Neutrophils and Anesthetic Drugs: Implications in Onco-Anesthesia.

Apart from being a significant line of defense in the host defense system, neutrophils have many immunological functions. Although there are not many publications that accurately present the functions of neutrophils in relation to oncological pathology, their activity and implications have been studied a lot recently. This review aims to extensively describe neutrophils functions'; their clinical implications, especially in tumor pathology; the value of clinical markers related to neutrophils; and the implications of neutrophils in onco-anesthesia. This review also aims to describe current evidence on the influence of anesthetic drugs on neutrophils' functions and their potential influence on perioperative outcomes.

Use of herbal medication in the perioperative period: Potential adverse drug interactions.

Use of herbal medications and supplements has experienced immense growth over the last two decades, with retail sales in the USA exceeding $13 billion in 2021. Since the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) of 1994 reduced FDA oversight, these products have become less regulated. Data from 2012 shows 18% of U.S. adults used non-vitamin, non-mineral natural products. Prevalence varies regionally, with higher use in Western states. Among preoperative patients, the most commonly used herbal medications included garlic, ginseng, ginkgo, St. John's wort, and echinacea. However, 50-70% of surgical patients fail to disclose their use of herbal medications to their physicians, and most fail to discontinue them preoperatively. Since herbal medications can interact with anesthetic medications administered during surgery, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA) recommend stopping herbal medications 1-2 weeks before elective surgical procedures. Potential adverse drug effects related to preoperative use of herbal medications involve the coagulation system (e.g., increasing the risk of perioperative bleeding), the cardiovascular system (e.g., arrhythmias, hypotension, hypertension), the central nervous system (e.g., sedation, confusion, seizures), pulmonary (e.g., coughing, bronchospasm), renal (e.g., diuresis) and endocrine-metabolic (e.g., hepatic dysfunction, altered metabolism of anesthetic drugs). During the preoperative evaluation, anesthesiologists should inquire about the use of herbal medications to anticipate potential adverse drug interactions during the perioperative period.

Anesthetic recommendations for maternal and fetal safety in nonobstetric surgery: a balancing act.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy is associated with maternal and fetal risks. Several physiologic changes create unique challenges for anesthesiologists. This review highlights physiologic changes of pregnancy and presents clinical recommendations based on recent literature to guide anesthetic management for the pregnant patient undergoing nonobstetric surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Nearly every anesthetic technique has been safely used in pregnant patients. Although it is difficult to eliminate confounding factors, exposure to anesthetics could endanger fetal brain development. Perioperative fetal monitoring decisions require an obstetric consult based on anticipated maternal and fetal concerns. Given the limitations of fasting guidelines, bedside gastric ultrasound is useful in assessing aspiration risk in pregnant patients. Although there is concern about appropriateness of sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal due its binding to progesterone, preliminary literature supports its safety. SUMMARY: These recommendations will equip anesthesiologists to provide safe care for the pregnant patient and fetus undergoing nonobstetric surgery.

Impact of anesthesia on postoperative breast cancer prognosis: A narrative review.

The incidence of breast cancer has exhibited an annually increasing trend, and the disease has become the most common malignant tumour worldwide. Currently, the primary treatment for breast cancer is surgical resection. However, metastatic recurrence is the main cause of cancer-related death in this patient population. Various factors are associated with breast cancer prognosis, and anaesthesia-induced changes in the tumour microenvironment have attracted increasing attention. To date, however, it remains unclear whether anaesthetic drugs have a positive or negative impact on cancer outcomes after surgery. The present article reviews the effects of different anaesthetics on the postoperative prognosis of breast cancer surgery to guide the choice of anaesthetic technique(s) and agents for such patients.

[Anafilaxia perioperatoria a sevoflurano, un caso muy raro].

Background: Perioperative anaphylaxis can be life-threatening. The global incidence is estimated to be 1 in 10,000-20,000 procedures. The most common agents are neuromuscular blockers, latex, and antibiotics. There are very few reports of allergies to inhaled anesthetics such as sevoflurane, which is considered relatively safe in patients with drug allergies. Case report: 12-year-old patient, admitted to oncology, diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. History of two perioperative hypersensitivity reactions. In the first event, lidocaine and rupivacaine were administered, he presented urticaria, managed with an antihistamine. On the second occasion, he received only sevoflurane and presented anaphylaxis, treated with intramuscular adrenaline. Later during intrathecal therapy, he received sevoflurane, he presented rash and arterial hypotension, managed again with adrenaline, with total remission of symptoms. Retrospectively Brighton criteria level I of certainty, classified as serious by Brown. Hypersensitivity to sevoflurane was suspected, ruling out other anesthetics such as lidocaine and rupivacaine with negative intradermal skin tests. Molecular components for latex were requested with negative results for Hev b 1, Hev b 3, Hev b 6. Due to the above and associated with the characteristics of the drug, a basophil activation test for sevoflurane was performed with an activation percentage of 50% (positive). Perioperative anaphylaxis due to sevoflurane is confirmed. Conclusion: All drugs involved in perioperative hypersensitivity reactions should be considered to establish adequate and safe treatment alternatives for this small group of patients.

Antecedentes: La anafilaxia perioperatoria puede amenazar la vida del paciente. La incidencia global se estima 1 entre 10.000-20.000 procedimientos. Los agen- tes más frecuentes son bloqueadores neuromusculares, látex y antibióticos. Hay muy pocos reportes de alergia a anestésicos inhalados como el sevoflurano, el cual se considera relativamente seguro en pacientes con alergia a fármacos. Reporte de caso: Paciente de 12 años, ingresó en oncología, diagnóstico de leucemia linfoblástica aguda. Antecedente de dos reacciones de hipersensibilidad perioperatorias. En primer evento se administró lidocaína y rupivacaína, presentó urticaria, manejado con antihistamínico. Segunda ocasión recibió sólo sevo- fluorano y presentó anafilaxia, tratado con adrenalina intramuscular. Posteriormente durante terapia intratecal, recibió sevoflurano, presentó rash e hipotensión arterial, manejo nuevamente con adrenalina, con remisión total de síntomas. Retrospectivamente criterios de Brighton nivel I de certeza, clasificada grave por Brown. Se sospechó hipersensibilidad a sevoflurano, descartando otros anestésicos como lidocaína y rupivacaina con pruebas cutáneas intradérmicas negativas. Se solicitaron componentes moleculares para látex con resultados negativos para Hev b 1, Hev b 3, Hev b 6. Por lo anterior y asociado a las características del fármaco se realiza prueba de activación de basófilos para sevoflurano con un porcentaje de activación del 50% (positivo). Se confirma anafilaxia perioperatoria por sevoflurano. Conclusión: Deben considerarse todos los fármacos involucrados en las reacciones de hipersensibilidad perioperatoria, para establecer alternativas adecuadas y seguras de tratamiento de este pequeño grupo de pacientes.

Tumour excisional surgery, anaesthetic-analgesic techniques, and oncologic outcomes: a narrative review.

Cancer is a growing global burden; there were an estimated 18 million new cancer diagnoses worldwide in 2020. Excisional surgery remains one of the main treatments for solid organ tumours in cancer patients and is potentially curative. Cancer- and surgery-induced inflammatory processes can facilitate residual tumour cell survival, growth, and subsequent recurrence. However, it has been hypothesised that anaesthetic and analgesic techniques during surgery might influence the risk of cancer recurrence. This narrative review aims to provide an updated summary of recent observational studies and new randomised controlled clinical trials on whether certain specific anaesthetic and analgesic techniques or perioperative interventions during tumour resection surgery of curative intent materially affect long-term oncologic outcomes.

Best Practices for the Care of Breastfeeding Patients Requiring Local or General Anesthesia.

The care of breastfeeding patients who require anesthesia presents unique challenges; therefore, caregivers must be knowledgeable regarding drugs' pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles to ensure the safety of the breastfed infant. Although most anesthetic drugs are compatible with breastfeeding, health care providers continue to advise patients to "pump and dump." This advice can lead to undesirable outcomes, including interruption or cessation of breastfeeding, creating possible physical and psychological challenges for parents and their neonates. This article outlines best practices for the care of breastfeeding patients receiving anesthesia.

The Choice of Anesthetic Drugs in Outpatient Hysteroscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Hysteroscopy is a minimally invasive gynecologic technique that is widely practiced in outpatient procedures. The choice of anesthesia is a key factor for the surgical outcome and postoperative recovery. This study was conducted to assess the effects of different anesthetic modalities based on dexmedetomidine in outpatient hysteroscopic surgery anesthesia. Methods: We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis of outpatient hysteroscopic surgery anesthesia. We searched Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane-Library from database inception to December 31, 2021. Duplicate literature was excluded and screened separately for initial screening at three tiers: article title, abstract, and full text before deciding whether to include in this study against the above criteria. Results after analysis of categorical variables were expressed as ORR Ratio (95% CI) and continuous variables were expressed as Mean Difference (95% CI). Data collation and analyses were performed using the gemtc package in the R language. Results: Four trials were finally included with data for 301 participants, three anesthetic drugs, and five anesthetic modalities. A fixed-effects model was used for the different anesthesia modalities without significant heterogeneity (all I2<20%) in the analysis of adverse events (AEs), the incidence of respiratory depression, operative time, and time in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Remimazolam tosylate was associated with a lower incidence of AEs versus dexmedetomidine, and significant differences between dexmedetomidine and propofol were absent. Propofol and various doses of remimazolam tosylate resulted in a lower incidence of respiratory depression versus dexmedetomidine, with an absence of differences between propofol and dexmedetomidine. The operative time for different anesthetic modalities was, in descending order, dexmedetomidine < remimazolam tosylate (0.60 mg/kg/h <0.48 mg/kg/h) < propofol < remimazolam tosylate (1.00 mg/kg/h), despite the absence of intergroup differences. Propofol was associated with a longer time in PACU versus dexmedetomidine and remimazolam tosylate (1.00 mg/kg/h); those of dexmedetomidine and remimazolam tosylate (1.00 mg/kg/h) were similar. The time in PACU for different anesthetic modalities, in descending order, was dexmedetomidine < remimazolam tosylate (1.00 mg/kg/h) < propofol. Propofol was associated with a longer time in PACU versus dexmedetomidine and remimazolam tosylate. Conclusion: In outpatient hysteroscopic surgery anesthesia, dexmedetomidine was associated with a higher incidence of AEs and respiratory depression and a shorter operative time and time in PACU versus remimazolam tosylate and propofol. Remimazolam tosylate showed safety benefits with a similar duration of PACU stay versus dexmedetomidine. Therefore, the choice of anesthetic drugs in outpatient surgery requires consideration of the patient's conditions and preferences.

Ketamine and the At-Risk Brain.

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and delirium are undesirable consequences of surgery and anesthesia that regrettably do not have consistent predictive markers. Nor do they have reliable prophylactic or treatment methodologies. In an effort to better understand how anesthetic drugs alter the rate of postoperative delirium, Chang et al explore how patients with preoperative cognitive impairment respond to the influence of intraoperative ketamine. Patients aged 65 or older presenting for spine surgery lasting over three hours were assessed and divided into those with and without baseline cognitive impairment. Both groups either received intraoperative ketamine or did not. All patients who received intraoperative ketamine demonstrated an increase in power spectral density via electroencephalographic assessment. However, patients with preoperatively established cognitive impairment displayed a significantly diminished electroencephalographic response to ketamine. Furthermore, this subgroup also suffered an increased incidence of postoperative delirium. What is the interpretation of this finding? An accompanying editorial elegantly describes how disorders of cognition result from both predisposing and precipitating factors. In this case, patients with known cognitive impairment were more likely to endure delirium when exposed to ketamine. Is it possible that ketamine and other drugs could be used as agents to stratify cognitive risk? Should we definitively avoid such drugs as potentiators of cognitive dysfunction? A variety of contextual limitations must be entertained when interpreting the results of this study as summarized in this infographic. These are also elaborated in greater detail in both the primary article as well as its attendant editorial. The reader is encouraged to review both in their entirety for an in-depth scope of understanding.

Long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes following early exposure to general anesthetics.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nearly 100 clinical studies have been published evaluating neurodevelopmental outcomes in children following surgery and anesthesia. These studies have reported mixed results, likely attributable at least in part to significant heterogeneity in their study designs, types and numbers of exposures, patient populations evaluated, and most importantly, the outcomes that were assessed. This review aims to summarize the results from clinical studies evaluating behavioral outcomes in children exposed to surgery and anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Children with early exposure to surgery and anesthesia were found to have limited to no differences in intelligence when compared with unexposed children. However, several studies have reported more behavioral problems in children exposed to general anesthesia. An increased incidence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder has also been reported in anesthetic exposed children, particularly after multiple exposures. SUMMARY: Nearly all clinical studies of anesthetic neurotoxicity are observational in nature, so the associations between anesthetic exposure and behavioral deficits cannot yet be directly attributed to the anesthetic medication. However, the finding of deficits in some neurodevelopmental domains and not others will help guide the selection of appropriate outcomes in future studies of anesthetic neurotoxicity that can further evaluate whether anesthetic medications have an impact on neurodevelopment in children.

Perioperative and anesthetic management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Our understanding and management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have greatly improved, but perioperative and anesthetic management remain challenging. RA is not limited to joints; systemic evaluation is thus required when planning perioperative management. Especially, careful airway evaluation is needed; management of airway-related arthritis is challenging. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to prevent complications without exacerbating RA disease activity. Guidelines published in 2017 are available for perioperative management of anti-rheumatic medication in patients with rheumatic diseases undergoing elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty. However, the guidelines focus only on anti- rheumatic medications, and do not consider all aspects of perioperative management (including anesthesia). Here, we discuss the perioperative and anesthetic management of patients with RA.

Impact of surgery and anesthesia during early brain development: A perfect storm.

Neonatal surgery and concomitant anesthesia coincide with a timeframe of rapid brain development. The speed and complexity of early brain development superimposed on immature regulatory mechanisms that include incomplete cerebral autoregulation, insufficient free radical scavenging and an immature immune response puts the brain at risk. Brain injury may have long-term consequences for multiple functional domains including cognition, learning skills, and behavior. Neurodevelopmental follow-up studies have noted mild-to-moderate deficits in children who underwent major neonatal surgery and related anesthesia. The present review evaluates neonatal surgery against the background of neurobiological processes that unfold at a pace unparalleled by any other period of human brain development. First, a structured summary of early brain development is provided in order to establish theoretical groundwork. Next, literature on brain injury and neurodevelopmental outcome after neonatal surgery is discussed. Special attention is given to recent findings of structural brain damage reported after neonatal surgery. Notably, high-quality imaging data acquired before surgery are currently lacking. Third, mechanisms of injury are interrogated taking the perspective of early brain development into account. We propose a novel disease model that constitutes a triad of inflammation, vascular immaturity, and neurotoxicity of prolonged exposure to anesthetic drugs. With each of these components exacerbating the other, this amalgam incites the perfect storm, resulting in brain injury. When examining the brain, it seems intuitive to distinguish between neonates (i.e., <60 postconceptional weeks) and more mature infants, multiple and/or prolonged anesthesia exposure and single, short surgery. This review culminates in an outline of anesthetic considerations and future directions that we believe will help move the field forward.

Perioperative respiratory adverse events during ambulatory anesthesia in obese children.

Obesity is one of the most common clinical conditions in the pediatric population with an increasing prevalence ranging from 20 to 30% worldwide. It is well known that during ambulatory anesthesia, obese children are more prone to develop perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs) associated with obesity. To avoid or at least minimize these adverse effects, a thorough preoperative assessment should be undertaken as well as consideration of specific anesthetic approaches such as preoxygenation before induction of anesthesia and optimizing drug dosing. The use of short-acting opioid and nonopioid analgesics and the frequent implementation of regional anesthesia should also be included. Noninvasive airway management, protective mechanical ventilation, and complete reversion of neuromuscular blockade and awake extubation also proved to be beneficial in preventing PRAEs. During the postoperative period, continuous monitoring of oxygenation and ventilation is mandatory in obese children. In the current review, we sought to provide recommendations that might help to reduce the severity of perioperative respiratory adverse events in obese children, which could be of particular importance for reducing the rate of unplanned hospitalizations and ultimately improving the overall postoperative recovery.

Risk assessment and optimization strategies to reduce perioperative respiratory adverse events in Pediatric Anesthesia-Part 2: Anesthesia-related risk and treatment options.

Perioperative respiratory adverse events are the most common cause of critical events in children undergoing anesthesia and surgery. While many risk factors remain unmodifiable, there are numerous anesthetic management decisions which can impact the incidence and impact of these events, especially in at-risk children. Ongoing research continues to improve our understanding of both the influence of risk factors and the effect of specific interventions. This review discusses anesthesia risk factors and outlines strategies to reduce the rate and impact of perioperative respiratory adverse events with a chronologic based inquiry into anesthetic management decisions through the perioperative period from premedication to postoperative disposition.

The influence of anesthesia and surgery on fear extinction.

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated significant clinical post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms after anesthesia or surgery. Fear extinction dysfunction is a notable feature of PTSD. Although anesthetics and surgery profoundly affect memory processes, their designated effects on fear extinction have not been dissertated. Previous studies have suggested that innate immune system activation disrupts fear extinction, and surgery has been shown to increase the inflammatory response. Thus, in the current study, we examined the effects of propofol, sevoflurane, dexmedetomidine and surgery on fear extinction in adolescent mice, and further tested whether dexmedetomidine could reverse the injury effect of surgery on fear extinction through its anti-inflammatory effects. Our results showed that propofol (200 mg/kg) impaired the acquisition and recall of cued fear extinction, and surgery disrupted cued fear extinction acquisition/recall and consolidation. In contrast to cued fear extinction, contextual fear extinction was not affected by propofol or surgery. Moreover, dexmedetomidine prevented surgery-induced impairment of cued extinction acquisition and recall but not consolidation. Finally, TNF-α and IL-6 levels in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex were not necessary for the dexmedetomidine treatment effect of surgery-induced fear extinction dysfunction. The study results showed that propofol and surgery selective impaired the cued fear extinction stage in adolescent mice, and dexmedetomidine may unleash a protective effect in preventing postoperative PTSD.

Anesthetic management with remimazolam for a pediatric patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

RATIONALE: With Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) being the most common and most severe type of muscular dystrophy, DMD patients are at risk for complications from general anesthesia due to impaired cardiac and respiratory functions as the pathological condition progresses. In recent years, advances in multidisciplinary treatment have improved the prognosis of DMD patients, and the number of patients requiring surgery has increased. Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine derivative similar to midazolam. Its circulatory stability and the fact that it has an antagonist make it superior to propofol.There are no reports of pediatric patients with DMD undergoing total intravenous anesthesia with remimazolam. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 4-year boy was scheduled for single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia under general anesthesia, but the surgery was postponed because his serum creatine phosphokinase level was extremely high. DIAGNOSIS: He was diagnosed with DMD. According to the results of the genetic test, exon deletion of the DMD gene was detected using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, although he had no symptoms of DMD except for elevated serum levels of creatine phosphokinase, etc. INTERVENTION: He was admitted for the same surgical purpose. Anesthesia was induced with 3 mg of intravenously administered remimazolam. He lost the ability to respond to verbal commands. After the intravenous administration of 100 µg of fentanyl, a continuous infusion of remifentanil (1.0 µg/kg/min) and remimazolam (15 mg/h) was started, and the endotracheal tube was inserted smoothly after the administration of 10 mg of rocuronium with which the muscle twitches disappeared in train-of-four monitoring. At the end of the surgery, 15 mg of flurbiprofen was administered intravenously. After surgery, we injected 40 mg of sugammadex to confirm a train-of-four count of 100%. OUTCOMES: Although the dose of remimazolam was reduced to 5 mg/h 30 minutes before the end of the surgery, it took 20 minutes after the discontinuation of remimazolam for the patient to open his eyes upon verbal command. On postoperative Day 2, he was discharged from the hospital without any complications. LESSONS: Remimazolam was shown to be safe to use for general anesthesia in a pediatric patient with DMD.