A systematic review of venetoclax for the treatment of unfit AML patients in real-world: is all that glitters gold?

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological disease that mainly affects elderly patients. Following the randomized VIALE-A trial, current standard treatment in patients who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy consists of the combination of venetoclax (VEN), a selective inhibitor of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2, with azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC). We performed a systematic review to critically assess the growing existing evidence regarding the effectiveness of the VEN-based combinations in unfit adult patients with newly diagnosed AML in the real-world setting. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of published manuscripts and conference abstracts (European Hematology Association and American Society of Hematology) was conducted (updated March 2024). Primary outcomes were composite complete remission (CRc) and median overall survival (mOS). A total of 73 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria, with a median age of 73 years old. The weighted mean mOS was 10.3 months among 7 138 patients, significantly lower than expected according to the VIALE-A trial (14.7 months), while the weighted mean CRc rate was 58.2% among 5 831 patients, slightly lower to that reported in the VIALE-A (66.4%). Early death rates at 30 and 60 days were 5% and 13%, respectively. The weighted mean percentage of subsequent allogeneic transplant was 15.4%. In conclusion, breakthrough mOS reported in the VIALE-A trial using VEN-AZA was not well reproduced in real world for unfit newly diagnosed AML patients, while CRc rates were more consistent. Strategies to optimize patient selection, dosing regimens, and supportive care are crucial to improve outcomes in real-world.

Tamsulosin 0.8 mg daily dose in management of BPH patients with failed tamsulosin 0.4 mg monotherapy and unfit for surgical intervention.

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of administering double-dose tamsulosin (0.8 mg) for treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who have not responded to the standard single dose of tamsulosin (0.4 mg) and are deemed unsuitable for transurethral resection (TUR) intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2022 and July 2023, we prospectively analyzed 111 patients who were experiencing severe BPH symptoms. These patients received a double dose of tamsulosin for one month. We collected baseline characteristics such as age, body mass index, and underlying medical conditions. Various parameters including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, and post-void residual volume were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: All 111 patients completed the study. The mean age, PSA level, and prostate volume were 63.12 ± 4.83 years, 3.42 ± 0.93 ng/ml, and 50.37 ± 19.23 ml, respectively. Of these patients, 93 showed improvement in Qmax, post-void residual volume, and IPSS score (p-value = 0.001). The total IPSS score and total Qmax improved from 24.03 ± 2.49 and 7.72 ± 1.64 ml/sec to 16.41 ± 3.84 and 12.08 ± 2.37 ml/sec, respectively. CONCLUSION: Double-dose 0.8mg tamsulosin as an alpha-blocker therapy appears to be a viable temporary management option for BPH patients who have not responded to the standard single dose 0.4mg tamsulosin and are not suitable candidates for TUR intervention.

Assessment of fitness for open repair in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) was originally designed as a treatment modality for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) deemed unfit for open repair. However, the definition of "unfit for open repair" is largely subjective and heterogenous. The purpose of this study was to compare patients deemed unfit for open repair who underwent EVAR to a matched cohort who underwent open repair for infrarenal AAAs. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative of the Society for Vascular Surgery was queried for patients who underwent EVAR and open infrarenal AAA repair from 2003 to 2022. Patients that underwent EVAR were included if they were deemed unfit for open repair by the operating surgeon. EVAR patients deemed unfit because of a hostile abdomen were excluded. Patients in both the open and EVAR datasets were excluded if their repair was deemed non-elective or if they had prior aortic surgery. EVAR patients were matched to a cohort of open patients. The primary outcome for this study was 1-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiac events, pulmonary complications, non-home discharge, reinterventions, and 5-year survival. RESULTS: A total of 5310 EVAR patients were identified who were deemed unfit for open repair. Of those, 3028 EVAR patients (57.0%) were able to be matched 1:1 to a cohort of open patients. Open patients had higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (20.2% vs 4.4%; P < .001), pulmonary complications (12.8% vs 1.6%; P < .001), non-home discharges (28.5% vs 7.9%; P < .001), and 30-day mortality (4.5% vs 1.4%; P < .001). There were no differences in early survival, but open repair had better middle and late survival compared with EVAR over the course of 5 years. A total of 74 EVAR patients (2.4%) had reinterventions during the study period. EVAR patients that required interventions had higher 1-year (40.5% vs 7.3%; P < .001) and 5-year mortality (43.2% vs 14.1%; P < .001) compared with those that did not require reinterventions. EVAR patients who had reinterventions had higher 1-year (40.5% vs 6.3%; P < .001) and 5-year (43.2% vs 20.3%; P = .006) mortality compared with their matched open cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing EVAR for AAAs who are deemed unfit for open repair have better perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with open repair. However, patients who had an open repair had better middle and late survival over the course of 5 years. The categorization of unfitness for open surgery may be inaccurate and re-evaluation of this terminology/concept should be undertaken.

