Modern Image Acquisition System Reduces Radiation Exposure to Patients and Staff During Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Radiation damage during complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is of major concern to patients and medical staff. This study investigates primarily the influence of different acquisition systems (Allura ClarityIQ vs. Allura Xper, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) on radiation dose. Secondly, radiation exposure was analysed for operator positions as well as for procedure and patient specific parameters. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. The study prospectively included 62 consecutive patients (mean age 71.2 ± 8.4 years; 63% males) who underwent complex EVAR including fenestrated or branched EVAR of the thoraco-abdominal or the aortic arch from 30 June 2015 to 20 May 2016. In half the patients an advanced dose and real time image noise reduction technology (Allura ClarityIQ) was used, and in the other half the reference acquisition system (Allura Xper) was used. Patient demographics included age, gender, and body mass index. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with mean age of 71.2 ± 8.4 years (63% males; 39/62) were treated using either Allura ClarityIQ or Allura Xper. Patients treated using Allura ClarityIQ had lower cumulative dose area product (18,948.3 ± 14,648.5 cGy cm2vs. 38,512.4 ± 24,105.4 cGy cm2, p < 0.001) and air kerma (2237.9 ± 1808 mGy vs. 4031 ± 3260.2 mGy, p = .010) in comparison with patients treated using Allura Xper. CONCLUSION: Advanced dose and real time image noise reduction technology, such as Allura ClarityIQ, is a useful tool to lower the amount of radiation for patient and staff during complex endovascular aortic procedures.

Use of carbon dioxide for therapeutic decision-making in endoleaks: a case report / Uso de CO2 na tomada de decisão terapêutica de endoleak: relato de caso

Abstract Endovascular aneurysm repair is currently the most frequently treatment modality for infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Endoleaks are the most common cause of reintervention after endovascular aneurysm repair. It is often unclear which type of endoleak is the correct diagnose, making the treatment decision difficult. We report the case of a 72-year-old man with an endoleak two years after endovascular aneurysm repair. Images suggested a type III endoleak, but this was not confirmed by contrast aortography. We proceeded with the investigation using aortography with carbon dioxide and observed a type IA endoleak. This was successfully treated by implantation of a proximal cuff. A review of the literature shows that the role of carbon dioxide in endoleak management is still unclear. We present a case in which carbon dioxide was essential to both diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making in a type IA endoleak.

Resumo O tratamento endovascular dos aneurismas de aorta abdominal é atualmente a modalidade de tratamento mais comum. Os endoleaks representam a causa mais frequente de reintervenção após o tratamento endovascular. O diagnóstico do tipo de endoleak frequentemente é incerto, tornando o tratamento desafiador. Apresentamos o caso de um paciente de 72 anos, com endoleak após 2 anos de tratamento endovascular de aneurisma de aorta abdominal. Os exames de imagem pré-operatórios sugeriam um endoleak tipo III; entretanto, durante aortografia com contraste iodado, não foi possível identificá-lo. Optamos por realizar aortografia com dióxido de carbono (CO2), sendo, então, identificado um endoleak tipo IA, que foi tratado com sucesso com o uso de uma extensão (cuff) proximal. O papel do CO2 no diagnóstico de endoleaks ainda não está claro. Relatamos um caso em que o uso do CO2 foi essencial para o diagnóstico e para a decisão de tratamento do endoleak tipo IA.

Fusion Imaging for EVAR with Mobile C-arm.

