Patient Perceptions of Surveillance of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Over 85s.

BACKGROUND: Recently instigated local practice for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) involves contacting all patients, aged ≥85 years, to discuss with them the advantages and disadvantages of removal from surveillance. However, reasons why patients opt to remain on, or come off, surveillance, are currently unknown. The present study's objective is to explore patient perception of surveillance decision-making. METHODS: A mixed-methods exploratory evaluation was undertaken using patient feedback obtained from a telephone survey. All patients aged ≥85 years, who had a consultation regarding ongoing surveillance of small AAAs (30-49 mm), and consented, were contacted by researchers, who conducted semi-structured interviews concerning factors influencing decision-making. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients (20 male; mean age = 86.9 years) were interviewed; 16 of 24 (66%) had opted to remain on surveillance, with no age difference between those opting in or out. Most felt surveillance was important (91%), and that it made them feel safer (73%). The majority (73%) thought they knew what happened when their AAA reached threshold (5.5 cm), what happened when a threshold AAA is not fixed (64%), and how major AAA surgery is (59%). However, actual knowledge was poor: most (91%) correctly understood surgery was major, but 56% thought that threshold AAA meant certain death or rupture; and 38% thought immediate surgery was required. Thematic analysis expounded patients' beliefs regarding surveillance, which were summarized in 3 distinct subgroups: reliance on professionals' opinions, needing peace of mind, and poor understanding. CONCLUSIONS: While most patients find surveillance reassuring, patient knowledge of AAA management at threshold is poor, potentially impacting surveillance decision-making. Elderly patients, with small AAAs contemplating ongoing surveillance, need to be better informed about AAA management at threshold to support shared decision-making.

Association of Diagnosis of Depression and Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth.

BACKGROUND: Depression is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events but its association with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) progression is unknown. This study examined if a diagnosis of depression was association with more rapid AAA growth. METHODS: Patients with small AAA measuring between 30 and 50 mm were recruited from surveillance programs at 4 Australian centres. Maximum AAA diameter was measured by ultrasound imaging using a standardised and reproducible protocol to monitor AAA growth. Depression was defined from medical records of treatment for depression at recruitment. Linear mixed effects modelling was performed to examine the independent association of depression with AAA growth. A propensity matched sub-analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 574 participants were included of whom 73 (12.7%) were diagnosed with depression. Participants were followed with a median of 3 (Inter-quartile range (IQR): 2, 5) ultrasound scans for a median of 2.1 (IQR: 1.1, 3.5) years. The unadjusted model suggested that annual AAA growth was non-significantly reduced (mean difference: -0.3 mm/year; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.7, 0.2; P = 0.26) in participants with a diagnosis of depression compared to other participants. After adjustment for covariates, depression was not significantly associated with AAA growth (mean difference: -0.3 mm/year; 95% CI: -0.8, 0.2; P = 0.27). Findings were similar in the propensity matched sub-analysis. Sensitivity analyses investigating the impact of initial AAA diameter and follow up on the association of depression with AAA growth found no interaction. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that depression was not associated with faster AAA growth.

A randomized clinical trial of an eHealth intervention on anxiety in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

BACKGROUND: The potential benefit of eHealth interventions in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is uncertain. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of an eHealth intervention on anxiety in patients with AAA undergoing surgery. METHODS: A single-centre randomized clinical trial of patients with AAA scheduled for surgical repair was undertaken. The intervention group received an eHealth tool and psychosocial support besides standard care. The control group received standard care. The analysis of treatment effects was performed as intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis. The primary outcome measure was anxiety mean score (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety (HADS)-A). Secondary outcomes measures were HADS Depression and short-form 12-item health survey mean scores. RESULTS: Some 120 participants were randomized. No effect on anxiety mean scores was found in the intention-to-treat analysis (-1.21 versus -0.54, P = 0.330). Among those randomized to the intervention, only 30 of 60 participants used the eHealth tool (application (app) users). The app users were younger and had a higher educational level. A decrease in anxiety mean scores was noted in those who used the app in the per protocol analysis (-2.00 versus -0.54, P = 0.028). The intervention group stated a lower physical-component health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (-4.32 versus -1.16, P = 0.042) but mental-component HRQoL and depressive symptoms were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery of an eHealth intervention in this RCT did not result in an improvement in anxiety scores in patients awaiting AAA surgery. Uptake of the eHealth tool was low, although it resulted in lower anxiety scores in those participants who actually used it. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03157973 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

