Ambulatory cataract surgery centre without perioperative anaesthesia care: a prospective cohort study.

This study aims to evaluate the safety and patient satisfaction of a fast-track procedure for cataract surgery under topical anaesthesia without perioperative anaesthesia care. This is a prospective single-centre study including all cataract procedures in the Centre Ambulatoire de la Chirurgie de la Cataracte at the Hospital of Bourges between May and August 2018. Procedures were performed under topical anaesthesia without the presence of a nurse anaesthesiologist or anaesthesiologist, the patient had not fasted, and no peripheral venous line was placed. Only heart rate and oxygen saturation were monitored intraoperatively with pulse oximetry. Incidence and nature of intraoperative adverse events and surgical complications were recorded. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anaesthesia Scale (ISAS). In total, 651 cataract surgeries were performed among which 614 (94.3%) were uneventful. Thirty (4.6%) intraoperative adverse events and 8 (1.2%) surgical complications were recorded. All surgeries were successfully completed. No medical emergency team intervention or hospital admittance was encountered. The mean ISAS score was 5.7/6, indicating high patient satisfaction. Cataract surgery in an ambulatory cataract surgery centre without perioperative anaesthesia care is a safe procedure with high patient satisfaction for screened patients. Anaesthesia ressources are scarce and may be more beneficial to more complex ophthalmic or non-ophthalmic surgeries.

Conscious Sedation in Dentistry.

Invasive dental procedures can be performed only with local anesthesia; in some cases, it may be useful to combine the administration of drugs to obtain anxiolysis with local anesthesia. Sedation required level should be individually adjusted to achieve a proper balance between the needs of the patient, the operator, and the safety of the procedure. Surgical time is an important factor for post-operative phases, and this could be greatly increased by whether the patient interrupts the surgeon or if it is not collaborative. In this manuscript some dentistry-used methods to practice conscious sedation have been evaluated. This manuscript could be a useful reading on the current state of conscious sedation in dentistry and an important starting point for future perspectives. Surely the search for safer drugs for our patients could have beneficial effects for them and for the clinicians.

Patients' Experiences During Carotid Endarterectomy Performed Under Local Anesthesia.

PURPOSE: To describe patients' experiences undergoing a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under local anesthesia. DESIGN: Explorative qualitative design. METHODS: Semistructured interviews with 15 participants who had undergone CEA under local anesthesia, analyzed by content analysis. FINDINGS: Undergoing CEA under local anesthesia entails enduring stress with no possibility of withdrawal. Patients' lack of understanding of local anesthesia and experiencing pain and discomfort caused feelings of stress. The surgery resulted in a loss of control; patients had to surrender their autonomy to someone else. The nurse anesthetist was the link to the world outside the operating room (OR), and that nurse conveyed feelings of safety and security during the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' experiences ranged from being pleased with the surgical procedure and local anesthesia to vowing never to undergo such a procedure again. It is important to focus on the patients' experiences and feelings when choosing a method of anesthesia.

Local anesthesia in pediatric dermatologic surgery: Evaluation of a patient-centered approach.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: A few studies have documented the effect of local anesthesia for minor dermatologic surgical procedures on children and their parents. Our objective was to evaluate the psychological effect and global satisfaction of a patient-centered approach to dermatologic surgery under local anesthesia. METHODS: Two self-administered questionnaires were used to evaluate the distress and global satisfaction of 388 children who underwent dermatologic surgery under local anesthesia, accompanied by oral and written therapeutic education measures (structured information and a cartoon brochure illustrating the procedure) addressed to children and parents. Distraction techniques were also used during the procedures. RESULTS: Although 54.5% of patients manifested some degree of fear, all other parameters analyzed (pain, surgery-related distress, surgical team-patient and -family relationship, global satisfaction) indicated that the procedures resulted in limited distress and that the large majority of children and parents tolerated them well. CONCLUSION: Specific measures for therapeutic pediatric patient education may be helpful in limiting discomfort, anxiety, and pain perception linked to procedures performed under local anesthesia. Further controlled studies are required to more precisely assess the benefits of specific therapeutic education measures.

Patients' Perioperative Experience of Awake Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease.

BACKGROUND: Awake craniotomy for tumor resection and epilepsy surgery is a well-tolerated procedure. Qualitative data on patients' experience of awake deep-brain stimulation (DBS) are, however, lacking. We collected qualitative data on patients' experience of awake DBS with a view to identifying areas for improvement. METHODS: Forty-one patients undergoing DBS for Parkinson disease between 2009 and 2015 were surveyed with a structured questionnaire designed to receive patient feedback regarding perioperative management of the awake stage of the procedure. RESULTS: More than 90% of patients felt well-informed. Most remembered the procedure, and almost all were happy that they did. One half of the patients experienced pain, often significant, during the procedure. This mainly occurred during burr-hole drilling and stereotactic frame placement. CONCLUSIONS: Although awake DBS is well-tolerated, pain and off-period symptoms are an issue for a significant number of patients. Efforts should be made to minimize these unpleasant aspects of awake DBS.

Patient-perceived outcomes of different anaesthetic techniques in classical surgical treatment of varicose veins of lower limbs.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the effects of spinal or locoregional anaesthesia versus local tumescent anesthesia during traditional surgical treatment of saphenous reflux, in terms of pain and postoperative functional recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January to December 2014, 195 consecutive interventions of stripping of the greater saphenous vein for valvular incompetence were performed. In 114 cases spinal or locoregional anaesthesia was performed (group 1), in the remaining 81 cases local anaesthesia with the tumescence technique was carried out (group 2). All patients underwent an assessment of perceived pain by means of verbal rating scale before and at the end of surgery, at discharge and after a month. The times of recovery of ambulation during hospital stay and at the discharge were recorded and use of analgesic drugs during hospitalization and at home. At the end of the study, patients were asked to express their approval rating on the type of anaesthesia. RESULTS: Patients in group 2 experienced mild to moderate intraoperative pain more frequently than patients in group 1 (p<0.001), while patients in group 1 had more mild adverse anaesthesia-related events than patients in group 2. Patients in group 2 had faster recovery of ambulation and earlier discharge than patients in group 1.Thirty-day results were similar in the two groups; however, patients in group 2 had a higher degree of satisfaction than patients in group 1 with regard to the type of anaesthesia (p<0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Both locoregional and local tumescent anaesthesia are effective and well accepted by the patients, with similar intra-hospital and 30-day results. KEY WORDS: Great Saphenous Vein, Local tumescent anaesthesia, Pain, Stripping.

Lidocaine versus lidocaine plus benzydamine as a topical anesthesia regimen for unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comparison study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim was to assess the efficacy of adding benzydamine (B) spray to standard treatment with a lidocaine (L) spray before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) as a topical anaesthetic regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 118 adult patients undergoing outpatient UGE were randomly assigned to receive L (n=44), LB (n=38) or B (n=36) before the procedure. The primary outcome was the patient tolerance score, which represents a summative evaluation of the taste of the anesthetic agent, the intensity of pharyngeal numbness, the amount of coughing or gagging and the degree of discomfort during oesophageal intubation. RESULTS: The median (min-max) patient tolerance scores were comparable between groups LB (10.5; range 5-12) and L (10; range 4-13) (p=0.235) and significantly lower in group B (7.5; range 3-12) (p<0.01). LB improved several secondary outcomes. Oesophageal intubation was less difficult (5 [range 2-10] vs 3 [range 0-8], p<0.001), and a lower proportion of patients developed postprocedural sore throat (4 [10.5%] vs 15 [34.1%], p=0.011) in LB compared to L. CONCLUSION: LB is not superior to L in terms of overall patient tolerance, but LB may be preferred over L in cases with difficult oesophageal intubation or a previous history of postprocedural sore throat.

[Anterior colporrhaphy under local anesthesia]. / Prední posevní plastika v lokální anestezii.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the advantage of the usage of local anesthesia for vaginal surgery in gerontological patients. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Charles University in Prague, 1st Medical Faculty and Hospital Bulovka, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prague. METHODS: 43 patients over 60, 4 were younger, with diagnosed descent of anterior vaginal wall G II-III according to International Continence Society classification, were included into the study. They underwent anterior vaginal wall repair in the sole local anesthesia. For the assessment of the procedure, we used anamnestic data and quality of life questionnaires Visual analogue scale, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory - 20. RESULTS: The results of used questionnaires confirmed positive results of the local anesthesia. We demonstrated statistically significant improvement of the urinary incontinence too, as well as subjective perception of the descent. CONCLUSION: Excellent subjective assessment of usage of local anesthesia showed us new operative possibility in treatment applicable in high-risk patients.

Assessment of general pre and postoperative anxiety in patients undergoing tooth extraction: a prospective study.

Our aim was to analyse the amount of anxiety and fear felt before, immediately after, and one week after, dental extraction. We studied 70 patients (35 men and 35 women (mean (SD) age 43 (±10) years), who were listed for dental extraction under local anaesthesia in a private clinic that specialised in oral surgery. Patients were evaluated on 3 consecutive occasions: immediately preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 7 days later. Each patient's anxiety was measured using Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Spanish version), the Modified Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and the Dental Fear Survey. There were significant differences in the STAI-Trait scale between before and 7 days after extraction (p=0.04), and in the MDAS between before and immediately after extraction (p=0.02), and between immediately after and 7 days after extraction (p=<0.001). The DFS also differed between before and immediately after extraction (p=0.002), and between immediately and 7 days after extraction (p<0.001). Dental anxiety immediately after tooth extraction may be influenced by operative techniques (type of anaesthesia, duration of operation, or position of tooth extracted), but anxiety at 7 days after extraction is not.

Does planned intravenous sedation affect preoperative anxiety in patients?

Dental surgery generally causes stress and fear, which may affect patient physiology and increase perioperative anxiety. Dental anxiety is considered to be an important factor in determining the need for intravenous sedation. One of the gold standards for measuring preoperative anxiety is Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The authors have previously assessed preoperative anxiety using STAI and recommended that intravenous sedation be performed for patients whose anxiety level is high. The intravenous cannulation necessary for sedation and sedation itself may increase anxiety. The authors carried out this study to examine whether planning intravenous sedation before surgery increases preoperative anxiety. The subjects were patients who planned to undergo wisdom teeth extraction under local anaesthesia in the authors' hospital. They were divided into two groups on the basis of the planned intravenous sedation. STAI scores were compared between the initial visit and just before surgery. There were no significant differences in the state and trait anxiety scores between the initial visit and the day of the surgery in the two groups. Planned intravenous sedation based on the evaluation of anxiety levels using STAI is effective for promoting a safe operation without aggravating preoperative anxiety.

The power of words: sources of anxiety in patients undergoing local anaesthetic plastic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: With local or regional anaesthesia being employed for more as well as more complex surgical procedures, an increasing number of patients remain fully conscious during their operation. This is generally perceived as being advantageous to the patient as less time is spent in hospital and the side effects of general anaesthesia are avoided. However, there is no direct measure of the patient experience during 'awake surgery', in particular of which aspects of the process may be distressing. METHODS: Seventy patients undergoing day case plastic surgery under local anaesthesia were asked to complete a short questionnaire immediately following their operation. This was designed to identify specific factors likely to either increase or reduce anxiety during surgery. The questionnaire was initially validated on a pilot group of ten patients. RESULTS: Unsurprisingly, painful stimuli such as injections were identified as potential stressors. More interestingly, the data highlighted that some commonly used surgical terms such as 'knife' and 'scalpel' provoke considerable anxiety in the conscious patient. This varied according to age and sex with younger and female patients being most vulnerable. Other events identified as potential stressors, such as casual conversations and movements among theatre staff, were actually shown to be non-stressful and, in some cases, stress relieving. CONCLUSIONS: Technical jargon used by surgical staff can elevate anxiety levels among patients who are awake for their operation. Careful consideration of the words we use may reduce this, particularly in female patients.

Impact of anxiety on pain perception associated with periodontal and implant surgery in a private practice.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on pain perception after periodontal or implant surgery or how pain perception is affected by presurgical anxiety. METHODS: Presurgical anxiety and surgical pain perceptions were measured by visual analog scale (VAS) scores and by interview of patients (N = 102) undergoing periodontal or implant therapy in a private periodontal specialty practice in Norway. RESULTS: Patients reported that bad taste, receiving the local anesthetic, and excessive fluid in the mouth were the most uncomfortable experiences associated with periodontal or implant surgery. Analysis of identical responses to these questions showed that there was low intrapatient agreement for uncomfortable experiences (κ = 0.18), but there was reasonably good agreement for comfortable experiences (κ = 0.76). There were no significant differences between repeated VAS scores for pain perception (P = 0.91) or anxiety (P = 0.75) from two consecutive surgeries. There were no significant differences of VAS scores for perception of discomfort for periodontal surgery (9.9 ± 17.0) compared to implant surgery (16.7 ± 24.2; P >0.2). Presurgical anxiety scores were higher for implant surgery (45.5 ± 33.4) than for periodontal surgery (19.5 ± 28.1; P <0.01). Patients with high pretreatment anxiety scores reported that periodontal and implant surgery were more uncomfortable than patients with low anxiety scores (20.5 ± 25.6 versus 0.45 ± 1; P <0.001). VAS perception and anxiety scores did not change on first-time through fourth-time surgeries, but retreatment surgery patients recorded higher perception and anxiety VAS scores than patients undergoing surgery for the third or fourth time (P <0.01). Females recorded significantly higher anxiety scores than males (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: For periodontal surgery and implant treatments pain perception is affected by the level of presurgical anxiety.

Influence of gender and anaesthesia type on day surgery anxiety.

AIM: To investigate the possible influence of gender and anaesthesia type on anxiety prior to day surgery. BACKGROUND: Elective surgery undertaken on a day, short stay or 'day of surgery' basis is growing and much emphasis also placed on 'enhanced recovery' for in-patient surgery. During such brief episodes preoperative apprehension can be considerable but the opportunity to help reduce anxiety is minimal and formal plans uncommon. METHOD: As part of a larger study, a questionnaire was distributed to 1606 patients undergoing day surgery, with anaesthesia (2005-2007). Participants were requested to return the questionnaire by mail 24-48 hours following surgery, with 674 returned. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: Of the total patients 82·4% experienced anxiety on the day of surgery with the wait, anaesthesia and possible pain being common anxiety-provoking aspects. The majority preferred to receive information between 1-4 weeks in advance and participants experiencing general anaesthesia required information at a statistically significantly earlier stage. General anaesthesia patients were statistically significantly more anxious than local anaesthesia patients and desired more information. Female patients were statistically significantly more anxious, anxiety commenced earlier and they preferred to wait with a relative/friend or talk with other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety was experienced by the majority of participants but was more prevalent amongst general anaesthesia and female patients. For general anaesthesia patients, a comprehensive level of information may be required a number of weeks prior to surgery and gender differences associated with the preoperative wait may require greater consideration.

Understanding people's experience of vitreo-retinal day surgery: a Gadamerian-guided study.

AIM: This paper is a report of a study that aimed to understand the individual's experience of day surgery for repair of vitreo-retinal pathology. BACKGROUND: Day surgery evolved as a global phenomenon in response to tensions existing between community demand for health-care services and fiscal limitations. Since then vitreo-retinal surgery has been routinely performed as day surgery. Whilst studies have reported on patients' experience's following inpatient surgery, there has been limited investigation of vitreo-retinal day surgery from the patient's perspective. METHODS: In-depth unstructured interviews with 18 people were conducted between July 2006 and December 2007. Data analysis using philosophical hermeneutic techniques enabled a co-constructed understanding, where, the 'conditions of understanding' as described by Gadamer were established. FINDINGS: Guided by a Gadamerian approach to analysis, four constitutive themes were identified: 'the physical Self', 'the psychological Self', 'the historically located Self' and 'the Self located in the community'. Within each theme the participant's positive and negative experiences were understood in the context of human need, and gaps in nursing care became illuminated. These experiences included: pain, nausea, problematic self-care and psychological angst. CONCLUSION: Insights into the experience of vitreo-retinal day surgery, gained from this study can be used to inform nurses planning care for people with vitreo-retinal pathology. Nursing care must address broader patient needs that span multiple human domains, particularly when vision has been threatened by complex pathology.

A clinician guide to patients afraid of dental injections and numbness.

Fears of dental injections remain a clinical problem often requiring cognitive behavioural psychology counselling and sedation in order to carry out needed dental treatment. This study, based on a national survey in Australia, compared patient concerns about numbness caused by local anaesthesia and fears of the injection itself. It also examined associations between dental fearfulness and avoidance associated with patient self-reported negative experiences and treatment need. Clinical advice on how to approach such patients is offered. Relatively high levels of dental anxiety and fear have been reported in several industrialised Western societies (McGrath & Bedi, 2004; Armfield, Spencer & Stewart, 2006; Lahti et al., 2007; Enkling, Marwinski Jöhren, 2006). In the U.K., almost one in three adults consider themselves to always be anxious about going to the dentist (Nuttall et al., 2001). Of concern is that this dental fear may be passed on to the children of anxious adults (Nuttall, Gilbert & Morris, 2008), leading to an inter-generational perpetuation of the problem. There is considerable evidence that dental fear is related to poorer oral health, reduced dental attendance and increased treatment stress for the attending dentist. There are many aspects of going to a dentist that might elicit feelings of apprehension, concern or anxiety in prospective patients (Liddell & Gosse, 1998; Oosterink, de Jongh & Aartman, 2008). One of the most commonly reported concerns relates to receiving injections. Indeed, fear of needles and the treatment of injection fear has been an important focus of a research in the U.K. (Boyle, Newton & Milgrom, 2010). Needle fear, in particular, is a major issue given that the delivery of local anaesthesia via injection is the central plank of pain relief techniques in dentistry (Malamed, 2009) and dentists as well as patients often avoid difficult injections as a consequence, resulting in poor pain control. A less well described anxiety of receiving dental treatment is fear of numbness associated with the dental injection (Morse & Cohen, 1983). Certainly, many dentists believe that their patients avoid local anaesthesia because of a wish to avoid the disturbing effects of numbness (Moore et al., 1998). Milgrom et al. (1997) found that fears about the numbness associated with receiving local anaesthesia significantly differentiated avoiders and non-avoiders of dental treatment. However, these concerns appeared to be much less common than those concerning the perceived pain of injections and fear of bodily injury resulting from the injection (Milgrom et al., 1997; Kaako et al., 1998). Consistent with these findings, whereas 43% of English patients asked to imagine undergoing future third molar surgery expressed concerns primarily about pain, only 6% of patients indicated concern about numbness as their worst fear (Earl, 1994). More recently, a study of Dutch people found that the feeling of numbness from the anaesthesia was rated as the 41st most feared dental stimulus out of a list of 67 possible stimuli, and that only 1.5% of the general population regarded numbness as extremely anxiety provoking (Oosterink, de Jongh & Aartman, 2008). However, it is important for a clinician to differentiate between those who dislike the sensation of temporary numbness versus those who may worry that it may never wear off. Such problem thinking can be an issue irrespective of whether a patient overcomes the fear of needles with sedation or not. A large number of patients dislike the sensation of numbness enough for manufacturers to respond with a partial antidote in alpha adrenergic receptor antagonist phentolamine mesylate (OraVerse Sanofi-Aventis, Hersh & Lindemeyer, 2010). Approval of this agent, which shortens the length of soft tissue anaesthesia after inferior alveolar block, is pending in the UK and other European countries. In other cases, dentists resort to using local anaesthetics without vasoconstrictors to shorten the period of anaesthesia (Fiset, Getz, Milgrom & Weinstein, 1989). While the association between dental fear and fear of injections has received considerable attention, the relationship between dental fear and numbness has received less attention. In particular, the nature of the associations between dental fear and avoidance and anxiety over numbness has not been studied. There has also been no research into whether or not concerns over numbness are independent of injection concerns. Finally, the association between fear of numbness and injections and dental avoidance and treatment needs has not been investigated. This study, based on survey work in Australia, aimed to compare patient concerns about numbness caused by receiving anaesthesia to that of anxiety over the receipt of needles and injections. Associations with dental fear and avoidance as well as negative experiences and treatment needs were also explored.

Patients appreciation for information on anesthesia and anxiolysis in dentistry.

AIM: The research regards information on anesthesia to patients undergoing oral surgery. Every patient evaluated the information received at the end of the preoperative visit and in the postoperative period. METHODS: One hundred-fifty dental patients were asked about the most appreciated information received in the preoperative visit on the anxiolytic technique, local anesthesia and treatment of the perioperative pain. Afterwards the patients had to report on their reaction to the content of the preoperative visit and information quality. On a phone interview they had to evaluate their appreciation of the anxiolytic technique, their perception during loco-regional anesthesia and incidence of pain and edema. RESULTS: The most appreciated details were those on the intervention, pharmacologic treatment, postoperative complicances, postoperative pain and operative competence; less appreciated were those on loco-regional anesthesia, duration of the intervention, anxiolytic techniques, hospital reception and permanence in the hospital. Ninety-eight percent of the patients considered to have been adequately informed on a context judged to be extraordinary (99.3%), 96.6% indicated the information as necessary, 98.6% appreciated the treatment of the intraoperative and postoperative (99.3%) pain and 99.3% the anxiolytic treatment. On the telephone interview, 100% of patients expressed satisfaction for the experienced intraoperative tranquillity, 91.3% complained for not having received in the past a similar preoperative visit, 99.3% wished a diffused application of the information. The loco-regional anesthesia was associated to psychological detachment in 84% of the cases and the incidence of postoperative pain was of 36%. CONCLUSION: The information on the anxiolytic techniques, loco-regional anesthesia, treatment of perioperative pain and postoperative distress was enthusiastically accepted and albeit initially induced feelings of astonishment resulted to be appreciated and preferred in the whole of the patients.

Management of the uncooperative child.

The management of a child who requires a medical procedure is a challenging issue for the oral and maxillofacial surgeon (OMS) and practitioners in the dental specialties. The office of the OMS is traditionally one in which short outpatient procedures are performed within brief appointment times often using only local anesthesia. For typical children, this brief procedure may be difficult, and for children with behavioral challenges, it may be impossible without the use of behavioral management techniques or pharmacologic modalities. Practitioners must be aware of current trends in pediatric mental health and should develop treatment protocols to avoid complications.

Anaesthesia for phacosemulsification surgery: is it as comfortable as we think?

We report an observational prospective study to determine which local anaesthetic technique gave the most comfort during phacoemulsification (cataract) surgery. 1835 patients were recruited. 61.8% were female. Peribulbar (18.2%), subtenons (28.6%), and topical (53.2%) anaesthesia was used. The pain score was assessed by the visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) which ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse possible pain). The lowest mean pain score occurred in the subtenons group, mean VAPS 0.2 (95% CI 0.1-0.3). The mean pain scores for topical and peribulbar anaesthesia were 0.6 (95% CI 0.5-0.7) and 0.59 (95% CI 0.41-0.76) respectively. Subtenons anaesthesia gave the most comfort during phacoemulsification. Patients experienced more discomfort with 2nd eye surgery. Older patients and males had a higher pain threshold in all three anaesthetic groups.