BACKGROUND: Fusion imaging is a technique that facilitates endovascular navigation but is only available in hybrid rooms. The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of fusion imaging with a mobile C-arm in a conventional operating room through the use of an angionavigation station. METHODS: From May 2016 to June 2017, the study included all patients who underwent an aortic stent graft procedure in a conventional operating room with a mobile flat-panel detector (Cios Alpha, Siemens) connected to an angionavigation station (EndoNaut, Therenva). The intention was to perform preoperative 3D computerized tomography/perioperative 2D fluoroscopy fusion imaging using an automatic registration process. Registration was considered successful when the software was able to correctly overlay preoperative 3D vascular structures onto the fluoroscopy image. For EVAR, contrast dose, operation time, and fluoroscopy time (FT) were compared with those of a control group drawn from the department's database who underwent a procedure with a C-arm image intensifier. RESULTS: The study included 54 patients, and the procedures performed were 49 EVAR, 2 TEVAR, 2 IBD, and 1 FEVAR. Of the 178 registrations that were initialized, it was possible to use the fusion imaging in 170 cases, that is, a 95.5% success rate. In the EVAR comparison, there were no difference with the control group (n = 103) for FT (21.9 ± 12 vs. 19.5 ± 13 min; P = 0.27), but less contrast agent was used in the group undergoing a procedure with the angionavigation station (42.3 ± 22 mL vs. 81.2 ± 48 mL; P < 0.001), and operation time was shorter (114 ± 44 vs. 140.8 ± 38 min; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Fusion imaging is feasible with a mobile C-arm in a conventional operating room and thus represents an alternative to hybrid rooms. Its clinical benefits should be evaluated in a randomized series, but our study already suggests that EVAR procedures might be facilitated with an angionavigation system.

Optimizing imaging and reducing radiation exposure during complex aortic endovascular procedures.

Improvements in endovascular technologies and development of custom-made fenestrated and branched endografts currently allow clinicians to treat complex aortic lesions such as thoraco-abdominal and aortic arch aneurysms once treatable with open repair only. These advances are leading to an increase in the complexity of endovascular procedures which can cause long operation times and high levels of radiation exposure. This in turn places pressure on the vascular surgery community to display more superior interventional skills and radiological practices. Advanced imaging technology in this context represents a strong pillar in the treatment toolbox for delivering the best care at the lowest risk level. Delivering the best patient care while managing the radiation and iodine contrast media risks, especially in frail and renal impaired populations, is the challenge aortic surgeons are facing. Modern hybrid rooms are equipped with a wide range of new imaging applications such as fusion imaging and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). If these technologies contribute to reducing radiation, they can be complex and intimidating to master. The aim of this review is to discuss the fundamentals of good radiological practices and to describe the various imaging tools available to the aortic surgeon, both those available today and those we anticipate will be available in the near future, from equipment to software, to perform safe and efficient complex endovascular procedures.

Radiation doses for endovascular aortic repairs performed on mobile and fixed C-arm fluoroscopes and procedure phase-specific radiation distribution.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze radiation risk to patients during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using mobile C-arm (MA) or fixed C-arm (FA) fluoroscopes and to describe the dose distribution during the different phases of the procedure. METHODS: Patients treated with EVAR using a single stent graft system between November 2009 and June 2016 were included in this study. The patients were divided into one of two groups (MA or FA) according to the type of C-arm used in the procedure. Data regarding patients' demographics and the total amount of contrast agent (CA) used, dose-area product, and fluoroscopy time for the procedures were prospectively recorded. Based on the dose report from the FA system, five standard and two optional phases of the procedure were identified to determine the dose distribution. RESULTS: Overall, 160 patients were included (mean age, 73.30 ± 8.97 years; 146 men); of these, 107 were treated with an MA system and 53 were treated with an FA system. The mean amounts of CA used were 108.55 ± 42.28 mL in the MA group and 85.37 ± 38.79 mL in the FA group (P = .0014). The mean total dose-area product values were 49.93 ± 38.06 Gy·cm2 in the MA group and 168.34 ± 146.92 Gy·cm2 in the FA group (P < .0001). There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time between the groups. Per-phase analysis demonstrated that identification of the proximal landing zone and main body deployment required the most radiation, accounting for 24% of the total radiation dose. Overall, 47.6% of the exposure was due to digital subtraction angiography. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an FA system can significantly reduce the amount of CA needed but may also lead to higher radiation doses in EVAR procedures. Dose monitoring remains crucial for the safety of both patients and operators. A detailed analysis of dose distribution is possible with modern systems, which may improve the quality of monitoring in the future.

Use of Synchrotron Radiation to Accurately Assess Cross-Sectional Area Reduction of the Aortic Branch Ostia Caused by Suprarenal Stent Wires.

PURPOSE: To compare in vivo the use of synchrotron radiation to computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the measurement of cross-sectional area (CSA) reduction of the aortic branch ostia caused by suprarenal stent-graft wires. METHODS: This study was performed with a Zenith stent-graft placed in a phantom of the human aorta to simulate treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Synchrotron radiation scans were performed using beam energies between 40 and 100 keV and spatial resolution of 19.88 µm per pixel. CSA reduction of the aortic branch ostia by suprarenal stent wires was calculated based on these exposure factors and compared with measurements from CTA images acquired on a 64-row scanner with slice thicknesses of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm. RESULTS: Images acquired with synchrotron radiation showed <10% of the CSA occupied by stent wires when a single wire crossed a renal artery ostium and <20% for 2 wires crossing a renovisceral branch ostium. The corresponding areas ranged from 24% to 25% for a single wire and from 40% to 48% for double wires crossing the branch ostia when measured on CT images. The stent wire was accurately assessed on synchrotron radiation with a diameter between 0.38±0.01 and 0.53±0.03 mm, which is close to the actual size of 0.47±0.01 mm. The wire diameter measured on CT images was greatly overestimated (1.15±0.01 to 1.57±0.02 mm). CONCLUSION: CTA has inferior spatial resolution that hinders accurate assessment of CSA reduction. This experiment demonstrated the superiority of synchrotron radiation over CTA for more accurate assessment of aortic stent wires and CSA reduction of the aortic branch ostia.

Endovascular Repair of a Short Neck Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with a Physician-Modified Vascutek Anaconda Stent Graft.

An 81-year-old woman was referred for the treatment of a 79-mm-diameter short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm with highly tortuous iliac arteries. She was considered at high risk for open repair and not suitable for standard endovascular repair given the short length of the proximal neck. Delay for a manufactured custom-made fenestrated stent graft was too long given the diameter of the aneurysm. A flexible stent graft was preferred because of severe iliac tortuosity. Endovascular repair was performed using a physician-modified Anaconda stent graft with 1 fenestration for the left renal artery. The technique for device modification and implantation is described. Postoperative course was uneventful and 1-year computed tomography scan showed complete exclusion of the aneurysm sac and patent left renal artery.

Influential Factors on the Evaluation of Adamkiewicz Artery Using a 320-Detector Row Computed Tomography Device.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the difference of Adamkiewicz artery (AKA) presentation in healthy and diseased subjects, and the influence of atherosclerotic factors prevalent in aortic disease patients, are important for aortic disease therapeutic planning. This study used a 320-detector row computed tomography (CT) device to examine the impact of clinical aspects of AKA identification in individuals with and without aortic disease. METHODS: Angio-CTs obtained from 115 patients were assessed and the individuals grouped according to the presence or absence of aortic disease. Datasets were analyzed using OsiriX software, and AKA was identified by three-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction. RESULTS: The group without aortic disease (Group A) comprised 32 (52.5%) men and 29 women, with a mean age of 53.7 ± 16.8 years. The group with aortic disease (Group B) comprised 31 (57.4%) men and 23 women, with a mean age of 64.8 ± 11.6 years. AKA was identified in 49 (80.3%) participants of Group A and 23 (42.6%) individuals of Group B (P ≤ 0.0001). In 53 cases (73.6%), AKA originated on the left side. AKA was mainly detected on the left side (73.6%), at the level of T10 to T12 (70%). Tobacco smokers, former smokers, and hypertensive patients had increased odds of having undetected AKA. CONCLUSIONS: Using the method described and a state of the art 320-detector row CT device, AKA was detected more frequently among individuals without aortic disease. Thus, aortic disease and atherosclerotic risk factors hindered AKA detection.

The use of intraosseous needles for injection of contrast media for computed tomographic angiography of the thoracic aorta.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and quality of computed tomographic angiography of the thoracic aorta (CTA-TA) exams performed using intraosseous needle intravenous access (ION-IVA) for contrast media injection (CMI). METHODS: All CTA-TA exams at the study institution performed between 1/1/2013 and 8/14/2015 were reviewed retrospectively to identify those exams which had been performed using ION-IVA (ION-exams). ION-exams were then analyzed to determine aortic attenuation and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Linear regression was used to determine how injection rate and other variables affected image quality for ION-exams. Patient electronic medical records were reviewed to identify any adverse events related to CTA-TA or ION-IVA. RESULTS: 17 (∼0.2%) of 7401 exams were ION-exams. ION-exam CMI rates varied between 2.5 and 4 ml/s. Mean attenuation was 312 HU (SD 88 HU) and mean CNR was 25 (SD 9.9). A strong positive linear association between attenuation and injection rate was found. No immediate or delayed complications related to the ION-exams, or intraosseous needle use in general, occurred. CONCLUSION: For CTA-TA, ION-IVA appears to be a safe and effective route for CMI at rates up to 4 ml/s.

What should we expect from the hybrid room?

The concept of hybrid room was defined as an optimized surgical theater, offering the best compromise between asepsis criteria from standard surgical rooms and high quality imaging equipment from fixed radiological suites. This review aimed at summarizing what vascular surgeons should expect from hybrid rooms in daily practice and in the near future.

Comparison of Radiation Exposure Associated With Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Follow-up Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography for Evaluating Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs.

PURPOSE: To compare the radiation exposure associated with intraoperative contrast-enhanced cone-beam computed tomography (ceCBCT) acquisitions to standard 3-phase multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography used for assessing technical success after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). METHODS: Effective doses (EDs) were calculated for 66 EVAR patients (mean age 71 years; 61 men) with a mean 27.7-kg/m(2) body mass index (range 17-49) who had both intraoperative ceCBCT and postoperative 3-phase MDCT angiography between November 2012 and April 2015. In addition, EDs were directly determined using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) embedded in anthropomorphic phantoms with body mass indexes of 22 and 30 kg/m(2) Effective doses were calculated by summing doses recorded by all TLDs corresponding to a specific tissue type before applying the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 60 and 103 weighting factors. EDs were compared with each other for both imaging modalities as well as to TLD measurements. RESULTS: Average EDs of the patient collective were 4.9±1.1 mSv for ceCBCT, 2.6±1.2 mSv for single-phase MDCT (46% decrease, covering solely the area of the implanted endograft), and 13.6±5.5 mSv for comprehensive 3-phase MDCT examinations (178% increase, anatomical coverage from the aortic arch to femoral artery bifurcation). EDs determined in phantom measurements ranged from 3.1 to 4.5 mSv for ceCBCT, amounting to 2.6 mSv for a single MDCT phase (15% to 40% decrease) using ICRP 60 conversion factors. Applying ICRP 103 factors resulted in higher values for ceCBCT and slightly lower ones for MDCT. CONCLUSION: ceCBCT offers the chance for immediate intraoperative revisions of endograft-related problems. Requiring only a single-phase acquisition, ceCBCT is associated with a considerable reduction in ED (50%-75%) compared to standard 3-phase MDCT angiography after EVAR. On the other hand, MDCT has a larger field of view and is associated with less radiation exposure for a single phase (reduction of 20%-60%) if only the stented region is covered; however, MDCT angiography also uses larger amounts of contrast.

AlluraClarity Radiation Dose-Reduction Technology in the Hybrid Operating Room During Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of radiation dose reduction with the Allura ClarityIQ image processing technology for fixed C-arms in comparison with a mobile C-arm and an Allura fixed C-arm without ClarityIQ technology during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures. METHODS: Radiation dose data from 85 patients (mean age 74.2±7.8 years; 68 men) undergoing EVAR with mobile and fixed C-arm fluoroscopy were retrospectively analyzed. The radiation dose parameters included the kerma area product (KAP), fluoroscopic time (FT), and number of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) frames (FrDSA). KAPtotal consisted of KAPfluoro (KAP for fluoroscopic imaging) and KAPDSA (KAP for DSA and single shots). Linear regression analysis was used to explore differences in the association of KAP with the FT, FrDSA, and body mass index (BMI) among the 3 C-arms. RESULTS: The mean KAPtotal values for mobile, Allura C-arm, and AlluraClarity C-arm for noncomplex EVARs were 56±39, 245±142, and 157±120 Gy·cm(2) (p<0.001); for complex EVARs, the values were 110±43, 874±653, and 598±319 Gy·cm(2) (p<0.001), respectively. On average, KAPfluoro tripled when the mobile C-arm was replaced by the fixed C-arm. There were no significant differences in the KAPfluoro adjusted for the FT between Allura and AlluraClarity (p=0.69). However, there was a major 61% reduction in KAPDSA from 1.36 Gy·cm(2) per DSA frame for Allura to 0.54 Gy·cm(2) per DSA frame with AlluraClarity (p=0.03). For the mobile C-arm, BMI was not associated with KAP (p=0.13). The associations of BMI with KAPfluoro and KAPDSA were significant for both fixed C-arms but were more robust for Allura compared to AlluraClarity (p=0.02 for KAPfluoro and p<0.001 for KAPDSA). CONCLUSION: Changing a mobile C-arm for a fixed C-arm in a hybrid operating suite increased the average intraoperative dose during EVAR. Upgrading the Allura fixed C-arm with ClarityIQ technology resulted in a 61% reduction in the radiation per DSA frame.

CT angiography of the aorta using 80 kVp in combination with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction and automated tube current modulation: Effects on image quality and radiation dose.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate image quality and radiation dose of a CT angiography (CTA) protocol using 80 kVp in combination with iterative reconstruction and automated tube current modulation. METHODS: Ninety-five aortic CTA examinations were included in this study. A novel 80 kVp aortic CTA-protocol with iterative reconstruction was introduced in our department in March 2012 for patients with a body mass index (BMI) below 32 kg/m(2). The first 72 consecutive examinations were retrospectively assigned to group A (56 patients, 42 men, 14 women, mean age 69.6 ± 10.7 years, BMI range 19.7-31.1 kg/m(2)). For comparison, the last 23 consecutive examinations performed with the old protocol (100 kVp) were assigned to group B (21 patients, 13 men, 8 women, mean age 67.4 ± 11.1 years, BMI range 19.7-31.9 kg/m(2)). Thoracic and abdominal contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and aortic attenuation were assessed. Subjective image quality was rated on a 5-point scale (1 = non diagnostic; 5 = excellent). Furthermore, dose length product (DLP) and volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) were analysed. RESULTS: All examinations achieved diagnostic image quality. Attenuation of the aorta was significantly higher in group A compared with B (thoracic: 443.5 ± 90.5 Hounsfield units (HU) vs. 296.0 ± 61.0 HU; abdominal: 426.3 ± 94.2 HU vs. 283.6 ± 60.5 HU; P < 0.05, respectively). CNR, SNR and subjective image quality were comparable between both groups (CNR: 12.8 ± 3.7 vs. 13.0 ± 7.4; SNR 14.4 ± 3.9 vs. 14.9 ± 8.2; subjective image quality: 4.3 ± 0.6 vs. 4.5 ± 0.6; P > 0.05, respectively). CTDIvol and DLP were significantly lower in group A (1.9 ± 0.5 mGy; 139.2 ± 41.1 mGy × cm) as compared with group B (4.2 ± 1.4 mGy; 292.1 ± 91.5 mGy × cm; P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Low-dose CTA of the aorta using 80 kVp with iterative reconstruction enables a significant dose reduction of up to 50% compared with a 100 kVp protocol in patients with a BMI below 32 kg/m(2) while diagnostic image quality is maintained.

Comparative occupational radiation exposure between fixed and mobile imaging systems.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular intervention exposes surgical staff to scattered radiation, which varies according to procedure and imaging equipment. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in occupational exposure between procedures performed with fixed imaging (FI) in an endovascular suite compared with conventional mobile imaging (MI) in a standard operating room. METHODS: A series of 116 endovascular cases were performed over a 4-month interval in a dedicated endovascular suite with FI and conventional operating room with MI. All cases were performed at a single institution and radiation dose was recorded using real-time dosimetry badges from Unfors RaySafe (Hopkinton, Mass). A dosimeter was mounted in each room to establish a radiation baseline. Staff dose was recorded using individual badges worn on the torso lead. Total mean air kerma (Kar; mGy, patient dose) and mean case dose (mSv, scattered radiation) were compared between rooms and across all staff positions for cases of varying complexity. Statistical analyses for all continuous variables were performed using t test and analysis of variance where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 43 cases with MI and 73 cases with FI were performed by four vascular surgeons. Total mean Kar, and case dose were significantly higher with FI compared with MI. (mean ± standard error of the mean, 523 ± 49 mGy vs 98 ± 19 mGy; P < .00001; 0.77 ± 0.03 mSv vs 0.16 ± 0.08 mSv, P < .00001). Exposure for the primary surgeon and assistant was significantly higher with FI compared with MI. Mean exposure for all cases using either imaging modality, was significantly higher for the primary surgeon and assistant than for support staff (ie, nurse, radiology technologist) beyond 6 feet from the X-ray source, indicated according to one-way analysis of variance (MI: P < .00001; FI: P < .00001). Support staff exposure was negligible and did not differ between FI and MI. Room dose stratified according to case complexity (Kar) showed statistically significantly higher scattered radiation in FI vs MI across all quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: The scattered radiation is several-fold higher with FI than MI across all levels of case complexity. Radiation exposure decreases with distance from the radiation source, and is negligible outside of a 6-foot radius. Modern endovascular suites allow high-fidelity imaging, yet additional strategies to minimize exposure and occupational risk are needed.

Automated Tube Voltage Selection for Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Angiography Using Different Contrast Media Concentrations and a Constant Iodine Delivery Rate.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate radiation dose reduction using automated tube voltage selection during CT angiography (CTA) and to evaluate the impact of contrast medium (CM) injection protocols on dose reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A circulation phantom containing the thoracic and abdominal vasculature was used. Four different concentrations of CM (iopromide 300 and 370 mg I/mL and iomeprol 350 and 400 mg I/mL) were administered while maintaining an identical iodine delivery rate (1.8 g I/s) and total iodine load (20.0 g). Three different scanning protocols for CTA of the thoracoabdominal aorta were used: protocol A, no dose modulation; protocol B, automated tube current modulation (CARE Dose4D); and protocol C, automated tube voltage selection (CARE kV). The dose-length product was recorded to calculate the effective dose. Attenuation values (in Hounsfield units), image noise levels, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in six predefined intravascular sites (three thoracic and three abdominal) were measured by two readers. All values were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the effective dose (in millisieverts) for protocols B (mean ± SD, 2.03 ± 0.1 mSv) and C (1.00 ± 0.0 mSv) compared with protocol A (4.34 ± 0.0 mSv). The dose was reduced by 53% for protocol B and by 77% for protocol C. No significant differences were found in the effective dose among the different CM injection protocols within the scanning protocols; all p values were > 0.05. The attenuation values and SNRs were comparable among all the different CM injection protocols; all p values were > 0.05. CONCLUSION: A large radiation dose reduction (77%) can be achieved using automated tube voltage selection independent of the CM injection protocol.

[An Experimental Set-Up for Navigated-Contrast-Agent and Radiation Sparing Endovascular Aortic Repair (Nav-CARS EVAR)]. / Ein Prototyp für die navigierte Implantation von Aortenstentprothesen zur Reduzierung der Kontrastmittel- und Strahlenbelastung: Das Nav-CARS-EVAR-Konzept (Navigated-Contrast-Agent and Radiation Sparing Endovascular Aortic Repair).

INTRODUCTION: Over the last decade endovascular stenting of aortic aneurysm (EVAR) has been developed from single centre experiences to a standard procedure. With increasing clinical expertise and medical technology advances treatment of even complex aneurysms are feasible by endovascular methods. One integral part for the success of this minimally invasive procedure is innovative and improved vascular imaging to generate exact measurements and correct placement of stent prosthesis. One of the greatest difficulty in learning and performing this endovascular therapy is the fact that the three-dimensional vascular tree has to be overlaid with the two-dimensional angiographic scene by the vascular surgeon. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We report the development of real-time navigation software, which allows a three-dimensional endoluminal view of the vascular system during an EVAR procedure in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysm. We used the preoperative planning CT angiography for three-dimensional reconstruction of aortic anatomy by volume-rendered segmentation. At the beginning of the intervention the relevant landmarks are matched in real-time with the two-dimensional angiographic scene. During the intervention the software continously registers the position of the guide-wire or the stent. An additional 3D-screen shows the generated endoluminal view during the whole intervention in real-time. RESULTS: We examined the combination of hardware and software components including complex image registration and fibre optic sensor technology (fibre-bragg navigation) with integration in stent graft introducer sheaths using patient-specific vascular phantoms in an experimental setting. From a technical point of view the feasibility of fibre-Bragg navigation has been proven in our experimental setting with patient-based vascular models. Three-dimensional preoperative planning including registration and simulation of virtual angioscopy in real time are realised. CONCLUSION: The aim of the Nav-CARS-EVAR concept is reduction of contrast medium and radiation dose by a three-dimensional navigation during the EVAR procedure. To implement fibre-Bragg navigation further experimental studies are necessary to verify accuracy before clinical application.

Significant Radiation Dose Reduction in the Hybrid Operating Room Using a Novel X-ray Imaging Technology.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: To prospectively quantify radiation dose change in aortoiliac endovascular procedures in the hybrid operating room (OR) for patients and medical staff with a novel X-ray imaging technology (ClarityIQ technology), and to assess whether procedure or fluoroscopy time or dose of iodinated contrast was affected. METHODS: A prospective study including 138 patients was performed to compare radiation dose before and after installation of a novel X-ray imaging technology. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was performed in 37 patients and an endovascular procedure for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) in 101. Patient radiation dose in air kerma (AK) and dose area product (DAP), patient demographics, and procedural data were recorded. Staff radiation dose was measured with real time personal dosimetry measurements. In both the EVAR and AIOD groups the reference system, ALX (AlluraXper FD20; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands), was compared with the upgraded X-ray system, CIQ (AlluraClarity FD20; Philips Healthcare). Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and iodinated contrast dose were recorded. RESULTS: Patient radiation dose reduction in the EVAR group, in median AK, was 56% (ALX = 1,262.5 mGy; CIQ = 556.0 mGy [p < .01]); and in median DAP it was 57% (ALX = 224.4 Gycm(2) and CIQ = 95.8 Gycm(2) [p < .01]). Patient radiation dose reduction in the AIOD group, in median AK, was 76% (ALX = 1,011.0 mGy; CIQ = 248.0 mGy [p < .01]); and in median DAP it was 73% (ALX = 138.1 Gycm(2); CIQ = 38.0 Gycm(2) [p < .01]). Staff dose reduction in the EVAR group was 16% (ALX = 70.1 µSv; CIQ = 59.2 µSv [p = .43]) and in the AIOD group it was 69% (ALX = 96.2 µSv; CIQ = 30.1 µSv [p < .01]). There was no statistically significant difference between patient demographics, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and iodinated contrast medium use in the two treatment groups before and after installation. CONCLUSION: A novel X-ray imaging technology in the hybrid OR suite resulted in a significant reduction of patient and staff radiation dose without affecting procedure length, fluoroscopy time, or use of contrast.

Dynamic volumetric CT angiography for the detection and classification of endoleaks: application of cine imaging using a 320-row CT scanner with 16-cm detectors.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and diagnostic performance of dynamic volumetric computed tomography (CT) angiography with large-area detectors in the detection and classification of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Low-dose dynamic volumetric CT angiography performed with the patient in Fowler position was used to scan the entire stent graft with a 16-cm-area detector during the first follow-up examination after EVAR. There were 39 consecutive patients (36 men and 3 women; mean age, 74 y ± 8.7) examined with approximately 14-20 intermittent scans (temporal resolution, 2 s; scan range, 160 mm). The effective radiation dose, image quality, interobserver and intraobserver agreement for endoleak detection, and time delay between peak enhancement of the aorta and endoleaks were evaluated. RESULTS: All examinations with the patient in Fowler position enabled the entire stent graft to be scanned and were rated as diagnostic. The mean effective radiation dose was 13.1 mSv. Endoleaks were detected in eight patients (type Ia, n = 1; type II, n = 6; type III, n = 1). Interobserver agreement (κ = 0.794) and intraobserver agreement (κ = 1.00) for detection of endoleaks were excellent. The mean time delay between peak enhancement of the aorta and the endoleaks was significantly less for type I/III endoleaks (2.0 s ± 0) compared with type II endoleaks (5.3 s ± 1.0; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose dynamic volumetric CT angiography performed with the patient in Fowler position is feasible after EVAR. Dynamic information, including cine imaging, the timing of peak enhancement, and the Hounsfield units index, is useful in detecting and classifying endoleaks.

Experimental foundation for in vivo measurement of the elasticity of the aorta in computed tomography angiography.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine the feasibility of measuring the elastic properties of the arterial wall in vivo. To prove this concept, elastic parameters were calculated from an aortic model of elastic behavior similar to a human aorta using computed tomography angiography (CTA) images. METHODS: We first constructed an aortic model from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). This model was inserted into a pulsatile flow loop. The model was then placed inside a computed tomography scanner. To estimate the elasticity values, we measured the cross-sectional area and the pressure changes in the model during each phase of the simulated cardiac cycle. A discrete wavelet transform (DWT) algorithm was applied to the CTA data to calculate the geometric changes in the pulsatile model over a simulated cardiac cycle for various pulsatile rates and elasticity values of the PDMS material. The elastic modulus of the aortic model wall was derived from these geometric changes. The elastic moduli derived from the CTA data were compared with those obtained by testing strips of the same PDMS material in a tensile testing machine. Our two aortic models had elastic values at both extremes of those found in normal human aortas. RESULTS: The results show a good comparison between the elastic values derived from the CTA data and those obtained in a tensile testing machine. In addition, the elasticity values were found to be independent of the pulsatile rate for mixing ratios of 6:1 and 9:1 (p = .12 and p = .22, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The elastic modulus of a pulsatile aortic model may be measured by electrocardiographically-gated multi-detector CTA protocol. This preliminary study suggests the possibility of determining non-invasively the elastic properties of a living, functioning aorta using CTA data.

Comparison of aortic root dimension changes during cardiac cycle between the patients with and without aortic valve calcification using ECG-gated 64-slice and dual-source 256-slice computed tomography scanners: results of a multicenter study.

With advent of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, using multislice computed tomography (MSCT) to provide detailed data about aortic root has become more crucial. We compared aortic dimension changes during cardiac cycle in patients with and without aortic valve calcification and evaluated its correlation with aortic valve calcium score in former group. Fifty-two patients with and 52 subjects without aortic valve calcification underwent coronary MSCT using two 64-slice and a dual-source 256-slice CT scanners. Aortic root dimensions were measured in both systolic and diastolic phases. Changes in annular maximum diameter (D(max)), minimum diameter (D(min)), cross sectional area and perimeter, three diameters of sinuses of Valsalva (V(a), V(b) and V(c)), sinotubular junction maximum (STJ(max)) and minimum (STJ(min)) diameters between systolic and diastolic phases (systole minus diastole) were -0.59 mm, -0.05 mm, -2.53 mm(2), -1.48 mm, +0.91 mm, +1.08 mm, +0.42 mm, +0.63 mm, +0.40 mm and in those without aortic calcification -0.33 mm, 0.00 mm, -6.92 mm(2), -0.41 mm, +0.30 mm, +0.38 mm, +0.61 mm, +0.33 mm, +0.20 mm in patients with aortic calcification, respectively. Apart from two diameters in sinuses of Valsalva (V(a) and V(b)), changes in all other diameters of aortic root during cardiac cycle were not significantly different between the two groups. Furthermore, in patients with aortic calcification, no significant correlation was detected between changes in nearly all aortic root dimensions during cardiac cycle and aortic valve calcium score or location of calcification (annular, commissural or both).