Same day discharge colon surgery: is it financially worth it?

AIM: Same day discharge (SDD) for colorectal surgery shows increasing promise in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and minimally invasive surgery. It has become increasingly relevant due to the constraints posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to compare SDD and postoperative day 1 (POD1) discharge to understand the clinical outcomes and financial impact on factors such as cost, charge, revenue, contribution margin and readmission. METHOD: A retrospective review of colectomies was performed at a single institution over a 2-year period (n = 143). Two populations were identified: SDD (n = 51) and POD1 (n = 92). Patients were selected by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10 (ICD-10) and Diagnosis Related Grouper (DRG) codes. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference favouring SDD in total hospital cost (p < 0.0001), average direct costs (p < 0.0001) and average charges (p < 0.0016). SDD average hospital costs were $8699 (values in USD throughout) compared with $11 652 for POD 1 (p < 0.0001), and average SDD hospital charges were $85 506 compared with $97 008 for POD1 (p < 0.0016). The net revenue for SDD was $22 319 while for POD1 it was $26 173 (p = 0.14). Upon comparison of contribution margins (SDD $13 620 vs. POD1 $14 522), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). There were no identified statistically significant differences in operating room time, robotic console time, readmission rates or surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Amidst the pandemic-related constraints, we found that SDD was associated with lower hospital costs and comparable contribution margins compared with POD1. Additionally, the study was unable to identify any significant difference between operating time, readmissions, and surgical complications when performing SDD.

Timing and Cost of Wound Complications After Colorectal Resection.

BACKGROUND: More than 50% of postoperative wound complications occur after discharge. They are the most common postoperative complication and the most common reason for readmission after a surgical procedure. Little is known about the long-term costs of postdischarge wound complications after surgery. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand the differences in costs and characteristics of wound complications identified after hospital discharge for patients undergoing colorectal surgery in comparison with in-hospital complications. DESIGN: This is an observational cohort study using Veterans Health Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. SETTING: This study was conducted at a Veterans Affairs medical center. SETTING: Patients undergoing colorectal resection between October 1, 2007 and September 30, 2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were adjusted costs of care at discharge, 30 days, and 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: Of 20,146 procedures, 11.9% had a wound complication within 30 days of surgery (49.2% index-hospital, 50.8% postdischarge). In comparison with patients with index-hospital complications, patients with postdischarge complications had fewer superficial infections (65.0% vs 72.2%, p < 0.01), more organ/space surgical site infections (14.3% vs 10.1%, p < 0.01), and higher rates of diabetes (29.1% vs 25.0%, p = 0.02), and they were to have had a laparoscopic approach for their surgery (24.7% vs 18.2%, p < 0.01). The average cost including surgery at 30 days was $37,315 (SD = $29,319). Compared with index-hospital wound complications, postdischarge wound complications were $9500 (22%, p < 0.001) less expensive at 30 days and $9736 (15%, p < 0.001) less expensive at 90 days. Patients with an index-hospital wound complication were 40% less likely to require readmission at 30 days, but their readmissions were $12,518 more expensive than readmissions among patients with a newly identified postdischarge wound complication (p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited to patient characteristics and costs accrued only within the Veterans Affairs system. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with postdischarge wound complications have lower 30- and 90-day postoperative costs than those with wound complications identified during their index hospitalization and almost half were managed as an outpatient. TIEMPO Y COSTO DE LAS COMPLICACIONES LA HERIDA DESPUS DE LA RESECCIN COLORRECTAL: ANTECEDENTES:Más del 50% de complicaciones postoperatorias de la herida ocurren después del alta. Es la complicación postoperatoria más común y el motivo más frecuente de reingreso después del procedimiento quirúrgico. Poco se sabe sobre los costos a largo plazo de las complicaciones de la herida después del alta quirúrgica.OBJETIVO:Intentar en comprender las diferencias en los costos y las características de las complicaciones de la herida, identificadas después del alta hospitalaria, en pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal, en comparación con las complicaciones intrahospitalarias.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte observacional utilizando datos del Programa de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica de la Administración de Salud de Veteranos.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Administración de Veteranos.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a resección colorrectal entre el 1/10/2007 y el 30/9/2014.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Costos de atención ajustados al alta, 30 días y 90 días después de la cirugía.RESULTADOS:De 20146 procedimientos, el 11,9% tuvo una complicación de la herida dentro de los 30 días de la cirugía. (49,2% índice hospitalario, 50,8% después del alta). En comparación con los pacientes, del índice de complicaciones hospitalarias, los pacientes con complicaciones posteriores al alta, tuvieron menos infecciones superficiales (65,0% frente a 72,2%, p <0,01), más infecciones de órganos/espacios quirúrgicos (14,3% frente a 10,1%, p <0,01), tasas más altas de diabetes (29,1% versus 25,0%, p = 0,02), y deberían de haber tenido un abordaje laparoscópico para su cirugía (24,7% versus 18,2%, p <0,01). El costo promedio, incluida la cirugía a los 30 días, fue de $ 37,315 (desviación estándar = $ 29,319). En comparación con el índice de complicaciones de las herida hospitalaria, las complicaciones de la herida después del alta fueron $ 9,500 (22%, p <0,001) menor costo a los 30 días y $ 9,736 (15%, p<0,001) y menor costo a los 90 días. Los pacientes con índice de complicación de la herida hospitalaria, tenían un 40% menos de probabilidades de requerir reingreso a los 30 días, pero sus reingresos eran $ 12,518 más costosos que los reingresos entre los pacientes presentando complicación de la herida recién identificada después del alta (p <0,001).LIMITACIONES:Limitado a las características del paciente y los costos acumulados solo dentro del sistema VA.CONCLUSIONES:Pacientes con complicaciones de la herida post alta, tienen menores costos postoperatorios a los 30 y 90 días, que aquellos con complicaciones de la herida identificadas durante su índice de hospitalización y aproximadamente la mitad fueron tratados de forma ambulatoria.

Race Is an Independent Predictor for Nonroutine Discharges After Spine Surgery for Spinal Intradural/Cord Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if race was an independent predictor of extended length of stay (LOS), nonroutine discharge, and increased health care costs after surgery for spinal intradural/cord tumors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2017. All adult (>18 years old) inpatients who underwent surgical intervention for a benign or malignant spinal intradural/cord tumor were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis and procedural coding systems. Patients were then categorized based on race: White, African American (AA), Hispanic, and other. Postoperative complications, LOS, discharge disposition, and total cost of hospitalization were assessed. A backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of extended LOS and nonroutine discharge disposition. RESULTS: Of 3595 patients identified, there were 2620 (72.9%) whites (W), 310 (8.6%) AAs/blacks, 275 (7.6%) Hispanic (H), and 390 (10.8%) other (O). Postoperative complication rates were similar among the cohorts (P = 0.887). AAs had longer mean (W, 5.4 ± 4.2 days vs. AA, 8.9 ± 9.5 days vs. H, 5.9 ± 3.9 days vs. O, 6.1 ± 3.9 days; P = 0.014) length of hospitalizations than the other cohorts. The overall incidence of nonroutine discharge was 55% (n = 1979), with AA race having the highest rate of nonroutine discharges (W, 53.8% vs. AA, 74.2% vs. H, 45.5% vs. O, 43.6%; P = 0.016). On multivariate regression analysis, AA race was the only significant racial independent predictor of nonroutine discharge disposition (odds ratio, 3.32; confidence interval, 1.67-6.60; P < 0.001), but not extended LOS (P = 0.209). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that AA race is an independent predictor of nonroutine discharge disposition in patients undergoing surgical intervention for a spinal intradural/cord tumor.

Understanding value and patient complexity among common inpatient vascular surgery procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgery patients are highly complex, second only to patients undergoing cardiac procedures. However, unlike cardiac surgery, work relative value units (wRVU) for vascular surgery were undervalued based on an overall patient complexity score. This study assesses the correlation of patient complexity with wRVUs for the most commonly performed inpatient vascular surgery procedures. METHODS: The 2014 to 2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data Files were queried for inpatient cases performed by vascular surgeons. A previously developed patient complexity score using perioperative domains was calculated based on patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class of ≥4, major comorbidities, emergent status, concurrent procedures, additional procedures, hospital length of stay, nonhome discharge, and 30-day major complications, readmissions, and mortality. Procedures were assigned points based on their relative rank and then an overall score was created by summing the total points. An observed to expected ratio (O/E) was calculated using open ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (rOAAA) as the referent and then applied to an adjusted median wRVU per operative minute. RESULTS: Among 164,370 cases, patient complexity was greatest for rOAAA (complexity score = 128) and the least for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) (complexity score = 29). Patients undergoing rOAAA repair had the greatest proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists class of ≥IV (84.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 82.6%-86.8%), highest mortality (35.5%; 95% CI, 32.8%-38.3%), and major complication rate (87.1%; 95% CI, 85.1%-89.0%). Patients undergoing CEA had the lowest mortality (0.7%; 95% CI, 0.7%-0.8%), major complication rate (8.2%; 95% 95% CI, 8.0%-8.5%), and shortest length of stay (2.7 days; 95% CI, 2.7-2.7). The median wRVU ranged from 10.0 to 42.1 and only weakly correlated with overall complexity (Spearman's ρ = 0.11; P < .01). The median wRVU per operative minute was greatest for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (0.25) and lowest for both axillary-femoral artery bypass (0.12) and open femoral endarterectomy, thromboembolectomy, or reconstruction (0.12). After adjusting for patient complexity, CEA (O/E = 3.8) and transcarotid artery revascularization (O/E = 2.8) had greater than expected O/E. In contrast, lower extremity bypass (O/E = 0.77), lower extremity embolectomy (O/E = 0.79), and open abdominal aortic repair (O/E = 0.80) had a lower than expected O/E. CONCLUSIONS: Patient complexity varies substantially across vascular procedures and is not captured effectively by wRVUs. Increased operative time for open procedures is not adequately accounted for by wRVUs, which may unfairly penalize surgeons who perform complex open operations.

A policy of day-case sinonasal surgery is safe, well tolerated and cost-effective.

OBJECTIVE: Practices vary regarding the timing of discharge after sinonasal surgery. This study aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of same-day discharge compared to next-day discharge after sinonasal surgery. METHODS: A retrospective single-surgeon audit of sinonasal surgery over a 12-month period was performed. Demographic and clinical details, including distance travelled home, timing of discharge, hospital re-presentation, and complications, were collected and compared between the same-day discharge and next-day discharge groups. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were identified; 117 underwent day-case surgery, of which 6 re-presented to the emergency department. Sixty-four patients stayed overnight after surgery, and six of those patients re-presented to the emergency department. The per patient cost was $3262 for day-case sinonasal surgery and $5050 for those admitted overnight after surgery (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Routine same-day discharge after sinonasal surgery is achievable, safe and cost-effective.

The Effect of Patient and Hospital Characteristics on Total Costs of Peripheral Bypass in New York State.

INTRODUCTION: With the aging U.S. population, peripheral vascular procedures will become increasingly common. The objective of this study is to characterize the factors associated with increased total costs after peripheral bypass surgery. METHODS: Data for 34,819 patients undergoing peripheral bypass surgery in NY State were extracted using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database for years 2009-2017. Patient demographics, All Patient Refined Diagnostic Related Groups (APR) severity score, mortality risk, hospital volume, and length of stay data were collected. Primary outcomes were total costs and length of stay. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 28.1% of peripheral bypass surgeries were performed in New York City. 7.9% of patients had extreme APR severity of illness whereas 32.0% had major APR severity of illness. 6.3% of patients had extreme risk of mortality and 1 in every 5 patients (20%) had major risk of mortality. 24.9% of patients were discharged to a facility. The mean length of stay (LOS) was 9.9 days. Patient LOS of 6-11 days was associated with +$2,791.76 total costs. Mean LOS of ≥ 12 days was associated with + $27,194.88 total costs. Multivariate analysis revealed risk factors associated with an admission listed in the fourth quartile of total costs (≥$36,694.44) for peripheral bypass surgery included NYC location (2.82, CI 2.62-3.04), emergency surgery (1.12, CI 1.03-1.22), extreme APR 2.08, 1.78-2.43, extreme risk of mortality (2.73, 2.34-3.19), emergency room visit (1.68, 1.57-1.81), discharge to a facility (1.27, CI 1.15-1.41), and LOS in the third or fourth quartile (11.09, 9.87-12.46). CONCLUSION: The cost of peripheral bypass surgery in New York State is influenced by a variety of factors including LOS, patient comorbidity and disease severity, an ER admission, and discharge to a facility.

Factors Complicating Discharge to Home following Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Single Institution Initiative.

Recently, with the Medicare bundled payments initiative for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there has been a move by many institutions to further streamline costs associated with the entire operative and perioperative process. One of these cost-saving strategies has been to favor discharging patients to home with outpatient services as opposed to discharging to the relatively more expensive rehabilitation facilities. Our aim was to determine the success of a teaching institute's initiative in discharging patients to home instead of a rehabilitation facility. Specifically, we evaluated if there were differences in discharge disposition based off of (1) surgeon/patient preference, (2) length of stay, (3) demographics, and (4) postoperative complications. A retrospective review of all patients who had a TKA from 2015 to 2017 at a single teaching institution was performed and assessed discharge to home or to a rehabilitation facility. If they were not discharged to home, we evaluated why that did not happen, stratified the reason they were discharged to a rehabilitation facility into four groups based on (1) physician and occupational health team assessment, (2) patient preference, (3) physician preference, and (4) family or caretaker preference. A total of 229 patients were enrolled in this initiative, with 107 patients (47%) discharged to home with outpatient physical therapy services and 122 (53%) discharged to a rehabilitation facility. Of these, 35 patients (29%) went to these facilities because of physician and occupational health team assessment. However, 31 (25%) patients were due to patient preference, 32 (26%) were because of surgeon's preference, and 24 (20%) were not discharged to home because of family or caretaker preference. There were no differences in length of stay, gender, or complication rates between cohorts. Many patients can be safely discharged to home following TKA at a community teaching institution; however, there continues to be a strong prejudice by patients, physicians, and caretakers to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility despite the home discharge initiative.

Drivers of variation in 90-day episode payments after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Although mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke from a large vessel occlusion is now the standard of care, little is known about cost variations in stroke patients following thrombectomy and factors that influence these variations. METHODS: We evaluated claims data for 2016 to 2018 for thrombectomy-performing hospitals within Michigan through a registry that includes detailed episode payment information for both Medicare and privately insured patients. We aimed to analyze price-standardized and risk-adjusted 90-day episode payments in patients who underwent thrombectomy. Hospitals were grouped into three payment terciles for comparison. Statistical analysis was carried out using unpaired t-test, Chi-square, and ANOVA tests. RESULTS: 1076 thrombectomy cases treated at 16 centers were analyzed. The average 90-day episode payment by hospital ranged from $53 046 to $81,767, with a mean of $65 357. A $20 467 difference (35.1%) existed between the high and low payment hospital terciles (P<0.0001), highlighting a significant payment variation across hospital terciles. The primary drivers of payment variation were related to post-discharge care which accounted for 38% of the payment variation (P=0.0058, inter-tercile range $11,977-$19,703) and readmissions accounting for 26% (P=0.016, inter-tercile range $3,315-$7,992). This was followed by professional payments representing 20% of the variation (P<0.0001, inter-tercile range $7525-$9,922), while index hospitalization payment was responsible for only 16% of the 90-day episode payment variation (P=0.10, inter-tercile range $35,432-$41,099). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variation in 90-day episode payments for patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy across centers. The main drivers of payment variation are related to differences in post-discharge care and readmissions.

Adverse Events and Bundled Costs after Cranial Neurosurgical Procedures: Validation of the LACE Index Across 40,431 Admissions and Development of the LACE-Cranial Index.

OBJECTIVE: Anticipating postdischarge complications after neurosurgery remains difficult. The LACE index, based on 4 hospitalization descriptors, stratifies patients by risk of 30-day postdischarge adverse events but has not been validated in a procedure-specific manner in neurosurgery. Our study sought to explore the usefulness of the LACE index in a population undergoing cranial neurosurgery and to develop an enhanced model, LACE-Cranial. METHODS: The OptumClinformatics Database was used to identify cranial neurosurgery admissions (2004-2017). Procedures were grouped as trauma/hematoma/intracranial pressure, open vascular, functional/pain, skull base, tumor, or endovascular. Adverse events were defined as postdischarge death/readmission. LACE-Cranial was developed using a logistic regression framework incorporating an expanded feature set in addition to the original LACE components. RESULTS: A total of 40,431 admissions were included. Predictions of 30-day readmissions was best for skull base (area under the curve [AUC], 0.636) and tumor (AUC, 0.63) admissions but was generally poor. Predictive ability of 30-day mortality was best for functional/pain admissions (AUC, 0.957) and poorest for trauma/hematoma/intracranial pressure admissions (AUC, 0.613). Across procedure types except for functional/pain, a high-risk LACE score was associated with higher postdischarge bundled payment costs. Incorporating features identified to contribute independent predictive value, the LACE-Cranial model achieved procedure-specific 30-day mortality AUCs ranging from 0.904 to 0.98. Prediction of 30-day and 90-day readmissions was also improved, with tumor and skull base cases achieving 90-day readmission AUCs of 0.718 and 0.717, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the unmodified LACE index shows inconsistent classification performance, the enhanced LACE-Cranial model offers excellent prediction of short-term postdischarge mortality across procedure groups and significantly improved anticipation of short-term postdischarge readmissions.

What Are the Cost Drivers for the Major Bowel Bundled Payment Care Improvement Initiative?

BACKGROUND: The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative links payments for service beneficiaries during an episode of care (limited to 90 days from index surgery discharge). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify drivers of costs/payments for the major bowel Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative. DESIGN: Discharges from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files of hospitals participating in the major bowel bundle of the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative were analyzed. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at 4 tertiary care centers. PATIENTS: All patients in diagnostic related groups of 329, 330, or 331 treated at eligible facilities between September 1, 2012, and September 30, 2014, were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We calculated all costs/payments for the bundled period, that is, 3 days before surgery, the index hospitalization including surgery, and the 90-day postoperative period. We then determined costs for laparoscopic versus open procedures using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure codes for each of the diagnostic related groups, as well as in aggregate. Last, we calculated differential impact of cost drivers on overall total episode costs. RESULTS: In the cohort of hospitals participating in the major bowel Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative, open procedures ($45,073) cost 1.6 times more than laparoscopic. For the lowest complexity diagnostic related group (331), performance of the procedure with open techniques was the largest total episode cost driver, because use of postdischarge services remained low. In the highest complexity diagnostic related group (329), readmission costs, skilled nursing facilities costs, and home health services costs were the greatest cost drivers after hospital services. LIMITATIONS: The analyses are limited by the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that efforts to safely perform open procedures with laparoscopic techniques would be most effective in reducing costs for lower complexity diagnostic related groups, whereas efforts to impact readmission and postdischarge service use would be most impactful for the higher complexity diagnostic related groups. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B420. ¿CUÁLES SON LOS FACTORES DETERMINANTES DE LOS COSTOS DE LA INICIATIVA DE MEJORA DE LA ATENCIÓN DE PAGOS COMBINADOS PARA EL INTESTINO MAYOR?: La iniciativa de pagos combinados para la mejora de la atención (BPCI) vincula los pagos para los beneficiarios del servicio durante un episodio de atención (limitado a 90 días desde el alta hospitalaria de la cirugía índice).Identificar los factores determinantes de los costos / pagos de la iniciativa BPCI intestinal mayor.Análisis de altas de los Archivos Analíticos Estándar de Medicare de los hospitales que participan en el paquete intestinal principal de la iniciativa BPCI.Todos los pacientes en Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico (GRD) de 329, 330 o 331 tratados en instalaciones elegibles desde el 1 de Septiembre de 2012 hasta el 30 de Septiembre de 2014.Calculamos todos los costos / pagos para el período combinado, es decir, tres días antes de la cirugía, el índice de hospitalización incluida la cirugía y el período posoperatorio de 90 días. Luego, determinamos los costos de los procedimientos laparoscópicos versus abiertos utilizando códigos de procedimiento ICD-9 para cada uno de los GRD, así como en conjunto. Por último, calculamos el impacto diferencial de los generadores de costos sobre los costos totales del episodio.En la cohorte de hospitales que participan en la iniciativa BPCI del intestino principal, los procedimientos abiertos ($ 45.073) cuestan 1,6 veces más que los laparoscópicos. Para el GRD de menor complejidad (331), la realización del procedimiento con técnicas abiertas fue el mayor factor de costo total del episodio, ya que la utilización de los servicios posteriores al alta se mantuvo baja. En el GRD de mayor complejidad (329), los costos de readmisión, los costos de las instalaciones de enfermería especializada y los costos de los servicios de salud en el hogar fueron los mayores factores de costo después de los servicios hospitalarios.Los análisis están limitados por la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio.Estos resultados indican que los esfuerzos para realizar procedimientos abiertos de manera segura con técnicas laparoscópicas serían más efectivos para reducir los costos de los GRD de menor complejidad, mientras que los esfuerzos para impactar la readmisión y la utilización del servicio posterior al alta serían más impactantes para los GRD de mayor complejidad. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B420.

Reallocating Cancer Surgery Payments for Alternate Level of Care in Ontario: What Are the Options?

This article examines how alternate-level-of-care (ALC) days are funded through the cancer surgery funding model in Ontario and evaluates policy options to better address ALC days. The contribution of ALC days to hospital funding and the impact of removing or reallocating this funding from cancer surgery is measured. Though costs associated with ALC days in cancer surgery are low, this article highlights the need for policy options that would realign funding across the healthcare system in Ontario to better meet the needs of patients waiting for ALC, reduce pressure on inpatient bed capacity and improve value for money.

Characteristics and related factors of emergency department visits, readmission, and hospital transfers of inpatients under a DRG-based payment system: A nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Taiwan has implemented the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) since 2010, and the quality of care under the DRG-Based Payment System is concerned. This study aimed to examine the characteristics, related factors, and time distribution of emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, and hospital transfers of inpatients under the DRG-Based Payment System for each Major Diagnostic Category (MDC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2012 to 2013 in Taiwan. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to examine the factors related to ED visits, readmissions, and hospital transfers of patients under the DRG-Based Payment System. RESULTS: In this study, 103,779 inpatients were under the DRG-Based Payment System. Among these inpatients, 4.66% visited the ED within 14 days after their discharge. The factors associated with the increased risk of ED visits within 14 days included age, lower monthly salary, urbanization of residence area, comorbidity index, MDCs, and hospital ownership (p < 0.05). In terms of MDCs, Diseases and Disorders of the Kidney and Urinary Tract (MDC11) conferred the highest risk of ED visits within 14 days (OR = 4.95, 95% CI: 2.69-9.10). Of the inpatients, 6.97% were readmitted within 30 days. The factors associated with the increased risk of readmission included gender, age, lower monthly salary, comorbidity index, MDCs, and hospital ownership (p < 0.05). In terms of MDCs, the inpatients with Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Puerperium (MDC14) had the highest risk of readmission within 30 days (OR = 20.43, 95% CI: 13.32-31.34). Among the inpatients readmitted within 30 days, 75.05% of them were readmitted within 14 days. Only 0.16% of the inpatients were transferred to other hospitals. CONCLUSION: The study shows a significant correlation between Major Diagnostic Categories in surgery and ED visits, readmission, and hospital transfers. The results suggested that the main reasons for the high risk may need further investigation for MDCs in ED visits, readmissions, and hospital transfers.

Safety and costs analysis of early hospital discharge after brain tumour surgery: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: A daily algorithm for hospital discharge (DAHD) is a key point in the concept of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. We aimed to evaluate the length of stay (LOS), rate of complications, and hospital costs variances after the introduction of the DAHD compared to the traditional postoperative management of brain tumour patients. METHODS: This is a cohort study with partial retrospective data collection. All consecutive patients who underwent brain tumour resection in 2017 were analysed. Demographics and procedure-related variables, as well as clinical outcomes, LOS and healthcare costs within 30 days after surgery were compared in patients before/pre-implementation and after/post-implementation the DAHD, which included: stable neurological examination; oral feeding without aspiration risk; pain control with oral medications; no intravenous medications. The algorithm was applied every morning and discharge was considered from day 1 after surgery if criteria was fulfilled. The primary outcome (LOS after surgery) analysis was adjusted for the preoperative performance status on a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were studied (pre-implementation 32, post-implementation 29). The baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. After the DAHD implementation, LOS decreased significantly (median 5 versus 3 days; p = 0.001) and the proportion of patients who were discharged on day 1 or 2 after surgery increased (44.8% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001). Major and minor complications rates, readmission rate, and unplanned return to hospital in 30-day follow-up were comparable between the groups. There was a significant reduction in the median costs of hospitalization in DAHD group (US$2135 vs US$2765, p = 0.043), mainly due to a reduction in median ward costs (US$922 vs US$1623, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge after brain tumour surgery appears to be safe and inexpensive. The LOS and hospitalization costs were reduced without increasing readmission rate or postoperative complications.

Effects of pharmacist intervention on polypharmacy in patients with type 2 diabetes in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Investigation of polypharmacy in patients with type 2 diabetes revealed that medications administered according to the patient's symptoms and complaints strongly contributed to polypharmacy. We explored the effects of clinical ward pharmacy service, which evaluated the need for symptomatic treatment, therefore minimizing polypharmacy by reducing inappropriate medications. RESULTS: The number of drugs (hospitalization vs. discharge: 9 [1-17] vs. 7 [1-16], P < 0.001) and rate of polypharmacy (hospitalization vs. discharge: 75.4% vs. 61.1%, P < 0.001) were significantly lower at discharge. Since hospital admission, the number of drugs increased (n = 6, 11%), remained unchanged (n = 15, 28%), decreased by 1 drug (n = 4, 8%), decreased by 2 drugs (n = 3, 6%), and decreased by more than 2 drugs (n = 25, 47%). Daily drug costs were significantly reduced (hospitalization vs. discharge: $8.3 vs. $6.1, P < 0.001).

Análisis con GRD: El egreso hospitalario indiferenciado de la maternidad no representa la complejidad de las pacientes con alto riesgo obstétrico / DRG analysis: undifferentiated hospital discharges of maternity does not represent the complexity of patients with high obstetric risk

INTRODUCCIÓN: La gestión actual de camas hospitalarias sigue un modelo de indiferenciación en el que existen camas quirúrgicas, médicas y de pacientes críticos. Las maternidades si bien no siguen este modelo, tienen egresos indiferenciados con pacientes que pueden egresar post parto o aún embarazadas (con patologías perinatales). OBJETIVO: Evaluar diferencias entre egresos con parto normal y aquellos con patologías de alto riesgo obstétrico (ARO) respecto a estancia media (EM) y el consumo de recursos cuantificado con el peso medio de los grupos relacionados con el diagnóstico (PMGRD). MÉTODO: Estudio transversal con egresos maternales periodo 2017-2018. Se usó Categoría Diagnóstica Mayor (CIE - 10) para definir dos grupos de egreso: 1. Con parto normal a término o 2. Con patología ARO. Se compararon 1.658 y 1.669 egresos del grupo 1 y 2 respectivamente. Las variables de resultado son EM y PMGRD. Se compararon variables cuantitativas con t de student y Kruskal Wallis. Se usó Odds Ratio con respectivo intervalo de confianza para evaluar asociación entre variables y regresión logística multivariada para ajustar asociación. RESULTADOS: La edad, proporción de gestantes tardías, EM y PMGRD fue mayor en los egresos ARO (p<0,05). Existe fuerte asociación de EM prolongada (>4 días) y PMGRD elevado (>0.3109) con los egresos ARO (ORa=3.75; IC95%=3.21-4.39 y ORa=1.28; IC95%=1.1-1.49 respectivamente). CONCLUSIONES: Es necesario diferenciar los egresos del servicio de maternidad porque los egresos de ARO muestran mayor complejidad. La evaluación del riesgo usando EM y PMGRD permite analizar con especificidad los egresos maternales para una mejor gestión de camas y del recurso humano.

INTRODUCTION: The current management of hospital beds in Chile follows an undifferentiation model in which there are surgical, medical and critical patient bed. Maternity hospitals although they do not follow this model, have undifferentiated discharges with patients who may leave poatpartum or still pregnant (with perinatal pathologies) OBJECTIVE: To assess differences between discharges with normal delivery and those with high obstetric risk pathologies (HOR) with respect to mean stay (MS) and the resource spending quantified with the average weight of the diagnosis related group (AWDRG). METHOD: Cross-sectional study with maternal discharges between 2017-2018 period. Major Diagnostic Category (ICD - 10) was used to define two discharge groups: 1. With normal term birth or 2. With HOR pathology. 1,658 and 1,669 egress from group 1 and 2 were compared respectively. The outcome variables are EM and AWDRG. Quantitative variables were compared with student t and Kruskal Wallis. Odds Ratio and respective confidence interval were used to evaluate association between variables and multivariate logistic regression to adjust association. RESULTS: Age, proportion of late pregnant women, MS and AWDRG was higher in HOR discharges (p <0.05). There is a strong association of prolonged MS (> 4 days) and elevated AWDRG (> 0.3109) with HOR discharges (ORa = 3.75; 95% CI 3.21-4.39 and ORa = 1.28; 95% CI 1.1-1.49 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to differentiate medical discharge of the maternity service because the HOR egress show greater complexity. The risk assessment using MS and AWDRG allows to analyze with specificity the maternal discharge for a better management of beds and human resources.

Socioeconomic Status and Days Alive and Out of Hospital after Major Elective Noncardiac Surgery: A Population-based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status is an important but understudied determinant of preoperative health status and postoperative outcomes. Previous work has focused on the impact of socioeconomic status on mortality, hospital stay, or complications. However, individuals with low socioeconomic status are also likely to have fewer supports to facilitate them remaining at home after hospital discharge. Thus, such patients may be less likely to return home over the short and intermediate term after major surgery. The newly validated outcome, days alive and out of hospital, may be highly suited to evaluating the impact of socioeconomic status on this postdischarge period. The study aimed to determine the association of socioeconomic status with short and intermediate term postoperative recovery as measured by days alive and out of hospital. METHODS: The authors evaluated data from 724,459 adult patients who had one of 13 elective major noncardiac surgical procedures between 2006 and 2017. Socioeconomic status was measured by median neighborhood household income (categorized into quintiles). Primary outcome was days alive and out of hospital at 30 days, while secondary outcomes included days alive and out of hospital at 90 and 180 days, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Compared to the highest income quintile, individuals in the lowest quintile had higher unadjusted risks of postoperative complications (6,049 of 121,099 [5%] vs. 6,216 of 160,495 [3.9%]) and 30-day mortality (731 of 121,099 [0.6%] vs. 701 of 160,495 [0.4%]) and longer mean postoperative length of stay (4.9 vs. 4.4 days). From lowest to highest income quintile, the mean adjusted days alive and out of hospital at 30 days after surgery varied between 24.5 to 24.9 days. CONCLUSIONS: Low socioeconomic status is associated with fewer days alive and out of hospital after surgery. Further research is needed to examine the underlying mechanisms and develop posthospital interventions to improve postoperative recovery in patients with fewer socioeconomic resources.

Black Race as a Social Determinant of Health and Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Multistate Analysis, 2007 to 2014.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patient hospitalization and discharge records. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between race and inpatient postoperative complications following lumbar spinal fusion surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Racial disparities in healthcare have been demonstrated across a range of surgical procedures. Previous research has identified race as a social determinant of health that impacts outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. However, these studies are limited in that they are outdated, contain data from a single institution, analyze small limited samples, and report limited outcomes. Our study aims to expand and update the literature examining the association between race and inpatient postoperative complications following lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: We analyzed 267,976 patient discharge records for inpatient lumbar spine surgery using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Databases for California, Florida, New York, Maryland, and Kentucky from 2007 through 2014. We used unadjusted bivariate analysis, adjusted multivariable, and stratified analysis to compare patient demographics, present-on-admission comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and complications by categories of race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Black patients were 8% and 14% more likely than white patients to experience spine surgery specific complications (adjusted odds ratios [aOR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.13) and general postoperative complications (aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07-1.20), respectively. Black patients, compared with white patients, also had increased adjusted odds of 30-day readmissions (aOR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.07-1.20), 90-day readmissions (aOR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), longer length of stay (LOS) (adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.14-1.16), and higher total charges (adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.07-1.09). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that black patients, as compared with white patients, are more likely to have postoperative complications, longer postoperative lengths of stay, higher total hospital charges, and increased odds of 30- and 90-day readmissions following lumbar spinal fusion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Can We Justify It? Trends in the Utilization of Spinal Fusions and Associated Reimbursement.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have suggested an increasing rate of utilization of spinal fusions, but contemporary data have not been analyzed, and there has been little investigation of putative drivers of increased utilization. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there is an ongoing trend of increased utilization of spinal fusions in recent data, and if there may be associations with an increasing proportion of elderly in the population, changing patterns of payer-types, and changing reimbursement rates. METHODS: We analyze 7.1 million cases from the National Inpatient Sample between 1998 and 2014. We measure annual utilization per 100 000 persons and conduct trend analyses with subgroup analysis of the senior (65 + ) population. Spine surgery utilization is compared with nonspine surgical procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting, hernia repair, hip, and knee replacement). We assess trends in charges, payer type, Medicare reimbursement rates, and hospital type. RESULTS: There was an 88% increase in the utilization rate of spinal fusion procedures from 1998 to 2014 (from 74 to 139 cases per 100 000 persons) with a significant upward trend (P < .001) that persisted in the 65 + subgroup (P < .001). An increasing proportion of spinal fusions is paid for by public payers, but per-procedure reimbursement for spinal fusions by Medicare has decreased recently (5% reduction from 2014 to 2016). CONCLUSION: Utilization of spinal fusions continues to increase and is not explained by increased proportion of elderly in the population, increased utilization of surgeries across specialties, or increased Medicare reimbursement. In fact, increased utilization of spinal fusions temporally correlated with decreasing per-procedure Medicare reimbursement.

Simulating Episode-Based Bundled Payments for Cranial Neurosurgical Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Episode-based bundled payments were introduced by Medicare in 2013 as the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) in order to improve care coordination and cost efficiency. BPCI has not yet been applied to cranial neurosurgical procedures. OBJECTIVE: To determine projected values of episode-based bundled payments when applied to common cranial neurosurgical procedures using retrospective data from a large database. METHODS: We performed a large retrospective observational study using the MarketScan administrative database to project bundled payment payments for 4 groups of common cranial neurosurgical procedures. RESULTS: We identified 15 276 procedures that met our inclusion criteria. We observed significant variability between groups, with 90-d bundle projected payments ranging from $ 58,200 for craniotomy for meningioma to $ 102,073 for craniotomy for malignant glioma. We also found significant variability in projected bundled payments within each class of operation. On average, payment for the index hospitalization accounted for 85% of projected payments for a 30-d bundle and 70.5% of projected payments for a 90-d bundle. Multivariable analysis showed that hospital readmission, discharge to postacute care facilities, venous-thrombo-embolism, medical comorbidities, adjuvant therapies, and payer status significantly contributed to projected cranial bundle payments. CONCLUSION: For the first time, to our knowledge, we project the values of episode-based bundled payments for common vascular and tumor cranial operations. As previously identified in orthopedic procedures, there is significant variability in total bundle payments within each cranial procedure. Compared to spine and orthopedic procedures, postdischarge care significantly impacts total bundle payments in cranial neurosurgery.

Day of the Week of Surgery Affects Time to Discharge for Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Unnecessary delays in discharge are extraordinarily common in the current US health care system. These delays are even more protracted for patients undergoing orthopedic procedures. A traditional hospital staffing model is heavily weighted toward increased resources on weekdays and minimal coverage on the weekend. This study examined the effect of this traditional staffing model on time to discharge for patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Patients undergoing surgery later in the week had a significantly longer hospital stay compared with patients undergoing surgery early in the week (5.5 days vs 4.9 days, respectively; P=.003). This discrepancy resulted in a mean cost increase of $7749.50 for patients undergoing surgery later in the week. A subsequent quality, safety, value initiative (QSVI) was undertaken to balance physical therapy resources alone. Following the QSVI, patients undergoing surgery later in the week had a decreased mean length of stay of 3.78 days (P=.002). Patients undergoing fusion early in the week also had a decreased mean length of stay of 3.66 days (P<.001). There was no longer a significant difference in length of stay between the "early" and the "late" groups (P=.84). This study demonstrates that simply having surgery later in the week in a hospital with a traditional staffing model adversely affects the timing of discharge, resulting in a significantly longer and more costly hospital course. By increasing physical therapy availability on the weekend, the length of stay and the cost of hospitalization decrease precipitously for these patients. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(1);8-12.].