[The Efficacy and Safety of Venetoclax Combined with Azacitidine in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Unfit for Intensive Chemotherapy].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of venetoclax (VEN) combined with azacitidine (AZA) in the treatment of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy. METHODS: The clinical data of 21 adult patients with unfit AML who were treated with VEN combined with AZA in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from January 2021 to May 2022 were collected, and the efficacy and safety were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: After one course of treatment with VEN and AZA, 16 out of 21 unfit AML patients reached complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 2 patients reached partial remission (PR), the overall response rate (ORR) was 85.7%. Among the 16 patients with CR/CRi, 13 achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Among the 11 patients with adverse prognosis, 8 achieved CR/CRi. By the deadline of follow-up, the median overall suivival (OS) of the entire cohort was not reached, with 1-year OS rate of 61.7%. The main adverse events of VEN combined with AZA were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions and infections. There were 13 cases of leukopenia, 7 cases of neutropenia, 7 cases of anemia, 4 cases of thrombocytopenia, and these hematologic adverse events were all grade 3-4. There were 11 cases with gastrointestinal reactions and 7 cases with infections. The above adverse events were controllable and tolerable. No tumor lysis syndrome or infection related death occurred. CONCLUSION: VEN combined with AZA can quickly achieve deep remission in adult patients with unfit AML, and it shows a good safety profile.

Prognostic impact of adjuvant therapy for cisplatin-unfit patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter analysis.

INTRODUCTION: No evidence exists for postoperative adjuvant therapy in elderly or renal dysfunction patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are unfit to receive cisplatin (CDDP). Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy for CDDP-unfit patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We defined CDDP-unfit patients as those aged ≥75 years or with renal dysfunction based on criteria established by expert panels and from prospective studies. CDDP-fit patients comprised all others. Between 2010 and 2020, among 1,423 patients with pathological stage II-III (8th edition of the AJCC-TNM Classification) NSCLC, 454 were identified as unfit for CDDP. Following propensity score matching in CDDP-unfit patients with and without postoperative adjuvant therapy, we analyzed the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of each group and assessed the impact of adjuvant therapy on survival. RESULTS: OS was significantly better in patients who received adjuvant therapy than in those who did not (5-year OS rate: 76.1 % vs. 50.0 %, p < 0.01) among 255 propensity score-matched patients. DFS was also significantly better in patients who received adjuvant therapy than in those who did not (5-year OS: 54.6 % vs. 35.1 %, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that postoperative adjuvant therapy could be beneficial for CDDP-unfit patients aged ≥75 years or with renal dysfunction. Future studies for CDDP-unfit patients should be designed based on the results of this study to determine the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy.

Definitive weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy in surgery-ineligible older adults with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region.

This study intends to address the impact of weekly hypofractionated radiation therapy with curative intent for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region in the elderly population.

Zanubrutinib-lenalidomide-rituximab (ZR2) in unfit diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: efficient and tolerant.

The objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness and safety of zanubrutinib, rituximab, and lenalidomide (ZR2) in unfit patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Thrombosis or bleeding risk of ZR2 regimen, especially when antiplatelet agents were co-prescribed, was also evaluated. We retrospectively reviewed unfit newly diagnosed (ND) and refractory or relapsed (R/R) patients with DLBCL who were administered with ZR2 regimen in two medical centers between December 2019 and February 2022. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), bleeding adverse events (AEs), and thrombosis episodes were analyzed. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of zanubrutinib alone or in combination with lenalidomide on platelet functions in vitro and in vivo. A total of 30 unfit patients (13 ND DLBCL and 17 R/R DLBCL patients) who received ZR2 regimen were enrolled in the study (median age: 69.5 years). The ultimate ORRs for the ND DLBCL and R/R DLBCL were 77.0% and 50.1%, respectively. The median follow-up was 16.6 months. The median PFS and OS were not achieved during the follow-up time. Subcutaneous hemorrhage AEs occurred in four cases, three cases suffered severe bleeding events, and thrombosis events were observed in two patients. ZR2 regimen inhibited platelet functions (aggregation, clot retraction, spreading and activation) in vitro and in vivo function testing especially in response to collagen. ZR2 is an efficient treatment option for unfit patients with DLBCL and could be well tolerated. Notably, this regimen inhibited platelet functions. Antiplatelet agents should be used with caution in patients treated with this regimen.

Efficacy and safety of coadministration of venetoclax and anti-fungal agents under therapeutic drug monitor in unfit acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome with neutropenia: a single-center retrospective study.

Unfit acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients with prolonged neutropenia demand coadministration of venetoclax and azoles. However, venetoclax dosing under drug-drug interaction with azoles remains controversial. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is expected to guide drug dosage adjustments. We retrospectively enrolled 17 patients under this coadministration and TDM. Venetoclax dosages were interfered when inappropriate drug concentrations appeared. The primary endpoints were objective response and adverse events. Venetoclax concentration outliers were more frequently evaluated before than after dose adjustment (Cmax 60.87% vs. 0.00%, p < .0001). MRD negativity rate was higher in patients staying within reference range than those having outliers (90.91% vs. 33.33%, p = .028). Objective response rate was 100%. Hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (93.3%), febrile neutropenia (53.3%), and thrombocytopenia (81.3%). Median time to neutropenia and thrombocytopenia recovery was 20 (14-32) and 16.5 (6-34) days, respectively. No invasive fungal and other life-threatening infections were observed.

Acute cholecystitis management in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients: the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) guidelines.

Dealing with acute cholecystitis in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients is frequent during daily practice and requires complex management. Several procedures exist to postpone and/or prevent surgical intervention in those patients who temporarily or definitively cannot undergo surgery. After a systematic review of the literature, an expert panel from the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) discussed the different issues and statements in subsequent rounds. The final version of the statements was discussed during the annual meeting in Rome (September 2022). The present paper presents the definitive conclusions of the discussion. Fifteen statements based on the literature evidence were provided. The statements gave precise indications regarding the decisional process and the management of patients who cannot temporarily or definitively undergo cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Acute cholecystitis management in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients should be multidisciplinary. The different gallbladder drainage methods must be tailored according to each patient and based on the expertise of the hospital. Percutaneous gallbladder drainage is recommended as the first choice as a bridge to surgery or in severely physiologically deranged patients. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage (cholecystoduodenostomy and cholecystogastrostomy) is suggested as a second-line alternative especially as a definitive procedure for those patients not amenable to surgical management. Trans-papillary gallbladder drainage is the last option to be reserved only to those unfit for other techniques. Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with percutaneous gallbladder drainage is suggested in all those patients recovering from the conditions that previously discouraged surgical intervention after at least 6 weeks from the gallbladder drainage.

Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is an aggressive myeloid malignancy predominantly affecting older adults. Despite the advancements in new therapies for AML, older and medically unfit patients continue to suffer from poor outcomes due to disease-related factors such as the mutational profile and patient-related factors such as comorbidities and performance status. In this review, we discuss a spectrum of therapeutic options for older patients with AML starting with a historical perspective and ending with therapies being investigated in clinical trials. We review the standard of care treatment options including combination venetoclax and hypomethylating agents, in addition to targeted therapies such as FLT3 and IDH inhibitors. Lastly, we shed light on challenges facing the care of older adults and their representation in clinical trials.

The history of oral decitabine/cedazuridine and its potential role in acute myeloid leukemia.

Decitabine, a member of the 5-azanucleosides, has a dose-dependent mechanism of action in vitro: termination of DNA replication at high doses, and inhibition of DNA methyltransferase at low doses. The alteration of DNA methylation patterns by low-dose decitabine is hypothesized to upregulate genes, which promote myeloblast differentiation. In a phase III clinical trial, low-dose decitabine achieved a superior overall response rate (ORR) when compared with 'treatment choice' [consisting of low-dose cytarabine (80%) and supportive care (20%)] as a frontline treatment for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite an improved ORR, the median overall survival (OS) for elderly patients with AML was poor, <1 year. In turn, venetoclax was added to low-dose decitabine, the combination of which significantly improved the ORR and median OS in elderly patients with AML. Currently, hypomethylating agents are being combined with other novel therapies as investigational strategies for elderly and unfit patients with AML. They are also being evaluated as components of maintenance therapy in patients achieving remission. An oral formulation of decitabine has been developed which relies on the concomitant use of oral cedazuridine to protect against first pass metabolism. This oral formulation, which has been approved in myelodysplastic syndrome, is intended to increase convenience of use and therefore compliance in patients. This review characterizes the evolution of decitabine, its oral formulation, and its future in the treatment of AML.

BR vs. R­miniCHOP in unfit patients with B­cell non­Hodgkin lymphoma: A randomized, two­center, cohort study.

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety between the bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) regimen and rituximab combined with low-dose doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-miniCHOP) in the treatment of 'unfit' patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma grade 3B (FL3B). Patients, >70 years of age with DLBCL or FL3B, defined as unfit according to Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, were included in the present study. All patients received 4-6 cycles of a BR or R-miniCHOP regimen at a three-week interval. The objective remission rate (ORR) and adverse reactions were evaluated between the two groups. A total of 35 patients, recruited between January 2020 and December 2021, were included in this prospective study. The median age was 74 years (range, 70-82 years). The ORR in the BR group was similar to that in the R-miniCHOP group (73.3 vs. 75.0%; P=0.606). However, the BR group exhibited a lower incidence of leukopenia than the R-miniCHOP group (20.0 vs. 60.0%; P=0.037). The univariate analysis revealed that the ORR was influenced by the serum ß2 microglobulin level. The BR regimen showed equivalent efficacy but more improved safety compared with R-miniCHOP in unfit patients with DLBCL and FL3B. The BR regimen may be considered as an alternative treatment in these subgroups of patients.

Surgery-ineligible elderly patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region gain clinical benefit from definitive weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of definitive weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of surgery-ineligible elderly patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region (cHNSCC). METHODS: Eligible elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with cHNSCC were included. Patients received definitive weekly hypofractionated RT, using megavoltage electrons, to a total dose of 56-64 Gy (8 Gy per fraction). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), defined as the percentage of patients with a complete (CR) or partial response (PR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), pain response, tolerability, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients with 27 lesions were included and treated with definitive weekly hypofractionated RT. All patients received the prescribed total dose. ORR was 92.6%, including 70.4% of lesions with a CR and 22.2% with a PR. Median DOR was 12 months. No severe toxicity occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed the satisfying efficacy and acceptable toxicity of definitive weekly hypofractionated RT for cHNSCC in elderly patients. Our results establish weekly hypofractionated scheduleas a promising treatment option for elderly patients with cHNSCC.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment in the Elderly: A Comprehensive Review of the Present and Future.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease of the hematopoietic system that remains a therapeutic challenge despite advances in our understanding of the underlying cancer biology in the past decade. It is also an affliction of the elderly that predominantly affects patients over 60 years of age. Standard therapy involves intensive chemotherapy that is often difficult to tolerate in older populations. Fortunately, recent developments in molecular targeting have shown promising results in treating leukemia, paving the way for novel treatment strategies that are easier to tolerate. SUMMARY: Venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, when combined with a hypomethylating agent, has proven to be a highly effective and well-tolerated drug and established itself as a new standard for treating AML in patients who are unfit for standard intensive therapy. Other targeted therapies include clinically proven and FDA-approved agents, such as IDH1/2 inhibitors, FLT3 inhibitors, and Gemtuzumab, as well as newer and more experimental drugs such as magrolimab, PI-kinase inhibitors, and T-cell engaging therapy. Some of the novel agents such as magrolimab and menin inhibitors are particularly promising, providing therapeutic options to a wider population of patients than ever before. Determining who will benefit from intense or novel low-intense therapy remains a challenge, and it requires careful assessment of individual patient's fitness and disease characteristics. KEY MESSAGES: This article reviews past and current treatment strategies that harness various mechanisms of leukemia-targeting agents and introduces novel therapies on the horizon aimed at exploring therapeutic options for the elderly and unfit patient population. It also provides a strategy to select the best available therapy for elderly patients with both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory AML.

CAR T in patients with large B-cell lymphoma not fit for autologous transplant.

Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients with comorbidities and/or advanced age are increasingly considered for treatment with CD19 CAR T, but data on the clinical benefit of CAR T in the less fit patient population are still limited. We analysed outcomes of consecutive patients approved for treatment with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) by the UK National CAR T Clinical Panel, according to fitness for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). 81/404 (20%) of approved patients were deemed unfit for ASCT. Unfit patients were more likely to receive tisa-cel versus axi-cel (52% vs. 48%) compared to 20% versus 80% in ASCT-fit patients; p < 0.0001. The drop-out rate from approval to infusion was significantly higher in the ASCT-unfit group (34.6% vs. 23.5%; p = 0.042). Among infused patients, response rate, progression-free and overall survival were similar in both cohorts. CAR T was well-tolerated in ASCT-unfit patients with an incidence of grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity of 2% and 11%, respectively. Results from this multicentre real-world cohort demonstrate that CD19 CAR T can be safely delivered in carefully selected older patients and patients with comorbidities who are not deemed suitable for transplant.

Comparison between azacitidine and decitabine as front-line therapy in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy.

We compared the efficacy of azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) in elderly patients with untreated AML, diagnosed according to WHO criteria. In the two groups, we evaluated complete remission (CR), overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS). The AZA and DEC groups included 139 and 186 patients, respectively. To minimize the effects of treatment selection bias, adjustments were made using the propensity-score matching method, which yielded 136 patient pairs. In the AZA and DEC cohort, median age was 75 years in both, (IQR, 71-78 and 71-77), median WBCc at treatment onset 2.5 × 109/L (IQR, 1.6-5.8) and 2.9 × 109/L (IQR, 1.5-8.1), median bone marrow (BM) blast count 30% (IQR, 24-41%) and 49% (IQR, 30-67%), 59 (43%) and 63 (46%) patients had a secondary AML, respectively. Karyotype was evaluable in 115 and 120 patients: 80 (59%) and 87 (64%) had intermediate-risk, 35 (26%) and 33 (24%) an adverse risk karyotype, respectively. Median number of cycles delivered was 6 (IQR, 3.0-11.0) and 4 (IQR, 2.0-9.0), CR rate was 24% vs 29%, median OS and 2-year OS rates 11.3 (95% CI 9.5-13.8) vs 12.0 (95% CI 7.1-16.5) months and 20% vs 24%, respectively. No differences in CR and OS were found within the following subgroup: intermediate- and adverse-risk cytogenetic, frequency of WBCc at treatment ≥ 5 × 10^9 L and < 5 × 10^9/L, de novo and secondary AML, BM blast count < and ≥ 30%. Median DFS for AZA and DEC treated patients was 9.2 vs 12 months, respectively. Our analysis indicates similar outcomes with AZA compared to DEC.

