Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.859
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 15: 21501319241251934, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38726652

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Despite U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and American Cancer Society endorsement of primary HPV screening, limited published data shows low uptake. PRIMARY AIM: Assess cervical cancer screening rates over time, particularly primary HPV test uptake, among patients in a midwestern practice. SECONDARY AIM: Evaluate associations between sociodemographics and screening adherence. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Qualifying subjects and type of screening test used were identified by applying ICD-9, ICD-10, lab test, and CPT codes to the Unified Data Platform. Sociodemographics were found through the electronic health record. RESULTS: Primary HPV uptake represented <1% of annual screening from 1/2017 to 1/2022. On 1/1/2022, only 55% of 21 to 29 year old and 63% of 30 to 65 year old were up to date with screening among the studied population. For 21 to 29 year old, compared with White women, Black women were 28% less likely to be screened [RR = 0.72 (0.66-0.79)]. Compared with never-smokers, current smokers were 9% less likely to be screened [RR = 0.91 (0.87-0.96)], past smokers were 14% more likely [RR = 1.14 (1.09-1.2)]. Among 30 to 65 year old, compared with White women, Black women were 14% less likely to be screened [RR = 0.86 (0.81-0.9)]. Compared with never-smokers, current smokers were 21% less likely to be screened [RR = 0.79 (0.77-0.81)], past smokers were 6% less likely [RR = 0.94 (0.92-0.95)]. Jointly considering race, ethnicity, smoking status, Charlson score, and rurality, findings were similar for 21 to 29 year old; Black women were screened less than White women [RR = 0.73 (0.67-0.79)]; current smokers [RR = 0.9 (0.85-0.94)] and past smokers [RR = 1.12 (1.06-1.17)] were screened less than never smokers. For 30 to 65 year old, Black women were screened less than White women [RR = 0.83 (0.79-0.88)]; current smokers [RR = 0.8 (0.78-0.81)] and past smokers [RR = 0.95 (0.93-0.96)] were screened less than never smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Screening rates remained below the Healthy People 2030 goal of 79.2% over time, particularly for younger Black women and current smokers, with minimal use of primary HPV screening.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Idoso , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Papillomavirus Humano
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2347018, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708779

RESUMO

HPV vaccination coverage remains far below the national target of 80% among US adolescents, particularly in rural areas, which have vaccine uptake rates that are 10% points lower than non-rural areas on average. Primary care professionals (PCPs) can increase coverage by using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination in a way that assumes parents want to vaccinate. Through semi-structured interviews, we explored PCPs' experiences and perceptions of using presumptive recommendations in rural- and non-rural-serving primary care clinics in North Carolina. Thematic analysis revealed that most PCPs in rural and non-rural contexts used presumptive recommendations and felt the strategy was an effective and concise way to introduce the topic of HPV vaccination to parents. At the same time, some PCPs raised concerns about presumptive recommendations potentially straining relationships with certain parents, including those who had previously declined HPV vaccine or who distrust medical authority due to their past experiences with the healthcare system. PCPs dealt with these challenges by using a more open-ended approach when introducing HPV vaccination to parents. In conclusion, our findings suggest that PCPs in both rural and non-rural settings see value in using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination, but to adequately address concerns and ensure increased HPV vaccine uptake, PCPs can use simple and culturally sensitive language to ensure fully informed consent and to maintain parental trust. And to further strengthen HPV vaccine discussions, PCPs can utilize other effective HPV communication techniques, like the Announcement Approach, in discussing HPV vaccinations with hesitant parents.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Pais , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Pesquisa Qualitativa , População Rural , Vacinação , Humanos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/psicologia , Adolescente , Pais/psicologia , North Carolina , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Entrevistas como Assunto
3.
J Headache Pain ; 25(1): 73, 2024 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714920

