[The importance of the logistic warehouse in pandemic period: the experience of the USL Umbria 1 (Perugia, Italy) during covid-19.] / L'importanza del magazzino logistico in periodo di pandemia: l'esperienza dell'USL Umbria 1 durante covid-19.

The pandemic period has generated major problems in the pharmacies of hospitals and local health care companies regarding the distribution of drugs to patients undergoing treatment with chronic drugs. This is because the patient, during the lockdown, was forced to leave the house and go several miles away to reach the place where the drug was dispensed. Moreover, very often, the place was placed in covid-19 hospitals, like the one in Perugia, and was also a risk for the patient himself. The logistical organization allows, in addition to the advantages of traceability, efficiency and savings, with the arrival of the drug at home, a very high patient compliance that also translates into greater security in a pandemic period. To the Usl Umbria 1 of Perugia (Italy) has been centralized the activity of warehouse for all the South area that includes three hospitals and four sanitary districts. Such warehouse, through computerized procedure, guarantees the direct distribution with sending of the medicines directly to the district of belonging of the patient. In this way the patient was not forced to make long and risky trips to continue their chronic therapies. Moreover, this logistic warehouse has also allowed to cope with the correct management of many medicinal specialties that have been used against the SARS-CoV-2 virus avoiding their temporary deficiency for patients already on therapy according to the normal therapeutic indications (anti-inflammatory, antiretroviral and immunomodulatory). This paper aims to demonstrate how logistical organization is of vital importance for a National Health System that has to face increasing costs, ensure the traceability of all processes and, last but not least, survive a worldwide pandemic period.

Prevalence of use and sources of antihypertensive medicine in Brazil: an analysis of the VIGITEL telephone survey. / Prevalência de uso e fontes de obtenção de medicamentos anti-hipertensivos no Brasil: análise do inquérito telefônico VIGITEL.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of hypertension in Brazil and worldwide has been increasing in recent decades, and drug therapy is one of the strategies used to control this condition. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of use and identify the sources for obtaining antihypertensive drugs in Brazil, according to sociodemographic variables, comparing three periods: 2011, 2014 and 2017. METHODS: Data from individuals aged ≥20 years who reported a medical diagnosis of hypertension, interviewed by Vigitel in 2011, 2014 and 2017 were used. Frequency and prevalence of drug use in addition to the sources for obtaining medication were estimated by sociodemographic variables, with 95% confidence intervals. The differences between proportions were verified by Pearson's chi-square test (Rao-Scott), with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The prevalence of antihypertensive drug use remained stable (80%). Regarding the sources for obtaining these medicines, there was variation in the period, indicating a decrease in usage through the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) (44.2% in 2011; 30.5% in 2017). This decrease was accompanied with increase in PFPB (16.1% in 2011; 29.9% in 2017). The prevalence of other sources for obtaining medicine (private pharmacies/drugstores) showed stability in the period. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of medication use remained high and there was a change in the pattern of use according to sources, demonstrating migration between SUS pharmacies to the PFPB, and suggesting a reduction in the availability of medicines from public pharmacies universally, and for free.

Prevalência de uso e fontes de obtenção de medicamentos anti-hipertensivos no Brasil: análise do inquérito telefônico VIGITEL / Prevalence of use and sources of antihypertensive medicine in Brazil: an analysis of the VIGITEL telephone survey

RESUMO: Objetivo: A prevalência de hipertensão arterial no Brasil e no mundo vem aumentando nas últimas décadas, sendo o uso de medicamentos uma das estratégias utilizadas no controle da doença. O objetivo deste estudo foi estimar a prevalência de uso e identificar as fontes de obtenção de anti-hipertensivos no Brasil, segundo variáveis sociodemográficas, comparando três períodos: 2011, 2014 e 2017. Métodos: Foram utilizados dados de indivíduos com idade ≥20 anos que referiram diagnóstico médico de hipertensão arterial, entrevistados pelo Vigitel nos anos de 2011, 2014 e 2017. Foi estimada a distribuição de frequências e as prevalências de uso de medicamentos, segundo variáveis sociodemográficas, de acordo com as fontes de obtenção, com intervalos de confiança de 95%. As diferenças entre as proporções foram verificadas pelo teste χ2 de Pearson (Rao-Scott), com nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: A prevalência de uso manteve-se estável (80%). Quanto às fontes de obtenção observou-se variação no período, indicando diminuição na obtenção por meio das Unidades de Saúde do SUS (44,2% em 2011; 30,5% em 2017). Esse decréscimo esteve acompanhado do aumento na obtenção pela Farmácia Popular (16,1% em 2011; 29,9% em 2017). A prevalência de obtenção por meio de farmácias privadas/drogarias mostrou estabilidade no período. Conclusões: A prevalência de uso de medicamentos se manteve alta e houve modificação no padrão de utilização segundo fontes de obtenção, evidenciando migração entre Unidades de Saúde do SUS para a Farmácia Popular, sugerindo redução da disponibilidade dos medicamentos pelas farmácias públicas de forma universal e gratuita.

