Medical therapy has similar hemostatic efficacy with endoscopic treatment for PUB patients with adherent clot (FIIb ulcers).

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no clear consensus on whether medical treatment or endoscopic treatment should be used for peptic ulcer bleeding patients with adherent clot. The aim of this study is to investigate the hemostatic effects of medical treatment, single endoscopic treatment, and combination endoscopic treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) patients with adherent clot. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed PUB patients with adherent clot who underwent endoscopic examination or treatment in our center from March 2014 to January 2023 and received intravenous administration of proton pump inhibitors. Patients were divided into medical treatment (MT) group, single endoscopic treatment (ST) group, and combined endoscopic treatment (CT) group. Subsequently, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to calculate the rebleeding rate. RESULTS: A total of 605 eligible patients were included in this study. After IPTW, the rebleeding rate in the MT group on days 3, 7, 14, and 30 were 13.3 (7.3), 14.2 (7.8), 14.5 (7.9), and 14.5 (7.9), respectively; the rebleeding rates in the ST group were 17.4 (5.1), 20.8 (6.1), 20.8 (6.1), and 20.8 (6.1), respectively; the rebleeding rates in the CT group were 0.4 (0.9), 1.7 (3.3), 2.3 (4.5), and 2.3 (4.5), respectively. Although the rebleeding rate in the medical treatment group was higher, there was no significant difference among the three groups on days 3, 7, 14, and 30 (P = 0.132, 0.442, 0.552, and 0.552). CONCLUSIONS: Medical therapy has similar hemostatic efficacy with endoscopic treatment for PUB patients with adherent clot (FIIb ulcers). However, for patients with more risk factors and access to well-equipped endoscopy centers, endoscopic treatment may be considered. The choice of treatment approach should be based on the individual conditions of the patient, as well as other factors such as medical resources available.

Overview of Vaginal Ulcerative Disease.

Genital ulcers may be located on the vagina, penis, and anorectal or perineal areas and may be infectious or noninfectious. Vaginal ulcers affect patients of all ages and are commonly due to sexually transmitted infections, such as herpes simplex virus, the most common cause of genital ulcers in the United States. Non-sexually transmitted infections, such as Epstein-Barr virus, and other noninfectious causes, such as trauma, medications, and autoimmune disease, rarely can present with genital ulcers. Appropriate history, examination findings, and targeted testing must be used to correctly diagnose and treat vaginal ulcers. [Pediatr Ann. 2024;53(1):e10-e16.].

Unique Usages of Dehydrated Human Amnion Chorion Membrane Allografts in Dermatology.

Dehydrated human amnion chorion membrane (dHACM) allografts are synthetic skin substitutes derived from placental tissue. dHACM allografts are used for replacing lost or damaged dermal tissue, as they contain many of the components found within the extracellular matrix that are beneficial in wound healing. Common uses of dHACM allografts include the healing of diabetic and non-diabetic foot and leg ulcers, decubitus ulcers, and wounds following debridement. While these grafts have been proven to be beneficial in other disciplines of medicine, their potential for use in the field of dermatology is emerging. Current clinical cases and research have shown dHACM allografts to be beneficial in repairing damaged tissue due to dermatologic conditions. They could play a role in the treatment of conditions causing chronic wounds, including dermal scarring or loss, and the repair of fragile skin. Examples of dHACM allograft use in dermatology include cases of pyoderma gangrenosum, Netherton syndrome, and wound healing with Mohs micrographic surgery. This literature review explores the efficacy of using dHACM allografts for the treatment of healing wounds within the field of dermatology. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1228-1231. doi:10.36849/JDD.7115.

Anastomotic Ulcers: Current Understanding of the Pathogenesis and Management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Anastomotic ulceration following intestinal resection is an under- recognized problem in pediatrics. We discuss the relevant literature regarding this condition. RECENT FINDINGS: Anastomotic Ulceration following intestinal resection is a potentially life threatening cause of refractory anemia. Evaluation should include correction of micronutrient deficiencies and endoscopic evaluation by upper and lower endoscopy and small intestinal endoscopy if necessary. Initial treatment by medical therapy may consist of anti-inflammatory agents as well as antibiotics to treat small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Surgical resection should be considered if refractory to treatment. Anastomotic ulcers in pediatric patients with small bowel resection should be considered as a cause of refractory iron deficiency anemia. Endoscopic evaluation should be undertaken to look for evidence of anastomotic ulcers. Surgical resection should be considered if medical therapy fails.

