Scope of practice regulation in medicine: balancing patient safety, access to care and professional autonomy.

Scope of practice regulation in medicine is crucial for ensuring patient safety, access to care and professional autonomy. This paper explores the impact of scope of practice regulation on healthcare delivery, professional responsibilities and patient outcomes. It discusses the variability in standards for safe practice, the challenges in defining boundaries between medical specialties and the recent controversies in cosmetic surgery practice. The paper also examines the potential benefits and drawbacks of rigorous scope of practice regulations, including their impact on clinical innovation, flexibility and access to care. Furthermore, it delves into the implications of defensive medicine and the consequences of restrictive regulations on patient care. The author proposes implementing a proactive, national, artificial intelligence-powered, real-time outcome monitoring system to address these challenges. This system aims to cover every patient undergoing a surgical procedure and could be gradually extended to non-surgical conditions, benefiting all key stakeholders in the health system. The paper emphasises the need for a balanced approach to scope of practice regulation to avoid stifling clinical innovation and professional autonomy, while ensuring patient safety and professional accountability.

The Scope of Practice of an Embedded Pediatric Palliative Oncology Clinic.

CONTEXT: Pediatric palliative care (PPC) improves end-of-life (EOL) outcomes for children with cancer. Though PPC visits are the 'intervention' in studies focused on EOL care, the content of PPC visits within pediatric oncology is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand the scope of PPC practice during visits for children with cancer and their families. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients 0-27 years with cancer seen in PPC clinic within an academic pediatric oncology center between 2017 and 2022. During each PPC visit, documenting providers chose the domains discussed or managed (goals of care, symptom management, and care coordination with respective subdomains). Data was abstracted from the electronic health record, PPC clinic database, and Cancer Registry. The differences in frequency and addressed domains were analyzed by demographics, visit type, diagnosis group, and proximity to EOL. RESULTS: Across 351 patients, 1919 outpatient PPC visits occurred. Median domains were higher in visits <90 days vs. 91+ days from EOL (12.0 vs. 10.0; p < 0.0001); pain and hospice collaboration were particularly discussed closer to EOL. Psychological symptoms like anxiety (30.7% vs. 21.1%; p < 0.001) were addressed more in follow-ups than initial visits. Compared to brain tumor or leukemia/lymphoma visits, solid tumor visits addressed more symptom management subdomains, especially pain (79.9%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The scope of PPC practice is broad and varied. Each visit encompasses many subdomains, the most common being care coordination with oncology teams and helping patients/families cope with the disease. More domains were addressed in solid tumor visits and near EOL.

Clinical innovation and scope of practice regulation: a case study of the Charlie Teo decision.

The issue of regulation of scope of practice (SOP) has recently been highlighted through the high-profile case of New South Wales-based neurosurgeon, Mr Charles Teo and specifically the finding of 'unsatisfactory professional conduct' by the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC) in Teo, Charles (2023) NSWMPSC 2 (12 July 2023). The HCCC decision went to two issues in Teo's practice: (1) his decision to perform a surgery not within the SOP of his profession [at 238]; and (2) his failure to gain patient informed consent for that surgery [at 245]. This paper explores the findings against Teo with respect to SOP and recommends a nuanced approach to the regulation of clinical innovation and SOP evolution.

Radiation oncologists' scope of practice and role in cancer management in Australia, New Zealand, and Singapore: Are we clinicians or technicians?

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the scope of practice and role in cancer management for radiation oncologists in Australia, New Zealand, and Singapore (ANZ). METHODS: A 27-question survey was emailed to all practicing radiation oncologists listed on the RANZCR database in mid-2021. RESULTS: There was a 54% response rate. Respondents reported managing symptoms associated with radiation therapy (96%), cancer-related symptoms (86%), writing narcotic and analgesic prescriptions (76%), being involved in palliative care (57%), prescribing non-cytotoxic systemic therapy (45%), and admitting patients (41%). Just over 20% wanted to expand their scope of practice, but for those who were unable to, insufficient time (35%), inter-specialty political difficulties (14%), and lack of support from the organisation (12%) were the major reasons. Over half of respondents (56.4%) thought they provided an opinion on the overall role of cancer management. Just under 20% provided a radiation therapy opinion only and <1% provided radiation therapy at the request of the referring clinician. The remainder reported a combination of these. Over 80% of respondents thought their ideal role was to be involved in overall cancer management and 20% believed they should be providing an opinion on radiation therapy only. The ideal role matched the actual role in over 87% of respondents and most respondents thought radiation oncology training enabled an opinion on overall cancer management. Over 90% of respondents were satisfied with their current role in cancer management. Radiation oncologists felt they were perceived as independent clinicians and the large majority (87%) thought radiation oncologists should be part of a multidisciplinary team rather than leaders in cancer management. CONCLUSION: This study has revealed a broad but expected scope of practice for ANZ radiation oncologists with the large majority providing an opinion on overall cancer management or radiation therapy and their ideal role matching their actual role.

