Clinical effects of atorvastatin combined with conbercept in the treatment of patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion and carotid plaque: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs have been widely used in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO); however, recurrence is a major concern. This study aims to observe the clinical effects of atorvastatin and intravitreal therapy in the treatment of patients with branch or central RVO-ME and coexistent carotid plaques (CP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Sixty-four patients diagnosed with branch or central RVO-ME and coexistent CP will be enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the control and experimental groups. The control group will be treated with intravitreal conbercept monthly for 3 months, followed by monthly evaluation and injection of pro re nata (PRN) for 12 months, while the experimental group will be treated with oral atorvastatin 20 mg daily combined with the control group treatment. If a drop of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is more than five Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (one line) or an increment in central subfield thickness (CSFT) of 100 µm (or a 10% increment from the previous visit), intravitreal re-treatment will be performed. Outcome measurements include CSFT, BCVA, number of injections, and incidence of adverse events during the 12-month follow-up period. Differences between groups will be evaluated using Student's t-test, and comparisons between groups will be evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing, China (approval number 2023KY0418-12, dated 18 April 2023), and has been registered on chictr.org.cn. Written informed consent will be collected from each patient and the results of this trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300071359. Registered on 12 May 2023.

Combination therapy of metformin and atorvastatin against benzopyrene-induced lung cancer via inflammatory signaling pathway.

The most prevalent cause of lung cancer is smoking tobacco, but exposure to second hand smoke, air pollution, and certain chemicals and substances at work can also raise the risk of disease. In this study, we scrutinized the chemoprotective effect of the metformin and atorvastatin combination against benzo[a]pyrene (BaP)-induced lung cancer in mice of Swiss albino. BaP (50 mg/kg) was used for induction of lung cancer and mice were treated with metformin, atorvastatin or their combination. Metformin + atorvastatin combination significantly (p< 0.001) improved the body weight, liver weight, suppressed the lung weight and tumor incidence and altered the levels of immunocompetent cells, polyamines, lung tumor markers, lung parameters and antioxidant parameters, respectively. Metformin + atorvastatin combination also suppressed cytokines levels, inflammatory parameters and caspase parameters. On the basis of the results, we can conclude that metformin + atorvastatin combination remarkably suppressed lung cancer via the inflammatory pathway.

Atorvastatin-associated myotoxicity: A toxicokinetic review of pharmacogenetic associations to evaluate the feasibility of precision pharmacotherapy.

Atorvastatin (ATV) and other statins are highly effective in reducing cholesterol levels. However, in some patients, the development of drug-associated muscle side effects remains an issue as it compromises the adherence to treatment. Since the toxicity is dose-dependent, exploring factors modulating pharmacokinetics (PK) appears fundamental. The purpose of this review aims at reporting the current state of knowledge about the singular genetic susceptibilities influencing the risk of developing ATV muscle adverse events through PK modulations. Multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in efflux (ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2, ABCC4 and ABCG2) and influx (SLCO1B1, SLCO1B3 and SLCO2B1) transporters have been explored for their association with ATV PK modulation or with statin-related myotoxicities (SRM) development. The most convincing pharmacogenetic association with ATV remains the influence of the rs4149056 (c.521 T > C) in SLCO1B1 on ATV PK and pharmacodynamics. This SNP has been robustly associated with increased ATV systemic exposure and consequently, an increased risk of SRM. Additionally, the SNP rs2231142 (c.421C > A) in ABCG2 has also been associated with increased drug exposure and higher risk of SRM occurrence. SLCO1B1 and ABCG2 pharmacogenetic associations highlight that modulation of ATV systemic exposure is important to explain the risk of developing SRM. However, some novel observations credit the hypothesis that additional genes (e.g. SLCO2B1 or ABCC1) might be important for explaining local PK modulations within the muscle tissue, indicating that studying the local PK directly at the skeletal muscle level might pave the way for additional understanding.

ASSOCIATION OF SOLUTE CARRIER ORGANIC ANION TRANSPORTER 1B1 GENE POLYMORPHISM WITH RESPONSE TO ATORVASTATIN AND ASSOCIATED MYOPATHY IN IRAQI DYSLIPIDEMIA PATIENTS.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: The study aims to investigate the effect of solute carriers organic anions transporters 1B1 (SLCO1B1) gene polymorphisms rs4149056, rs2306283, rs55901008, and rs729559745 in a sample of patients with dyslipidemia, and relate it to atorvastatin response and associated myopathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: A cross sectional enrolled 200 patients both males and females of Arabic race, Iraqi nationality aged between 30-65 years. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (Atorvastatin responders and tolerant), Group 2 (Atorvastatin non responder and intolerant). Blood samples collected from the patients for biochemical studies and analyzed statistically by Student T-test and Chi-square, and DNA extracted for polymerase chains reactions (PCR). RESULTS: Results: The results showed insignificant association P≥0.05 between the demographic characteristics of the study population with different genotypes, and significant difference P<0.05 in the biochemical parameters regarding (T-cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoproteins, and Creatine kinase-MM) when comparing the two groups. Odds ratio (OR) with confidence intervals CI (95%) used to evaluate the risk association to develop myopathy and poor response to atorvastatin therapy show relevant association for CC and CT genotype of rs4149056, while rs2306283 GG genotype show low association, also rs55901008 show low association for CC genotype, and moderate association for rs72559745 genotypes GG, AG. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The mutant allele's genotypes of rs4149056, rs55901008, and rs72559745, and the wild allele genotype of rs2306283 show significant association with the development of poor response to atorvastatin and elevated the level of CK-MM plasma concentration.

Unveiling the Rare Complication: Statin-Induced Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy.

BACKGROUND Statin-induced necrotizing autoimmune myopathy is an exceptionally rare yet severe complication of statin therapy that may develop in individuals at any time during their exposure to statins. The development of proximal muscle weakness, muscle pain, and elevated creatine kinase (CK) levels in patients while taking statins should prompt clinical consideration of statin-induced myopathy. The pathophysiology arises from the production of auto-antibodies, which target the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) enzyme, leading to the aggressive breakdown of myofibrils. CASE REPORT Here, we present a case of a 59-year-old woman with a medical history of dyslipidemia who developed anti-HMG-CoA reductase antibodies after taking atorvastatin. She came to the emergency department with complaints of severe proximal muscle weakness. The laboratory workup showed an elevated CK level up to 12 000 IU/L. Despite discontinuing atorvastatin, the patient's elevated CK levels persisted. The patient underwent a muscle biopsy, demonstrating myofibril necrosis. Serological analysis showed anti-HMG-CoA reductase antibodies in the patient's serum, which led to the diagnosis of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy due to statins. The patient's statin therapy was promptly discontinued, and she was treated with a high dose of IV corticosteroids. After the patient's discharge, brief discontinuation of the corticosteroids resulted in CK elevation and a return of symptoms. This led to the second re-admission and restarting of corticosteroids until stabilization and discharge. CONCLUSIONS This case represents an important reminder for clinicians to recognize the possibility of statin-induced immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy in patients presenting with proximal muscle weakness while taking a statin, notwithstanding the rarity of this condition.

Rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin treatment in adults with coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the randomised LODESTAR trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long term efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin treatment in adults with coronary artery disease. DESIGN: Randomised, open label, multicentre trial. SETTING: 12 hospitals in South Korea, September 2016 to November 2019. PARTICIPANTS: 4400 adults (age ≥19 years) with coronary artery disease. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were assigned to receive either rosuvastatin (n=2204) or atorvastatin (n=2196) using 2×2 factorial randomisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a three year composite of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularisation. Secondary outcomes were safety endpoints: new onset diabetes mellitus; hospital admissions due to heart failure; deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism; endovascular revascularisation for peripheral artery disease; aortic intervention or surgery; end stage kidney disease; discontinuation of study drugs owing to intolerance; cataract surgery; and a composite of laboratory detected abnormalities. RESULTS: 4341 of the 4400 participants (98.7%) completed the trial. Mean daily dose of study drugs was 17.1 mg (standard deviation (SD) 5.2 mg) in the rosuvastatin group and 36.0 (12.8) mg in the atorvastatin group at three years (P<0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 189 participants (8.7%) in the rosuvastatin group and 178 (8.2%) in the atorvastatin group (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.30; P=0.58). The mean low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level during treatment was 1.8 mmol/L (SD 0.5 mmol/L) in the rosuvastatin group and 1.9 (0.5) mmol/L in the atorvastatin group (P<0.001). The rosuvastatin group had a higher incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus requiring initiation of antidiabetics (7.2% v 5.3%; hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.87; P=0.03) and cataract surgery (2.5% v 1.5%; 1.66, 1.07 to 2.58; P=0.02). Other safety endpoints did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with coronary artery disease, rosuvastatin and atorvastatin showed comparable efficacy for the composite outcome of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularisation at three years. Rosuvastatin was associated with lower LDL cholesterol levels but a higher risk of new onset diabetes mellitus requiring antidiabetics and cataract surgery compared with atorvastatin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02579499.

Randomized, multicenter, parallel, open, phase 4 study to compare the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin/amlodipine polypill versus atorvastatin/amlodipine polypill in hypertension patient with dyslipidemia.

The authors performed this study to investigate the efficacy and safety of a rosuvastatin (RSV)/amlodipine (AML) polypill compared with those of atorvastatin (ATV)/AML polypill. We included 259 patients from 21 institutions in Korea. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: RSV 10 mg/AML 5 mg, RSV 20 mg/AML 5 mg, or ATV 20 mg /AML 5 mg. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of the RSV 10.20 mg/AML 5 mg via percentage changes in LDL-C after 8 weeks of treatment, compared with the ATV 20 mg /AML 5 mg. There was a significant difference in the mean percentage change of LDL-C at 8 weeks between the RSV 10 mg/AML 5 mg and the ATV 20 mg/AML 5 mg (full analysis set [FAS]: -7.08%, 95% CI: -11.79 to -2.38, p = .0034, per-protocol analysis set [PPS]: -6.97%, 95% CI: -11.76 to -2.19, p = .0046). Also, there was a significant difference in the mean percentage change of LDL-C at 8 weeks between the RSV 20 mg/AML 5 mg and the ATV 20 mg/AML 5 mg (FAS: -10.13%, 95% CI: -15.41 to -4.84, p = .0002, PPS: -10.96%, 95% CI: -15.98 to -5.93, p < .0001). There was no significant difference in the adverse events rates between RSV 10 mg/AML 5 mg, RSV 20 mg/AML 5 mg, and ATV 20 mg/AML 5 mg. In conclusion, while maintaining safety, RSV 10 mg/AML 5 mg and the RSV 20 mg/AML 5 mg more effectively reduced LDL-C compared with the ATV 20 mg /AML 5 mg (Clinical trial: NCT03951207).

Real-world pharmacogenetics of statin intolerance: effects of SLCO1B1, ABCG2 , and CYP2C9 variants.

OBJECTIVE: The association of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C with simvastatin-induced muscle toxicity is well characterized. However, different statins are subject to metabolism and transport also by other proteins exhibiting clinically meaningful genetic variation. Our aim was to investigate associations of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C with intolerance to atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin, those of ABCG2 c.421C>A with intolerance to atorvastatin, fluvastatin, or rosuvastatin, and that of CYP2C9*2 and *3 alleles with intolerance to fluvastatin. METHODS: We studied the associations of these variants with statin intolerance in 2042 patients initiating statin therapy by combining genetic data from samples from the Helsinki Biobank to clinical chemistry and statin purchase data. RESULTS: We confirmed the association of SLCO1B1 c.521C/C genotype with simvastatin intolerance both by using phenotype of switching initial statin to another as a marker of statin intolerance [hazard ratio (HR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-3.25, P  = 0.025] and statin switching along with creatine kinase measurement (HR 5.44, 95% CI 1.49-19.9, P  = 0.011). No significant association was observed with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. The sample sizes for fluvastatin and pravastatin were relatively small, but SLCO1B1 c.521T>C carriers had an increased risk of pravastatin intolerance defined by statin switching when compared to homozygous reference T/T genotype (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.01-4.39, P  = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The current results can inform pharmacogenetic statin prescribing guidelines and show feasibility for the methodology to be used in larger future studies.

Impact of atorvastatin reload on the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients on chronic statin therapy: A prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: This trial aimed to assess the efficacy of Atorvastatin reloading on the prevention of Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients pre-treated with this statin and undergoing coronary catheterization. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled study including patients on chronic atorvastatin therapy. We randomly assigned the population to the Atorvastatin Reloading group (AR group), by reloading patients with 80 mg of atorvastatin one day before and three days after the coronary procedure, and the Non-Reloading group (NR group), including patients who received their usual dose without a reloading dose. The primary endpoints were the incidence of cystatin (Cys)-based CIN and Creatinine (Scr)-based CIN. The secondary endpoints consisted of the changes in renal biomarkers (Δ biomarkers) defined as the difference between the follow-up level and the baseline level. RESULTS: Our population was assigned to the AR group (n = 56 patients) and NR group (n = 54 patients). The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. Serum creatinine (SCr)-based CIN occurred in 11.1% in the NR group, and in 8.9% in the AR group without any significant difference. Cys-based CIN occurred in 37% in the NR group and 26.8% in the AR group without any significant difference. The subgroup analysis showed that high dose reloading had significantly reduced the CYC-based CIN risk in patients with type 2 diabetes (43.5% vs 18.8%, RR = 0.43. CI 95% [0.18-0.99])). The comparison of "Δ Cystatin" and Δ eGFR between the AR and NR groups didn't show any significant difference. However, cystatin C had significantly increased between baseline and at 24 hours in the NR group (0.96 vs 1.05, p = 0.001), but not in the AR group (0.94 vs 1.03, p = 0.206). CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not find a benefit of systematic atorvastatin reloading in patients on chronic atorvastatin therapy in preventing CIN. However, it suggested that this strategy could reduce the risk of CyC-based CIN in diabetic type 2 patients.

Atorvastatin Effect on Clopidogrel Efficacy in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Both clopidogrel and atorvastatin metabolism are rooted in hepatic cytochrome p450 activation. There are published reports of atorvastatin interfering with clopidogrel metabolism by inhibiting the activation of clopidogrel. This in turn would decrease the therapeutic effect of clopidogrel potentially resulting in an increase in thrombotic events in patients who are taking both medications. The emergence of viscoelastic assays, such as Thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM), has been utilized to identify prothrombotic states and may provide insight into a patient's microvascular coagulation profile. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to delineate the differences in platelet function between patients on clopidogrel alone versus those on clopidogrel and atorvastatin in patients that are undergoing peripheral revascularization. METHODS: All patients undergoing revascularization between December 2020 and August 2022 were prospectively evaluated. Patients on clopidogrel and atorvastatin were compared to those on clopidogrel alone. Serial perioperative TEG-PM analysis was performed up to 6 months postoperatively and the platelet function in terms of percent inhibition was evaluated in both groups. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-test to identify differences in platelet function. RESULTS: Over the study period, a total of 182 patients were enrolled. Of this cohort 72 patients met study criteria. 87 samples from the 72 patients were analyzed. 31 (43.05%) patients were on clopidogrel alone and 41 (56.94%) were on clopidogrel and atorvastatin. Patients on clopidogrel alone showed significantly greater platelet inhibition compared to those on clopidogrel and atorvastatin [49.01% vs. 34.54%, P = 0.03]. There was no statistical difference in platelet inhibition between groups in terms of aspirin use alone versus aspirin and atorvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on clopidogrel and atorvastatin showed significantly less platelet inhibition compared to those on clopidogrel alone, supporting the concept that atorvastatin may interfere with the therapeutic effect of clopidogrel. Patients taking atorvastatin may require an alternative antiplatelet therapy regimen that does not include clopidogrel to achieve adequate thromboprophylaxis.

[Severe rhabdomyolysis associated with atorvastatin. Case report]. / Rabdomiólisis severa asociada a atorvastatina. Reporte de caso.

Background: Dyslipidemia is a risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis and ischemic heart disease. Statins are safe drugs that are part of the routine treatment in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), however, rhabdomyolysis associated with severe myonecrosis due to statins can occur and associated complications such as acute kidney injury increase mortality. The main objective of this article is to report the case of a critically ill patient with AMI who presented severe statin-associated rhabdomyolysis documented with muscle biopsy. Description of the case: A 54-year-old man who presented with AMI, cardiogenic shock, and cardiorespiratory arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation, fibrinolysis, and successful salvage coronary angiography. However, he presented severe rhabdomyolysis associated with atorvastatin that required suspension of the drug and multi-organ support in a Coronary Care Unit. Conclusions: The prevalence of statin-associated rhabdomyolysis is low, however, the late elevation of CPK above 10 times its upper normal value in those patients with successful percutaneous coronary angiography should promptly draw attention, generate a diagnostic approach towards non-traumatic acquired causes of rhabdomyolysis and assess the suspension of statins.

Introducción: la dislipidemia es un factor de riesgo para el desarrollo de ateroesclerosis y cardiopatía isquémica. Las estatinas son fármacos seguros que forman parte del tratamiento de rutina en el paciente con infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM). Sin embargo, la rabdomiólisis asociada a mionecrosis severa por estatinas puede presentarse y las complicaciones asociadas como la lesión renal aguda incrementan la mortalidad. El objetivo principal de este artículo es reportar el caso de un paciente críticamente enfermo con IAM que presentó rabdomiólisis severa asociada a estatinas documentada con biopsia muscular. Caso clínico: hombre de 54 años que presentó IAM, choque cardiogénico y paro cardiorrespiratorio, que ameritó reanimación cardiopulmonar, fibrinólisis y angiografía coronaria de rescate exitosa. Sin embargo, presentó rabdomiólisis severa asociada a atorvastatina que requirió de suspensión del fármaco y soporte multiorgánico en una unidad de cuidados coronarios. Conclusiones: la prevalencia de la rabdomiólisis asociada a estatinas es baja, sin embargo, la elevación tardía de la CPK por arriba de 10 veces su valor superior normal en aquellos pacientes con angiografía coronaria percutánea exitosa debe llamar la atención, generar un abordaje diagnóstico hacia causas adquiridas no traumáticas de rabdomiólisis y valorar la suspensión de estatinas.

Statins to prevent early cardiac dysfunction in cancer patients at increased cardiotoxicity risk receiving anthracyclines.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anthracyclines can cause cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). We aimed to assess whether statins prevent decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in anthracycline-treated patients at increased risk for CTRCD. METHODS: In this multicenter double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, patients with cancer at increased risk of anthracycline-related CTRCD (per ASCO guidelines) were randomly assigned to atorvastatin 40 mg or placebo once-daily. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed before and within 4 weeks after anthracyclines. Blood biomarkers were measured at every cycle. The primary outcome was post-anthracycline LVEF, adjusted for baseline. CTRCD was defined as a fall in LVEF by >10% to <53%. Secondary endpoints included left ventricular (LV) volumes, CTRCD, CMR tissue characterization, high sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI), and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). RESULTS: We randomized 112 patients (56.9 ± 13.6 years, 87 female, and 73 with breast cancer): 54 to atorvastatin and 58 to placebo. Post-anthracycline CMR was performed 22 (13-27) days from last anthracycline dose. Post-anthracycline LVEF did not differ between the atorvastatin and placebo groups (57.3 ± 5.8% and 55.9 ± 7.4%, respectively) when adjusted for baseline LVEF (P = 0.34). There were no significant between-group differences in post-anthracycline LV end-diastolic (P = 0.20) or end-systolic volume (P = 0.12), CMR myocardial edema and/or fibrosis (P = 0.06-0.47), or peak hsTnI (P ≥ 0.99) and BNP (P = 0.23). CTRCD incidence was similar (4% versus 4%, P ≥ 0.99). There was no difference in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In patients at increased risk of CTRCD, primary prevention with atorvastatin during anthracycline therapy did not ameliorate early LVEF decline, LV remodeling, CTRCD, change in serum cardiac biomarkers, or CMR myocardial tissue changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03186404.

Atorvastatin reduces contrast media-induced pyroptosis of renal tubular epithelial cells by inhibiting the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is the third most common cause of hospital-acquired renal failure. However, there is no effective treatment of CI-AKI, and its mechanism is unknown. Interestingly, atorvastatin has been reported to be effective in renal injury. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the effect and possible molecular mechanism of atorvastatin in CI-AKI. METHODS: On the CI-AKI in vitro model, rat tubular epithelial cells (NRK-52E) were treated with 18 mg I/ml meglumine diatrizoate (MEG) and then pretreated with atorvastatin. pcDNA3.1-TLR4 treatment was performed to overexpress toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in NRK-52E cells. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) kits were used to detect NRK-52E cell viability as well as LDH release in each group, respectively; qRT-PCR to determine mRNA expression of TLR4 in cells; western blot to detect protein expression levels of pyroptosis-related proteins (NLRP3, caspase-1, ASC, and GSDMD) and TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway-related proteins (TLR4, MyD88, NF-κBp65, and p-NF-κB p65) in cells. RESULTS: MEG treatment significantly inhibited the viability of NRK-52E cells, increased pro-inflammatory factor levels and promoted pyroptosis, representing successful establishment of a rat tubular epithelial cell (NRK-52E) CI-AKI in vitro model. Notably, atorvastatin increased the activity of MEG-treated NRK-52E cells and alleviated cell injury in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, atorvastatin significantly down-regulated the expression of TLR4 in MEG-treated NRK-52E cells. However, overexpression of TLR4 inhibited the effects of atorvastatin on increasing cell viability, alleviating cell injury, reducing pro-inflammatory factors (IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α) levels, and inhibiting apoptosis (by down-regulating the expression of NLRP3, caspase-1, ASC, and GSDMD). Furthermore, atorvastatin also inhibited the expression of TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway-related proteins (TLR4, MyD88, and p-NF-κB p65). CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin can attenuate CI-AKI through increasing the activity of MEG-treated renal tubular epithelial cells, relieving cell injury, as well as inhibiting pyroptosis and inflammation. More importantly, the mechanism was achieved by inhibiting the TLR4//MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway.

Atorvastatin ameliorated PM2.5-induced atherosclerosis in rats.

PM2.5 provokes atherosclerotic events. Atorvastatin presents anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities, and may ameliorate PM2.5-induced atherosclerosis development. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cardiotoxic effect of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on atherosclerosis (AS) in rats, and the intervention effects of atorvastatin (ATO) on PM2.5-induced AS development. AS model was established using 32 male Wistar rats through intraperitoneal injection of vitamin D3 combined with a high-fat diet (10% fat and 4% cholesterol). The rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: control group, PM2.5-exposed group, ATO group, and ATO treated PM2.5-exposed group. PM2.5 increased levels of TC, TG, LDL, MDA, IL-6, and TNF-α, as well as decreased SOD levels. Besides, PM2.5 also enhanced AI. After the treatment of ATO, most levels of various contents in serum, including TC, TG, LDL, MDA, IL-6, TNF-α, hS-CRP, and ox-LDL, significantly decreased compared to the PM2.5-exposed group. Moreover, after the treatment of ATO, AI was significantly reduced compared to the PM2.5-exposed group. In addition, PM2.5 exacerbated the nuclear translocation and ATO resulted in an obvious decrease in PM2.5-induced nuclear translocation. The present study suggests that PM2.5 could induce oxidative damage and systemic inflammatory response in atherosclerosis model rats, while ATO could ameliorate PM2.5-induced atherosclerosis development, possibly by lowering lipid, inhibiting inflammation, and suppressing oxidation.

Atorvastatin Metabolite Pattern in Skeletal Muscle and Blood from Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms.

Self-perceived statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are prevalent, but only a minority is drug-dependent. Diagnostic biomarkers are not yet identified. The local statin exposure in skeletal muscle tissue may correlate to the adverse effects. We aimed to determine whether atorvastatin metabolites in blood reflect the corresponding metabolite levels in skeletal muscle, and whether genetic variants of statin transporters modulate this relationship. We also addressed atorvastatin metabolites as potential objective biomarkers of SAMS. Muscle symptoms were examined in patients with coronary disease and self-perceived SAMS during 7 weeks of double-blinded treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg/day and placebo in randomized order. A subset of 12 patients individually identified with more muscle symptoms on atorvastatin than placebo (confirmed SAMS) and 15 patients with no difference in muscle symptom intensity (non-SAMS) attended the present follow-up study. All received 7 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg/day followed by 8 weeks without statins. Biopsies from the quadriceps muscle and blood plasma were collected after each treatment period. Strong correlations (rho > 0.7) between muscle and blood plasma concentrations were found for most atorvastatin metabolites. The impact of the SLCO1B1 c.521T>C (rs4149056) gene variant on atorvastatin's systemic pharmacokinetics was translated into muscle tissue. The SLCO2B1 c.395G>A (rs12422149) variant did not modulate the accumulation of atorvastatin metabolites in muscle tissue. Atorvastatin pharmacokinetics in patients with confirmed SAMS were not different from patients with non-SAMS. In conclusion, atorvastatin metabolite levels in skeletal muscle and plasma are strongly correlated, implying that plasma measurements are suitable proxies of atorvastatin exposure in muscle tissue. The relationship between atorvastatin metabolites in plasma and SAMS deserves further investigation.

Craniocervical Manual Lymphatic Drainage Increases the Efficiency of Atorvastatin-Based Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma.

The objective of this study is to explore whether craniocervical manual lymphatic drainage (cMLD) can promote hematoma absorption and increase the efficiency of atorvastatin-based conservative treatment in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) patients. All CSDH patients treated with atorvastatin-based therapy between October 2020 and February 2022 in our department were retrospectively screened for enrollment. The patients were divided into the control and cMLD groups according to whether cMLD was performed. Head CT or MR images in both groups were obtained before the treatment and 2 weeks and 4 weeks after the treatment. MR images of the deep cervical lymphatic nodes (dCLNs) in 23 patients were obtained in the cMLD group before and approximately 2 weeks after treatment. The volumes of the dCLNs and hematoma were calculated. The primary outcomes are the differences in hematoma volume reduction after 4 weeks of treatment. The secondary outcomes were (1) the differences in hematoma volume reduction between the patients in these two groups in the 2nd week, (2) the dCLN volume change in the cMLD group before and after 2 weeks of treatment, and (3) the percentage of patients who transitioned to surgery because of failure to the conservative treatment. A total of 106 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study for analysis; 54 patients received atorvastatin-based treatment (control group), and 52 were treated with both atorvastatin-based treatment and cMLD (cMLD group). At baseline, the mean hematoma volume was 76.53 ± 42.97 ml in the control group and 88.57 ± 49.01 ml in the cMLD group (p = 0.181). In the 4th week, the absolute number of hematoma reductions (20.79 ± 34.73 ml vs. 37.28 ± 28.24 ml, p = 0.009) and percentage of hematoma reductions (22.58% ± 60.01% vs. 46.43% ± 30.12%, p = 0.012) in the cMLD group were greater than those in the control group. After 2 weeks of treatment, the absolute number of hematoma reductions showed no difference in the two groups, while the percentage of hematoma reduction was higher in the cMLD group (18.18% ± 24.61% vs. 2.08% ± 25.72%, p = 0.001). One patient in cMLD and 8 patients in the control group were transitioned to receive surgical treatment. The dCLN volumes in 23 experimental patients increased significantly after 2 weeks of treatment in the cMLD group (p = 0.032). There were no severe side effects that needed to be reported. Combined with atorvastatin-based therapy, cMLD can promote hematoma absorption and decrease the surgery rate, which provides a new therapeutic strategy for CSDH.

Rationale and design of COLchicine On-admission to Reduce inflammation in Acute Coronary Syndrome (COLOR-ACS) study.

AIMS: The aim of the colchicine on-admission to reduce inflammation in acute coronary syndrome (COLOR-ACS) study is to evaluate the effects of the addition of short-term, low-dose colchicine to high-dose atorvastatin in limiting levels of inflammatory markers, such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). METHODS: The COLOR-ACS study is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, two-arm trial. Statin-naive patients with NSTE-ACS, scheduled for an early invasive strategy, are randomized on admission to receive standard treatment of atorvastatin 80 mg or standard treatment plus colchicine (1 mg loading dose followed by 0.5 mg/day until discharge). The main exclusion criteria are prior statin and/or colchicine treatment, current treatment with potent inhibitors of CYP3A4, P-glycoprotein or immunosuppressive drugs, known active malignancy, severe kidney, cardiac, liver disease. There is clinical and biochemical follow-up at 30 days after discharge and telephone interview at 6 months. The primary end point is the change in hs-CRP from admission to discharge. Secondary end points include: incidence of acute kidney injury; MB fraction of creatine kinase peak value; glomerular filtration rate change from baseline to 30 days; persistence of hs-CRP ≥2 mg/dl at 30 days; adverse clinical events within 30 days; tolerance to colchicine. CONCLUSION: The COLOR-ACS study will provide evidence on the efficacy of early short-term treatment with colchicine in addition to high-dose atorvastatin compared to atorvastatin alone in ACS patients. The potential anti-inflammatory action of colchicine plus atorvastatin is expected to limit hs-CRP increase with resultant clinical benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT05250596.

Polypill Strategy in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention.

BACKGROUND: A polypill that includes key medications associated with improved outcomes (aspirin, angiotensin-converting-enzyme [ACE] inhibitor, and statin) has been proposed as a simple approach to the secondary prevention of cardiovascular death and complications after myocardial infarction. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we assigned patients with myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months to a polypill-based strategy or usual care. The polypill treatment consisted of aspirin (100 mg), ramipril (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), and atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg). The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization. The key secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, or nonfatal ischemic stroke. RESULTS: A total of 2499 patients underwent randomization and were followed for a median of 36 months. A primary-outcome event occurred in 118 of 1237 patients (9.5%) in the polypill group and in 156 of 1229 (12.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 0.96; P = 0.02). A key secondary-outcome event occurred in 101 patients (8.2%) in the polypill group and in 144 (11.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.90; P = 0.005). The results were consistent across prespecified subgroups. Medication adherence as reported by the patients was higher in the polypill group than in the usual-care group. Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a polypill containing aspirin, ramipril, and atorvastatin within 6 months after myocardial infarction resulted in a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events than usual care. (Funded by the European Union Horizon 2020; SECURE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02596126; EudraCT number, 2015-002868-17.).