C-terminally truncated constitutively active androgen receptor variants and their biologic and clinical significance in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

A mechanism allowing castration resistant prostate cancer cells to escape the effects of conventional anti-hormonal treatments is the synthesis of constitutively active, C-terminally truncated androgen receptor (AR)-variants. Lacking the entire or vast parts of the ligand binding domain, the intended target of traditional endocrine therapies, these AR-variants (termed ARΔLBD) are insensitive to all traditional treatments including second generation compounds like abiraterone, enzalutamide or ARN-509. Although ARΔLBD are predominantly products of alternative splicing, they can also be products of nonsense mutations or proteolytic cleavage. In this review, we will discuss the etiology and function of c-terminally truncated AR-variants and their clinical significance as markers/targets for the treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer.

Targeting extra-gonadal androgens in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is associated with a rise in PSA, suggesting an increase in transcription of steroid receptor regulated genes. The efficacy of the new anti-androgen therapies abiraterone and enzalutamide, that target extra-gonadal activation of androgen signaling, confirm CRPC's addiction to genes regulated by the androgen receptor (AR). However, patients invariably progress and develop resistance. This review focuses on mechanisms of drug resistance associated with the AR and steroidogenesis in CRPC. Understanding this persistent dependency and adaptation to the androgen axis in CRPC will lead to an understanding of resistance to new licensed therapies and to novel drug discovery, ultimately improving clinical outcome in CRPC. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Essential role of DHEA'.

Androgen receptor variant-7: an important predictive biomarker in castrate resistant prostate cancer.

The recent manuscript in New England Journal of Medicine by Antonarakis et al. [1] has important clinical implications. This study evaluates mRNA expression of a particular androgen receptor splice variant-7 (AR-V7), in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving enzalutamide or abiraterone. The findings were striking, none of the 18 patients with detectable AR-V7 in CTCs had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses. Further, the median time to PSA progression after enzalutamide or abiraterone treatment was only 1.3-1.4 months in AR-V7-positive patients as compared to 5.3-6.1 months in AR-V7 negative patients. AR-V7 in CTCs was also associated with shorter survival.

Combined blockade of testicular and locally made androgens in prostate cancer: a highly significant medical progress based upon intracrinology.

Recently two drugs, namely the antiandrogen MDV-3100 and the inhibitor of 17α-hydroxylase abiraterone have been accepted by the FDA for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with or without previous chemotherapy, with a prolongation of overall survival of 2.2-4.8 months. While medical (GnRH agonist) or surgical castration reduces the serum levels of testosterone by about 97%, an important concentration of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone remains in the prostate and activates the androgen receptor (AR), thus offering an explanation for the positive data obtained in CRPC. In fact, explanation of the response observed with MDV-3100 or enzalutamide in CRPC is essentially a blockade of the action or formation of intraprostatic androgens. In addition to the inhibition of the action or formation of androgens made locally by the mechanisms of intracrinology, increased AR levels and AR mutations can be involved, especially in very advanced disease. Future developments look at more efficient inhibitors of the action or formation of intraprostatic androgens and starting treatment earlier when blockade of androgens can exert long-term control and even cure prostate cancer treated at a stage before the appearance of metastases. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Essential role of DHEA'.

Effects of abiraterone acetate on chronic kidney disease in 2 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in most Western countries. In this report, we present 2 cases of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and chronic kidney disease. Both patients underwent and developed clinical resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy. Subsequently, the patients were treated with the conventional chemotherapeutic approach, which resulted in the worsening of renal function and performance status. Therefore, we opted for treatment with abiraterone acetate, and the patients exhibited improvements in renal function with good response of the disease.

[Clinical efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis]. / Az enzalutamid klinikai hatásossága és biztonságossága metasztatikus, kasztrációrezisztens prosztatarákban: szisztematikus irodalomkeresés és metaanalízis.

Enzalutamide, abiraterone-acetate, and cabazitaxel are licensed post-docetaxel treatments of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in Hungary. The objectives of the study were to assess the efficacy and safety of post-docetaxel enzalutamide treatment and to compare it with abiraterone and with cabazitaxel, using Medline-based systematic literature search, and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT). Overall 3 RCTs were included, one for each substance. Compared to placebo, enzalutamide proved significant efficacy in each primary and secondary endpoint. Enzalutamide extended median overall survival by 4.8 months. Due to lack of a common comparator in the cabazitaxel trial, only enzalutamide and abiraterone were involved in an indirect comparison. No significant difference was identified either in the primary endpoint (overall survival) (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.75-1.25) or in frequencies of adverse events between these two treatments. However, enzalutamide was significantly more efficacious than abiraterone in 3 secondary endpoints: time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.31-0.59), radiographic progression-free survival (HR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.72), and PSA response rate (RR: 7.48, 95% CI: 2.83-19.72). Enzalutamide therapy proved clinical efficacy and safety in patients with post-docetaxel mCRPC. In the indirect comparison, efficacy and safety of abiraterone and enzalutamide were found to be similar.

AR-V7 and resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The androgen-receptor isoform encoded by splice variant 7 lacks the ligand-binding domain, which is the target of enzalutamide and abiraterone, but remains constitutively active as a transcription factor. We hypothesized that detection of androgen-receptor splice variant 7 messenger RNA (AR-V7) in circulating tumor cells from men with advanced prostate cancer would be associated with resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone. METHODS: We used a quantitative reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay to evaluate AR-V7 in circulating tumor cells from prospectively enrolled patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were initiating treatment with either enzalutamide or abiraterone. We examined associations between AR-V7 status (positive vs. negative) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates (the primary end point), freedom from PSA progression (PSA progression-free survival), clinical or radiographic progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 31 enzalutamide-treated patients and 31 abiraterone-treated patients were enrolled, of whom 39% and 19%, respectively, had detectable AR-V7 in circulating tumor cells. Among men receiving enzalutamide, AR-V7-positive patients had lower PSA response rates than AR-V7-negative patients (0% vs. 53%, P=0.004) and shorter PSA progression-free survival (median, 1.4 months vs. 6.0 months; P<0.001), clinical or radiographic progression-free survival (median, 2.1 months vs. 6.1 months; P<0.001), and overall survival (median, 5.5 months vs. not reached; P=0.002). Similarly, among men receiving abiraterone, AR-V7-positive patients had lower PSA response rates than AR-V7-negative patients (0% vs. 68%, P=0.004) and shorter PSA progression-free survival (median, 1.3 months vs. not reached; P<0.001), clinical or radiographic progression-free survival (median, 2.3 months vs. not reached; P<0.001), and overall survival (median, 10.6 months vs. not reached, P=0.006). The association between AR-V7 detection and therapeutic resistance was maintained after adjustment for expression of full-length androgen receptor messenger RNA. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of AR-V7 in circulating tumor cells from patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer may be associated with resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone. These findings require large-scale prospective validation. (Funded by the Prostate Cancer Foundation and others.).

A retrospective, Canadian multi-center study examining the impact of prior response to abiraterone acetate on efficacy of docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Questions about optimal sequencing of systemic therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and whether cross-resistance occurs between different drugs remain largely unanswered. Previous studies have produced conflicting data on the activity of docetaxel in patients who did not attain a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response to abiraterone acetate (abiraterone). We investigated whether the biochemical response to abiraterone is associated with efficacy of subsequent docetaxel therapy. METHODS: mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel after abiraterone were retrospectively identified at three Canadian institutions. Patients who had also received docetaxel prior to abiraterone were termed "docetaxel-experienced," while those not treated with docetaxel prior to abiraterone were termed "docetaxel-naïve." Treatment outcomes on docetaxel were stratified by prior response to abiraterone and compared using χ(2) -square test for confirmed PSA response rate (≥ 50% decline from baseline maintained for ≥ 3 weeks) and the log-rank method for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were treated with abiraterone, of whom 49 were docetaxel-experienced and 37 were docetaxel-naïve. Prior PSA response to abiraterone was no decline, <50% decline and ≥ 50% decline in 37%, 26%, and 37% of patients respectively. The overall PSA response rate to docetaxel was 34.9%, median PFS was 4.0 months and median OS was 11.66 months. Notably, no differences were seen in confirmed PSA response rates (38% vs. 36% vs. 31%, P = 0.86), median PFS (4.04 months vs. 3.94 months vs. 4.24 months, P = 0.43) and median OS (11.86 months vs. 15.38 months vs. 11.00 months, P = 0.56) on docetaxel for patients with no PSA decline, <50% decline and ≥ 50% decline on abiraterone respectively. Importantly, PSA response rates to docetaxel were comparable in the docetaxel-experienced and docetaxel-naïve cohorts and were not linked to prior response to abiraterone in either group. CONCLUSION: Activity of docetaxel was not associated with the biochemical response to prior abiraterone therapy. These data suggest that prior response to abiraterone should not influence decisions on subsequent use of docetaxel in mCRPC.

[Abiraterone acetate(ZYTIGA®)-development and literature review].

Abiraterone acetate(AA)has been approved in more than 80 countries for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer(mCRPC). In July 2013, a marketing approval application for AA was submitted to the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. AA is a selective inhibitor of CYP17A1, a crucial enzyme for androgen biosynthesis. AA exerts its anti-tumor activity by directly inhibiting androgen production at all three sources, i. e., the testes, adrenal glands, and tumor itself. Data from international phase III studies and phase I and II studies in Japan have indicated that AA improves the overall survival and quality of life(QoL)of patients with mCRPC. Herein, we have summarized the development of AA and the results of important international and local clinical trials in Japan. In addition, the effect of food on AA bioavailability, concomitant steroid use, and liver function test abnormalities have been discussed regarding the appropriate use of AA.

Clinical activity of enzalutamide versus docetaxel in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after abiraterone.

BACKGROUND: The optimal sequencing of the multiple active agents now available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unclear. Prior reports have suggested diminished responses to sequential lines of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies, but it is unknown whether subsequent taxane-based chemotherapy may be more effective than sequential AR-targeting treatment. We sought to evaluate the clinical activity of enzalutamide versus docetaxel in men with mCRPC who progressed on abiraterone. METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of consecutive mCRPC patients who had progressed on abiraterone therapy and subsequently received either enzalutamide (n=30) or docetaxel (n=31). We evaluated clinical outcomes including prostate-specific antigen decline of >30% (PSA30) or >50% (PSA50), PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), and clinical/radiographic PFS. We performed multivariable modeling to control for baseline and on-treatment differences between groups. RESULTS: Compared to subjects who received enzalutamide post-abiraterone, subjects who received docetaxel post-abiraterone had more bone metastases, more visceral metastases, higher baseline PSA, and had more frequent PSA tests while on-treatment. There were no significant differences in PSA30 (41% for enzalutamide vs. 53% for docetaxel) or PSA50 (34% vs. 40%) response rates between the two groups; there remained no difference after stratifying by presence/absence of prior response to abiraterone. Median PSA-PFS was 4.1 versus 4.1 months for the enzalutamide and docetaxel cohorts, respectively (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 0.53-3.66, P=0.502). Median PFS was 4.7 versus 4.4 months, respectively (HR 1.44, 95% CI, 0.77-2.71, P=0.257). PSA-PFS and PFS did not differ after stratifying by prior response to abiraterone. In multivariable analyses, there were no significant differences in PSA-PFS or PFS between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with either enzalutamide or docetaxel produced modest PSA responses and PFS intervals in this abiraterone-pretreated mCRPC population. In this retrospective study with small sample size, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between groups. Therefore, either enzalutamide or docetaxel may be a reasonable option in men who have progressed on abiraterone.

Prostate cancer: the best fit for enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer.

The PREVAIL trial compared enzalutamide and placebo in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy, demonstrating an improvement in overall survival and other clinical, radiographic, and biochemical outcomes. Herein, the implications of these data in the rapidly changing landscape of metastatic prostate cancer therapy are discussed.