ACPSEM position paper on ROMP scope of practice and staffing levels for magnetic resonance linear accelerators.

The purpose of this position paper is to outline the ACPSEM recommendations on Medical Physicist scope of practice and staffing levels, as they relate to the use of dedicated MRI-Linacs in the treatment of patients. A core function of Medical Physicists is to safely implement changes in medical practice via the introduction of new technology and to ensure high quality radiation oncology services are provided to patients. Determining the feasibility of MRI-Linacs in any existing setting, or in establishing a new site, mandates the knowledge and services of Radiation Oncology Medical Physicists (ROMPs) as the Qualified Experts within this setting. ROMPs are key members of the multi-disciplinary team which will be required to steer the successful establishment of MRI Linac infrastructure within departments. To support efficient implementation, ROMPs must be embedded in the process from the start, including any feasibility study, initiation of the project, and development of the business case. ROMPs must be retained throughout all stages of acquisition, service development, and ongoing clinical use and expansion. The number of MRI-Linacs in Australia and New Zealand is growing. This expansion is occurring in parallel with rapid technological evolution, expanding tumour stream applications, and increasing consumer uptake. Growth and applications of MRI-Linac therapy will continue to occur beyond current known horizons, via development on the MR-Linac platform itself and through the migration of learning from this platform to conventional Linacs (known horizons for example include the use of daily, online image guided adaptive radiotherapy and MRI data informing decision making for planning and treatment before and throughout treatment courses). Clinical use, research and development will be a significant component of expanding patient access to MRI-Linac treatment and there will be an ongoing need to attract and retain ROMPs to initially establish services and in particular to drive service development and delivery for the life of the Linacs. MRI and Linac technologies mean it is necessary to perform a specialized workforce assessment for these devices, distinct from those employed for conventional Linacs and associated services. MRI-Linacs are complex, have a heightened risk profile compared to standard Linacs, and are unique in their treatment of patients. Accordingly, the workforce needs for MRI-Linacs are greater than for standard Linacs. To ensure safe and high-quality Radiation Oncology patient services are provided, it is recommended that staffing levels should be based on the 2021 ACPSEM Australian Radiation Workforce model and calculator using the MRI-Linac specific ROMP workforce modelling guidelines outlined in this paper. The ACPSEM workforce model and calculator are closely aligned with other Australian/New Zealand and international benchmarks.

[Intention to Delegate Clinical Practice of Medical Specialists in Accordance with the Enactment of the Scope of Practice for Advanced Practice Nurses].

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the nationwide intention to delegate clinical practice of medical specialists in accordance with the enactment of the scope of practice for advanced practice nurses (APNs). METHODS: Data were collected from October to December 2021 using Google Surveys. In total, 147 medical specialists from 12 provinces responded to the survey. The survey questionnaire was categorized into four legislative draft duties, according to the scope of practice (a total of 41 tasks): Twenty-nine tasks on treatments, injects, etc., performed under the guidance of a physician and other activities necessary for medical treatment (treatment domain); two tasks on collaboration and coordination; six tasks on education, counseling, and quality improvement; four regarding other necessary tasks. Participants were asked whether they were willing to delegate the tasks to APN. RESULTS: The intention to delegate tasks to APN was higher for non-invasive tasks such as blood sampling (97.3%) or simple dressing (96.6%). Invasive tasks such as endotracheal tube insertion (10.2%), sampling: bone marrow biopsy & aspiration (23.8%) showed low intention to delegate in the treatment domain. Participants who were older, male, and had more work careers with APN, showed a higher intention to delegate tasks. CONCLUSION: To prevent confusion in the clinical setting, a clear agreement on the scope of APN practice as APN delegated by physicians should be established. Based on this study, legal practices that APN can perform legally should be established.

