[Application of metal cushion block combined with Jumbo cup in reconstruction of acetabular bone defect in revision of artificial hip joint].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application effect and imaging changes of metal cushion block combined with Jumbo cup in the reconstruction of acetabular bone defect after revision of artificial hip joint. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 83 patients who underwent revision acetabular bone defect reconstruction of the artificial hip joint in our hospital from September 2019 to October 2021. They were divided into group A and group B according to different surgical methods. There were 42 patients in group A, including 26 males and 16 females, aged from 44 to 72 years old with an average of (60.57±4.62) years, who underwent revision with metal cushion block and Jumbo cup. There were 41 patients in group B, including 22 males and 19 females, aged from 42 to 71 years old with an average of (58.74±4.25) years, who underwent revision with metal cushion block and bone cement mortar cup. The operation related indexes, Harris hip function score and visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain before operation, 1 month and 12 month after operation were compared between two groups. The results of X-ray imaging examination (hip rotation center height, acetabular abduction angle, femoral eccentricity and imaging standard qualification rate) before and 12 month after operation were evaluated, and the incidence of complications was compared between two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume and postoperative drainage volume between two groups (P>0.05). Both groups were followed up for 12 to 36 months with an average of (25.36±3.59) months. The scores of pain, function, deformity and Harris' total score in the two groups at 1 month after operation were higher than those before operation (P<0.05), and the scores of pain, function, deformity, joint activity and Harris' total score in two groups at 1 year after operation were higher than those before operation and 1 month after operation (P<0.05), and the above scores in group A were higher than those in group B at 1 year after operation (P<0.05). The VAS of two groups decreased successively at 1 month and 1 year after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in both groups at each time point (P>0.05). The femoral eccentricity increased in both groups at 1 year after operation (P<0.05), and group A was higher than group B (P<0.05). The height of rotation center and acetabular abduction angle decreased in both groups at 1 year after operation (P<0.05), and the height of rotation center in group A was lower than that in group B (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in acetabular abduction angle between two groups (P>0.05). The imaging qualification rate of group A was higher than that of group B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Metal cushion block combined with Jumbo cup in the treatment of acetabular bone defects can provide the hip joint function, and restore the hip joint rotation center, femoral eccentricity and acetabular abduction angle, with obvious clinical effect.

[Hip joint biomechanical analysis of the acetabular anatomical reconstruction and nonanatomical reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type â ¢ developmental dysplasia of the hip by finite element method].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the hip joint biomechanics of the acetabular anatomical reconstruction and nonanatomical reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for Crowe type Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) by finite element method, which provided theoretical foundation and experimental basis for the anatomical acetabular reconstruction during THA in clinical practice. METHODS: One patient with left end-stage hip arthritis secondary to Crowe type Ⅲ DDH was selected in this study, who underwent total hip arthroplasty in the orthopedic department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College in April 2020. This patient was female, 57 years old. The preoperative and postoperative three dimentional CT scan of the patient's pelvis were performed. Fourteen acetabular cup models with different anteversion, inclination and rotation center height were established in Mimics and 3-Matic software. The boundary and load conditions were set in Abaqus software. The Von Mises and stress distribution of the hip joint were calculated and observed. RESULTS: In the Crowe type Ⅲ DDH THA, if the hip rotation center was restored anatomically and the acetabular cup's inclination was set as 40°, the cup's anteversion varied from 5° to 25°, the lowest Von Mises value of acetabular cup and polyethylene liner occured in 20°anteversioin;if the hip rotation center was restored anatomically and the acetabular cup's anteversion was set as 15°, the cup's inclination varied from 35° to 55°, the lowest Von Mises value of acetabular cup and polyethylene liner occured in 35° inclination;if the acetabular cup's anteversion and inclination were set as 15°and 40°respectively, the up migration of hip rotaion center varied from 0 mm to 20 mm, the lowest Von Mises value of acetabular cup and polyethylene liner occured in 10 mm up migration. In all fourteen models, the Von Mises value of the acetabulum, acetabulum cup and polyethylene liner were lowest when the acetabular cup's anteversion and inlcination were 15°, 35° respectively, as well as the rotation center was restored anatomically. CONCLUSION: In total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type Ⅲ DDH, the anatomical restoration of hip rotation center with 15° anteversion and 35° inclination of the acetabular cup are suggested, bone graft above the acetabular cup and additional screws are recommended simultaneously to further reduce the Von Mises of hip joint.

Ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block to position the patient for neuraxial anaesthesia in acetabular surgery - a randomized controlled pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Neuraxial anaesthesia is a common choice for most hip and lower limb operations. Pain associated with positioning is often a deterrent, and the vast literature suggests different regional blocks and opioids for these patients. Patients with acetabular fractures may experience increased pain, and thus are more difficult to position for the neuraxial block. We conducted a randomized controlled pilot study to assess and compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFICB) versus systemic fentanyl to facilitate positioning for combined spinal epidural (CSE) anaesthesia in patients undergoing acetabular fracture surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients referred for surgical repair of acetabular fractures were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided SFICB (group B) or intravenous fentanyl (group F). Changes in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in supine and sitting position, improvement in sitting angle (SA), positioning quality, rescue analgesic requirement, total opioid consumption, comfort VAS scores, and complications were noted to compare both groups. RESULTS: The post-intervention VAS score in the sitting position was significantly lower in group B than in group F (5.9 ± 2.1 vs. 3.5 ± 1.5, P = 0.01). Group B also had more significant improvement in SA (27.5° (20.75-36.5°), in comparison to group F (10 (5-18.75), P = 0.006). The positioning quality was better in group B, with 70% of patients achieving an optimal position compared to only 10% in group F ( P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided SFICB, as compared to systemic fentanyl, provided better analgesia and helped to achieve a better and more comfortable position to perform the neuraxial block.

The incidence of subsequent hip arthroscopy after rectus-sparing periacetabular osteotomy.

Aims: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the preferred treatment for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in adolescents and young adults. There remains a lack of consensus regarding whether intra-articular procedures such as labral repair or improvement of femoral offset should be performed at the time of PAO or addressed subsequent to PAO if symptoms warrant. The purpose was to determine the rate of subsequent hip arthroscopy (HA) in a contemporary cohort of patients, who underwent PAO in isolation without any intra-articular procedures. Methods: From June 2012 to March 2022, 349 rectus-sparing PAOs were performed and followed for a minimum of one year (mean 6.2 years (1 to 11)). The mean age was 24 years (14 to 46) and 88.8% were female (n = 310). Patients were evaluated at final follow-up for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Clinical records were reviewed for complications or subsequent surgery. Radiographs were reviewed for the following acetabular parameters: lateral centre-edge angle, anterior centre-edge angle, acetabular index, and the alpha-angle (AA). Patients were cross-referenced from the two largest hospital systems in our area to determine if subsequent HA was performed. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze risk factors for HA. Results: A total of 16 hips (15 patients; 4.6%) underwent subsequent HA with labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty, the most common interventions. For those with a minimum of two years of follow-up, 5.3% (n = 14) underwent subsequent HA. No hips underwent total hip arthroplasty and one revision PAO was performed. Overall, 17 hips (4.9%) experienced a complication and 99 (26.9%) underwent hardware removal. All PROMs improved significantly postoperatively. Radiologically, 80% of hips (n = 279) reached the goal for acetabular correction (77% for acetbular index and 93% for LCEA), with no significant differences between those who underwent subsequent HA and those who did not. Conclusion: Rectus-sparing PAO is associated with a low rate of subsequent HA for intra-articular pathology at a mean of 6.2 years' follow-up (1 to 11). Acetabular correction alone may be sufficient as the primary intervention for the majority of patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia.

Surgical treatment outcomes of acetabular posterior wall and posterior column fractures using 3D printing technology and individualized custom-made metal plates: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Fractures involving the posterior acetabulum with its rich vascular and neural supply present challenges in trauma orthopedics. This study evaluates the effectiveness of 3D printing technology with the use of custom-made metal plates in the treatment of posterior wall and column acetabular fractures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis included 31 patients undergoing surgical fixation for posterior wall and column fractures of the acetabulum (16 in the 3D printing group, utilizing 3D printing for a 1:1 pelvic model and custom-made plates based on preoperative simulation; 15 in the traditional group, using conventional methods). Surgical and instrument operation times, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative blood loss, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing time, preoperative and 12-month postoperative pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), hip joint function at 6 and 12 months (Harris scores), and complications were compared. RESULTS: The surgical and instrument operation times were significantly shorter in the 3D printing group (p < 0.001). The 3D printing group exhibited significantly lower intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency and blood loss (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of fracture reduction quality, fracture healing time, preoperative pain scores (NRS scores), and 6-month hip joint function (Harris scores) (p > 0.05). However, at 12 months, hip joint function and pain scores were significantly better in the 3D printing group (p < 0.05). Although the incidence of complications was lower in the 3D printing group (18.8% vs. 33.3%), the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.433). CONCLUSION: Combining 3D printing with individualized custom-made metal plates for acetabular posterior wall and column fractures reduces surgery and instrument time, minimizes intraoperative procedures and blood loss, enhancing long-term hip joint function recovery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: 12/04/2023;Trial Registration No. ChiCTR2300070438; http://www.chictr.org.cn .

3D-Printed custom-made hemipelvic endoprosthetic reconstruction following periacetabular tumor resection: utilizing a novel classification system.

BACKGROUND: Customized 3D-printed pelvic implants with a porous structure have revolutionized periacetabular pelvic defect reconstruction after tumor resection, offering improved osteointegration, long-term stability, and anatomical fit. However, the lack of an established classification system hampers implementation and progress. METHODS: We formulated a novel classification system based on pelvic defect morphology and 3D-printed hemipelvis endoprostheses. It integrates surgical approach, osteotomy guide plate and prosthesis design, postoperative rehabilitation plans, and perioperative processes. RESULTS: Retrospectively analyzing 60 patients (31 males, 29 females), we classified them into Type A (15 patients: Aa = 6, Ab = 9), Type B (27 patients: Ba = 15, Bb = 12), Type C (17 patients). All underwent customized osteotomy guide plate-assisted tumor resection and 3D-printed hemipelvic endoprosthesis reconstruction. Follow-up duration was median 36.5 ± 15.0 months (range, 6 to 74 months). The mean operating time was 430.0 ± 106.7 min, intraoperative blood loss 2018.3 ± 1305.6 ml, transfusion volume 2510.0 ± 1778.1 ml. Complications occurred in 13 patients (21.7%), including poor wound healing (10.0%), deep prosthesis infection (6.7%), hip dislocation (3.3%), screw fracture (1.7%), and interface loosening (1.7%). VAS score improved from 5.5 ± 1.4 to 1.7 ± 1.3, MSTS-93 score from 14.8 ± 2.5 to 23.0 ± 5.6. Implant osseointegration success rate was 98.5% (128/130), with one Type Ba patient experiencing distal prosthesis loosening. CONCLUSION: The West China classification may supplement the Enneking and Dunham classification, enhancing interdisciplinary communication and surgical outcomes. However, further validation and wider adoption are required to confirm clinical effectiveness.

[Application of modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angles test system in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty after lumbar fusion].

Objective: To investigate the accuracy and effectiveness of acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) after lumbar fusion applying of modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angles test system. Methods: A clinical data of 45 patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis between January 2018 and June 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. All patients had previously received lumbar fusion. The modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angle test system was used in 26 cases (observation group) and not used in 19 cases (control group) during THA. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, operative side, number of lumbar fusion segments, and preoperative Harris score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The position of acetabular prosthesis, hip function (Harris score), and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results: In the observation group, all acetabular cups were in the safe zone (anteversion angle, 25°-30°) during operation, and 1 acetabular cup (3.85%) was not in the safe zone after operation. In the control group, 9 acetabular cups (47.37%) were not in the safe zone. The postoperative difference between the two groups was significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between intra- and post-operative acetabular inclination angles in the observation group ( P>0.05), and the postoperative acetabular inclination angle was significantly smaller in the observation group than in the control group ( P<0.05). All incisions healed by first intention and no infection occurred. All patients were followed up 6 months. There was no significant difference in Harris score between the two groups at different time point ( P>0.05), and there were significant differences between different time points in the two groups ( P<0.05). No joint dislocation occurred in the observation group during follow-up, while dislocation occurred in 2 cases and femoral impingement syndrome occurred in 1 case of the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion: For THA patients with lumbar fusion, the ideal placement angle of the acetabular cup can be obtained by using the modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angles test system during operation.

Comparison of 2 different fixation techniques of comminuted acetabular quadrilateral surface fractures using square bracket-shaped tubular plate or interfragmentary screws in addition to supra/infrapectineal plate fixation: An observational study.

The management of comminuted quadrilateral fractures remains challenging, and treatment options are constantly evolving. The purpose of the present study was to examine the outcomes of 2 different fixation techniques in the management of comminuted quadrilateral fractures. Twenty-two patients with comminuted quadrilateral acetabular fractures were surgically treated with interfragmentary lag screw (group 1) and square bracket-shaped tubular (SBST) plate technique (group 2), in addition to suprapectineal and infrapectineal pelvic reconstruction plate fixation between January 2016 and July 2019 at our clinic. 2 years follow-up control data of each group were compared in terms of radiological and functional results, and complications. According to the functional score comparison, the mean Merle d'Aubigne Postel scoring system (MAP) score was 15.2/15.6 (P = .632), and the mean Harris hip scoring (HHS) system score was 74.65/77.3 (P = .664) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Radiological comparison was performed according to matta radiological criteria (MRC), and 2 excellent, 6 good, 2 poor, 4 excellent, 4 good, and 4 poor radiological results were observed in groups 1 and 2, respectively. intraarticular screw penetration was detected in 3 patients in group 1, while there was no articular implant penetration in group 2 (P = .001). We believe that satisfactory results can be obtained with the SBST plate technique, offering functional and clinical outcomes that are similar to those of the interfragmentary screw technique. The SBST plate technique is superior in terms of avoiding intraarticular screw penetration and related revision surgery.

Low-dose CT: A safe and effective imaging modality in post-operative pelvic & acetabular fixation.

INTRODUCTION: Post-operative pelvic & acetabular fixation patients are conventionally imaged using 3-view radiographs (AP, inlet and outlet). The efficacy of such radiographs is inconsistent due to technical difficulties capturing an adequate view, often necessitating repeat radiographs and therefore increasing radiation exposure. Radiographs can be difficult to interpret, limiting the assessment of fracture reduction and fixation, especially with respect to metalwork positioning around articular surfaces. Traditionally, post-operative pelvic & acetabular fixation patients undergo repeat 3-view radiographs post-operatively, at 6 weeks, followed by at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. We propose a new pathway, in which patients have one low-dose pelvic CT immediately post-operatively, followed by one radiograph (AP pelvis) at the same time points. METHODS: A new pelvic CT protocol was created to provide high quality 3D imaging whilst delivering a 5 times lower radiation dose (compared to normal pelvic CT). Data for all pelvic radiographs and CTs between January 2021 and March 2022 was exported. Using dose area product values, effective radiation dose and attributable lifetime cancer risk were calculated. RESULTS: There were 42 patients included in the analysis (age range 15 to 87).The average effective dose for the 3-view pelvic X-rays was 0.6mSv (range 0.2 to 2.8mSv), and 1.1mSv (range 0.5 to 2.2mSv) for the low-dose pelvic CT. Traditional 7 × 3-view post-operative radiographs: 7 × 0.6mSv = 4.2mSv (corresponding to 1 in 11,000 cancer risk) Low dose post-operative CT and 6 × 1-view radiographs: 1.1mSv + (6 × 0.6mSv / 3) = 2.3mSv (corresponding to 1 in 20,000 cancer risk) CONCLUSION: Low-dose CT scanning (in conjunction with 1-view radiographs) is an effective and safe imaging modality in the post-operative assessment of pelvic & acetabular fracture fixation, conferring a lower radiation burden, easier logistics, and higher quality images when compared to the traditional pathway of 3-view radiographs.

Biomechanical and clinical outcomes of 3D-printed versus modular hemipelvic prostheses for limb-salvage reconstruction following periacetabular tumor resection: a mid-term retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Debates persist over optimal pelvic girdle reconstruction after acetabular tumor resection, with surgeons grappling between modular and 3D-printed hemipelvic endoprostheses. We hypothesize superior outcomes with 3D-printed versions, yet scarce comparative research exists. This study fills the gap, examining biomechanics and clinical results retrospectively. METHODS: From February 2017 to June 2021, we retrospectively assessed 32 patients undergoing en bloc resection for malignant periacetabular tumors at a single institution. PRIMARY OUTCOME: limb function. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: implant precision, hip joint rotation center restoration, prosthesis-bone osteointegration, and complications. Biomechanical characteristics were evaluated through finite element analysis on pelvic defect models. RESULTS: In the 3D-printed group, stress distribution mirrored a normal pelvis, contrasting the modular group with elevated overall stress, unstable transitions, and higher stress peaks. The 3D-printed group exhibited superior functional scores (MSTS: 24.3 ± 1.8 vs. 21.8 ± 2.0, p < 0.05; HHS: 79.8 ± 5.2 vs. 75.3 ± 3.5, p < 0.05). Prosthetic-bone interface osteointegration, measured by T-SMART, favored 3D-printed prostheses, but surgery time (426.2 ± 67.0 vs. 301.7 ± 48.6 min, p < 0.05) and blood loss (2121.1 ± 686.8 vs. 1600.0 ± 505.0 ml, p < 0.05) were higher. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D-printed hemipelvic endoprosthesis offers precise pelvic ring defect matching, superior stress transmission, and function compared to modular endoprostheses. However, complexity, fabrication expertise, and challenging surgical implantation result in prolonged operation times and increased blood loss. A nuanced consideration of functional outcomes, complexity, and patient conditions is crucial for informed treatment decisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study (Retrospective comparative study).

