Comparison of long-term progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus prior to natural service or fixed-time artificial insemination in Bos indicus-influenced beef heifers.

This experiment was designed to evaluate breeding strategies involving natural service or fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) in Bos indicus-influenced beef heifers (n = 1456) when there were field-type management conditions. Body weights and reproductive tract scores (RTS; Scale 1-5) were obtained for heifers before assignment to one of five treatments: 1) Non-synchronized control exposed for natural service (NS), n = 299; 2) melengestrol acetate + natural service (MGA + NS; 0.5 mg/heifer/d), n = 295; 3) 14-d controlled internal drug release insert + natural service (CIDR + NS), n = 289; 4) 14-d MGA-prostaglandin F2α (PG) + FTAI, n = 295; or 5) 14-d CIDR-PG + FTAI, n = 278. Fertile bulls were placed in pastures with heifers of the three NS treatment groups for a 65-day period which began 10 days after progestin treatments (MGA or CIDR) ended. Heifers in FTAI treatment groups were administered PG (25 mg, IM) 16 days after CIDR removal or 19 days following MGA withdrawal, respectively, and FTAI was performed at 66 (CIDR-PG) or 72 h (MGA-PG) after PG. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH; 100 µg, i.m.) was administered at FTAI. Pregnancy status was determined at the end of a 65-day breeding period. Pregnancy rates on Days 21 and 65 of the breeding period differed among treatment groups based on pre-treatment pubertal status (P ≤ 0.02) and body weight (P ≤ 0.05) but did not differ by group. These data highlight the need for continued research efforts to improve reproductive management of Bos indicus-influenced females.

Comparison of two alternate PGF2α products in two estrus synchronization protocols in beef heifers.

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of a high concentrate, s.c. PGF2α compared with a conventionally concentrated, i.m. PGF2α in estrus synchronization protocols for heifers. In Exp. 1, 869 Angus-based beef heifers were enrolled at 8 locations. All heifers were exposed to the 7-d CO-Synch + controlled internal drug release (CIDR) estrus synchronization protocol. On day 7 of the protocol heifers received 100 µg of GnRH i.m., and a CIDR insert for 7 d. On day 0, at CIDR removal, estrous detection patches were applied to heifers and, within location, heifers randomly received 1 of 2 PGF2α treatments: 5 mL of Lutalyse i.m. (CONTROL; n = 434) or a 2 mL of Lutalyse HighCon s.c. (HiCON; n = 435). A second GnRH injection was administered at 54 ± 2 h and heifers were fixed-time AI (TAI). Heifers were evaluated for estrous activity at TAI by determining the activation of estrous detection patches. Pregnancy rates to AI (PR/AI) were diagnosed by transrectal ultrasonography between 35 and 55 d after TAI. The percentage of heifers exhibiting estrus between day 0 and TAI did not differ (P = 0.68) between CONTROL and HiCON treatments (47 vs. 46 ± 4%, respectively). Additionally, PR/AI were similar (P = 0.65) between CONTROL and HiCON treatments (46 vs. 45 ± 3%). In Exp. 2, 190 Angus-based beef heifers were enrolled at 2 locations. Heifers were exposed to the melengestrol acetate (MGA)-PGF2α protocol where they were offered 0.5 mg MGA per day from days 1 to 14. On day 33, heifers were randomly assigned to receive CONTROL (n = 95) or HiCON (n = 95) treatment, and estrous detection aids were applied. Heifers were exposed to AI 12 h after detection of estrus. Heifers not detected in estrus at location 1 received a second PGF2α injection 6 d after the initial PGF2α injection and were placed with fertile bulls. Heifers at location 2 that did not express estrus were administered 100 µg of GnRH i.m. and exposed to TAI 96 h after the initial PGF2α injection. Transrectal ultrasonography was used to diagnose PR/AI between 51 and 57 d after the initial PGF2α injection. The percentage of heifers exhibiting estrus during the estrus detection period was similar (P = 0.40) between CONTROL and HiCON treatments (82 vs. 87 ± 4%). Furthermore, PR/AI were similar (P = 0.62) between CONTROL and HiCON treatments (60 vs. 65 ± 5%). In summary, the 2 concentrations and corresponding routes of administration of PGF2α were similar in efficacy at synchronizing estrus in beef heifers.

Timed insemination of beef heifers using the 7-11 Synch protocol.

Two experiments were conducted over 3 yr to determine pregnancy rates in beef heifers after a timed AI in response to the 7-11 Synch protocol. In Exp. 1, 179 heifers were either fed melengestrol acetate (MGA; 7-11 Synch) or given an intravaginal progesterone (P4)-releasing insert [controlled intravaginal drug releasing device (CIDR); 7-11 CIDR] for 7 d. Prostaglandin F2αwas administered on the last day of MGA feeding or at CIDR removal followed by the CO-Synch protocol (GnRH-PGF2α-GnRH) beginning 4 d after MGA withdrawal or 2 d after CIDR removal. Heifers received a timed AI with GnRH beginning 48 h after the second PGF2α. Blood samples were collected at d -10, 0 (start of MGA feeding), and 18 (second PGF2α injection). In Exp. 2, 298 beef heifers were treated with the 7-11 Synch protocol with (7-11 Synch) or without (7 Synch) the first GnRH injection. Fixed time AI and GnRH was given 54 h after PGF2α. Blood samples were collected at d -10 and 0 in yr 1 and d -10, 0, 18 and at AI in yr 2. In Exp. 1, no differences were detected between 7 and 11 Synch and 7-11 CIDR for attainment of puberty in noncyclic heifers (94 vs. 78%; P = 0.21), the proportion of heifers that had luteal tissue on d 18 (87 vs. 83%; P = 0.41), or pregnancy rates after timed AI (47 vs. 46%; P = 0.99). In Exp. 2, administration of GnRH 4 d after the last MGA (7-11 Synch) feeding tended (P = 0.07) to induce more prepubertal heifers to cycle (88 vs. 61%) and increased (P < 0.01) the proportion of heifers with luteal tissue on d 18 (88 vs. 72%) compared with heifers in the 7 Synch treatment. Pregnancy rates after the 54 h timed AI were greater (P < 0.01) in the 7-11 Synch treatment (55%) than in the 7 Synch (38%). We conclude that heifer pregnancy rates did not differ whether feeding MGA for 7 d or applying a CIDR insert for 7 d before a CO-Synch protocol. In contrast, use of GnRH at the beginning of the CO-Synch protocol improved pregnancy rates after a timed AI by inducing more prepubertal heifers to ovulate and increasing the proportion of heifers with luteal tissue at the PGF2α injection.

Comparison of long-term progestin-based estrus synchronization protocols in beef heifers.

Two experiments evaluated long-term progestin-based estrus-synchronization programs on the basis of potential for use in facilitating fixed-time AI in estrous cycling and prepubertal beef heifers. In Exp. 1, heifers were assigned to 1 of 2 treatments by age, BW, and estrous cyclicity status. Heifers assigned to the melengestrol acetate-PGF(2α) protocol (MGA-PG; n = 50) received MGA (0.5 mg·animal(-1)·d(-1)) in a 1.0-kg carrier from d 0 to 13 and were administered PGF(2α) (25 mg, intramuscularly) 19 d after MGA withdrawal (d 32). Heifers assigned to the Show-Me-Synch protocol (n = 49) received a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert (1.38 g of progesterone) from d 2 to 16 followed by PGF(2α) administration 16 d after CIDR removal (d 32). All heifers were fitted with HeatWatch estrus-detection transmitters at the time of progestin removal for continuous estrus detection through the synchronized period after PGF(2α). In Exp. 2, heifers (n = 396) were assigned to the same 2 treatments described in Exp. 1 by age, BW, and reproductive tract score. Heifers in Exp. 2, however, were fitted with HeatWatch estrus-detection transmitters at PGF(2α) to characterize estrus-distribution patterns during the synchronized period after PGF(2α). Heifers in both experiments were inseminated approximately 12 h after the onset of estrus. In Exp. 1, estrous response after PGF(2α) and mean interval to estrus after PGF(2α) did not differ between MGA-PG and Show-Me-Synch treatments (P = 0.97). The variance for interval to estrus after PGF(2α) tended (P = 0.06) to be reduced among MGA-PG-treated heifers compared with Show-Me-Synch-treated heifers. Conception to AI, AI pregnancy, and final pregnancy rates did not differ (P > 0.1) between treatments. In Exp. 2, estrous response after PGF(2α) was greater (P = 0.01) among Show-Me-Synch-treated heifers (92%) compared with MGA-PG-treated heifers (85%); however, mean interval to estrus after PGF(2α) did not differ (P = 0.74) between MGA-PG (57.4 ± 2.5 h) and Show-Me-Synch (56.2 ± 2.5 h) treatments. The variance for interval to estrus after PGF(2α) was reduced (P < 0.01) among Show-Me-Synch-treated vs. MGA-PG-treated heifers. Conception to AI, AI pregnancy, and final pregnancy rates did not differ (P > 0.1) between treatments. In summary, the Show-Me-Synch protocol compared favorably with the MGA-PG protocol on the basis of estrous response, synchrony of estrus, and resulting fertility after treatment administration.

Development of estrous synchronization protocols using melengestrol acetate in Bos indicus cattle.

Five experiments were conducted on commercial farms in Brazil designed to develop the basis for an estrus synchronization protocol using melengestrol acetate (MGA) in Bos indicus cattle. These studies resulted in the development of the following protocol: 0.5 mg x d(-1) of MGA between d -14 and -1; 2.0 mg i.m. injection of estradiol cypionate on d -9; 48 h temporary weaning between d 0 and 2; and natural service beginning on d 0. The basis of this protocol was to induce estrous cyclicity before postpartum loss of body condition, prevent premature luteolysis, eliminate the need for labor required to detect estrus, and consequently increase the likelihood of pregnancy early during the postpartum period. This treatment effectively induced estrous cyclicity among anestrous cows, synchronized estrus activity, and prevented premature luteolysis with no negative effect on pregnancy.

GnRH treatment at artificial insemination in beef cattle fails to increase plasma progesterone concentrations or pregnancy rates.

Treatment with GnRH at the onset of standing estrus increased pregnancy percentages and circulating concentrations of progesterone in repeat breeder dairy cows. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of treatment with GnRH at AI on concentrations of progesterone and conception rates in beef cattle that exhibited estrus. Two hundred ninety-three heifers at four locations were synchronized with the Select Synch plus CIDR protocol (given GnRH and a CIDR was placed into the vagina, and 7 d later, given PGF(2alpha) and CIDR removed; n=253) or the 14-19 melengestrol acetate (MGA) protocol (MGA fed at 0.5mg/head/d for 14 d, with PGF(2alpha) 19 d after MGA withdrawal n=40) and AI was done after detection of estrus. At Location 1, blood samples were collected on Day 2, 4, 6, 10, 15, and 18 after AI (Day 0=AI). Two hundred and fifty postpartum cows at two locations were synchronized with the Select Synch plus CIDR protocol, and AI was performed after detection of estrus. At AI, cattle were alternately assigned to one of two treatments: (1) treatment with GnRH (100microg) at AI (n=127 heifers and n=108 cows); or (2) non-treated control (n=120 heifers and n=119 cows). Concentrations of progesterone tended to be greater in control heifers compared to GnRH-treated heifers on Days 6 (P=0.08), 10 (P=0.07), and 15 (P=0.11). Overall conception rates were 68% and 66% for GnRH treated and control, respectively, and were not different between treatments (P=0.72). In summary, treatment with GnRH at time of AI had no influence on conception rates in cattle that had exhibited estrus.

Comparison of progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation before fixed-time artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows.

This experiment was designed to compare pregnancy rates in postpartum beef cows resulting from fixed-time AI (FTAI) after treatment with 1 of 2 protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation. Cross-bred, suckled beef cows (n = 650) at 4 locations (n = 210; n = 158; n = 88; and n = 194) were assigned within a location to 1 of 2 protocols within age group by days postpartum and BCS. Cows assigned to the melengestrol acetate (MGA) Select treatment (MGA Select; n = 327) were fed MGA (0.5 mg x head(-1) x d(-1)) for 14 d, GnRH (100 microg of Cystorelin i.m.) was injected on d 26, and prostaglandin F2alpha (PG; 25 mg of Lutalyse i.m.) was injected on d 33. Cows assigned to the CO-Synch + controlled internal drug release (CIDR) protocol (CO-Synch + CIDR; n = 323) were fed a carrier for 14 d, were injected with GnRH and equipped with an EAZI-BREED CIDR insert (1.38 g of progesterone, Pfizer Animal Health, New York, NY) 12 d after carrier removal, and PG (25 mg of Lutalyse i.m.) was injected and the CIDR were removed on d 33. Fixed-time AI was performed at 72 or 66 h after PG for the MGA Select or CO-Synch + CIDR groups, respectively. All cows were injected with GnRH (100 microg of Cystorelin i.m.) at the time of insemination. Blood samples were collected 8 and 1 d before the beginning of MGA or carrier to determine estrous cyclicity status of the cows (estrous cycling vs. anestrus) before treatment [progesterone > or = 0.5 ng/mL (MGA Select, 185/327, 57%; CO-Synch + CIDR, 177/323, 55%); P = 0.65]. There was no difference (P = 0.20) in pregnancy rate to FTAI between treatments (MGA Select, 201/327, 61%; CO-Synch + CIDR, 214/323, 66%). There was also no difference (P = 0.25) between treatments in final pregnancy rate at the end of the breeding period (MGA Select, 305/327, 93%; CO-Synch + CIDR, 308/323, 95%). These data indicate that pregnancy rates to FTAI were comparable after administration of the MGA Select or CO-Synch + CIDR protocols. Both protocols provide opportunities for beef producers to utilize AI and potentially eliminate the need to detect estrus.

Effect of melengestrol acetate as an alternative to induce molting in hens on the expression of yolk proteins and turnover of oviductal epithelium.

Inducing hens to molt increases egg quality, egg production and extends the productive life of hens. It has been previously demonstrated that melengestrol acetate (MGA), an orally active progestin, decreased gonadotropic support for the ovary, which decreased the steroidogenic support for the oviduct and resulted in the cessation of lay. Estradiol produced by the theca cells of small follicles stimulates the production of the yolk proteins vitellogenin II and apolipoprotein II by the liver and supports the oviductal epithelial cells. The objective of the present experiment was to determine gene expression for yolk proteins and oviductal epithelial cell turn-over in response to a MGA-induced molt. Hy-Line W-36 laying hens were fed either 0 or 8mg MGA per day for 28 days in a balanced diet and then returned to a standard layer ration until day 36. Four birds per treatment on days 1, 8, 16, 28 and 36 were euthanized and the liver was removed and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen until RNA was extracted. Expression of vitellogenin II and apolipoprotein II genes was determined using real-time RT-PCR. A portion of the magnum was removed to determine proliferation and programmed cell death for secretory and ciliated luminal epithelium. Vitellogenin II and apolipoprotein II gene expression was reduced in hens fed 8mg MGA compared to those fed 0mg MGA. There was no effect of day on gene expression of either yolk protein. Cell proliferation was increased in the ciliated epithelial cells of the oviduct in hens receiving 8mg MGA compared to those receiving 0mg. However, programmed cell death of the ciliated epithelial cells was not different between controls and MGA treatment. Programmed cell death and proliferation increased in the secretory epithelial cells in hens receiving 8mg MGA compared to controls. Therefore, utilizing MGA as an alternative method to induce molt results in some, but not all, of the physiological changes previously described for hens molted by feed withdrawal. These findings lead us to suggest that some of the observed physiological changes resulting from feed withdrawal are required to increase egg quality and egg production following molt and other changes are not necessary, but are just a result of nutrient deprivation.

Efficacy of either a single or split treatment of PGF2alpha after a 14 day melengestrol acetate treatment to synchronize estrus and induce luteolysis in Bos indicus x Bos taurus heifers.

Two experiments evaluated a modified delivery of prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) after a melengestrol acetate (MGA) treatment in Angus and Bos indicus x Bos taurus (BI) heifers. Experiment 1 was replicated three times with yearling BI heifers (n = 695). Heifers received MGA (0.5 mg head(-1) day(-1)) for 14 days. In Replications 1 and 2, heifers received either 25 mg of PGF2alpha im 19 days after MGA (single) or 12.5 mg of PGF2alpha im 19 and 20 days after MGA (split). In Replication 3, heifers received the same treatments, with PGF2alpha initiated either 18 or 19 days after MGA. Estrus was detected for 72 h after PGF2alpha, with AI commencing 8-12 h after a detected estrus. Heifers not observed in estrus by 72 h were timed-AI concomitant with GnRH (100 microg im). Heifers from Replication 2 (n = 146) had blood samples collected at the initial PGF2alpha and at timed-AI to determine corpus luteum (CL) regression by evaluating plasma progesterone concentrations. The interval from MGA withdrawal to PGF2alpha did not have a significant effect on any variable in Replication 3 and there were no treatment by replication effects for any variables, therefore data were pooled. Modifying the PGF2alpha treatment from a single treatment to two treatments on consecutive days increased (P < 0.05) 72 h estrous response (43.2% versus 50.1%), timed-AI (23.9% versus 33.5%) and total-AI pregnancy rates (34.5% versus 42.5%), and CL regression (79.1% versus 92.5%), respectively. In Experiment 2, yearling Angus (n = 66) and 2-year-old BI (n = 68) heifers were synchronized as per Experiment 1 (with the initial PGF2alpha 19 days after MGA). Neither breed nor PGF2alpha treatment effected (P > 0.05) 72 h estrous response, total-AI pregnancy rate, or CL regression rate. In conclusion, treating yearling BI heifers with split treatments of PGF2alpha (given on two consecutive days) improved estrous response and pregnancy rates by increasing PGF2alpha-induced luteolysis.

A comparison of progestin-based protocols to synchronize ovulation and facilitate fixed-time artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows.

The experimental objective was to compare pregnancy rates after fixed-time AI in postpartum suckled beef cows following administration of two progestin-based protocols to synchronize ovulation. Cows (n = 424) at three locations (n = 208, 122, and 92 per location) were stratified by age, BCS, and days postpartum (DPP) and assigned randomly to one of the two treatment protocols. The MGA Select-treated cows (MGA Select; n = 213) were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA, 0.5 mg x cow(-1) x d(-1)) for 14 d and carrier for 8 d, and then GnRH (100 microg i.m. Cystorelin; d 26) was injected 12 d after MGA withdrawal, and PG (25 mg i.m. Lutalyse) was administered 7 d after GnRH. Cows assigned to the 7-11 Synch protocol (7-11 Synch; n = 209) were fed carrier for 15 d and MGA for 7 d, and then injected with PG on d 22 (d 7 of MGA), GnRH on d 26, and PG again on d 33. Artificial insemination was performed at fixed times for cows in both treatments at 60 or 72 h after d 33 PG for 7-11 Synch and MGA Select groups, respectively. All cows were injected with GnRH (100 microg of i.m. Cystorelin) at AI. There was no treatment x location interaction for age (P = 0.90), BCS (P = 0.64), or DPP (P = 0.93), and the results were therefore pooled for the respective treatments (age [7-11 Synch, 5.5 +/- 0.2; MGA Select, 5.5 +/- 0.2], BCS [7-11 Synch, 5.7 +/- 0.1; MGA Select, 5.6 +/- 0.1], and DPP [7-11 Synch, 41.1 +/- 1.1; MGA Select, 42.1 +/- 1.1]). Blood samples were collected 8 and 1 d before MGA or carrier to determine pretreatment estrous cyclicity (progesterone >or=1 ng/mL; 7-11 Synch, 59/209 [28%]; MGA Select, 54/213 [25%]; P = 0.50) and again on d 33 PG to evaluate treatment response as a percentage of cows with progesterone concentrations in serum >or=1ng/mL (7-11 Synch, 184/209 [88%]; MGA Select, 177/213 [83%]; P = 0.15). Pregnancy rates resulting from fixed-time AI did not differ (P = 0.25) between treatments (7-11 Synch, 128/209 [61%]; MGA Select, 142/213 [67%]), nor did pregnancy rates (P = 0.77) at the end of the breeding season (7-11 Synch, 198/208 [95%]; MGA Select, 204/213 [96%]). These data indicate that pregnancy rates were comparable after fixed-time AI, following administration of the 7-11 Synch and MGA Select protocols. Both protocols provide opportunities for beef producers to use AI and eliminate the need to detect estrus.

Uso do hCG, GnRH ou 17beta-Estradiol e progesterona associados ao acetato de melengestrol e prostaglandina f2alfa em novilhas cruzadas (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus) / Use of hCG, GnRH or 17beta-estradiol and progesterone associated with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2alfa in cross-bred heifers (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus)

O objetivo do presente experimento foi avaliar a performance reprodutiva e as características de estros em novilhas cruzadas de corte (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus) tratadas com o protocolo MGA/Prostaglandina (PG) em associação a outros hormônios. No dia 0 (Dia 0 = início da ingestão do MGA) as novilhas foram distribuídas ao acaso para receber 2mL de solução salina (grupo Salina), 2500UI de hCG (grupo hCG), 20müg de acetato de buserelina (grupo GnRH) ou 5mg de 17beta-estradiol + 100mg de progesterona (grupo 17beta-E2 +P4. Amostras de sangue foram colhidas nos dias - 7, 0, 7 e 10 para a mensuração das concentrações plasmáticas de progesterona. Independentemente do tratamento, todas as novilhas receberam 0,5mg MGA/ animal/ dia durante 8 dias (Dia 0 ao 7) e PG (Dia 7). Os estros foram observados durante 120h, a partir da injeção de PG, pelo sistema Heat- Watch. As novilhas foram inseminadas 12 horas após o início dos estros ou 72h depois da injeção de PG. O diagnóstico de gestação foi realizado 35 dias após a última inseminação, por ultrasonografia. As respostas em estros foram de 50,0%, 22,2%, 59,5% e 71,8% para os grupos Salina, hCG, GnRH e 17beta-E2 +P4, respectivamente (P< ou =0,01). O intervalo médio da injeção de PG ao estro foi de 72,8 + ou - 22,2, 102,0 + ou - 22,7,84,6 + ou - 19,0 e 72,5 + ou - 24,4 horas (P< ou =0,01), sendo o grau de sincronização similar entre os grupos. As taxas de concepção foram de 57,9%, 37,5%, 40,9% e 39,3% e as taxas de prenhez de 29,0%, 11,1 %,27,0% e 28,2%, para os grupos Salina, hCG, GnRH e 17beta-E2 +P4, respectivamente. Não houve efeito do tratamento na duração dos estros (10,4 + ou - 5,7 horas), número de montas (23,0 + ou - 16,9) e duração das montas (2,7 + ou - 0,3 segundos), sendo os valores entre parênteses correspondentes às médias gerais e desvios padrão. Em conclusão, a performance reprodutiva não foi alterada pela adição do hCG, GnRH ou 17beta-E2 +P4 ao protocolo de sincronização MGA/PG.

A comparison of progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus in postpartum beef cows.

Two progestin-based protocols for estrus synchronization in postpartum beef cows were compared following treatment administration on the basis of estrous response, interval to and synchrony of estrus, and pregnancy. Cows were assigned to one of the two treatment protocols by age, body condition score (BCS), and days postpartum (DPP). The MGA Select-treated cows (MGA Select; n = 109) were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA; 0.5mg x cow-1 x d(-1)) for 14 d, fed carrier for 8 d, GnRH (100 microg of Cystorelin) was injected i.m. 12 d after MGA withdrawal, and PG (25 mg of Lutalyse) was administered i.m. 7 d after GnRH. Cows assigned to the 7-11 Synch protocol (7-11 Synch; n = 111) were fed carrier for 15 d, fed MGA for 7 d, injected with PG on d 22 (d 7 of MGA), injected with GnRH on d 26, and injected with PG on d 33. Mean BCS (4.8 +/- 0.1, MGA Select; 4.7 +/- 0.1, 7-11 Synch) and DPP (40 +/- 1, MGA Select; 40 +/- 1, 7-11 Synch) did not differ between treatments. Blood samples were collected 8 d and 1 d before feeding of MGA or carrier to determine the pretreatment estrous cyclicity (progesterone > or = 1 ng/mL; 10/109 [9%], MGA Select; 12/111 [11%], 7-11 Synch), and again at PG on d 33 to evaluate treatment response (81/109 [74%], MGA Select; 84/111 (76%), 7-11 Synch). Serum concentrations of progesterone at PG on d 33 differed (P < 0.01) between treatments (3.3 +/- 0.3 ng/mL [MGA Select] vs. 1.7 +/- 0.1 ng/mL [7-11 Synch]). HeatWatch was used for 6 d after PG on d 33 to detect estrus, and AI was performed 12 h after the onset of estrus. Estrous response did not differ between treatments (100/109 [92%], MGA Select; 101/111 [91%], 7-11 Synch). Mean interval to estrus (65 +/- 2.7 h, MGA Select; 52 +/- 1.8 h, 7-11 Synch) and synchrony of estrus differed (P < 0.01) between treatments. Synchronized conception and pregnancy rates (61/100 [61%], 61/109 [56%], MGA Select; 71/101 [70%], 71/111 [64%], 7-11 Synch), and final pregnancy rates (94/109 [86%], MGA Select; 99/110 [90%], 7-11 Synch) did not differ between treatments. In summary, estrous response and fertility did not differ among cows assigned to the MGA Select or 7-11 Synch protocols. Synchrony of estrus, defined as the variance in the interval to estrus from PG, however, was improved following treatment with the 7-11 Synch protocol.

Follicular dynamics and steroid profiles in cows during and after treatment with progestin-based protocols for synchronization of estrus.

Two progestin-based protocols for the synchronization of estrus in beef cows were compared. Cyclic, nonlactating, crossbred, beef cows were assigned by age and body condition score to one of two treatments. Cows assigned to the MGA Select protocol were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA; 0.5 mg x cow(-1) x (-1)) for 14 d, GnRH was administered (100 microg i.m. of Cystorelin) 12 d after MGA withdrawal, and PGF2alpha (25 mg of i.m. Lutalyse) was administered 7 d after GnRH. Cows assigned to the 7-11 Synch protocol were fed MGA for 7 d and were injected with PG on d 7 of MGA, GnRH on d 11, and PG on d 18. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed daily to monitor follicular dynamics from the beginning of MGA feeding through ovulation after the synchronized estrus. All cows exhibited estrus in response to PG. Mean interval to estrus was shorter (P < 0.01) for 7-11 Synch-treated cows (56 +/- 1.5 h) than for cows assigned to the MGA Select protocol (73 +/- 4.7 h). Mean interval from estrus to ovulation did not differ between treatments (P > 0.10). Variances for interval to estrus differed (P < 0.01) between treatments. Mean follicular diameter at GnRH injection, PG injection, and estrus did not differ (P > 0.10) between treatments. Relative to MGA Select, serum estradiol-17beta concentrations were higher (P < 0.01) for 7-11 Synch 2 d and 1 d before, on the day of GnRH injection, in addition to 4 d after GnRH, and 24 h after PG. Mean progesterone concentrations were greater (P < 0.01) for MGA Select cows from 4 d before to 7 d after GnRH. Forty-four percent of the variation in interval to estrus between treatments was explained by differences in estradiol-17beta concentrations 24 h after PG. This study suggests that follicular competence is likely related to steroidogenic capacity of the follicle and the endocrine environment under which growth and subsequent ovulation of the dominant follicle occurs.

Ability of intravaginal progesterone inserts and melengestrol acetate to induce estrous cycles in postpartum beef cows.

Postpartum anestrous interval in beef cows is a major factor contributing to reproductive failure during a defined breeding season. Our objectives were to determine the ability of a controlled internal drug-releasing device (CIDR, 1.9 g of progesterone), a normal dose of melengestrol acetate (MGA, 0.5 mg x cow(-1) x d(-1)), or a high dose of MGA (4.0 mg x cow(-1) x d(-1)) to induce ovulation and to eliminate short estrous cycles. Multiparous beef cows (n = 100) were equally assigned to one of four treatments: CIDR, normal MGA, high MGA, or control by age, days postpartum, body condition, and body weight. All cows were fed carrier (0.9072 kg x cow(-1) x d(-1)) with (normal MGA, 0.55 mg/kg; high MGA, 4.41 mg/kg) or without MGA for 7 d (d -6 to 0). On d -6, CIDR were inserted and then removed on d 0. Estrous behavior was monitored continuously from d -6 until 29 using HeatWatch electronic mount detectors. Blood was collected on d -13, and three times weekly from d -6 to 29. Treatment influenced (P = 0.03) the percentage of cows that were detected in standing estrus. Beginning on d 2, more CIDR-treated cows had exhibited standing estrus compared with high MGA-treated or control cows, but CIDR- and normal MGA-treated cows did not differ. The percentage of CIDR-treated cows that had ovulated was greater (P < 0.05) than the percentage of normal MGA-treated, high MGA-treated, or control cows beginning on d 4. The percentage of cows that exhibited standing estrus before the first postpartum ovulation (CIDR = 65%, normal MGA = 57%, high MGA = 35%, control = 30%) did not differ (P = 0.09) among treatments. Luteal life span following the first ovulation postpartum and the percentage of cows with a normal luteal life span (i.e., progesterone > 1 ng/mL for > or = 10 d) was greater (P < 0.01) in CIDR-treated cows (14.0 +/- 0.8 d; 20/20, 100%) compared with normal MGA-treated (6.2 +/- 1.0 d; 3/13, 23%), high MGA-treated (9.6 +/- 1.0 d; 8/14, 57%), or control cows (6.1 +/- 0.9 d; 4/17, 24%), and greater (P < 0.03) in high MGA-treated cows than in normal MGA-treated or control cows. In the present study, treatment of early postpartum suckled beef cows with CIDR induced ovulation and initiated estrous cycles with a normal luteal life span in more cows than did treatment with MGA. Treatment with MGA (normal or high dose) did not induce ovulation earlier than in control cows, but a high dose of MGA increased the percentage of cows with normal luteal life spans following the first ovulation postpartum.

Fixed-time artificial insemination of postpartum beef cows at 72 or 80 h after treatment with the MGA Select protocol.

The objective was to determine the appropriate timing of fixed-time artificial insemination (AI) following administration of the MGA Select protocol. Cows at two locations (Location 1, n=114; Location 2, n=97 ) were assigned to fixed-time AI at 72 or 80 h by age, body condition score (BCS), days postpartum (DPP), AI technician, and sire. All cows were synchronized with the MGA Select protocol, consisting of oral administration of melengestrol acetate (MGA; 0.5mg/hd per day) for 14 days, GnRH (Cysotrelin, 100 microg, i.m.; Day 26) 12 days after MGA withdrawal, followed in 7 days with PGF(2alpha) (PG; Lutalyse, 25mg i.m.; Day 33). Cows were inseminated at 72 h ( n=108 ) or 80 h ( n=103 ) after PG and GnRH (100 microg) was given at insemination. Location was not significant and, therefore, was removed from the model. Mean BCS ( 5.2+/-0.1, 72 h; 5.3+/-0.1, 80 h) and DPP ( 34+/-2, 72 h; 35+/-2, 80 h) did not differ ( P>0.1 ) between treatments. Serum progesterone concentrations 7 and 1 day prior to MGA were used to determine pre-treatment cyclicity: cows with at least one sample with progesterone > or =1 ng/ml were defined as cyclic (33/108, 31%, 72 h, versus 32/103, 31%, 80 h; P>0.1). Cows with serum progesterone concentrations > or =1 ng/ml on the day of PG were defined as responding to the synchronization protocol (74/108 (69%), 72 h versus 69/103 (67%), 80 h; P>0.1 ). Although pregnancy rates were higher ( P<0.05 ) for cows inseminated at 72 h (69/108, 64%) versus 80 h (52/103, 50%) after PG, pregnancy rates at the end of the breeding season did not differ ( P>0.1 ) between treatments (98/108 (91%), 72 h; 88/103 (85%), 80 h). In conclusion, pregnancy rates were higher when postpartum beef cows synchronized with the MGA Select protocol were inseminated at 72 h versus 80 h after PG.

Supplemental norgestomet, progesterone, or melengestrol acetate increases pregnancy rates in suckled beef cows after timed inseminations.

In Exp. 1, 187 lactating beef cows were treated with injections of GnRH 7 d before and 48 h after prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha; Cosynch) or with Cosynch plus a 7-d treatment with an intravaginal progesterone (P4)-releasing insert (CIDR-B; Cosynch + CIDR). In Exp. 2, 183 lactating beef cows were treated with the Cosynch protocol or with Cosynch plus a 7-d treatment with norgestomet (Cosynch + NORG). In Exp. 1 and 2, blood samples for later P4 analyses were collected on d -17, -7 (first GnRH injection), 0 (PGF2alpha injection), and at timed artificial insemination (TAI; 48 h after PGF2alpha). In Exp. 3, 609 lactating beef cows were treated with the Cosynch + CIDR protocol or were fed 0.5 mg of melengestrol acetate (MGA) per day for 14 d before initiating the Cosynch protocol 12 d after the 14th d of MGA feeding (MGA + Cosynch). Blood samples were collected as in Exp. 1 and 2, plus additional samples on d -33 and -19 before PGF2alpha. In Exp. 4, 360 lactating beef cows were treated with a Cosynch + CIDR protocol, with TAI occurring at either 48 or 60 h after PGF2alpha, while receiving either GnRH or saline to form four treatments. Blood samples were collected as in Exp. 1 and 2. In Exp. 1, addition of P4 reduced the ability of the first GnRH injection to induce ovulation in anestrous cows with low P4 before PGF2alpha but improved (P = 0.06) pregnancy rates (61 vs 66%). In Exp. 2, the addition of NORG mimicked P4 by likewise increasing (P < 0.01) pregnancy rates (31 vs 51%) beyond those after Cosynch. In Exp. 3, the Cosynch + CIDR protocol increased (P < 0.001) pregnancy rates from 46 to 55% compared to the MGA + Cosynch protocol. In Exp. 4, administration of GnRH at TAI improved (P < 0.05) pregnancy outcomes (50 vs 42%), whereas timing of TAI had limited effects. We conclude that a progestin treatment concurrent with the Cosynch protocol improved pregnancy outcomes in all experiments, but pretreatment of cows with MGA was not as effective as the CIDR insert or NORG implants in this Cosynch-TAI model. Most of the improvement in pregnancy rates was associated with the increase in pregnancy rates of anestrous cows, regardless of whether ovulation was successfully induced in response to GnRH 7 d before PGF2alpha. Injection of GnRH at TAI following the Cosynch + CIDR protocol increased pregnancy rates in cycling cows with high P4 before the PGF2alpha injection and in anestrous cows with low P4 before PGF2alpha injection.

The use of a progesterone-releasing device (CIDR-B) or melengestrol acetate with GnRH, LH, or estradiol benzoate for fixed-time AI in beef heifers.

The objective of this experiment was to compare two progestins and three treatments for synchronizing follicular wave emergence and ovulation in protocols for fixed-time AI in beef heifers. On d 0 (beginning of the experiment), Angus and Angus-Simmental cross beef heifers at random stages of the estrous cycle either received a CIDR-B device (n = 257) or were started on 0.5 mg x anima(-1) x d(-1) melengestrol acetate (MGA; n = 246) and were randomly assigned to receive i.m. injections of 100 microg GnRH, 12.5 mg porcine LH (pLH), or 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and 50 mg progesterone (P4). The last feeding of MGA was given on d 6 and on d 7, CIDR-B devices were removed and all heifers received 500 microg cloprostenol (PG). Consistent with their treatment groups on d 0, heifers were given either 100 microg GnRH or 12.5 mg pLH 48 h after PG (and were concurrently inseminated) or 1 mg EB 24 h after PG and were inseminated 28 h later (52 h after PGF). Estrus rate (combined for both progestins) in heifers receiving EB (92.0%) was greater (P < 0.05) than that in heifers receiving GnRH and pLH (combined) and a CIDR-B device (62.9%) or MGA (34.3%). Although the mean interval from PG treatment to estrus did not differ among groups (overall, 47.8 h; P = 0.85), it was less variable (P < 0.01) in MGA-fed heifers (SD = 2.5 h) than in CIDR-B-treated heifers (SD = 8.1 h). Pregnancy rates (determined by ultrasonography approximately 30 d after AI) did not differ (P = 0.30) among the six treatment groups (average, 58.0%; range, 52.5 to 65.0%). Although fixed-time AI was done, pregnancy rates were greater in heifers detected in estrus than in those not detected in estrus (62.6 vs 51.9%; P < 0.05). In conclusion, GnRH, pLH, or EB treatment in combination with a CIDR-B device or MGA effectively synchronized ovulation-for fixed-time AI, resulting in acceptable pregnancy rates in beef heifers.

Synchronization of estrus in beef heifers using either melengesterol acetate (MGA)/prostaglandin or MGA/Select Synch.

The objective of this study was to evaluate synchronization, conception, and pregnancy rates of yearling beef heifers synchronized with either the Select Synch protocol preceded by 7 days of MGA feeding (MGA/Select Synch) or the traditional MGA/PGF protocol. Heifers in the MGA/Select Synch group (n = 402) were fed MGA (0.5 mg/day/head) for 7 days, received an injection of GnRH (100 microg) the day following the last MGA feeding and an injection of PGF (25 mg) 7 days after GnRH. Heifers in the MGA/PGF group (n = 394) received MGA (0.5 mg/day/head) for 14 days, followed by an injection of PGF (25 mg) 17 days later. Synchronization rates tended (P = 0.08) to be higher for the MGA/Select Synch (82%) compared to the MGA/PGF (77%)-treated heifers. Conception and pregnancy rates to AI were similar (P > 0.10), 57 and 46% for the MGA/Select Synch heifers and 61 and 47% for the MGA/PGF heifers, respectively. Mean estrous response (h) was earlier (P < 0.05) for the MGA/Select Synch versus MGA/PGF treatment, 56 versus 61 h post-PGF treatment, respectively. In summary, short-term (7 days) MGA feeding preceding the Select Synch protocol produced similar synchronization, conception, and pregnancy rates as the traditional MGA/PGF protocol.

The use of progestins in regimens for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle.

Four experiments were conducted to investigate modifications to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-based fixed-time Al protocols in beef cattle. In Experiment 1, the effect of reducing the interval from GnRH treatment to prostaglandin (PGF) was examined. Lactating beef cows (n = 111) were given 100 mg gonadorelin (GnRH) on Day 0 (start of treatment) and either 500 microg cloprostenol (PGF) on Day 6 with Al and 100 microg GnRH 60 h later, or PGF on Day 7 with Al and GnRH 48 h later (6- or 7-day Co-Synch regimens). Pregnancy rates were 32/61 (53.3%) versus 26/50 (52.0%), respectively (P = 0.96). In Experiment 2. cattle (n = 196) were synchronized with a 7-day Co-Synch regimen and received either no further treatment or a CIDR-B device (Days 0-7). Pregnancy rates were 32/71 (45.1%) versus 33/77 (42.9%) in cows (P < 0.8), and 9/23 (39.1 %) versus 17/25 (68.0%) in heifers (P < 0.05). In Experiment 3, 49 beef heifers were randomly assigned to receive 12.5 mg pLH on Day 0, PGF on Day 7 and 12.5 mg of pLH on Day 9 with Al 12 h later (pLH Ovsynch), or similar treatment plus a CIDR-B device from Days 0 to 7 (pLH Ovsynch + CIDR-B), or 1 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and 100 mg progesterone on Day 0, a CIDR-B device from Days 0 to 7 (EB/ P4 + CIDR-B), PGF on Day 7 (at the time of CIDR-B removal) and 1 mg i.m. EB on Day 8 with AI on Day 9 (52 h after PGF). Pregnancy rate in the EB/P4 + CIDR-B group (75.0%) was higher (P < 0.04) than in the pLH Ovsynch group (37.5%): the pLH Ovsynch + CIDR-B group was intermediate (64.7%). In Experiment 4, 266 non-lactating cows were allocated to a 7-day Co-Synch protocol (Co-Synch), a 7-day Co-Synch plus 0.6 mg per head per day melengestrol acetate (MGA) from Days 0 to 6 inclusive (Co-Synch + MGA) or MGA (Days 0-6) plus 2 mg EB and 50 mg progesterone on Day 0. 500 microg PGF on Day 7, 1 mg EB on Day 8 and fixed-time Al 28 h later (EB/ P4 + MGA). Pregnancy rates (P < 0.25) were 44.8% (39/87: Co-Synch), 47.8% (43/90; Co-Synch + MGA), and 60.7% (54/89: EB/P4 + MGA). In conclusion, a 6- or 7-day interval from GnRH to PGF in a Co-Synch regimen resulted in similar pregnancy rates in cows. The addition of a progestin to a Co-Synch or Ovsynch regimen significantly improved pregnancy rates in heifers but not in cows. Progestin-based regimens that included EB consistently resulted in high pregnancy rates to fixed-time Al.