Pediatric Ophthalmology Scope of Practice.

PURPOSE: To determine practice patterns of pediatric ophthalmologists with respect to types of medical conditions cared for and age of patients treated due to limited data regarding pediatric ophthalmologists' scope of practice. METHODS: A survey was sent to 1408 international and United States members of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) membership through the group's internet listserv. Responses were collated and analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety members (6.4%) responded. 89% of respondents confine their practices to pediatric ophthalmology and adult strabismus. The percentages of respondents who provide primary surgical and medical treatment of the following conditions include 68% for ptosis and anterior orbital lesions, 49% for cataracts, 38% for uveitis, 25% for retinopathy of prematurity, 19% for glaucoma, and 7% for retinoblastoma. For conditions other than strabismus, 59% restrict their practice to patients less than 21 years of age. CONCLUSION: Pediatric ophthalmologists provide primary medical and surgical care for children with a wide variety of ocular conditions, including complex disorders. Awareness of this variety of practice might prove beneficial in encouraging residents to consider careers in pediatric ophthalmology. Consequently, fellowship education in pediatric ophthalmology should include exposure to these areas.

Extended scope of practice needed for Australian rural general surgeons: a review of South Australia's rural general surgical caseload and case mix.

BACKGROUND: There is a shortage of surgeons caring for the 33% of Australians residing in rural and regional areas. In order to help appreciate what rural general surgery entails and optimize training for aspiring rural surgeons, the aim of this study was to analyse the general surgical departments' procedural caseload and casemix in four rural South Australian hospitals. METHODS: This is a retrospective multi-centre study involving four rural surgical centres in South Australia (Mt Gambier, Whyalla, Port Augusta, and Port Lincoln). Surgical procedures performed from 2014-2020 were extracted from departmental audits. To identify trends of surgical procedure over time, the data was divided into three time periods (Period 1: February 2014-December 2015, Period 2: January 2016-December 2017, Period 3: January 2018-March 2020). RESULTS: A total of 44 191 surgical procedures were performed, 70.2% being day procedures. 54% were endoscopic procedures, 46% were operative procedures. 60.6% of the operative procedures were general surgery procedures. 28.5% were general surgery-based subspecialty (colorectal, hepato-pancreato-biliary, upper gastrointestinal, and breast). 10.9% were non-general surgery-based subspecialty (urology, plastics, vascular, orthopaedics, head and neck, and obstetrics and gynaecology). There were no statistically significant fluctuations in procedure caseload in all aspects (endoscopic and operative procedures) over the three time periods. CONCLUSION: The majority of a rural Australian general surgeon's procedures are endoscopic. Operative procedures are mainly general surgery based. It may be beneficial to equip aspiring rural general surgeons to manage basic non-general surgery procedures (urological, vascular, and orthopaedic).

Essential core competencies for scope of practice of paediatric oncology nurses in Latin America: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Nurses comprise the largest group of health workers globally and are essential to the provision of care necessary for delivering curative therapy to children with cancer. In high-income countries, previous studies of the nurse workforce have shown an association between patient morbidity and mortality and nursing-related factors such as staffing, education and the nursing practice environment. There is currently limited evidence available to define the scope of essential core competencies for paediatric oncology nursing (PON) practice internationally and specifically in Latin America. Clearly defined essential core competencies contribute to establishing nurses' scope of practice within clinical practice, education and research settings. Here, we aimed to map and synthesise the available evidence on the scope of PON practices in the context of clinical practice, educational training and research settings in Latin America. METHODS: A scoping review (ScR) protocol is reported, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement and guided by The Joanna Briggs Institute. MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, plus additional sources: The ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global, The British Library, Google Scholar, medRXiv, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO-ICTRP will be searched. No date or language restrictions will be employed. Two independent researchers will conduct all the steps of this ScR. The findings will be presented through tables, charts, narrative summaries and assessed based on the outcomes. The search strategy will be updated in May 2022. The expected completion date for this ScR is November 2022. ETHICS/DISSEMINATION: This protocol does not require ethical approval. The dissemination plans comprise peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations, to be shared with International Oncology Societies/International Nursing Societies and advisory groups to inform discussions on future research. We expect that our results will be of interest to nurse professionals, especially, PON and nurse scholars concerned with this particular issue.

Extending the scope of practice for experienced assistant practitioners in breast screening and the impact on service resilience.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) required Assistant Practitioners (APs), who are non-registered practitioners, to be supervised by and work alongside a registered radiographer (RPs). Following a national pilot looking at the implementation of two APs working remotely without direct supervision by a radiographer, this study seeks to evaluate a local trial of this new model of working. METHODS: Pairs of APs were deployed to work together on a mobile breast screening unit over a four-month period. Assessments were carried out to review technical performance using established NHSBSP technical repeat and recall rates in the United Kingdom. Notes on any queries from those involved during the dual AP sessions were prospectively collected and reviewed. Feedback from APs and other multi-disciplinary team members were collected and content analysis was applied. RESULTS: A total of 828 women were screened across the 26 AP clinics that were delivered. Technical repeat and recall rates of participating APs remained stable throughout the pilot period and marginally improved across all participating staff. No women attended the AP clinic who could not be screened and no support from a RP was required during the sessions. Seven normal clinics were converted to AP clinics due to lack of staff on the day, avoiding the cancellation of screening clinics. Feedback from across the screening team was positive. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the autonomy of experienced APs can significantly contribute to the delivery of a resilient radiographic workforce that maintains service performance. Suitable experience and wider team involvement appear to be keys to success in this case. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Increasing the autonomy and voice of the APs has a positive effect on the resilience of the wider radiographic workforce and the service as a whole. It also can provide a mechanism for raising their profile with a possible raise in job satisfaction, staff engagement and retention.

Oncology Nurse Practitioners in Genetics: Examining Scope of Practice and Competence.

Genomic science is rapidly evolving, and ordering germline testing requires appropriate and comprehensive assessment of a patient's personal and family history, as well as the knowledge base to facilitate selection of the best test or panel of tests, provision of pretest counseling for informed consent, interpretation of test results, post-test recommendations, and coordination of care for other at-risk family members. Prior to ordering germline genetic testing, an advanced practice RN's scope of practice accountability includes consideration of competence in the provision of genomic care. This article provides a case study to illustrate the complexities of issues related to competence when ordering germline genetic testing.

Benchmarking service provision, scope of practice, and skill mix for physiotherapists in adult cystic fibrosis care delivery.

BACKGROUND: Increasing age, numbers, and complexity of care are potentially impacting physiotherapy service delivery for adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe physiotherapy service provision, scope of practice, and skill mix in a large tertiary adult CF center, and determine if services were meeting clinical practice recommendations. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study examined inpatient and outpatient physiotherapy care across a three-month period in a tertiary adult CF center. Physiotherapy services were described by number and skill level of physiotherapists, total hours of activity, and number, type, and duration of each physiotherapy activity. RESULTS: Twenty-two physiotherapists provided care. Respiratory (n = 1058, 38%), and exercise treatments (n = 338, 12%) were the most frequent. Exercise testing (n = 20, 1%), and detailed treatment reviews (n = 79, 3%) occurred infrequently. Time for research was limited. Junior physiotherapists undertook more exercise treatments per day (p < .01), with senior physiotherapists attending outpatient clinics (p < .01). CONCLUSION: A large number of physiotherapists were involved in the delivery of services. Recommended respiratory and exercise treatments were frequently provided; however, other recommended activities occurred infrequently. The impact of increasing age, numbers of patients, and complexity of care may be contributing to demand exceeding supply for physiotherapy services. Future studies are required to determine innovative approaches to address the gaps in clinical practice recommendations.

Knowledge and Perception of Registered Nurses Regarding the Scope of Practice of Speech-Language Pathologists.

Objective: To assess the knowledge and perception of registered nurses regarding the scope of practice of speech-language pathologists (SLP) in Saudi Arabia. Background: Interdisciplinary collaboration is vital between the SLP and nurses due to the complex care needed by patients with speech problems. Methods: A total of 294 registered nurses were surveyed utilizing the Knowledge and Perception of Speech-Language Pathologists questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and tests for differences and relationships were performed. Results: The findings revealed that nursing respondents had an overall good understanding of the value and scope of practice of the SLP. However, they frequently and wrongly responded to scenarios concerning patients who suffered from Alzheimer's dementia, laryngeal cancer, traumatic brain injury, and stroke. Conclusions: It is vital for nurses to understand the value, role, and scope of practice of the SLP. Further educational nursing interventions and training are necessary for effective interprofessional collaboration and teamwork.