Treatment of apical vaginal prolapse with minimal mesh repair (Uphold): patient-reported long-term outcomes and mesh-related complications.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes and clinical findings after surgery for apical prolapse with the transvaginal Uphold mesh technique. Moreover, to evaluate the rate of mesh-related complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A historical cohort study of patients who underwent surgery from January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2019, at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Pelvic examination and patient completion of questionnaires were performed in 2018-2019. Information on adverse events and reoperations was obtained from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients were operated on using the Uphold mesh, 89% due to recurrent prolapse. Follow-up was attended by 192 patients (80%). Median follow-up time was 30 months, interquartile range 19-52. During follow-up, 29 patients (15%) underwent reoperation due to prolapse and are considered failures. Among the remaining, patient satisfaction was high. Thus, average score for pelvic symptoms affecting daily life was 2, on a scale of 0-10, where 0 represents no symptoms. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) had an average score of 6.4 (1: very much worse; 7 very much better). Preoperatively, 89.5% of the women had grade 2 or more apical prolapse, whereas at follow-up, this was only 6.1%. Perioperative heavy bleeding needing embolization was observed in one patient (0.5%). Two patients had serious constriction of the ureter and needed re-operation. Postoperative complications, primarily temporary voiding problems, were observed in 15 patients (8%). Complications during the follow-up period were registered in 23 patients (12%); eight of these were mesh erosions. Due to complications, 11 patients (6%) needed re-operation. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms that the Uphold procedure in a centralized set-up is a procedure with high patient-reported satisfaction even in a population characterized by a high proportion of recurrent prolapse. Moreover, the procedure seems safe with acceptable complication rates.

Reversal of colpocleisis-A surgical technique for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.

Given the rarity of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after obliterative procedures and the paucity of data in the literature on this topic, optimal management is challenging. We describe a technique of reversal of colpocleisis in an 81-year-old woman with recurrent prolapse as the first step in a staged, reconstructive procedure. Basic principles underlying our approach include multidisciplinary team involvement, detailed preoperative planning, and a series of investigations including different imaging modalities and a meticulous stepwise surgical technique. The distortion of anatomical planes, anticipated scarring, and close proximity of pelvic organs specifically bladder and rectum are important considerations. In our case, the multidisciplinary surgical team included urogynecologists, a urologist, and a colorectal surgeon. Detailed preoperative planning was agreed following multiple patient and team consultations. Preoperative investigations included ultrasound and videourodynamics. Intraoperatively, cystoscopy and sigmoidoscopy were performed to identify anatomical landmarks and planes, rule out fistulae, and evaluate for anatomical distortions involving pelvic organs. Subsequently, reversal of the colpocleisis was undertaken and uneventful. Postoperative recovery was uncomplicated and a sacrospinous fixation, anterior vaginal repair, and perineorrhaphy were performed as a secondary restorative procedure for the correction of recurrent prolapse.

Laparoscopic excision and re-attachment of sacrocolpopexy mesh.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Two cases are described and surgical techniques for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy are demonstrated at an academic affiliated hospital in patients with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: A laparoscopic approach was taken for surgical intervention, with excision of prior detached vaginal mesh and re-attachment of new sacrocolpopexy mesh. RESULTS: Two patients presented with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after failed surgical treatment. The first case is a 68-year-old vaginal multipara with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse status post laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, sacrocolpopexy, and mid-urethral sling performed at an outside institution. Preoperative physical examination revealed stage 3 prolapse. Mesh was loosely attached to the cervix. After surgical correction, postoperative physical examination revealed stage 1 prolapse at the 6-week postoperative visit. The second case is a 62-year old vaginal multipara with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse status post-total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy at an outside institution. Preoperative physical examination revealed stage 2 prolapse. The mesh was loosely attached to the vagina. After surgical correction, postoperative physical examination revealed stage 0 prolapse at the 6-week postoperative visit. Both patients reported improvement in symptoms and overall quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after failed initial sacrocolpopexy procedure can be safely accomplished laparoscopically through identification of points of mesh detachment, anatomical landmarks, removal of the prior vaginal portion of the mesh, and attachment of a new surgical mesh to either the sacrum or the sacral portion of the mesh.