Hyperbaric Oxygen as an Adjunct in the Treatment of Venous Ulcers: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The use of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) in diabetic wounds has been studied extensively. Even though venous insufficiency is the most common cause of lower limb ulceration, there is comparatively little evidence regarding the use of HBOT for Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU). We performed a systematic-review to evaluate and synthesise available evidence, to evaluate whether patients with VLU, when treated with HBOT, had greater rates of (i) complete VLU healing or (ii) reduction in VLU area, than controls. METHODS: In keeping with PRISMA guidelines, database searches of PubMed, Scopus and Embase was performed. After removal of duplicates, titles were screened for relevance by two authors, then abstracts, and in turn full text manuscripts. Data were extracted from relevant sources including one published abstract. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) and Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies (ROBINS-I) tools. RESULTS: Six studies were included. There was significant heterogeneity across the studies, with no standard control intervention, method of outcome reporting, or duration of follow up. Two studies reported 12 week follow up results and pooled analysis of complete ulcer healing showed no statistically significant difference between HBOT and controls for the outcome of complete ulcer healing OR 1.54 (95%CI = .50-4.75) P = .4478. A similar non-signifiacnt result was seen in four studies reporting 5-6 week follow up; OR 5.39 (95%CI = .57-259.57) P = .1136. Change in VLU area was reported in all studies, and pooled standardised mean difference was 1.70 (95%CI = .60 to 2.79) P = .0024, indicating a statistically significant benefit of HBOT in reducing ulcer area. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence suggests that HBOT does not significantly affect complete healing of VLU. There is a statistically significant benefit in terms of reducing ulcer size, though in the absence of ulcer healing the clinical significance of this is not established. Current evidence does not justify widespread use of HBOT for VLU.

Effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on the patients with venous leg ulcer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to explore the adjuvant effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with venous leg ulcer (VLU) undergoing surgeries and non-surgeries. Literatures were searched from Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Pubmed, Wan fang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and VIP from inception to November 15, 2022. The risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as effect size for categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively, with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). The heterogeneity was assessed using Q-test and quantified as I2. Sensitivity analysis was performed for all outcomes. A total of 11 studies were finally included in this study, with a total of 617 patients (313 in the HBOT group and 304 in the control group). Results showed that HBOT in combination with surgeries was associated with shorter ulcer healing time (WMD: -13.76, 95%CI: -20.42 to -7.10), lower VAS score (WMD: -0.95, 95% CI: -1.83 to -0.07), and smaller ulcer area (WMD: -2.64, 95%CI: -3.86 to -1.42). HBOT in combination with non-surgeries was associated with higher ulcer PAR (WMD: 20.82, 95%CI: 5.86 to 35.79), but no statistical significance was found in the improvement of ulcer area (WMD: 0.79, 95% CI: -1.54 to 3.12). Our results indicating that HBOT had a good adjuvant effect in surgeries to treat VLU, and its effect in non-surgeries needed further studies.

A Case Report on Treatment of Nonhealing Leg Ulcer: Do Not Forget the Underlying Disease.

Prevalence of nonhealing ulcers of lower extremities has increased over years causing heavy health, social, and economic burdens. Chronic ulcers are difficult to treat since they require tailored multistep treatment and patient compliance. To treat chronic wounds successfully, clinicians must keep in mind the ulcer etiology as well as the underlying diseases. Several factors may be involved in the pathogenesis of chronic skin ulcers. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis belongs to the group of immune vascular diseases and may be an extrahepatic manifestation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We describe the case of a patient with a nonhealing vasculitic leg ulcer and chronic HCV infection successfully treated with the combination of advanced dermal substitute and direct-acting antiviral therapy. An 81-year-old female presented to our unit with a 6-month history of a leg ulcer that developed from an exudating skin nodule. At presentation, the lesion was large,caused a severe pain and was unresponsive to analgesics. Skin biopsy showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis. She had a history of old untreated HCV infection, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic venous insufficiency and tibial arteriopathy. The application of porcine-derived dermal substitute achieved only initial improvement. Therefore, direct-acting antiviral therapy was started, and when HCV RNA became undetectable in blood, pain disappeared and skin ulcer improved up to healing. In conclusion vasculitic leg ulcers can be caused by HCV infection. In such cases, even the use of innovative skin therapy, may obtain only initial and partial improvement, and eradication of HCV viremiais essential to obtain wound healing.

Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Rare and Often Misdiagnosed Cause of Rectal Bleeding in Children.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon benign rectal disorder. Typically, young adults are affected and it is rare in children. Straining during defecation, self-induced trauma and paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscle are the major contributing factors of this condition. Clinical features of SRUS are rectal bleeding, mucorrhoea, excessive straining during defecation, tenesmus, feeling of incomplete defecation and constipation. A complete and thorough history is most important for diagnosis of SRUS. Rectal bleeding may be misinterpreted as originating from an anal fissure caused by constipation or as other causes of rectal bleeding such as a juvenile polyp. The best and most accurate diagnostic method of SRUS is rectal biopsy. The major histological feature of SRUS is fibromuscular obliteration of the lamina propria. Avoiding straining, regular toilet habit, use of bulk laxatives, steroid and sucralfate enemas are the mainstay of treatment. Biofeedback mechanism is another treatment option. Because the clinical presentation varies, the diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion for both the clinician and the pathologist.

Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of chronic rectal ulcer: A case report.

RATIONALE: Rectum ulcer is a disease of the digestive system, the main symptoms of which includes bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, hematochezia, etc. At present, drug therapy and surgery are the most common treatments. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains high concentrations of platelets and has been used to promote wound healing. However, the utilization of PRP in rectal ulcers has rarely been reported. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient had reported a complaint of blood dripping from the stool for more than 4 months. She had a history of surgery for rectal cancer with postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy 19 years prior. Mesalazine suppository was given to her for about 4 months, and glutamine capsules for 2 months, but the rectal ulcer remained unhealed. DIAGNOSIS: A rectal ulcer was observed on colonoscopy, and the biopsy result was tubular adenoma. INTERVENTIONS: Autologous PRP treatment was performed for the patient under an anorectal scope together with basic supportive care. OUTCOMES: The ulcer nearly healed within 9 days after twice PRP treatments. LESSONS: PRP treatment may bring about novel treatment options for rectal ulcers.

Antibiotic prescription using a digital decision support system: a register-based study of patients with hard-to-heal ulcers in Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences in antibiotic prescription for patients with hard-to-heal ulcers assessed using a digital decision support system (DDSS) compared with those assessed without using a DDSS. A further aim was to examine predictors for antibiotic prescription. DESIGN: Register-based study. SETTING: In 2018-2019, healthcare staff in primary, community and specialist care in Sweden tested a DDSS that offers a mobile application for data and photograph transfer to a platform for multidisciplinary consultation and automatic transmission of data to the Registry of Ulcer Treatment (RUT). Register-based data from patients assessed and diagnosed using the DDSS combined with the RUT was compared with register-based data from patients whose assessments were merely registered in the RUT. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 117 patients assessed using the DDSS combined with the RUT (the study group) were compared with 1784 patients whose assessments were registered in the RUT without using the DDSS (the control group). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The differences in antibiotic prescription were analysed using the Pearson's χ2 test. A logistic regression analysis was used to check for influencing factors on antibiotic prescription. RESULTS: Patients assessed using a DDSS in combination with the RUT had significantly lower antibiotic prescription than patients entered in the RUT without using the DDSS (8% vs 26%) (p=0.002) (only healed ulcers included). Predictors for antibiotic prescription were diabetes; long healing time; having an arterial, neuropathic or malignant ulcer. CONCLUSIONS: A DDSS with data and photograph transfer that enables multidisciplinary communication appears to be a suitable tool to reduce antibiotic prescription for patients with hard-to-heal ulcers.

[Analysis of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in 7 children].

Objective: To analyze the clinical features, treatment and prognosis of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) in children. Methods: The clinical data of 7 children who were diagnosed with SRUS in Department of Gastroenterology in Guangzhou Women and Children' Medical Center from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical data including general demographics, clinical presentations, endoscopic and histologic features, treatment and outcome were extracted from hospital medical records. Results: The 7 patients were all males, and the age of onset was 6-12 years. The course before diagnosis was 2-36 months. The most common symptom was rectal bleeding (6 cases) and most common findings at initial colonoscopy were ulcer in 3 cases and protuberance in 4 cases, both located only in rectum. The intestinal histopathology of 5 cases showed characteristic fibromuscular obliteration of lamina propria. Five children were treated with mesalamine granules or suppositories, and 2 cases underwent local excision. The follow-up lasted for 5-24 months and found symptoms relieved in 5 cases, improved in 1 case, and no remission in 1 case. Colonoscopy after the treatment was performed in 5 children, among whom 2 cases achieved mucosal healing. Conclusions: SRUS in children is mainly presented with rectal bleeding, and has characteristic histological change of ulcer and protuberance in endoscopy. Pathology is crucial for diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Both the medical and surgical treatment are effective for SRUS.

Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome Is Not Always Ulcerated: A Case Report.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign and chronic disorder well known in young adults that is characterized by a series of symptoms such as rectal bleeding, copious mucus discharge, prolonged excessive straining, perineal and abdominal pain, a feeling of incomplete defecation, constipation and, rarely, rectal prolapse. The etiology of this syndrome remains obscure, and the diagnosis is easily confused with that of other diseases, contributing to difficulties in treatment. We present a case of a 37-year-old male with a nonulcerated rectal lesion grossly resembling a superficial depressed rectal cancer misdiagnosed in another hospital and describe its appearance on endoscopy and in the analysis of its pathological manifestations. The aim of this case report is to report an easily misdiagnosed case of SRUS, which needs to be distinguished from superficial rectal cancer, which should be educational for endoscopists.

Use of topical mineral powder as monotherapy for treatment of active peptic ulcer bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Hemospray (Cook Medical, Winston-Salem, NC, USA), a hemostatic powder, as monotherapy for active peptic ulcer bleeding. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, single-arm study, patients with Forrest Ia or Ib peptic ulcers underwent endoscopic application of Hemospray as treatment of first intent. Effectiveness endpoints were successful hemostasis at the end of the index endoscopy, recurrent bleeding within 72 hours and from 72 hours to 30 days, adverse events requiring reintervention or resulting in morbidity or mortality, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Hemospray was successfully administered in 98.5% of patients (66/67). Hemostasis was achieved at the index endoscopy in 90.9% of patients (60/66) with Hemospray alone and in an additional 4 patients treated with additional modalities, yielding an overall hemostasis rate of 97.0% (64/66). Rebleeding occurred in 13.3% of patients (8/60), 5 within 72 hours and 3 between 72 hours and 30 days. Two cases of perforation and 2 patient deaths occurred during the study, but none of these cases or any other adverse events were attributed to the use of Hemospray. The rate of early rebleeding was significantly higher in patients with Forrest Ia ulcers compared with patients with Forrest Ib ulcers. Higher rates of early bleeding in patients with Forrest Ia ulcers is consistent with results from studies where Hemospray was used as rescue after failure of conventional methods. CONCLUSIONS: Hemospray is an effective initial treatment for patients with active peptic ulcer bleeding, but care should be taken to monitor for recurrent bleeding. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01306864.).

Management of acute aortic syndromes from initial presentation to definitive treatment.

BACKGROUND: Acute aortic syndromes comprise a spectrum of diseases including aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers. Early diagnosis, rapid intervention, and multidisciplinary team care are vital to efficiently manage time-sensitive aortic emergencies, mobilize appropriate resources, and optimize clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This comprehensive review outlines the multidisciplinary team approach from initial presentation to definitive interventional treatment and post-operative care. DISCUSSION: Acute aortic syndromes can be life-threatening and require prompt diagnosis and aggressive initiation of blood pressure and pain control to prevent subsequent complications. Early time to diagnosis and intervention are associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary team can help promptly diagnose and manage aortic syndromes.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Post-Bulbar Ulcer Bleeding Compared to Bulbar Ulcer Bleeding in the Duodenum.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal ulcers are classified into bulbar and post-bulbar ulcers. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with post-bulbar ulcer bleeding and those with bulbar ulcer bleeding. METHODS: A total of 272 patients with hemorrhagic duodenal ulcers requiring hospitalization were included. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: All patients were categorized as bulbar or post-bulbar bleeding ulcer groups. The post-bulbar ulcer group had more patients of advanced age, concurrent malignancy, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cirrhosis, and chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis. We performed long-term follow-up for an average of 2.6 years. The mortality rate during the follow-up period in the post-bulbar ulcer group was significantly higher than that in the bulbar ulcer group (p < 0.001). The PNED score was a better predictor of 30-day mortality compared to the complete Rockall score and the Glasgow-Blatchford Score. Predictors of mortality were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. In multivariate analysis, post-bulbar ulcer, concurrent malignancy, cirrhosis, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, and transfusion were significant predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with post-bulbar ulcers have a poorer prognosis than those with bulbar ulcers. After the diagnosis of hemorrhagic post-bulbar duodenal ulcer, close follow-up is necessary.

Clinical Studies on Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Chronic Cutaneous Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Significance: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may be a potential drug for treatment of chronic refractory ulcers, which increase the risk of systemic infection and local canceration. However, the efficacy and safety of clinical application of PRP are still controversial. Thus, this study was aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of PRP in patients with chronic ulcers. Recent Advances: For this meta-analysis, Cochrane's Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL (Cumulate Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases were searched. Results were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was the proportion of completely healed chronic ulcers. Critical Issues: Seventeen randomized controlled trials were included. Compared with the control group, PRP significantly increased the fraction of healed ulcers (pooled risk ratio [RR] = 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20 to 1.87; I2 = 47.8%). In autologous PRP (APRP) and homologous PRP (HPRP) subgroups, there were statistical differences between the control group versus treatment subgroup (pooled RR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.54, I2 = 25.7%; pooled RR = 3.53, 95% CI = 1.94 to 6.43, I2 = 0.0%, respectively). In terms of percent of chronic ulcers area healed, there was a statistically significant difference between the PRP-treated group versus the control group (standard mean difference [SMD] = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.82, I2 = 22.1%). As for PRP safety, there existed a statistically significant difference between the APRP subgroup and the HPRP subgroup, respectively (pooled RR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.98; I2 = 0.0%) and (pooled RR = 4.12; 95% CI = 1.55 to 10.96; I2 = 6.8%). Future Directions: Our findings shows that PRP may be a beneficial treatment of chronic skin ulcers and that APRP may be much safer than HPRP.

Real world management of esophageal ulcers: analysis of their presentation, etiology, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Esophageal ulcers are a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal morbidity and may be due to different etiologies. We sought to systematically evaluate patients with esophageal ulcers and describe their presentations, endoscopic findings, etiologies, treatments, and outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal ulcers over an 11-year period were retrospectively identified from our institution's electronic medical records. RESULTS: We identified 100 patients with esophageal ulcers (0.49% of patients undergoing upper endoscopy). Half of them presented due to gastrointestinal bleeding and three-quarters were admitted to the hospital. The majority were in the lower esophagus. Twenty-two unique etiologies, including multiple iatrogenic causes, were diagnosed in 91 of the cases. The most common etiology was gastroesophageal reflux disease (57%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (7%), malignancies (3%), vomiting (3%), caustic ingestion (2%), pill esophagitis (2%) and radiation (2%). Many etiologies showed a predilection for specific segments of the esophagus. Nine ulcers required endoscopic intervention and all were treated successfully. Repeat endoscopies were performed 5 times for diagnostic or "second look" reasons, none of which changed the patients' diagnosis or treatment. No patients required surgery or stricture dilation. One patient's ulcer was complicated by perforation and he subsequently died. Four other patients died from non-ulcer related causes. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of ulcers were due to gastroesophageal reflux disease, 22 different etiologies were identified. Many were due to medication or iatrogenic causes. Repeat endoscopy did not appear to be helpful. While the incidence was low, they were frequently associated with significant morbidity.

Intra-lesionally autologous stem cell application in diabetic foot/ulcer.

The diabetic fot/ulcer is the cause of high morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Generally, medical treatment of diabetic foot/ulcer is ineffective and stem cell implantation is an important option in the treatment. Here, we present a 69 years old man admitted to hospital due to a 3 × 4 cm wound in the plantar surface of left foot. Autologous stem cells were applied intralesionally into diabetic ulcers. The lesion shrunken 50 % at the 16th week and there is a wound under the left foot at 32nd week. Intralesionally autologous stem cell application was useful and safe without adverse course in patients with diabetic foot/ulcer.