Appropriate timing for the removal of urinary catheters in gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether early urinary catheter removal is feasible during epidural anesthesia during gastrointestinal surgery in male patients at high risk for urinary retention. METHODS: Male patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric or colon cancer were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups: the early group, in which the urinary catheter was removed before removal of the epidural catheter on the second or third postoperative day, and the late group, in which the urinary catheter was removed after removal of the epidural catheter. The randomization adjustment factors were age (≥ 65 or < 65 years) and operative site (gastric or colon). The primary endpoint was urinary retention. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of urinary tract infection and length of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were enrolled between March 2020 and February 2024 and assigned to the Early (n = 37) and Late (n = 36) groups. Four patients withdrew their consent after randomization. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that urinary retention occurred in 4 patients (11.1%) in the early group and 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group (P = 0.20). Urinary tract infection occurred in 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days in both groups. CONCLUSION: Early urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia could increase urinary retention within the expected acceptable range. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000040468, Date of registration: May 21, 2020.

Bupivacaine pleural effusion mimicking a hemothorax after a thoracoscopic microdiscectomy with epidural anesthesia.

PURPOSE: Post-operative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is often treated using thoracic epidural analgesics or thoracic paravertebral analgesics. This article describes a case where a thoracic disc herniation is treated with a thoracoscopic microdiscectomy with post-operative thoracic epidural analgesics. The patient developed a bupivacaine pleural effusion which mimicked a hemothorax on computed tomography (CT). METHODS: The presence of bupivacaine in the pleural effusion was confirmed using a high performance liquid chromatography method. RESULTS: The patient underwent a re-exploration to relieve the pleural effusion. The patient showed a long-term recovery similar to what can be expected from an uncomplicated thoracoscopic microdiscectomy. CONCLUSION: A pleural effusion may occur when thoracic epidural analgesics are used in patents with a corridor between the pleural cavity and epidural space.

Determining the Maximum Tolerable Concentration of Ropivacaine to Maintain Sensation of the Nerve Root in Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy: Can Epidural Anaesthesia Achieve Pain-Tactile Separation Block to Avoid Nerve Injury?

Introduction: Nerve injury is a serious complication of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy due to nerve root contact. The maximum tolerable concentration (MTC) of ropivacaine concentration for epidural anaesthesia, is defined as the concentration that minimises pain while preserving the sensation of the nerve roots. This distinct advantage allows the patient to provide feedback to the surgeon when the nerve roots are contacted. Methods: We used a biased-coin design to determine the MTC, which was estimated by the 10% effective concentration (EC10), ie, the concentration at which 10% of patients lost sensation in the nerve roots. The determinant for positive response was lack of sensory feedback upon contact with the nerve root, and the feedback from occurrence of sensations in the innervation area upon contact with the nerve root was defined as a negative response. Primary outcome was the response from contact nerve root. Secondary outcomes were the type and number of statements of negative response and each patient's pain score during surgery. Results: Fifty-four patients were included in this study. The EC10 was 0.434% (95% CI: 0.410%, 0.440%) using isotonic regression in comparison with 0.431% (95% CI: 0.399%, 0.444%) using probit regression. Three type statements of negative response were reported including "tactile sensation", radiculalgia, and numbness. Conclusion: The MTC of ropivacaine used for epidural anaesthesia was 0.434% to avoid nerve injury in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy.

Anterior spinal cord syndrome from a spinal epidural hematoma following removal of an epidural catheter.

PURPOSE: Spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) is a rare yet significant complication associated with neuraxial anesthesia. Here, we present the case of a 74-yr-old male who underwent open repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Following the removal of an epidural catheter, the patient developed anterior spinal cord syndrome due to an SEH despite having a normal coagulation profile. CLINICAL FEATURES: This patient's neurologic presentation was marked by a loss of motor function while maintaining fine touch sensation distal to the spinal cord injury. Initial truncal computed tomography (CT) angiography failed to detect vascular compromise or diagnose the SEH. Subsequently, delayed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a multilevel thoracic epidural hematoma, spinal cord infarction, and ischemia. Immediate surgical decompression was performed, but unfortunately, the patient had a poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Anterior spinal cord syndrome (ASCS) represents an uncommon neurologic manifestation of SEH, which is typically characterized by a triad of back pain and sensory and motor deficits. Although the initial CT scan was necessary to diagnose the postvascular surgery complication, it did not immediately detect the SEH. In cases of ASCS subsequent to thoracic epidural placement and removal, MRI is the preferred imaging modality for precise diagnosis and assessment of the need for surgical intervention. Despite adherence to anticoagulation guidelines, patients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia may face an elevated risk of developing SEH. Health care professionals should remain vigilant in monitoring for neurologic abnormalities following epidural catheter insertion or removal, particularly in the context of vascular surgery.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'hématome péridural rachidien est une complication rare mais importante associée à l'anesthésie neuraxiale. Nous présentons ici le cas d'un homme de 74 ans qui a bénéficié d'une réparation ouverte d'un anévrisme de l'aorte abdominale. Après le retrait d'un cathéter péridural, le patient a développé un syndrome médullaire antérieur dû à un hématome péridural rachidien malgré un profil de coagulation normal. CARACTéRISTIQUES CLINIQUES: La présentation neurologique de ce patient était marquée par une perte de la fonction motrice tout en conservant une sensation de toucher fine distale à la lésion médullaire. L'angiographie initiale par tomodensitométrie (TDM) n'a pas permis de détecter d'atteinte vasculaire ni de diagnostiquer un hématome péridural rachidien. Par la suite, une imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM) retardée a révélé un hématome péridural thoracique à plusieurs niveaux, un infarctus médullaire et une ischémie. Une décompression chirurgicale immédiate a été réalisée, mais malheureusement, l'issue a été mauvaise pour le patient. CONCLUSION: Le syndrome médullaire antérieur représente une manifestation neurologique peu fréquente de l'hématome péridural rachidien, qui se caractérise généralement par une triade de maux de dos et de déficits sensoriels et moteurs. Bien que la tomodensitométrie initiale ait été nécessaire pour diagnostiquer la complication chirurgicale post-vasculaire, elle n'a pas immédiatement détecté l'hématome péridural rachidien. Dans les cas de syndromes médullaires antérieurs consécutifs à la pose et au retrait d'un cathéter péridural thoracique, l'IRM est la modalité d'imagerie privilégiée pour un diagnostic précis et une évaluation de la nécessité d'une intervention chirurgicale. Malgré le respect des directives d'anticoagulation, les patient·es bénéficiant d'une anesthésie neuraxiale peuvent faire face à un risque élevé de développer un hématome péridural rachidien. Les professionnel·les de la santé doivent demeurer vigilant·es dans le monitorage des anomalies neurologiques à la suite de l'insertion ou du retrait d'un cathéter péridural, en particulier dans le contexte d'une chirurgie vasculaire.

Epidural Catheterization in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Risk Assessment of Epidural Hematoma.

ABSTRACT: The potential benefits of epidural anesthesia on mortality, atrial fibrillation, and pulmonary complications must be weighed against the risk of epidural hematoma associated with intraoperative heparinization. This study aims to provide an updated assessment of the clinical risks of epidural anesthesia in cardiac surgery, focusing on the occurrence of epidural hematomas and subsequent paralysis. A systematic search of Embase, Medline, Ovid Central, Web of Science, and PubMed was conducted to identify relevant publications between 1966 and 2022. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of the retrieved manuscripts. Studies reporting adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with epidural catheterization were included. The incidence of hematomas was calculated by dividing the number of hematomas by the total number of patients in the included studies. Risk calculations utilized various denominators based on the rigor of trial designs, and the risks of hematoma and paralysis were compared to other commonly encountered risks. The analysis included a total of 33,089 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with epidural catheterization. No epidural hematomas were reported across all published RCTs, prospective, and retrospective trials. Four case reports associated epidural hematoma with epidural catheterization and perioperative heparinization. The risks of epidural hematoma and subsequent paralysis were estimated at 1:7643 (95% CI 1:3860 to 380,916) and 1:10,190 (95% CI 1:4781 to 0:1), respectively. The risk of hematoma is similar to the non-obstetric population (1:5405; 95% CI 1:4784 to 6134). The risk of hematoma in cardiac surgery patients receiving epidural anesthesia is therefore similar to that observed in some other surgical non-obstetric populations commonly exposed to epidural catheterization.

Incomplete sensorimotor paresis after upper abdominal surgery with TEA and spinal epidural lipomatosis: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: This case report documents a postoperative, incomplete sensorimotor paraparesis from thoracic vertebral body 6 (Th6) after combined anesthesia for upper abdominal surgery in a patient who had a thoracic localization of spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL). CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was treated in our clinic with a thoracic epidural catheter (TEA) for perioperative analgesia during a partial duodenopancreatectomy. Paraparetic symptoms occurred 20 hours after surgery. Initial MRI did not show bleeding, infection or spinal cord damage and the neurosurgeon consultants recommended observation. The neurological examination and the third follow-up MRI on 15th postoperative day showed ventrolateral damage of the spinal cord at level Th6. It is possible that local anesthetic compressed the spinal cord in addition to the existing lipomatosis and the thoracic kyphosis. The paraparesis improved during follow-up paraplegiologic treatment. CONCLUSION: So far, only two uncomplicated lumbar epidural catheter anesthesias have been described in patients who had a lumbar SEL. Epidural catheter anesthesia is a safe and effective method of pain control. But it is important to carefully identify and stratify patients with risk factors during the premedication visit. In patients who had kyphosis and thoracic localization of SEL, TEA may only be used after a risk-benefit assessment.

The Effect of Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia on Shoulder Pain in Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Hernia Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is a condition that seriously discomforts patients and develops caused by a peritoneal tear in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) surgeries. Although surgeons generally prefer general anesthesia for the TEP technique, many studies have been carried out on the use of regional anesthesia in recent years. In our study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined spinal/epidural anesthesia (CSEA) method to prevent shoulder pain in the TEP technique. METHODS: The patients who operated with the TEP procedure were divided into 2 groups; SA (group 1) and CSEA (group 2). The 2 patient groups were compared in terms of sex, age, body mass index, duration of surgery, total operation time, patient satisfaction, pain scores, length of hospital stay, adverse effects, intraoperative, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The number of patients in group 1 was 42 and group 2 was 40. The mean operation time was recorded as 55.9 and 80.2 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively, which was statistically significantly shorter in group 1 ( P <0.001). Postoperative pain was significantly less in group 2 for the 4th hour ( P <0.0001) and the 12th hour ( P =0.047). There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of peritoneal tear ( P =0.860). Intraoperative and postoperative shoulder pain was significantly less in group 2 ( P =0.038, P =0015, respectively). CONCLUSION: CSEA is an effective and safe anesthesia method for preventing shoulder pain that develops after TEP surgeries.

Subdural spinal haematoma after epidural anaesthesia.

Epidural anaesthesia is widely used in major thoracic and abdominal surgery for postoperative analgesia. Spinal haematoma after epidural anaesthesia in patients without risk factors is very rare. Most of the reported spinal haematomas arose in the epidural space, whereas the subdural localization seen in this case is very uncommon.We report a case of spinal subdural haematoma after difficult and repeated placement of an epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia. As no sensorimotor deficit of the lower limb arose, we refrained from immediate neurosurgical decompression and the patient recovered fully in the course. Nevertheless, any kind of spinal haematoma is a serious complication we should always be aware of. Prompt detection of clinical symptoms such as sensory or motor deficit is most important. Further diagnostic steps and treatment should not be delayed to avoid permanent neurological deficits.

Tarlov cyst with self-healing cauda equina syndrome following combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) after Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia (CSEA) is a rare disease that most of the time need surgery to relieve spinal cord compression. CASE PRESENTATION: A 34-year-old male patient underwent a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) under CSEA. Anesthesia and surgery were uneventful. However, the patient gradually experienced urinary retention, lower abdomen and back pain, changes in bowel habits and neurological dysfunction of the lower limbs when the catheter was removed. It was later determined that the patient had Tarlov cyst at the left S1 level in the sacral canal. Finally, the patient completely recovered 20 days after drug conservative therapy onset. CONCLUSION: This case suggests that CES might occur even after ordinary CSEA. The risk factors are drug neurotoxicity to ropivacaine and Tarlov cyst, which helped to accumulate ropivacaine. The development of ultrasound-guided CSEA and an ultrasound atlas of the spinal canal are required.

Association of Tarlov cyst with cauda equina syndrome and spinal cord infarction following caudal epidural block: A case report.

RATIONALE: Caudal epidural block (CEB), which injects drugs into the epidural space through a sacral hiatus, is considered a safer alternative to other approaches. Serious complications, such as cauda equina syndrome or spinal cord infarction, have been reported very rarely, but their coexistence after CEB, which may be related to the ruptured perineural cyst, also known as a Tarlov cyst, was not reported. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 40-year-old male patient presented with bilateral lower extremity radicular pain. CEB was performed without image guidance. The patient exhibited sensory deficits below L2, no motor function (0-grade), hypotonic deep tendon reflexes, and no pathological reflexes. DIAGNOSES: Spinal cord infarction, cauda equina syndrome, and sacral level perineural cyst with hemorrhage. INTERVENTION: High doses of steroids and rehabilitation were performed. OUTCOMES: The patient was discharged after 28 days with persistent bilateral leg paralysis and sensory deficits below the L2 level. The patient demonstrated no neurological improvement. LESSONS: Magnetic resonance imaging, including the sacral area, should be performed before performing CEB, to confirm the presence of a perineural cyst.

Intraoperative nociception and postoperative inflammation associated with the suppression of major complications due to thoracic epidural block after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma under general anesthesia: A retrospective observational study.

A recent study showed that thoracic epidural block (TEB) suppressed the occurrence of major complications after pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) under general anesthesia. To investigate the mechanisms underlying the correlation, both acute inflammatory status and intraoperative nociception were evaluated in the present study. In a single-institutional observational study, consecutive adult patients undergoing P/D were enrolled from March 2019 to April 2022. Perioperative acute inflammatory status was evaluated using differential White blood cell (WBC) counts and serum concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) both before and after the surgery on postoperative day (POD) 1. The averaged value of nociceptive response index during surgery (mean NR) was obtained to evaluate the level of intraoperative nociception. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between perioperative variables and major complications Postoperative major postoperative complication was defined as Clavien-Dindo grades ≥ III. We conducted this study with 97 patients. After logistic regression analysis showed that general anesthesia without TEB was a sole risk factor for major complications, patients were divided into 2 groups: general anesthesia with and without TEB. The incidence of major complications was significantly lower in patients with TEB (33.3%, n = 33) than in those without TEB (64.1%, n = 64, P < .01). Although there was no significant difference in the CRP level between 2 groups, the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) on POD 1 in patients with TEB was significantly higher than that in patients without TEB (P = .04). The mean NR was significantly lower in patients with TEB than that in those without TEB (P = .02). Both lower mean NR during surgery and higher LMR on POD 1 are likely associated the suppression of major complications due to TEB after P/D under general anesthesia. Decreases in the postoperative acute inflammatory response, caused by the reduction of intraoperative nociception due to TEB, may help suppress major complications after P/D.

A Review of the Paravertebral Block: Benefits and Complications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Paravertebral nerve blocks (PVB) have experienced a surge over the past 2 decades as improved access to ultrasound has increased ease of performance. The purpose of this review is to identify recent findings with regard to PVB's uses, including benefits, risks, and recommendations. RECENT FINDINGS: PVB is reported as an effective method of analgesia both in intraoperative and postoperative applications, with novel applications showing its potential to replace general anesthesia for certain procedures. The use of PVB as a method of analgesia postoperatively has shown lower opioid usage and faster PACU discharge, when compared to alternative approaches like the intercostal nerve block, erector spinae plane block, pectoralis II block, and patient-controlled analgesia. Thoracic epidural analgesia and a serratus anterior plane block are comparable to PVB and can be used as alternatives. The incidence of adverse events is consistently reported to be very low with few new risks being identified as the use of PVB expands. While there are worthwhile alternatives to PVB, it is an excellent option to consider, particularly for higher-risk patients. For patients undergoing thoracic or breast surgery, PVB can improve opioid usage and shorten the length of stay leading to an overall positive impact on patient recovery and satisfaction. More research is needed to further expand novel applications.

Current status of the combined spinal-epidural technique in obstetrics and surgery.

Epidural and spinal blocks are well-accepted neuraxial techniques but both have several disadvantages. Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) can combine the best features of both techniques and reduce or eliminate these disadvantages. It provides the rapidity, density, and reliability of subarachnoid block with the flexibility of catheter epidural technique to extend the duration of anesthesia/analgesia (and to improve spinal block). It is an excellent technique for determining minimum intrathecal drug doses. Although most commonly employed in obstetric practice, CSE is also used in a wide variety of non-obstetric surgical procedures including orthopedic, vascular, gynecological, urological, and general surgical procedures. The needle-through-needle technique remains the most commonly used method to perform CSE. Several technical variations including Sequential CSE and Epidural Volume Extention (EVE) are commonly used particularly in obstetric and high-risk patients such as those with cardiac disease where a slower onset of sympathetic block is desirable. The risks of complications such as epidural catheter migration through the dural hole, neurological complications, and subarachnoid spread of epidurally administered drugs are possible but have not been a clinically relevant problem in the 40+ years of their existence. In obstetrics, CSE is used for labor pain because it produces rapid-onset analgesia with reduced local anesthetic consumption and less motor block. The epidural catheter placed as part of a CSE is more reliable than a catheter placed as part of a conventional epidural. Less breakthrough pain throughout labor is noted and fewer catheters require replacing. Side effects of CSE include greater potential for hypotension and more fetal heart rate abnormalities. CSE is also used for cesarean delivery. The main purpose is to decrease the spinal dose so that spinal-induced hypotension can be reduced. However, reducing the spinal dose requires an epidural catheter to avoid intra-operative pain when surgery is prolonged.

Opioid-Free Versus Opioid-Based Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain After Thoracoscopic Surgery: The Use of Intravenous and Epidural Esketamine.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and safety of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) regimens in distinct types of surgeries remain controversial. In this study, we investigated whether OFA could reduce the occurrence of chronic postoperative pain in patients receiving video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). METHODS: We conducted a 2-center, randomized, controlled trial from September 2021 to January 2022. A total of 162 lung tumor patients scheduled to undergo VATS were randomly divided into an opioid-based anesthesia (OA) group and an OFA group. The OA group received general anesthesia combined with thoracic epidural block using morphine, while the OFA group received general anesthesia combined with thoracic epidural block using esketamine. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) was used after surgery (ropivacaine and morphine for the OA group versus ropivacaine and esketamine for the OFA group). The primary end point was chronic pain rates at 3 months after VATS, which were analyzed using a logistic regression model. The secondary end points were chronic pain rates at 6 months, acute pain rates at 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively, postoperative side effects, and perioperative variables. RESULTS: The final analysis included 159 patients. Acute postoperative pain at 24 hours occurred in 0 of the 79 (0%) patients in the OA group and 10 of the 80 (17.5%) patients in the OFA group (odds ratio, 52.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.47-420.10; P < .001). Acute postoperative pain at 48 hours occurred in 3 of the 79 (3.8%) patients in the OA group and 2 of the 80 (2.5%) patients in the OFA group (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.99-4.32; P = .053). In this study, none of the patients had moderate or severe pain in either group at 3 and 6 months postsurgically. Mild chronic postoperative pain at 3 months occurred in 27 of the 79 (34.2%) patients in the OA group and 14 of the 80 (17.5%) patients in the OFA group (odds ratio, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.49-8.31; P = .004). At 6 months, mild chronic pain still occurred in 23 of the 79 (29.1%) patients in the OA group and 9 of the 80 (11.3%) patients in the OFA group (odds ratio, 5.55; 95% CI, 2.01-15.33; P = .001). In addition, the OFA group included fewer patients with side effects, including nausea, vomiting, and pruritus, within 48 hours after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of opioids by esketamine, intraoperatively as intravenous injection and epidural infusion and postoperatively as epidural infusion, reduces the incidence of mild chronic postoperative pain and side effects in patients after VATS.

Spinal Cord Injury and Complications Related to Neuraxial Anaesthesia Procedures: A Systematic Review.

The use of neuraxial procedures, such as spinal and epidural anaesthesia, has been linked to some possible complications. In addition, spinal cord injuries due to anaesthetic practice (Anaes-SCI) are rare events but remain a significant concern for many patients undergoing surgery. This systematic review aimed to identify high-risk patients summarise the causes, consequences, and management/recommendations of SCI due to neuraxial techniques in anaesthesia. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted in accordance with Cochrane recommendations, and inclusion criteria were applied to identify relevant studies. From the 384 studies initially screened, 31 were critically appraised, and the data were extracted and analysed. The results of this review suggest that the main risk factors reported were extremes of age, obesity, and diabetes. Anaes-SCI was reported as a consequence of hematoma, trauma, abscess, ischemia, and infarction, among others. As a result, mainly motor deficits, sensory loss, and pain were reported. Many authors reported delayed treatments to resolve Anaes-SCI. Despite the potential complications, neuraxial techniques are still one of the best options for opioid-sparing pain prevention and management, reducing patients' morbidity, improving outcomes, reducing the length of hospital stay, and pain chronification, with a consequent economic benefit. The main findings of this review highlight the importance of careful patient management and close monitoring during neuraxial anaesthesia procedures to minimise the risk of spinal cord injury and complications.

Neuraxial anesthesia in hepato-pancreatic-bilio surgery: a first western pilot study of 46 patients.

The most common anesthetic approach in hepato-pancreatic-biliary (HPB) surgery is general anesthesia (GA), but it may result in increased morbidity and mortality and peri-operative risks especially in frail patients. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of neuraxial anesthesia (NA) in HPB in a pilot clinical series. This analysis was conducted on 46 consecutive patients undergoing HPB surgery in an Italian Tertial referral center. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA), combined spino-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and peridural anesthesia (PA) were used in major and minor hepatectomies and bilio-pancreatic surgery instead of GA. NA was evaluated by analyzing the surgical and anesthesiological short-term outcomes. 46 patients were considered eligible for the study between February 2018 and May 2020. The average age was 69.07 (± 9.95) years. 22 were males and 24 were females. According to the ASA score, 19 (41.30%) patients had ASA II, 22 (47.83%) had ASA III and 5 (10.87%) had ASA IV. 22 (47.83%) patients underwent CSA, 20 (43.48%) CSEA and 4 (8.69%) PA. We performed 8 major and 19 minor hepatectomies, 7 bilio-digestive derivations, 5 Whipple procedures, 4 iatrogenic biliary duct injuries, 2 splenopancreatectomies and 1 hepatic cyst fenestration. Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 was observed in 3 patients. The conversion rate to endotracheal intubation occurring in 3 of 46 (6.52%) patients. After surgery, no local or pulmonary complications and delirium were reported in our series. The present study demonstrates that NA is a safe and feasible option in selected patients, if performed in referral centers by well-trained anaesthesiologists and surgeons.

Impact of Spinal/Epidural Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To compare impact of different anesthesia techniques on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Both general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia/epidural anesthesia can be used for lumbar spine surgery. There is still much controversy that which anesthesia technique is much more suitable for lumbar spine surgery with less complications, general anesthesia or regional anesthesia. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), PubMed, and Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials and independent reviewers assessed eligibility for included studies. Primary outcomes included incidences of intraoperative hypertension, hypotension, tachycardia, and bradycardia. Secondary outcomes included postoperative analgesic requirement, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), headache, urinary retention, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials consisting of 733 adult patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery were included. Spinal anesthesia/epidural anesthesia group had significant lower incidences of intraoperative hypertension [odds ratio (OR), 0.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.08-0.38; P <0.00001; I2 =0.0%] and tachycardia (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.79; P =0.006; I2 =0.0%), analgesic requirement in postanesthesia care unit (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08-0.22; P <0.00001; I2 =0.0%), PONV within 24 hours after surgery (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.46; P <0.00001; I2 =6.0%), and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (mean difference, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.18; P <0.00001; I2 =32.0%). There were no significant differences in incidences of intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia, PONV in postanesthesia care unit, analgesic requirement, urinary retention, and headache within 24 hours after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Low to moderate quality of evidence revealed that patient undergoing lumbar spine surgery might benefit from spinal or epidural anesthesia.

The Effects of the Use of Diluted Bupivacaine in Sequential Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Hypotension and Motor Block after Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Maternal hypotension is a common hemodynamic consequence of spinal anesthesia during cesarean delivery, but low-dose spinal anesthesia (<9 mg bupivacaine) ensures stable hemodynamics and reduces motor block. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to examine the effects of baricity of intrathecal administration of diluted bupivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for cesarean delivery on maternal hypotension and motor block after surgery. METHODS: The anesthesia and nursing records of 35 patients who had given birth by cesarean delivery under CSEA with intrathecal administration of plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine diluted in cerebrospinal fluid were reviewed. All patients were assigned to who received hyperbaric bupivacaine (hyperbaric group) or plain bupivacaine (plain group). Definition of feasibility of cesarean delivery by diluted low dose bupivacaine was set as no requirement of epidural administration of levobupivacaine during surgery. The incidences of hypotension (nadir blood pressure less than 80% of preanesthetic value) and motor block were reviewed. RESULTS: In 24 of the patients (68%), no additional epidural anesthesia was needed during surgery. One patient (3%) required additional epidural anesthesia before delivery. Feasibility of cesarean delivery was not different between hyperbaric group and plain group (p>0.99). Eighteen of the patients (51%) did not require vasopressors, while 17 (49%) developed hypotension. There was no difference in incidence of maternal hypotension between hyperbaric and plain group. Only 6 patients (17%) required more than 3 times of administration of vasopressors among all patients. Modified Bromage scale scores were recorded in 28 of the patients (80%); scores of 0 (no motor block) were recorded in seven of them, and 1 in eight of them. CONCLUSION: Low-dose either plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine diluted in cerebrospinal fluid to approximately twice the volume may provide sufficient analgesia, fast motor recovery. Incidence of maternal hypotension was similar in hyperbaric and plain group.