A Case Series of Robot-assisted Rectus Abdominis Flap Harvest for Pelvic Reconstruction: A Single Institution Experience.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To analyze outcomes and postoperative complications in patients undergoing robot-assisted rectus abdominis flap harvest for pelvic floor reconstruction. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Academic setting. PATIENTS: Pelvic reconstruction surgery patients. INTERVENTIONS: The rectus abdominis muscle flap can be used as a flap for pelvic reconstruction, providing a large volume of soft tissue that can be used in the treatment of many comorbid conditions, including genital fistulas, postradiation pelvic exenteration, and abdominoperineal resection defects. Intraperitoneal harvest of the rectus muscle using a robotic approach allows avoidance of laparotomy and subsequent disruption of the anterior rectus sheath, thus preserving the integrity of the abdominal wall. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A retrospective analysis of patient demographic and clinical characteristics was performed for all patients who underwent robot-assisted rectus abdominis flap harvest for pelvic floor reconstruction at our institution from October 1, 2016, to October 31, 2018. The postoperative complications analyzed included bowel obstructions, surgical site infections, emergency room visits, and need for readmission. Six patients (4 women and 2 men), with a mean age of 69.2 years (range = 57-79 years) and median follow-up time of 9.2 months (range = 5-12 months), were included. Muscle flap harvest was performed on the right side in 4 patients and on the left in 2 patients. The indications for reconstructive surgery included vesicovaginal fistula, complex pelvic organ prolapse, anterior and posterior exenteration, partial and total vaginectomy, partial vulvectomy, and abdominoperineal resection. Two patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. One of the 6 cases was converted to laparotomy; however, this was not owing to the rectus harvest. Three patients experienced no complications after reconstruction; 1 patient reported occasional abdominal pain; 1 patient had intermittent bowel obstruction; and 1 patient developed a pelvic abscess, requiring readmission. All 6 patients achieved satisfactory healing of the pelvic wound after robot-assisted rectus abdominis flap inset. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted rectus abdominis flap harvest for pelvic floor reconstruction is a reliable means of defect closure, despite the presence of substantial comorbidities and risk factors in this patient cohort. Patient selection and counseling are crucial to optimize surgical outcomes in this complex population.

The impact of prior prolapse repairs on surgical outcomes with minimally invasive sacral colpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To determine whether prior prolapse repair has an impact on operative time, surgical complications, and prolapse recurrence with minimally invasive sacral colpopexy (MISC). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all laparoscopic and robotic MISC procedures performed from January 2009 to July 2014 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Patient demographics, clinical and surgical data were compared in women who underwent MISC for initial repair versus those undergoing MISC for recurrence after prior prolapse surgery. Our primary outcome was operating room (OR) time (skin incision to closure) using linear regression. Logistic regression compared complications (a composite variable considered present if any major complication occurred) and prolapse recurrence (any POP-Q point ≥0 or retreatment). RESULTS: Of 816 subjects, the mean age was 59.6 ± 8.7, with mean BMI 27.0 ± 3.0 in a primarily Caucasian population (97.8%). Subjects had predominantly POP-Q stage III prolapse (69.9%), and 21.3% reported prior prolapse repair. OR time was 205.0 ± 69.0 min. Prior prolapse repair did not impact OR time (p = 0.25) after adjusting for age, concomitant procedures, POP-Q measurements, changes in OR personnel, case order in the day, and preoperative stress incontinence. Complications occurred in 15.8% but were not impacted by prior prolapse repair (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.53-1.67) after adjusting for potential confounders. During a median follow-up of 31 weeks, 7.8% had recurrence with no impact from prior prolapse surgery (OR = 1.557, 95% CI = 0.67-3.64) after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to demonstrate increased OR time, complications, or prolapse recurrence for MISC based on history of prior prolapse repair. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the lack of difference in prolapse recurrence rates.

Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension - in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations.

BACKGROUND: The apical prolapse is probably the most complex form of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Adequate apical support is essential in the treatment of POP, as it contributes to the support in all vaginal compartments. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of symptomatic recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension (HUSLS), in a cohort of women characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations and a significant degree of prolapse. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 95 women who underwent HUSLS for symptomatic apical prolapse from 2002 to 2009 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Of these women, 97% attended a six-month clinical control. Recurrence was defined as symptomatic vaginal vault prolapse stage 2 or more (according to the International Continence Society (ICS) quantification system). Medical charts were reviewed for a mean period of 7.2 years. Any new contacts due to prolapse were noted. RESULTS: Before the operation, 73% of the women were hysterectomised, and 52% had previous prolapse surgery. Stage 2 apical prolapse was reported in 71% of the women, whereas 26% had stage 3 or 4. At six-month follow-up, 19% of the women had recurrent symptomatic apical prolapse, and 9% of the women had symptomatic recurrent prolapse in other compartments 6 months after operation. In all, 35% of the women had a renewed prolapse operation during the long-term follow-up period. Perioperative adverse events were seen in 7%. Two women were re-operated due to postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study of 95 women with a significant degree of prolapse and a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations demonstrates that the rate of recurrent prolapse associated with HUSLS might be higher than originally described. In conclusion, HUSLS may not be the optimal first choice of operation in this group of patients.

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament colpopexy for apical support in addition to hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.

AIM: To evaluate the perioperative complications and the anatomical outcomes of our laparoscopic uterosacral ligament (USL) colpopexy, which is a novel laparoscopic technique for the management of uterine prolapse. The objective was to report on outcome after 2 years of a technique using laparoscopic USL colpopexy. METHODS: A total of 152 uterine prolapse patients underwent laparoscopic USL colpopexy from May 2013 to April 2015. We described the surgical technique and performed a retrospective analysis of this laparoscopic technique. Patients underwent standardized assessment and examination using pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) score. The dependent values of Ba point (bladder), C point (vaginal cuff) and Bp point (rectum) were recorded preoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of postoperative examination. Pre/postoperative data were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Mean age, operative time and amount of hemorrhage were 68.2 ± 7.5 years, 118.3 ± 36.4 min and 60.5 ± 73.3 mL, respectively. Overall recurrent prolapse, which was defined as POP-Q stage II or higher, was noted in 29 patients (19%). However, only 2 patients presented recurrent rectocele among 51 patients with preoperative POP-Q stage II of uterine prolapse alone (recurrence rate; 3.9%). The pre/postoperative average POP-Q scores were -0.2/-2.7 cm (P < 0.05) at Ba point, -1.9/-5.1 cm (P < 0.05) at C point and -2.4/-2.3 cm (P = 0.06) at Bp point. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic visualization of uterosacral ligaments may result in safe colpopexy. Our results show this will be a useful procedure for apical support as native tissue repair.

FPMRS challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium (CoRPS): managing complicated cases : Series 3: Challenging recurrent prolapse in a medically complicated patient.

This case presents the work-up and management of a spina bifida patient with recurrent prolapse. Four international experts also provide their evaluation of and approach to this complex case. According to the literature, little is known regarding the approach to the management of this specific patient population.

RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study assessed the safety and efficacy of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior overlay mesh versus sacrocolpopexy (SCP) for posthysterectomy vault prolapse. METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized trial of women with posthysterectomy vault prolapse stage >2 according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Primary outcome was a composite of no vaginal bulge symptoms, no anatomical recurrence in the anterior or apical compartment at or beyond the hymenal ring, and no surgical retreatment for prolapse 12 months postsurgery. Secondary outcomes were peri- and postoperative complications, changes in prolapse, and urogenital and sexual symptoms at 12, 24, and 48 months based on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-20. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2011, 82 eligible women were randomized: 39 received VEULS and 43 received SCP. Primary composite outcome at 12 months for success was 41% for VEULS and 65% for SCP [odds ratio (OR 2.68, p = 0.03)]. Perioperative complications were more common in the SCP group. C-point was higher for SCP (-6.0 VEULS vs -8.0 SCP, p = 0.005) and total vaginal length (TVL) was longer for SCP (8.0 VEULS vs 9.0 SCP, p = 0.05). Cumulative mesh exposure rate at 4 years was similar between the uterosacral [4/39 (10.3%)] and sacrocolpopexy [4/43 (9.3%)] groups, bearing in mind that not all patients were examined at 4 years. Subjective outcomes derived from three domains of the PFDI-20 were similar at 12, 24, 48 months. Postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI) score improved similarly for both groups at all timepoints, with the minimally important difference of at least 21 reached for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Composite outcome of success was better for SCP at 12 months, but subjective outcomes for prolapse at all timepoints over 4 years for VEULS and SCP were not significantly different.

Long-term functional outcomes following mesh-augmented posterior vaginal prolapse repair.

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term patient-centered functional outcomes following posterior vaginal wall repair using mesh implants. METHOD: The present prospective telephone interview study enrolled a cohort of women who had undergone posterior vaginal wall repair with mesh between January 1, 2006 and February 28, 2009, at a single center in Israel. Patients were asked to report long-term outcomes, and demographic, clinical, intraoperative, and postoperative follow-up data were retrieved from patients' medical files. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to asses associations between baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 102 patients were contacted, with 80 (78.4%) at 61-83months after surgery agreeing to participate. A recurrence of prolapse symptoms was reported by 14 patients (18%) (12 required a corrective procedure), mesh had been removed from two patients owing to erosion/extrusion, and two others had undergone removal of granulation tissue. Long-term, bothersome symptoms were reported by 13 (16%) patients. Parity and previous hysterectomy were associated with lower odds of long-term adverse outcomes, and the location of the apical (C/D) pelvic organ prolapse quantification point and a change in its position following surgery were associated with increased odds of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: The long-term adverse-outcome rate was low for patients who underwent posterior vaginal mesh augmentation. These results highlight the importance of apical support for good long-term functional outcomes.

Native tissue repair or transvaginal mesh for recurrent vaginal prolapse: what are the long-term outcomes?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to assess outcomes in native tissue (NT) and transvaginal mesh (TVM) repair in women with recurrent prolapse. METHODS: A retrospective two-group observational study of 237 women who underwent prolapse repair after failed NT repair in two tertiary hospitals. A primary outcome of "success" was defined using a composite outcome of no vaginal bulge symptoms, no anatomical recurrence in the same compartment beyond the hymen (0 cm on POPQ) and no surgical re-treatment for prolapse in the same compartment. Secondary outcomes assessed included re-operation for prolapse in the same compartment, dyspareunia and mesh-related complications. RESULTS: Of a total of 336 repairs, 196 were performed in the anterior compartment and 140 in the posterior compartment. Compared with the TVM groups, women undergoing repeat NT repair were more likely to experience anatomical recurrence (anterior 40.9 % vs 25 %, p = 0.02, posterior 25.3 % vs 7.5 %, p = 0.01), report vaginal bulge (anterior 34.1 % vs 12 %, p < 0.01, posterior 24.1 % vs 7.5 %, p 0.02) and had a higher prolapse re-operation rate (anterior 23.9 % vs 7.4 %, p < 0.01, posterior 19.5 % vs 7.5 %, p = 0.08). Using composite outcomes, the success rate was higher with TVM repair in both compartments (anterior 34.2 % vs 13.6 %, p <0.01, posterior 56.6 % vs 23.0 %, p <0.01). Re-operations for mesh exposure were 9.3 % anteriorly and 15.1 % posteriorly. Although the number of women requiring a prolapse re-operation is lower in the TVM group, the overall re-operation rate was not significantly different when procedures to correct mesh complications were included. CONCLUSIONS: Although the success rate is better with the use of TVM for recurrent prolapse, the total re-operation rates are similar when mesh complication-related surgeries are included.

Long term subjective cure rate, urinary tract symptoms and dyspareunia following mesh augmented anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess patient-centered long term outcomes following anterior vaginal repair with mesh. METHODS: In January 2015, we identified 124 women who underwent anterior pelvic floor repair with mesh between January 2006 and February 2009. Patient records were reviewed and demographic, clinical, intra-operative and post-operative follow-up data retrieved. Telephone interviews were conducted to access information on clinical outcomes. Associations between baseline characteristics and long term symptoms were assessed by multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Seventy-nine women were reached and consented to participate. Patients were interviewed 79-104 months after surgery. Their mean age at the time of surgery was 62.48 ± 9.53 years; all had stage III cystocele with a mean POP Q point Ba of 5.32 ± 1.47. Twenty-four (30%) had a previous hysterectomy and 26 (33%) had a previous pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence operation. At telephone interviews, recurrence of prolapse symptoms was reported by 11 (13.9%) patients, mostly in the posterior compartment. Only 6 needed a corrective procedure. One patient had her mesh removed due to dyspareunia. Eleven (13.9%) reported lower urinary tract symptoms other than prolapse, as follows: stress urinary incontinence (1), overactive bladder (8) and dyspareunia (2). CONCLUSION: Long term rates of recurrent prolapse, dyspareunia and lower urinary tract symptoms were low for patients who underwent anterior vaginal wall mesh augmentation surgery for symptomatic cystoceles.