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is complex requiring contributions from multiple specialized disciplines. In practice, this creates considerable organizational and communicational challenges. To meet those challenges, we established an interdisciplinary integrated outpatient clinic for IIH with a central coordination and a one-stop- concept. Here, we aimed to evaluate effects of this concept on sick leave, presenteeism, and health care utilization. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we compared the one-stop era with integrated care (IC, 1-JUL-2021 to 31-DEC-2022) to a reference group receiving standard care (SC, 1-JUL-2018 to 31-DEC-2019) regarding economic outcome parameters assessed over 6 months. Multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the IC group (n = 85) and SC group (n = 81) were comparable (female: 90.6% vs. 90.1%; mean age: 33.6 vs. 32.8 years, educational level: ≥9 years of education 60.0% vs. 59.3%; located in Vienna 75.3% vs. 76.5%). Compared to SC, the IC group showed significantly fewer days with sick leave or presenteeism (-5 days/month), fewer unscheduled contacts for IIH-specific problems (-2.3/month), and fewer physician or hospital contacts in general (-4.1 contacts/month). Subgroup analyses of patients with migration background and language barrier consistently indicated stronger effects of the IC concept in these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary integrated management significantly improves the burden of IIH in terms of sick leave, presenteeism and healthcare consultations - particularly in socioeconomically underprivileged patient groups.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Presenteísmo , Pseudotumor Cerebral , Licença Médica , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Presenteísmo/estatística & dados numéricos , Pseudotumor Cerebral/terapia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
4.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 556, 2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693557

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Long waiting times for elective hospital treatments are common in many countries. This study seeks to address a deficit in the literature concerning the effect of long waits on the wider consumption of healthcare resources. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective treatment-control study in a healthcare system in South West England from 15 June 2021 to 15 December 2021. We compared weekly contacts with health services of patients waiting over 18 weeks for treatment ('Treatments') and people not on a waiting list ('Controls'). Controls were matched to Treatments based on age, sex, deprivation and multimorbidity. Treatments were stratified by the clinical specialty of the awaited hospital treatment, with healthcare usage assessed over various healthcare settings. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests assessed whether there was an increase in healthcare utilisation and bootstrap resampling was used to estimate the magnitude of any differences. RESULTS: A total of 44,616 patients were waiting over 18 weeks (the constitutional target in England) for treatment during the study period. There was an increase (p < 0.0004) in healthcare utilisation for all specialties. Patients in the Cardiothoracic Surgery specialty had the largest increase, with 17.9 [interquartile-range: 4.3, 33.8] additional contacts with secondary care and 17.3 [-1.1, 34.1] additional prescriptions per year. CONCLUSION: People waiting for treatment consume higher levels of healthcare than comparable individuals not on a waiting list. These findings are relevant for clinicians and managers in better understanding patient need and reducing harm. Results also highlight the possible 'false economy' in failing to promptly resolve long elective waits.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Idoso , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inglaterra , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Reino Unido
5.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 30(5): 430-440, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701030

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia. However, published studies of CLL have either only focused on costs among individuals diagnosed with CLL without a non-CLL comparator group or focused on costs associated with specific CLL treatments. An examination of utilization and costs across different care settings provides a holistic view of utilization associated with CLL. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the health care costs and resource utilization types attributable to CLL among Medicare beneficiaries and identify predictors associated with each of the economic outcomes among beneficiaries diagnosed with CLL. METHODS: This retrospective study used a random 20% sample of the Medicare Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW) database covering the 2017-2019 period. The study population consisted of individuals with and without CLL. The CLL cohort and non-CLL cohort were matched using a 1:5 hard match based on baseline categorical variables. We characterized economic outcomes over 360 days across cost categories and places of services. We estimated average marginal effects using multivariable generalized linear regression models of total costs and across type of services. Total cost was compared between CLL and non-CLL cohorts using the matched sample. We used generalized linear models appropriate for the count or binary outcome to identify factors associated with various categories of health care resource utilization, such as inpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and oncologist/hematologist visits. RESULTS: A total of 2,736 beneficiaries in the CLL cohort and 13,571 beneficiaries in the non-CLL matched cohort were identified. Compared with the non-CLL cohort, the annual cost for the CLL cohort was higher (CLL vs non-CLL, mean [SD]: $22,781 [$37,592] vs $13,901 [$24,725]), mainly driven by health care provider costs ($6,535 vs $3,915) and Part D prescription drug costs ($5,916 vs $2,556). The main categories of health care resource utilization were physician evaluation/management visits, oncologist/hematologist visits, and laboratory services. Compared with beneficiaries aged 65-74 years, beneficiaries aged 85 years or older had lower use and cost in maintenance services (ie, oncologist visits, hospital outpatient costs, and prescription drug cost) but higher use and cost in acute services (ie, ED). Compared with residency in a metropolitan area, living in a nonmetropolitan area was associated with fewer physician visits but higher ED visits and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The cooccurrence of lower utilization of routine care services, along with higher utilization of acute care services among some individuals, has implications for patient burden and warrants further study.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B , Medicare , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/economia , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/terapia , Estados Unidos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1321253, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711762

