Blood bupivacaine concentrations after pecto-serratus and serratus anterior plane injections of plain and liposomal bupivacaine in robotically-assisted mitral valve surgery: Sub-study of a randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the timing of peak blood concentrations and potential toxicity when using a combination of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for thoracic fascial plane blocks. DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic analysis. SETTING: Operating room. PATIENTS: Eighteen adult patients undergoing robotically-assisted mitral valve surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound-guided pecto-serratus and serratus anterior plane blocks using a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine HCl up to 2.5 mg/kg and liposomal bupivacaine up to 266 mg. MEASUREMENTS: Arterial plasma bupivacaine concentration. MAIN RESULTS: Samples from 13 participants were analyzed. There was substantial inter-patient variability in plasma concentrations. A geometric mean maximum bupivacaine concentration was 1492 ng/ml (range 660 to 4650 ng/ml) at median time of 30 min after injection. In 4/13 (31%) patients, plasma bupivacaine concentrations exceeded our predefined 2000 ng/ml toxic threshold. A second much smaller peak was observed about 32 h after the injection. No obvious signs of local anesthetic toxicity were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Combined injection of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for pecto-serratus/serratus anterior plane blocks produced a biphasic pattern, with the highest arterial plasma concentrations observed within 30 min. Maximum concentrations exceeded the potential toxic threshold in nearly a third of patients, but without clinical evidence of toxicity. Clinicians should not assume that routine combinations of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for thoracic fascial plane blocks are inherently safe.

The effects of target-controlled infusion of lidocaine undergoing vocal cord polypectomy: A randomized controlled trial (CONSORT compliant).

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of general anesthesia-assisted target-controlled plasma infusion of lidocaine in patients with vocal cord polypectomy using a supporting laryngoscope. METHODS: In total, 80 patients undergoing vocal cord polypectomy using a supporting laryngoscope were randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group; each group contained 40 subjects: both groups received general anesthesia; subjects in the intervention also received an additional 3 mg/L of lidocaine by target-controlled plasma infusion during induction and maintenance of anesthesia; heart rate (HR) mean arterial pressure (MAP), propofol and urapidil consumption (Uradil, which is a blood pressure drug that blocks alpha-1, is called Urapidi Hydrochloride Injection. It is produced by Germany, the enterprise name is Nycomed Deutschland GmbH, the import drug registration number is H20090715, and it is widely used in China), recovery time, and cough score (measured by Minogue et al's 5-grade scoring method) during extubation, and throat pain score (measured by visual analogue scale,[VAS]) after extubation and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in HR (P < .05) and MAP (P < .05) immediately after intubation (T2), immediately after the operation starting to support laryngoscope exposure (T3), immediately after operation field adrenergic tampon hemostasis (T4), and 5 minutes after hemostasis (T5) between the 2 groups, and significant differences were also observed in HR (P < .05) before intubation (T1). Moreover, significant differences were observed in propofol consumption (P < .05), urapidil consumption (P < .05), cough score during extubation (P < .05), and throat pain score after extubation (P < .05). However, no significant difference was observed in the recovery time (P > .05). Furthermore, no adverse events were detected in either group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that target-controlled plasma infusion of lidocaine can reduce propofol consumption in patients undergoing vocal cord polypectomy by supporting laryngoscopy, and the hemodynamics are more stable and reduce the coughing reaction in the wake period and throat pain after extubation without adverse events.

LID study: Plasma lidocaine levels following airway topicalisation for paediatric microlaryngobronchoscopy (MLB).

OBJECTIVES: A dose of 5 mg/kg lidocaine is considered appropriate for paediatric airway topicalisation. Existing literature suggests that younger children are susceptible to toxic lidocaine plasma levels and achieve this at a faster rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of this study was to ascertain peak plasma lidocaine levels after topicalisation for airway endoscopy. Secondary endpoints included: time to peak lidocaine plasma levels, signs of lidocaine toxicity (restricted to ECG changes or seizures when under anaesthesia) and clinical adverse events of laryngospasm, coughing or desaturation during the procedure. SETTING: Data were collected prospectively over 18 months at Royal Manchester Children's Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 0-8 years undergoing elective diagnostic or therapeutic airway endoscopy were included within the study. DESIGN: Standardised 2% lidocaine was used for airway topicalisation. Dose varied depending upon the practitioner's usual practice. Venous bloodsampling occurred at 5, 10, 15 and 20 min post-administration and plasma lidocaine levels (ng/ml) were analysed. RESULTS: A significant relationship exists between higher peak plasma levels and ages <18 months (p = .00973). Strong linear correlation exists between body weight and age for our cohort (r = .88). Higher peak plasma lidocaine levels occur with total dose volumes between 2 and 3 mls of 2% lidocaine local anaesthetic (p = .03) compared with <2 ml total dose volumes. Data suggest a potential relationship of lower body weights achieving higher peak plasma levels (p = .0516). Reduced interquartile variation of peak plasma lidocaine levels exists when lidocaine dosing is <5 mg/kg. CONCLUSIONS: Age and total dose volume of topicalised lidocaine have a significant relationship with plasma lidocaine levels. A dose of 5 mg/kg topicalised lidocaine for paediatric airway endoscopy is safe and provides good operating conditions. Lower patient body weights trend towards higher peak lidocaine plasma concentrations and require further investigation.

Effects of intravenous lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, and their combination on IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgical-related inflammatory responses have negative effects on postoperative recovery. Intravenous (IV) lidocaine and dexmedetomidine inhibits the inflammatory response. We investigated whether the co-administration of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine could further alleviate inflammatory responses compared with lidocaine or dexmedetomidine alone during laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: A total of 160 patients were randomly allocated into four groups following laparoscopic hysterectomy: the control group (group C) received normal saline, the lidocaine group (group L) received lidocaine (bolus infusion of 1.5 mg/kg over 10 min, 1.5 mg/kg/h continuous infusion), the dexmedetomidine group (group D) received dexmedetomidine (bolus infusion of 0.5 µg/kg over 10 min, 0.4 µg/kg/h continuous infusion), and the lidocaine plus dexmedetomidine group (group LD) received a combination of lidocaine (bolus infusion of 1.5 mg/kg over 10 min, 1.5 mg/kg/h continuous infusion) and dexmedetomidine (bolus infusion of 0.5 µg/kg over 10 min, 0.4 µg/kg/h continuous infusion). The levels of plasma interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) at different time points were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic variables, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, time to first flatus, and incidence of nausea and vomiting after surgery. RESULTS: The levels of plasma IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α were lower in groups D and LD than in group C and were lowest in group LD at the end of the procedure and 2 h after the operation (P < 0.05). The VAS scores were decreased in groups D and LD compared with group C (P < 0.05). The heart rate (HR) was decreased at the end of the procedure and 2 h after the operation in groups D and LD compared to groups C and L (P < 0.001). The mean blood pressure (MBP) was lower at 2 h after the operation in groups L, D, and LD than in group C (P < 0.001). There was a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in group LD than in group C (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine significantly alleviated the inflammatory responses, decreased postoperative pain, and led to fewer PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03276533 ), registered on August 23, 2017.

Studying the effect of vasopressors on therapeutic drug monitoring of two local anesthetics using hybrid micelle liquid chromatography as an analysis tool.

A hybrid micelle based mobile phase was used to develop and validate a liquid chromatographic method for the separation and quantification of two local anesthetics namely; lidocaine hydrochloride (LID), and bupivacaine hydrochloride (BPV) in presence of the frequently co administered vasopressors phenyl ephrine (PHR) and ephedrine (EPH). Optimization of chromatographic separation conditions was performed applying experimental one factor at a time tool, and design of experiment, where the retention behavior of all analytes using both optimization protocols was in accordance. Chromatographic separation was carried on a C8 column operating at 40 °C at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. using a mobile phase consisting of 0.18 M sodium dodecyl sulphate, 10% acetonitrile, containing 0.3% triethyl amine and adjusted to pH 7 using 2 M ortho phosphoric acid, adopting UV detection at 230 nm. The proposed method was fully validated and applied to both in vitro and in vivo analysis of rat blood samples. The pharmacokinetics of both LID and BPV was followed when they were solitary injected or when co administered with either PHR or EPH. Moreover, the in vitro spiked experiment was also subjected to documented bio-analytical validation procedures.

The Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Dual Transversus Abdominis Plane (BD-TAP) Block in ERAS Program of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Blinded, Clinical Study.

PURPOSE: Postoperative pain management for patients undergoing hepatic resection is still a challenge due to the risk of perioperative liver dysfunction. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a promising regional analgesic technique. However, the correct guidelines regarding the dose and regimen of local anesthetics in patients undergoing hepatic resection have yet to be established completely. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided BD-TAP block with a large dose of ropivacaine in laparoscopic hepatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled study was conducted with 50 patients who were scheduled for selective laparoscopic hepatectomy. Patients who received a BD-TAP block (3 mg/kg of ropivacaine diluted to 60 mL) with general anesthesia were categorized into the BD-TAP block group (n = 25), and those who received general anesthesia were categorized into the control group (n = 25). The primary outcomes were consumption of sufentanil within 48 hours post-operation and plasma ropivacaine concentration. The secondary outcomes were the severity of pain (at rest and upon coughing), nausea and/or vomiting, and quality of recovery. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the patients in BD-TAP block group had a significant reduction of postoperative sufentanil consumption at 2 hours (P = 0.019), 24 hours (P = 0.001), and 48 hours (P = 0.001), and the visual analog scale (VAS) scores on coughing were significantly lower at postoperative 2 hours (P = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative nausea and/or vomiting, flatus, catheter removal, off-bed activity, liver function, or postoperative hospital stay. The mean peak total ropivacaine concentration was 1,067.85 ng/mL, which occurred 1 hour after administering the block, and mean free ropivacaine concentration was 52.32 ng/mL. The highest individual peak plasma concentration was 2,360.90 ng/mL at 45 min postinjection, and the free ropivacaine concentration was 139.29 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided BD-TAP block provides effective postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic hepatectomy. This study also confirms that ultrasound-guided BD-TAP blocks with 3 mg/kg ropivacaine during laparoscopic hepatectomy almost never results in the plasma ropivacaine concentrations associated with neurotoxicity.

Serum Concentrations of Lidocaine During Bariatric Surgery.

Lidocaine has been shown to be clinically beneficial during bariatric surgery. However, information about lidocaine serum concentrations in this setting is scarce. This prospective clinical trial included 42 obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. They received lidocaine based on adjusted body weight. Administration began with a 1.5 mg·kg bolus of intravenous lidocaine followed by a continuous infusion of 2 mg·kg·hour. After skin closure, administration was decreased to 1 mg·kg·hour until discharge from the recovery room. No serum concentrations of lidocaine were outside the usual accepted range (1.5-5 µg·mL).

Truncal regional nerve blocks in clinical anesthesia practice.

Regional anesthetic techniques are important components of successful multimodal analgesic strategies. When used successfully, truncal nerve blocks of the chest wall, abdomen, and, paraneuraxial nerves, in combination with other analgesic modalities, may offer similar analgesic efficacy as neuraxial techniques, which are associated with a greater risk profile. Moreover, in comparison to neuraxial techniques, truncal nerve blocks are relatively simple to perform and technically straightforward to learn. The transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block is often incorporated into the multimodal analgesia regimen for surgical patients undergoing various abdominal and gynecological procedures. Rectus sheath blocks (RSB) were originally introduced to help relax the anterior abdominal wall during surgery and as an adjunct pain therapy. With the advancement of technology and the development of ultrasound guided techniques, RSB now have a more ubiquitous role and have been shown to decrease postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Different variations of the quadratus lumborum block may provide visceral and sensory analgesic coverage. Moreover, truncal blocks, including ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, pectoralis nerve (PECS) blocks, serratus anterior, intercostal, and erector spinae plane blocks, have gained routine clinical use for various surgeries. In this review, we discuss the techniques, anatomy, indications, complications, and benefits of truncal nerve blocks commonly used in clinical practice.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Using Manual Bolus Atomization Versus Micropump Nebulization and Morphine Requirements in Young Children.

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of local anesthetics is used in adults and children for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic surgery. Population pharmacokinetics (PK) of IP bupivacaine has not been determined in children. Objectives of this study were (1) to develop a population PK model to compare IP bupivacaine administered via manual bolus atomization and micropump nebulization and (2) to assess postoperative morphine requirements after intraoperative administration. We hypothesized similar PK profiles and morphine requirements for both delivery methods. METHODS: This was a prospective, sequential, observational study. After institutional review board (IRB) approval and written informed parental consent, 67 children 6 months to 6 years of age undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic urological surgery received IP bupivacaine at the beginning of surgery. Children received a total dose of 1.25 mg/kg bupivacaine, either diluted in 30-mL normal saline via manual bolus atomization over 30 seconds or undiluted bupivacaine 0.5% via micropump nebulization into carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation tubing over 10-17.4 minutes. Venous blood samples were obtained at 4 time points between 1 and 120 minutes intraoperatively. Samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry. PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental and compartmental analyses. Nonlinear regression modeling was used to estimate PK parameters (primary outcomes) and Mann-Whitney U test for morphine requirements (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Patient characteristics between the 2 delivery methods were comparable. No clinical signs of neurotoxicity or cardiotoxicity were observed. The range of peak plasma concentrations was 0.39-2.44 µg/mL for the manual bolus atomization versus 0.25-1.07 µg/mL for the micropump nebulization. IP bupivacaine PK was described by a 1-compartment model for both delivery methods. Bupivacaine administration by micropump nebulization resulted in a significantly lower Highest Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) and shorter time to reach Cmax (Tmax) (P < .001) compared to manual bolus atomization. Lower plasma concentrations with less interpatient variability were observed and predicted by the PK model for the micropump nebulization (P < .001). Adjusting for age, weight, and sex as covariates, Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) were significantly lower with micropump nebulization (P < .001). Regardless of the delivery method, morphine requirements were low at all time points. There were no differences in cumulative postoperative intravenous/oral morphine requirements between manual bolus atomization and micropump nebulization (0.14 vs 0.17 mg/kg; P = .85) measured up to 24 hours postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: IP bupivacaine administration by micropump nebulization demonstrated lower plasma concentrations, less interpatient variability, low risk of toxicity, and similar clinical efficacy compared to manual bolus atomization. This is the first population PK study of IP bupivacaine in children, motivating future randomized controlled trials to determine efficacy.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine Following Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Elderly Patients.

BACKGROUND: Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is an increasingly popular analgesic technique in elderly patients with hip fracture. Despite requiring large volumes of local anaesthetic, there are no plasma pharmacokinetic data on FICB in elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of a levobupivacaine 75 mg (30 mL 0.25%) FICB dose in patients aged ≥ 80 years with fractured femur. METHODS: This was a single-arm descriptive pilot study. Twelve adults aged ≥ 80 years with hip fracture received FICB performed under ultrasound guidance. Venous blood was sampled at 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 and 240 min after injection. Total plasma levobupivacaine concentration was measured by mass spectrometry. The main outcome measures were pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) Cmax was 0.82 µg/mL (0.47-1.03). tmax was 45 min (41:20-60:00). No evidence of toxicity was identified. Plasma levobupivacaine concentrations were below the threshold associated with toxicity in younger, healthy patients (2.6 µg/mL). No association was found between individual patient Cmax and α1-acid glycoprotein, weight or body mass index, although the study was not powered for these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Absorption of levobupivacaine was slow and all patients had plasma concentrations below the toxic threshold. This pharmacokinetic analysis concludes that the technique appears to be well-tolerated and efficacious at reducing pain and is associated with systemic plasma concentrations unlikely to be associated with major adverse effects in elderly patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN27364035 (UK Clinical Trials Gateway).

Poisoning associated with inappropriate use of a eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine before laser-assisted hair removal: about 3 cases.

BACKGROUND: Eutectic mixtures of lidocaine and prilocaine are used during painful dermatological procedures. Poisoning is rarely reported in adults. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We report three cases of women who experienced lidocaine and prilocaine poisoning after laser-assisted hair removal. Plasma levels of local anesthetics were assayed by a fully validated liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. CASE REPORTS: The rules of application of the anesthetic cream were observed apart from the maximum dose and/or maximum surface area. One patient applied a higher dose than the maximum recommended dose (140 instead of 60 g) and all patients failed to comply with the maximum recommended surface area (600 cm2). The patients presented an unusual clinical pattern as compared with other local anesthetics overdose: signs of cardiac toxicity with no ECG changes or arrhythmia, neurological toxicity without seizures or coma, and methemoglobinemia. DISCUSSION: Health authorities should publish explicit recommendations targeting users and prescribers with particular emphasis on the maximal surface area of application.

Inhibitory effect of lidocaine on colonic spasm during colonoscopy: A multicenter double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Colonic spasm can interfere with colonoscopy, but antispasmodic agents can cause complications. This study aimed to assess the inhibitory effect of topical lidocaine compared with a placebo control. METHODS: In five tertiary-care hospitals in Japan, 128 patients requiring endoscopic resection of a colorectal lesion were enrolled and randomly and double-blindly allocated to colonoscopy with topical administration of 2% lidocaine solution 20mL (LID, n = 64) or normal saline 20mL (control, n = 64). During colonoscopy, the assigned solution was applied with a spray catheter near the lesion and the area was observed for three minutes. primary endpoint was the inhibitory effect at three time-points (1, 2 and 3 minutes after dispersion), using a three-point scale (excellent, fair, poor). Secondary endpoints were rebound spasm and adverse events. All endpoints were scored in real time. Serum lidocaine levels were measured in 32 patients (LID 16, control 16). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in patient demographics. At all time-points, the proportion of patients with "excellent" scores was greater in LID group than control group, with significant differences observed at 2 minutes (p = 0.02) and 3 minutes (p = 0.02). In LID group, the rate of "excellent" scores increased by 12.5% at 2 minutes and was maintained at 3 minutes. Rebound spasm did not occur in LID group, compared with 15.6% of control group (p = 0.001). There were no adverse events in LID group. All serum lidocaine levels were below detectable levels. CONCLUSIONS: Topical lidocaine is an effective and safe method for suppressing colorectal spasm during colonoscopy (UMIN000024733).

Periarticular Knee Injection With Liposomal Bupivacaine and Continuous Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Local periarticular infiltration (PAI) analgesia has emerged as an important component of multimodal approaches to treat total knee arthroplasty postoperative pain. Liposomal bupivacaine may provide prolonged analgesic duration when injected into the surrounding tissues. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and serum bupivacaine levels of a continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) with bupivacaine to PAI with liposomal bupivacaine. METHODS: Sixty-five patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized into 2 groups: (1) CFNB and PAI with bupivacaine (CFNB group) or (2) PAI with bupivacaine:liposomal bupivacaine mixture at the end of surgery (LB group). The primary outcome was pain intensity at maximum knee flexion 24 hours following surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain intensities at rest and movement at timed intervals and serum bupivacaine levels. RESULTS: Patients in the CFNB group experienced lower pain scores at maximum knee flexion at 24 hours (7.91; 95% confidence interval, 7.19-8.61) compared to the LB group (8.95; 95% confidence interval, 8.42-9.48; P = .02). The mean peak serum bupivacaine level in the LB group up to 72 hours was 0.55 µg/mL versus 1.4 µg/mL for CFNB group (P = .0008) with one patient in the CFNB group exceeding the reported minimum serum bupivacaine threshold for toxicity. CONCLUSION: While similar pain control was observed on the day of surgery for both groups, patients with a CFNB experienced lower pain intensities during maximum knee flexion at 24 hours. Total serum concentrations in LB group remained below the toxicity threshold over the study period.

A preliminary study on plasma concentration achieved following intrapterygomandibular space injection of dexamethasone as a route of drug delivery with lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block-correlation of clinical effects.

PURPOSE: To determine the quantity of dexamethasone plasma concentration achieved following intrapterygomandibular space injection of dexamethasone when co-administered with inferior alveolar nerve block correlating with the clinical effects in the postoperative phase. OBJECTIVE: A preliminary prospective study to evaluate the dexamethasone plasma concentration achieved following intrapterygomandibular space injection of dexamethasone with 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block to achieve hemi-mandibular anesthesia for minor oral surgical procedures and derive clinical correlations. BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone is a glucocorticoid, chiefly used for the management of postsurgical sequelae like trismus and swelling in maxillofacial surgical practice. Conventionally, parenteral dexamethasone is administered via intravenous or intramuscular route. Intrapterygomandibular space injection is a novel route of steroid delivery described in literature. For minor oral surgical procedures in maxillofacial surgical practice requiring inferior alveolar nerve block, dexamethasone can be administered along with local anesthetic through a single injection as a mixture (twin mix). METHODS: Prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluative plasma concentration of dexamethasone achieved following injection of a freshly prepared mixture of 1.8 ml of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) and 1 ml (4 mg) dexamethasone [2.8 ml solution of twin mix] in the pterygomandibular space. The 30 candidates included for the trial were randomly split into three study groups (ten each)-(1) control group (C); (2) intramuscular group (IM); (3) intraspace group (IS). RESULTS: The mean plasma dexamethasone concentration at 30 min postinjection in group IM was 226.41 ± 48.67 ng/ml and for IS group it was 209.67 ± 88.13 ng/ml. Post hoc (Bonferroni-Holm test) intergroup comparison for plasma dexamethasone concentration (IM and IS) was found statistically insignificant (P = 0.605). CONCLUSION: Intraspace route of drug administration can be utilized to deliver dexamethasonized local anesthetics safely with predictable clinical effects in the patients requiring mandibular minor oral surgery under local anesthesia.

The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Oral Mucosal Blood Flow and the Absorption of Lidocaine.

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a sedative and analgesic agent that acts via the alpha-2 adrenoreceptor and is associated with reduced anesthetic requirements, as well as attenuated blood pressure and heart rate in response to stressful events. A previous study reported that cat gingival blood flow was controlled via sympathetic alpha-adrenergic fibers involved in vasoconstriction. In the present study, experiment 1 focused on the relationship between the effects of DEX on alpha adrenoreceptors and vasoconstriction in the tissues of the oral cavity and compared the palatal mucosal blood flow (PMBF) in rabbits between general anesthesia with sevoflurane and sedation with DEX. We found that the PMBF was decreased by DEX presumably because of the vasoconstriction of oral mucosal vessels following alpha-2 adrenoreceptor stimulation by DEX. To assess if this vasoconstriction would allow decreased use of locally administered epinephrine during DEX infusion, experiment 2 in the present study monitored the serum lidocaine concentration in rabbits to compare the absorption of lidocaine without epinephrine during general anesthesia with sevoflurane and sedation with DEX. The depression of PMBF by DEX did not affect the absorption of lidocaine. We hypothesize that this is because lidocaine dilates the blood vessels, counteracting the effects of DEX. In conclusion, despite decreased palatal blood flow with DEX infusion, local anesthetics with vasoconstrictors should be used in implant and oral surgery even with administered DEX.

Lipid Emulsion Pretreatment Decreased the Maximum Total and Free Plasma Concentration of Levobupivacaine for Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Block in Below-Knee Fracture Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although intravenous lipid emulsion has been proved a powerful antidote for local anesthetic toxicity, there are few pharmacokinetic data on using lipid infusion as a pretreatment for other clinical applications. We assessed the influence of lipid pretreatment on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine. METHODS: Altogether, 12 patients undergoing below-knee surgery for a fracture were randomly assigned to 2 groups (6 patients per group): pretreatment with 1.5 mL/kg lipid infusion (lipid group) or saline infusion (control subjects) followed by complete femoral and sciatic nerve block with 0.375% levobupivacaine (2.5 mg/kg). Total and free (non-protein bound) plasma levobupivacaine concentrations and triglycerides in the lipid group were determined. RESULTS: Results were given as means ± SD. Total and free maximum plasma levobupivacaine concentrations were lower in the lipid group than in control subjects (865 ± 98 vs 1145 ± 177 µg/L and 56.8 ± 7.5 vs 78.2 ± 13.7 µg/L, respectively; P < 0.01). Apparent volume of distribution and clearance were higher in the lipid group than in control subjects (211 ± 35 vs 170 ± 21 L and 35.1 ± 8.0 vs 25.8 ± 2.6 L/h, respectively; P < 0.05). Triglyceride level was significantly higher at the end of lipid infusion than baseline values (7.59 ± 1.32 vs 1.34 ± 0.39 mmol/L; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lipid pretreatment increased the apparent volume of distribution and clearance and decreased the maximum total and free levobupivacaine concentrations, thus offering a reasonable explanation for the effects of lipids on local anesthesia-related toxicity in humans. Rapid lipid infusion induced hypertriglyceridemia without other apparent risks in this study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier ChiCTR-TRC-14005203.

Ropivacaine Wound Infiltration for Pain Management After Breast Cancer Mastectomy: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis.

Ropivacaine continuous wound infusions (CWIs) are extensively used as a component of multimodal analgesia. The rational application of CWI of ropivacaine requires a thorough understanding of its pharmacokinetics to investigate the risk of potential systemic toxicity. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) study was undertaken to describe the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine CWI during 75 hours. Women undergoing a unilateral mastectomy were scheduled to receive CWI for 40 hours for postoperative analgesia. A 10-mL ropivacaine 0.75% bolus followed by continuous infusion (400 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine at a flow rate of 10 mL/h) was administered via a multihole catheter placed on the major pectoral muscle. PopPK analysis was performed using the nonlinear mixed-effects model. A 1-compartment disposition model with an absorption compartment and a transit compartment for the infusion best describes the data (67 observations from 10 women). Population parameter estimates (between-subject variability, %) are apparent central volume (V/F) 269 L (39.1%), apparent clearance (CL/F) 18.8 h-1 (74.9%), and absorption rate (K12) 0.406 h-1 . The model predicted Cmax as 1.45 ± 0.80 µg/mL, which occurred in the 42.4th hour (39-45.9 hours). This popPK model describes the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine during continuous wound infusion and confirms the safety profile of the present technique.

Blood concentration of bupivacaine and duration of sensory and motor block following ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks in dogs.

Peripheral nerve blocks are becoming increasingly popular for perioperative use as anesthetics and analgesics in small animals. This prospective study was performed to investigate the duration of motor and sensory blockade following use of bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks in dogs and to measure the plasma concentrations of bupivacaine that result from these procedures. Six dogs were anesthetized twice using a randomized cross-over design. At the first anesthetic, dogs were assigned to receive either an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block or sciatic nerve block with 0.15 mL kg-1 of bupivacaine 0.5%. Two months later, the other nerve block was performed during a second anesthetic. At 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 and 60 minutes after injection, arterial blood samples were collected for laboratory measurement of bupivacaine. After 60 minutes, dogs were recovered from anesthesia. Starting at two hours post-injection, video-recordings of the dogs were made every two hours for 24 hours. The videos were randomized and the degree of motor and sensory blockade was evaluated using a three-point scoring system (0 = no effect, 1 = mild effect, 2 = complete blockade) by two blinded assessors. The median (range) times to full recovery from motor blockade were 11 (6-14) hours (femoral) and 12 (4-18) hours (sciatic), and 15 (10-18) hours (femoral) and 10 (4-12) hours (sciatic) for sensory blockade. There were no differences in the median times to functional recovery for the two techniques. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine were no different following the blocks and were less than 0.78 µg mL-1 at all times. These results suggest that these ultrasound-guided nerve blocks do not result in potentially toxic systemic levels of local anesthetic and that their duration of action is useful for providing anesthesia and analgesia for pelvic limb procedures.

A study on reducing the absorption of lidocaine from the airway in cats.

PURPOSE:: To determine if the combination of lidocaine with epinephrine or gamma globulin would decrease the rate or reduce the amount of local absorption of lidocaine through the airway. METHODS:: Twenty adult male cats were randomly and evenly distributed into four groups: 1) Group LG: lidocaine administered with gamma globulin; 2) Group LS: lidocaine administered with physiological saline); 3) Group LE: lidocaine administered with epinephrine; 4) Group C: control group. Invasive blood pressure, heart rate, and concentration of lidocaine were recorded before and after administration. RESULTS:: The peak of plasma concentrations appeared difference (Group LG: 1.39 ± 0.23 mg/L; Group LS: 1.47 ± 0.29 mg/L and Group LE: 0.99 ± 0.08 mg/L). Compared to Group C, there were significant differences in the average heart rate of Groups LG, LS, and LE (P < 0.05). The average systolic blood pressures were significantly different when each group was compared to Group C (P < 0.05). The biological half-life, AUC0-120, peak time, and half-life of absorption among the three groups have not presented statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION:: Administering lidocaine in combination with gamma globulin through airway causes significant decrease the rate and reduce the amount of local absorption of lidocaine in cats.

A study on reducing the absorption of lidocaine from the airway in cats

Abstract Purpose: To determine if the combination of lidocaine with epinephrine or gamma globulin would decrease the rate or reduce the amount of local absorption of lidocaine through the airway. Methods: Twenty adult male cats were randomly and evenly distributed into four groups: 1) Group LG: lidocaine administered with gamma globulin; 2) Group LS: lidocaine administered with physiological saline); 3) Group LE: lidocaine administered with epinephrine; 4) Group C: control group. Invasive blood pressure, heart rate, and concentration of lidocaine were recorded before and after administration. Results: The peak of plasma concentrations appeared difference (Group LG: 1.39 ± 0.23 mg/L; Group LS: 1.47 ± 0.29 mg/L and Group LE: 0.99 ± 0.08 mg/L). Compared to Group C, there were significant differences in the average heart rate of Groups LG, LS, and LE (P < 0.05). The average systolic blood pressures were significantly different when each group was compared to Group C (P < 0.05). The biological half-life, AUC0-120, peak time, and half-life of absorption among the three groups have not presented statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Administering lidocaine in combination with gamma globulin through airway causes significant decrease the rate and reduce the amount of local absorption of lidocaine in cats.