FIVE-YEAR VISUAL OUTCOME OF TREATMENT FOR RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY IN INFANTS WEIGHING <500 G AT BIRTH: A Multicenter Cohort Study From J-CREST.

PURPOSE: To investigate the 5-year treatment outcomes of retinopathy of prematurity in infants <500 g birth weight and compare laser and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study comprised 24 eyes of 13 patients treated for Type 1 retinopathy of prematurity, followed for 5 years. Initial treatment was laser and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in 13 and 11 eyes, respectively. Data collected included sex, birth characteristics, retinopathy of prematurity characteristics at the time of treatment, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent, and astigmatism at 5 years posttreatment. RESULTS: Median BCVA was 0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (interquartile range, 0.0-0.5). Snellen BCVA was ≥20/40 in 73% and ≥20/20 in 27% of eyes. Median spherical equivalent was -2.37 (interquartile range, -6.1 to -0.1); 75% had myopia (≤-0.5 D), and 25% had high myopia (≤-6.0 D). Median astigmatism was 1.25 (interquartile range, 0.9-3.0); 46% had ≥1.5 D. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-treated eyes showed less myopia ( P < 0.009), with no BCVA or astigmatism difference ( P = 0.997, P = 0.271) compared with laser-treated eyes. CONCLUSION: One-quarter of the eyes exhibited good visual acuity (Snellen BCVA of ≥20/20) 5 years after retinopathy of prematurity treatment. Refractive errors were common. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy may be superior to laser therapy in myopic refractive error.

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) combined with allogeneic intrastromal lenticule inlay for hyperopia with astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To quantitatively evaluate outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) combined with allogeneic intrastromal lenticule inlay for hyperopia with astigmatism. METHODS: It's a retrospective cohort study. Twenty-four eyes of 15 patients with more than 0.75 diopters (D) of astigmatism in hyperopic eyes were enrolled in this study. The hyperopic eye with astigmatism was first treated with SMILE to correct astigmatism; then a lenticule was extracted from a donor myopic eye and subsequently implanted into the hyperopic eye with astigmatism. Patients were examined preoperatively and 1 day, 1 week, 1,3 months and 1 year after surgery. The main outcome measures were the uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), spherical equivalent (SE), corneal topography, anterior segment optical coherence topography (OCT) and ocular response analyzer (ORA) parameters: corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). Repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests were used to analyze data of different follow-up visits. RESULTS: The mean preoperative cylinder was 1.95±1.04(D). The UDVA (from 0.37±0.23 to 0.09±0.09), UNVA (from 0.49±0.21 to 0.08±0.06), SE (from +7.42±3.12 to -0.75±0.79) and astigmatism (+1.95±1.04 to -0.65±0.63) postoperatively were obviously better than those before surgery. Five eyes (26.3%) gained one line of CDVA, and 3 eyes (15.8%) gained two lines of CDVA one year after surgery compared with preoperative levels. The average corneal curvature was changed from (43.19±4.37) D to (49.19±3.87) D one year after surgery. The anterior segment OCT images of corneas with lenticule inlays at each follow-up visit showed that the implanted lenticule was shaped like a crescent in the corneal stroma. The CH and CRF didn't change significantly after surgery (p = 0.189 and p = 0.107respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SMILE combined with intrastromal lenticule inlay can be used to correct high hyperopia with astigmatism with good safety, efficacy and reproducibility.

[Characteristics and analysis of corneal astigmatism in age-related cataract patients over 50 years old].

Objective: To investigate the relationship between corneal astigmatism and age, axial length (AL) in age-related cataract patients over 50 years old. Methods: In this retrospective study, 1 906 eyes of 953 patients with age-related cataract were diagnosed from February 2016 to August 2016 atPeking University People's Hospital, and their demographics, preoperative AL, magnitude and meridian of the corneal astigmatism measured by IOL Master were collected. Restricted cubic splines and Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to investigate the relationship of the magnitude of cornea astigmatism to age. Chi-square test was used to assess the relationship of the meridian of astigmatism to age, AL and the magnitude of cornea astigmatism. Results: The patients were 410 men and 543 women. The corneal astigmatism was with-the-rule (WTR) in 570 eyes (29.91%), against-the-rule (ATR) in 1 005 eyes (52.73%) and oblique in 331 eyes (17.37%). The mean age was (72±9) years old. The medians (min, max) of AL and corneal astigmatism magnitude were 23.49 mm (19.83 mm to 33.89 mm) and 0.97 D (0.06 D to 4.65 D) in right eyes and 23.41 mm (17.54 mm to 32.09 mm) and 0.92 D (0.11 D to 4.88 D) in left eyes, respectively. The corneal astigmatism was ≥0.75 D in 64.95% (619/953) of the right eyes and 61.59% (587/953) of the left eyes. Among the elderly patients over 65 years old, when the AL was between 22.00-25.99 mm (r=0.186-0.279), the value of corneal astigmatism was positively correlated with age (all P<0.01) in both eyes. The value of ATR corneal astigmatism was positively correlated with age (right eyes, r=0.278, P<0.01; left eyes, r=0.225, P<0.01), while the value of WTR corneal astigmatism had no statistically significant correlation with age (right eyes, P=0.335; left eyes, P=0.633). The prevalence of WTR astigmatism decreased with age from 43.81% (46/105) to 20.73% (51/246) in right eyes and from 40.00% (42/105) to 24.80% (61/246) in left eyes, while the prevalence of ATR astigmatism increased with age from 38.10% (40/105) to 61.38% (151/246) in right eyes and from 33.33% (35/105) to 58.94% (145/246) in left eyes. The prevalence of oblique astigmatism was not significantly changed with age (right eyes, χ(2)=31.986, P<0.01; left eyes, χ(2)=27.686, P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of corneal astigmatism meridians between different AL groups (right eyes, P=0.497; left eyes, P=0.897). With the increase of the magnitude of corneal astigmatism, the prevalence of oblique astigmatism significantly decreased from 25.45% (85/334) to 0 in right eyes and from 29.78% (109/366) to 1.35% (1/74) in left eyes, while the prevalence of ATR astigmatism significantly increased from 39.82% (133/334) to 79.27% (65/82) in right eyes and from 41.80% (153/366) to 59.46% (44/74) in left eyes (right eyes, χ(2)=72.229, P<0.01; left eyes, χ(2)=72.166, P<0.01). Conclusions: A majority of age-related cataract patients over 50 years old have astigmatism ≥0.75 D before cataract surgery. When the AL is between 22.00 mm and 25.99 mm, the magnitude of corneal astigmatism increases with age among people over 65 years old, especially the magnitude of ATR corneal astigmatism, while the magnitude of WTR corneal astigmatism has no obvious increase with age. The percentage of ATR astigmatism increases while the percentage of WTR astigmatism decreases with age. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2020, 56: 349-355).

[Comparison of the visual quality at 1 year following femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, wavefront-guided femtosecond LASIK and small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism].

Objective: To investigate mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) and high-order aberrations after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK), wavefront-guided femtosecond LASIK (WF-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia and astigmatism. Methods: In this case-control study, 212 eyes of 108 patients with myopia and astigmatism from September 2014 to September 2016 were treated by refractive surgery. There were 34 males (66 eyes) and 74 females (146 = eyes), aged 27 (24, 32) years. They were divided into 3 groups, with 37 patients (71 eyes), 35 patients (69 eyes) and 36 patients (72 eyes) treated by FS-LASIK, WF-LASIK and SMILE, respectively. Refraction diopters, corneal tomography, wavefront aberrations and contrast sensitivity were evaluated before and at 12 months after surgery. The results of different groups were compared by rank sum test. Results: At 12 = months of follow-up, 69 eyes (97.18%) treated by FS-LASIK, 67 eyes (97.10%) by WF-LASIK and 69 eyes (95.83%) by SMILE had the uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Fifty-nine eyes (83.10%) treated by FS-LASIK, 60 eyes (86.96%) by WF-LASIK and 61 eyes (84.72%) by SMILE had better postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity than preoperative corrected distance visual acuity. Surface regularity index of the WF-LASIK group decreased from 0.11 (0.07, 0.28) to 0.07 (0.06, 0.20) (Z=-2.662, P=0.008), which was less than that of the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (Z=-3.236, -3.118, P=0.001, 0.000). Surface asymmetry index of the WF-LASIK group increased from 0.34 (0.25, 0.43) to 0.38 (0.30, 0.52) (Z=-2.140, P=0.032), which was less than that of the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (Z=-2.910, -3.779, P=0.004, 0.000). The root mean square of high-order of the FS-LASIK group increased from 0.32 (0.27, 0.41) to 0.53 (0.40, 0.65) (Z=-6.228, P=0.000), which was more than that of the WF-LASIK and SMILE groups (Z=-3.595, -4.806, P=0.000, 0.000). Coma of the WF-LASIK group increased from 0.16 (0.11, 0.24) to 0.26 (0.15, 0.37) (Z=-3.816, P=0.000), which was less than that of the FS-LASIK group (Z=-3.528, P=0.000). Spherical aberration of the FS-LASIK and WF-LASIK groups increased from 0.10 (0.05, 0.21) and 0.08 (0.04, 0.12) to 0.24 (0.13, 0.34) and 0.15 (0.09, 0.26), respectively (Z=-5.141, -4.864, P=0.000, 0.000), which were more than that of the SMILE group (Z=-2.549, -4.682, P=0.011, 0.000). CS of the WF-LASIK group at 12 cycles per degree (c/d) increased from 1.34 (1.18, 1.48) to 1.48 (1.34, 1.63) (Z=-2.985, P=0.003), which was more than that of the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (Z=-3.194, -2.977, P=0.001, 0.003). CS with glare of the WF-LASIK group at 12.0 c/d increased from 1.26 (1.18, 1.34) to 1.34 (1.34, 1.63) (Z=-3.608, P=0.000), which was more than that of the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (Z=-4.033, -2.913, P=0.000, 0.004). Conclusions: FS-LASIK, WF-LASIK and SMILE achieved ideal visual outcomes at 12 months postoperatively. WF-LASIK treated eyes showed the best corneal symmetry, the least increase of high-order aberrations and the best visual quality among three kinds of surgeries. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2020, 56: 118-125).

[Comparison of Long-term Results with Small Incision Refractive Lenticule Extraction (ReLEX SMILE) vs. Femto-LASIK]. / Vergleich der Langzeitergebnisse bei Small Incision Refractive Lenticule Extraction (ReLEx SMILE) und Femto-LASIK.

AIM: Our aim was to retrospectively compare ReLEx Smile to femtosecondlaser-assisted LASIK (FsLASIK, femto-LASIK) in terms of safety, efficacy, stability as well as intraoperative complications. Comparable studies only show the results over the course of 3 years, making our data the first to examine longer term results. MATERIALS/METHODS: To accomplish this, we compared 404 eyes after FsLASIK (Mel 80, Carl Zeiss Meditec) and 1192 eyes after ReLEx SMILE (VisuMax, Carl Zeiss Meditec). We collected patients' data at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after refractive surgery. RESULTS: Five years postoperatively, the 2 methods showed equally good results in all investigated parameters. Over the course of these 5 years, the ReLEx SMILE achieved significantly better results for safety (p < 0.05) after 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. The results for visual acuity were significantly better for ReLEx SMILE after 1, 2 and 3 years. The predictability of both methods was consistently good over the entire period of time and intraoperative complications were equally low. CONCLUSION: After retrospective analysis of the visual outcomes of our patients up to 5 years after surgery, the ReLEx SMILE method turned out to be at least as safe and efficient as the FsLASIK. The stability of the refractive outcome was equally good with the 2 methods. Due to the high level of satisfaction experienced by the patients, high patient comfort intra- and postoperatively, absence of dry eyes, and the absence of flap complications, ReLEx SMILE has replaced the FsLASIK in our daily practice and become our method of choice for corneal refractive surgery when it comes to the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism by Implantation of a Phakic Posterior Chamber Implantable Collamer Lens.

AIM: We analysed two years results in patients with correction of moderate-to-high myopia or myopic astigmatism by implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular Impantable Collamer Lens (ICL). METHODS: To the retrospective study were included 63 eyes of 32 patients (3 men, 29 women), who underwent implantation of ICL between 2007 - 2016 in the outpatient Department of Ophthalmology clinic, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, to correction moderate-to-high myopia or myopic astigmatism. We assess uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), subjective refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density (ECD) and the incidence of complications in the two years follow-up period. RESULTS: At the time of implantation was the mean patients age 28,14 ± 5,35 years (range 21 to 36 years). In 16 eyes was implanted ICM V4 model, in 23 eyes VICMO, in 2 eyes TICM V4, in 13 eyes VTICMO and in 9 eyes VTICM. The mean preoperative subjective refraction improved from -7,8 ± 2,7 D sf (range -14 to -3,25 D sf) and -0,65 ± 0,8 D cyl (range -3,25 to 0 D cyl) to -0,01 ± 0,1 D sf (range -0,75 to 0 D sf) and -0,05 ± 0,16 D cyl (range -0,55 až 0 D cyl). The mean ECD value was 3270,5 ± 454,7 cells/mm2 (range 2155 to 4201 cells/mm2) compared to 2803,4 ± 441,8 cells/mm2 (range 2079 to 4184 cells/mm2) at the end of our follow-up period. The percentage loss of ECD two years after the surgery was 13,5%. The mean preoperative value of intraocular pressure (IOP) was 15,0 ± 2,9 mmHg (range 10 to 20 mmHg) and 15,2 ± 2,5 mmHg (range 10 to 20 mmHg) at the end of follow-up period. We observed the elevation of IOP over 21 mmHg 1 month postoperatively in 11 eyes. In 9 eyes was IOP until 35 mmHg (27,7 ± 3,74, range 22 to 34 mmHg), in a one case (both eyes of the same patient) over 50 mmHg. Postoperatively we observed following complications: IOP elevation (11 eyes), decentration of ICL with development of subcapsular opacity in the crystallin lens periphery (1 eye), pigment dispersion without elevation of IOP (1 eye) and incidence of optical phenomenon (4 patients). The explantation of ICL was indicated in one patient bilaterally. CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience is the correction of moderate-to-high myopia or myopic astigmatism by implanation of ICL an effective, relative safe and predictable method. It has an important place in the modern refractive surgery, especially in patients, who are not able to undergo the photorefractive corneal surgery to correct their refractive errors. Key words: Implantable Collamer Lens, phakic intraocular lens, myopia, myopic astigmatism.

An approach for simulating the fitting of rigid gas-permeable contact lenses using 3D printing technology.

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new approach to simulatethe fitting process of rigid gas-permeable (RGP) contact lenses using 3D printing technology. METHODS: A hemispherical or parabolic 3D model was created using 3D Builder or Tinkercad software. The horizontal and vertical diameters and the hemispherical or ellipsoid height were adjusted to simulate different morphologies of the corneal anterior surface. After exporting the file in stereo lithography (STL) format, a solid model was printed using a 3D printer and was used to simulate RGP contact lens fitting. RESULTS: Limited by the precision of the entry-level 3D printer which was used in this study, the print-outs of the corneal models were crude, but the models were tested for their ability to simulate common corneal morphologies with no corneal astigmatism and different axial corneal astigmatism. Compared with some built-in simulation programs for corneal topography, the solid models generated by 3D printing could well simulate the positioning of the lens under the influence of gravity and the eyelid, as well as lens eccentricity or the bubbles under lenses caused by an improper wearing method. CONCLUSION: 3D printing technology can be well applied in the simulation of RGP contact lens fitting, which may become a new teaching method in optometry.

Effect of incision on visual outcomes after implantation of a trifocal diffractive IOL.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate visual acuity, corneal astigmatism and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after implantation of trifocal diffractive IOLs operated with either a corneal steep-axis incision or 135° incision. METHOD: This prospective study enrolled patients randomly assigned to different groups. According to preoperative corneal astigmatism, 101 eyes of 77 patients were assigned into group A1 (0 ~ 0.50 D) or A2 (0.51 ~ 1.00 D) with a corneal steep-axis incision or group B1 (0 ~ 0.50 D) or B2 (0.51 ~ 1.00 D) with a 135° incision. Visual acuity, corneal astigmatism and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were followed-up for 3 months. RESULTS: Corneal astigmatism in group A2 significantly decreased 3 months after surgery (P < 0.01) and was significantly lower than that in group B2 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively (all values of P < 0.01). The following parameters were better in group A2 than in group B2: uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months (P = 0.00, 0.00, 0.01, 0.01, respectively);uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 1 day and 2 weeks (P = 0.00, 0.01); and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 1 day, 2 weeks, and 1 month postoperatively (P = 0.00, 0.01, 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: After a corneal steep-axis incision, patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism of 0.51 D to 1.00 D exhibited reduced corneal astigmatism and achieved better UIVA and early postoperative UDVA/UNVA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively Registered Trials ISRCTN10086721 , 23/06/2018.

[Value the correction of corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery].

The aim of modern micro-incision phacoemulsification combined with foldable intraocular lens implantation and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery is evolving from a simple pursuit of recuperation to a refractive procedure, which involves the correction of ametropia according to preoperative and postoperative refractive conditions, especially corneal astigmatism, in order to achieve the goal of optimized postoperative uncorrected full range of vision. Nowadays, due attention to the effect of preoperative corneal astigmatism, surgery-induced astigmatism and residual astigmatism after operation is lacked, which affect postoperative visual acuity significantly. There are many effective ways to reduce corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery including selecting appropriate size and location of clear corneal incision, employing astigmatism keratotomy and the implantation of Toric intraocular lenses, which need to be appropriately applied and popularized. At the same time, surgical indications, predictability and safety should also be taken into account.(Chin J Ophthalmol, 2018, 54: 321-323).

Oregon Elks Children's Eye Clinic vision screening results for astigmatism.

BACKGROUND: In the Elks Preschool Vision Screening program, which uses the plusoptiX S12 to screen children 36-60 months of age, the most common reason for over-referral, using the 1.50 D referral criterion, was found to be astigmatism. The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy of the 2.25 D referral criterion for astigmatism to the 1.50 D referral criterion using screening data from 2013-2014. METHODS: Vision screenings were conducted on Head Start children 36-72 months of age by Head Start teachers and Elks Preschool Vision Screening staff using the plusoptiX S12. Data on 4,194 vision screenings in 2014 and 4,077 in 2013 were analyzed. Area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis were performed to determine the optimal referral criteria. A t test and scatterplot analysis were performed to compare how many children required treatment using the different criteria. RESULTS: The medical records of 136 (2.25 D) and 117 children (1.50 D) who were referred by the plusoptiX screening for potential astigmatism and received dilated eye examinations from their local eye doctors were reviewed retrospectively. Mean subject age was 4 years. Treatment for astigmatism was prescribed to 116 of 136 using the 2.25 D setting compared to 60 of 117 using the 1.50 D setting. CONCLUSIONS: In 2013 the program used the 1.50 D setting for astigmatism. Changing the astigmatism setting to 2.25 D; , 85% of referrals required treatment, reducing false positives by 34%.

Correction of hyperopia with astigmatism following radial keratotomy with daily disposable plus spherical contact lens: a case report.

PURPOSE: To report the refractive correction in a case of hyperopia and astigmatism following radial keratotomy. METHODS: A case report. RESULTS: A 47-year-old woman, who had undergone refractive surgery for radial keratotomy in both eyes 22 years before the present study, presented to our clinic with blurred vision. Her best corrected visual acuity, with spectacle correction of +3.50 DS/-1.50 DCX130° in the right eye and +3.75 DS/-1.50 DCX80° in the left eye, was 0.2 logMAR and 0.3 logMAR, respectively. Her keratometric readings were 35.75 D/36.75 D at 74° and 35.25 D/36.25 D at 61°, respectively. Prompted by intolerance to glasses, the patient requested for contact lenses. First, we applied a rigid, gas-permeable contact lens. However, we noted poor fitting due to central corneal flattening. Subsequently, we applied a conventional plus spherical soft contact lens (PSSCL), which is thick in the center and can therefore correct hyperopia and low-grade astigmatism simultaneously. The conventional PSSCL showed slightly inferior decentration, with good movement, and the patient was satisfied with it. After ascertaining the patient's living habits, we decided that a daily disposable soft contact lens would most meet her needs. The final prescription was a daily disposable PSSCL; the patient was satisfied with her corrected visual acuity of 0.0 logMAR in the right eye and 0.0 logMAR in left eye. Her daily disposable PSSCL-corrected visual acuity was stable during the 10-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: For patients displaying hyperopia with astigmatism following radial keratotomy, the PSSCL may confer better corrected visual acuity and acceptability.

Beginnings of Astigmatism Understanding and Management in the 19th Century.

Within the last 200 years, the perception of astigmatism has evolved from that of an infrequent and peculiar defect of the eye to a distortion almost as common as spherical refractive errors. Most of the significant findings on this condition were made in the 19th century, including the first description by Thomas Young (1773-1829) and the introduction of the treatment methods used today. The purpose of this study was to investigate the milestones in the understanding and management of astigmatism that occurred up to the year 1900. This fascinating history illustrates how knowledge evolves across time, geographical areas, and interdisciplinary boundaries. The first article looking at the use of a cylindrical lens to correct astigmatism was written by George Airy (1801-1892) in 1825. The term "astigmatism" was introduced in by William Whewell (1794-1866) in 1846. Methods for subjective and objective evaluation were subsequently established, including the introduction of a cross cylinder, keratoscope, astigmatic dial, and the development of retinoscopy and ophthalmoscopy. In the last two decades of the 19th century, the first attempt to alter the refraction in astigmatic patients by changing the shape of the cornea was made. It must be noted that diverse challenges were encountered in this field on the way to the development of a treatment, including the technical manufacture of a lens, the precise measurement of the refractive error, and understanding the optical properties of the eye. The importance of the 19th century was that interdisciplinary cooperation, such as that seen in this study, between physicists and astronomers, and mathematicians and physicians, led to the development of comprehensive knowledge on astigmatism.

[Refractive Lens Exchange]. / Refraktiver Linsenaustausch.

In refractive surgery the removal of the natural lens followed by implantation of an artificial intraocular lens has been an established method to treat refractive errors. The term "clear lens exchange" separates this approach from cataract surgery, where a cloudy lens has to be removed. With regard to currently available intraocular lens technologies, there is a wide range to correct myopia, hyperopia as well as astigmatism. Trifocal or extended depth-of-focus lenses (EDOF) even with a toric component offer the patients a potential benefit to further address presbyopia, respectively. Furthermore, the surgery in combination with Femtosecond laser-assistance offers more precision to this highly elective approach.This article provides an overview about currently available procedures and implants to correct presbyopia and refractive errors. A thorough evaluation of risk and benefit for each patient group is given with regard to recent guidelines of the German Commission for Refractive Surgery (KRC).

The Effect of Lens Sphere and Cylinder Power on Residual Astigmatism and Its Resolution After Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation.

PURPOSE: To analyze correlations between residual refractive cylinder (and its correction through lens reorientation) with the sphere and cylinder power of the toric intraocular lens (IOL) implanted. METHODS: An online toric back-calculator (www.astigmatismfix.com) allows users to input toric IOL planning data, along with postoperative IOL orientation and refractive results; these data are used to determine the optimal orientation of the IOL to reduce refractive astigmatism. This was a retrospective data analysis; aggregate historical data were extracted from this calculator to investigate the relationship between residual refractive astigmatism and IOL cylinder and sphere power. RESULTS: A total of 12,812 records, 4,619 of which included IOL sphere power, were available for analysis. There was no significant effect of sphere power on residual refractive astigmatism (P = .25), but lower IOL cylinder powers were associated with significantly lower residual refractive astigmatism (P < .05). The difference between the intended and ideal orientation was higher in the lower IOL cylinder power groups (P < .01). Overcorrection of astigmatism was significantly more likely with higher IOL cylinder power (P < .01), but not with sphere power (P = .33). Reorientation to correct residual refractive cylinder to less than 0.50 diopters (D) was more successful with IOL cylinder powers of 1.50 D or less (P < .01); IOL sphere power had no apparent effect. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant effects of IOL cylinder power on residual refractive astigmatism, the difference between intended and ideal orientation, the likelihood of overcorrection, and the likelihood of astigmatism reduction with lens reorientation. IOL sphere power appeared to have no such effects. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(3):157-162.].

Toric intraocular lenses in eyes with with-the-rule, against-the-rule, and oblique astigmatism: One-year results.

PURPOSE: To assess 1-year clinical results of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in eyes having with-the-rule (WTR), against-the-rule (ATR), or oblique corneal astigmatism. SETTING: Four ophthalmic surgical sites, Japan. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: One of 3 toric IOLs or 1 nontoric IOL was implanted in eyes having phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. RESULTS: The study comprised 218 eyes (155 patients). Based on the suggestion of an online toric calculator with anterior corneal curvature data, 63 eyes received the SN6AT3 IOL with a cylinder power of 1.50 diopters [D] at IOL plane (1.50 D cylinder IOL) 55 eyes the SN6AT4 IOL with a cylinder power of 2.25 D at IOL plane (2.25 D cylinder IOL), and 58 eyes the SN6AT5 IOL with a cylinder power of 3.00 D at IOL plane (3.00 D cylinder IOL) (all Acrysof IQ toric), and 42 eyes received the SN60WF IOL (nontoric IOL). One hundred ninety-four eyes (89.0%) completed 1-year of follow-up. The centroid error in predicted residual astigmatism calculated using vector analysis was close to the origin in eyes with WTR astigmatism (0.17 diopter [D] @ 174.9 ± 0.54 D), while those with ATR and oblique astigmatism were significantly shifted toward the ATR direction (P < .001). The distance from the origin was significantly smaller in the WTR group than in ATR and oblique groups (P < .05). The centroid errors were shifted toward ATR in all toric IOL groups (P < .001); however, the distance from the origin was not different between groups (P = .52). Postoperatively, the mean absolute misalignment of the IOLs was 5.92 degrees ± 5.59 (SD) at 1 day and 6.24 ± 5.87 degrees at 1 year. The results of other clinical parameters were excellent, with no significant differences between astigmatism categories or IOL models. CONCLUSION: Based on anterior corneal curvature alone, toric IOLs undercorrected ATR and oblique astigmatism; however, 1-year clinical results of toric IOLs were highly stable and satisfactory. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Outcome of adjustment for posterior corneal curvature in toric intraocular lens calculation and selection.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of the cylinder power choice and the astigmatic refractive outcome for toric intraocular lenses (IOLs), the cylinder power of which was calculated using the Goggin nomogram that allows for the likely effect of posterior corneal astigmatism. SETTING: The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: The absolute value of the prediction error of the toric IOL cylinder power effect in consecutive eyes with preoperative anterior keratometric cylinder values of 1.0 diopter (D) or more was compared with the absolute value of the prediction error in a historical control group. The anteriorly measured keratometric cylinder values were altered by 2 coefficients of adjustment, one for with-the-rule eyes and one for against-the-rule eyes, before calculation of the IOL cylinder power to be implanted. In the controls, unadjusted keratometric cylinder values were used. RESULTS: The case-series group comprised 31 eyes (29 patients) and the control group, 65 eyes. The absolute error in prediction of the toric IOL cylinder power effect was reduced from a median of 0.45 D (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.58) in the controls to a median of 0.23 D (95% CI, 0.13-0.35) in the adjusted eyes (P = .004). CONCLUSION: Adjustment of toric IOL cylinder power by application of a coefficient of adjustment to anteriorly measured keratometric cylinder values based on the keratometric rule of the eye led to a clinically and statistically significant improvement in refractive astigmatic outcome. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Visual Rehabilitation After Penetrating Keratoplasty.

OBJECTIVES: Here, our aim was to report our treatment strategies and their results performed for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 98 patients (54 male/44 female), with results from 104 eyes, who underwent penetrating keratoplasty between January 2013 and January 2015 at the Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology were reviewed. Patient age, indication for penetrating keratoplasty, interventions performed for visual rehabilitation, follow-up duration, topographic and refractive astigmatism at the end of follow-up, and final best corrected visual acuity results were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 54 ± 23 years. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty included keratoconus, Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, and corneal scarring. The mean duration of follow-up was 23 ± 11.5 months. Topography-guided suture adjustment and selective suture removal were performed 2 to 6 weeks and after 3 months in eyes with more than 3 diopters of corneal astigmatism in patients who had continuous and interrupted sutures. Spectacle correction was administered for 86 eyes (83%), and contact lenses including rigid gas-permeable and scleral lenses were fitted in 18 eyes (17%) in patients who were unsatisfied with spectacle correction. Relaxing corneal incisions were performed in 23 eyes (22%), and toric intraocular lens implantations were performed in 34 eyes (33%) with cataracts. The mean topographic and absolute refractive astigmatism at the end of follow-up was 3.4 ± 2.6 and 3.6 ± 1.9 diopters. CONCLUSIONS: Topography-guided suture adjustment and selective suture removal are effective for minimizing early postoperative astigmatism. If significant astigmatism remains after suture removal, which cannot be corrected by optical means, then further surgical procedures including relaxing incisions and toric intraocular lens implantation can be performed.

Clinical outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.

UNLABELLED: Small-incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) provide good visual outcomes and an efficacious correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism with similar levels of safety. Some differences in predictability and the percentage of eyes gaining lines of corrected distance visual acuity are present. A higher level of coma is present after small-incision lenticule extraction, with no clear differences between techniques in spherical aberration. Better contrast sensitivity is achieved in the early postoperative period after wavefront-guided femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, possibly because of less intrastromal light backscattering and Bowman layer microdistortions. Corneal sensitivity decreased less after small-incision lenticule extraction because of less severe decrease in subbasal nerve density, which has a significant effect on symptomatology and dry-eye tests (P < .05). Significant corneal biomechanical changes occurred after both techniques (P < .05), with no scientific evidence supporting the superiority of 1 technique over the other. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Piñero received an unrestricted educational grant from Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.