Clinical and economic burden of severe asthma among US patients treated with biologic therapies.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe asthma may remain uncontrolled despite biologic therapy in addition to standard therapy, but this disease burden has not been quantified. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the clinical and economic burden in a US national sample. METHODS: Patients who have severe asthma with indicated biologic treatment (earliest use = index date) were selected from the MarketScan database between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2018. Inclusion criteria were continuous enrollment for 12 months postindex with a minimum of 2 biologic fills, greater than or equal to 12 years of age, evidence of medium- to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ß-agonist combination before the index, and absence of other respiratory diagnoses and malignancies. Disease exacerbations (used to classify asthma control), health care costs, and treatment characteristics were reported during the 12-month postindex period. RESULTS: The sample included 3262 biologic patients; 88% with anti-immunoglobulin E therapy (omalizumab) and 12% non-anti-immunoglobulin E (reslizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab). The mean age was 49 (±15) years; 64% were women. Prescriptions included inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ß-agonist (82%), systemic corticosteroids (76%), and leukotriene receptor antagonists (68%). Notably, 63% of patients presented greater than or equal to 1 asthma exacerbation (mean 1.3 per patient/year). Furthermore, 35% of patients were categorized as having controlled asthma, whereas 28% were suboptimally controlled and 29% were uncontrolled. Patients with uncontrolled disease had higher all-cause and asthma-related costs ($69,206 and $45,693, respectively) than patients with suboptimally controlled ($59,407 and $40,793, respectively) or controlled disease ($53,083 and $38,393, respectively). Furthermore, 62% of newly treated patients were persistent with their index biologic. CONCLUSION: Biologic therapies are effective in reducing exacerbations, but a substantial proportion of patients with severe asthma treated with current biologics continue to experience uncontrolled disease, highlighting a remaining unmet need for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.

Impact of a population-based asthma management program in France (Sophia Asthme): A matched controlled before-and-after quasi-experimental study using the French health insurance database (SNDS).

PURPOSE: Sophia Asthme (SA) is a chronic disease management program of the French national health insurance for adult patients with asthma. We evaluated the early impact of this intervention. METHODS: We conducted a matched controlled, before-and-after quasi-experimental study within the French Health Insurance Database (Système National Des Données de Santé [SNDS]). The SA program was implemented in a set of 18 Départements in France and targeted 18- to 44-year-old subjects, with at least two reimbursement dates for asthma drug therapy during the 12-month period prior to program targeting. Change in outcomes was assessed from the "before program" period (January-December 2014) to the "after program implementation" period (March 2015-February 2016) in the program group (eligible to SA program in the 18 Départements) and in the matched controlled group. The main outcome measure was the before-after change in proportion of subjects with a controllers/(controllers+relievers) ratio greater than 50%. RESULTS: Of the 99 578 subjects of the program group, 9225 (9.3%) actually participated in SA program. The program had no significant impact on the proportion of subjects with a ratio greater than 50%. However, subjects exposed to SA program were significantly more likely to be dispensed controller medications (OR = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07) and to sustain their use of these medications (OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.12). CONCLUSION: We did not demonstrate any significant impact of the program on the primary outcome. The modest yet encouraging findings of this early evaluation suggest the need for reformulation of the program and its evaluation.

Trends in the costs of drugs launched in the UK between 1981 and 2015: an analysis of the launch price of drugs in five disease areas.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the trend in the launch price of new drugs for five common health conditions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using data on new drugs launched in the UK between 1981 and 2015 for hypertension, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, schizophrenia and colorectal cancer. DATA AND SOURCES: All drugs marketed in the UK between 1981 and 2015 (inclusive), and licensed specifically for the treatment of one of the five chosen conditions were included in the study. Newly launched medicines and their launch prices were identified by hand-searching all editions of the British National Formulary in addition to searching the websites of relevant regulatory agencies (European Medicines Agency and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency). The launch price in UK pounds for a 28-day supply of each medicine at a typical or usual maintenance dose was adjusted for the effects of general inflation using the gross domestic product deflator series. RESULTS: 104 drugs were included in our study with a mean inflation-adjusted 28-day launch price of £288 (SD £678). The launch price of new drugs varied significantly across the five conditions, with drugs for hypertension having the lowest mean price (£27) and drugs for colorectal cancer having the highest mean price (£1590) (p<0.001). There were large increases in launch prices across the study period, but the magnitude and pattern was markedly different between therapeutic areas. Biological drugs represented 13.5% of all included drugs and had a significantly higher launch price than non- biological drugs (£1233 vs £141, p<0.001). 22.1% of included drugs were first-of-kind and had a significantly higher launch price than follow-on drugs (£768 vs £151) (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Drugs prices continue to increase across different therapeutic areas. This has some association with novelty, but, it is not clear if this increase in price is associated with medical benefits.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of reslizumab in the treatment of poorly controlled eosinophilic asthma.

Introduction: Poorly controlled severe eosinophilic asthma is difficult and costly to manage. Reslizumab, an add-on treatment for adults with severe eosinophilic asthma, reduces the number of exacerbations and improves the quality of life (QoL). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of reslizumab. Methods: A Markov model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness of add-on reslizumab with the standard-of-care (SOC) from the US societal perspective over a five-year time horizon. Efficacy and safety inputs for the model were based on data from two clinical trials (NCT01287039 and NCT01285323). Other model inputs, including mortality rates, costs, and utility, were estimated from literature, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). One-way, threshold, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed. Adherence, treatment response, and the placebo effect were evaluated in separate scenario analyses. Results: The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $697 403 (2017 USD) per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). In the PSA, reslizumab becomes cost-effective in 50% of the iterations at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $689 000. The model is most sensitive to the QoL improvement with reslizumab treatment in the one-way and threshold analyses. The response and adherence models had lower ICERs than the base model but still above $500 000. The ICER of the placebo effect model was $29 820. Conclusions: The improvement in QoL and exacerbation rates with reslizumab are associated with high costs, making reslizumab unlikely to be cost-effective at the $200 000 WTP threshold.

[The patients' cost of the montelukast therapy due to the generic substitution]. / A montelukasztterápia betegterheinek változása a generikus árverseny hatására.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: The aim of our study was to analyse the public price of the montelukast sodium therapy in Hungary. METHOD: Data derived from the nationwide pharmaceutical database of the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund Administration. We observed the turnover and price of the medicaments containing the active substance montelukast sodium from 2007 to 2015. Accordingly, our indicators were: consumer price, DCT (daily cost of therapy), co-payment, quasi co-payment, DOT (days of treatment). RESULTS: Due to the increasing DOT, the total amount of the public price paid by the patients increased until 2011, reaching the amount of 1 million USD; then, due to the generic competition and the blind bid methods, it decreased to 490 000 USD. The total amount of the public price of the brand-name Singulair moved to the generics during 3 years (2011-2014). The DCT of the originator Singulair 10 mg tablets decreased from 1.1 USD to 0.34 USD; the DCT of the generic product Montelukast TEVA decreased from 0.67 USD to 0.16 USD in the period under review. CONCLUSION: Due to the generic competition, the patients' access to drugs containing montelukast sodium increased significantly: the DOT increased, the co-payment decreased. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(17): 682-687.

Estimated cost of asthma in outpatient treatment: a real-world study / Estimativa de custo da asma em tratamento ambulatorial: estudo com dados de mundo real

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To estimate the cost of diagnosis and treatment of asthma. METHODS We used the perspective of society. We sequentially included for 12 months, in 2011-2012, 117 individuals over five years of age who were treated for asthma in the Pneumology and Allergy-Immunology Services of the Piquet Carneiro Polyclinic, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. All of them were interviewed twice with a six-month interval for data collection, covering 12 months. The cost units were identified and valued according to defined methods. We carried out a sensitivity analysis and applied statistical methods with a significance level of 5% for cost comparisons between subgroups. RESULTS The study consisted of 108 patients, and 73.8% of them were women. Median age was 49.5 years. Rhinitis was present in 83.3% of the individuals, and more than half were overweight or obese. Mean family income was U$915.90/month (SD = 879.12). Most workers and students had absenteeism related to asthma. Total annual mean cost was U$1,291.20/patient (SD = 1,298.57). The cost related to isolated asthma was U$1,155.43/patient-year (SD = 1,305.58). Obese, severe, and uncontrolled asthmatic patients had higher costs than non-obese, non-severe, and controlled asthmatics, respectively. Severity and control level were independently associated with higher cost (p = 0.001 and 0.000, respectively). The direct cost accounted for 82.3% of the estimated total cost. The cost of medications for asthma accounted for 62.2% of the direct costs of asthma. CONCLUSIONS Asthma medications, environmental control measures, and long-term health leaves had the greatest potential impact on total cost variation. The results are an estimate of the cost of treating asthma at a secondary level in the Brazilian Unified Health System, assuming that the treatment used represents the ideal approach to the disease.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Estimar o custo do diagnóstico e tratamento da asma. MÉTODOS Foi utilizada a perspectiva da sociedade. Foram incluídos por 12 meses em 2011-2012, sequencialmente, 117 indivíduos maiores de cinco anos de idade, em tratamento por asma nos Serviços de Pneumologia e Alergia-Imunologia da Policlínica Piquet Carneiro, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Todos realizaram duas entrevistas com seis meses de intervalo para coleta de dados, cobrindo 12 meses. As unidades de custos foram identificadas e valoradas de acordo com métodos definidos. Foi feita análise de sensibilidade e foram aplicados métodos estatísticos com nível de significância de 5% para comparações de custos entre subgrupos. RESULTADOS Cento e oito pacientes completaram o estudo, 73,8% eram mulheres. Mediana de idade foi de 49,5 anos. Rinite esteve presente em 83,3%, e mais da metade tinha sobrepeso ou obesidade. A renda familiar média foi de R$1.566,19/mês (DP = 1.503,30). A maioria dos trabalhadores e dos estudantes teve absenteísmo relacionado à asma. O custo médio anual total foi de R$2.207,99/paciente (DP = 2.220,55). O custo relacionado à asma isolada foi de R$1.984,17/paciente-ano (DP = 2.232,55). Asmáticos obesos, graves ou não controlados tiveram maiores custos em comparação aos não obesos (p = 0,001), não graves e controlados (p = 0,000). O custo direto correspondeu a 82,3% do custo total estimado. O custo com medicamentos para asma correspondeu a 62,2% dos custos diretos da asma. CONCLUSÕES Medicamentos para asma, medidas de controle ambiental e licenças de saúde prolongadas tiveram maior impacto potencial na variação do custo total. Os resultados são uma estimativa do custo do tratamento da asma em nível secundário no Sistema Único de Saúde, assumindo-se que o tratamento utilizado represente a abordagem ideal da doença.

Measuring the cost of poor asthma control and exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown an association between cost and poor asthma control. However, longitudinal studies of general populations are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost of poor asthma control and exacerbations across a broad spectrum of asthma patients. METHODS: The Observational Study of Asthma Control and Outcomes (OSACO) was a prospective survey of persistent asthma patients in Kaiser Colorado in 2011-2012. Patients received a survey 3 times in one year, which included the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and questions on exacerbations. Self-reported exacerbations were compared to actual oral corticosteroid (OCS) use. Regression analyses examined the association of control (ACQ-5 scores) and exacerbations with healthcare expenditures, controlling for sociodemographics and smoking. Analyses of expenditures used Generalized Linear Models (GLM) with log-link. RESULTS: 2681 individuals completed at least one survey; 1799 completed all three. ACQ-5 scores were associated with higher all-cause and asthma-specific expenditures across all categories of costs (medical, outpatient, ER, pharmacy) except for inpatient expenditures. Each 1-point increase in the ACQ-5 score (i.e., worse control) was associated with a corresponding increase in all-cause annual healthcare and asthma-specific expenditures of $1443 and $927 ($US 2013). Asthma exacerbations with documented OCS use were associated with an increase of $3014 and $1626 over 4 months, while self-reported exacerbations were $713 and $506. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate that poor asthma control and exacerbations are strongly associated with higher healthcare expenditures. Results also confirm that collection of validated measures of control such as the ACQ-5 may provide valuable information toward improving clinical and economic outcomes.

Determinants and impact of suboptimal asthma control in Europe: The INTERNATIONAL CROSS-SECTIONAL AND LONGITUDINAL ASSESSMENT ON ASTHMA CONTROL (LIAISON) study.

BACKGROUND: According to the Global Initiative of Asthma, the aim of asthma treatment is to gain and maintain control. In the INTERNATIONAL CROSS-SECTIONAL AND LONGITUDINAL ASSESSMENT ON ASTHMA CONTROL (LIAISON) study, we evaluated the level of asthma control and quality of life (QoL), as well as their determinants and impact in a population consulting specialist settings. METHODS: LIAISON is a prospective, multicentre, observational study with a cross-sectional and a 12-month longitudinal phase. Adults with an asthma diagnosis since at least 6 months, receiving the same asthma treatment in the 4 weeks before enrolment were included. Asthma control was assessed with the 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and QoL with the MiniAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ). RESULTS: Overall, 8111 asthmatic patients were enrolled in 12 European countries. Asthma control was suboptimal in 56.5 % of patients and it was associated with poorer asthma-related QoL, higher risk of exacerbations and greater consumption of healthcare resources. Variables associated with suboptimal control were age, gender, obesity, smoking and comorbidities. Major determinants of poor asthma control were seasonal worsening and persisting exposure to allergens/irritants/triggers, followed by treatment-related issues. CONCLUSIONS: The cross-sectional phase results confirm that suboptimal control is frequent and has a high individual and economic impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT01567280 .

Establishment of a standard reference material (SRM) herbal DNA barcode library of Vitex negundo L. (lagundi) for quality control measures.

The majority of the population in the Philippines relies on herbal products as their primary source for their healthcare needs. After the recognition of Vitex negundo L. (lagundi) as an important and effective alternative medicine for cough, sore throat, asthma and fever by the Philippine Department of Health (DOH), there was an increase in the production of lagundi-based herbal products in the form of teas, capsules and syrups. The efficiency of these products is greatly reliant on the use of authentic plant material, and to this day no standard protocol has been established to authenticate plant materials. DNA barcoding offers a quick and reliable species authentication tool, but its application to plant material has been less successful due to (1) lack of a standard DNA barcoding loci in plants and (2) poor DNA yield from powderised plant products. This study reports the successful application of DNA barcoding in the authentication of five V. negundo herbal products sold in the Philippines. Also, the first standard reference material (SRM) herbal library for the recognition of authentic V. negundo samples was established using 42 gene accessions of ITS, psbA-trnH and matK barcoding loci. Authentication of the herbal products utilised the SRM following the BLASTn and maximum-likelihood (ML) tree construction criterion. Barcode sequences were retrieved for ITS and psbA-trnH of all products tested and the results of the study revealed that only one out of five herbal products satisfied both BLASTn and ML criterion and was considered to contain authentic V. negundo. The results prompt the urgent need to utilise DNA barcoding in authenticating herbal products available in the Philippine market. Authentication of these products will secure consumer health by preventing the negative effects of adulteration, substitution and contamination.

[The effect of generic price competition on drug consumption and health insurance pharmaceutical expenditures in Hungary]. / A generikus árverseny hatása a gyógyszerforgalomra es a társadalombiztosítási támogatás kiáramláisra Magyarországon.

AIM: The aim of our study was to analyze the Hungarian montelukast sodium drug market. We examined the effect of the appearance of generic drugs on the price and turnover of the brand-name drug, Singulair. DATA AND METHODS: Data derived from the nationwide pharmaceutical database of Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund Administration (2007-2014). We analized the turnover and price of the medicaments containing the active substance montelukast sodium. Accordingly our indicators were: consumer price, social insurance subsidy, patients' co-payment and days of treatment (DOT). RESULTS: First the generics started from a significantly lower price of 18 USD which was lower than the price of brand-name Singulair (32 USD). Then the prices of the generics started to diminish. While in 2007 the DOT was below 2 million, it increased over 10 million days by 2014. The increase of DOT was followed by the increase of health insurance subsidy until 2011. Then the amount of health insurance subsidy decreased from 10,5 million USD to 7 million USD in 2012. In 2013 and 2014 there was a further reduction, the amount of the health insurance subsidy decreased to 4,1 million USD in 2013, and in 2014 it was reduced to 2.2 million USD. CONCLUSIONS: Following the introduction of generic drugs, the price of the medicaments containing montelukast sodium was significantly reduced, while the days on treatment (DOT) increased. The patients' access to drugs containing montelukast sodium increased significantly. The annual health insurance subsidy was significantly reduced as well.

Outcomes before and after treatment escalation to Global Initiative for Asthma steps 4 and 5 in severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about health outcomes in severe asthma reflected by Global Initiative for Asthma steps 4 and 5. OBJECTIVE: To analyze control, risk, economic, and health resource use (HRU) outcomes associated with treatment escalation to Global Initiative for Asthma steps 4 and 5. METHODS: This was a before-vs-after retrospective cohort study of patients (12-75 years old) with asthma newly initiated to omalizumab, high-intensity corticosteroids (HICS; ≥1,000 µg/day of inhaled fluticasone equivalent or oral prednisone), or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid (HDICS; ≥500 to <1,000 µg/day of fluticasone equivalent) using 2002 to 2011 MarketScan data. Poisson regression was used to model HRU outcomes; Tobit regression was used to model medical expenditures. RESULTS: Of 19,227 patients, 856 initiated omalizumab, 6,926 initiated HICS, and 11,445 initiated HDICS. Use of ß-agonist increased for the HDICS and HICS cohorts and decreased for the omalizumab cohort; acute care visits and oral corticosteroid use decreased during follow-up for the HDICS and omalizumab cohorts. Annual health care expenditures, polypharmacy burden, and outpatient visits were high for all cohorts and increased in the follow-up year (baseline to follow-up; general health care expenditures: omalizumab $14,071 to $34,887, HICS $12,030 to $15,557, HDICS $7,570 to $9,826; annual number of asthma prescriptions: omalizumab 11.74 to 19.46, HICS 7.8 to 12.44, HDICS 5.17 to 9.69; outpatient visits: omalizumab 26.79 to 34.06, HICS 18.78 to 21.37, HDICS 15.06 to 16.64). CONCLUSION: Omalizumab use was associated with improvements in risk and control accompanied by large increases in expenditures per HRU. Patients on HDICS and HICS showed improvements in risk but worsening control and increased expenditures per HRU. Innovations in disease management and available treatment options are needed to more optimally achieve treatment goals.

Characterizing the severe asthma population in the United States: claims-based analysis of three treatment cohorts in the year prior to treatment escalation.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the disposition of severe patients prior to treatment escalation. To classify patients by treatment step using pharmacy data and describe their economic and healthcare utilization, insurance status, and sociodemographic characteristics in the year prior to escalation to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) steps 4 and 5. METHODS: This was a retrospective claims cohort study of asthma patients (age 12-75 years) newly initiated on "stable therapy" (three consecutive months of therapy) with omalizumab, high intensity corticosteroids (HICS; ≥1000 µg/d inhaled fluticasone equivalent or oral prednisone), or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid (HDICS; ≥500-<1000 µg/d fluticasone equivalent) from 2002 to 2011. Other asthma treatments were compared as a reference. RESULTS: Of 25,297 patients, 856 initiated omalizumab, 6926 initiated HICS, and 11,445 initiated HDICS. In the year prior to treatment escalation to omalizumab, HICS, and HDICS, respectively, individuals had high annual mean medical expenditures ($14,071, $12,030, and $7570), utilization (27 outpatient and 10 specialty care visits; 19 outpatient and three specialty; 15 outpatient and two specialty), asthma-related prescription drugs (11.74, 7.8, and 5.17) and chronic comorbidities (2.68, 2.67, and 2.19). Prior to omalizumab treatment, patients were more likely to be salaried, full-time employees with commercial PPO/POS insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to escalating treatment to GINA steps 4 and 5, individuals experienced significant annual medical expenditures, healthcare resource utilization and polypharmacy burden, which may reflect poorly controlled asthma and the need to escalate treatment. Medical claims data and utilization-based measures may be helpful in classifying individuals by GINA treatment step.

COST-effectiveness of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (Advair(®)) in uncontrolled asthma in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-utility of the treatment with a long acting beta-agonist (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) combination inhaler [salmeterol xinafoate (SAL)/fluticasone propionate (FP) combination inhaler (SFC) (Advair(®))] to continuing on current ICS dose (no ICS dose change) or increased ICS dose [fluticasone propionate (FP)] in patients with uncontrolled asthma in Canada. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was conducted from a Canadian public healthcare perspective with a one year time horizon. In the no FP dose change scenarios, remaining on daily low (FP 100 ug BID) or medium (FP 200-250 ug BID) or high dose (FP 500 ug BID) was considered. In the increased FP dose scenarios, doubling the FP dose from low to medium dose and from medium to high dose regimens were considered. A decision model was developed with two health states: "symptom free" or "with symptoms". Clinical efficacy was based on a meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials. Over the one year time horizon the percentage with symptom free days (SFD) was used as the measure of differential treatment scenario effectiveness. Drug costs and non-drug costs were incorporated into the analysis. Utilities, derived from EQ5D scores and health services resource use based on patient diaries for 'symptom free' and 'with symptoms' were based on regression analyses of individual patient data from the Gaining Optimal Asthma controL (GOAL) trial. Costs were assessed by assigning unit cost for each health services resource use for each patient. The incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) for SFC vs no FP dose change or increased FP dose were estimated using descriptive statistics. Uncertainty was assessed by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). RESULTS: Over one year, SFC resulted in an incremental cost per patient of $544-$655 compared to no FP dose change and $47-$380 per year compared to increased FP dose. SFC results in incremental QALYs per patient of 0.0100-0.0149 compared to no FP dose change and 0.0136-0.0152 compared to increased FP dose. The one year ICURs were $43,000 to $54,400 per QALY gained for SFC compared to no FP dose change and $25,000 to $3500 per QALY gained compared to increased FP dose scenarios. The probability of SFC being cost-effective at $50,000 per QALY gained was greater than 75% compared to increased FP dose scenarios and compared to no dose change for patients on low or medium dose FP. The results were robust to changes in assumptions within the model. CONCLUSION: In Canadian patients with inadequately controlled asthma on FP, it is cost-effective to use SFC for patients 12 years and over compared to doubling their FP dose. It is also cost-effective to use SFC for patients on low or medium dose FP compared to remaining on the current FP dose in patients with uncontrolled asthma.

[Health care of asthma patients in combination therapy with ICS and LABA - An analysis of statutory health insurance data]. / Versorgung von Asthmapatienten mit Kombinationstherapie aus ICS und LABA - Eine GKV-Daten-Analyse.

The study indicates the patient-centered care of patients with asthma with fixed-dose combination therapy (with three different combinations) regarding the claims-data of several sickness funds. The identified patients were grouped according to their fixed-dose combination, their course of treatment and the number of treatment days with the possibility of two puffs per day. The effects of the corresponding group, their course of treatment and the number of days with two puffs on duration and costs of hospitalisations were evaluated. 47.9 % of the 16 312 insured patients were supplied for only a maximum of 6 out of 24 months with two puffs per day with an ICS/LABA fixed-dose combination. Only 8.3 % received at least two puffs per day for the whole period of investigation. The results may explain the insufficient asthma control found in other studies and serve as basis for further investigations concerning patient centered care. The true reasons for the observed undertreatment remain speculative. The author's recommendations for daily practice are to remain vigilant about activities to measure and manage patient's adherence and their degree of compliance with the medical guidelines.

Comparison of the adherence and persistence to inhaled corticosteroids among adult patients with public and private drug insurance plans.

BACKGROUND: Despite important differences in reimbursement procedures between private and public drug insurance plans in Quebec (Canada), no study has evaluated the impact of the type of drug insurance on the use of essential medications such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The lack of data might be attributable, at least in part, to the absence of a provincial medication database for patients with private drug insurance. OBJECTIVES: To compare patient's adherence and persistence to ICS between Quebec residents (Canada) with private and public drug insurance. METHODS: A matched cohort design with patients selected from the database of the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ) and from reMed, a database that we have put in place for Quebec residents covered by a private drug insurance, was used. ICS users with private drug insurance were selected from reMed between 2008 and 2010 and matched to ICS users with public drug insurance selected from the RAMQ database. Patient's adherence, measured with the proportion of prescribed days covered (PPDC) and persistence over one year, was compared between patients privately and publicly insured using linear regression and Cox regression models. RESULTS: This study included 330 and 1,109 ICS users with private and public drug insurance, respectively. Patients privately insured were significantly less adherent than patients publicly insured (adjusted mean difference of PPDC: -9.7%; 95% CI: -13.2% to -6.5%). Moreover, patients privately insured were found to be 52% more likely to stop ICS during the first year than patients publicly insured (adjusted HR=1.5; 95% CI: 1.2 to 2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Although adherence and persistence were rather low in both groups, patients with public drug insurance appeared to have greater adherence and persistence to ICS than patients with private drug insurance. Differences in reimbursement policies might explain the observed differences.

Integrating asthma education and smoking cessation for parents: financial return on investment.

BACKGROUND: Caregivers who smoke and have children with asthma are an important group for intervention. Home-based interventions successfully reduce asthma morbidity, yet are costly. This study evaluated the financial return on investment (ROI) of the Parents of Asthmatics Quit Smoking (PAQS) program, a combined asthma education and smoking cessation intervention. METHODS: Participants included caregivers (n = 224) that smoked, had a child with asthma, and were enrolled in a Medicaid managed care plan. Participants received nurse-delivered asthma education and smoking counseling in three home visits. Program implementation costs were estimated, and healthcare expenses were obtained from insurance claims data 12 months pre- and 12 months post intervention. ROI was calculated for all participants, children <6 years, children 6-18 years, and children with moderate/severe persistent asthma. RESULTS: Total program implementation cost was $34,481. After intervention, there was increased mean annual refills of beta-agonist (0.51 pre, 1.64 post; P < 0.001), and controller medications (0.65 pre, 2.44 post; P < 0.001). Reductions were found in mean annual emergency department visits (0.33 pre, 0.14 post; P < 0.001), hospitalizations (0.23 pre, 0.08 post; P < 0.001), and outpatient visits (2.33 pre, 1.45 post, P < 0.001). The program had negative ROI (-21.8%) for the entire sample. The ROI was positive (+106.9) for children <6 years, negative (-150.3) for children 6-18, and negligible for moderate/severe persistent asthma (+6.9%). CONCLUSION: PAQS was associated with increased medication use and decreased healthcare utilization. While the overall ROI for PAQS was negative, PAQS had a positive ROI for caregivers of young children with asthma.

[On general practitioners' care of patients with asthma]. / HausärztlicheVersorgung von Patienten mit Asthma.

UNLABELLED: This review offers readers new aspects for the guideline-compliant care of asthma patients. Here, attention is focused on illustrating the bottlenecks in the administration of good and practicable therapeutic care and listing these as "major challenges for GPs". The interdisciplinary team of authors - consisting of three hospital-based pulmonologists, one pulmonologist in private practice, one internist in general practice, one pharmacist and one health economist discussed aspects of asthma therapy relevant in clinical practice. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Practicable results for the reader included an asthma pentagram, a graphic depicting the links and interactions between diagnosis, symptom management, communication, application and costs. From this emerged a consensus on four recommendations that can help GPs improve their care of their patients: (1) Whenever possible, have a specialist verifythe diagnosis. (2) Practice inhalation techniques with the patient and check up on their technique at regular intervals. (3) Monitor and fine-tune the therapeutic goals set down together with the patient. (4) Clearly define the (patient's) responsibilities and who is organizing care (communication between GP-specialist-patient-pharmacist-family members).

[Cost effectiveness of treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone compared to montelukast for the control of persistent asthma in children]. / Costo-efectividad del tratamiento de salmeterol/fluticasona en comparación con leucotrieno montelukast para el control del asma infantil.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of SFC compared with MON for the control of persistent asthma in children. METHODS: We conducted an economic evaluation on a 12-week prospective randomized open-label parallel-group comparison of SFC versus MON in children with symptomatic asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids and short-acting ß2-agonists. Asthma-related medication, unscheduled physician contacts and hospitalizations were collected prospectively. The main effectiveness measure was percentage of asthma-controlled week with no short-acting ß2-agonist use during the study period. The analysis was conducted from the Mexican healthcare perspective using 2010 unit cost prices, and only direct costs were considered, all costs are reported in US dollar. . The model was made fully probabilistic to reflect the joint uncertainty in the model parameters. RESULTS: Over the whole treatment period, the median percentages of asthma-controlled weeks were 83.3% in the SFC group and 66.7% in the MON group (SFC-MON difference, 16.7%; 95% CI, 8.3-16.7; P < 0.001 in favor of SFC). The mean total cost of the SFC regimen was $ 2,323 compared with $ 3,230 for the MON regimen. The SFC was the dominant strategy (both more effective and less expensive) using the SFC was associated with an incremental cost per additional asthma-controlled of $ (5,467). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis tested numerous assumptions about the model cost and efficacy parameters and found that the results were robust to most changes. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that, compared with MON, SFC may be cost saving from the Mexican health care perspective for the treatment of pediatric patients with asthma. SFC provided a reduction in the number of severe exacerbations, frequent asthma symptoms and rescue medication use. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis indicated the dominance of SFC because of both lower costs and greater efficacy.