The use of digital health technology to deliver information and provide psychosocial support has shown promising results but has been largely unexplored in people undergoing major blood vessel (vascular) surgery. This study reports the results of a randomized, controlled trial to examine the effects of an eHealth intervention on anxiety symptoms in patients undergoing surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (a major swelling of the main blood vessel in the tummy). The findings show that an eHealth tool paired with psychosocial support did not reduce anxiety symptoms, measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-A. Unfortunately, a large proportion of the participants declined to use the eHealth tool. However, those who used the eHealth tool appeared to benefit from reduced anxiety levels. The findings of the study support further research to understand how to improve engagement of patients with eHealth interventions in surgery. Special attention should be given to improve engagement in people who are elderly and those with lower educational attainment.

Depression Predicts Non-Home Discharge After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Mental health's impact on vascular surgical patients has long been overlooked. While outside the expertise of most surgeons, understanding the role that depression plays in the postoperative course could provide additional insight into opportunities to improve surgical outcomes and healthcare value. Additionally, non-home discharge (NHD) to a rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility after surgery is associated with impaired quality of life and higher postdischarge complications, readmissions, and mortality. We hypothesized that depression would be associated with an increased risk for NHD following abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: Nonruptured AAA repair cases were identified from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) using ICD-9 codes between 2005 and 2014. Depression, comorbidities, postoperative complications, and discharge destination were evaluated using statistical tests as appropriate to the data. A hierarchical multivariable logistic regression controlling for hospital level variation was used to examine the independent association between depression, and the primary outcome of NHD controlling for median income and confounders meeting P < 0.05 on univariate analysis. RESULTS: There were 99,934 total cases analyzed, of which 4,755 (4.8%) were diagnosed with depression and 10,618 (11.9%) required NHD. Patients with depression were younger, more likely to be women, white, have diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, tobacco use, and more likely to experience a postoperative complication. On adjusted multivariable analysis, patients with depression were more likely to require NHD (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68-2.08, c-statistic = 0.82). On stratified analysis by operative approach, depression had a larger effect estimate in endovascular repair (OR 2.19; 95% CI: 1.90-2.52) versus open repair (OR 1.60; 95% CI: 1.38-1.87). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative sample, patients with depression were more likely to require NHD after AAA repair. This study highlights the importance that depression plays in postoperative outcomes after AAA repair. Furthermore, addressing mental health preoperatively has the potential to improve outcomes in patients undergoing AAA repair.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Health Related Quality of Life and Reported Experiences in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Under Ultrasound Surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: Most screening and opportunistically detected abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are small and kept under surveillance for several years before preventive surgery. Living with the diagnosis of an AAA may have an influence on the patient's life. Thus, it is important to study patients' experiences so that the screening process and follow up care are adapted to the patient's needs. The aim was to review systematically review the current knowledge of the effect on health related quality of life (HRQoL) and patients' experiences of living with an AAA while under surveillance. METHODS: A systematic literature review of quantitative and qualitative studies, which were quality assessed according to the GRADE system, was carried out. Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE were searched. Narrative synthesis and meta-analysis were performed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS: Synthesis and meta-analyses of studies based on the Short Form-36 demonstrated that patients with an AAA consistently rated their general health (GH) lower than controls and conveyed no significant negative impact for patients with an AAA when assessed at follow up and compared with pre-screening. Synthesis and meta-analyses of HRQoL estimates encompassing mental health, anxiety, and depression demonstrated no significant differences for patients with AAA compared with controls, or within the AAA group. Qualitative studies revealed that patients with an AAA felt safe being under surveillance, and receiving a diagnosis of AAA set thoughts and feelings in motion regarding health, ageing, and mortality. Patients' lack of knowledge about the disease, its progression, and future planning can cause insecurity and worries. CONCLUSION: The current evidence does not support a negative impact on HRQoL from being under surveillance for an AAA. Qualitative data indicate that adequate patient information and professional care have the potential to reduce unnecessary worries and concerns in patients with an AAA.