ABSTRACT: Objective: The prevalence of hypertension in Brazil and worldwide has been increasing in recent decades, and drug therapy is one of the strategies used to control this condition. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of use and identify the sources for obtaining antihypertensive drugs in Brazil, according to sociodemographic variables, comparing three periods: 2011, 2014 and 2017. Methods: Data from individuals aged ≥20 years who reported a medical diagnosis of hypertension, interviewed by Vigitel in 2011, 2014 and 2017 were used. Frequency and prevalence of drug use in addition to the sources for obtaining medication were estimated by sociodemographic variables, with 95% confidence intervals. The differences between proportions were verified by Pearson's chi-square test (Rao-Scott), with a significance level of 5%. Results: The prevalence of antihypertensive drug use remained stable (80%). Regarding the sources for obtaining these medicines, there was variation in the period, indicating a decrease in usage through the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) (44.2% in 2011; 30.5% in 2017). This decrease was accompanied with increase in PFPB (16.1% in 2011; 29.9% in 2017). The prevalence of other sources for obtaining medicine (private pharmacies/drugstores) showed stability in the period. Conclusions: The prevalence of medication use remained high and there was a change in the pattern of use according to sources, demonstrating migration between SUS pharmacies to the PFPB, and suggesting a reduction in the availability of medicines from public pharmacies universally, and for free.

Access to and use of high blood pressure medications in Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the access to and use of medicines for high blood pressure among the Brazilian population according to social and demographic conditions. METHODS: Analysis of data from Pesquisa Nacional Sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos (PNAUM - National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines), a nationwide cross-sectional, population-based study, with probability sampling, carried out between September 2013 and February 2014 in urban households in the five Brazilian regions. The study evaluated the access and use of medicines to treat people with high blood pressure. The independent variables were gender, age, socioeconomic status and Brazilian region. The study also described the most commonly used drugs and the percentage of people treated with one, two, three or more drugs. Point estimations and confidence intervals were calculated considering the sample weights and sample complex plan. RESULTS: Prevalence of high blood pressure was 23.7% (95%CI 22.8-24.6). Regarding people with this condition, 93.8% (95%CI 92.8-94.8) had indication for drug therapy and, of those, 94.6% (95%CI 93.5-95.5) were using the medication at the time of interview. Full access to medicines was 97.9% (95%CI 97.3-98.4); partial access, 1.9% (95%CI 1.4-2.4); and no access, 0.2% (95%CI 0.1-0.4). The medication used to treat high blood pressure, 56.0% (95%CI 52.6-59.2) were obtained from SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System), 16.0% (95%CI 14.3-17.9) from Popular Pharmacy Program, 25.7% (95%CI 23.4-28.2) were paid for by the patients themselves and 2.3% (95%CI 1.8-2.9) were obtained from other locations. The five most commonly used drugs were, in descending order, hydrochlorothiazide, losartan, captopril, enalapril and atenolol. Of the total number of patients on treatment, 36.1% (95%CI 34.1-37.1) were using two medicines and 13.5% (95%CI 12.3-14.9) used three or more. CONCLUSIONS: Access to medicines for the treatment of high blood pressure may be considered high and many of them are available free of charge. The most commonly used drugs are among those recommended as first-line treatment for high blood pressure control. The percentage of people using more than one drug seems to follow the behavior observed in other countries. OBJETIVO: Analisar o acesso e a utilização de medicamentos para a hipertensão na população brasileira segundo condições sociais e demográficas. Análise dos dados da Pesquisa Nacional Sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos, estudo nacional de delineamento transversal de base populacional, com amostra probabilística, realizado entre setembro de 2013 e fevereiro de 2014 em domicílios urbanos nas cinco regiões do Brasil. Avaliou-se o uso e acesso aos medicamentos para os cuidados com pessoas que apresentam hipertensão arterial. As variáveis independentes utilizadas foram sexo, idade, nível socioeconômico e região do País. Também foram descritos os fármacos mais utilizados e a proporção de pessoas tratadas com um, dois, três ou mais fármacos. As estimativas de ponto e os intervalos de confiança foram calculados considerando os pesos amostrais e o plano complexo da amostra. A prevalência de hipertensão arterial foi de 23,7% (IC95% 22,8-24,6). Das pessoas com a condição, 93,8% (IC95% 92,8-94,8) tinham indicação de tratamento com medicamentos e, destes, 94,6% (IC95% 93,5-95,5) estavam usando os medicamentos no momento da entrevista. O acesso total aos medicamentos foi de 97,9% (IC95% 97,3-98,4); o acesso parcial, de 1,9% (IC95% 1,4-2,4); e o acesso nulo, de 0,2% (IC95% 0,1-0,4). Dos medicamentos utilizados para tratar a hipertensão, 56,0% (IC95% 52,6-59,2) foram obtidos no SUS, 16,0% (IC95% 14,3-17,9), no Programa Farmácia Popular, 25,7% (IC95% 23,4-28,2) pago do próprio bolso e 2,3% (IC95% 1,8-2,9) em outros locais. Os cinco fármacos mais utilizados foram, em ordem descrente, hidroclorotiazida, losartana, captopril, enalapril e atenolol. Do total de tratados, 36,1% (IC95% 34,1-37,1) estavam usando dois fármacos e 13,5% (IC95% 12,3-14,9) utilizavam três ou mais fármacos. CONCLUSÕES: : O acesso aos medicamentos para tratamento da hipertensão pode ser considerado elevado e grande parte desses medicamentos é obtida gratuitamente. Os fármacos mais utilizados estão entre os preconizados como de primeira linha para o controle de hipertensão arterial. A proporção de pessoas utilizando mais de um fármaco parece seguir o comportamento observado em outros países.

