Traumatic lower extremity amputation as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate whether lower extremity (LE) amputation among civilian casualties is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism. METHODS: All patients with severe LE injuries (AIS ≥3) derived from the ACS-TQIP (2013-2020) were divided into those who underwent trauma-associated amputation and those with limb salvage. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias and confounding and compare the rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). RESULTS: A total of 145,667 patients with severe LE injuries were included, with 3443 patients requiring LE amputation. After successful matching, patients sustaining LE amputation still experienced significantly higher rates of PE (4.2% vs. 2.5%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and DVT (6.5% vs. 3.4%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). A sensitivity analysis examining patients with isolated major LE trauma similarly showed a higher rate of thromboembolic complications, including higher incidences of PE (3.2% vs. 2.0%, p â€‹= â€‹0.015) and DVT (4.7% vs. 2.6%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide analysis, traumatic lower extremity amputation is associated with a significantly higher risk of VTE events, including PE and DVT.

Heterotopic Ossification Formation in Military Beneficiaries Following Hip- and Pelvic-Level Amputations.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic hip and pelvic level amputations are uncommon but devastating injuries and associated with numerous complications that can significantly affect quality of life for these patients. While heterotopic ossification (HO) formation has been reported at rates of up to 90% following traumatic, combat-related amputations, previous studies included few patients with more proximal hip and pelvic level amputations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the Military Health System medical record and identified patients with both traumatic and disease-related hip- and pelvic-level amputations performed between 2001 and 2017. We reviewed the most recent pelvis radiograph at least 3 months following amputation to determine bony resection level and the association between HO formation and reason for amputation (trauma versus disease related). RESULTS: Of 93 patients with post-amputation pelvis radiographs available, 66% (n = 61) had hip-level amputations and 34% (n = 32) had a hemipelvectomy. The median duration from the initial injury or surgery to the most recent radiograph was 393 days (interquartile range, 73-1,094). HO occurred in 75% of patients. Amputation secondary to trauma was a significant predictor of HO formation (χ2 = 24.58; P < .0001); however, there was no apparent relationship between the severity of HO and traumatic versus non-traumatic etiology (χ2 = 2.92; P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: Amputations at the hip were more common than pelvic-level amputations in this study population, and three-fourths of hip- and pelvic-level amputation patients had radiographic evidence of HO. The rate of HO formation following blast injuries and other trauma was significantly higher compared with patients with non-traumatic amputations.

Can a Blade-Stopping Mechanism on Circular Table Saws Reduce the Severity of Hand Injuries in Contact Scenarios? A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: Table saws are commonly used woodworking tools that carry a substantial risk of injury. Blade-stopping technology has been developed and has the potential to reduce the frequency and severity of injury. This study aimed to evaluate this technology on human tissue and characterize the resulting injuries. METHODS: Twenty-seven fresh, frozen cadaveric specimen hands were used. Three scenarios were tested, with the specimen (1) moving forward ("forward"); (2) moving backward, such as in a kickback scenario ("reverse"); and (3) dropped from above the saw blade ("top"). Each scenario was tested at both slow (0.001 m/sec) and fast (forward: 0.6 m/sec; reverse: 0.5 m/sec; top: 2.4 m/sec) approach speeds. The severity of the injuries was characterized by anatomic evaluation and confirmed with radiographic evaluation. Injuries were classified as no laceration, superficial soft tissue injury, deep soft tissue injury, and bony injury. RESULTS: For the slow approach speed, the brake cartridge engaged in 100% of the trials for all 3 scenarios, and 100% of the specimens sustained no injuries. Forward testing at a fast approach speed revealed the brake cartridge engaged in 89% of the trials (injuries: 4 superficial, 2 deep, 3 bony). Reverse testing at a fast approach speed revealed the brake cartridge engaged in 11% of trials (injuries: 1 superficial, 8 bony). Top testing at a fast approach speed revealed the brake cartridge engaged in 89% of the trials (injuries: 9 bony). CONCLUSIONS: Modern blade-stopping technology did not prevent all traumatic hand injuries in fast approach speed scenarios, but it reduced the incidence and severity of injuries. The technology was more effective at low approach speed scenarios. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study provide information to help understand the factors that can prevent or reduce the severity of contact injuries (hand, finger, or thumb) for operators of table saws.

The Roles of Injury Type, Injury Level and Amputation Type in the Need for Revision Surgery after Replantation: Retrospective Clinical Outcome with 296 Finger Replantation.

BACKGROUND: With the development of microsurgical techniques, the replantation survival rate has increased, but in some cases, revision surgery is required. Although there are many studies on replantation survival rate, studies on revision surgery are limited. In this study, we evaluated replantation patients requiring revision surgery in terms of amputation level, injury type, and amputation type (single-multiple). METHODS: This is a retrospective study.Two hundred fifty-six patients (296 fingers) who were operated on for total finger amputation in our hospital between 2013 and 2018 were included in the study. In the postoperative period, revision surgery was required for 24 fingers due to vascular insufficiency. Patients were evaluated in terms of amputation level, injury type, and amputation type. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-four fingers were saved after primary surgery. Eight fingers failed before they could undergo revision surgery. Revision surgery was performed for 24 fingers. After revision surgery, 19 fingers were saved, and five fingers were failed. There was no significant effect of gender and age in terms of revision (p > 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in injury level and injury type, but there was a statistically significant difference in terms of amputation type (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite advanced microsurgery and experience, vascular insufficiency can be observed after replantation. Surgical re-exploration is necessary for salvage.

Fingertip injury epidemiology: an Indian perspective.

Fingertip injuries result in significant morbidity. It is associated with pain, loss of work and recreational hours, financial burden, and distortion of body image. Although it is a common injury, the epidemiology of fingertip injury is a subject with scanty literature. This study is aimed at providing epidemiology of fingertip injury in India. Epidemiological data were collected and analysed through a retrospective review of all fingertip injuries over a period of four years treated in our department. In the paediatric population, among the 241 injuries in 221children, most occurred at home (98%). Most incidents were in children under five years of age (74%). The most commonly involved digit is the middle finger (29%) and door crush was the commonest reason (80%). Incomplete fingertip amputation with nail bed injury was seen in 80% of cases. In adults, there were 351 injuries in 290 patients, most of which occurred by jamming of the finger at a two-wheeler chain (22.5%). The second most common cause is cut by machine and associated with heavy machinery (17.6%). Complete amputation at the nailbed level was seen in 50% of the cases. Both children and adults need to be educated regarding the causation and effects of fingertip injuries. Damage to fingers can be prevented and reduced by observing safety measures both inside the home and at the workplace.

Epidemiology of Upper-Extremity Amputations Using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System.

BACKGROUND: Upper-extremity amputations can be devastating injuries that lead to lifelong disabilities. The purpose of our study was to review national data and identify populations at risk and injury patterns that could be targeted with prevention strategies. METHODS: Data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System between years 2012 and 2018 were reviewed. Injuries affecting the upper extremity resulting in amputation were included. Patient demographics, anatomical location, mechanism of injury, level of care provided, and setting of injury were recorded. Descriptive was recorded and tabulated for each category. RESULTS: There were 4,766 patients identified with amputations to the upper extremity from 2012 to 2018. The following categories are listed below: age in years, sex, race, anatomical location of injury, most common mechanisms of injury, disposition of patient, environmental location. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that male children younger than 10 years are at the high risk for finger amputations. In addition, the majority of these injuries occur in the home. This suggests that safety prevention in the home is a significant area in need of improvement. We recommend further research in areas of home safety and injury prevention to decrease the risk of the devastating injuries.

Seasonal Trends in Traumatic Digit Amputations: Experience of a Level І and a Level ІІ Hospital in a Northeastern State.

Background: Traumatic digit amputations are common hand injuries in the United States. The primary aim of our study was to describe the relationship between season and mechanisms of amputation. Methods: The Emergency Department and Orthopaedic Surgery Billing Department databases of our level І institution in the Northeast were reviewed to identify patients with a traumatic digit amputation between January 2010 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria were defined as any patient presenting with a partial or complete amputation through Verdan zone I or II. All patient information was entered into a secure database, including date of injury, demographic information, digits amputated, mechanism of injury (crush, laceration, avulsion, bite, blast, saw, snow blower, or lawn mower), and Verdan zones of amputation. In addition to descriptive statistics, Fisher exact and χ2 tests were used to compare the incidence of these traumatic digit amputation mechanisms between seasons. Results: For this 6-year period, an average of 24 patients presented each season for treatment of a traumatic digit amputation. Of all seasons, spring had the highest proportion of lawn mower amputations (62.5%; P < .0001), summer had the highest proportion of blast amputations (75.0%; P = .011), and winter had the highest proportion of snow blower amputations (90.9%; P < .0001). All other traumatic digit amputation mechanisms had no significant seasonal variation in incidence (P > .30). Conclusions: Given that certain traumatic digit amputation mechanisms occur predictably during certain seasons, seasonal public education has the potential to prevent these debilitating injuries.

Traumatic upper-limb amputation: The process toward acceptance.

INTRODUCTION: After traumatic upper-limb amputation (TULA), one-third of patients develop traumatic pathological grief (PG). However, are the other two-thirds unscathed? The main aim of the present study was to assess the rate of TULA victims claiming to have dealt with the consequences and showing no PG. The secondary objective was to determine positive and negative factors enabling and preventing coping. METHOD: A retrospective clinical study was conducted over an 11-year period in all adult TULA cases in our department. Assessment was on questionnaire. PG was assessed on the ICG (Inventory of Complicated Grief). Factors were assessed on physical, psychological, social, functional, esthetic and epidemiological criteria. Statistical analysis used StatView software, with the significance threshold set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Functional and social impacts were significantly greater in case of PG. Thumb amputation was significantly associated with PG, while PG was significantly less frequent in case of amputation at the metacarpal base. Patients in PG had significantly more often undergone neuroma resection or stump revision surgery. DISCUSSION: Fewer than a half of TULA victims achieved cure. Long-term prognosis depends on the patient's ability to accept the new situation, much more than on amputation level. Patients need support from the very first minutes, with follow-up extended well belong scar healing. Onset and healing of the narcissistic wound are inevitably delayed compared to skin healing.

Trends in the Management of Traumatic Upper Extremity Amputations.

PURPOSE: Treatment for upper extremity amputations includes revision amputation or attempted replantation. The rate of digital replantation has been declining in the United States. Prior studies discovered the presence of socioeconomic disparities associated with these injuries. The goals of this study were to investigate yearly trends of traumatic upper extremity amputations and evaluate the presence of disparities with access to care in these injuries. METHODS: The 2008 to 2014 New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) inpatient and outpatient databases were utilized to identify patients who had traumatic upper extremity amputations. We queried the database for patient characteristics, resource utilization characteristics, insurance status, major in-hospital complications, and mortality. Patients at low-, medium-, and high-volume institutions were compared. We performed multivariable logistic regressions for the binary variable replantation (yes/no) controlling for age, sex, race, insurance status, amputation level, admission hour, and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 2,492 patients met our inclusion criteria: 92.1% sustained digital amputations and 7.9% sustained arm amputations. The annual rate of inpatient finger amputations decreased significantly (1.9 per 100,000 people in 2008 vs 1.4 per 100,000 people in 2014) during the study period while that of outpatient finger amputations increased significantly (12.0 per 100,000 people in 2008 vs 15.5 per 100,000 people in 2014). Multivariable analysis demonstrated incrementally lower odds for replantation with increasing age and increased odds for replantation in patients with private insurance (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.50). The number of replantation surgeries at medium-volume institutions decreased by 45% while remaining steady in low- and high-volume institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings corroborate the findings of other studies that underscore the existence of disparities with respect to insurance status in these injuries. Replantations occur more frequently at high-volume hospitals and are more common in younger patients with private insurance. This finding suggests that patients with traumatic amputations may benefit from treatment at high-volume institutions. Further research to help improve access to such institutions is warranted. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Firework Injuries of the Hand: An Analysis of Treatment and Health Care Utilization.

Background: Firework injuries to the hand can be devastating due to the explosive and ballistic nature of these devices. The aim of this study was to describe the injury and treatment characteristics of patients requiring surgery for firework-related hand injuries and to investigate which factors are associated with an increased utilization of health care resources. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing surgery for firework-related hand injuries at two American College of Surgeons level I trauma centers between 2005 and 2016 was performed. Twenty cases were identified. These patients were evaluated for demographics, injury characteristics, number and types of surgical interventions, length of stay, and utilization of health care resources. Bivariate analyses were performed to investigate which factors were associated with increased consumption of health care resources. Results: Injuries ranged from digital nerve injuries to traumatic amputation. Patients underwent a median of 3 surgical operations. More than half the patients underwent flap or skin graft coverage of a soft tissue defect. The median length of hospital stay was 7 days. Factors found to be associated with an increased utilization of surgical and hospital resources included a first web space injury, thumb fracture, and traumatic amputation of any digit. Conclusions: The morbidity inflicted by firework injuries to individual patients is substantial. Patients with severe injuries undergo a median of three surgical operations and have a long duration of initial hospital stay. Knowing which factors are associated with an increased utilization of resources can help prognosticate these preventable injuries.

The changing shape of hand trauma: an analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics in England.

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) include freely accessible records of all hospital episodes in England. We analysed HES from 1998-1999 to 2014-2015 for diagnoses of hand fractures, tendon injuries, nerve injuries, blood vessel injuries, traumatic amputations and nail bed injuries. Population data were used to calculate the incidence. The overall incidence of the injuries increased from 70 to 110 per 100,000. There were especially large increases in the incidence of fractures in the over 75 years age group and nail bed injuries in the 0-14 years age group. The incidence of nerve injuries also increased. We conclude from this study that HES is a useful tool. The information from HES may help plan service provision and also highlight important clinical problems that may benefit from further research.

Comparisons between long-term outcomes of the use of reposition flaps and replantations in fingertip amputations.

BACKGROUND: Replantation is the gold standard procedure for traumatic amputation of fingertips. Reposition flap procedure is performed using nail-bone complex as a free graft and covering graft site with a flap to preserve original finger length, nail complex, and sensory functions of fingertip in pateints where microsurgical methods cannot be applied. In our study, we aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with amputated fingertips who underwent replantation or reposition flap procedures. METHODS: Thirty-five patients of replantation and 28 patients of reposition flap procedures only for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th fingertip amputations were included in the study. Complete fingertip amputations involved Foucher zones 2 and 3. The patients were followed up postoperatively for a median period of 13 months (9-23 months). All patients were assessed with static and dynamic 2-point discrimination tests, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and cold intolerance test for the development of neuroma on the donor site. RESULTS: In 5 patients, replantation procedure failed. In such failed patients, after the removal of necrotic tissues, the stump was either repaired or reconstruction with a flap was applied. Wound dehiscence was observed at the lateral sides of the flaps in 2 patients who underwent reposition procedures. CONCLUSION: Reposition flap repair can be a good cost-effective alternative to other fingertip repair procedures in appropriately selected patients who are not amenable to microsurgery. It preserves the length and sensory functions of fingertips and enables patients to return to their daily life as soon as possible.

Impact of traumatic upper-extremity amputation on the outcome of injury caused by an antipersonnel improvised explosive device

Background: We have previously reported a higher than expected rate of upper-extremity amputation (UEA) in victims of an antipersonnel improvised explosive device (AP-IED) compared with a similar cohort injured by antipersonnel mines (APM). The goal of this study was to describe the rate, severity and impact of UAE caused by an AP-IED. Methods: We analyzed a prospective database of 100 consecutive dismounted AP-IED victims with pattern 1 injuries to compare the outcomes of the cohort with UEA to that without. Results: We found that UEA (8 above elbow, 19 below elbow, 1 through elbow, 3 hand, 15 digit(s)) was much more prevalent with AP-IED than with APM (40% v. 6%, p < 0.001). In addition, UEA was associated with a higher rate of multiple amputations (39 [98%] v. 32 [53%], p < 0.001), bilateral lower-extremity amputation (LEA; 33 [82.5%] v. 30 [53.3%], p = 0.003) and facial injury (8 [20%] v. 4 [6.4%], p = 0.044), but not with pelvic disruption (10 [25%]), genitoperineal mutilation (19 [48%]), eye injury (6 [15%]), or skull fracture (6 [15%]). The fatality rate was higher in patients with UEA than in those without (12 [30%] v. 7 [12%], p = 0.022). Conclusion: Upper-extremity amputation is more prevalent with AP-IED than APM. Presence of UEA is associated with more severe injury and increased risk of death in AP-IED victims. Upper-limb injury has significant consequences for rehabilitation from LEA, which universally accompanies UEA in AP-IED victims. Upper-extremity injury should be amenable to prevention by innovative personal protective equipment designed to protect the flexed elbow.

Contexte: Nous avons déjà fait état d'un taux plus élevé que prévu d'amputations des membres supérieurs (AMS) chez les victimes d'engins explosifs artisanaux (EEA) comparativement à une cohorte similaire blessée par des mines antipersonnel (MAP). L'objectif de cette étude est de décrire le taux, la gravité et l'impact des AMS causées par des EEA. Méthodes: Nous avons analysé une base de données prospective de 100 victimes consécutives d'EEA alors qu'elles se trouvaient hors de leur véhicule et présentant des blessures de type 1 afin de comparer les résultats des cohortes ayant subi ou non des AMS. Résultats: Nous avons constaté que l'AMS (8 au-dessus du coude, 19 sous le coude, 1 au niveau du coude, 3 mains et 15 doigts) était beaucoup plus prévalente avec les EEA qu'avec les MAP (40 % c. 6 %, p < 0,001). De plus, l'AMS a été associée à un taux plus élevé d'amputations multiples (39 [98 %] c. 32 [53 %], p < 0,001), d'amputations bilatérales des membres inférieurs (AMI) (33 [82,5 %] c. 30 [53,3 %], p = 0,003) et de blessures au visage (8 [20 %] c. 4 [6,4 %], p = 0,044), mais non de blessures au bassin (10 [25%]), de mutilations génitopérinéales (19 [48 %]), de blessures oculaires (6 [15 %]), ou de fractures du crâne (6 [15 %]). Le taux de létalité a été plus élevé chez les patients ayant subi une AMS que chez ceux qui n'en ont pas subi (12 [30 %] c. 7 [12 %], p = 0,022). Conclusion: L'amputation des membres supérieurs est plus prévalente avec les EEA qu'avec les MAP. L'AMS est associée à des blessures plus graves et à un risque plus grand de décès chez les victimes d'un EEA. Les blessures aux membres supérieurs ont de graves conséquences sur la réadaptation nécessaire après l'AMI, qui accompagne presque toujours l'AMS chez les victimes d'un EEA. Les blessures aux membres supérieurs devraient pouvoir être évitées grâce à de l'équipement de protection individuelle novateur conçu pour protéger le coude fléchi.

Finger Replantation Optimization Study (FRONT): Update on National Trends.

PURPOSE: Traumatic digit amputations have an adverse impact on patients' daily living. Despite experts advocating for digit replantation, studies have shown a continued decrease in rate of replantation. We performed a national-level investigation to examine the recent trend of practice for digital replantation. METHODS: We used the National Inpatient Sample database under the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to select adult patients with traumatic digit amputation from 2001 to 2014. We calculated the rate of attempted and rate of successful digit replantation per year, subcategorizing for digit type (thumb or finger) and for hospital type (rural, urban nonteaching, or urban teaching). We also analyzed the pattern of distribution of case volume to each hospital type per year. We used 2 multivariable logistic regression models to investigate patient demographic and hospital characteristics associated with the odds of replantation attempt and success. RESULTS: Among the 14,872 adult patients with a single digit amputation from 2001 to 2014, only 1,670 (11.2%) underwent replantation. The rate of replantation attempt trended down over the years for both thumb and finger injuries at all hospital types, despite increasing proportions of cases being sent to urban teaching hospitals where they were more than twice as likely to undergo replantation. The rate of successful replantation stayed stable for the thumb at 82.9% and increased for fingers from 76.1% to 82.4% over the years. Patients were more likely to undergo replantation if they had private insurance or a higher level of income. Neither hospital case volume nor hospital type was predictive of successful replantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although more single-digit amputations were treated by urban teaching hospitals with higher likelihood to replant, the downward trend in rate of attempt regardless of hospital type demonstrates that concentration of case volume is not the solution to reverse the declining trend. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Financial aspects of digit replantation need to be considered from both the patients' and the surgeons' perspectives to improve delivery of care for digit replantation.

Three-year (2014-2016) activity report of the Replantation Service for hand amputations in Poland.

The paper summarizes 32 months (January 2014 - August 2016) of activity of the Replantation Service for hand amputation in Poland. Over this period a total of 568 cases of total and subtotal amputations as well as other complex injuries to the hand were referred. Of these, 354 referrals (62%) were accepted and 214 (38%) rejected. Among accepted, there were 167 total (47%) and 142 subtotal (40%) amputations; 45 patients (13%) had other severe hand injuries. Vast majority of the patients constituted males aged a mean of 39 years. The most common injury was amputation of several digits in one patient, and thumb amputation - a total of 229 cases (65%), followed by transmetacarpal and wrist amputations - 92 (30%) and forearm/arm amputations - 33 cases (9%). Replantation of amputated extremity was performed in 141 patients (40%), revascularization in 145 (41%) and in 29 (8%) primary repair of the complex injuries. In 27 cases (8%), a coverage of the tissue defects, and in 12 (3%) primary terminalization was performed. Survival rate was of 78% for replantation and revascularization. Comparing to the period 2010-2012, an increase in number of treated patients (of n=64 cases), in number of amputations (of 96 cases) and in number of amputated digits (of 88 cases) were noted. The activity report shows importance of Replantation Service, an informal structure, in saving limbs of severely mutilated patients.

Disappearing Digits: Analysis of National Trends in Amputation and Replantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Significantly fewer replantations have been performed at the authors' institution in recent years, with similar trends observed across the United States. A study of three national databases was performed to evaluate this trend, its possible cause, and national health care implications. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and National Inpatient Sample databases were queried for cases with a diagnosis of finger amputation over available years from 2000 to 2011. Data were weighted and analyzed to give appropriate national estimates of amputations, replantations, and related clinical variables. Trend analysis was performed using modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: Although workplace finger amputation rates decreased 40 percent from 2000 to 2010 (p < 0.0001), the overall finger amputation incidence did not change significantly (26,668 versus 24,215; p = 0.097). Compared with 930 replantations in 2001, only 445 were performed in 2011, more than a 50 percent decrease (p < 0.001). In all years, the majority of hospitals performing replantation performed only one (49.3 to 64.1 percent) each year, with a small minority (2.2 to 8.1 percent) performing more than 10 per year. In 2000, 120 hospitals (12.1 percent) performed at least one replantation, compared with only 80 hospitals (7.6 percent) in 2010, a 4.6 percent annual decline (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: There has been a striking decline in digital replantations being performed, despite a relatively stable incidence of amputations. Apparently independent of declining work-related injuries, evolving clinical decision-making may be responsible for this trend. Decreasing replantation experience among hand surgeons lends credence to the development of specialized regional centers designed to treat these complex injuries.

Incidence, Timing, and Risk Factors for Secondary Revision After Primary Revision of Traumatic Digit Amputations.

PURPOSE: Primary revision amputation is the most common treatment method for traumatic digit amputations in the United States. Few studies have reported secondary revision rates after primary revision amputation. The primary aim of our study was to identify risk factors for secondary revision within 1 year of the index procedure. Secondarily, we describe the incidence and timing of complications requiring secondary revision. METHODS: Our institution's emergency department (ED) database was reviewed for traumatic digit amputations over a 6-year period. Patients were reviewed for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, site of treatment (ED versus operating room), and complications requiring secondary revision. Conditional Cox Proportional Hazard regression was used to model hazard of revision within 1 year of index procedure relative to site of initial management, mechanism of injury, injury characteristics, and patient demographics. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-seven patients with 677 digits were managed with primary revision amputation. Five hundred and eighty-six digits (86.6%) were revised in the ED, and 91 (13.4%) in the operating room. Ninety-one digits required secondary revision, including 83 within 1 year. No increased risk of secondary revision amputation within 1 year of the index procedure was observed for patients treated in the ED compared with the operating room. Relative to crush injuries, bite and sharp laceration amputations had 4.8 times and 2.6 times increased risk of secondary revision, respectively. The index finger had a 5.3-fold increased risk of revision with the thumb as the reference digit. Work-related injuries had a 1.9-fold increased risk of secondary revision compared with non-work-related injuries. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found indicating that traumatic digit amputations primarily revised in the ED had an increased risk of secondary revision. Patients may be counseled on the risk of secondary procedures based on the mechanism of injury, injury characteristics and demographics, as well as the timing of complications. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Epidemiology of traumatic upper limb amputations.

INTRODUCTION: While published data on functional outcomes after upper limb amputations are plentiful, epidemiology data are relatively rare. This led us to performing an epidemiology study of traumatic upper limb amputations at our facility. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study spanned a 10-year period of cases seen at the SOS Main (Hand emergency center) of the Nancy University Hospital in France. Patients who suffered traumatic amputation of the upper limb were identified and divided into two groups: replantation and surgical amputation. All anatomical amputation levels were retained. Non-traumatic amputations were excluded. Epidemiology data (sex, age, dominant side, injured side) was collected along with the specific anatomical level of the injury, the injury mechanism and whether it was work-related. We also looked at the success rate of microsurgery and whether multi-finger amputations were partial or complete. In parallel, the annual incidence of amputations seen at the SOS Main over this period was calculated. RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, 1715 traumatic upper-limb amputations were identified, which was 3% of all cases seen at the SOS Main. Most of the cases involved middle-aged men. Revascularization was attempted in one-third of cases and microsurgery was successful in 70% of cases. The surgical amputation group consisted of 1132 patients with a mean age of 59 years, while the replantation group consisted of 583 patients with a mean age of 48 years. The primary mechanism of injury was a table saw. DISCUSSION: This injury, which must be addressed urgently, is not very common in everyday practice. This is contrary to lower limb amputations, which are more common and occur in the context of micro- and macroangiopathy in older patients. The success rate of microsurgery in this cohort must be placed in the context of age, amputation level and mechanism. The functional outcomes are not always as good as the vascular outcomes. This data is invaluable as it fills a gap in our knowledge about amputations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Despite surgical and technical advances in microsurgery, it is still difficult to obtain satisfactory results after replantation of finger amputation. The aim of the present study was to discuss some of the many factors that can affect the success rate of replantation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 60 patients with 85 finger replantations was performed. Revascularizations and replantations proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joint were excluded. Demographic characteristics of the patients, place of injury, mechanism of injury, level of amputation, and success rate were examined. RESULTS: A total of 53 male and 7 female patients with mean age of 31 years were included in the study. Index finger (27%) was the most commonly replanted digit. Left side was the more affected, with 62%. Mechanism of injury was crush in 56%, guillotine in 23%, and avulsion in 21% of replanted digits. Success rate was 81%, 53%, and 36% in guillotine, crush, and avulsion injuries, respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the injury type and personal variables are very important in the rate of replantation success. Knowledge about the effects of different factors on the results of replantation surgery will provide guidance to hand surgeons in order to inform patients and their relatives properly.

Fingertip Injuries in Children: Epidemiology, Financial Burden, and Implications for Prevention.

BACKGROUND: Although fingertip injuries are common, there is limited literature on the epidemiology and hospital charges for fingertip injuries in children. This descriptive study reports the clinical features of and hospital charges for fingertip injuries in a large pediatric population treated at a tertiary medical center. METHODS: Our hospital database was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Revision 9 (ICD-9) codes, and medical records were reviewed. Frequency statistics were generated for 1807 patients with fingertip injuries who presented to the emergency department (ED) at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH) between 2005 and 2011. Billing records were analyzed for financial data. RESULTS: A total of 1807 patients were identified for this study; 59% were male, and the mean age at time of injury was 8 years. Most commonly, injuries occurred when a finger was crushed (n = 831, 46%) in a door or window. Average length of stay in the ED was 3 hours 45 minutes, 25% of cases needed surgery, and, on average, patients had more than 1 follow-up appointment. About one-third of patients were referred from outside institutions. The average ED charge for fingertip injuries was $1195 in 2014, which would amount to about $320 430 each year (in 2014 dollars) for fingertip injuries presenting to BCH. CONCLUSION: Fingertip injuries in children are common and result in significant burden, yet are mostly preventable. Most injuries occur at home in a door or window. Although these patients generally heal well, fingertip injuries pose a health, time, and financial burden. Increased awareness and education may help to avoid these injuries.