Strength of public preferences for endovascular or open aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated public preferences for the treatment processes for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in order to allow them to be incorporated into a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS: This was a telephone survey using a trade-off method in UK resident adults (aged at least 18 years) with no previous diagnosis of a vascular condition. RESULTS: Some 167 of 209 participants (79·9 per cent) stated that they would prefer endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), 40 (19·1 per cent) preferred open surgery and two (1·0 per cent) stated no preference. Participants preferred EVAR because of the less invasive nature of the intervention and quicker recovery. Participants preferring open surgery cited reasons such as having a single follow-up appointment, and a procedure that felt more permanent. When participants were asked to make a sacrifice in order to have their preferred treatment, 122 (58·4 per cent) favoured EVAR, 18 (8·6 per cent) favoured open surgery and 69 (33·0 per cent) had no preference. Those preferring EVAR were willing to give up a mean of 0·135 expected quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) to have EVAR, compared with a willingness to give up 0·033 expected QALYs among those preferring open repair. CONCLUSION: These results indicate a clear preference for EVAR over open surgery for aortic aneurysm.

ANTECEDENTES: Este estudio evaluó las preferencias de la opinion pública en relación a las opciones de tratamiento para la reparación del aneurisma de aorta abdominal, con el objetivo de que dichas preferencias se puedan incorporar en un análisis de coste-efectividad. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una encuesta telefónica utilizando el método trade-off (solución de intercambio) en adultos residentes en el Reino Unido (mayores de 18 años) sin diagnóstico previo de enfermedad vascular. RESULTADOS: Un total de 167 (79,9%) de 209 participantes declararon que preferirían la reparación endovascular del aneurisma (endovascular aneurysm repair, EVAR), 40 (19,1%) prefirieron cirugía abierta y dos (1,0%) no tenían preferencia. Los participantes prefirieron el EVAR debido a la naturaleza menos invasiva de la intervención y a tiempos de recuperación más rápidos. Los participantes que preferían la cirugía abierta mencionaron como razones tener una única visita de seguimiento y consideraron que se trataba de un procedimiento más permanente. Cuando se pidió a los participantes que para recibir su tratamiento preferido hicieran un intercambio, 122 (58,4%) se decantaron por la EVAR, 18 (8,6%) por la cirugía abierta y 69 (33%) no tuvieron preferencia. Los que prefirieron EVAR estaban dispuestos a renunciar a una media de 0,135 años de vida ajustados por calidad (QALYs) esperados con tal de recibir una EVAR en comparación con la renuncia de 0,033 QALYs esperada entre quienes preferían la reparación abierta. CONCLUSIÓN: Estos resultados indican una clara preferencia por la EVAR sobre la cirugía abierta, lo que está en desacuerdo con la reciente recomendación de NICE de que la EVAR no debe recomendarse como una opción de tratamiento. Los hallazgos sugieren que se debe prestar mayor atención a las características del proceso de tratamiento. Al no incorporar explícitamente tales preferencias en el proceso de toma de decisiones, NICE corre el riesgo de recomendar opciones de tratamiento que son contrarias a las preferencias de la población del Reino Unido.

Life is about so much more: Patients' experiences of health, well-being, and recovery after operation of abdominal aortic aneurysm with open and endovascular treatment-A prospective study.

Different surgical treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysm can lead to different perceptions of health and well-being. The aim of this study was to describe patients' well-being, sense of coherence (SOC), and experiences of surgery after open and endovascular treatment one month and one and 2 years after the procedure. Seventy six patients participated (40 open repair; 36 endovascular aneurysm repair). The study was conducted using the SOC questionnaire, and specific questions about patients' experiences of the surgical treatment and well-being. After 2 years, no patient regretted the operation or considered it to be the most difficult experience they had ever had. Twenty percent of the patients were worried about complications one month after the operation. Both groups experienced difficulty in returning to normal activity after surgery at one month. At one and 2 years after the surgery, patients in both groups stated that it was other things in life that affected their well-being. The endovascular aneurysm repair group reported a significant decrease in SOC from baseline until one year (P = .012) and 2 years (P = .033). The open repair group reported a significant decrease after one year (0.033). The operation did not affect patients' way of thinking about the disease. Patients in both groups stated that it was other circumstances in life that affected their well-being one and 2 years after the treatment, which could indicate that long-term follow-up would not be necessary from a patient perspective. The operation affects patients' well-being a short time after the operation.

Impact on Quality of Life of Men with Screening-Detected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Attending Regular Follow ups: A Narrative Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review, summarise, and assess the available evidence regarding the impact on the quality of life (QoL) of men undergoing screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and attending regular follow ups. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were used for searching. The search was performed from April to July 2016, with an update in February-March 2018. The quality of the studies was appraised with respective checklists from the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. A narrative synthesis of the included studies was performed. The analysis included studies evaluating QoL in relation to one or more of the following concepts: physical function, psychological impact and social life in men undergoing AAA screening, but excluded studies evaluating QoL in AAA patients diagnosed outside a screening program. RESULTS: The initial results from the search were 128 articles. Duplicates were removed, titles and abstracts were screened, and 22 full text articles were collected. Based on the inclusion criteria, 11 quantitative studies were included. Inferior quality of life among men with detected AAA was identified compared to those without the diagnosis and the general population in the included studies. The self-perceived health decreased over time for the participants with AAA. Assessments after surgery showed that the participants returned to similar health as before the screening. A wide variety of factors regarding the methodologies, designs, measurements, sample sizes, and the time for the assessment were noted in the included studies. CONCLUSION: Quality of life is an important outcome for AAA screening and studies have been conducted in an attempt to address the imbalance between benefits and harm. However, it is still difficult to draw clear conclusions, possibly due to the heterogeneity of the original studies. Nevertheless, it is important to identify men with an AAA who develop conditions influencing their health and QoL in order to understand their care needs to further support them and improve their situation.

A Novel Quality of Life Instrument for Patients with an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: The surveillance and treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) may impact patient quality of life (QOL). A novel AAA specific QOL instrument was developed and validated to quantify the impact of AAA surveillance on QOL. METHODS: The study was performed in two phases: development (2011-2013) and validation (2013-2014) of a survey instrument. Content was informed by focus groups at three centres (22 patients) and two multidisciplinary physician focus groups (6 vascular surgeons, 7 primary care providers). Cognitive interviews (17 patients) ensured questions were understood as intended. The final survey was mailed to AAA patients at six US institutions. Patients were scored on two AAA specific domains of QOL: emotional impact (EIS) and behavioural change (BCS), range 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. Test retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed. Discriminant validity was determined by comparing scores between patients under surveillance vs. those who had undergone AAA repair. Scores were externally validated by correlation with the Short Form (SF)-12. RESULTS: A total of 1,008 (73%) of 1,373 patients returned surveys: 351 (35%) were under surveillance, 657 (65%) had undergone repair (endovascular, 414; open, 179; unsure, 64). Median EIS was 11 (range 0-95; IQR 7-26). Median BCS was 13 (range 0-100; IQR 9-47). To test reliability, 337 patients repeated the survey after four weeks with no significant differences between scores over time. EIS and BCS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha 0.85 and 0.75 respectively). There was strong correlation between scores (r = 0.53) and both related moderately to SF-12 scores (r = 0.45 and r = 0.39, respectively). Patients under AAA surveillance had worse EIS than repair patients (22 vs. 13; p < .001). Patients with a higher perceived rupture risk had a worse EIS (45 vs. 12; p < .001) and BCS (30 vs. 13; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: An AAA specific QOL instrument was successfully created and validated. The range of impact on QOL by AAA surveillance is broad. For most patients the impact is minimal, but for some, especially those with a greater perceived rupture risk, it is severe.

Swedish men and smoking: Views on screening-detected abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), most common among elderly male smokers, often show no symptoms before rupture. To facilitate better care and counselling targeted to smoking cessation for these patients, more knowledge is required about their views. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to describe the views on AAA and smoking among male smokers with screening-detected AAA. A qualitative approach with individual interviews with 16 men with screening-detected AAA was applied. Three had quit smoking by the time of the interviews. Thematic analysis was performed, and four themes emerged: (i) accepting the course of life; (ii) the elusive AAA: a disturbing experiencing or merely a minor inconvenience?; (iii) being in safe hands; and (iv) smoking as an unexpected topic of discussion. Most of the participants felt they were in "safe hands", although thoughts about death were also evoked. However, the information about smoking cessation was unexpected, and the relationship between AAA and smoking unclear. Presenting the connection between AAA and smoking in a clear manner and motivating smoking cessation in an individually-targeted way are important.

A systematic review on the quality of life and functional status after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in elderly patients with an average age older than 75 years.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are increasingly performed in elderly patients (>75 years of age) with satisfactory results. Quality of life (QOL) is increasingly considered a primary goal of intervention after AAA repair. However, there is currently no consensus on QOL after these procedures in elderly patients. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using strict eligibility criteria. Clinical studies reporting QOL in elderly patients (average age >75 years) after EVAR and OR were included. Quality appraisal and data tabulation were performed using predetermined forms. Data were synthesized by narrative review. Study quality was assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies with 1272 patients were included. After elective EVAR, disease-specific and generic QOL scores demonstrated an initial postoperative deterioration. By 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively, mental health components have improved to scores similar to or better than those at baseline. Physical health components take up to 3 months to return to baseline. After this, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and EuroQol-5 Dimension scores are maintained at preoperative levels for 1 to 3 years. In emergent EVAR, long-term survivors may have QOL comparable to that of the general population. Elective OR appears to have comparable QOL for up to 3 years compared with a matched population. QOL after emergent OR seems poor. Data on OR in elderly patients remain limited. CONCLUSIONS: QOL after EVAR and OR declines early, with a 4- to 6-week delay in mental health recovery and 1- to 3-month delay in physical health recovery. QOL eventually returns to baseline and can be maintained in the long term. This review supports AAA repair in elderly patients from a QOL perspective.

Inadequate Health Literacy in Patients with Arterial Vascular Disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to identify the prevalence of inadequate health literacy in patients with arterial vascular disease. This was a cross sectional study. METHODS: Patients with arterial vascular disease visiting the outpatient clinic between January 5, 2015 and December 28, 2016, were randomly included and screened for inadequate health literacy with the Newest Vital Sign-Dutch (NVS-D), a validated health literacy assessment measure. A score of <4 out of six identified individuals with inadequate health literacy. Age, gender, highest education level, and reason for consultation were also registered. Data analysis was performed using Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. Logistic regression with backward elimination was applied to identify independent predictors. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included. The mean NVS-D score was 1.91 (SD ± 1.948, median 1). The prevalence of inadequate health literacy was 76.7%. A significantly higher prevalence of inadequate health literacy was found in patients ≥65 years (p < .001) and patients with a lower education level (p < .001). No significant difference was found between female/male patients (p = .056), nor between participants with peripheral arterial occlusive disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm (p = .116). Age (OR 1.060; 95% CI 1.017-1.104; p = .005) and education level (OR 0.164; 95% CI 0.078-0.346; p < .001) were identified as independent predictors of inadequate health literacy. CONCLUSION: This study shows a prevalence of inadequate health literacy of 76.7% in patients with arterial vascular disease, with a significantly higher prevalence in patients ≥ 65 years and patients with a lower education level. The high prevalence of inadequate health literacy should be considered when information is provided, and suggests the need to further investigate the best methods to convey medical information to this group of vulnerable patients.

Patient satisfaction with the consent discussion is not improved by showing patients their computed tomography or angiography images before they undergo vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-based decision aids and other multimedia tools have been developed to help enrich the preoperative discussion between surgeon and patient. Use of these tools, however, can be time-consuming and logistically challenging. We investigated whether simply showing patients their images from preoperative computed tomography (CT) or angiography would improve patients' satisfaction with the preoperative discussion. We also examined whether this improved the patient's understanding and trust and whether it contributed to increased preoperative anxiety. METHODS: Patients undergoing either elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or lower limb revascularization were randomly assigned to either standard perioperative discussion or perioperative discussion and review of images (CT image or angiogram). Randomization was concealed and stratified by surgeon. Primary outcome was patient satisfaction with the preoperative discussion as measured by a validated 7-item scale (score, 0-28), with higher scores indicating improved satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included patient understanding, patient anxiety, patient trust, and length of preoperative discussion. Scores were compared using t-test. RESULTS: Overall, 51 patients were randomized, 25 to the intervention arm (discussion and imaging) and 26 to the control arm. Most patients were male (69%), and the average age was 70 years. Forty percent of patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, whereas 60% underwent lower limb revascularization. Patient satisfaction with the discussion was generally high, with no added improvement when preoperative images were reviewed (mean score, 24.9 ± 3.02 vs 24.8 ± 2.93; P = .88). Similarly, there was no difference in the patient's anxiety, level of trust, or understanding when the imaging review was compared with standard discussion. There was a trend toward longer preoperative discussions in the group that underwent imaging review (8.18 vs 6.35 minutes; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Showing patients their CT or angiography images during the preoperative discussion does not improve the patient's satisfaction with the consent discussion. Similarly, there was no effect on the patient's trust, understanding, or anxiety level. Our conclusions are limited by the lack of a standardized measure of patient understanding and not measuring outcomes postoperatively, both of which should be considered in future studies.

Impact of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is known to reduce AAA-related mortality; however, the psychological impact of population AAA screening is unclear. The aim was to assess the impact of AAA diagnosis on quality of life (QoL) using data from an established AAA screening programme. METHODS: Mental and physical QoL scores for men diagnosed with AAA through participation in the English and Welsh AAA screening programmes were compared with no-AAA controls. Participants were identified through the United Kingdom Aneurysm Growth Study (UKAGS), a nationwide prospective cohort study of men with an AAA of less than 55 mm diagnosed through voluntary participation in screening. The UKAGS participants completed QoL questionnaires at the time of screening and annually thereafter. RESULTS: A transient reduction in mental QoL scores was observed following the diagnosis of AAA, returning to baseline levels after 12 months. Physical QoL remained consistently lower in the AAA cohort. Participants thought about their AAA and the AAA growth progressively less 12 months after the initial screening diagnosis. AAA growth rate had no influence over QoL parameters. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that screening for AAA does reduce mental QoL; however, this effect is transient (less than 12 months). Men diagnosed with AAA have a consistently worse physical QoL compared with controls.

Self-efficacy is an independent predictor for postoperative six-minute walk distance after elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: Open surgery is performed to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), although the subsequent surgical stress leads to worse physical status. Preoperative self-efficacy has been reported to predict postoperative physical status after orthopedic surgery; however, it has not been sufficiently investigated in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the correlation between preoperative self-efficacy and postoperative six-minute walk distance (6MWD) in open AAA surgery. METHODS: Seventy patients who underwent open AAA surgery were included. Functional exercise capacity was measured using preoperative and 1 week postoperative 6MWD. Self-efficacy was preoperatively measured using self-efficacy for physical activity (SEPA). The correlations of postoperative 6MWD with age, height, BMI, preoperative 6MWD, SEPA, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, operative time, and blood loss were investigated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Single regression analysis showed that postoperative 6MWD was significantly correlated with age (r = -0.553, p ≤ 0.001), height (r = 0.292, p = 0.014), Charlson's comorbidity index (r = -0.268, p = 0.025), preoperative 6MWD (r = 0.572, p ≤ 0.001), SEPA (r = 0.586, p ≤ 0.001), and HADS-depression (r = -0.296, p = 0.013). Multiple regression analysis showed that age (p = 0.002), preoperative 6MWD (p = 0.013), and SEPA (p = 0.043) score were significantly correlated with postoperative 6MWD. CONCLUSIONS: Self-efficacy was an independent predictor for postoperative 6MWD after elective open AAA surgery. This suggests the importance of assessing not only physical status but also psychological factors such as self-efficacy. Implications for Rehabilitation Preoperative self-efficacy has been limited to reports after orthopedic surgery. We showed that preoperative self-efficacy predicted postoperative 6MWD after AAA surgery. Treatment to improve self-efficacy might be useful in patients receiving AAA surgery in rehabilitation.

Do psychological harms result from being labelled with an unexpected diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm or prostate cancer through screening? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: A potential psychological harm of screening is unexpected diagnosis-labelling. We need to know the frequency and severity of this harm to make informed decisions about screening. We asked whether current evidence allows an estimate of any psychological harm of labelling. As case studies, we used two conditions for which screening is common: prostate cancer (PCa) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). DESIGN: Systematic review with narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We searched the English language literature in PubMed, PsychINFO and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for research of any design published between 1 January 2002 and 23 January 2017 that provided valid data about the psychological state of people recently diagnosed with early stage PCa or AAA. Two authors independently used explicit criteria to review and critically appraise all studies for bias, applicability and the extent to which it provided evidence about the frequency and severity of harm from labelling. RESULTS: 35 quantitative studies (30 of PCa and 5 of AAA) met our criteria, 17 (48.6%) of which showed possible or definite psychological harm from labelling. None of these studies, however, had either appropriate measures or relevant comparisons to estimate the frequency and severity of psychological harm. Four PCa and three AAA qualitative studies all showed clear evidence of at least moderate psychological harm from labelling. Seven population-based studies found increased suicide in patients recently diagnosed with PCa. CONCLUSIONS: Although qualitative and population-based studies show that at least moderate psychological harm due to screening for PCa and AAA does occur, the current quantitative evidence is insufficient to allow a more precise estimation of frequency and severity. More sensitive measures and improved research designs are needed to fully characterise this harm. In the meantime, clinicians and recommendation panels should be aware of the occurrence of this harm.

Psychosocial consequences in men taking part in a national screening program for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has proven to reduce AAA-related mortality, but how the knowledge of having an untreated AAA affects health and daily life requires further clarification. The aim was to investigate the psychosocial consequences and sense of coherence (SOC) in 65-year-old men diagnosed with AAA and participating in a national screening program during a 6-month follow-up compared with men with no AAA. The single-center cohort study included 52 men with AAA and 118 men without AAA. A questionnaire including the Short Form 36 Health Survey, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SOC, questions concerning stress, and questions related to AAA were answered at baseline and after 6 months. Men with AAA reported more problems with physical functioning, pain, and general health than men with a normal aorta at baseline. After 6 months, men with AAA still reported more problems with physical functioning and stress in relation to disease than men with normal aortic diameter. No differences were observed between groups in SOC, anxiety, and depression. A significantly higher satisfaction with information from the physician and desire to learn about the AAA diagnosis was reported at baseline compared with that at follow-up. Having knowledge about the AAA diagnosis may moderately impact physical health and perceived stress, and in combination with the increased prevalence of other cardiovascular diseases, may lead to impaired perceived health for men diagnosed with AAA.

Editor's Choice - Inequalities in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening in England: Effects of Social Deprivation and Ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE: Population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men is currently ongoing in several countries. The aim was to examine the effects of deprivation and ethnicity on uptake of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and prevalence of AAA. METHODS: This was a review of outcomes from a population screening programme using data collected contemporaneously on a bespoke national database. Men aged 65 in two annual cohorts (2013/14 and 2014/15) were invited for AAA screening. Attendance and prevalence of AAA (aortic diameter >2.9 cm) were recorded. Results were compared according to measures of social deprivation and recorded ethnicity. RESULTS: Some 593,032 men were invited and 461,898 attended for ultrasound screening; uptake 77.9%. Uptake was related to social deprivation: 65.1% in the most deprived decile, 84.1% in the least deprived: OR for least deprived 2.84, 95% CI 2.76-2.92, p<.0001. Men in deprived areas were more likely to actively decline screening: 6% versus 3.8% in the least deprived decile. AAA were twice as common in the most deprived compared with the least deprived decile: OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.77-2.27, p<.0001. AAA were more common in white British men than in black (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31-0.71) or Asian (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.13-0.26) men. There was considerable local variation in all findings. CONCLUSIONS: Social deprivation affects uptake of AAA screening in 65 year old men. Local factors are the most important determinants of uptake, so solutions to improve uptake must be designed at local, not national level.

Perceived learning needs of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) should receive adequate information about the disease, treatment options, and self-care. Patients' learning needs should be acknowledged. The aim was to describe the perceived learning needs in patients with AAA. A secondary aim was to explore their experience of methods for patient education. METHODS: Three focus group interviews were conducted with 14 patients treated with open or endovascular repair of AAA. The interviews embraced initial diagnosis, surgical treatment, and follow-up from a learning perspective and were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Three categories and 10 subcategories emerged. The health care staff failed to meet the participants' individual learning needs. Participants relied on other pathways to obtain knowledge, such as the internet or anecdotal information from friends and family. Learning needs pertained to risks and complications with surgery, self-care, and rupture risk. The participants were reluctant to ask questions due to a stressful environment. They requested accessible written information, along with a professional contact person for coordination and support during the care pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AAA describe unmet learning needs in regard to risks and complications with the disease and surgical treatment but also disease management and lifestyle factors. Education material should be consistent, individualized and easily accessible for patients and next of kin. Additional psychosocial support is warranted. Adjusting information to patients' needs may improve patient satisfaction.

Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of patient-reported outcome measures for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to identify and evaluate existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to inform the selection for use in surgical practice. METHODS: Two reviews were conducted: a systematic review to identify valid, reliable and acceptable PROMs for patients with an AAA, and a qualitative evidence synthesis to assess the relevance to patients of the identified PROM items. PROM studies were evaluated for their psychometric properties using established assessment criteria, and for their methodological quality using the COSMIN checklist. Qualitative studies were synthesized using framework analysis, and concepts identified were then triangulated using a protocol with the item concepts of the identified PROMs. RESULTS: Four PROMs from three studies were identified in the first review: Short Form 36, Australian Vascular Quality of Life Index, Aneurysm Dependent Quality of Life (AneurysmDQoL) and Aneurysm Symptoms Rating Questionnaire (AneurysmSRQ). None of the identified PROMs had undergone a rigorous psychometric evaluation within the AAA population. Four studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, from which 28 concepts important to patients with an AAA were identified. The AneurysmDQoL and AneurysmSRQ together provided the most comprehensive assessment of these concepts. Fear of rupture, control, ability to forget about the condition and size of aneurysm were all concepts identified in the qualitative studies but not covered by items in the identified PROMs. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to develop PROMs for AAA that are reliable, valid and acceptable to patients.