RESUMO

Introduction: Women's adherence to the United States (U.S.) Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for cervical cancer screening was determined by examining predisposing, enabling, and needs factors from Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use conceptual framework. Methods: The outcome was operationalized as cervical cancer screening use, non-use, and inadequate-use. Multinomial logistic regression was conducted on data from the 2019 National Health Interview Survey of 7,331 eligible women aged 21-65. Results: Compared with women who used cervical cancer screening services, women aged 30-65 were less likely to be Non-Users than those aged 21-29. Hispanic, Asian, and American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) women were more likely to be Non-Users than White women. More educated women were less likely to be Non-Users. Foreign-born women <10 years in the U.S. were more likely to be Non-Users than U.S.-born women. Women with financial hardship were less likely to be Non-Users. Poorer women and uninsured women were more likely to be Non-Users. Women with children in their household were less likely to be Non-Users than those without children. Women who had a well-visit in the past year were less likely to be Non-Users. Women with a history of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination were less likely to be Non-Users. Compared with women who used cervical cancer screening services, women aged 30-65 were less likely to be Inadequate-Users. AIAN women were more likely to be Inadequate-Users. Women of other races were less likely to be Inadequate-Users. Employed women were less likely to be Inadequate-Users. Uninsured women were more likely to be Inadequate-Users. Women who had a well-visit within a year were less likely to be Inadequate-Users. Women with past HPV vaccination were more likely to be Inadequate-Users. Smokers were less likely to be Inadequate-Users. Discussion: Predisposing, enabling, and needs factors are differently associated with non-use and inadequate use of cervical cancer screening. Understanding factors associated with the use, non-use, and inadequate use of cervical cancer screening is crucial to avoid or curb unnecessary tests, increased costs to both society and individuals, and the ill-allocation of limited resources.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Adulto , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Aust J Prim Health ; 302024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739739

RESUMO

Background Globally, frailty is associated with a high prevalence of avoidable hospital admissions and emergency department visits, with substantial associated healthcare and personal costs. International guidelines recommend incorporation of frailty identification and care planning into routine primary care workflow to support patients who may be identified as pre-frail/frail. Our study aimed to: (1) determine the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness and determinants of implementing a validated FRAIL Scale screening Tool into general practices in two disparate Australian regions (Sydney North and Brisbane South); and (2) map the resources and referral options required to support frailty management and potential reversal. Methods Using the FRAIL Scale Tool, practices screened eligible patients (aged ≥75years) for risk of frailty and referred to associated management options. The percentage of patients identified as frail/pre-frail, and management options and referrals made by practice staff for those identified as frail/pre-frail were recorded. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with practice staff to understand the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness and determinants of implementing the Tool. Results The Tool was implemented by 19 general practices in two Primary Health Networks and 1071 consenting patients were assessed. Overall, 80% of patients (n =860) met the criterion for frailty: 33% of patients (n =352) were frail, and 47% were pre-frail (n =508). They were predominantly then referred for exercise prescription, medication reviews and geriatric assessment. The Tool was acceptable to staff and patients and compatible with practice workflows. Conclusions This study demonstrates that frailty is identified frequently in Australians aged ≥75years who visit their general practice. It's identification, linked with management support to reverse or reduce frailty risk, can be readily incorporated into the Medicare-funded annual 75+ Health Assessment.


Assuntos
Estudos de Viabilidade , Idoso Fragilizado , Medicina Geral , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Medicina Geral/métodos , Austrália , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , População Australasiana
9.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1104, 2024 Apr 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649876

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the acceptability and attitudes of women towards human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling and compare the effectiveness of two delivery modes utilising face-to-face and online website for cervical cancer screening in Hong Kong. METHODS: Women aged 30-65 years were invited to participate by distributing the study information pamphlets at the specialist clinics of a regional acute hospital. Those who were interested in participating were given the option to join directly face-to-face or through an online website. All participants provided informed consent and received self-sampling kits and acceptability questionnaires either immediately (face-to-face) or through the post after registering at the website (online). All participants were requested to collect their own vaginal samples using a swab which was then brushed on a DNA sample storage card and returned to the hospital either in person or by post. The self-collected samples were tested for high-risk HPV using the Sentis™ HPV assay, a validated isothermal nucleic acid amplification real-time fluorescent detection assay. The primary outcome was the uptake rate of HPV self-sampling. RESULTS: Of the 1998 women recruited (1200 face-to-face, 798 online), 1377 returned their samples, giving an overall uptake rate of 68.9%. The uptake rate was significantly greater in the face-to-face mode than in the online mode (74.6% vs. 60.4%, p < 0.001). The median age of the participants was 49 years, 43.7% were never or under-screened, and 7.1% had high-risk HPV detected. Overall, 82.1% of the participants reported self-sampling convenient, and 79.3% were not embarrassed when collecting self-samples. However, only 49.8% were confident that they had collected the self-samples correctly. Most (91.1%) of the participants expressed willingness to perform self-sampling again, mostly because it was simple (79.2%) and quick (56.3%). CONCLUSIONS: HPV self-sampling can serve as an alternative primary screening method for cervical cancer in Hong Kong, especially for individuals who have not been adequately screened in the past. Both face-to-face and online website recruitment were associated with high acceptability, emphasising the potential benefits of utilising different platforms and strategies for reaching diverse populations.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Manejo de Espécimes , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Hong Kong , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Autocuidado , Internet , Esfregaço Vaginal/métodos , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Papillomavirus Humano
10.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 253, 2024 Apr 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654200

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since 2020, China has actively promoted HPV vaccination for eligible adolescent girls through various pilot programmes. This study investigated parental willingness and hesitancy towards the government-sponsored, free human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for eligible adolescent girls in Shenzhen, Southern China. METHODS: From June to August 2022, a cross-sectional survey was conducted with parents of girls entering Grade 7, employing an adapted Vaccine Hesitancy Scale to assess vaccine hesitancy and logistic regression to identify factors influencing willingness to accept the free domestic vaccines. RESULTS: Although only 3.4% of the 2856 respondents had their daughters vaccinated against HPV prior to the survey, 91.7% were willing to utilise the governmental vaccination services. Parents with children in public schools (χ2 = 20.08, p < 0.001), those with more secure medical insurance (χ2 = 4.97, p = 0.026), and parents who had received an HPV vaccine themselves (χ2 = 28.829, p < 0.001) showed more reluctance towards the free vaccines. Vaccine hesitancy was presented in a mere 2.1% but was a significant predictor of vaccine refusal, even after adjusting for multiple factors (adjusted OR = 15.98, 95% CI: 9.06, 28.20). Notably, about four-fifths of parents of unvaccinated daughters harboured concerns about the safety and efficacy of the domestic vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Although parents show a strong inclination to utilise the government vaccination services, their vaccine hesitancy, driven by safety concerns and a preference for imported vaccines, remains a significant barrier for rolling out vaccination coverage. This study highlights the need for multifaceted intervention strategies that address these issues to enhance HPV vaccine uptake effectively.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Pais , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Hesitação Vacinal , Humanos , Feminino , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , China , Adolescente , Estudos Transversais , Pais/psicologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/psicologia , Adulto , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hesitação Vacinal/psicologia , Hesitação Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Criança , Papillomavirus Humano
11.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 15: 21501319241247974, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650519

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Patients with pre-transplant metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) are at high risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) after liver transplant. While many patients are co-managed by a transplant team, most preventative screening and MetS management may occur in the primary care setting. We aimed to evaluate primary care utilization by MASH liver transplant recipients as well as MetS screening and control. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review that included adults who underwent liver transplant for MASH or cryptogenic cirrhosis at a single institution from January 2010 to December 2016, had available primary care data, and at least 36-months of follow-up post-transplant. Measures included primary care utilization, adherence to screening guidelines, and control of MetS. We used Fischer's exact test to explore the association of primary care utilization with screening and control. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients met inclusion criteria with 366 visits reviewed. The median time to first visit was 68 days post-transplant and patients had a median of 9 total visits. Few patients met screening guidelines for diabetes (8.1%) or hyperlipidemia (10.8%). The percentage of patients with control of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia decreased over the 36-month follow-up period. Primary care utilization was not associated with adherence to screening recommendations for diabetes (P = .141) or hyperlipidemia (P = .103). Higher primary care utilization was not associated with control of hypertension (P = .107), diabetes (P = .871), or hyperlipidemia (P = .999). CONCLUSION: More research is needed to investigate barriers to screening and management of MetS conditions in this high-risk patient population in the primary care setting as well as to optimize post-transplant care coordination.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Síndrome Metabólica , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Transplantados , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fígado Gorduroso , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hiperlipidemias
12.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 256, 2024 Apr 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658945

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This scoping review aimed to identify and present the evidence describing key motivations for breast cancer screening among women aged ≥ 75 years. Few of the internationally available guidelines recommend continued biennial screening for this age group. Some suggest ongoing screening is unnecessary or should be determined on individual health status and life expectancy. Recent research has shown that despite recommendations regarding screening, older women continue to hold positive attitudes to breast screening and participate when the opportunity is available. METHODS: All original research articles that address motivation, intention and/or participation in screening for breast cancer among women aged ≥ 75 years were considered for inclusion. These included articles reporting on women who use public and private breast cancer screening services and those who do not use screening services (i.e., non-screeners). The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews was used to guide this review. A comprehensive search strategy was developed with the assistance of a specialist librarian to access selected databases including: the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Web of Science and PsychInfo. The review was restricted to original research studies published since 2009, available in English and focusing on high-income countries (as defined by the World Bank). Title and abstract screening, followed by an assessment of full-text studies against the inclusion criteria was completed by at least two reviewers. Data relating to key motivations, screening intention and behaviour were extracted, and a thematic analysis of study findings undertaken. RESULTS: A total of fourteen (14) studies were included in the review. Thematic analysis resulted in identification of three themes from included studies highlighting that decisions about screening were influenced by: knowledge of the benefits and harms of screening and their relationship to age; underlying attitudes to the importance of cancer screening in women's lives; and use of decision aids to improve knowledge and guide decision-making. CONCLUSION: The results of this review provide a comprehensive overview of current knowledge regarding the motivations and screening behaviour of older women about breast cancer screening which may inform policy development.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Motivação , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/psicologia , Mamografia/psicologia , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Programas de Rastreamento/psicologia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos
13.
BMC Res Notes ; 17(1): 112, 2024 Apr 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644484

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy and among the most common malignancies in young adults and requires a unique pattern of healthcare utilization including an acute/emergent presentation and an intensive initial 8 months of therapy followed by two years of outpatient treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic caused massive global disruptions in healthcare use and delivery. This report aims to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation, diagnosis and continued management of childhood and young adult ALL in regard to utilization and cost of care among commercially insured individuals in the United States. RESULTS: Utilizing a commercial insurance claims database, 529 pediatric and young adult patients were identified who were diagnosed with ALL between January 2016 and March 2021. New diagnoses were evaluated by era and demographics. Utilization was measured by COVID-related era as number of inpatient and outpatient encounters, inpatient days, and cumulative cost during the initial 8 months of therapy. None of these cost or utilization factors changed significantly during or shortly after the pandemic. These findings reinforce that the necessary care for pediatric and young adult ALL was unwavering despite the massive shifts in the healthcare system caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This provides a valuable benchmark as we further examine the factors that influence the pandemic's impact on health equity and access to care, especially in vulnerable pediatric and young adult populations. This is the first investigation of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on utilization and cost of care in pediatric and young adult cancer.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/economia , Criança , Adolescente , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/economia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pré-Escolar , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias/economia
14.
Sex Health ; 212024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683939

RESUMO

Background Anal cancer disproportionately affects sexual and gender minority individuals living with HIV. High-resolution anoscopy (HRA) is an in-clinic procedure to detect precancerous anal lesions and cancer, yet prospective data on factors associated with HRA attendance are lacking. We examined whether anal HPV sampling at home versus in a clinic impacts HRA uptake and assessed HRA acceptability. Methods Sexual and gender minority individuals were randomised to home-based self-sampling or clinical sampling. All were asked to attend in-clinic HRA 1year later. We regressed HRA attendance on study arm using multivariable Poisson regression and assessed HRA acceptability using χ 2 tests. Results A total of 62.8% of 196 participants who engaged in screening attended HRA. Although not significant (P =0.13), a higher proportion of participants who engaged in clinic-based screening attended HRA (68.5%) compared to home-based participants (57.9%). Overall, HRA uptake was higher among participants with anal cytology history (aRR 1.40, 95% CI 1.07-1.82), and lower among participants preferring a versatile anal sex position versus insertive (aRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.91), but did not differ by race or HIV serostatus. In the clinic arm, persons living with HIV had lower HRA attendance (42.9%) versus HIV-negative participants (73.3%) (P =0.02) and Black non-Hispanic participants had lower HRA attendance (41.7%) than White non-Hispanic participants (73.1%), (P =0.04). No differences in attendance by race or HIV status were observed in the home arm. Conclusions HRA uptake differed significantly by race and HIV status in the clinic arm but not the home arm.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Ânus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias do Ânus/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Ânus/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Ânus/virologia , Feminino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Canal Anal/virologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Proctoscopia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Autocuidado , Papillomavirus Humano
15.
Breast Cancer Res ; 26(1): 73, 2024 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38685119

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Following a breast cancer diagnosis, it is uncertain whether women's breast density knowledge influences their willingness to undergo pre-operative imaging to detect additional cancer in their breasts. We evaluated women's breast density knowledge and their willingness to delay treatment for pre-operative testing. METHODS: We surveyed women identified in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium aged ≥ 18 years, with first breast cancer diagnosed within the prior 6-18 months, who had at least one breast density measurement within the 5 years prior to their diagnosis. We assessed women's breast density knowledge and correlates of willingness to delay treatment for 6 or more weeks for pre-operative imaging via logistic regression. RESULTS: Survey participation was 28.3% (969/3,430). Seventy-two percent (469/647) of women with dense and 11% (34/322) with non-dense breasts correctly knew their density (p < 0.001); 69% (665/969) of all women knew dense breasts make it harder to detect cancers on a mammogram; and 29% (285/969) were willing to delay treatment ≥ 6 weeks to undergo pre-operative imaging. Willingness to delay treatment did not differ by self-reported density (OR:0.99 for non-dense vs. dense; 95%CI: 0.50-1.96). Treatment with chemotherapy was associated with less willingness to delay treatment (OR:0.67; 95%CI: 0.46-0.96). Having previously delayed breast cancer treatment more than 3 months was associated with an increased willingness to delay treatment for pre-operative imaging (OR:2.18; 95%CI: 1.26-3.77). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding of personal breast density was not associated with willingness to delay treatment 6 or more weeks for pre-operative imaging, but aspects of a woman's treatment experience were. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV : NCT02980848 registered December 2, 2016.


Assuntos
Densidade da Mama , Neoplasias da Mama , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Mamografia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mamografia/psicologia , Idoso , Adulto , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Inquéritos e Questionários , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/psicologia
16.
Head Neck ; 46(6): 1439-1449, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38558155

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine trends in the healthcare utilization by Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal cancer patients across emergency department (ED) and outpatient settings in Alberta and examine the predictors of ED visits. METHODS: This is a retrospective, population-based, cohort study using administrative data collected by all healthcare facilities between 2010 and 2019 in Alberta, Canada. Trend of visits to different facilities, patients' primary diagnosis, and predictors of ED visits were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 34% of patients had at least one cancer-related ED visit. With a rise of 31% in cancer incidence, there was a notable upswing in visits to outpatient clinics and community offices, while ED visits decreased. Cancer stage, rural residence, high material deprivation score, and treatments were found as predictors of ED visits. CONCLUSION: Improved symptom management and better care access for disadvantaged and rural oral cancer patients may decrease avoidable ED visits.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Neoplasias Bucais , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Alberta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Bucais/terapia , Neoplasias Bucais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
17.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 24(5): e181-e190, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38433043

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little recent real-world evidence exists on overall survival, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs among R/R DLBCL patients treated with the combination of rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx), a widely-used regimen for patients ineligible for stem cell transplant due to age or comorbidities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis used 2014 to 2019 U.S. Medicare claims. Individuals aged ≥66 years with a new DLBCL diagnosis between October 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 and continuous fee-for-service Medicare Part A, B, and D coverage in the 12 months pre- and postindex were followed to identify the sample of patients with evidence of R-GemOx treatment in the second-line (2L) or third-line (3L) setting. Outcomes included overall survival, all-cause and DLBCL-related HCRU, and costs after R-GemOx initiation. RESULTS: The final sample included 157 patients who received treatment with R-GemOx in the R/R settings (mean (SD) age 77.5 (6.0) years, 39.5% age>80 years; 66.9% male; 91.1% White). Of these, 126 received R-GemOx in the 2L setting and 31 received R-GemOx in the 3L setting. Median overall survival from R-GemOx initiation was 6.9 months and 6.8 months in the 2L and 3L setting, respectively. Rates of all-cause hospitalization (68.1% [2L] and >90% [3L]) and hospice use (42.9% [2L] and 51.7% [3L]) were high in the 12 months after R-GemOx initiation. All-cause total costs were substantial ($144,653 [2L] and $142,812 [3L]) and approximately 80% of costs were DLBCL-related within 12 months of R-GemOx initiation. CONCLUSION: Elderly U.S. Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with DLBCL who initiated R-GemOx treatment in the R/R setting have poor overall survival, high rates of HCRU, and substantial costs.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/mortalidade , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gencitabina , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Oxaliplatina/uso terapêutico , Oxaliplatina/economia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Rituximab/economia , Medicare
18.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 24(5): e205-e216, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453615

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To report healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and safety outcomes in systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis from the EMN23 study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective, observational, multinational EMN23 study included 4,480 patients initiating first-line treatment for AL amyloidosis in 2004-2018 and assessed, among other objectives, HCRU and safety outcomes. HCRU included hospitalizations, examinations, and dialysis; safety included serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESIs). Data were descriptively analyzed by select prognostic factors (e.g., cardiac staging by Mayo2004/European) for 2004-2010 and 2011-2018. A cost-of-illness analysis was conducted for the UK and Spain. RESULTS: HCRU/safety and dialysis data were extracted for 674 and 774 patients, respectively. Of patients with assessed cardiac stage (2004-2010: 159; 2011-2018: 387), 67.9% and 61.0% had ≥ 1 hospitalization, 56.0% and 51.4% had ≥ 1 SAE, and 31.4% and 28.9% had ≥ 1 AESI across all cardiac stages in 2004-2010 and 2011-2018, respectively. The per-patient-per-year length of hospitalization increased with disease severity (cardiac stage). Of patients with dialysis data (2004-2010: 176; 2011-2018: 453), 23.9% and 14.8% had ≥ 1 dialysis session across all cardiac stages in 2004-2010 and 2011-2018, respectively. The annual cost-of-illness was estimated at €40,961,066 and €31,904,386 for the UK and Spain, respectively; dialysis accounted for ∼28% (UK) and ∼35% (Spain) of the total AL amyloidosis costs. CONCLUSIONS: EMN23 showed that the burden of AL amyloidosis is substantial, highlighting the need for early disease diagnosis and effective treatments targeting the underlying pathology.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Amiloidose de Cadeia Leve de Imunoglobulina , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Amiloidose de Cadeia Leve de Imunoglobulina/terapia , Amiloidose de Cadeia Leve de Imunoglobulina/economia , Idoso , Europa (Continente) , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
19.
Maturitas ; 184: 107965, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38460416

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is critical to the overall health of older adults. We assessed the utilization of SRH services and its correlates among older adults in China. METHODS: We recruited community-dwelling adults aged 50 and above in five Chinese cities between June 2020 and December 2022. In this study SRH services included reproductive health examination, cervical cancer screening, and sexual life counselling. Logistic regression was used to assess correlates of SRH services utilization. RESULTS: A total of 3001 older adults (1819 men and 1182 women) were enrolled. Among them, 11.4 % (343/3001) of participants received a reproductive health examination, 35.4 % (418/1182) of female participants received cervical cancer screening, and 30.1 % (401/1332) of sexually active participants sought help for their sexual lives. Older men with an annual income of USD 7500 or more (aOR = 3.21, 95%CI: 1.39-7.44), two or more chronic conditions (2.38, 1.39-4.08), and reproductive health problems (2.01, 1.18-3.43) were more likely to receive a urological examination. For older women, individuals who were younger (aged 50-59 years: 5.18, 2.84-9.43; aged 60-69 years: 2.67, 1.49-4.79), lived in an urban area (1.88, 1.31-2.71), were employed (1.73, 1.21-2.47), had two or more chronic conditions (2.04, 1.37-3.05), were sexually active (1.72, 1.15-2.58) and talked about sex (1.69, 1.21-2.36) were more likely to receive a gynecological examination. CONCLUSION: SRH services utilization among older adults was low, with urological examination among older men particularly low. SRH messages and services tailored for older adults are needed to enhance their utilization of SRH services.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , China , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Reprodutiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 30(5): 542.e1-542.e29, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331192

RESUMO

This scoping review summarizes the evidence regarding healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This study was conducted in accordance with the Joanne Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The PubMed, Embase, and Health Business Elite Electronic databases were searched, in addition to grey literature. The databases were searched from inception up to November 2022. Studies that reported HRU and/or costs associated with adult (≥18 years) allo-HSCT were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened 20% of the sample at each of the 2 stages of screening (abstract and full text). Details of the HRU and costs extracted from the study data were summarized, based on the elements and timeframes reported. HRU measures and costs were combined across studies reporting results defined in a comparable manner. Monetary values were standardized to 2022 US Dollars (USD). We identified 43 studies that reported HRU, costs, or both for allo-HSCT. Of these studies, 93.0% reported on costs, 81.4% reported on HRU, and 74.4% reported on both. HRU measures and cost calculations, including the timeframe for which they were reported, were heterogeneous across the studies. Length of hospital stay was the most frequently reported HRU measure (76.7% of studies) and ranged from a median initial hospitalization of 10 days (reduced-intensity conditioning [RIC]) to 73 days (myeloablative conditioning). The total cost of an allo-HSCT ranged from $63,096 (RIC) to $782,190 (double umbilical cord blood transplantation) at 100 days and from $69,218 (RIC) to $637,193 at 1 year (not stratified). There is heterogeneity in the reporting of HRU and costs associated with allo-HSCT in the literature, making it difficult for clinicians, policymakers, and governments to draw definitive conclusions regarding the resources required for the delivery of these services. Nevertheless, to ensure that access to healthcare meets the necessary high cost and resource demands of allo-HSCT, it is imperative for clinicians, policymakers, and government officials to be aware of both the short- and long-term health resource requirements for this patient population. Further research is needed to understand the key determinants of HRU and costs associated with allo-HSCT to better inform the design and delivery of health care for HSCT recipients and ensure the quality, safety, and efficiency of care.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/economia , Humanos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante Homólogo/economia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA