Exploring Cardiovascular Autonomic Function before and after Chronic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure control in Parkinson's disease (PD) under subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is influenced by several intertwined aspects, including autonomic failure and levodopa treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of chronic STN-DBS, levodopa, and their combination on cardiovascular autonomic functions in PD. METHODS: We performed cardiovascular reflex tests (CRTs) before and 6-months after STN-DBS surgery in 20 PD patients (pre-DBS vs. post-DBS). CRTs were executed without and with medication (med-OFF vs. med-ON). RESULTS: CRT results and occurrence of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (OH) did not differ between pre- and post-DBS studies in med-OFF condition. After levodopa intake, the BP decrease during HUTT was significantly greater compared to med-OFF, both at pre-DBS and post-DBS evaluation. Levodopa-induced OH was documented in 25% and 5% of patients in pre-DBS/med-ON and post-DBS/med-ON study. CONCLUSION: Chronic stimulation did not influence cardiovascular responses, while levodopa exerts a relevant hypotensive effect. The proportion of patients presenting levodopa-induced OH decreases after STN-DBS surgery.

Trial of Lixisenatide in Early Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Lixisenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist used for the treatment of diabetes, has shown neuroprotective properties in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease. METHODS: In this phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the effect of lixisenatide on the progression of motor disability in persons with Parkinson's disease. Participants in whom Parkinson's disease was diagnosed less than 3 years earlier, who were receiving a stable dose of medications to treat symptoms, and who did not have motor complications were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to daily subcutaneous lixisenatide or placebo for 12 months, followed by a 2-month washout period. The primary end point was the change from baseline in scores on the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III (range, 0 to 132, with higher scores indicating greater motor disability), which was assessed in patients in the on-medication state at 12 months. Secondary end points included other MDS-UPDRS subscores at 6, 12, and 14 months and doses of levodopa equivalent. RESULTS: A total of 156 persons were enrolled, with 78 assigned to each group. MDS-UPDRS part III scores at baseline were approximately 15 in both groups. At 12 months, scores on the MDS-UPDRS part III had changed by -0.04 points (indicating improvement) in the lixisenatide group and 3.04 points (indicating worsening disability) in the placebo group (difference, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 5.30; P = 0.007). At 14 months, after a 2-month washout period, the mean MDS-UPDRS motor scores in the off-medication state were 17.7 (95% CI, 15.7 to 19.7) with lixisenatide and 20.6 (95% CI, 18.5 to 22.8) with placebo. Other results relative to the secondary end points did not differ substantially between the groups. Nausea occurred in 46% of participants receiving lixisenatide, and vomiting occurred in 13%. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with early Parkinson's disease, lixisenatide therapy resulted in less progression of motor disability than placebo at 12 months in a phase 2 trial but was associated with gastrointestinal side effects. Longer and larger trials are needed to determine the effects and safety of lixisenatide in persons with Parkinson's disease. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health and others; LIXIPARK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03439943.).

Therapeutic Effect and Side Effects of Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Parkinson Disease and Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series Studies.

PURPOSE: The co-existence of Parkinson disease (PD) and myasthenia gravis (MG) in an individual should be exceptionally rare. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the current literature regarding the therapeutic effect and side effects of pharmacotherapy on patients with PD and MG. METHODS: Five bioscience and engineering databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched from inception through February 21, 2022. Case reports and case series studies investigating pharmacotherapy in patients with PD and MG were included. Procedures were followed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The methodologic quality of included studies was evaluated by using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies. FINDINGS: Sixteen case reports and 5 case series studies with 32 participants met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies were rated as good quality, 10 were fair quality, and 3 were poor quality. The side effects of pharmacotherapy for PD or MG led to another disease, indicating an imbalance between dopamine and acetylcholine within human bodies. IMPLICATIONS: When treating a patient who has PD or MG, health providers should be cautious about the occurrence of another disease. Timely treatment must rely on monitoring new symptoms as soon as the pharmacotherapy for PD or MG is initiated. Physical therapy may be helpful in decreasing the side effects of pharmacotherapy in patients with PD and MG. A new treatment pattern of pharmacotherapy + physical therapy for patients with PD and MG warrants further research. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews identifier: CRD42022308066.

Safety review of current pharmacotherapies for levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Levodopa remains the gold standard for treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients develop complications with disease progression, necessitating adjunctive therapy to control fluctuations in motor and non-motor symptoms and dyskinesia. Knowledge of medication safety and tolerability is critical to ascertain the benefit-risk ratio and select an adjunctive therapy that provides the highest chance for medication adherence. Posing a challenge are the sheer abundance of options, stemming from the development of several new drugs in recent years, as well as differences in commercial drug availability worldwide. AREAS COVERED: This review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of current US FDA-approved pharmacotherapies for levodopa-treated PD patients, including dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist amantadine, and the adenosine receptor antagonist istradefylline. Data were taken from pivotal phase III randomized controlled and post-surveillance studies, when available, that directly led to FDA-approval. EXPERT OPINION: No strong evidence exists to support use of a specific adjunctive treatment for improving Off time. Only one medication has demonstrated improvement in dyskinesia in levodopa-treated PD patients; however, every patient cannot tolerate it and therefore adjunctive therapy should be tailored to an individual's symptoms and risk for specific adverse effects.

Drugs to the Rescue: Comparison of On-Demand Therapies for OFF Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease.

Patients with Parkinson's disease often suffer from OFF symptoms disrupting their daily routines and adding to disabilities. Despite polypharmacy and adjustments to medication schedules, they often do not experience consistent relief from their motor symptoms. As the disease progresses, impaired gastric emptying may evolve, making it even more challenging for dopaminergic drugs to provide consistent results. This review focuses on a group of drugs that have the pharmacokinetic advantage of a much earlier onset of action by virtue of their non-oral routes of absorption. We compare the current marketed options: subcutaneous apomorphine, sublingual apomorphine, and inhaled levodopa. Subcutaneous apomorphine is the speediest to take effect, whereas sublingual apomorphine offers the longest clinical effect. Inhaled levodopa has the most favorable side effect profile among the three options. An inhaled form of apomorphine is currently under development, having passed safety and efficacy studies. Each of these drugs has unique characteristics for the user, including different side effect profiles and onset of action. The best choice for a patient will depend on individual needs and circumstances. In this review, we explore those nuances to allow clinicians to select the best option for their patients.

The adenosine A2A receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, KW-6356 enhances the anti-parkinsonian activity of L-DOPA with a low risk of dyskinesia in MPTP-treated common marmosets.

The adenosine A2A receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, KW-6356 has been shown to be effective in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients as monotherapy and as an adjunct therapy to L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)/decarboxylase inhibitor. However, the effects of KW-6356 combined with L-DOPA on anti-parkinsonian activity and established dyskinesia has not been investigated in preclinical experiments. We examined the effects of combination of KW-6356 with L-DOPA in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated common marmosets. Oral administration of KW-6356 (1 mg/kg) enhanced the anti-parkinsonian activities of various doses of L-DOPA (2.5-10 mg/kg). In MPTP-treated common marmosets primed with L-DOPA to show dyskinesia, KW-6356 (1 mg/kg) also enhanced the anti-parkinsonian activities of various doses of L-DOPA (1.25-10 mg/kg) but not dyskinesia. Chronic co-administration of KW-6356 (1 mg/kg) with a low dose of L-DOPA (2.5 mg/kg) for 21 days increased the degree of dyskinesia induced by the low dose of L-DOPA, but the amplitude of dyskinesia induced by combined administration of KW-6356 (1 mg/kg) with L-DOPA (2.5 mg/kg) was lower than that induced by an optimal dose of L-DOPA (10 mg/kg). These results suggest that KW-6356 can be used to potentiate the effects of a wide range of L-DOPA doses with a low risk of dyskinesia for the treatment of PD.

Serotonin 5-HT1A receptors and their interactions with adenosine A2A receptors in Parkinson's disease and dyskinesia.

The dopamine neuronal loss that characterizes Parkinson's Disease (PD) is associated to changes in neurotransmitters, such as serotonin and adenosine, which contribute to the symptomatology of PD and to the onset of dyskinetic movements associated to levodopa treatment. The present review describes the role played by serotonin 5-HT1A receptors and the adenosine A2A receptors on dyskinetic movements induced by chronic levodopa in PD. The focus is on preclinical and clinical results showing the interaction between serotonin 5-HT1A receptors and other receptors such as 5-HT1B receptors and adenosine A2A receptors. 5-HT1A/1B receptor agonists and A2A receptor antagonists, administered in combination, contrast dyskinetic movements induced by chronic levodopa without impairing motor behaviour, suggesting that this drug combination might be a useful therapeutic approach for counteracting the PD motor deficits and dyskinesia associated with chronic levodopa treatment. This article is part of the Special Issue on "The receptor-receptor interaction as a new target for therapy".

Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease: Pathogenesis and Emerging Treatment Strategies.

The most commonly used treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) is levodopa, prescribed in conjunction with carbidopa. Virtually all patients with PD undergo dopamine replacement therapy using levodopa during the course of the disease's progression. However, despite the fact that levodopa is the "gold standard" in PD treatments and has the ability to significantly alleviate PD symptoms, it comes with side effects in advanced PD. Levodopa replacement therapy remains the current clinical treatment of choice for Parkinson's patients, but approximately 80% of the treated PD patients develop levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) in the advanced stages of the disease. A better understanding of the pathological mechanisms of LID and possible means of improvement would significantly improve the outcome of PD patients, reduce the complexity of medication use, and lower adverse effects, thus, improving the quality of life of patients and prolonging their life cycle. This review assesses the recent advancements in understanding the underlying mechanisms of LID and the therapeutic management options available after the emergence of LID in patients. We summarized the pathogenesis and the new treatments for LID-related PD and concluded that targeting pathways other than the dopaminergic pathway to treat LID has become a new possibility, and, currently, amantadine, drugs targeting 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors, and surgery for PD can target the Parkinson's symptoms caused by LID.

A Pilot Study Exploring the Association of Entacapone, Gut Microbiota, and the Subsequent Side Effects in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

Background and Aims: Entacapone, one of the most common drugs distributed among patients with Parkinson's disease, is a peripherally acting catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor that is used in addition to levodopa to control symptoms. However, there have been negative effects reported against entacapone, namely, gastrointestinal (GI) problems and drowsiness. In this pilot study, we aim to examine the hypothesis that the discomfort induced by entacapone might be originated from the shift of microbial composition by adjusting the effect of levodopa. Methods: The population in this pilot study consisted of 13 PD patients treated with levodopa only and 11 with both levodopa and entacapone. The 16S rRNA gene sequence data were processed, aligned, and categorized using the DADA2. Alpha diversity indices for Observed, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson metrics were calculated with Phyloseq 1.32.0. Dissimilarities were calculated using unweighted unique fraction metrics (Unifrac), weighted Unifrac, and Canberra distance. Functional differences were calculated by PICRUSt2 based on the KEGG database. Results: Results of 16S rRNA sequencing analysis showed that while entacapone did not influence the species richness, the composition of the microbial community shifted considerably. Relative abundances of bacteria related to constipation and other GI disorders also altered significantly. Functional enrichment analysis revealed changes in the metabolic activity of alanine, aspartate, and glutamate. These amino acids are related to common side effects of entacapone such as auditory hallucinations, fatigue, and nightmare. Conclusion: Our findings provide testable hypothesis on the cause of unpleasant side effects of entacapone, which in the long run could possibly be reduced through gut microbiota manipulation.

Non-dopaminergic approaches to the treatment of motor complications in Parkinson's disease.

Dopamine replacement therapy with l-DOPA is the most efficacious symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease, but its utility is limited by a development of motor fluctuations and abnormal involuntary movements (dyskinesia) in the majority of patients. These complications are attributed to the combined effects of dopaminergic degeneration and non-physiological reinstatement of dopamine transmission by the standard oral medications. There is substantial evidence that this altered state of dopamine transmission causes pathophysiological changes to a variety of non-dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems in the brain. This evidence has prompted an interest in developing drugs that target non-dopaminergic receptors for the purpose of improving l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia and/or motor fluctuations. We here review all the most important categories of non-dopaminergic targets that have been investigated so far, but with a particular focus on modulators of glutamatergic and serotonergic transmission, which continue to inspire significant efforts towards clinical translation. In particular, we discuss both the experimental rationale and the clinical experience thus far gained from studying 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor agonists, NMDA and AMPA receptor antagonists, mGluR5 negative allosteric modulators, mGluR4 positive allosteric modulators, and adenosine A2a receptor antagonists. We also review compounds with complex pharmacological properties that are already used clinically or about to enter an advanced phase of clinical development (amantadine, safinamide, zonisamide, pridopidine, mesdopetam). We conclude with an outlook on possible directions to address unmet needs and improve the chance of successful translation in this therapeutic area.

Antiparkinsonian activity of Tabebuia impetiginosa bark and biochemical analysis of dopamine in rat brain homogenates.

OBJECTIVES: Improving economy and well-being in developing nations like India has expanded life expectancy and changed the attention from transmittable to non transmittable diseases such as Parkinson's disease. Tabebuia impetiginosa has been utilized by cultivators as a general tonic, immunostimulant, adaptogen and also in motor disorders. The present investigation was to explore the antiparkinsonian activity of Tabebuia impetiginosa bark by experimental methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Control group-I was served with distilled water. Group-II was considered as pathological control [1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) 2mg/nostrils i.n, Reserpine 40mg/kg s.c, Haloperidol 0.5mg/kg, i.p]. Group-III served with standard drug (Apomorphine 40mg/kg, s.c). Group IV and V received aqueous extract of Tabebuia impetiginosa bark in doses of 300 and 500mg/kg/day respectively. Tremor, hypokinesia, muscular rigidity, catatonia, postural immobility, postural instability and catalepsy were assessed for antiparkinsonian activity. RESULTS: The bark extract served group exhibited the increased levels of dopamine (5700±1.84ng/g) when compared to control groups (4300±3.17ng/g). The extract at both the doses displayed a significant reduction in postural flexion, moderate decrease in tremor, muscular rigidity and postural immobility scores but do not exhibit significant lowering of hypokinesia score in reserpine induced Parkinsonian model. The reduction in catatonia and catalepsy scores is more remarkable in case of high dose of extract (500mg/kg) compared to standard drug in Neuroleptic induced Parkinsonism. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate that Tabebuia impetiginosa bark extract has significant anti-cataleptic potentials and the antioxidant effect of the bark may also be a significant contributor to its antiparkinsonian activity.

The risk of melanoma with rasagiline compared with other antiparkinsonian medications: A retrospective cohort study in the United States medicare database.

PURPOSE: Compare the risk of melanoma between initiators of rasagiline or other antiparkinsonian drugs (APDs) in a Parkinson's disease (PD) population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the US Medicare claims research database (2006-2015) in adults aged ≥65 years with PD claims. Other APD initiators were randomly matched (4:1) to rasagiline initiators on age, sex, and cohort entry year. Cutaneous melanoma events were identified by a validated claims algorithm. Incidence rates (IRs), incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and Cox-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for melanoma comparing rasagiline with other APD initiators were calculated and analyzed by duration of study medication use and cumulative dose of rasagiline. Potential indicators of surveillance bias were explored. RESULTS: Among 23 708 rasagiline initiators and 96 552 matched APD initiators, the crude IR of melanoma/100 000 person-years was 334.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 291.5-381.6) and 208.2 (95% CI, 190.1-227.5), respectively (crude IRR 1.61; 95% CI, 1.36-1.89). The adjusted HR was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.14-1.65) and increased with longer rasagiline exposure and higher cumulative rasagiline doses. Rasagiline initiators more frequently had dermatologist visits or skin biopsies before cohort entry than APD initiators and had a higher incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer during follow-up (crude IRR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.35-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: A small increased incidence of melanoma with exposure to rasagiline compared with other APDs was observed. Although the pattern with dose and duration is consistent with a hypothesized biologic effect, the increased skin cancer surveillance among rasagiline users suggests surveillance bias as a contributing explanation for the observed results.

Efficacy and safety of istradefylline for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

As an adenosine receptor A2A antagonist, istradefylline is used as an adjunctive agent of levodopa to improve motor symptoms in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. In this study, we re-evaluated the effects of istradefylline on treating the motor symptoms of PD patients. We performed a literature search up to November 2021 from electronic databases. Eligible studies were synthesized for efficacy, tolerability, OFF time, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III score, ON state with dyskinesia, and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. As a result, nine clinical studies with 2727 subjects on istradefylline treatment for PD patients were included. Our results showed that compared to placebo, istradefylline exhibited a statically significant difference in efficacy (1.39 [1.15 to 1.69]; p = 0.001), decreasing OFF time (-0.58 [-1.01 to - 0.16]; p = 0.007), and improving ON state with dyskinesia (0.69 [0.02 to 1.37]; p = 0.043). For tolerability, UPDRS III, and adverse effects, there was no significant difference between istradefylline and placebo. In conclusion, the results suggest that istradefylline exhibits an efficient and well-tolerated role in treating PD patients. Randomized controlled trials and long-term studies are still required to investigate the effects of istradefylline on motor and non-motor symptoms of PD in future research.

Efficacy and safety of istradefylline in patients with Parkinson's disease presenting with postural abnormalities: Results from a multicenter, prospective, and open-label exploratory study in Japan.

Postural abnormalities in Parkinson's disease (PD) can devastatingly impair the quality of life, especially in patients with advanced disease, and are generally refractory to dopaminergic agents. The objective of this exploratory study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of istradefylline for the treatment of postural abnormalities in PD. In this open-label, 24-week, single-arm prospective trial, PD patients with postural abnormalities experiencing the wearing-off phenomenon on levodopa-containing therapies were enrolled and received a starting dose of 20 mg/day istradefylline orally for 4 weeks, which was then increased to 40 mg/day. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to week 24 in the 14-item Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) total score. Pivotal secondary endpoints were changes in the sub-items of UDRS, Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Overall, 24/31 enrolled patients completed the study; mean (standard deviation) age and duration of motor complications were 73.3 (7.7) years and 3.2 (4.4) years, respectively. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change in the UDRS total score was 4.84 (1.97, 7.71; P = 0.002), with significant improvements in the neck, right distal arm and hand, and trunk severity scores. Mean (95% CI) change in the MDS-UPDRS part III score was 7.84 (4.34, 11.34; P < 0.001). The most common ADRs were malaise, dyskinesia exacerbation, and visual hallucinations in 2 (6.5%) patients each. This exploratory study demonstrated that istradefylline could be efficacious for postural abnormalities and was generally well tolerated in patients with PD experiencing the wearing-off phenomenon with levodopa-containing therapies.

Spontaneous Graft-Induced Dyskinesias Are Independent of 5-HT Neurons and Levodopa Priming in a Model of Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: The risk of graft-induced dyskinesias (GIDs) presents a major challenge in progressing cell transplantation as a therapy for Parkinson's disease. Current theories implicate the presence of grafted serotonin neurons, hotspots of dopamine release, neuroinflammation and established levodopa-induced dyskinesia. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the mechanisms of GIDs. METHODS: Neonatally desensitized, dopamine denervated rats received intrastriatal grafts of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) differentiated into either ventral midbrain dopaminergic progenitor (vmDA) (n = 15) or ventral forebrain cells (n = 14). RESULTS: Of the eight rats with surviving grafts, two vmDA rats developed chronic spontaneous GIDs, which were observed at 30 weeks post-transplantation. GIDs were inhibited by D2 -like receptor antagonists and not affected by 5-HT1A/1B/5-HT6 agonists/antagonists. Grafts in GID rats showed more microglial activation and lacked serotonin neurons. CONCLUSIONS: These findings argue against current thinking that rats do not develop spontaneous GID and that serotonin neurons are causative, rather indicating that GID can be induced in rats by hESC-derived dopamine grafts and, critically, can occur independently of both previous levodopa exposure and grafted serotonin neurons. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Orthostatic Hypotension and Antiparkinsonian Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is multifactorial in Parkinson's disease (PD). Antiparkinsonian medication can contribute to OH, leading to increased risk of falls, weakness and fatigue. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antiparkinsonian drugs associated with OH as an adverse effect, compared to placebo. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases until November 2020. Analysis used fixed-effects models and the GRADE tool to rate quality of evidence. Meta-analysis was performed if 3 or more studies of a drug group were available. RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs including 3783 patients were included comparing 6 PD drug groups to placebo (MAO-B inhibitors, dopamine agonists, levodopa, COMT inhibitors, levodopa and adenosine receptor antagonists). OH was recorded as an adverse event or measurement of vital signs, without further specification on how this was defined or operationalised. Meta-analysis was performed for MAO-B inhibitors and dopamine agonists, as there were 3 or more studies for these drug groups. In this analysis, compared with placebo, neither MAO-B inhibitors or dopamine agonists were associated with increased risk of OH, (OR 2.28 [95% CI:0.81-6.46]), (OR 1.39 [95% CI:0.97-1.98]). CONCLUSIONS: Most studies did not specifically report OH, or reporting of OH was limited, including how and when it was measured. Furthermore, studies specifically reporting OH included participants that were younger than typical PD populations without multimorbidity. Future trials should address this, for example,, by including individuals over the age of 75, to improve estimations of how antiparkinsonian medications affect risk of OH.

Efficacy of Istradefylline, an Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonist, as Adjunctive Therapy to Levodopa in Parkinson's Disease: A Pooled Analysis of 8 Phase 2b/3 Trials.

BACKGROUND: Istradefylline is a selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist for the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing OFF episodes while on levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitor. OBJECTIVE: This pooled analysis of eight randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2b/3 studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of istradefylline. METHODS: Istradefylline was evaluated in PD patients receiving levodopa with carbidopa/benserazide and experiencing motor fluctuations. Eight 12- or 16-week trials were conducted (n = 3,245); four of these studies were the basis for istradefylline's FDA approval. Change in OFF time as assessed in patient-completed 24-h PD diaries at Week 12 was the primary endpoint. All studies were designed with common methodology, thereby permitting pooling of data. Pooled analysis results from once-daily oral istradefylline (20 and 40 mg/day) and placebo were evaluated using a mixed-model repeated-measures approach including study as a factor. RESULTS: Among 2,719 patients (placebo, n = 992; 20 mg/day, n = 848; 40 mg/day, n = 879), OFF hours/day were reduced at Week 12 at istradefylline dosages of 20 mg/day (least-squares mean difference [LSMD] from placebo in reduction from baseline [95%CI], -0.38 h [-0.61, -0.15]) and 40 mg/day (-0.45 h [-0.68, -0.22], p < 0.0001); ON time without troublesome dyskinesia (ON-WoTD) significantly increased. Similar results were found in the four-study pool (OFF hours/day, 20 mg/day, -0.75 h [-1.10, -0.40]; 40 mg/day, -0.82 h [-1.17, -0.47]). Istradefylline was generally well-tolerated; the average study completion rate among istradefylline-treated patients across all studies was 89.2%. Dyskinesia was the most frequent adverse event (placebo, 9.6%; 20 mg/day, 16.1%; 40 mg/day, 17.7%). CONCLUSION: In this pooled analysis, istradefylline significantly improved OFF time and ON-WoTD relative to placebo and was well-tolerated.

Emerging Pharmacotherapies for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second commonest neurodegenerative disorder in the older adult and is characterized by progressive disabling motor symptoms of bradykinesia, tremor, rigidity, postural instability and also non motor symptoms that affect quality of life. The pharmacotherapy of PD consists of oral, transdermal, and subcutaneous medications, as well as invasive advanced therapies at later stages of the disease. PD medications are often started as monotherapy but with the progression of the illness often there is a need to add more medications and frequently comprises of a challenging polypharmacotherapy. Adverse effects of pharmacotherapy often add to the problems of adequate treatment. Patients and physicians have to prioritize treatment goals on the most disabling symptoms and the safest and most effective treatments. Almost every year newer medications and modes of delivery continue to be researched and added to the therapeutic armamentarium. This review article outlines existing and emerging pharmacotherapies for motor symptoms in PD.

Surgical treatment of buried bumper syndrome in patients with Parkinson´s disease and duodenal levodopa/carbidopa infusion therapy.

We read with interest the article by Garrido Durán C, et al. in which endoscopic aspects of duodenal levodopa/carbidopa therapy in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease were analyzed. In this article, buried bumper syndrome (BBS) is documented in 5.4 % of cases. Normally, the initial treatment of BBS is endoscopic therapy, although sometimes surgery may be necessary. Thus, 4 cases of BBS treated with surgery are presented.