Synthetic angiotensin II peptide derivatives confer protection against cerebral and severe non-cerebral malaria in murine models.

Malaria can have severe long-term effects. Even after treatment with antimalarial drugs eliminates the parasite, survivors of cerebral malaria may suffer from irreversible brain damage, leading to cognitive deficits. Angiotensin II, a natural human peptide hormone that regulates blood pressure, has been shown to be active against Plasmodium spp., the etiologic agent of malaria. Here, we tested two Ang II derivatives that do not elicit vasoconstriction in mice: VIPF, a linear tetrapeptide, which constitutes part of the hydrophobic portion of Ang II; and Ang II-SS, a disulfide-bridged derivative. The antiplasmodial potential of both peptides was evaluated with two mouse models: an experimental cerebral malaria model and a mouse model of non-cerebral malaria. The latter consisted of BALB/c mice infected with Plasmodium berghei ANKA. The peptides had no effect on mean blood pressure and significantly reduced parasitemia in both mouse models. Both peptides reduced the SHIRPA score, an assay used to assess murine health and behavior. However, only the constrained derivative (Ang II-SS), which was also resistant to proteolytic degradation, significantly increased mouse survival. Here, we show that synthetic peptides derived from Ang II are capable of conferring protection against severe manifestations of malaria in mouse models while overcoming the vasoconstrictive side effects of the parent peptide.

Angiotensin II in liver transplantation (AngLT-1): protocol of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Catecholamine vasopressors such as norepinephrine are the standard drugs used to maintain mean arterial pressure during liver transplantation. At high doses, catecholamines may impair organ perfusion. Angiotensin II is a peptide vasoconstrictor that may improve renal perfusion pressure and glomerular filtration rate, a haemodynamic profile that could reduce acute kidney injury. Angiotensin II is approved for vasodilatory shock but has not been rigorously evaluated for treatment of hypotension during liver transplantation. The objective is to assess the efficacy of angiotensin II as a second-line vasopressor infusion during liver transplantation. This trial will establish the efficacy of angiotensin II in decreasing the dose of norepinephrine to maintain adequate blood pressure. Completion of this study will allow design of a follow-up, multicentre trial powered to detect a reduction of organ injury in liver transplantation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a double-blind, randomised clinical trial. Eligible subjects are adults with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium Score ≥25 undergoing deceased donor liver transplantation. Subjects are randomised 1:1 to receive angiotensin II or saline placebo as the second-line vasopressor infusion. The study drug infusion is initiated on reaching a norepinephrine dose of 0.05 µg kg-1 min-1 and titrated per protocol. The primary outcome is the dose of norepinephrine required to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes include vasopressin or epinephrine requirement and duration of hypotension. Safety outcomes include incidence of thromboembolism within 48 hours of the end of surgery and severe hypertension. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed for all randomised subjects receiving the study drug. The total dose of norepinephrine will be compared between the two arms by a one-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (#20-30948). Results will be posted on ClinicalTrials.gov and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04901169.

Pharmacological Inhibition of Gasdermin D Suppresses Angiotensin II-Induced Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Gasdermin D, a molecule downstream of the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain containing inflammasome, forms the membrane pore for the secretion of interleukin (IL)-1ß and IL-18, and also mediates pyroptosis. This study was to explore the influence of treatment with disulfiram, a small molecule inhibitor to gasdermin D, on the formation and progression of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: AAAs were induced in 10-week-old male apolipoprotein E deficient mice by subcutaneous infusion of angiotensin II (1000 ng/min/kg body weight) for 28 days via osmotic minipumps. Three days prior to angiotensin II infusion, disulfiram (50 mg/kg) or an equal volume of saline as the vehicle control was administered daily via oral gavage. The influence on experimental AAAs was analyzed by serial measurements of aortic diameters via ultrasonography, grading AAA severity and histopathology at sacrifice. Serum IL-1ß and IL-18 levels, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and triglyceride were also measured. Additional experiments assayed the influences on the cell viability and IL-1ß secretion of in vitro activated macrophages. RESULTS: Disulfiram significantly reduced the enlargement, incidence, and severity of angiotensin II-induced experimental AAAs with attenuation of medial elastin breaks, mural macrophage accumulation, and systolic blood pressure. The AAA suppression was also associated with reduced systemic levels of IL-1ß but not IL-18. However, disulfiram treatment had no impact on body weight gain and lipid levels in aneurysmal mice. Additionally, disulfiram treatment also markedly reduced the secretion of IL-1ß from activated macrophages with a limited effect on cell viability in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Gasdermin D inhibition by disulfiram attenuated angiotensin II-induced experimental AAAs with reduced systemic IL-1ß levels and in vitro activated macrophage IL-1ß secretion. Our study suggests that pharmacological gasdermin D inhibition may have translational potential for limiting clinical AAA progression.

A PILOT STUDY OF ANGIOTENSIN II AS PRIMARY VASOPRESSOR IN CRITICALLY ILL ADULTS WITH VASODILATORY HYPOTENSION: THE ARAMIS STUDY.

ABSTRACT: Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using angiotensin II (Ang2) as primary vasopressor for vasodilatory hypotension. Methods: This was a prospective observational study of critically ill adults admitted to an academic intensive care unit (ICU) with vasodilatory hypotension. We treated 40 patients with Ang2 as primary vasopressor and compared them with 80 matched controls who received conventional vasopressors (norepinephrine, vasopressin, metaraminol, epinephrine, or combinations). Results : Mean age was 63 years and median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score was 65. Ang2 patients had lower ICU mortality (10% vs 26%, P = 0.04); however, their 28- and 90-day mortality was not significantly different (18% vs 29%, P = 0.18; 22% vs 30%, P = 0.39). Peak serum creatinine levels were similar (128 vs 126 µmol/L, P = 0.81), as was the incidence and stage of acute kidney injury (70% vs 74%, P = 0.66), requirement for continuous renal replacement therapy (14% vs 13%, P = 0.84), and risk of major adverse kidney events at 7 days (20% vs 29%, P = 0.30). However, Ang2 patients with prior exposure to renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors had a lower peak serum creatinine ( P = 0.03 for interaction) than conventional vasopressors patients, and serum troponin elevations were less common with Ang2 (8% vs 22%, P = 0.04). The incidence of thromboembolic complications was similar. Conclusions: Primary Ang2 administration in vasodilatory hypotension did not seem harmful compared with conventional vasopressors. Although Ang2 did not decrease peak serum creatinine levels or major adverse kidney events, its effects on intensive care unit survival, serum troponin, and renal function in patients on renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors warrant further exploration in randomized trials (ACTRN12621000281897).

Efficacy and safety of angiotensin II in cardiogenic shock: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In recent times, there is increasing interest in the role of angiotensin II in CS. We sought to systematically review the current literature on the use of angiotensin II in CS. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, PubMed Central, and CINAHL databases were systematically searched for studies that evaluated the efficacy of angiotensin II in patients with CS during 01/01/2010-07/07/2022. Outcomes of interest included change in mean arterial pressure (MAP), vasoactive medication requirements (percent change in norepinephrine equivalent [NEE] dose), all-cause mortality, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the total 2,402 search results, 15 studies comprising 195 patients were included of which 156 (80%) received angiotensin II. Eleven patients (84.6%) in case reports and case series with reported MAP data at hour 12 noted an increase in MAP. Two studies noted a positive hemodynamic response (defined a priori) in eight (88.9%) and five (35.7%) patients. Eight studies reported a reduction in NEE dose at hour 12 after angiotensin II administration and one study noted a 100% reduction in NEE dose. Out of 47 patients with documented information, 13 patients had adverse outcomes which included hepatic injury (2), digital ischemia (1), ischemic optic neuropathy (1), ischemic colitis (2), agitated delirium (1), and thrombotic events (2). CONCLUSIONS: In this first systematic review of angiotensin II in CS, we note the early clinical experience. Angiotensin II was associated with improvements in MAP, decrease in vasopressor requirements, and minimal reported adverse events.

Myocardial effects of angiotensin II compared to norepinephrine in an animal model of septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II is one of the vasopressors available for use in septic shock. However, its effects on the septic myocardium remain unclear. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of angiotensin II and norepinephrine on cardiac function and myocardial oxygen consumption, inflammation and injury in experimental septic shock. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, controlled study was performed in 20 anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs. Septic shock was induced by fecal peritonitis in 16 animals, and four pigs served as shams. Resuscitation with fluids, antimicrobial therapy and abdominal drainage was initiated one hour after the onset of septic shock. Septic pigs were randomly allocated to receive one of the two drugs to maintain mean arterial pressure between 65 and 75 mmHg for 8 h. RESULTS: There were no differences in MAP, cardiac output, heart rate, fluid balance or tissue perfusion indices in the two treatment groups but myocardial oxygen consumption was greater in the norepinephrine-treated animals. Myocardial mRNA expression of interleukin-6, interleukin-6 receptor, interleukin-1 alpha, and interleukin-1 beta was higher in the norepinephrine than in the angiotensin II group. CONCLUSIONS: In septic shock, angiotensin II administration is associated with a similar level of cardiovascular resuscitation and less myocardial oxygen consumption, and inflammation compared to norepinephrine.

Prevention of sudden death in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: do we still need an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention?

Sudden death is a devastating complication of heart failure (HF). Current guidelines recommend an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for prevention of sudden death in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) specifically those with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% after at least 3 months of optimized HF treatment. The benefit of ICD in patients with symptomatic HFrEF caused by coronary artery disease has been well documented; however, the evidence for a benefit of prophylactic ICD implantation in patients with HFrEF of non-ischaemic aetiology is less strong. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers (BB), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) block the deleterious actions of angiotensin II, norepinephrine, and aldosterone, respectively. Neprilysin inhibition potentiates the actions of endogenous natriuretic peptides that mitigate adverse ventricular remodelling. BB, MRA, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) have a favourable effect on reduction of sudden cardiac death in HFrEF. Recent data suggest a beneficial effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in reducing serious ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in patients with HFrEF. So, in the current era of new drugs for HFrEF and with the optimal use of disease-modifying therapies (BB, MRA, ARNI and SGLT2i), we might need to reconsider the need and timing for use of ICD as primary prevention of sudden death, especially in HF of non-ischaemic aetiology.

Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers as Potential Therapeutic Options for Pancreatic Cancer.

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been reported to have a role in carcinogenesis, and therefore it may be of value as a potential therapeutic target in inhibiting tumor growth. It has been shown that inhibition of RAS via angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II type-1 receptor (ARBs) inhibitors may have a protective effect against several malignancies. Here, we provide an overview of the potential value of the RAS pathway and targeting via ACE/ARB inhibitors in pancreatic cancer. Whilst the potential role of RAS as a target for the treatment of pancreatic cancer has been reported, the use of candesartan with gemcitabine failed to improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer. Another study of 1-3 years using ARB was found to reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer. In line with these trials, others have demonstrated that the ARBs in combination with gemcitabine might improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Prospective trials are warranted to investigate this hypothesis.

Angiotensin II and Vasopressin for Vasodilatory Shock: A Critical Appraisal of Catecholamine-Sparing Strategies.

Vasodilatory shock is a serious medical condition that increases the morbidity and mortality of perioperative and critically ill patients. Norepinephrine is an established first-line therapy for this condition, but at high doses, it may lead to diminishing returns. Oftentimes, secondary noncatecholamine agents are required in those whose hypotension persists. Angiotensin II and vasopressin are both noncatecholamine agents available for the treatment of hypotension in vasodilatory shock. They have distinct modes of action and unique pharmacologic properties when compared to norepinephrine. Angiotensin II and vasopressin have shown promise in certain subsets of the population, such as those with acute kidney injury, high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, or those receiving cardiac surgery. Any benefit from these drugs must be weighed against the risks, as overall mortality has not been shown to decrease mortality in the general population. The aims of this narrative review are to provide insight into the historical use of noncatecholamine vasopressors and to compare and contrast their unique modes of action, physiologic rationale for administration, efficacy, and safety profiles.

Angiotensin II for Critically Ill Patients With Shock After Heart Transplant.

Patients undergoing heart transplant are at high risk for vasodilatory shock in the postoperative period, due to a combination of vascular dysfunction from end-stage heart failure and inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass and, increasingly, long-term exposure to nonpulsatile blood flow in those who have received a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant. Patients who have this vasoplegic syndrome, which may be refractory to traditional agents used in the treatment of shock, are vulnerable to organ dysfunction and death. Angiotensin II (ANG-2) is of increasing interest as an adjunct to traditional therapy, both for improvement in blood pressure and for sparing the use of high-dose catecholamine vasopressors. This case series describes the use of ANG-2 in 4 clinical scenarios for the treatment of shock due to heart transplant surgery, supporting its use in this role and justifying further prospective studies to clarify the appropriate place for ANG-2 in the hierarchy of adjunctive therapies.

Use of Angiotensin II in Severe Vasoplegia After Left Pneumonectomy Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Renin Response Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Describe a case of post-pneumonectomy vasoplegia managed with angiotensin II. Plasma renin activity was measured at specific time intervals to describe the relationship between endogenous renin activity and exogenous angiotensin II supplementation. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Spectrum Health Cardiothoracic Critical Care Unit. PATIENTS: Fifty-seven-year-old male. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma renin activity at five pre-determined time points. Angiotensin II caused a significant increase in mean arterial pressure and a rapid reduction in catecholamine vasopressor doses from 0.75 to 0.31 mcg/kg/min norepinephrine equivalents. Plasma renin activity drawn immediately before angiotensin II initiation was 40 ng/mL/hr (normal, 0.6-3.0 ng/mL/hr) with resultant drop to 22 and 12 ng/mL/hr at 2 and 6 hours after angiotensin II initiation, respectively. The patient suffered no end-organ damage and achieved a positive outcome, discharging home on postoperative day 11. CONCLUSION: Exogenous angiotensin II reduced catecholamine vasopressor doses and had an apparent effect in reducing endogenous renin production in this case. Prospective research is warranted to determine the utility of angiotensin II and to better understand it effects on the dysfunctional renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system during vasoplegic shock.

Angiotensin II for the treatment of septic shock in a neutropenic patient with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Mortality remains high in septic shock with few new treatment options. Angiotensin II has been recently approved for use in septic shock due to promising results in the ATHOS-3 trial. However, patients with neutropenia were excluded in the trial. This patient population is becoming increasingly common in the intensive care unit as there is an increase in novel biologic therapies and stem cell transplantations for haematological and solid organ malignancies. We present a case of a patient with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who received chemotherapy, resulting in neutropenia and septic shock. There was persistent hypotension despite initiating multiple conventional vasopressors. Angiotensin II was attempted with immediate improvement in the blood pressure which resulted in weaning of other vasopressors. This positive haemodynamic response suggests that angiotensin II can successfully be used in neutropenic patients without increasing the overall catecholamine burden of septic shock.

Vasoplegic syndrome following cardiothoracic surgery-review of pathophysiology and update of treatment options.

Vasoplegic syndrome is a common occurrence following cardiothoracic surgery and is characterized as a high-output shock state with poor systemic vascular resistance. The pathophysiology is complex and includes dysregulation of vasodilatory and vasoconstrictive properties of smooth vascular muscle cells. Specific bypass machine and patient factors play key roles in occurrence. Research into treatment of this syndrome is limited and extrapolated primarily from that pertaining to septic shock, but is evolving with the expanded use of catecholamine-sparing agents. Recent reports demonstrate potential benefit in novel treatment options, but large clinical trials are needed to confirm.

Sepsis 2019: What Surgeons Need to Know.

The definition of sepsis continues to be as dynamic as the management strategies used to treat this. Sepsis-3 has replaced the earlier systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)-based diagnoses with the rapid Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score assisting in predicting overall prognosis with regards to mortality. Surgeons have an important role in ensuring adequate source control while recognizing the threat of carbapenem-resistance in gram-negative organisms. Rapid diagnostic tests are being used increasingly for the early identification of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs), with a key emphasis on the multidisciplinary alert of results. Novel, higher generation antibiotic agents have been developed for resistance in ESKCAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) organisms while surgeons have an important role in the prevention of spread. The Study to Optimize Peritoneal Infection Therapy (STOP-IT) trial has challenged the previous paradigm of length of antibiotic treatment whereas biomarkers such as procalcitonin are playing a prominent role in individualizing therapy. Several novel therapies for refractory septic shock, while still investigational, are gaining prominence rapidly (such as vitamin C) whereas others await further clinical trials. Management strategies presented as care bundles continue to be updated by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, yet still remain controversial in its global adoption. We have broadened our temporal and epidemiologic perspective of sepsis by understanding it both as an acute, time-sensitive, life-threatening illness to a chronic condition that increases the risk of mortality up to five years post-discharge. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and bedside scoring systems can assist the clinician in predicting post-operative sepsis. The public health role of the surgeon is key. This includes collaboration and multi-disciplinary antibiotic stewardship at a hospital level. It also requires controlling pharmaceutical sales and the unregulated dispensing of antibiotic agents globally through policy initiatives to control emerging resistance through prevention.

Another Role for Angiotensin II?: Vasopressin-Refractory Shock After Pheochromocytoma Resection: A Case Report.

A patient presented with multiple unrelated tumors and was found to have a small but functional adrenal pheochromocytoma. After pheochromocytoma resection, shock developed unresponsive to vasopressin in recommended doses (0.04 U/min infusion plus repeated 1-U boluses) but responded dramatically to an angiotensin II infusion (20 ng/kg/min) with a mean arterial pressure >100 mm Hg. The patient's blood pressure was maintained for 42 hours postoperatively with an infusion rate that ranged from 2 to 38 ng/kg/min. Because vasopressin may not always be effective for postresection shock in people with pheochromocytomas, angiotensin II may prove to be an effective alternative.

Ang-(1-7) treatment attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced early pulmonary fibrosis.

Early pulmonary fibrosis is the leading cause of poor prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, whether the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) can serve as a therapeutic target is unknown. In this study, an animal model of early pulmonary fibrosis was established via the LPS three-hit regimen. Afterwards, the animals were treated with intraperitoneal injections of Ang-(1-7), AVE0991, or A779 once per day for 20 days. The plasma and BALF AngII levels of the animals were increased, while there were no significant changes in Ang-(1-7) levels in lung tissue after LPS treatment. Furthermore, the AT1R protein levels were significantly increased and the Mas levels were significantly decreased on days 14 and 21. Administration of Ang-(1-7) downregulated LPS-induced AT1R mRNA expression, which was upregulated by A779. The expression of Mas mRNA responded in the opposite direction relative to AT1R. Moreover, LPS caused decreased levels of Mas and E-cadherin and increased AT1R, Vimentin, and Src phosphorylation levels. Ang-(1-7) or AVE0991 blocked these effects but was counteracted by A779 treatment. Our findings suggested that AngII and AT1R levels exhibit opposite dynamic trends during LPS-induced early pulmonary fibrosis, as do Ang-(1-7) and Mas. Ang-(1-7) exerts protective effects against early pulmonary fibrosis, mainly by regulating the balance between AngII and AT1R and between Ang-(1-7) and Mas and by inhibiting Src kinase activation.

Sepsis - What's new in 2019?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sepsis-3 guidelines have implications in a deeper understanding of the biopathology of the disease. Further, the review focuses on timely topics and new literature on fluid resuscitation, the value of steroids in sepsis, and new therapeutic options such as angiotensin II, vitamin C, and thiamine as well as the emerging role of procalcitonin (PCT) in managing antibiotics. RECENT FINDINGS: Traditional therapies such as type of crystalloid fluid administration and steroid therapy for sepsis are currently under re-evaluation. Angiotensin II is investigated for reversing vasodilatory shock. The role of capillary endothelium leak and cellular metabolism can be affected by vitamin C and thiamine levels. Biomarker level trends, specifically PCT, can aid clinical suspicion of infection. SUMMARY: Sepsis-3 shifts the focus from a noninfectious inflammatory process and an emphasis on a dysregulated host response to infection. Hyperchloremic crystalloid resuscitation is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Steroid administration can reverse shock physiology; however, mortality benefits remain uncertain. Angiotensin II, vitamin C, and thiamine are novel treatment options that need further validation. PCT assays can help discern between infectious and noninfectious inflammation.

The renin angiotensin system (RAS) mediates bifunctional growth regulation in melanoma and is a novel target for therapeutic intervention.

Despite emergence of new systemic therapies, metastatic melanoma remains a challenging and often fatal form of skin cancer. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a major physiological regulatory pathway controlling salt-water equilibrium, intravascular volume and blood pressure. Biological effects of the RAS are mediated by the vasoactive hormone angiotensin II (AngII) via two receptor subtypes, AT1R (encoded by AGTR1) and AT2R (encoded by AGTR2). We report decreasing expression and increasing CpG island methylation of AGTR1 in metastatic versus primary melanoma and detection in serum of methylated genomic DNA from the AGTR1 CpG island in metastatic melanoma implying that AGTR1 encodes a tumour suppressor function in melanoma. Consistent with this hypothesis, antagonism of AT1R using losartan or shRNA-mediated knockdown in melanoma cell lines expressing AGTR1 resulted in acquisition of the ability to proliferate in serum-free conditions. Conversely, ectopic expression of AGTR1 in cell lines lacking endogenous expression inhibits proliferation irrespective of the presence of AngII implying a ligand-independent suppressor function for AT1R. Treatment of melanoma cell lines expressing endogenous AT2R with either AngII or the AT2R-selective agonist Y6AII induces proliferation in serum-free conditions whereas the AT2R-specific antagonists PD123319 and EMA401 inhibit melanoma growth and angiogenesis and potentiate inhibitors of BRAF and MEK in cells with BRAF V600 mutations. Our results demonstrate that the RAS has both oncogenic and tumour suppressor functions in melanoma. Pharmacological inhibition of AT2R may provide therapeutic opportunities in melanomas expressing this receptor and AGTR1 CpG island methylation in serum may serve as a novel biomarker of metastatic melanoma.