Obtenção de medicamentos para hipertensão e diabetes no Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil: resultados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013 / Obtaining drugs for hypertension and diabetes through the Brazilian People's Pharmacy Program: results of the National Health Survey, 2013 / Obtención de medicamentos para hipertensión y diabetes en el programa Farmacia Popular de Brasil: resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud, 2013

OBJETIVO: descrever a proporção de hipertensos e diabéticos que referiram obter medicamentos para controle dessas doenças no Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil (PFPB), segundo características sociodemográficas. MÉTODOS: estudo descritivo de base populacional, com indivíduos adultos (18 anos ou mais), sobre dados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde (PNS) 2013. RESULTADOS: cerca de um terço dos indivíduos hipertensos (35,9% - IC95% 34,1;37,7) e mais da metade dos diabéticos (57,4% - IC95% 54,2;60,2) obtiveram pelo menos um medicamento no PFPB, com algumas diferenças entre as grandes regiões brasileiras; para os diabéticos, foram encontradas maiores proporções de obtenção de medicamentos pelo PFPB por indivíduos de cor preta (69,4% - IC95% 60,8;77,9) e com menor nível de escolaridade (≤8 anos de estudo) (63,9% - IC95% 60,2;67,7), sem diferenças significativas entre os grupos etários e sexos. CONCLUSÃO: a obtenção de pelo menos um medicamento para tratamento da hipertensão e diabetes pelo PFPB foi elevada, especialmente nos segmentos menos favorecidos socioeconomicamente.

OBJECTIVE: to describe the proportion of hypertensive and diabetic patients who reported getting medicines to control these diseases via the Brazilian People's Pharmacy Program, according to sociodemographic factors. METHODS: this was a population-based descriptive study using 2013 National Health Survey data on individuals aged over 18 years. RESULTS: around one third of hypertensive individuals (35.9%; 95%CI 34.1-37.7) and more than half of those with diabetes (57.4%; 95%CI 54.2-60.2%) had got at least one kind of medication via the Program, there being some differences between the country's regions. Among patients with diabetes, higher rates of getting medication were found in black people (69.4%; 95%CI 60.8-77.9) and those with less schooling (0-8 years) (63.9%; 95%CI 60.2-67.7), with no significant differences between age groups or sex. CONCLUSION: obtaining at least one kind of medication to treat hypertension and diabetes via the Program was high, especially among the underprivileged.

OBJETIVO: describir la proporción de hipertensos y diabéticos que reportaron conseguir medicamentos para controlar estas enfermedades en el Programa Farmacia Popular de Brasil (PFPB), de acuerdo con factores sociodemográficos. MÉTODOS: estudio descriptivo poblacional, con individuos adultos (18 años o más), con datos de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud (PNS) 2013. RESULTADOS: cerca de un tercio de los individuos hipertensos (35,9%; IC95% 34,1-37,7) y más de la mitad de los diabéticos (57,4%; IC95% 54,2-60,2) obtuvieron al menos un medicamento en el PFPB, con diferencias entre las regiones; entre los diabéticos se encontraron mayores proporciones de obtención de medicamentos por el PFPB en individuos negros (69,4%; IC95% 60,8-77,9) y menor nivel de educación (≤8 años de estudio) (63,9%; IC95% 60,2-67,7), sin diferencias significativas entre los grupos etario o sexo. CONCLUSIÓN: la obtención de al menos un medicamento para el tratamiento de hipertensión y diabetes por el PFPB fui significativo, especialmente en los sectores menos favorecidos socioeconómicamente.

Access to and use of high blood pressure medications in Brazil / Acesso e uso de medicamentos para hipertensão arterial no Brasil

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the access to and use of medicines for high blood pressure among the Brazilian population according to social and demographic conditions. METHODS Analysis of data from Pesquisa Nacional Sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos (PNAUM – National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines), a nationwide cross-sectional, population-based study, with probability sampling, carried out between September 2013 and February 2014 in urban households in the five Brazilian regions. The study evaluated the access and use of medicines to treat people with high blood pressure. The independent variables were gender, age, socioeconomic status and Brazilian region. The study also described the most commonly used drugs and the percentage of people treated with one, two, three or more drugs. Point estimations and confidence intervals were calculated considering the sample weights and sample complex plan. RESULTS Prevalence of high blood pressure was 23.7% (95%CI 22.8–24.6). Regarding people with this condition, 93.8% (95%CI 92.8–94.8) had indication for drug therapy and, of those, 94.6% (95%CI 93.5–95.5) were using the medication at the time of interview. Full access to medicines was 97.9% (95%CI 97.3–98.4); partial access, 1.9% (95%CI 1.4–2.4); and no access, 0.2% (95%CI 0.1–0.4). The medication used to treat high blood pressure, 56.0% (95%CI 52.6–59.2) were obtained from SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System), 16.0% (95%CI 14.3–17.9) from Popular Pharmacy Program, 25.7% (95%CI 23.4–28.2) were paid for by the patients themselves and 2.3% (95%CI 1.8–2.9) were obtained from other locations. The five most commonly used drugs were, in descending order, hydrochlorothiazide, losartan, captopril, enalapril and atenolol. Of the total number of patients on treatment, 36.1% (95%CI 34.1–37.1) were using two medicines and 13.5% (95%CI 12.3–14.9) used three or more. CONCLUSIONS Access to medicines for the treatment of high blood pressure may be considered high and many of them are available free of charge. The most commonly used drugs are among those recommended as first-line treatment for high blood pressure control. The percentage of people using more than one drug seems to follow the behavior observed in other countries.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Analisar o acesso e a utilização de medicamentos para a hipertensão na população brasileira segundo condições sociais e demográficas. Análise dos dados da Pesquisa Nacional Sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos, estudo nacional de delineamento transversal de base populacional, com amostra probabilística, realizado entre setembro de 2013 e fevereiro de 2014 em domicílios urbanos nas cinco regiões do Brasil. Avaliou-se o uso e acesso aos medicamentos para os cuidados com pessoas que apresentam hipertensão arterial. As variáveis independentes utilizadas foram sexo, idade, nível socioeconômico e região do País. Também foram descritos os fármacos mais utilizados e a proporção de pessoas tratadas com um, dois, três ou mais fármacos. As estimativas de ponto e os intervalos de confiança foram calculados considerando os pesos amostrais e o plano complexo da amostra. A prevalência de hipertensão arterial foi de 23,7% (IC95% 22,8–24,6). Das pessoas com a condição, 93,8% (IC95% 92,8–94,8) tinham indicação de tratamento com medicamentos e, destes, 94,6% (IC95% 93,5–95,5) estavam usando os medicamentos no momento da entrevista. O acesso total aos medicamentos foi de 97,9% (IC95% 97,3–98,4); o acesso parcial, de 1,9% (IC95% 1,4–2,4); e o acesso nulo, de 0,2% (IC95% 0,1–0,4). Dos medicamentos utilizados para tratar a hipertensão, 56,0% (IC95% 52,6–59,2) foram obtidos no SUS, 16,0% (IC95% 14,3–17,9), no Programa Farmácia Popular, 25,7% (IC95% 23,4–28,2) pago do próprio bolso e 2,3% (IC95% 1,8–2,9) em outros locais. Os cinco fármacos mais utilizados foram, em ordem descrente, hidroclorotiazida, losartana, captopril, enalapril e atenolol. Do total de tratados, 36,1% (IC95% 34,1–37,1) estavam usando dois fármacos e 13,5% (IC95% 12,3–14,9) utilizavam três ou mais fármacos. CONCLUSÕES : O acesso aos medicamentos para tratamento da hipertensão pode ser considerado elevado e grande parte desses medicamentos é obtida gratuitamente. Os fármacos mais utilizados estão entre os preconizados como de primeira linha para o controle de hipertensão arterial. A proporção de pessoas utilizando mais de um fármaco parece seguir o comportamento observado em outros países.

Fontes de obtenção de medicamentos para hipertensão e diabetes no Brasil: resultados de inquérito telefônico nas capitais brasileiras e no Distrito Federal, 2011 / Sources of medicines for hypertension and diabetes in Brazil: telephone survey results from Brazilian state capitals and the Federal District, 2011 / Fuentes de obtención de medicamentos para la hipertensión y diabetes en Brasil: resultados de una encuesta telefónica en las capitales brasileñas y el Distrito Federal, 2011

Resumo Analisar as diferenças entre diabéticos e hipertensos em relação ao tratamento medicamentoso e suas fontes de obtenção. Trata-se de estudo transversal com dados do VIGITEL, realizado em 2011 nas capitais brasileiras. Cerca de 72% dos 15.027 hipertensos e 78,2% dos 4.083 diabéticos estavam em tratamento medicamentoso; 45,8% dos hipertensos obtiveram medicamento nas unidades de saúde públicas, 15,9% no Farmácia Popular e 38,3% em drogarias/farmácias e outras fontes. Entre os diabéticos, encontrou-se 54,4%; 16,2%; e 29,4%, respectivamente. Nas unidades de saúde os percentuais foram mais elevados entre os menos escolarizados, cor de pele preta ou parda e sem plano privado de saúde, e as prevalências de obtenção na Farmácia Popular, drogarias/farmácias e outras fontes foram mais elevadas entre os mais escolarizados, cor de pele branca e com plano privado. O acesso às diferentes fontes de medicamentos apresentou disparidades entre as regiões e capitais brasileiras e entre os segmentos sociais da população.

Abstract This study aimed to analyze differences between patients with diabetes and hypertension in drug treatment and their sources for obtaining medication. This was a cross-sectional study with data from the VIGITEL telephone survey in 2011 in Brazil’s state capitals and Federal District. Some 72% of the 15,027 hypertensive patients and 78.2% of the 4,083 diabetics were on medication; 45.8% of the hypertensive patients obtained their medications from public health units, 15.9% from the Popular Pharmacy program, and 38.3% from drugstores, pharmacies, and other sources. The rates among diabetics were 54.4%, 16.2%, and 29.4%, respectively. In the public health units the percentages were highest among individuals with less schooling, black or brown skin, and without private health plans, while the percentages in the Popular Pharmacy program and drugstores/pharmacies and other sources were higher among individuals with more schooling, white skin, and private health plans. Access to different sources of medicines showed disparities between Brazil’s regions and state capitals and between social segments of the population.

Resumen Analizar las diferencias entre los diabéticos e hipertensos, en relación con el tratamiento farmacológico y sus fuentes de obtención. Se trata de un estudio transversal con datos de VIGITEL del 2011 en capitales brasileñas. Cerca del 72% de los 15.027 hipertensos y el 78,2% de los 4.083 diabéticos estaban en tratamiento; un 45,8% de los pacientes hipertensos contaba con la medicación en las unidades de salud; 15,9% en farmacias populares; y un 38,3% en farmacias y otras fuentes y entre los diabéticos, 54,4%; 16,2%; y 29,4%, respectivamente. En las unidades de salud los porcentajes fueron más altos entre los menos educados, color de piel negro/mulato y sin plan de salud, mientras que la obtención en Farmacia Popular y otras fuentes fueron más altas entre los más educados, de piel blanca y con el plan privado. El acceso a diferentes fuentes de obtención mostró diferencias entre las regiones y las capitales brasileñas y segmentos sociales de la población.

A community-driven hypertension treatment group in rural Honduras.

BACKGROUND: We formed a self-funded hypertension treatment group in a resource-poor community in rural Honduras. After training community health workers and creating protocols for standardized treatment, we used group membership fees to maintain the group, purchase generic medications in bulk on the local market, and hire a physician to manage treatment. We then assessed whether participation in the group improved treatment, medication adherence, and hypertension control. DESIGN: This is a program evaluation using quasi-experimental design and no control group. Using data from the 86 members of the hypertension treatment group, we analyzed baseline and follow-up surveys of members, along with 30 months of clinical records of treatment, medication adherence, and blood pressure readings. RESULTS: Our initial hypertension needs assessment revealed that at baseline, community hypertensives relied on the local Ministry of Health clinic as their source of anti-hypertensive medications and reported that irregular supply interfered with medication adherence. At baseline, hypertension group members were mainly female, overweight or obese, physically active, non-smoking, and non-drinking. After 30 months of managing the treatment group, we found a significant increase in medication adherence, from 54.8 to 76.2% (p<0.01), and hypertension control (<140/90 mmHg), from 31.4 to 54.7% (p<0.01). We also found a mean monthly decrease of 0.39 mmHg in systolic blood pressure (p<0.01). At the end of the 30-month observation period, the local Ministry of Health system had increased provision of low-cost anti-hypertensive medications and adopted the hypertension treatment group's treatment protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Formation of a self-funded, community-based hypertension treatment group in a rural, resource-poor community is feasible, and group participation may improve treatment, medication adherence, and hypertension control and can serve as a political driver for improving hypertension treatment services provided by the public system.

[Gaps between prescription of anti-hypertensive and hypertension control in older adults of Buenos Aires suburbs]. / Brechas entre la prescripción de antihipertensivos y el control de la hipertensión en adultos mayores de los CAPS del conurbano bonaerense.

BACKGROUND: Medications delivered to primary care centers (PCC) all over the country through the Remediar program (RP) covers 80% of the most prevalent diseases. Among them, the prevalence of hypertension is 77% of 65 years or older. OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacological treatment and its appropriateness, and to understand needs and barriers among hypertensive beneficiaries of RP at Buenos Aires suburbs. Method Qualitative-quantitative triangulation: cross-sectional study with revision of medical records (MR) and in-depth interviews between December/2008 and February/2009 to hypertensive patients of 65 years or older and CAPS's staff. Prevalence of correct treatment (CT); appropriate Indication (AI); Optimal control (OC) were analyzed. RESULTS: The following PCCs were selected: Moreno, Tigre, Lomas de Zamora, Lanus and San Isidro. Prevalence of: CT: (10.2%; 95%CI 6,7-15,1); AI: (84.8%; 95% CI 80-89 ), and OC: 11,6% (95%CI 7-16) and OC among patients with good registry: 35.7% (95%CI 24,9-48,1). Eighty two % of patients received a prescription for enalapril. Deficient registry was detected in MR. Interviewees expressed difficulties in accessing treatment, lack of medication and use of alternative circuits to get them. Both, staff and patients were exposed to barriers generated by CAPSs and RP. CONCLUSIONS: A low degree of blood pressure control was observed, even with adequate prescription. Multifactorial problems explain several barriers to access and maintain hypertension treatment.

Preços e disponibilidade de medicamentos no Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil / Precios y disponibilidad de medicamentos en el Programa Farmacia Popular de Brasil / Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program

OBJETIVO: Analisar o desempenho do Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil perante os setores público e privado, em relação a: disponibilidade, preço e custo, para o paciente, de medicamentos para hipertensão e diabetes. MÉTODOS: Foi utilizada a metodologia desenvolvida pela Organização Mundial da Saúde em conjunto com a Ação Internacional para Saúde, para comparação de preços e disponibilidade de medicamentos. A pesquisa foi aplicada em maio de 2007, em estabelecimentos de diferentes setores [público, privado e as modalidades própria (FPB-P) e expansão (FPB-E) do Programa], em 30 municípios do Brasil. Os quatro medicamentos analisados foram: captopril 25mg e hidroclorotiazida 25mg, para hipertensão, e metformina 500mg e glibenclamida 5mg, para diabetes. RESULTADOS: O FPB-E apresentou maior disponibilidade de medicamentos e o setor público, a menor. Tanto no setor público quanto na FPB-P o percentual de disponibilidade de similares foi maior que o de genéricos...

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the performance of the Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil (FPB - Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program) in the public and private sectors, in terms of availability and cost of medicines for hypertension and diabetes. METHODS: The methodology developed by the World Health Organization, in partnership with the Health Action International, was used to compare medicines prices and availability. This study was performed in May 2007, in different sectors (public, private and the Program's government-managed [FPB-P] and private-sector-managed [FPB-E] categories), in 30 cities in Brazil. A total of four medicines were analyzed: captopril 25mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25mg for hypertension; and metformin 500mg and glibenclamide 5mg for diabetes. RESULTS: FPB-E showed greatest medicine availability, while the public sector the lowest. The percentage of availability of similar medicines was higher than that of generic medicines, both in the public sector and in the FPB-P...

OBJETIVO: Analizar el desempeño del Programa Farmacia Popular de Brasil frente a los sectores público y privado, con relación a: disponibilidad, precio y costo para el paciente, de medicamentos para hipertensión y diabetes. MÉTODOS: Fue utilizada la metodología desarrollada por la Organización Mundial de la Salud en conjunto con la Acción Internacional para Salud, para comparar los precios y la disponibilidad de medicamentos. La investigación fue aplicada en mayo de 2007, en establecimientos de diferentes sectores [público, privado y las modalidades propia (FPB-P) y expansión (FPB-E) del Programa], en 30 municipios de Brasil. Los cuatro medicamentos analizados fueron: captopril 25 mg e hidroclorotiazida 25 mg, para hipertensión, y metformina 500 mg y glibenclamida 5 mg, para diabetes. RESULTADOS: El FPB-E presentó mayor disponibilidad de medicamentos y el sector público, la menor. Tanto en el sector público como en la FPB-P el porcentaje de disponibilidad de similares fue mayor que el de los genéricos...

Free access to hypertension and diabetes medicines among the elderly: a reality yet to be constructed.

The study evaluated free access to hypertension and diabetes medicines and the reasons reported for lack of access. The sample included 4,003 elderly people living in Primary Care Unit coverage areas from 41 Southern and Northeastern Brazilian cities. Free access was higher in the Northeast (62.4%). The strategy of the Family Health Program (Programa Saúde da Família - PSF) was more effective in providing access than the traditional model, with higher results in the Northeast (61.2%) than in the South (39.6%). Around 20% of medicines included in the Hypertension and Diabetes Program and 26% of those included in the National Essential Medicines List (RENAME) were paid out of pocket. In the Northeast, 25% of insulin and 32% of oral antidiabetics were paid out of pocket. Unavailability in the public sector and a lack of money determined the lack of access. Although the PSF, Hypertension and Diabetes Program and RENAME expanded free access, supplies were insufficient. A greater connection between programs and a clear definition of responsibilities can improve medicine acquisition process, increasing the effectiveness of pharmaceutical assistance.

Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the performance of the Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil (FPB - Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program) in the public and private sectors, in terms of availability and cost of medicines for hypertension and diabetes. METHODS: The methodology developed by the World Health Organization, in partnership with the Health Action International, was used to compare medicines prices and availability. This study was performed in May 2007, in different sectors (public, private and the Program's government-managed [FPB-P] and private-sector-managed [FPB-E] categories), in 30 cities in Brazil. A total of four medicines were analyzed: captopril 25mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25mg for hypertension; and metformin 500mg and glibenclamide 5mg for diabetes. RESULTS: FPB-E showed greatest medicine availability, while the public sector the lowest. The percentage of availability of similar medicines was higher than that of generic medicines, both in the public sector and in the FPB-P. Comparison of prices among sectors showed a lower purchase price in the FPB-E, followed by the FPB-P. The FPB-E charged prices that were over 90% cheaper than those in the private sector. The number of working days required to obtain treatment for hypertension and diabetes were fewer in the FPB-E. CONCLUSIONS: The lower availability found in the public sector could be one of the reasons for the migration of users from the public sector to the FPB. The high prices in the private sector also contribute for this Program to be an alternative of medicine access in Brazil.

Utilización de medicamentos antihipertensivos en el primer nilvel de atención condicionantes estructurares y desigualdades espaciales en Argentina / Use of antihypertensive drugs in the first nilvel estructurares conditioning service and spatial inequalities in Argentina

Objetivo. La hipertensión arterial es uno de los problemas de salud más prevalentes y el principal factor de riesgo para enfermedades cardiovasculares. El control de lahipertensión arterial se basa en la utilización regular de medicamentos específicos y seguros. En Argentina, esos medicamentos son suministrados por el Ministerio de Salud a través de un amplio Programa llamado REMEDIAR. Esta disertación analiza el efecto del ambiente y las características de la oferta de los servicios de salud delPrimer Nivel de Atención sobre la continuidad del tratamiento farmacológico requerido por esta patología crónica, entendida como una dimensión del acceso a medicamentos.Método. Se ajustó un modelo lineal generalizado para analizar la tasa de utilización de medicamentos de 4.492 Centros de Atención Primaria de Argentina (88% del total deconsultas médicas ambulatorias en el sector público), utilizando una distribución Binomial Negativa. La cantidad de personas hipertensas detectadas para cada servicioa partir de registros operativos se utilizó como offset del modelo. Se incluyeron covariables que caracterizan las capacidades de la oferta. Se ajustó además un modelo multinivel con efecto aleatorio para el nivel municipal y provincial para controlar losefectos por las condiciones ambientales, en especial la gestión política del nivel local y aspectos del contexto socio-económico. Resultados. La disponibilidad de electrocardiógrafo y de medicamentos predice significativamente la tasa de utilizaciónde medicamentos REMEDIAR. No resultaron significativas variables que caracterizan la estructura de la oferta en términos de disponibilidad de recurso médico especializado, funcionamiento en red y nivel de complejidad. La inclusión de un efecto aleatorio paraunidades espaciales contribuyó marginalmente a la disminución de la varianza observada, y prácticamente desaparece al incluir factores contextuales...

Objective. High blood pressure is one of the most prevalent health problems and the main risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. The control of hypertension is based on specific and effective drugs taken on a regular basis. In Argentina, those drugs are provided by the Health Ministry through a large program called REMEDIAR. This dissertation analyses both the effects of the environment and the characteristics of healthcare services on the continuity of pharmacological treatment, as a dimension of drug access. Method. A generalized linear model was fitted in order to analyze the number of treatments delivered by 4492 Primary Health Services in Argentine (88% oftotal ambulatory physician consultations in the public sector), using a NegativeBinomial distribution. The number of hypertensive patients detected by the health-care service registries was used as an offset. Variables indicating characteristics of health care provision were included. A multilevel model with random effect for the municipal and provincial level was used in order to assess the environmental effects, particularly those concerning local politics and contextual socio-economic aspects. Results. Electrocardiographs and drugs availability were significant predictors of the REMEDIARprovidedmedicines use rate. Variables that characterize health-care services such as specialized medical recourses availability, organization of reference and counterreference network and complexity level were not significant. The multilevel model decreased the residual variance. However, after including the contextual factorscharacterizing the spatial units the random effect was negligible. Conclusion. The main factors associated with utilization of anti-hypertensive drugs are the continuity of the drugs supply and the availability of basic diagnostics tools. Local circumstancespresent limited effect, negligible after including population distribution and poverty indicators...

The impact of available anti-glaucoma therapy on the volume and age profile of patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether new classes of glaucoma medication have influenced glaucoma filtration surgery over a 20-year period in the southeast region of Ireland. METHODS: All patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery between January 1986 and December 2005 in Waterford Regional Hospital were identified. The following data were recorded for each patient: age; sex; and type of filtration procedure. RESULTS: Over the 20-year study period two consultant ophthalmic surgeons performed a total of 760 glaucoma filtration procedures on patients aged over 20 years. The annual average number of glaucoma surgeries declined steadily, defined by availability of different topical anti-glaucoma medications, from an average of 23.75 surgeries per surgeon per year in the subperiod 1986-1995, to 21 in 1996, 20 in 1997, and 12.69 surgeries per surgeon per year in 1998-2005, these differences being statistically significant (general linear model, P<0.001). The age profile of patients did not change significantly over the course of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of patients requiring glaucoma filtration surgery under the care of two consultant ophthalmic surgeons decreased over the 20-year study period, an era in which three classes of anti-glaucoma medications were made available. However, an increase in the age profile of patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery during the same period was not observed. Further study is required to resolve whether introduction of the new topical anti-glaucoma medications has led to a real reduction in the demand for glaucoma filtration surgery, or has just led to the deferral of such a demand.

Metabolic syndrome patient compliance with drug treatment

OBJECTIVES: 1) To evaluate the compliance with drug treatment in patients with metabolic syndrome. 2) To determine association between access to and use of medicines, as well as the level of knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and compliance. INTRODUCTION: Low compliance has been one of the greatest challenges for the successful treatment of chronic diseases. Although this issue has been widely studied in patients with isolated hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia, compliance studies involving patients with these concomitant diseases or with metabolic syndrome diagnosis are scarce. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving patients who have been diagnosed with metabolic syndrome according to the IDF criteria. Patients were being treated in a Health-Medical School Center bound to the Public Brazilian Healthcare System. This study was conducted in two phases. Phase I was characterized by analyzing medical records and Phase II involved interviewing the patients. A variation of the Morisky-Green Test was used to evaluate compliance. Compliance was the dependent variable and the independent variables included access to medicines, the use of medicines and the level of knowledge concerning cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-three patients were identified as being eligible for Phase II, and 75 were included in the study. The average level of compliance was 5.44 points (standard deviation of 0.68), on a scale ranging from 1.00 to 6.00 points. There was no statistically meaningful association between independent variables and compliance. The level of patient knowledge of diet and dyslipidemia was considered to be low. CONCLUSIONS: Patients involved in this study exhibited a high level of compliance with drug treatment. Further research is needed to better elucidate the compliance behavior of patients who have been diagnosed with metabolic syndrome.

Effect of neighborhood social participation on individual use of hormone replacement therapy and antihypertensive medication: a multilevel analysis.

The authors investigated a possible contextual effect of neighborhood on individual use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and antihypertensive medication (AHM) and the impact of neighborhood social participation on individual use of these medications. They attempted to disentangle contextual from individual influences. Multilevel logistic regression modeling was used to analyze data on 15,456 women aged 45-73 years (first level) residing in 95 neighborhoods (second level) of the city of Malmö, Sweden (250,000 inhabitants) who participated in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (1991-1996). AHM use was studied among 7,558 participants with defined hypertension. Of the total variability in medication use in this population, only 1.7% (HRT) and 0.5% (AHM) was between neighborhoods. After adjustment for age, individual socioeconomic factors, individual low levels of social participation, and health and behavioral variables, no neighborhood effect on AHM use was found. However, women living in neighborhoods with low social participation were much less likely to use HRT (odds ratio = 0.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.21, 0.63), especially if they themselves experienced low social participation (synergy index, 1.53) or were immigrants (synergy index, 1.68). The Malmö neighborhoods were homogeneous with regard to HRT and especially AHM use. However, differences in neighborhood social participation affected HRT use independently of individual characteristics.

From policy to action: access to essential drugs for the treatment of hypertension in the Small Island States (SIS) of the South Pacific.

The existing acquisition cost for essential drugs in the Cook Islands, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Niue, Tuvalu, is sufficiently high to compromise equitable access to quality drug therapy. The difficulty of access is further compounded by problems of distance from drug manufacturers and suppliers, associated with inadequate transport and communication links. In some of the Small Island States of the Pacific, internal distribution challenges further reduce access to drugs for those people who live on the outer islands. Two management processes to address these problems which have successfully been used in the past, are the establishment of an essential drug list to guarantee consistent appropriate treatment, and the introduction of pooled or bulk purchasing in order to achieve economies of scale. The major non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the South Pacific include diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease. These diseases, in association with life-style factors of obesity and smoking result in significant morbidity and mortality. This paper demonstrates that collaboration in drug purchasing of a defined list of essential drugs for hypertension would be beneficial in the South Pacific, and that the process is a model for achievement of rational drug treatment for NCDs in isolated small economies.