Cup-cage constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity.

Aims: Pelvic discontinuity is a challenging acetabular defect without a consensus on surgical management. Cup-cage reconstruction is an increasingly used treatment strategy. The present study evaluated implant survival, clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications associated with the cup-cage construct. Methods: We included 53 cup-cage construct (51 patients) implants used for hip revision procedures for pelvic discontinuity between January 2003 and January 2022 in this retrospective review. Mean age at surgery was 71.8 years (50.0 to 92.0; SD 10.3), 43/53 (81.1%) were female, and mean follow-up was 6.4 years (0.02 to 20.0; SD 4.6). Patients were implanted with a Trabecular Metal Revision Shell with either a ZCA cage (n = 12) or a TMARS cage (n = 40, all Zimmer Biomet). Pelvic discontinuity was diagnosed on preoperative radiographs and/or intraoperatively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, with failure defined as revision of the cup-cage reconstruction. Results: The five-year all-cause survival for cup-cage reconstruction was 73.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 61.4 to 85.4), while the ten- and 15-year survival was 63.7% (95% CI 46.8 to 80.6). Survival due to aseptic loosening was 93.4% (95% CI 86.2 to 100.0) at five, ten, and 15 years. The rate of revision for aseptic loosening, infection, and dislocation was 3/53 (5.7%), 7/53 (13.2%), and 6/53 (11.3%), respectively. The mean leg length discrepancy improved (p < 0.001) preoperatively from a mean of 18.2 mm (0 to 80; SD 15.8) to 7.0 mm (0 to 35; SD 9.8) at latest follow-up. The horizontal and vertical hip centres improved (p < 0.001) preoperatively from a mean of 9.2 cm (5.6 to 17.5; SD 2.3) to 10.1 cm (6.2 to 13.4; SD 2.1) and 9.3 cm (4.7 to 15.8; SD 2.5) to 8.0 cm (3.7 to 12.3; SD 1.7), respectively. Conclusion: Cup-cage reconstruction provides acceptable outcomes in the management of pelvic discontinuity. One in four constructs undergo revision within five years, most commonly for periprosthetic joint infection, dislocation, or aseptic loosening.

Ganz femoral head reduction associated with coverage and containment procedures improve radiological and functional outcomes in Perthes' disease.

Aims: Ganz's studies made it possible to address joint deformities on both the femoral and acetabular side brought about by Perthes' disease. Femoral head reduction osteotomy (FHRO) was developed to improve joint congruency, along with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), which may enhance coverage and containment. The purpose of this study is to show the clinical and morphological outcomes of the technique and the use of an implemented planning approach. Methods: From September 2015 to December 2021, 13 FHROs were performed on 11 patients for Perthes' disease in two centres. Of these, 11 hips had an associated PAO. A specific CT- and MRI-based protocol for virtual simulation of the corrections was developed. Outcomes were assessed with radiological parameters (sphericity index, extrusion index, integrity of the Shenton's line, lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle), and clinical parameters (range of motion, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and EuroQol five-dimension five-level health questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)). Early and late complications were reported. Results: The mean follow-up was 39.7 months (standard deviation (SD) 26.4). The mean age at surgery was 11.4 years (SD 1.6). No major complications were recorded. One patient required a total hip arthroplasty. Mean femoral head sphericity increased from 46.8% (SD 9.34%) to 70.2% (SD 15.44; p < 0.001); mean LCEA from 19.2° (SD 9.03°) to 44° (SD 10.27°; p < 0.001); mean extrusion index from 37.8 (SD 8.70) to 7.5 (SD 9.28; p < 0.001); and mean Tönnis angle from 16.5° (SD 12.35°) to 4.8° (SD 4.05°; p = 0.100). The mean VAS improved from 3.55 (SD 3.05) to 1.22 (1.72; p = 0.06); mean Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score from 14.55 (SD 1.74) to 16 (SD 1.6; p = 0.01); and mean mHHS from 60.6 (SD 18.06) to 81 (SD 6.63; p = 0.021). The EQ-5D-5L also showed significant improvements. Conclusion: FHRO associated with periacetabular procedures is a safe technique that showed improved functional, clinical, and morphological outcomes in Perthes' disease. The newly introduced simulation and planning algorithm may help to further refine the technique.

Acetabular component liner exchange with highly crosslinked polyethylene for wear and osteolysis.

Aims: Isolated acetabular liner exchange with a highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) component is an option to address polyethylene wear and osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the presence of a well-fixed acetabular shell. The liner can be fixed either with the original locking mechanism or by being cemented within the acetabular component. Whether the method used for fixation of the HXLPE liner has any bearing on the long-term outcomes is still unclear. Methods: Data were retrieved for all patients who underwent isolated acetabular component liner exchange surgery with a HXLPE component in our institute between August 2000 and January 2015. Patients were classified according to the fixation method used (original locking mechanism (n = 36) or cemented (n = 50)). Survival and revision rates were compared. A total of 86 revisions were performed and the mean duration of follow-up was 13 years. Results: A total of 20 patients (23.3%) had complications, with dislocation alone being the most common (8.1%; 7/86). Ten patients (11.6%) required re-revision surgery. Cementing the HXLPE liner (8.0%; 4/50) had a higher incidence of re-revision due to acetabular component liner-related complications than using the original locking mechanism (0%; 0/36; p = 0.082). Fixation using the original locking mechanism was associated with re-revision due to acetabular component loosening (8.3%; 3/36), compared to cementing (0%; 0/50; p = 0.038). Overall estimated mean survival was 19.2 years. There was no significant difference in the re-revision rate between the original locking mechanism (11.1%; 4/36) and cementing (12.0%; 6/50; p = 0.899). Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the revision-free survival of HXLPE fixed with the original locking mechanism and cementing was 94.1% and 93.2%, respectively, at ten years, and 84.7% and 81.3%, respectively, at 20 years (p = 0.840). Conclusion: The re-revision rate and the revision-free survival following acetabular component liner exchange revision surgery using the HXLPE liner were not influenced by the fixation technique used. Both techniques were associated with good survival at a mean follow-up of 13 years. Careful patient selection is necessary for isolated acetabular component liner exchange revision surgery in order to achieve the best outcomes.

Can a reconstruction algorithm in major acetabular bone loss be successful in revision hip arthroplasty?

Aims: The aims of this study were to determine the success of a reconstruction algorithm used in major acetabular bone loss, and to further define the indications for custom-made implants in major acetabular bone loss. Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of Paprosky type III acetabular defects treated according to a reconstruction algorithm. IIIA defects were planned to use a superior augment and hemispherical acetabular component. IIIB defects were planned to receive either a hemispherical acetabular component plus augments, a cup-cage reconstruction, or a custom-made implant. We used national digital health records and registry reports to identify any reoperation or re-revision procedure and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) for patient-reported outcomes. Implant survival was determined via Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: A total of 105 procedures were carried out in 100 patients (five bilateral) with a mean age of 73 years (42 to 94). In the IIIA defects treated, 72.0% (36 of 50) required a porous metal augment; the remaining 14 patients were treated with a hemispherical acetabular component alone. In the IIIB defects, 63.6% (35 of 55) underwent reconstruction as planned with 20 patients who actually required a hemispherical acetabular component alone. At mean follow-up of 7.6 years, survival was 94.3% (95% confidence interval 97.4 to 88.1) for all-cause revision and the overall dislocation rate was 3.8% (4 of 105). There was no difference observed in survival between type IIIA and type IIIB defects and whether a hemispherical implant alone was used for the reconstruction or not. The mean gain in OHS was 16 points. Custom-made implants were only used in six cases, in patients with either a mega-defect in which the anteroposterior diameter > 80 mm, complex pelvic discontinuity, and massive bone loss in a small pelvis. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a reconstruction algorithm can provide a successful approach to reconstruction in major acetabular bone loss. The use of custom implants has been defined in this series and accounts for < 5% of cases.

Virtual biomechanical assessment of porous tantalum and custom triflange components in the treatment of patients with acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity.

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical models of two frequently used techniques for reconstructing severe acetabular defects with pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) - the Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System (TMARS) and custom triflange acetabular components (CTACs) - using virtual modelling. Methods: Pre- and postoperative CT scans from ten patients who underwent revision with the TMARS for a Paprosky IIIB acetabular defect with pelvic discontinuity were retrospectively collated. Computer models of a CTAC implant were designed from the preoperative CT scans of these patients. Computer models of the TMARS reconstruction were segmented from postoperative CT scans using a semi-automated method. The amount of bone removed, the implant-bone apposition that was achieved, and the restoration of the centre of rotation of the hip were compared between all the actual TMARS and the virtual CTAC implants. Results: The median amount of bone removed for TMARS reconstructions was significantly greater than for CTAC implants (9.07 cm3 (interquartile range (IQR) 5.86 to 21.42) vs 1.16 cm3 (IQR 0.42 to 3.53) (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the median overall implant-bone apposition between TMARS reconstructions and CTAC implants (54.8 cm2 (IQR 28.2 to 82.3) vs 56.6 cm2 (IQR 40.6 to 69.7) (p = 0.683). However, there was significantly more implant-bone apposition within the residual acetabulum (45.2 cm2 (IQR 28.2 to 72.4) vs 25.5 cm2 (IQR 12.8 to 44.1) (p = 0.001) and conversely significantly less apposition with the outer cortex of the pelvis for TMARS implants compared with CTAC reconstructions (0 cm2 (IQR 0 to 13.1) vs 23.2 cm2 (IQR 16.4 to 30.6) (p = 0.009). The mean centre of rotation of the hip of TMARS reconstructions differed by a mean of 11.1 mm (3 to 28) compared with CTAC implants. Conclusion: In using TMARS, more bone is removed, thus achieving more implant-bone apposition within the residual acetabular bone. In CTAC implants, the amount of bone removed is minimal, while the implant-bone apposition is more evenly distributed between the residual acetabulum and the outer cortex of the pelvis. The differences suggest that these implants used to treat pelvic discontinuity might achieve short- and long-term stability through different biomechanical mechanisms.

A 30-year follow-up study of rotational acetabular osteotomy for pre- and early-stage osteoarthritis secondary to dysplasia of the hip.

Aims: The objective of this study was to present the outcomes of rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) over a 30-year period for osteoarthritis (OA) secondary to dysplasia of the hip in pre- or early-stage OA. Methods: Between September 1987 and December 1994, we provided treatment to 47 patients (55 hips) with RAO for the management of pre- or early-stage OA due to developmental hip dysplasia. Of those, eight patients (11 hips) with pre-OA (follow-up rate 79%) and 27 patients (32 hips) with early-stage OA (follow-up rate 78%), totalling 35 patients (43 hips) (follow-up rate 78%), were available at a minimum of 28 years after surgery. Results: In the pre-OA group, the mean Merle d'Aubigné score improved significantly from 14.5 points (SD 0.7) preoperatively to 17.4 points at final follow-up (SD 1.2; p = 0.004) and in the early-stage group, the mean score did not improve significantly from 14.0 (SD 0.3) to 14.6 (SD 2.4; p = 0.280). Radiologically, the centre-edge angle, acetabular roof angle, and head lateralization index were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups. Radiological progression of OA was observed in two patients (two hips) in the pre-OA group and 17 patients (18 hips) in the early-stage group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with radiological progression of OA as the primary outcome, projected a 30-year survival rate of 81.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.00) for the pre-OA group and 42.2% (95% CI 0.244 to 0.600) for the early-stage group. In all cases, the overall survival rate stood at 51.5% (95% CI 0.365 to 0.674) over a 30-year period, and when the endpoint was conversion to total hip arthroplasty, the survival rate was 74.0% (95% CI 0.608 to 0.873). Conclusion: For younger patients with pre-OA, joint preservation of over 30 years can be expected after RAO.

Reconstruction of Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments using the footing technique.

Aims: The use of a porous metal shell supported by two augments with the 'footing' technique is one solution to manage Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to assess the medium-term implant survival and radiological and clinical outcomes of this technique. Methods: We undertook a retrospective, two-centre series of 39 hips in 39 patients (15 male, 24 female) treated with the 'footing' technique for Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects between 2007 and 2020. The median age at the time of surgery was 64.4 years (interquartile range (IQR) 54.4 to 71.0). The median follow-up was 3.9 years (IQR 3.1 to 7.0). Results: The cumulative medium-term survival of the acetabular construct was 89%. Two hips (5.1%) required further revision due to shell loosening, one hip (2.6%) due to shell dislocation, and one hip (2.6%) due to infection. The median Harris Hip Score improved significantly from 47 points (IQR 41.5 to 54.9) preoperatively to 80 points (IQR 73.5 to 88.6) at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The reconstruction of Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and two augments using the 'footing' technique showed excellent medium-term results. It is a viable option for treating these challenging defects.

Hip Reconstruction In Situ with Screws and Cement (HiRISC) construct to treat large acetabular bone defects.

Aims: Large bone defects resulting from osteolysis, fractures, osteomyelitis, or metastases pose significant challenges in acetabular reconstruction for total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to evaluate the survival and radiological outcomes of an acetabular reconstruction technique in patients at high risk of reconstruction failure (i.e. periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), poor bone stock, immunosuppressed patients), referred to as Hip Reconstruction In Situ with Screws and Cement (HiRISC). This involves a polyethylene liner embedded in cement-filled bone defects reinforced with screws and/or plates for enhanced fixation. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 59 consecutive acetabular reconstructions was performed by four surgeons in a single institution from 18 October 2018 to 5 January 2023. Cases were classified based on the Paprosky classification, excluding type 1 cases (n = 26) and including types 2 or 3 for analysis (n = 33). Radiological loosening was evaluated by an orthopaedic surgeon who was not the operating surgeon, by comparing the immediate postoperative radiographs with the ones at latest follow-up. Mean follow-up was 557 days (SD 441; 31 to 1,707). Results: Out of the 33 cases analyzed, six (18.2%) constructs required revision, with four revisions due to uncontrolled infection, one for dislocation, and one for aseptic loosening. Among the 27 non-revised constructs, only one showed wider radiolucencies compared to immediate postoperative radiographs, indicating potential loosening. Patients who underwent revision (n = 6) were significantly younger and had a higher BMI compared to those with non-revised constructs (p = 0.016 and p = 0.026, respectively). Sex, race, ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, infection status (patients with postoperative PJI diagnosis (septic) vs patients without such diagnosis (aseptic)), and mean follow-up did not significantly differ between revised and non-revised groups. Conclusion: The HiRISC technique may serve as a feasible short-term (about one to two years) alternative in patients with large acetabular defects, particularly in cases of PJI. Longer follow-up is necessary to establish the long-term survival of this technique.

[Effectiveness analysis of revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty assisted by artificial intelligence preoperative planning system].

Objective: To explore the short-term effectiveness of hip revision surgery guided by artificial intelligence preoperative planning (AIHIP) system. Methods: The clinical data of 22 patients (23 hips) who were admitted between June 2019 and March 2023 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. There were 12 males and 10 females with an average age of 69.7 years (range, 44-90 years). There were 19 hips in the first revision, 3 hips in the second revision, and 1 hip in the third revision. The causes of revision included 12 hips with prosthesis loosening, 4 hips with acetabular cup loosening, 3 hips with osteolysis, 2 hips with acetabular dislocation, 1 hip with postoperative infection, and 1 hip with prosthesis wear. There were 6 hips in stage ⅡA, 9 hips in stage ⅡB, 4 hips in stage ⅡC, 3 hips in stage ⅢA, and 1 hip in stage ⅢB according to Paprosky staging of acetabular bone defect. The replacement of prosthesis type, operation time, hospitalization stay, ground active condition, and postoperative infection, fracture, prosthesis loosening, and other adverse events were recorded. The function of the affected limb was evaluated by Harris score before operation, at 1 week and 6 months after operation, and the range of motion of the hip joint was compared before operation and at 6 months after operation. Results: The operation time was 85-510 minutes, with an average of 241.8 minutes; the hospitalization stay was 7-35 days, with an average of 15.2 days; the time of disassociation from the walker was 2-108 days, with an average of 42.2 days. All the 22 patients were followed up 8-53 months (mean, 21.7 months). No adverse events such as prosthesis loosening or infection occurred in the rest of the patients, except for postoperative hematoma of the thigh in 1 patient and dislocation of the hip in 1 hip. The matching degree of acetabular cup was completely matched in 22 hips and mismatched in 1 hip (+2), the matching rate was 95.65%. The matching degree of femoral stem was completely matched in 22 hips and generally matched in 1 hip (-1), and the matching rate was 100%. The Harris scores were 55.3±9.8 and 89.6±7.2 at 1 week and 6 months after operation, respectively, which significantly improved when compared with before operation (33.0±8.6, P<0.05), and further improved at 6 months after operation than at 1 week after operation ( P<0.05). The function of hip joint was evaluated by Harris score at 6 months after operation, and 21 hips were good and 2 hips were moderate, which could meet the needs of daily life. The range of motion of hip joint was (111.09±10.11)° at 6 months after operation, which was significantly different from (79.13±18.50)° before operation ( t=-7.269, P<0.001). Conclusion: AIHIP system can improve the accuracy of revision surgery, reduce the difficulty of surgery, and achieve good postoperative recovery and satisfactory short-term effectiveness.