Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 177
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684422

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The study aims to assess the effects of dexmedetomidine (Dex) pretreatment on patients during cardiac valve replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: For patients in the Dex group (n = 52), 0.5 µg/kg Dex was given before anesthesia induction, followed by 0.5 µg/kg/h pumping injection before aortic occlusion. For patients in the control group (n = 52), 0.125 ml/kg normal saline was given instead of Dex. RESULTS: The patients in the Dex group had longer time to first dose of rescue propofol than the control group (P = 0.003). The Dex group required less total dosage of propofol than the control group (P = 0.0001). The levels of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), creatine kinase isoenzyme MB (CK-MB), malondialdehyde (MDA), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were lower in the Dex group than the control group at T4, 8 h after the operation (T5), and 24 h after the operation (T6) (P <0.01). The Dex group required less time for mechanical ventilation than the control group (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that 0.50 µg/kg Dex pretreatment could reduce propofol use and the duration of mechanical ventilation, and confer myocardial protection without increased adverse events during cardiac valve replacement.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Dexmedetomidina , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Propofol , Respiração Artificial , Troponina I , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Dexmedetomidina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fatores de Tempo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Biomarcadores/sangue , Troponina I/sangue , Creatina Quinase Forma MB/sangue , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/sangue , Malondialdeído/sangue , Idoso , Adulto , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Traumatismo por Reperfusão Miocárdica/prevenção & controle , Traumatismo por Reperfusão Miocárdica/etiologia
2.
Comput Math Methods Med ; 2022: 9275406, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35211189

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction after kidney transplantation may be influenced by many reasons. This study was designed to evaluate whether the administration of dexmedetomidine (Dex) could ameliorate renal function and prognosis after kidney transplantation. METHODS: A total of 65 patients were divided into Dex group (n = 33) and Con group (Con, n = 32). Dex group intravenously received an initial loading dose of 0.6 µg/kg Dex for 15 min before anaesthesia induction, followed by a rate of 0.4 µg/kg/h until 30 min after kidney reperfusion. By contrast, Con group received saline. The concentration of urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), serum creatinine (Cr), blood urea, urine output, ß2 microglobulin (ß2-MG), Cystatin C (CysC), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was recorded and compared between two groups during the course of the hospitalization or follow-up. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR), vasoactive drugs, and anaesthetics were recorded during the operation. Pain degree was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) after operation. Delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss, length of hospital stay, and mortality were compared between groups. RESULTS: The concentration of KIM-1 in Dex group was lower than Con group at 2 h (P = 0.018), 24 h (P = 0.013), 48 h (P < 0.01), and 72 h (P < 0.01) after reperfusion. MAP of Dex group after tracheal intubation (P = 0.012) and incision (P = 0.018) and HR after intubation (P = 0.021) were lower than that of Con group. The dosage of sufentanil during operation in Dex group was less than Con group (P = 0.039). Patients that used atropine in Dex group were more than Con group (P = 0.027). Patients who received Dex presented with lower VAS scores at 6 h (P = 0.01) and 12 h (P = 0.002) after operation. Concentration of serum Cr and blood urea had no significant differences between groups before operation and on postoperative day 1 to 6. Urine output was recorded for 6 days after operation and had no differences between groups. Also, no differences were identified between two groups in urea, Cr, ß2-MG, CysC, and eGFR in the first 3 months after operation. Incidence of DGF after operation was detected no difference between groups, while length of hospital stay in Dex group was less than Con group (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Dex can decrease kidney injury marker level, attenuate perioperative stress, relieve the dosage of sufentanil and postoperative pain, and reduce length of hospital stay. However, Dex is not associated with changes in prognosis in the first 3 months after transplantation.


Assuntos
Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/fisiopatologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/prevenção & controle , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biomarcadores/urina , Biologia Computacional , Feminino , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Falência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Testes de Função Renal , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Prognóstico , Substâncias Protetoras/administração & dosagem , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/etiologia , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/fisiopatologia , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/prevenção & controle
3.
Comput Math Methods Med ; 2021: 3822450, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34938353

RESUMO

Brachial plexus block commonly used in finger replantation has the advantages of simple operation, small side effects, and stable circulation, but it has inherent problems such as imperfect block range, slow onset of anesthesia, and short maintenance time of anesthesia. In order to explore the reliable clinical anesthesia effect, this paper uses experimental investigation methods to study the effect of dexmedetomidine in clinical surgery of replantation of severed fingers. Moreover, this paper uses comparative test methods, uses statistical methods to process test data, and uses intuitive methods to display test results. Finally, this paper verifies the reliability of dexmedetomidine in replantation of severed finger through comparative analysis and verifies that the anesthesia method proposed in this paper has certain user satisfaction through parameter survey.


Assuntos
Amputação Traumática/cirurgia , Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial/métodos , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Traumatismos dos Dedos/cirurgia , Dedos/cirurgia , Reimplante/métodos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Biologia Computacional , Humanos
4.
Biomed Res Int ; 2021: 8652028, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34859103

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a low-dose perioperative infusion of Dex reduces early POCD. DESIGN: This study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that randomly assigned patients to Dex or saline placebo infused during surgery and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) infusion. Patients were assessed for postoperative cognitive decline. Interventions. Dex was infused at a loading dose of 0.5 µg/kg intravenously (15 min after entering the operation room) followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5 µg/kg/h until one-lung ventilation or artificial pneumothorax ended. Patients in the Dex group received regular PCIA pump with additional dose of Dex (200 µg). RESULTS: In total, 126 patients were randomized, and 102 patients were involved in the result analysis. The incidence of POCD was 36.54% (19/52) in the Dex group and 32.00% (16/50) in the normal saline (NS) group, with no statistic difference. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Modified (TICS-m) scores at different times. However, the TICS-m score at 7 days after surgery was significantly lower than that at 30 days in 102 patients (32.93 ± 0.42 vs. 33.92 ± 0.47, P = 0.03). The visual analogue scale scores in the Dex group were significantly lower than those in the NS group 1 day postoperation at rest and activity (2.00 [1.00-3.00] vs. 3.00 [2.00-4.00], P < 0.01; 4.00 [3.00-5.00] vs. 5.00 [4.00-6.00], P < 0.05, respectively). Patients receiving Dex or NS had no statistical difference in activities of daily living (ADLs) scores at 7 and 30 days after surgery, but the ADL score at 30 days after surgery showed a significant reduction compared with that at 7 days (P < 0.01). Patients in the Dex group had a shorter hospital length of stay (15.26 ± 3.77 vs. 17.69 ± 5.09, P = 0.02) and less expenses (52458.71 ± 10649.30 vs. 57269.03 ± 9269.98, P = 0.04) than those in the NS group. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose Dex in the perioperative period did not reduce the incidence of early POCD in thoracic surgery. However, it relieved postoperative pain, decreased the hospitalization expenses, and shortened the length of stay.


Assuntos
Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Complicações Cognitivas Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/efeitos adversos , Atividades Cotidianas , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Período Perioperatório , Complicações Cognitivas Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Cognitivas Pós-Operatórias/psicologia , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(34): e27064, 2021 Aug 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34449500

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (Dexm), a selective alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist, and dexamethasone (Dexa), a very potent and highly selective glucocorticoid, have both been proven effectively to prolong the duration of local anesthetics (LA) in regional anesthesia. However, data comparing the efficacy of Dexm and Dexa as perineural adjuvants are inconsistent. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare the effects of Dexm and Dexa when used as LA adjuvants on peripheral nerve block (PNB). METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases up to October, 2020. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes included incidence of rescue analgesia, cumulative opioid consumption, time required for onset of sensory and motor blockades, duration of sensory and motor blockades, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and side effect-associated outcomes (e.g., bradycardia, sedation, hypotension, rates of infection, and neurological complications). The study was registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42020188796. RESULTS: After screening of full-text relevant articles, 13 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved for this systematic review. It was revealed that perineural Dexm provided equivalent analgesic duration to perineural Dexa. Besides, the intake of Dexm increased the incidence of rescue analgesia in limbs surgery, as well as the cumulative opioid consumption, and decreased the time required for onset of sensory and motor blockades for long-acting LA (all P < .05). Other analysis revealed insignificant difference between the 2 groups in terms of the incidence of PONV (P > .05). Additionally, 2 studies demonstrated that Dexm possesses more sedative properties than Dexa (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicated that the analgesic duration of Dexm and Dexa as LA adjuvants in PNB is the same. Meanwhile, the effects of perineural Dexm and Dexa on some secondary outcomes, including the incidence of rescue analgesia, cumulative opioid consumption, and time required for onset of sensory and motor blockades, are associated with the surgical site and type of LA.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Local/métodos , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Adjuvantes Anestésicos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Nervos Periféricos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
6.
Curr Neurovasc Res ; 18(1): 85-92, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011258

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a leading cause of blindness in elderly people. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF)-drugs are used to treat AMD patients; however, some patients are resistant to these therapies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the anti-angiogenic effects of α2-adrenergic agonists, including guanabenz and clonidine. METHODS: We evaluated the anti-angiogenic effects of α2-adrenergic agonists in human retinal microvascular endothelial cells (HRMECs). A proliferation assay was conducted, and the migration ratio was evaluated. In a laser-induced CNV model, guanabenz and clonidine were delivered via intraperitoneal injection or implantation of an osmotic pump device. Fourteen days following CNV induction, CNV lesion size and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were evaluated. RESULTS: Guanabenz and clonidine inhibited VEGF-induced retinal endothelial cell growth and migration. In the CNV model mice, CNV lesion sizes were reduced by intraperitoneal administration of guanabenz or clonidine. Data, including body weight, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate showed that guanabenz (0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg/day) had little effect on these parameters; conversely, a high dose of clonidine (1.0 mg/kg/day) did affect these parameters. Additionally, clonidine did not affect CNV size, but continuous administration of guanabenz attenuated both CNV size and leakage from neovessels. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests a key role for α2-adrenergic receptors during CNV formation. Therefore, we suggest that α2-adrenergic receptor agonists may represent novel therapeutic drugs for patients with neovascular AMD.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/uso terapêutico , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Neovascularização de Coroide/tratamento farmacológico , Clonidina/uso terapêutico , Guanabenzo/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Animais , Movimento Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Neovascularização de Coroide/patologia , Clonidina/administração & dosagem , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Células Endoteliais/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Endoteliais/patologia , Guanabenzo/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Camundongos , Retina/efeitos dos fármacos , Retina/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/farmacologia
7.
Heart Surg Forum ; 24(2): E376-E378, 2021 04 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33891540

RESUMO

We report a case of a 24-year-old male patient with blunt brachiocephalic trunk injury, who was given low-dose dexmedetomidine (DEX) for 2 weeks to help smoothly pass the preparation period before the recanalization operation. Because the patient's vital signs were stable after the injury, the surgeon did not perform emergency surgery. Taking into account the characteristics of blunt brachiocephalic trunk injury, it is necessary to avoid damage to or even rupture of brachiocephalic trunk resulting from irritability and high blood pressure. Patients should be sedated to avoid hemodynamic fluctuations that may be caused by cerebral ischemia and restlessness, and based on the patient's neurological symptoms, prevention or treatment of perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PNDs) cannot be ignored. Therefore, the choice of drugs for bridging the preoperative preparation stage is crucial. DEX is an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist with antianxiety, analgesic, and sedative effects. It can also stabilize hemodynamics, regulate neuroinflammation, and provide neuroprotection. Instead of using either ß-adrenergic receptor antagonists or sedatives, the patient received only low-dose DEX during preoperative preparation. DEX achieved the effects of ß-adrenergic receptor blockers, vasodilators, and other sedatives, and it also had certain benefits for the patient's PND. In short, based on our understanding of the relevant physiological factors, risk factors of brachiocephalic trunk injury, and the effects of DEX, low-dose DEX provides a good option for preoperative management in a patient with blunt brachiocephalic trunk injury.


Assuntos
Tronco Braquiocefálico/lesões , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Gerenciamento Clínico , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Tronco Braquiocefálico/diagnóstico por imagem , Tronco Braquiocefálico/cirurgia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Resultado do Tratamento , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/fisiopatologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
Vet Surg ; 50(5): 990-998, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33797093

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of a continuous rate infusion of detomidine hydrochloride and romifidine hydrochloride for standing elective bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy in mares. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded, randomized prospective clinical study. ANIMALS: Eighteen healthy mares presenting for elective bilateral ovariectomy METHODS: Mares were randomly assigned to one of two sedation protocols. Prior to surgery, baseline head height, heart rate, respiratory rate, and postural sway were recorded. An IV loading dose of α2-agonist (46 µg/kg romifidine or 13.9 µg/kg detomidine) was administered. Standing sedation was maintained with a continuous rate infusion of the respective α2-agonist (126 µg/kg/h romifidine or 37.8 µg/kg/h detomidine). Intraoperative measurements included respiratory rate, heart rate, head height, postural sway, and response to surgical stimulus. Postoperatively, fecal output was recorded, and pain scoring was performed using composite pain score and visual analog scales. RESULTS: Three of 18 horses required additional α-2 agonists: one detomidine and two romifidine and butorphanol. Head height during surgery was lower (p < .001) in mares receiving detomidine. Postural sway around the vertical axis was greater in mares sedated with detomidine rather than romifidine (p = .013). No differences were detected in intraoperative heart rate, postoperative pain scores or postoperative fecal output between sedation techniques. CONCLUSION: Comparable scores for surgical stimulation and sedation were measured in both sedation groups. No differences in postoperative analgesia or manure production were identified. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Romifidine appears suitable as an alternative to detomidine and may limit ataxia and head drop in sedated horses.


Assuntos
Cavalos/cirurgia , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/farmacologia , Imidazóis/farmacologia , Ovariectomia/veterinária , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/farmacologia , Anestesia/veterinária , Animais , Butorfanol/administração & dosagem , Butorfanol/farmacologia , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Infusões Intravenosas/veterinária , Laparoscopia/veterinária , Ovariectomia/métodos , Dor/veterinária , Estudos Prospectivos
9.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther ; 37(4): 230-235, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33684337

RESUMO

Purpose: In this study, we wanted to retrospectively evaluate the effect of the use of topical brimonidine on intraoperative bleeding and surgical hemostasis before strabismus surgery. Methods: Brimonidine tartrate 0.15% (Brimogut, Bilim Ilac, Turkey) eye drops were applied 6 and 3 min before surgery to 44 eyes of 22 patients in group 1 for vasoconstriction. Drops were not applied to 46 eyes of 23 patients in group 2. Preoperative and postoperative photographs and video images were taken. Black-and-white images were used to define the surface areas of the blood vessels. The surface area was calculated by counting the black pixels with ImageJ software. Results: In group 1, redness of eye was observed, on average, at preoperative 339.25 ± 11.52 pixels and intraoperative 247.93 ± 10.63 pixels (P < 0.001). But there was no change in group 2 (preoperative 338.87 ± 8.45 pixels to intraoperative 339.71 ± 9.52 pixels, P > 0.05). The incidence of intraoperative bleeding evaluated by the number of eyes on which cautery was used shows that it was significantly less in group 1 than in group 2 (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of topical brimonidine before strabismus surgery facilitates clear monitoring of anatomical structures during surgery by effectively controlling hemorrhage. In the postoperative period, it significantly reduces subconjunctival hemorrhage.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Tartarato de Brimonidina/administração & dosagem , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Estrabismo/cirurgia , Administração Tópica , Adolescente , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/farmacologia , Tartarato de Brimonidina/efeitos adversos , Tartarato de Brimonidina/farmacologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Doenças da Túnica Conjuntiva/epidemiologia , Doenças da Túnica Conjuntiva/patologia , Hemorragia Ocular/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Ocular/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Hemostasia Cirúrgica , Humanos , Hiperemia/induzido quimicamente , Hiperemia/epidemiologia , Hiperemia/prevenção & controle , Incidência , Masculino , Soluções Oftálmicas , Fotografação/métodos , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
10.
Anesth Analg ; 132(2): 320-328, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32639389

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Consecutive exposure to high-dose remifentanil during anesthesia may induce remifentanil-induced postinfusion hyperalgesia (RPH). Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, may have synergistic effects with opioids and aid in perioperative pain management. In this study, we hypothesized that an intraoperative bolus dose of intravenous dexmedetomidine could alleviate RPH in patients undergoing thyroidectomy under general anesthesia. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: placebo, normal saline (group P); low-dose dexmedetomidine 0.2 µg·kg-1 (group LD); or high-dose dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg·kg-1 (group HD). Remifentanil was infused at a rate of 0.30 µg·kg-1·minute-1. Mechanical pain thresholds were measured using an Electronic von Frey device preoperatively and at 30 minutes, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery and were analyzed with 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post hoc comparison. We also recorded postoperative pain scores, the incidence of receiving rescue analgesics, and side effects up to 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS: The mechanical pain thresholds around the skin incision were significantly higher in group LD compared to group P 30 minutes and 6 hours after surgery (mean ± standard deviation: [65.0 ± 25.2] vs [49.6 ± 24.4] g, mean difference [95% confidence interval]: 15.4 [0.3-30.5] g, P = .045 at 30 minutes; [65.9 ± 24.5] vs [49.3 ± 26.1] g, 16.6 [1.1-32.1] g, P = .032 at 6 hours). The pain thresholds around the skin incision were significantly higher in group HD compared to group P 30 minutes and 6 hours after surgery ([67.8 ± 21.7] vs [49.6 ± 24.4] g, 18.2 [3.1-33.3] g, P = .013 at 30 minutes; [68.3 ± 22.5] vs [49.3 ± 26.1] g, 19.0 [3.5-34.5] g, P = .011 at 6 hours). The incidence of hyperalgesia around the skin incision was lower in group HD than in group P 30 minutes and 6 hours after surgery (4 [13%] vs 14 [48%], P = .012 at 30 minutes, 4 [13%] vs 12 [41%], P = .045 at 6 hours), although no significant difference was observed between group LD and group P. Postoperative pain scores, the incidence of rescue analgesic demand, and postoperative side effects were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: An intraoperative intravenous bolus dose of dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg·kg-1 alleviates remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia in patients undergoing thyroidectomy without a significant difference in side effects.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Hiperalgesia/prevenção & controle , Limiar da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Remifentanil/administração & dosagem , Tireoidectomia , Administração Intravenosa , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , China , Dexmedetomidina/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperalgesia/induzido quimicamente , Hiperalgesia/diagnóstico , Hiperalgesia/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Remifentanil/efeitos adversos , Tireoidectomia/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
11.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 14: 5155-5166, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33262576

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lung resection and one lung ventilation (OLV) during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) may lead to acute lung injury. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a highly selective α2 adrenergic receptor agonist, improves arterial oxygenation in adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery. The aim of this pilot study was to explore possible mechanism related to lung protection of DEX in patients undergoing VATS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-four patients scheduled for VATS were enrolled in this study. Three timepoints (before anesthesia induction (T0), 40 min after OLV (T1), and 10 min after two-lung ventilation (T2)) of arterial blood gas were obtained. Meanwhile, lung histopathologic examination, immunohistochemistry analysis (occludin and ZO-1), levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6 in lung tissue and plasma, and activation of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α signaling were detected. Postoperative outcomes including duration of withdrawing the pleural drainage tube, length of hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) were also recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were randomly divided into DEX group (group D, n=33) and control group (group N, n=34). DEX improved oxygenation at T1 and T2 (group D vs group N; T1: 191.8 ± 49.8 mmHg vs 159.6 ± 48.1 mmHg, P = 0.009; T2: 406.0 mmHg [392.2-423.7] vs 374.5 mmHg [340.2-378.2], P = 0.001). DEX alleviated the alveolar capillary epithelial structure damage, increased protein expression of ZO-1 and occludin, inhibited elevation of the expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in lung tissue and plasma, and increased protein expression of p-PI3K, p-AKT and HIF-1α. Dex administered had better postoperative outcomes with less risk of PPCs and hospitalization expenses as well as shorter duration of withdrawing the pleural drainage tube and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Activation of PI3K/Akt/HIF-1α signaling might be involved in lung protection of DEX in patients undergoing VATS.


Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/cirurgia , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/farmacologia , Dexmedetomidina/farmacologia , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/metabolismo , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/química , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Dexmedetomidina/química , Feminino , Humanos , Subunidade alfa do Fator 1 Induzível por Hipóxia/genética , Subunidade alfa do Fator 1 Induzível por Hipóxia/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases/genética , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases/metabolismo , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos
12.
J Glaucoma ; 29(11): 1043-1049, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740502

RESUMO

PRECIS: This study evaluated 2 doses of intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) (3.0 and 3.5 µg/kg) as a procedural sedative for postoperative examination of children with glaucoma. A dose of 3.5 µg/kg was more efficacious and obviated the need for repeated general anesthesia. PURPOSE: This study was carried out to determine the safety and effective dose of IND as a procedural sedative for postoperative follow-up examinations after glaucoma surgery in children in place of repeated examination under anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized double-blinded interventional study, consecutive children aged 6 months to 6 years were randomized to receive 3.0 and 3.5 µg/kg IND using a mucosal atomizer device in the preoperative area of the operating room, under continuous monitoring of vital signs. Intranasal midazolam 0.25 mg/kg was used as a rescue agent in case of inadequate sedation, and general anesthesia was administered in case of persistent failure. All infants underwent a complete anterior and posterior segment evaluation including intraocular pressure and corneal diameter measurements. RESULTS: A total of 30 and 31 children aged 23.9±15.0 and 19.2±10.1 months, respectively, received 3.0 and 3.5 µg/kg IND. Adequate sedation was possible in 18 of 30 (60%) children receiving 3.0 µg/kg and 24 of 31 (77.4%) receiving 3.5 µg/kg IND alone (P=0.17). In combination with midazolam, successful sedations were 86.6% versus 100%, respectively (P=0.052). One patient in the 3.5 µg/kg group had ventricular arrhythmia, reversed with dextrose-saline infusion and injection glycopyrrolate. CONCLUSIONS: IND appears to be a safe and effective procedural sedative for postoperative follow-up examinations of pediatric glaucoma patients at doses of 3 and 3.5 µg/kg. The dose of 3.5 µg/kg was successful in more children.


Assuntos
Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Glaucoma/diagnóstico , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Exame Físico , Administração Intranasal , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Geral , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Pressão Intraocular , Masculino , Midazolam/administração & dosagem , Soluções Oftálmicas , Estudos Prospectivos
13.
J Glaucoma ; 29(10): 846-850, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740512

RESUMO

PRECIS: Preoperative intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine produced a 33% reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) within 15 minutes of administration in patients with glaucoma. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of preoperative IV dexmedetomidine on IOP in adult patients undergoing glaucoma surgery under local anesthesia. METHODS: In a prospective interventional case series, 12 patients with uncontrolled IOP (IOP>24 mm Hg in both the eyes) with the systemic status of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II, received IV dexmedetomidine 0.6 µg/kg 30 minutes preoperatively. The IOP of the nonsurgical eye (measured with Perkins tonometer), the heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) were recorded 5 minutes prior, 15 minutes and 2 hours after IV dexmedetomidine administration, and were compared using analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference tests. RESULTS: There were 4 women and 8 men with a mean age (±SD) of 60.6±10.4 years. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications was 4.3±1.3. The mean pre-dexmedetomidine IOP was 31.5±5.6 mm Hg. At 15 minutes post-dexmedetomidine administration, the mean and percentage drop in IOP were 10.2±3.2 mm Hg (P=0.001) and 33%±11%, respectively. The mean and percentage drop in systolic BP were 18±20 mm Hg (P=0.01) and 12%±14%, and drop in diastolic BP were 6.5±10 mm Hg (P=0.05) and 7%±11%, respectively. The mean and percentage drop in HR were 2±0.6 bpm (P=0.48) and 2%±13%, respectively. None of the subjects experienced any medication-related adverse effects. At 2 hours, the mean and percentage drop in IOP were 5.3±3 mm Hg and 17%±11%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the small sample of (ASA I-II) patients studied, preoperative dexmedetomidine produced a significant drop in IOP (33%) within 15 minutes of IV administration in patients with glaucoma that was reversing at 2 hours, with a good safety profile.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Cirurgia Filtrante , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Pressão Intraocular/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesia Local , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipertensão Ocular , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Tonometria Ocular
14.
Clin Transl Sci ; 13(6): 1279-1287, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32506659

RESUMO

Graft function is crucial for successful kidney transplantation. Many factors may affect graft function or cause delayed graft function (DGF), which decreases the prognosis for graft survival. This study was designed to evaluate whether the perioperative use of dexmedetomidine (Dex) could improve the incidence of function of graft kidney and complications after kidney transplantation. A total of 780 patients underwent kidney transplantations, 315 received intravenous Dex infusion during surgery, and 465 did not. Data were adjusted with propensity scores and multivariate logistic regression was used. The primary outcomes are major adverse complications, including DGF and acute rejection in the early post-transplantation phase. The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS), infection, overall complication, graft functional status, post-transplantation serum creatinine values, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Dex use significantly decreased DGF (19.37% vs. 23.66%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.744; 95% confidence interval, 0.564-0.981; P = 0.036), risk of infection, risk of acute rejection in the early post-transplantation phase, the risk of overall complications, and LOS. However, there were no statistical differences in 90-day graft functional status or 7-day, 30-day, and 90-day eGFR. Perioperative Dex use reduced incidence of DGF, risk of infection, risk of acute rejection, overall complications, and LOS in patients who underwent kidney transplantation.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Aloenxertos/efeitos dos fármacos , Creatinina/sangue , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/efeitos dos fármacos , Rejeição de Enxerto/diagnóstico , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Incidência , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
15.
Lancet ; 395(10241): 1938-1948, 2020 06 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32563380

RESUMO

The treatment of opioid withdrawal is an important area of clinical concern when treating patients with chronic, non-cancer pain, patients with active opioid use disorder, and patients receiving medication for opioid use disorder. Current standards of care for medically supervised withdrawal include treatment with µ-opioid receptor agonists, (eg, methadone), partial agonists (eg, buprenorphine), and α2-adrenergic receptor agonists (eg, clonidine and lofexidine). Newer agents likewise exploit these pharmacological mechanisms, including tramadol (µ-opioid receptor agonism) and tizanidine (α2 agonism). Areas for future research include managing withdrawal in the context of stabilising patients with opioid use disorder to extended-release naltrexone, transitioning patients with opioid use disorder from methadone to buprenorphine, and tapering opioids in patients with chronic, non-cancer pain.


Assuntos
Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Humanos , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/efeitos adversos
16.
Biomed Res Int ; 2020: 6130162, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32596337

RESUMO

Dexmedetomidine refers to an α 2-adrenergic receptor agonist causing potent sedative, analgesic, and minimal respiratory depression compared with alternative drugs. The present study was aimed at comparing the efficaciousness and safety of midazolam and dexmedetomidine as sedatives for dental implantation. We recruited 60 patients belonging to group I or II of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and treated them with either midazolam or dexmedetomidine in a random manner. Patients' duration of analgesia after surgery, surgeon and patient degrees of satisfaction, Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAAS) scores after drug administration, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, and vital signs were recorded variables. Patients administered dexmedetomidine had significantly lower OAAS scores than those administered midazolam (p < 0.05). Patients administrated dexmedetomidine had a significantly longer analgesia duration after the surgical procedure than those administered midazolam, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Dexmedetomidine had a significantly larger number of surgeons satisfied with the level of sedation/analgesia than midazolam (p < 0.05). Accordingly, it is considered that dexmedetomidine can achieve better postoperative analgesia, surgeon satisfaction, and sedation than midazolam.


Assuntos
Implantação Dentária/métodos , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Midazolam/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Trials ; 21(1): 582, 2020 Jun 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32591004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Perioperative ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury during liver transplantation is strongly associated with early allograft dysfunction (EAD), graft loss, and mortality. Hepatic I/R injury also causes remote damage to other organs including the renal and pulmonary systems. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist which is used as an adjuvant to general anesthesia, has been shown in preclinical studies to provide organ protection by ameliorating the effects of I/R injury in a range of tissues (including the liver). However, prospective clinical evidence of any potential benefits in improving outcomes in liver transplantation is lacking. This study aimed to verify the hypothesis that the application of dexmedetomidine during the perioperative period of liver transplantation can reduce the incidence of EAD and primary graft non-function (PNF). At the same time, the effects of dexmedetomidine application on perioperative renal function and lung function were studied. METHODS: This is a prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group study. Two hundred participants (18-65 years) scheduled to undergo liver transplantation under general anesthesia will be included in this study. For participants in the treatment group, a loading dose of DEX will be given after induction of anesthesia (1 µg/kg over 10 min) followed by a continuous infusion (0.5 µg/kg /h) until the end of surgery. For participants in the placebo group, an equal volume loading dose of 0.9% saline will be given after the induction of anesthesia followed by an equal volume continuous infusion until the end of surgery. All other supplements, e.g., opioids, sedatives, and muscle relaxant, will be identical in both arms and administered according to routine clinical practice. DISCUSSION: The present trial will examine whether DEX confers organoprotective effects in the liver, in terms of reducing the incidence of EAD and PNF in orthotopic liver transplantation recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03770130. Registered on 10 December 2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03770130.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Fígado , Período Perioperatório , Disfunção Primária do Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto , Humanos , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 20(1): 86, 2020 Mar 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32138784

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common side-effects following strabismus surgery. The present study aimed to compare the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on PONV incidence in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery. METHODS: In this prospective randomized double-blinded study, 126 pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery were randomized into one of three groups: Placebo group, normal saline; DEX1 group, 0.3 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, and DEX2 group, 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine. Oculocardiac reflex (OCR) events were recorded during surgery. PONV or postoperative vomiting (POV) was recorded for 24 h in the ward. Pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) scale and emergence agitation (EA) scale were recorded in the recovery room. RESULTS: Intraoperative OCR was significantly reduced in DEX2 group (42%) as compared to that of Placebo group (68%) (p = 0.0146). During the first 24 h post-op, the overall incidence of PONV was significantly lower in DEX2 group (10%) than that of Placebo group (32%) (p = 0.0142). There was no significant difference in POV among the three groups. PAED or EA scores among the three groups were similar during recovery time. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg) reduced OCR and PONV without lengthening extubation time or recovery time in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered before patient enrollment at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Clinical Trial Number: ChiCTR1800020176, Date: 12/19/2018).


Assuntos
Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/prevenção & controle , Estrabismo/cirurgia , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Criança , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Músculos Oculomotores/cirurgia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/etiologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reflexo Oculocardíaco/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther ; 36(4): 234-237, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32105500

RESUMO

Purpose: To evaluate the reduction of conjunctival and episcleral hyperemia and bleeding in pterygium surgery following the use of topical brimonidine preoperatively. Methods: In this study, 45 patients who had undergone pterygium surgery under topical anesthesia were enrolled. Brominidine tartrate 0.15% eye drops were applied topically to 25 eyes of 25 patients at the sixth and third minutes preoperatively, and no drops were applied to 20 eyes of 20 patients for vasoconstriction. Preoperative and postoperative photographs and video images were taken. Results: Vasoconstriction effects of topical brimonidine tartrate on surface vessels were observed. The surface area of blood vessels was reduced 60% within 5 min; this effect was observed with the help of Photoshop and ImageJ programs and it lasted for ∼20 min. The surgery lasts for 7 min, on average, so the conjunctival whitening formed by brimonidine tartrate provides a safe and comfortable operative area throughout the surgery. Conclusion: We recommend applying brimonidine tartrate before pterygium surgery due to its conjunctival whitening effect to provide a safe and comfortable operative area throughout the surgery.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/farmacologia , Tartarato de Brimonidina/farmacologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Pterígio/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Tópica , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Tartarato de Brimonidina/administração & dosagem , Tartarato de Brimonidina/uso terapêutico , Túnica Conjuntiva/efeitos dos fármacos , Túnica Conjuntiva/patologia , Feminino , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Hiperemia/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Pterígio/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esclerite/patologia , Vasoconstrição/efeitos dos fármacos , Vasoconstrição/fisiologia
20.
Inflammation ; 43(3): 833-846, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31927655

RESUMO

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether TIPE2 participates in the protective actions of dexmedetomidine (DEX) in a mouse model of sepsis-induced acute lung injury (ALI). We administered TIPE2 adeno-associated virus (AAV-TIPE2) intratracheally into the lungs of mice. Control mice were infected with an adeno-associated virus expressing no transgene. Three weeks later, an animal model of caecal ligation-perforation (CLP)-induced sepsis was established. DEX was administered intravenously 30 min after CLP. Twenty-four hours after sepsis, lung injury was assayed by lung histology, the ratio of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) to total cells in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, BALF protein content and the lung wet-to-dry (W/D) weight ratio. Proinflammatory factor levels in the BALF of mice were measured. The protein expression levels in lung tissues were analysed by Western blotting. The results showed that DEX treatment markedly mitigated sepsis-induced lung injury, which was characterized by the deterioration of histopathology, histologic scores, the W/D weight ratio and total protein levels in the BALF. Moreover, DEX markedly attenuated sepsis-induced lung inflammation, as evidenced by the decrease in the number of PMNs in the BALF, lung MPO activity and proinflammatory cytokines in the BALF. In addition, DEX dramatically prevented sepsis-induced pulmonary cell apoptosis in mice, as reflected by decreases in the number of TUNEL-positive cells, the protein expression of cleaved caspase-9 and cleaved caspase 3 and the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio. In addition, evaluation of protein expression showed that DEX blocked sepsis-activated JNK phosphorylation and NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation. Similar results were also observed in the TIPE2 overexpression group. Our study demonstrated that DEX inhibits acute inflammation and apoptosis in a murine model of sepsis-stimulated ALI via the upregulation of TIPE2 and the suppression of the activation of the NF-κB and JNK signalling pathways.


Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/metabolismo , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/prevenção & controle , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intracelular/biossíntese , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/metabolismo , Administração Intravenosa , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Animais , Técnicas de Transferência de Genes , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Distribuição Aleatória , Resultado do Tratamento , Regulação para Cima/efeitos dos fármacos , Regulação para Cima/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA