Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 46
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 74(6): 2055-2062, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34186163

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Accurate documentation of patient care and acuity is essential to determine appropriate reimbursement as well as accuracy of key publicly reported quality metrics. We sought to investigate the impact of standardized note templates by inpatient advanced practice providers (APPs) on evaluation and management (E/M) charge capture, including outside of the global surgical package (GSP), and quality metrics including case mix index (CMI) and mortality index (MI). We hypothesized this clinical documentation initiative as well as improved coding of E/M services would result in increased reimbursement and quality metrics. METHODS: A documentation and coding initiative on the heart and vascular service line was initiated in 2016 with focus on improving inpatient E/M capture by APPs outside the GSP. Comprehensive training sessions and standardized documentation templates were created and implemented in the electronic medical record. Subsequent hospital care E/M (current procedural terminology codes 99231, 99232, 99233) from the years 2015 to 2017 were audited and analyzed for charge capture rates, collections, work relative value units (wRVUs), and billing complexity. Data were compared over time by standardizing CMS values and reimbursement rates. In addition, overall CMI and MI were calculated each year. RESULTS: One year following the documentation initiative, E/M charges on the vascular surgery service line increased by 78.5% with a corresponding increase in APP charges from 0.4% of billable E/M services to 70.4% when compared with pre-initiative data. The charge capture of E/M services among all inpatients rose from 21.4% to 37.9%. Additionally, reimbursement from CMS increased by 65% as total work relative value units generated from E/M services rose by 78.4% (797 to 1422). The MI decreased over the study period by 25.4%. Additionally, there was a corresponding 5.6% increase in the cohort CMI. Distribution of E/M encounter charges did not vary significantly. Meanwhile, the prevalence of 14 clinical comorbidities in our cohort as well as length of stay (P = .88) remained non-statistically different throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate clinical documentation of E/M care and ultimately inpatient acuity is critical in determining quality metrics that serve as important measures of overall hospital quality for CMS value-based payments and rankings. A system-based documentation initiative and expanded role of inpatient APPs on vascular surgery teams significantly improved charge capture and reimbursement outside the GSP as well as CMI and MI in a consistently complex patient population.


Assuntos
Pessoal Técnico de Saúde/economia , Documentação/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Gravidade do Paciente , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pessoal Técnico de Saúde/normas , Documentação/normas , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/normas
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(12): e2029068, 2020 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33306116

RESUMO

Importance: Medically complex patients are a heterogeneous group that contribute to a substantial proportion of health care costs. Coordinated efforts to improve care and reduce costs for this patient population have had limited success to date. Objective: To define distinct patient clinical profiles among the most medically complex patients through clinical interpretation of analytically derived patient clusters. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed the most medically complex patients within Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large integrated health care delivery system, based on comorbidity score, prior emergency department admissions, and predicted likelihood of hospitalization, from July 18, 2018, to July 15, 2019. From a starting point of over 5000 clinical variables, we used both clinical judgment and analytic methods to reduce to the 97 most informative covariates. Patients were then grouped using 2 methods (latent class analysis, generalized low-rank models, with k-means clustering). Results were interpreted by a panel of clinical stakeholders to define clinically meaningful patient profiles. Main Outcomes and Measures: Complex patient profiles, 1-year health care utilization, and mortality outcomes by profile. Results: The analysis included 104 869 individuals representing 3.3% of the adult population (mean [SD] age, 70.7 [14.5] years; 52.4% women; 39% non-White race/ethnicity). Latent class analysis resulted in a 7-class solution. Stakeholders defined the following complex patient profiles (prevalence): high acuity (9.4%), older patients with cardiovascular complications (15.9%), frail elderly (12.5%), pain management (12.3%), psychiatric illness (12.0%), cancer treatment (7.6%), and less engaged (27%). Patients in these groups had significantly different 1-year mortality rates (ranging from 3.0% for psychiatric illness profile to 23.4% for frail elderly profile; risk ratio, 7.9 [95% CI, 7.1-8.8], P < .001). Repeating the analysis using k-means clustering resulted in qualitatively similar groupings. Each clinical profile suggested a distinct collaborative care strategy to optimize management. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that highly medically complex patient populations may be categorized into distinct patient profiles that are amenable to varying strategies for resource allocation and coordinated care interventions.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/tendências , Múltiplas Afecções Crônicas , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Idoso , California/epidemiologia , Análise por Conglomerados , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Análise de Classes Latentes , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Mortalidade , Múltiplas Afecções Crônicas/classificação , Múltiplas Afecções Crônicas/economia , Múltiplas Afecções Crônicas/epidemiologia , Múltiplas Afecções Crônicas/terapia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Alocação de Recursos/métodos
3.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0234577, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32555696

RESUMO

The effects of hepatitis C virus (HCV), such as morbidity and mortality associated with cirrhosis and liver cancer, is a major public health issue in Australia. Highly effective treatment has recently been made available to all Australians living with HCV. A decision-analytic model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the hepatology partnership, compared to usual care. A Markov model was chosen, as it is state-based and able to include recursive events, which accurately reflects the natural history of the chronic and repetitive nature of HCV. Cost-effectiveness of the new model of care is indicated by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), where the mean change to costs associated with the new model of care is divided by the mean change in quality adjusted life-years (QALYs). Ten thousand iterations of the model were run, with the majority (73%) of ICERs representing cost-savings. In comparison to usual care, the intervention improves health outcomes (22.38 QALYs gained) and reduces costs by $42,122 per patient. When compared to usual care, a partnership approach to management of HCV is cost-effective and good value for money, even when key model parameters are changed in scenario analyses. Reduction in costs is driven by improved efficiency of the new model of care, where more patients are treated in a timely manner, away from the expensive tertiary setting. From an economic perspective, a reduction in hospital-based care is a positive outcome and represents a good investment for decision-makers who wish to maximise health gain per dollar spent.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Austrália , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Hepacivirus , Humanos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas
7.
J Crohns Colitis ; 12(12): 1418-1428, 2018 Nov 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30165593

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Crohn's disease may affect the ability to work and lead to permanent disability. We aimed to investigate work loss in prevalent patients. METHODS: We identified patients with Crohn's disease and general population comparators matched by sex, birth year, healthcare region and education. We assessed days of sick leave and disability pension retrieved from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency and estimated the absolute and relative risk of receiving disability pension [minimum 25% work impairment]. RESULTS: In 2014, the 20638 Crohn's disease patients [median age 44 years] had more than twice as many mean lost workdays [disability pension: 44; sick leave: 19] as the 102038 comparators [disability pension: 20; sick leave: 8], mean difference 35 days [95% confidence interval 33-37]. However, the majority had no lost workdays [68% of patients and 85% of comparators]. The proportion of patients receiving disability pension was 15% (6.5% in the comparators, risk ratio 2.34 [2.25-2.43]) and was higher in all subgroups, especially in female patients [28% vs 13% in the comparators], in those with ≤9 years of education [41% vs 23%] and in ages 60-64 years [46% vs 25%]. The relative risk of disability pension within the patient cohort [adjusted for age, sex, region and education] was higher in patients with complicated disease behaviour, extraintestinal manifestations, need of surgery or treatment with biologics. The differences between patients and comparators remained when comparing other calendar years [2006-2013]. CONCLUSION: Work loss was found in approximately one-third of patients. The mean number of lost workdays was twice as high as in the comparators.


Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Avaliação da Deficiência , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Licença Médica , Adulto , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/economia , Doença de Crohn/epidemiologia , Doença de Crohn/terapia , Pessoas com Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro por Deficiência/economia , Seguro por Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Licença Médica/economia , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Suécia/epidemiologia , Desempenho Profissional
8.
Am J Med ; 131(10): 1187-1199.e5, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29906429

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of cancer upon a patient's net worth and debt in the US. METHODS: This longitudinal study used the Health and Retirement Study from 1998-2014. Persons ≥50years with newly-diagnosed malignancies were included, excluding minor skin cancers. Multivariable generalized linear models assessed changes in net worth and debt (consumer, mortgage, home equity) at 2 and 4 years after diagnosis (year+2, year+4), controlling for demographic and clinically-related variables, cancer-specific attributes, economic factors, and mortality. A 2-year period before cancer diagnosis served as a historical control. RESULTS: Across 9.5 million estimated new diagnoses of cancer from 2000-2012, individuals averaged 68.6±9.4 years with slight majorities being married (54.7%), not retired (51.1%), and Medicare beneficiaries (56.6%). At year+2, 42.4% depleted their entire life's assets, with higher adjusted odds associated with worsening cancer, requirement of continued treatment, demographic and socioeconomic factors (ie, female, Medicaid, uninsured, retired, increasing age, income, and household size), and clinical characteristics (ie, current smoker, worse self-reported health, hypertension, diabetes, lung disease) (P<.05); average losses were $92,098. At year+4, financial insolvency extended to 38.2%, with several consistent socioeconomic, cancer-related, and clinical characteristics remaining significant predictors of complete asset depletion. CONCLUSIONS: This nationally-representative investigation of an initially-estimated 9.5 million newly-diagnosed persons with cancer who were ≥50 years of age found a substantial proportion incurring financial toxicity. As large financial burdens have been found to adversely affect access to care and outcomes among cancer patients, the active development of approaches to mitigate these effects among already vulnerable groups remains of key importance.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Declarações Financeiras/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/classificação , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Aposentadoria/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
Respir Care ; 63(5): 591-600, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29692353

RESUMO

COPD is an underdiagnosed, undertreated, and yet largely preventable disease. COPD affects millions of Americans on a daily basis, accounts for tens of thousands of deaths per year, and costs billions to the United States health-care system annually. Further, it impacts the quality of life for patients living with the disease. COPD care is fragmented in the United States, with a high level of responsibility placed on patients and their primary care physicians. Pulmonary specialists care for a minority of patients with COPD in the United States. Unfortunately, tobacco dependence, which is the leading cause of COPD, remains prevalent. Further, women and those with low socioeconomic status continue to share a relatively greater burden of disease. Exacerbations are experienced frequently by patients and contribute to high rates of emergency department visits and in-patient admissions and readmissions as well as high medical costs to the United States economy. Numerous strategies have been proposed to combat these high rates, including the use of discharge bundles, hospital at-home programs, telemedicine, and tele-rehabilitation, but no single best strategy has emerged. The COPD National Action Plan was introduced in 2017 as part of a multi-stakeholder endeavor to encourage collaboration among various patients, caregivers, physicians, researchers, and policymakers to optimize awareness, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease. It is time to make COPD care a public health priority.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Saúde Pública , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Prioridades em Saúde , Humanos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/organização & administração , Prevalência , Saúde Pública/métodos , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 71(10): 1078-1089, 2018 03 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29519347

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) imparts a heavy economic burden on the U.S. health care system. Evidence regarding the long-term costs after comprehensive CVD screening is limited. OBJECTIVES: This study calculated 10-year health care costs for 6,814 asymptomatic participants enrolled in MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), a registry sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. METHODS: Cumulative 10-year costs for CVD medications, office visits, diagnostic procedures, coronary revascularization, and hospitalizations were calculated from detailed follow-up data. Costs were derived by using Medicare nationwide and zip code-specific costs, inflation corrected, discounted at 3% per year, and presented in 2014 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: Risk factor prevalence increased dramatically and, by 10 years, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia was reported in 19%, 57%, and 53%, respectively. Self-reported symptoms (i.e., chest pain or shortness of breath) were common (approximately 40% of enrollees). At 10 years, approximately one-third of enrollees reported having an echocardiogram or exercise test, whereas 7% underwent invasive coronary angiography. These utilization patterns resulted in 10-year health care costs of $23,142. The largest proportion of costs was associated with CVD medication use (78%). Approximately $2 of every $10 were spent for outpatient visits and diagnostic testing among the elderly, obese, those with a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level >3 mg/l, or coronary artery calcium score (CACS) ≥400. Costs varied widely from <$7,700 for low-risk (Framingham risk score <6%, 0 CACS, and normal glucose measurements at baseline) to >$35,800 for high-risk (persons with diabetes, Framingham risk score ≥20%, or CACS ≥400) subgroups. Among high-risk enrollees, CVD costs accounted for $74 million of the $155 million consumed by MESA participants. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal patterns of health care resource use after screening revealed new evidence on the economic burden of treatment and testing patterns not previously reported. Maintenance of a healthy population has the potential to markedly reduce the economic burden of CVD among asymptomatic individuals.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Doenças Assintomáticas/economia , Doenças Assintomáticas/epidemiologia , Doenças Assintomáticas/terapia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 24(1): 4-12, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28963077

RESUMO

Patient-centered medical home models are fundamental to the advanced alternative payment models defined in the Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Plan Reauthorization Act (MACRA). The patient-centered medical home is a model of healthcare delivery supported by alternative payment mechanisms and designed to promote coordinated medical care that is simultaneously patient-centric and population-oriented. This transformative care model requires shifting reimbursement to include a per-patient payment intended to cover services not previously reimbursed such as disease management over time. Payment is linked to quality measures, including proportion of care delivered according to predefined pathways and demonstrated impact on outcomes. Some medical homes also include opportunities for shared savings by reducing overall costs of care. Recent proposals have suggested expanding the medical home model to specialized populations with complex needs because primary care teams may not have the facilities or the requisite expertise for their unique needs. An example of a successful care model that may provide valuable lessons for those creating specialty medical home models already exists in many hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) centers that deliver multidisciplinary, coordinated, and highly specialized care. The integration of care delivery in HCT centers has been driven by the specialty care their patients require and by the payment methodology preferred by the commercial payers, which has included bundling of both inpatient and outpatient care in the peritransplant interval. Commercial payers identify qualified HCT centers based on accreditation status and comparative performance, enabled in part by center-level comparative performance data available within a national outcomes database mandated by the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005. Standardization across centers has been facilitated via voluntary accreditation implemented by Foundation for the Accreditation of Cell Therapy. Payers have built on these community-established programs and use public outcomes and program accreditation as standards necessary for inclusion in specialty care networks and contracts. Although HCT centers have not been described as medical homes, most HCT providers have already developed the structures that address critical requirements of MACRA for medical homes.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/tendências , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia
12.
Eur Urol ; 73(4): 491-498, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28823605

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer treatment is a significant source of morbidity and spending. Some men with prostate cancer, particularly those with significant health problems, are unlikely to benefit from treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess relationships between financial incentives associated with urologist ownership of radiation facilities and treatment for prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2012. Patients were further classified by their risk of dying from noncancer causes in the 10 yr following their cancer diagnosis by using a mortality model derived from comparable patients known to be cancer-free. INTERVENTION: Urologists were categorized by their practice affiliation (single-specialty groups by size, multispecialty group) and ownership of a radiation facility. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND ANALYSIS: Use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and use of any treatment within 1 yr of diagnosis. Generalized estimating equations were used to adjust for patient differences. RESULTS: Among men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, use of IMRT ranged from 24% in multispecialty groups to 37% in large urology groups (p<0.001). Patients managed in groups with IMRT ownership (n=5133) were more likely to receive IMRT than those managed by single-specialty groups without ownership (43% vs 30%, p<0.001), regardless of group size. Among patients with a very high risk (> 75%) of noncancer mortality within 10 yr of diagnosis, both IMRT use (42% vs 26%, p<0.001) and overall treatment (53% vs 44%, p<0.001) were more likely in groups with ownership than in those without, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Urologists practicing in single-specialty groups with an ownership interest in radiation therapy are more likely to treat men with prostate cancer, including those with a high risk of noncancer mortality. PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed treatment for prostate cancer among urologists with varying levels of financial incentives favoring intervention. Those with stronger incentives, as determined by ownership interest in a radiation facility, were more likely to treat prostate cancer, even when treatment was unlikely to provide a survival benefit to the patient.


Assuntos
Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Administração da Prática Médica/organização & administração , Neoplasias da Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Urologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programa de SEER/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Urologia/métodos , Urologia/organização & administração
13.
Obstet Gynecol ; 130(6): 1269-1275, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29112648

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost of care during the first year after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer, estimate the sources of cost, and explore the out-of-pocket costs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2009 to 2012 who underwent both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy using the Truven Health MarketScan database. This database is comprised of patients covered by commercial insurance sponsored by more than 100 employers in the United States. Medical expenditures, including physician reimbursement, for a 12-month period beginning on the date of surgery were estimated. All payments were examined, including out-of-pocket costs for patients. Payments were divided into expenditures for inpatient care, outpatient care (including chemotherapy), and outpatient drug costs. The 12-month treatment period was divided into three phases: surgery to 30 days (operative period), 1-6 months (adjuvant therapy), and 6-12 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the overall cost of care within the first year of diagnosis of ovarian cancer; secondary outcomes included assessment of factors associated with cost. RESULTS: A total of 26,548 women with ovarian cancer who underwent surgery were identified. After exclusion of patients with incomplete insurance enrollment or coverage, those who did not undergo chemotherapy, and those with capitated plans, our cohort consisted of 5,031 women. The median total medical expenditures per patient during the first year after the index procedure were $93,632 (interquartile range $62,319-140,140). Inpatient services accounted for $30,708 (interquartile range $20,102-51,107; 37.8%) in expenditures, outpatient services $52,700 (interquartile range $31,210-83,206; 58.3%), and outpatient drug costs $1,814 (interquartile range $603-4,402; 3.8%). The median out-of-pocket expense was $2,988 (interquartile range $1,649-5,088). This included $1,509 (interquartile range $705-2,878) for outpatient services, $589 (interquartile range $3-1,715) for inpatient services, and $351 (interquartile range $149-656) for outpatient drug costs. CONCLUSION: The average cost of care for women with ovarian cancer in the first year after surgery is approximately $100,000. Patients bear approximately 3% of these costs in the form of out-of-pocket expenses.


Assuntos
Quimioterapia Adjuvante/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Alocação de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
14.
S D Med ; Spec No: 37-41, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28817861

RESUMO

Population health management (PHM) is a new health care model being implemented. It has been defined as "the health outcomes of a group of individuals, including the distribution of such outcomes within the group." This includes health outcomes and patterns of health determinants, and policies and interventions that link these two. Moving from a fee-for-service payment system to a quality- or value-based system, this model places on the clinician more responsibility for the costs of health care and its reimbursements. Screening for disease is an area that could benefit from PHM. Electronic health records (EHRs) employ algorithms to capture PHMrelated data such as diagnostic codes, clinical quality indicators, and other parameters useful in identifying those for whom screening is appropriate and in monitoring the efficacy at implementing the screening in the clinic's population. Registries of patients at risk for a variety of diseases are created in the EHR, and these patients can be notified to visit with their clinician for a shared decision-making conversation about the screening. PHM requires a team approach to input, analyze, and implement this data. The physicians must be the driving force behind population health, but advanced practice clinicians, nurses, case managers, quality coordinators, information technology support, and many others collaborate to make this successful.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionais , Inovação Organizacional , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Estados Unidos
16.
World J Urol ; 35(10): 1617-1623, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28229209

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of various treatment strategies in the management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries using decision analysis. METHODS: Five strategies were modeled from the time of injury to resolution of obstructed voiding or progression to urethroplasty. Management consisted of immediate suprapubic tube (SPT) placement and delayed urethroplasty; primary endoscopic realignment (PER) followed by urethroplasty in failed patients; or PER followed by 1-3 direct vision internal urethrotomies (DVIU), followed by urethroplasty. Success rates were obtained from the literature. Total medical costs were estimated and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were generated over a 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: PER was preferred over SPT placement in all iterations of the model. PER followed by a single DVIU and urethroplasty in cases of failure was least costly and used as the referent approach with an average cost-effectiveness of $17,493 per unobstructed voider. The ICER of a second DVIU prior to urethroplasty was $86,280 per unobstructed voider, while the ICER of a third DVIU was $172,205. The model was sensitive to changes in the success rate of the first DVIU, where when the probability of DVIU success is expected to be less than 32% immediate urethroplasty after failed PER is favored. CONCLUSIONS: Management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries with PER is the preferred management strategy according to the current model. For those who fail PER, a single DVIU may be attempted if the presumed success rate is >32%. In all other cases, urethroplasty following PER is the preferred approach.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Ossos Pélvicos/lesões , Uretra , Estreitamento Uretral , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnóstico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Masculino , Modelos Econômicos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/economia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Estados Unidos , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagem , Uretra/lesões , Uretra/fisiopatologia , Uretra/cirurgia , Estreitamento Uretral/diagnóstico , Estreitamento Uretral/etiologia , Estreitamento Uretral/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações
17.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 102(1): 123-130, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28074472

RESUMO

The adoption of a preemptive UGT1A1*28 genotyping to increase irinotecan safety in clinical practice is still limited. This is the first actual study of costs associated with the management of irinotecan-related toxicities, and their association with UGT1A1*28 genotype. A retrospective analysis of the cost of toxicity management was conducted on 243 metastatic colorectal cancer patients enrolled in a clinical trial and treated with standard of care FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil combined with irinotecan). The mean predicted cost per patient was higher for *28/*28 (€4,886), vs. *1/*1 (€812), (regression coefficient 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.31-2.28; P < 0.001) and for *1/*28 (€1,119) vs. *1/*1 (regression coefficient 0.32, 95% CI = 0.04-0.60; P = 0.024). This is consistent with a different grade 4 toxicity profile among the three genotypes, and a higher frequency of costly interventions like hospitalization among patients with the *28 allele. A differential toxicity management cost by *28 genotype is herein demonstrated, representing a first step towards the demonstration of the test clinical utility.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Colorretais , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Glucuronosiltransferase/genética , Irinotecano , Testes Farmacogenômicos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/economia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/genética , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/terapia , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Irinotecano/administração & dosagem , Irinotecano/efeitos adversos , Irinotecano/farmacocinética , Itália , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Testes Farmacogenômicos/economia , Testes Farmacogenômicos/métodos , Variantes Farmacogenômicos/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inibidores da Topoisomerase I/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Topoisomerase I/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Topoisomerase I/farmacocinética
18.
J Hepatol ; 66(2): 313-319, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27717864

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Many patients have elevated serum aminotransferases reflecting many underlying conditions, both common and rare. Clinicians generally apply one of two evaluative strategies: testing for all diseases at once (extensive) or just common diseases first (focused). METHODS: We simulated the evaluation of 10,000 adult outpatients with elevated with alanine aminotransferase to compare both testing strategies. Model inputs employed population-based data from the US (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) and Britain (Birmingham and Lambeth Liver Evaluation Testing Strategies). Patients were followed until a diagnosis was provided or a diagnostic liver biopsy was considered. The primary outcome was US dollars per diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included doctor visits per diagnosis, false-positives per diagnosis and confirmatory liver biopsies ordered. RESULTS: The extensive testing strategy required the lowest monetary cost, yielding diagnoses for 54% of patients at $448/patient compared to 53% for $502 under the focused strategy. The extensive strategy also required fewer doctor visits (1.35 vs. 1.61 visits/patient). However, the focused strategy generated fewer false-positives (0.1 vs. 0.19/patient) and more biopsies (0.04 vs. 0.08/patient). Focused testing becomes the most cost-effective strategy when accounting for pre-test probabilities and prior evaluations performed. This includes when the respective prevalence of alcoholic, non-alcoholic and drug-induced liver disease exceeds 51.1%, 53.0% and 13.0%. Focused testing is also the most cost-effective strategy in the referral setting where assessments for viral hepatitis, alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease have already been performed. CONCLUSIONS: Testing for elevated liver enzymes should be deliberate and focused to account for pre-test probabilities if possible. LAY SUMMARY: Many patients have elevated liver enzymes reflecting one of many possible liver diseases, some of which are very common and some of which are rare. Tests are widely available for most causes but it is unclear whether clinicians should order them all at once or direct testing based on how likely a given disease may be given the patient's history and physical exam. The tradeoffs of both approaches involve the money spent on testing, number of office visits needed, and false positive results generated. This study shows that if there are no clues available at the time of evaluation, testing all at once saves time and money while causing more false positives. However, if there are strong clues regarding the likelihood of a particular disease, limited testing saves time, money and prevents false positives.


Assuntos
Alanina Transaminase/sangue , Aspartato Aminotransferases/sangue , Hepatopatias , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Adulto , Simulação por Computador , Análise Custo-Benefício , Tomada de Decisões Assistida por Computador , Feminino , Humanos , Fígado/enzimologia , Fígado/patologia , Hepatopatias/diagnóstico , Hepatopatias/economia , Testes de Função Hepática/métodos , Testes de Função Hepática/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos
19.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 15: 306, 2015 Aug 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26238996

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is momentum internationally to improve coordination of complex care pathways. Robust evaluations of such interventions are scarce. This paper evaluates the cost-utility of cancer care coordinators for stage III colon cancer patients, who generally require surgery followed by chemotherapy. METHODS: We compared a hospital-based nurse cancer care coordinator (CCC) with 'business-as-usual' (no dedicated coordination service) in stage III colon cancer patients in New Zealand. A discrete event microsimulation model was constructed to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs from a health system perspective. We used New Zealand data on colon cancer incidence, survival, and mortality as baseline input parameters for the model. We specified intervention input parameters using available literature and expert estimates. For example, that a CCC would improve the coverage of chemotherapy by 33% (ranging from 9 to 65%), reduce the time to surgery by 20% (3 to 48%), reduce the time to chemotherapy by 20% (3 to 48%), and reduce patient anxiety (reduction in disability weight of 33%, ranging from 0 to 55%). RESULTS: Much of the direct cost of a nurse CCC was balanced by savings in business-as-usual care coordination. Much of the health gain was through increased coverage of chemotherapy with a CCC (especially older patients), and reduced time to chemotherapy. Compared to 'business-as-usual', the cost per QALY of the CCC programme was $NZ 18,900 (≈ $US 15,600; 95% UI: $NZ 13,400 to 24,600). By age, the CCC intervention was more cost-effective for colon cancer patients < 65 years ($NZ 9,400 per QALY). By ethnicity, the health gains were larger for Maori, but so too were the costs, meaning the cost-effectiveness was roughly comparable between ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Such a nurse-led CCC intervention in New Zealand has acceptable cost-effectiveness for stage III colon cancer, meaning it probably merits funding. Each CCC programme will differ in its likely health gains and costs, making generalisation from this evaluation to other CCC interventions difficult. However, this evaluation suggests that CCC interventions that increase coverage of, and reduce time to, effective treatments may be cost-effective.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários
20.
Genet Res (Camb) ; 97: e13, 2015 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26030725

RESUMO

Pharmacogenetic/pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is currently available for a wide range of health problems including cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, autoimmune disorders, mental health disorders and infectious diseases. PGx contributes important information to the field of precision medicine by clarifying appropriate treatments for specific disease subtypes. Tangible benefits to patients including improved outcomes and reduced total health care costs have been observed. However, PGx-guided therapy faces many barriers to full integration into clinical practice and acceptance by stakeholders, whether practitioner, patient or payer. Each stakeholder has a unique perspective on the role of PGx testing, although all are similarly challenged with demonstrating or appraising its cost-to-benefit value. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of PGx testing. The acceleration of adoption of precision medicine in general and for PGx testing in particular will be determined by how quickly robust evidence can be accumulated that shows a return on investment for payers in terms of real dollars, for clinicians in terms of patient clinical responses, and for patients in terms of economic, health and quality of life outcomes. Trends in PGx testing utilization and uptake by payers in real-world practice are discussed; the role of pharmacoeconomics in assessing cost-effectiveness is highlighted using a case study in psychiatric care, and several issues that will affect adoption of PGx testing in the United States (US) over the next few years are reviewed.


Assuntos
Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Farmacogenética/métodos , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Testes Genéticos/economia , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Farmacogenética/economia , Medicina de Precisão/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA