Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 74
Filtrar
1.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther ; 36(9): 668-671, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32580612

RESUMO

In our University journal club we discussed a large, retrospective study of cataract surgery endophthalmitis rates before and after instituting the use of an intracameral fluoroquinolone antibiotic. We identified several factors involved in the use of off-label, compounded moxifloxacin in intraocular surgery. The introduction of phacoemulsification for cataract surgery led to the potential for smaller incisions. Intraocular lens technology improved to allow for foldable lenses, obviating the requirement to enlarge the incision. This allowed for clear corneal incisions, which unfortunately allow bidirectional passage of liquid. Preservatives were introduced into multi-dose ophthalmic products in the mid 20th century to retard microbial growth. However, more recently, chronic use of benzalkonium chloride has led to concerns about concerns about conjunctival toxicity, especially in patients with ocular surface disease. In the formulation of ocular moxifloxacin, developers were able to develop a "self-preserved", multi-dose product. Other concerns with eyedrops include varying levels of adherence and performance, and the expansion of compounding pharmacies from a named-patient basis to widespread national delivery, with concerns for lower quality. Integrating these factors, use of intracameral moxifloxacin as a prophylactic during cataract and other anterior segment surgery has become a standard of care in much of the U.S. We are concerned that the current position is on a narrow ledge-the standard of care for millions of surgeries each year based upon off-label, compounting use of a single product. We discuss possible ramifications and solutions to this public health issue.


Assuntos
Administração Oftálmica , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Extração de Catarata/métodos , Uso Off-Label , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Catarata/tratamento farmacológico , Extração de Catarata/tendências , Humanos , Assistência Perioperatória/tendências
2.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 26(6): 1301-1305, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31810423

RESUMO

Levofloxacin given at a standard dose of 500 mg daily is recommended for antibacterial prophylaxis in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Obese patients have been shown to exhibit enhanced clearance of levofloxacin and may be at risk for prophylactic failure. This single center, retrospective cohort study from June 2014 to May 2017 evaluated adult patients with estimated creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min receiving their first cycle of a National Comprehensive Cancer Network defined intermediate-risk regimen. Primary endpoint was incidence of febrile neutropenia. Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality and the correlation between estimated levofloxacin area under the concentration-time curve and rates of febrile neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 26 patients: 12 (35.3%) obese and 14 (21.9%) non-obese (P = 0.16). Six (23.1%) of these patients required intensive care, but there were no deaths within 30 days of a febrile neutropenia event. Estimated creatinine clearance was similar between obese and non-obese patients (median 97.5 vs. 91.8 mL/min, P = 0.39), as was estimated levofloxacin area under the concentration-time curve (median 85.6 vs. 90.8 mg×h/L, P = 0.39). There were no significant associations between body weight-related variables - total body weight (median 83.4 vs. 80.6 kg, P = 0.51), body mass index (mean 29.6 vs. 26.8 kg/m2, P = 0.35), or body surface area (1.98 vs. 1.99 m2, P = 0.68) - and febrile neutropenia in this cohort of patients with similar renal function. Obesity should not be a justification for more aggressive levofloxacin dosing schemes when used for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neutropenia Febril/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos de Coortes , Neutropenia Febril/induzido quimicamente , Neutropenia Febril/epidemiologia , Feminino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(1): 75-79, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31679768

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess compliance with antimicrobial spectrum guidelines in the use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) in pediatric surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of children undergoing elective clean-contaminated and clean surgical procedures with foreign body implantation using the Pediatric Health Information System database (10/2015-6/2018) was performed. Compliance rates with consensus guidelines surrounding appropriate spectrum of SAP coverage were calculated for each procedure. Undertreatment was defined as the use of SAP with inappropriately narrow coverage (or omission altogether), while overtreatment was defined as inappropriately broad coverage. RESULTS: Eight procedure groups including a total of 15,708 patients were included. Overall, 44% of cases received inappropriate prophylaxis, of which 58% were considered undertreatment and 42% overtreatment. Procedures with the highest rates of overtreatment included small bowel procedures (77%), colorectal procedures (29%), and hepatobiliary procedures (20%), while the highest rates of undertreatment were associated with placement of tunneled central venous catheters and ports (43%), hepatobiliary procedures (24%), and colorectal procedures (20%). CONCLUSION: Noncompliance with the recommended spectrum of coverage for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is common in pediatric surgery, with both over and undertreatment being common themes. Improved compliance is needed to optimize both antibiotic stewardship and infection prevention. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Criança , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
4.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 20(8): 531-541, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31259858

RESUMO

AIMS: The aim of this survey was to assess the management and organization of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) replacement in Italy. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 24 questions on organizational aspects and on the peri-procedural management of anticoagulant therapies and antibiotic prophylaxis was sent via the Internet to 154 Italian arrhythmia centers. RESULTS: A total of 103 out of 154 centers completed the questionnaire (67% response rate). In 43% of the centers, the procedures were performed under day-case admission, in 40% under ordinary admission, and in 17% under either day-case or ordinary admission. The most frequent reason (66%) for choosing ordinary admission rather than day-case admission was to obtain full reimbursement. Although warfarin therapy was continued in 73% of the centers, nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants were discontinued, without bridging, 24 h or less prior to replacement procedures in 88%. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy was systematically administered in all centers; in 97%, the first antibiotic dose was administered 1-2 h prior to procedures. Local antibacterial envelopes were also used in 43% of the centers in patients with a higher risk of device infection. CONCLUSION: This survey provides a representative picture of how CIED replacements are organized and managed in current Italian clinical practice. The choice of the type of hospitalization (short versus ordinary) was more often motivated by economic reasons (reimbursement of the procedure) than by clinical and organizational factors. Peri-procedural management of anticoagulation and prophylactic antibiotic therapy was consistent with current scientific evidence.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial/tendências , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/tendências , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Cardioversão Elétrica/tendências , Marca-Passo Artificial/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial/economia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/economia , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo/economia , Esquema de Medicação , Cardioversão Elétrica/economia , Cardioversão Elétrica/instrumentação , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Itália , Tempo de Internação , Marca-Passo Artificial/economia , Admissão do Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Falha de Prótese , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Clin Microbiol Rev ; 32(3)2019 06 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31092507

RESUMO

Invasive fungal diseases carry high morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing chemotherapy for hematological malignancies or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In order to prevent these life-threatening infections, antifungal chemoprophylaxis plays an important role in daily clinical practice. Broad-spectrum antifungal triazoles are widely used but exhibit disadvantages such as relevant drug-drug interactions. Therefore, amphotericin B products or echinocandins can be an alternative in selected patient populations. As these compounds are available as intravenous formulations only, there is growing interest in extended dosing regimens. Although not approved for these agents, this strategy is a rational option, as these compounds have properties suitable for this strategy, including dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, prolonged elimination half-life, and a large therapeutic window. As the use of extended dosing regimens in antifungal prophylaxis is expanding in clinical practice, we reviewed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic rationale for this strategy, animal model data, dose escalation studies, and clinical trials supporting this concept.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Antifúngicos/administração & dosagem , Anfotericina B/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/normas , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Equinocandinas/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Micoses/prevenção & controle , Transplantados , Transplante Homólogo
7.
Aesthet Surg J ; 39(6): 615-623, 2019 05 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30052760

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is the most common aesthetic surgery performed in the United States. Despite its popularity, there is no consensus on many aspects of the procedure. OBJECTIVES: The authors assessed current trends and changes in breast augmentation from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 11,756 women who underwent breast augmentation based on the American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) Maintenance of Certification Tracer Database was performed. RESULTS: There were clearly dominant trends in how ABPS-certified plastic surgeons performed breast augmentations. Most surgeries were performed in freestanding outpatient (47.3%) or office operating room (33.7%). The inframammary fold incision was most popular (75.1%), followed by periareolar (17.8%) and transaxillary approaches (4.1%). Implants were more commonly placed in a submuscular pocket (30.6%) compared with dual plane (26.7%) or subglandular (6.7%). Silicone implants (66.8%) were favored over saline (25.1%), with a statistically significant increase in silicone prostheses from 2011 to 2015. Data were "not applicable" or "other" in the remainder of cases. Administration of both preoperative antibiotics (3.8% in 2011, 98.7% in 2015, P < 0.05) and deep venous thromboembolism (DVT) prophylaxis (3.8% in 2011, 90.6% in 2015, P < 0.05) dramatically increased during the study period. Overall adverse events (7.4%) and reoperation rates (2.2%) were low. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in standard of care for breast augmentation are reflected by the evolving practice patterns of plastic surgeons. This is best evidenced by the dramatic increase in use of antibiotic and DVT prophylaxis from 2011 to 2015.


Assuntos
Implante Mamário/tendências , Implantes de Mama/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/tendências , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Implante Mamário/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Dispositivos de Compressão Pneumática Intermitente/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Géis de Silicone , Cloreto de Sódio , Centros Cirúrgicos/tendências , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
8.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30410747

RESUMO

Background: The optimal timing of preoperative surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of changing the timing of SAP on the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in laparoscopic surgery. Methods: We performed a before-after study from August 2014 through June 2017 to assess the impact of changes in the timing of SAP on the incidence of SSI at a 790-bed tertiary care center in Japan. The intervention was the administration of SAP immediately after the study patients entered the operating room for laparoscopic surgery. Results: In total, 1397 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. After the intervention, the median time between the time of SAP completion and the time of surgical incision changed from 8 min to 26 min (p <  0.001), and the number of cases without SAP completion prior to surgical incision decreased (16.8% vs. 1.8%; p <  0.001). However, changes in the overall incidence of SSI did not significantly differ between the pre-intervention and the intervention groups (13.8% vs. 13.2%; p = 0.80). Conclusions: Although the timing of preoperative SAP improved, the intervention did not have a significant impact on reducing the incidence of SSI in the current study. Besides preoperative SAP, multidisciplinary approaches should be incorporated into projects aimed at comprehensively improving surgical quality to reduce SSI.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
S Afr J Surg ; 56(2): 4-6, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30010257

RESUMO

The devastation wrought by bacterial infection in the preantibiotic era is perhaps best exemplified by the First World War. Bacterial infection in soldiers was high because of soil-contaminated shrapnel and shells. As a result, many soldiers lost life and limb. If antibiotics had been available, many may have lived. The pioneering work of Sir Alexander Fleming on the battlefields led to his discovery of penicillin which revolutionised the treatment of bacterial infections and supports so much of modern medicine.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/normas , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Previsões , Humanos , África do Sul , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Organização Mundial da Saúde
10.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 85(3): 444-450, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29985240

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of initial prophylactic antibiotics on facial fractures, outcomes were compared between a short course (≤24 hours) of antibiotics to those who received an extended course (>24 hours). METHODS: Adults admitted (2010-2015) to a Level I trauma center intensive care unit with at least one facial bone fracture and major injuries isolated to the head and neck were included. Our primary analysis compared infectious complications of the head or neck (H/N infection) between patients given short or extended courses of antibiotic prophylaxis. Multivariate logistic regression and analysis of propensity score matched pairs were performed. RESULTS: A total of 403 patients were included, 85.6% had blunt injuries and 72.7% had their facial fracture managed nonoperatively. The H/N infection rate was 11.2%. Two hundred eighty patients received a short course of antibiotics and 123 patients received an extended course. Median Injury Severity Score was 14 in both groups (p = 0.78). Patients receiving an extended course of antibiotics had higher rates of H/N infection (20.3% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.001). Factors associated with development of H/N infection included younger age, penetrating injury, open fracture, upper face or mandible fracture, fractures in multiple facial thirds, vascular injury, hypertension, and extended antibiotic course. Multivariate logistic regression identified younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.00; p = 0.02), multiple facial third fractures (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.4-10.2; p < 0.001), and penetrating mechanism (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.4; p = 0.003) as independent predictors of H/N infection, but not antibiotic duration. Propensity score-matched analysis found no differences in H/N infection between short and extended antibiotic courses (11.4% vs. 12.5%; p = 1.0). Subgroup analyses demonstrated no differences in H/N infection between short or extended antibiotic courses by injury pattern, mechanism, or treatment (operative or nonoperative). CONCLUSION: These results lead us to believe that we should limit antibiotics to 24 hours or less upon admission for facial fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Traumatismos Faciais/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas Expostas/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Estado Terminal/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Faciais/complicações , Traumatismos Faciais/microbiologia , Feminino , Fraturas Expostas/complicações , Fraturas Expostas/patologia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Fraturas Mandibulares/complicações , Fraturas Mandibulares/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas Mandibulares/microbiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/complicações , Fraturas Cranianas/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas Cranianas/microbiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/tratamento farmacológico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/microbiologia
11.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 40(5): 1037-1043, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30054786

RESUMO

Background Audit of antibiotic prophylaxis is an important strategy used to identify areas where stewardship interventions are required. Objectives To evaluate compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetrics and gynaecology surgeries and determine the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) of antibiotic. Settings Three public tertiary hospitals located in Northern Nigeria. Methods This prospective study included women who had obstetrics and gynaecology surgeries with no infection at the time of incision. Appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis was determined by a clinical pharmacist. DDD of antibiotics was determined using ATC/DDD index 2017 from the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Drugs Statistics Methodology. Main outcome measure Compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis and DDD of antibiotic per procedure. Results A total of 248 procedures were included (mean age: 31.7 ± 7.9 years). Nitroimidazole in combination with either beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor or third generation cephalosporin were the most prescribed antibiotics. Redundant anaerobic antibiotic combination was detected in 71.4% of the procedures. Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis was optimal in 16.5% while duration of prophylaxis was prolonged in all the procedures (mean duration was 8.7 ± 1.0 days). The DDD of antibiotics prophylaxis was 16.75 DDD/procedure. Antibiotic utilisation was higher in caesarean section and myomectomy (17.9 DDD/procedure) than hysterectomy (14.5 DDD/procedure); P < 0.001. Redundant metronidazole represents one-third of total DDD and 87% of the DDD for metronidazole. Conclusion Excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis was observed in women who had obstetrics and gynaecology surgeries. These observations underline the need for antimicrobial stewardship interventions to improve antibiotic use.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/tendências , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Obstétricos/tendências , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/tendências , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Obstétricos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos
12.
Pediatr Neurosurg ; 53(1): 18-23, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29073589

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cranial surgical site infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitals. Preoperative hair shaving for cranial neurosurgical procedures is performed traditionally in an attempt to protect patients against complications from infections at cranial surgical sites. However, preoperative shaving of surgical incision sites using traditional surgical blades without properly washing the head after surgery can cause infections at surgical sites. Therefore, a rapid protocol in which the scalp remains unshaven and absorbable sutures are used for scalp closure with early postoperative shampooing is examined in this study. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was conducted from January 2008 to December 2012. A total of 2,641 patients who underwent unshaven cranial surgery with absorbable sutures for scalp closure were enrolled in this study. Data of 1,882 patients who underwent surgery with the traditional protocol from January 2005 to December 2007 were also analyzed for comparison. RESULTS: Of 2,641 patients who underwent cranial surgery with the rapid protocol, all but 2 (0.07%) patients experienced satisfactory wound healing. Of 1,882 patients who underwent cranial surgery with the traditional protocol, 3 patients (0.15%) had infections. Each infection occurred at the superficial incisional surgical site. CONCLUSION: Unshaven cranial surgery using absorbable sutures for scalp closure with early postoperative shampooing is safe and effective in the cranial neurosurgery setting. This protocol has a positive psychological effect. It can help patients accept neurosurgical procedures and improve their self-image after the operation.


Assuntos
Preparações para Cabelo/administração & dosagem , Cabelo , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Técnicas de Sutura , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/tendências , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Crânio/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Sutura/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
13.
Hosp. Aeronáut. Cent ; 13(2): 84-88, 2018. tabl
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1021137

RESUMO

Introducción: La histerectomía es uno de los procedimientos quirúrgicos que con más frecuencia se realiza en Ginecología. La frecuencia de aparición de absceso de cúpula varía desde un 0,7% a un 14%. La infección generalmente es polimicrobiana y los gérmenes implicados son los de la flora vaginal y endocervical de la mujer sana. En el Hospital Aeronáutico Central, desde el año 2007, además de la profilaxis intraoperatoria con cefalosporinas de primera generación, se realiza en las 12 horas previas a la cirugía programada, profilaxis con óvulos vaginales polivalentes. Objetivos: Evaluar la disminución de la incidencia de absceso de cúpula vaginal post cirugía ginecológica, que implique la manipulación de la vagina, con administración pre-quirúrgica de óvulos vaginales polivalentes. Material y Método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo. Se incluyeron 220 pacientes que se les realizaron 220 histerectomías totales: 202 por vía abdominal, 5 laparoscópicas y 13 vaginales. Se realizó profilaxis intraoperatoria con cefalosporinas de 1º generación. Se les administró por vía vaginal un óvulo polivalente compuesto por: metronidazol 300 mg, miconazol nitrato 100 mg, neomicina sulfato 48,8 mg, polimixina b sulfato 4,4 mg, centella asiática 15 mg y excipientes. Se evaluó la aparición de absceso de cúpula vaginal en los 6 meses posteriores a la cirugía. Resultados: Se hallaron complicaciones post quirúrgicas en 10 pacientes (4.5%): 4 pacientes (1,8%) con infección del tracto urinario, 3 pacientes (1,4%) con infección de herida quirúrgica, 1 paciente (0,4%) con fístula vesico-vaginal, 1 paciente con Tromboembolismo pulmonar, 1 paciente con granuloma de cúpula vaginal y 1 paciente con absceso de cúpula vaginal. Esta paciente no recibió el óvulo vaginal polivalente. Conclusión: De los datos obtenidos de las 220 pacientes analizadas, y teniendo en cuenta la bibliografía consultada, podemos concluir que las pacientes que son sometidas a histerectomías totales con técnica de cúpula vaginal cerrada y que reciben como profilaxis preoperatoria un óvulo vaginal polivalente, presentan menor incidencia de complicaciones post operatorias, principalmente a nivel de la cúpula vaginal, y en particular abscesos de cúpula.


Introduction: Hysterectomy is one of the surgical procedures most frecuently performed in gynecology. Vault abscess frequency of appearance varies from 0.7% to 14%. The infection is usually polymicrobial and involved germs are those from vaginal and endocervical flora of the healthy woman. In the Hospital Aeronáutico Central, since 2007, in addition to intraoperative prophylaxis with first-generation cephalosporins, prophylaxis with polyvalent vaginal ovules is performed within 12 hours prior to scheduled surgery. Objectives: Evaluate the decrease in the incidence of vaginal vault abscess after gynecological surgery, involving the manipulation of the vagina, with pre-surgical administration of polyvalent vaginal ovules. Material and Method: Observational, descriptive and retrospective. 220 patients who underwent 220 total hysterectomies were included: 202 abdominal via, 5 laparoscopic and 13 vaginal. Intraoperative prophylaxis was performed with 1st generation cephalosporins. They were administered through vaginal via with Polyvalent ovule composed of: metronidazole 300 mg, miconazole nitrate 100 mg, neomycin sulfate 48.8 mg, polymyxin b sulfate 4.4 mg, gotu kola 15 mg and excipients. The appearance of vaginal dome abscess was evaluated in the 6 months following surgery. Results: Post-surgical complications were found in 10 patients (4.5%): 4 patients (1.8%) with urinary tract infection, 3 patients (1.4%) with surgical wound infection, 1 patient (0.4%) ) with vesico-vaginal fistula, 1 patient with pulmonary thromboembolism, 1 patient with vaginal vault granuloma and 1 patient with abscess of vaginal vault. This patient did not receive the polyvalent vaginal ovum. Conclusion: Data obtained from the 220 patients analyzed, and taking into account the bibliography consulted, we can conclude that patients who undergo total hysterectomies with a closed vaginal vault technique who receive a polyvalent vaginal ovum as a preoperative prophylaxis, present a lower incidence of post-operative complications, mainly at the level of the vaginal vault, and in particular dome abscesses


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Histerectomia Vaginal/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/complicações , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/complicações , Infecções do Sistema Genital/etiologia , Menorragia/complicações
14.
Can J Surg ; 60(6): 388-393, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28930045

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics play an important role in the treatment of many surgical diseases that affect older adults, and the potential for inappropriate use of these drugs is high. Our objective was to describe antibiotic use among older adults admitted to an acute care surgery service at a tertiary care teaching hospital. METHODS: Detailed data regarding diagnosis, comorbidities, surgery and antibiotic use were retrospectively collected for patients 70 years and older admitted to an acute care surgery service. We evaluated antibiotic use (perioperative prophylaxis and treatment) for appropriateness based on published guidelines. RESULTS: During the study period 453 patients were admitted to the acute care surgery service, and 229 underwent surgery. The most common diagnoses were small bowel obstruction (27.2%) and acute cholecystitis (11.0%). In total 251 nonelective abdominal operations were performed, and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was appropriate in 49.5% of cases. The most common prophylaxis errors were incorrect timing (15.5%) and incorrect dose (12.4%). Overall 206 patients received treatment with antibiotics for their underlying disease process, and 44.2% received appropriate first-line drug therapy. The most common therapeutic errors were administration of second- or third-line antibiotics without indication (37.9%) and use of antibiotics when not indicated (12.1%). There was considerable variation in the duration of treatment for patients with the same diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate antibiotic use was common among older patients admitted to an acute care surgery service. Quality improvement initiatives are needed to ensure patients receive optimal care in this complex hospital environment.


CONTEXTE: Les antibiotiques jouent un rôle important dans de nombreux cas de chirurgie chez les adultes âgés, et le risque d'utilisation inappropriée de ces médicaments est élevé. Notre objectif était de décrire l'utilisation des antibiotiques chez les patients âgés admis au service chirurgical d'urgence d'un centre hospitalier universitaire de soins tertiaires. MÉTHODES: Nous avons recueilli de manière rétrospective les données détaillées sur le diagnostic, les comorbidités, la chirurgie et l'utilisation d'antibiotiques chez les patients de 70 ans et plus admis dans un service chirurgical d'urgence. Nous avons évalué le bien-fondé du recours aux antibiotiques (prophylaxie et traitement périopératoire) en fonction des lignes directrices publiées. RÉSULTATS: Durant la période de l'étude, 453 patients ont été admis au service chirurgical d'urgence et 229 ont subi une chirurgie. Les diagnostics les plus fréquents étaient : occlusion de l'intestin grêle (27,2 %) et cholécystite aigüe (11,0 %). En tout, 251 interventions abdominales urgentes ont été effectuées et l'antibioprophylaxie périopératoire était justifiée dans 49,5 % des cas. Les erreurs les plus fréquentes en matière de prophylaxie ont été : moment mal choisi (15,5 %) et dose incorrecte (12,4 %). En tout, 206 patients ont reçu une antibiothérapie pour un processus pathologique sous-jacent et 44,2 % ont reçu un traitement antibiotique de première intention approprié. Les erreurs thérapeutiques les plus fréquentes concernaient l'administration d'antibiotiques de deuxième ou de troisième intention sans indication (37,9 %) et l'utilisation d'antibiotiques lorsque cela n'était pas indiqué (12,1 %). On a noté une variation considérable de la durée des traitements chez des patients porteurs de diagnostics semblables. CONCLUSION: L'utilisation inappropriée des antibiotiques a été fréquente chez les patients adultes admis dans un service chirurgical d'urgence. Des initiatives s'imposent sur le plan de l'amélioration de la qualité pour s'assurer ainsi que les patients reçoivent des soins optimaux dans cet environnement hospitalier complexe.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cuidados Críticos , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar
15.
J Urol ; 196(4): 1244-9, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27157368

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Concerns about antibiotic resistance, adverse drug reactions and questionable medical benefits have led to changes in prophylactic antibiotic management in hypospadias repair at our clinic. In March 2010 our guidelines were changed from continuous prophylaxis for 14 days to 1 dose preoperatively and another at removal of the stent. We analyze the effects of this new regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective journal cohort study of all our hypospadias operations from June 2008 to December 2011. We collected data from consecutive patients undergoing primary tubularized incised plate repair and postoperative stent. Patients operated on before March 2010 were compared to those operated on later. End points were postoperative infection requiring antibiotics and any complication that required redo surgery. RESULTS: The study included 113 primary tubularized incised plate repairs with postoperative stents. Patient distribution was the same in both groups. Of 58 patients in the group receiving continuous antibiotic prophylaxis 17 had a complication and/or infection, compared to 9 of 55 patients receiving 2-dose prophylaxis. The infection rate was 5% in the continuous prophylaxis group and 4% in the 2-dose group. In contrast to our expectations, a lower complication rate was observed in the group with lower antibiotic dose without an increased risk of infection. CONCLUSIONS: There is little documented evidence concerning benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis for postoperative complications, which gives rise to large variations in clinical practice. In our study lower antibiotic dose did not increase the number of infections, but rather decreased complication rates. We advocate antibiotic prophylaxis with only a 2-dose regimen.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Hipospadia/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Uretra/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos , Pré-Escolar , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Suécia/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
J Laryngol Otol ; 129(1): 63-7, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25592303

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of chemoradiotherapy protocols, total laryngectomy carries increasing risks such as pharyngocutaneous fistula. There is little reference to the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in salvage surgery. This study aimed to determine the current practice in antibiotic prophylaxis for total laryngectomy in the UK. METHOD: A questionnaire was designed using SurveyMonkey software, and distributed to all ENT-UK registered head and neck surgeons. RESULTS: The survey revealed that 19 surgeons (51 per cent) follow a protocol for antibiotic prophylaxis in primary total laryngectomy and 17 (46 per cent) follow a protocol in salvage total laryngectomy. Only 11 (30 per cent) use anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents in their antibiotic prophylaxis. The duration of prophylaxis varies considerably. Nineteen surgeons (51 per cent) revealed that their choice of antibiotic prophylaxis reflected non-evidence-based practices. CONCLUSION: There appears to be little evidence-based guidance on antibiotic prophylaxis in primary and salvage total laryngectomy. The survey highlights the need for more research in order to inform national guidance on antibiotic prophylaxis in primary and salvage total laryngectomy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Fístula/prevenção & controle , Laringectomia/efeitos adversos , Otolaringologia/tendências , Doenças Faríngeas/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Antibioticoprofilaxia/normas , Protocolos Clínicos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Fístula/etiologia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Laringectomia/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Faríngeas/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Terapia de Salvação/efeitos adversos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
17.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 152(1): 63-6, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25305267

RESUMO

This study describes the patterns of perioperative antimicrobial use by otolaryngologists during common otolaryngologic surgical procedures. Through the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Infectious Diseases Committee, a survey was developed to assess the current practice patterns regarding the use of perioperative antibiotics in otolaryngology. A total of 6903 surveys were sent out; 458 were fully or partially completed, and a total of 442 responses were included in the final analysis. Most physicians reported routinely prescribing antibiotics either preoperatively or postoperatively for 12 of the 17 procedures included in the questionnaire despite providers agreeing that there is not enough evidence to support their use. The most common procedure for which antibiotics were prescribed was laryngectomy (91.1%). Antibiotic use is a common practice during the perioperative period for otolaryngologic procedures; however, there is a discrepancy between utilization and evidence of benefit.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Otolaringologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários
19.
Cancer ; 120(13): 1985-92, 2014 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24677028

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intensive chemotherapy for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia incurs the risk of infectious complications, but the benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis remain unclear. METHODS: In the current study, among 103 children treated on the AML02 protocol between October 2002 and October 2008 at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, the authors retrospectively assessed the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on the frequency of febrile neutropenia, clinically or microbiologically confirmed infections (including bacteremia), and antibiotic resistance, as well as on the results of nasal and rectal surveillance cultures. Initially, patients received no prophylaxis or oral cephalosporin (group A). The protocol was then amended to administer intravenous cefepime alone or intravenous vancomycin plus either oral cephalosporin, oral ciprofloxacin, or intravenous cefepime (group B). RESULTS: There were 334 infectious episodes. Patients in group A had a significantly greater frequency of documented infections and bacteremia (both P < .0001) (including gram-positive and gram-negative bacteremia; P = .0003 and .001, respectively) compared with patients in group B, especially viridans streptococcal bacteremia (P = .001). The incidence of febrile neutropenia without documented infection was not found to be different between the 2 groups. Five cases of bacteremia with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) occurred in group B (vs none in group A), without related mortality. Two of these cases were preceded by positive VRE rectal surveillance cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is feasible in children with acute myeloid leukemia and reduces the frequency of documented infection but not of febrile neutropenia. Despite the emergence of VRE bacteremia, the benefits favor antibiotic prophylaxis. Creative approaches to shorten the duration of prophylaxis and thereby minimize resistance should be explored.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Neutropenia Febril Induzida por Quimioterapia/prevenção & controle , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Candidíase/diagnóstico , Cefepima , Cefalosporinas/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ciprofloxacina/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia de Consolidação/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Quimioterapia de Indução/efeitos adversos , Lactente , Infusões Intravenosas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patologia , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nariz/microbiologia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos , Reto/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem
20.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 95(7): 495-502, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24112496

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial prophylaxis remains the most powerful tool used to reduce infection rates in orthopaedics but the choice of antibiotic is complex. The aim of this study was to examine trends in antimicrobial prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery involving the insertion of metalwork between 2005 and 2011. METHODS: Two questionnaires (one in 2008 and one in 2011) were sent to all National Health Service trusts in the UK using the Freedom of Information Act. RESULTS: In total, 87% of trusts that perform orthopaedic surgery responded. The use of cefuroxime more than halved between 2005 and 2011 from 80% to 36% and 78% to 26% in elective surgery and trauma surgery respectively. Combination therapy with flucloxacillin and gentamicin rose from 1% to 32% in elective and 1% to 34% in trauma surgery. Other increasingly popular regimes include teicoplanin and gentamicin (1% to 10% in elective, 1% to 6% in trauma) and co-amoxiclav (3% to 8% in elective, 4% to 14% in trauma). The majority of changes occurred between 2008 and 2010. Over half (56%) of the trusts stated that Clostridium difficile was the main reason for changing regimes. CONCLUSIONS: In 2008 a systematic review involving 11,343 participants failed to show a difference in surgical site infections when comparing different antimicrobial prophylaxis regimes in orthopaedic surgery. Concerns over C difficile and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus have influenced antimicrobial regimes in both trauma and elective surgery. Teicoplanin would be an appropriate choice for antimicrobial prophylaxis in both trauma and elective units but this is not reflected in its current level of popularity.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/tendências , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Osso e Ossos/lesões , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/prevenção & controle , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Substituição de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Substituição de Medicamentos/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/tendências , Humanos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA