RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of a large Medicare fee reduction for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on its use in prostate and breast cancer patients. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: SEER-Medicare. STUDY DESIGN: We compared trends in the use of IMRT between patients treated in practices directly affected by fee reductions (for prostate cancer, men treated in urology practices that own IMRT equipment; for breast cancer, women treated in freestanding radiotherapy clinics) and patients treated in other types of practices. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We identified breast and prostate cancer patients receiving IMRT using outpatient and physician office claims. We classified urology practices based on whether they billed for IMRT and radiotherapy clinics based on whether they were reimbursed under the Physician Fee Schedule. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Between 2006 and 2015 the payment for IMRT delivered in freestanding clinics and physician offices declined by $367 (-54.7%). However, the use of IMRT increased in physician practices subject to payment cuts, both in absolute terms and relative to use in practices unaffected by the payment cut. Use of IMRT in prostate cancer patients treated at urology practices that own IMRT equipment increased by 9.1 (95% CI: 2.0-16.2) percentage points between 2005 and 2016 relative to use in patients treated at other urology practices. Use of IMRT in breast cancer patients treated at freestanding radiotherapy centers increased by 7.5 (95% CI: -5.1 to 20.1) percentage points relative to use in patients treated at hospital-based centers. CONCLUSIONS: A steep decline in IMRT fees did not decrease IMRT use over the period from 2006 to 2015, though use has declined since 2010.
Assuntos
Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços/economia , Medicare/economia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorreferência Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Estados UnidosRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Significant controversy exists regarding whether physicians factor personal financial considerations into their clinical decision making. Within oncology, several reimbursement policies may incentivize physicians to increase health care use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the financial incentives presented by oncology reimbursement policies affect physician practice patterns. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Studies evaluating an association between reimbursement incentives and changes in reimbursement policy on oncology care delivery were reviewed. Articles were identified systematically by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Proquest Health Management, Econlit, and Business Source Premier. English-language articles focused on the US health care system that made empirical estimates of the association between a measurement of physician reimbursement/compensation and a measurement of delivery of cancer treatment services were included. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool was used to assess risk of bias. There were no date restrictions on the publications, and literature searches were finalized on February 14, 2018. FINDINGS: Eighteen studies were included. All were observational cohort studies, and most had a moderate risk of bias. Heterogeneity of reimbursement policies and outcomes precluded meta-analysis; therefore, a qualitative synthesis was performed. Most studies (15 of 18 [83%]) reported an association between reimbursement and care delivery consistent with physician responsiveness to financial incentives, although such an association was not identified in all studies. Findings consistently suggested that self-referral arrangements may increase use of radiotherapy and that profitability of systemic anticancer agents may affect physicians' choice of drug. Findings were less conclusive as to whether profitability of systemic anticancer therapy affects the decision of whether to use any systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: To date, this study is the first systematic review of reimbursement policy and clinical care delivery in oncology. The findings suggest that some oncologists may, in certain circumstances, alter treatment recommendations based on personal revenue considerations. An implication of this finding is that value-based reimbursement policies may be a useful tool to better align physician incentives with patient need and increase the value of oncology care.
Assuntos
Oncologistas , Padrões de Prática Médica , Reembolso de Incentivo , Humanos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Autorreferência MédicaRESUMO
Ethical issues arise when a professional endeavor such as medicine, which seeks to place the well-being of others over the self-interest of the practitioner, meets granular business and legal decisions involved in making a livelihood out of a professional calling. The use of restrictive covenants, involvement in self-referral patterns, and maintaining appropriate comity among physicians while engaged in the marketplace are common challenges in radiation oncology practice. A paradigm of analysis is presented to help navigate these management challenges.
Assuntos
Ética nos Negócios , Relações Interprofissionais/ética , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/ética , Humanos , Autorreferência Médica/ética , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
Since doctors disposed of effective tools to serve their patients, they had to worry about the proper management of available resources and how to deal with the relationship with the industry that provides such resources. In this relationship, health professionals may be involved in conflicts of interest that they need to acknowledge and learn how to handle. This article discusses the conflicts of interest in nephrology. Its objectives are to identify those areas where such conflicts could occur; to help to solve them, always considering the best interest of patients; and to help health workers to keep in mind that they have to preserve their autonomy and professional integrity. Conflicts of interest of professionals in the renal area and related scientific societies, with the industry producing equipment, supplies and drugs are reviewed. Dichotomy, payment for referral, self-referral of patients and incentives for cost control are analyzed. Finally, recommendations to help preserve a good practice in nephrology are made.
Assuntos
Humanos , Prática Profissional/ética , Conflito de Interesses , Unidades Hospitalares de Hemodiálise/ética , Relações Interprofissionais/ética , Nefrologia/ética , Médicos/ética , Sociedades Médicas/ética , Autonomia Profissional , Autorreferência Médica/ética , Unidades Hospitalares de Hemodiálise/economia , IndústriasRESUMO
Aim: To determine how one dental education session and referral of study participants aged 8-11 years would affect utilization of oral-health care services. Methods: This descriptive prospective study recruited 1,406 pupils aged 8-11 years from randomly selected primary schools in Enugu metropolis. All pupils received one oral-health education and referral letters for treatment. Data were collected on the pupils' socio-demographic profile, family structure, and history of oral-health care utilization in the 12 months preceding the study and within 12 months of receipt of referral letter. The effect of these factors as predictors of past and recent dental service utilization was determined using logistic regression. Results: Only 4.3% of the study participants had ever used oral-health services in the 12 months prior to the study. Within 12 months of issuing the referral letters, 9.0% of pupils used the oral-health services. Children from middle (AOR: 0.46; CI: 0.29-0.73; p=0.001) and low socioeconomic strata (AOR: 0.21; CI: 0.11-0.39; p<0.001) and those living with relatives/guardians (AOR: 0.08, CI: 0.01-0.56; p=0.01) were still less likely to have utilized oral-health services. Conclusions: Referral of children for oral-health care increased the number of children who utilized oral health care services (Au)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Assistência Odontológica para Crianças/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Bucal/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos de Saúde Bucal/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação em Saúde Bucal , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Autorreferência Médica , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Assistência Odontológica/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Bucal , Odontologia PreventivaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether a self-referred population screened by an interventional radiology (IR) clinic and a non-IR, physician-referred population differed with regard to suitability for uterine artery embolization (UAE) for symptomatic leiomyomas on the basis of preprocedure MRI. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study of 301 women evaluated in an IR clinic for possible UAE from January 2009 to September 2012. Subjects were retrospectively divided into two groups: self-referred via direct marketing (group A, n = 203; mean age, 41.8 years; range, 22-58 years) and physician referred (group B, n = 98; mean age, 42.9 years; range, 30-65 years). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups in presenting symptoms (multiple symptoms, bleeding, bulk-related symptoms, pain). After initial screening, 73.4% of group A (149 of 203) and 79.6% of group B (78 of 98) underwent MRI (P = .242). On the basis of MRI findings, 91.3% of group A (136 of 149) and 94.9% of group B (74 of 78) had uterine leiomyomas (P = .328). Adenomyosis without leiomyoma was present in 4.0% of group A (6 of 149) and 3.8% of group B (3 of 78) (P = .947). Incidental findings requiring further clinical or imaging evaluation were found in 20.8% of group A (31 of 149) and 24.4% of group B (19 of 78) (P = .539). After MRI, 41.6% of group A (62 of 149) and 48.7% of group B (38 of 78) proceeded to UAE (P = .306). CONCLUSIONS: After initial screening, similar proportions of self-referred and physician-referred patients were candidates for UAE. The rates of confirmed leiomyomas and incidental findings on MRI were similar between groups.
Assuntos
Leiomioma/epidemiologia , Leiomioma/terapia , Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorreferência Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Embolização da Artéria Uterina/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Marketing de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Pelve/patologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagem , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de SaúdeRESUMO
PURPOSE: While physician self-referral has been associated with increased health care use, the downstream effects of the practice remain poorly characterized. Accordingly we identified the relationship between urologist self-referral and downstream health care use in patients with urinary stone disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With urologist self-referral status as the exposure of interest, we performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries from 2008 to 2010 to evaluate the relationship between self-referral and imaging intensity, risk of surgical treatment and time to surgical treatment for urinary stone disease. RESULTS: We identified dose dependent increases in computerized tomography use with increasing stratum of urologist self-referral. Compared to nonself-referring urologists, computerized tomography use was 1.19 times higher (95% CI 1.07-1.34) in episodes ascribed to intermediate frequency (5 to 9) and 1.32 times higher (95% CI 1.16-1.50) in episodes ascribed to high frequency (10+) self-referring urologists. Self-referral was inversely associated with risk of surgical treatment for stone disease. Specifically, patients treated by intermediate and high frequency self-referring urologists were less likely to undergo surgical treatment than those treated by nonself-referring urologists, with HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-0.99) and HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.66-0.99), respectively. We identified no statistically significant between-group differences in time to surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Self-referral is associated with increased use of computerized tomography and with decreased use of surgery for stone disease. While policy efforts to further restrict physician self-referral may reduce the use of computerized tomography, they may also result in unintended consequences with respect to patterns of surgical care.
Assuntos
Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorreferência Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Cálculos Urinários , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Medicare , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Cálculos Urinários/diagnóstico por imagem , Cálculos Urinários/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Self-referred visits account for an average of 30% of all Emergency Department (ED) visits in the Netherlands. Some of these are considered inappropriate, because patients receive care that a GP can provide. Worldwide, studies have used various methods to determine the proportion of inappropriate visits by self-referred patients, resulting in diverging percentages. The aim of this study was to find a reliable percentage of appropriate visits to the ED by self-referred patients in the Netherlands. METHODS: This observational, prospective study was performed in the ED of a hospital in the Netherlands. Data were collected on all self-referred patients in four separate months over 1 year. The appropriateness of an ED visit was determined at two time points: first, after primary assessment of the patient, using predefined criteria, and second the moment the patient left the ED, on the basis of the diagnosis and treatment received. Finally, the perspective of the patients was taken into account using a questionnaire. RESULTS: In 4 months 3196 self-referred patients were included. In all, 1862 (58.8%) visits were classified as appropriate according to the predefined criteria. When the second time point was taken into consideration, 48.1% of the patients had a secondary care diagnosis and/or needed secondary care treatment, classifying their visits as appropriate. According to the opinion of the patients 76.7% classified their visit as appropriate. CONCLUSION: The percentage of appropriate ED visits by self-referred patients in the Netherlands ranges from 48.1 to 58.8%, as determined using two different methods.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorreferência Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
La enfermedad de pie-mano-boca es un exantema frecuente en la niñez. Se han descrito varios tipos de lesiones de distribución generalizada en casos atípicos, aunque los datos sobre la predilección respecto de la localización de estas lesiones son insuficientes. Nuestro objetivo fue describir las características demográficas de los pacientes con esta enfermedad y caracterizar las localizaciones de las lesiones en pacientes con erupciones atípicas, tratadas en un centro ambulatorio de dermatología de un hospital pediátrico, entre noviembre de 2011 y agosto de 2013. Se incluyen a 67 pacientes en el estudio. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 34 meses con predominio de varones (60%). Todos los pacientes tuvieron erupciones en la boca, las manos y los pies. Los niños <24 meses se vieron afectados en la zona cubierta por el pañal y las extremidades, con un compromiso significativamente mayor en los que tenían entre 24 y 48 meses y en los >48 meses (p <0,0001 y p= 0,011, respectivamente). Ninguno de los pacientes tuvo complicaciones sistémicas graves.
Hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) is a common childhood exanthem. Various types of lesions and widespread distribution in atypical cases have been described, but data on the predilection of lesion localizations in atypical cases are insufficient. We aimed to describe the demographic features of patients with HFMD, and to characterize lesion localizations in patients with atypical eruptions treated at an outpatient dermatology clinic of a pediatric hospital, between November 2011 and August 2013.The study included 67 patients. Mean age of the patients was 34 months and there was a male predominance (60%). All the patients had eruptions on hands, feet, and mouth. Children aged <24 months had involvement of the diaper area and extremities, which was significantly higher than those aged 24-48 months and >48 months (P < 0.0001 and P= 0.011, respectively). None of the patients had serious systemic complications.
Assuntos
Humanos , Fraude/legislação & jurisprudência , Georgia , Órgãos Governamentais , Responsabilidade Legal , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Autorreferência Médica/legislação & jurisprudência , Salários e Benefícios , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Wide variation exists in the detection rate of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) with elective coronary angiography for suspected stable ischemic heart disease. We sought to understand the incremental impact of nonclinical factors on this variation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included all patients who underwent coronary angiography for possible suspected stable ischemic heart disease, from October 1, 2008, to September 30, 2011, in Ontario, Canada. Nonclinical factors of interest included physician self-referral for angiography, the physician type (invasive or interventional), and hospital type. Hospitals were categorized into diagnostic angiogram only centers, stand-alone percutaneous coronary intervention centers, or full service centers with coronary artery bypass surgery available. Multivariable hierarchical logistic models were developed to identify system and physician-level predictors of obstructive CAD, after adjustment for patient factors. Our cohort consisted of 60 986 patients, of whom 31 726 had obstructive CAD (52.0%), with significant range across hospitals from 37.3% to 69.2%. Fewer self-referral patients (49.8%) had obstructive CAD compared with nonself-referral patients (53.5%), with an odds ratio of 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.93; P<0.001). Angiograms performed by invasive physicians had a lower likelihood of obstructive CAD compared with those by interventional physicians (48.2% versus 56.9%; odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.90; P<0.001). Fewer angiograms at diagnostic only centers showed obstructive CAD (42.0%) compared with full service centers (55.1%; odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.98; P=0.04). Nonclinical factors accounted for 23.8% of the variation between hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Physician and system factors are important predictors of obstructive CAD with coronary angiography.
Assuntos
Arteriopatias Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Vasos Coronários/patologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Autorreferência Médica , Idoso , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/complicações , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/epidemiologia , Canadá , Estudos de Coortes , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Atenção à Saúde , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicações , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiografia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to categorize patients referred to a specialized thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) practice to determine the diagnostic accuracy of those who are physician and self-referred. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data on all patients who were referred for TOS between 2006 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained institutional review board-approved database and patient records. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, 621 patients were referred for TOS (433 women and 188 men; mean age 39 years [range 10-87]). Five hundred seventy-one patients (92%) were diagnosed with TOS, with 421 (74%) neurogenic, 126 (22%) venous, and 24 (4%) arterial TOS cases. Of the 525 physician referrals, 478 (91%) had TOS, and of the 93 self-referrals, 90 (97%) had TOS. The 421 patients with neurogenic TOS (NTOS, 304 women and 117 men) had symptoms on average for 56 months (range 1-516). Two hundred seventy-one patients (64%) were initially treated with TOS-specific physical therapy (PT), and 100 (37%) improved. One hundred seventy-eight patients (42%) underwent a lidocaine block, and 145 patients (81%) had a positive block. Seventy-four patients (18%) underwent Botox injections 44 (60%) of which were positive and the average number of Botox injections was 1.3. One hundred forty patients (33%) underwent transaxillary first rib resection and scalenectomy (FRRS), and 128 patients (91%) improved. Of patients undergoing FRRS, 92 (66%) had a lidocaine block, 82 (89%) of which were positive. Of patients with a positive lidocaine block, 74 (90%) improved after FRRS. Of patients undergoing FRRS, 31 (22%) underwent Botox injections, 15 (48%) of which were positive. Of patients with a positive Botox block, 14 (93%) improved after FRRS. Average length of time between initial visit and operation was 6.4 months (range 2 weeks to 34 months), and average follow-up time was 13 months (range 1 week to 49 months). CONCLUSIONS: 1) Both referring physicians and patients are very accurate in their preliminary diagnosis of TOS (neurogenic, venous, or arterial TOS). 2) In a specialized TOS practice, two-thirds of patients are sent to TOS-specific PT and one-third improve from this treatment alone. 3) One-third of patients referred for NTOS eventually undergo FRRS with a 91% success rate.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Autorreferência Médica , Síndrome do Desfiladeiro Torácico/diagnóstico , Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Some urology groups have integrated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), a radiation treatment with a high reimbursement rate, into their practice. This is permitted by the exception for in-office ancillary services in the federal prohibition against self-referral. I examined the association between ownership of IMRT services and use of IMRT to treat prostate cancer. METHODS: Using Medicare claims from 2005 through 2010, I constructed two samples: one comprising 35 self-referring urology groups in private practice and a matched control group comprising 35 non-self-referring urology groups in private practice, and the other comprising non-self-referring urologists employed at 11 National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers matched with 11 self-referring urology groups in private practice. I compared the use of IMRT in the periods before and during ownership and used a difference-in-differences analysis to evaluate changes in IMRT use according to self-referral status. RESULTS: The rate of IMRT use by self-referring urologists in private practice increased from 13.1 to 32.3%, an increase of 19.2 percentage points (P<0.001). Among non-self-referring urologists, the rate of IMRT use increased from 14.3 to 15.6%, an increase of 1.3 percentage points (P=0.05). The unadjusted difference-in-differences effect was 17.9 percentage points (P<0.001). The regression-adjusted increase in IMRT use associated with self-referral was 16.4 percentage points (P<0.001). The rate of IMRT use by urologists working at National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers remained stable at 8.0% but increased by 33.0 percentage points among the 11 matched self-referring urology groups. The regression-adjusted difference-in-differences effect was 29.3 percentage points (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Urologists who acquired ownership of IMRT services increased their use of IMRT substantially more than urologists who did not own such services. Allowing urologists to self-refer for IMRT may contribute to increased use of this expensive therapy. (Funded by the American Society for Radiation Oncology.).