An Update on FLT3 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Landscape.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) mutations. RECENT FINDINGS: The recent European Leukemia Net (ELN2022) recommendations re-classified AML with FLT3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD) as intermediate risk regardless of Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) co-mutation or the FLT3 allelic ratio. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is now recommended for all eligible patients with FLT3-ITD AML. This review outlines the role of FLT3 inhibitors in induction and consolidation, as well as for post-alloHCT maintenance. It outlines the unique challenges and advantages of assessing FLT3 measurable residual disease (MRD) and discusses the pre-clinical basis for the combination of FLT3 and menin inhibitors. And, for the older or unfit patient ineligible for upfront intensive chemotherapy, it discusses the recent clinical trials incorporating FLT3 inhibitors into azacytidine- and venetoclax-based regimens. Finally, it proposes a rational sequential approach for integrating FLT3 inhibitors into less intensive regimens, with a focus on improved tolerability in the older and unfit patient population. The management of AML with FLT3 mutation remains a challenge in clinical practice. This review provides an update on the pathophysiology and therapeutic landscape of FLT3 AML, as well as a clinical management framework for managing the older or unfit patient ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Use of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and anti-CD20 therapy in children and adolescents with non-Hodgkin lymphoma unfit for intensive therapy.

Multiagent immunochemotherapy affords excellent outcomes in pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); however, scarce data exist for patients unfit for intensive treatment. Rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) is well tolerated and efficacious in elderly adults with NHL; however, its use has not been described in pediatrics. In this retrospective, single-center study, six children with mature B-cell NHL and significant comorbidities received anti-CD20 therapy with GemOx (rituximab or obinutuzumab or ofatumumab with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin [R/O-GemOx]). R/O-GemOx was well tolerated and resulted in complete response in two of three patients with newly diagnosed NHL and one of three patients with primary refractory NHL. R/O-GemOx is a viable treatment option for children with NHL who cannot tolerate intensive therapy.

Hypomethylating agents combined with low-dose chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: a real-world clinical experience.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based regimens in the treatment of older adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), unfit for standard induction chemotherapy. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of 140 older adult patients with AML who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy and were treated with HMA-based therapies were retrospectively analysed. The median age of the group was 70 years, and poor-risk cytogenetics and secondary/treatment-related AML (s/t-AML) accounted for 45.6% and 34.3% of these patients, respectively. The overall response rate was 48.6%, and 40.1% for patients who achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery. The median overall survival (OS) was 10.4 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 42.6%, 19.9%, and 4.9%, respectively. Early mortality accounted for 4.3% of all cases, and infection occurred in 87.1% of all patients during induction therapy. Patients who received HMA and low-dose chemotherapy presented with significantly superior response and long-term survival rates compared to those who received HMA alone. They also showed comparable outcomes to those treated with the azacitidine plus venetoclax protocol. Low-dose chemotherapy in combination with decitabine or azacitidine showed a similar response rate and prognosis. Age ≥ 75years and a white blood cell (WBC) count ≥ 10 × 109 cells/L were identified as independent adverse prognostic factors for OS, while poor-risk cytogenetics, percentage of bone marrow blasts, and s/tAML had no significant impact on OS when patients were treated with HMA-based regimens. In conclusion, HMA combined with low-dose chemotherapy was effective and safe in older adults with AML who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy, and no difference was observed between decitabine and azacitidine.