked to distinct PAEs. Notably, the majority of these PAEs occurred within the first 30 days post-treatment. The fatality rates varied among the different CAR-T therapies, with Tisa-cel exhibiting the highest fatality rate (43.6%), followed by Ide-cel (18.8%). Conclusion: This study comprehensively analyzed the PAEs reported in the FAERS database among recipients of CAR-T cell therapy, revealing conditions such as hypoxia, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, and atelectasis. These CAR-T cell therapy-associated events are clinically significant and merit the attention of clinicians and researchers.

Efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in patients with RET fusion positive non-small cell lung cancer: An observational real world study.

BACKGROUND: Pralsetinib, a selective RET targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been approved for treating locally advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC in adults who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy in China. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis conducted at Hunan Cancer Hospital in China, we examined 36 patients with advanced NSCLC with RET fusion, who were treated with pralsetinib between January 2021 and December 2023. The study focused on assessing the efficacy (Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) and safety profile of pralsetinib in these patients. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.0, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The results revealed that pralsetinib exhibited significant activity in this patient cohort. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a median PFS of 10.7 months and a median OS of 21.2 months. The overall response rate(ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 55.6 % and 72.2 %, respectively. Pralsetinib was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being mild to moderate (grades 1-2). The most common serious adverse events (≥grade 3) observed were lymphopenia (13.9 %), hypertension (11.1 %), leukopenia (8.3 %), neutropenia (8.3 %), and creatine kinase elevation (8.3 %). CONCLUSION: Pralsetinib demonstrated promising activity in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring RET fusion with a favorable safety profile.

A two-stage maintenance trial of cetuximab-based treatment in RAS and BRAF wild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective real-world study.

Background: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of maintenance regimens based on cetuximab, we conducted a real-world, single-arm, retrospective study at a single center. Methods: In Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who received cetuximab-based maintenance therapy between December 2020 and December 2021 were included. All patients had RAS and BRAF wild-type. The maintenance regimen consisted of 6-12 cycles of cetuximab plus irinotecan (Phase 1) and cetuximab (Phase 2). Patients could receive reintroduction therapy in case of disease progression during Phase 2. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety data were collected. Results: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study, a total of 108 subjects who received maintenance therapy were included- 51 experienced disease progression during Phase 1, with PFS (1) of 7.3 months. Among the 52 patients who entered Phase 2, 17 were still in this phase at the end of follow-up, with PFS (2) of 10.1 months. In Phase 2, 35 patients experienced disease progression, of whom 24 received reintroduction therapy, with PFS (3) of 6.7 months. The overall PFS (total) during the maintenance period was 11.9 months, and the OS was 39.2 months. Grade III or higher adverse events were 4.6% during Phase 1 and 0% during Phase 2. Conclusion: Innovative cetuximab-based maintenance therapy showed a trend toward improving the prognosis of mCRC patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type, while the toxic side effects of maintenance therapy were manageable. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2000040940.

An Economic Evaluation of Family-Based Versus Traditional Helicobacter pylori Screen-and-Treat Strategy: Based on Real-World Data and Microsimulation Model.

OBJECTIVE: There is an economic evaluation on the family-based Helicobacter pylori screen-and-treat strategy (FBHS) in China. This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of the FBHS with the traditional H. pylori screen-and-treat strategy (TBHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A seven-state microsimulation model, including H. pylori infection and gastric cancer states, was constructed on the basis of the target family samples from 29 provinces in China. Taking a lifetime horizon from a healthcare system perspective, the long-term costs and health outcomes of the FBHS and TBHS screening strategies were simulated separately, and economic evaluations were performed. The model parameters were primarily derived from real-world data, published literature, and expert opinions. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as cost/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. One-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and scenario analysis were performed to assess the uncertainty of the results. RESULTS: The base-case analysis revealed that the average costs for FBHS and TBHS were 563.67 CNY and 574.08 CNY, respectively, with corresponding average QALYs of 14.83 and 14.79. The ICER for the comparison between the two strategies was -214.07, indicating that FBHS was an absolutely dominant strategy with better cost-effectiveness. The results of both one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were robust. When taking into account the added benefit of the higher H. pylori eradication rate in FBHS, the average costs were further reduced, and the average QALYs were increased, solidifying its position as an unequivocally dominant strategy. CONCLUSION: The FBHS is an absolutely dominant and cost-effective strategy that enables an optimized allocation of screening resources. Decision-makers should prioritize FBHS when developing H. pylori prevention and control strategies.

Maintenance therapy for cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma: landscape in the era of novel drugs.

Although the significant strides in novel therapeutic approaches have prolonged the survival of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, the unfavorable prognosis of cytogenetically high-risk newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) remains intractable with the lack of consensus regarding the choice of maintenance regimens. Therefore, this study was initiated with the aim of examining the effectiveness of various maintenance treatments for this group of patients in jeopardy. Overall, 17 studies with 1937 high-risk NDMM patients were included in the network meta-analysis. Combination therapies involving novel drugs presented encouraging prospects in the maintenance phase, while the patients and circumstances for the application of different regimens still needed to be further distinguished and clarified. To investigate the current status of maintenance therapy of high-risk NDMM patients in clinical practice, a real-world cohort of high-risk NDMM was retrospectively incorporated 80 patients with lenalidomide maintenance and 53 patients with bortezomib maintenance, presenting the median PFS of 31.7 months and 30.4 months, respectively (p = 0.874, HR = 0.966, 95% CI: 0.628-1.486). Collectively, this study illuminated the present constraints of conventional approaches during the maintenance phase for high-risk NDMM patients while highlighting the future potential associated with enhanced regimens integrating novel medications.

Optimizing treatment sequence for inoperable locally advanced breast cancer: Long-term outcomes of surgery first versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a real-world setting.

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is challenging with limited treatment options. This study investigates the feasibility and long-term outcomes of upfront surgery compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in a real-world cohort. This retrospective study analyzed 243 inoperable LABC patients (excluding T3N1M0) that underwent upfront surgery (n = 187) or NAC (n = 56) in matched groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) are primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included NAC response rate and subgroup analyses based on age, tumor stage, and treatment response. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank tests for comparisons. Cox proportional hazards models were used for subgroup analyses. With a median follow-up of 60.9 months, no significant difference emerged in 5-year OS (upfront surgery: 89.6%, NAC: 81.9%, p = .12) or 5-year DFS rates (73.0% vs. 67.1%, p = .24). Subgroup analyses revealed upfront surgery offered significantly better OS for patients under 60 (HR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.10-0.96; p = .0429) and stage IIIA disease (HR = 0.22; CI: 0.06-0.86; p = .03). Upfront surgery showed a trend towards improved OS for tumors under 5 cm (HR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.13-1.03; p = .056). Patients with progressive disease (PD) or stable disease (SD) after NAC had significantly worse DFS (HR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.09-0.79; p = .017) and OS (HR = 0.09; 95% CI: 0.02-0.48; p = .004) compared to responders. Upfront surgery may be viable for LABC patients, particularly younger patients, those with stage IIIA disease, or smaller tumors. NAC response can inform treatment decisions. These findings highlight the need for personalized LABC treatment considering patient characteristics and NAC response.

Cost analysis of radical resection of malignant breast tumors under the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups payment system.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women worldwide and poses a severe threat to their health. Therefore, this study examined patients who underwent breast cancer surgery, analyzed hospitalization costs and structure, and explored the impact of China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups (CHS-DRG) management on patient costs. It aimed to provide medical institutions with ways to reduce costs, optimize cost structures, reduce patient burden, and improve service efficiency. AIM: To study the CHS-DRG payment system's impact on breast cancer surgery costs. METHODS: Using the CHS-DRG (version 1.1) grouping criteria, 4073 patients, who underwent the radical resection of breast malignant tumors from January to December 2023, were included in the JA29 group; 1028 patients were part of the CHS-DRG payment system, unlike the rest. Through an independent sample t-test, the length of hospital stay as well as total hospitalization, medicine and consumables, medical, nursing, medical technology, and management expenses were compared. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test the cost correlation. RESULTS: In terms of hospitalization expenses, patients in the CHS-DRG payment group had lower medical, nursing, and management expenses than those in the diagnosis-related group (DRG) non-payment group. For patients in the DRG payment group, the factors affecting the total hospitalization cost, in descending order of relevance, were medicine and consumable costs, consumable costs, medicine costs, medical costs, medical technology costs, management costs, nursing costs, and length of hospital stay. For patients in the DRG non-payment group, the factors affecting the total hospitalization expenses in descending order of relevance were medicines and consumable expenses, consumable expenses, medical technology expenses, the cost of medicines, medical expenses, nursing expenses, length of hospital stay, and management expenses. CONCLUSION: The CHS-DRG system can help control and reduce unnecessary medical expenses by controlling medicine costs, medical consumable costs, and the length of hospital stay while ensuring medical safety.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with CLL using the Australian pharmaceutical benefits scheme (PBS) dataset.

This real-world retrospective cohort study using Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10% investigated changes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment by line of therapy, time-to-next-treatment, treatment duration, and overall survival (OS). Overall, 803 patients received their first PBS-reimbursed CLL medication between 1 January 2011 to 31 July 2021 (median age: 70 years; 64.6% male), 289 post-1 August 2020. In 2011, most first-line (1 L) prescribing was fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). By 2021, common 1L were chlorambucil ± CD20 (26.1%), Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor (BTKi) (26.1%), and CD20 monotherapy (23.9%). In 2011, relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL treatment was CD20 monotherapy or FCR. By 2021, BTKi (57.7%) and venetoclax ± CD20 (26.1%) were most common. Compared to FCR, 1 L treatment duration (Hazard Ratio) was shorter for CD20 monotherapy (1.7) or chlorambucil ± CD20 (2.5). In R/R CLL, median duration was 24 (ibrutinib) and 19 months (venetoclax). Median OS was 127 months. CLLtreatment pattern shave greatly changed in Australia since the introduction of novel therapies.

Clinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a real-world study.

OBJECTIVE: Little progress has been made in recent years using first-line chemotherapy, including gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX, and NALIRIFOX, for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APC). In addition, the optimal second-line chemotherapy regimen has not been determined. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of second-line chemotherapy for APC. METHODS: Patients with APC who received first-line treatment from January 2008 to January 2021 were considered eligible for this retrospective analysis. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-seven and 617 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment, respectively. Demographic and clinical features, except age and liver metastasis, were comparable between the two groups (P < 0.05). The median OS was 8.8 and 7.8 months in patients who received a 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based combined regimen for first-line therapy, respectively (HR = 1.244, 95% CI = 1.090-1.419; P < 0.001). The median OS was 5.6 and 1.9 months in patients who received second-line chemotherapy and supportive care, respectively (HR = 0.766, 95% CI = 0.677-0.867; P < 0.001). The median PFS was not significantly differently between gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil monotherapy and combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A 5-fluorouracil- or gemcitabine-based combined regimen was shown to be as effective as a single 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine regimen as second-line therapy for patients with APC.