Microbiological screening of corneas stored in organ culture medium at Lions Eye Bank of Western Australia from 2011 to 2022.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyse the contamination rate of corneal samples stored in OCM at Lions Eye Bank of Western Australia over a 12-year period. METHODS: All OCM samples used to preserve corneas from 2011 to 2022 (inclusive) underwent microbiological testing. Samples were collected into aerobic and anaerobic culture bottles on day 3-5 of corneal preservation and 24 h after transfer to thinning medium. Samples were tested for 7 days using the BACTEC FX system. Corneas remained in quarantine until clearance was obtained. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2022, 3009 corneas were retrieved and 2756 corneas were stored in OCM. Thirty one (1.1%) positive samples were reported, with 20 growths of bacterial origin and 11 fungal. Microbial contamination was mostly identified on day 1 of culture (77.5%). Donors of contaminated samples had a mean age of 55 years, with 17 male and 14 female donors. The highest incidence of contamination came from donors whose cause of death was cancer. Death to enucleation times of contaminated samples ranged from 3.5 to 25.5 h (mean = 13.5 ± 7.3) and death to preservation time ranged from 4.1 to 27.5 h (mean = 14.8 ± 7.2). These did not significantly differ from the average time from death to enucleation (mean = 13.9 ± 3) and death to preservation (mean = 16.3 ± 4.2) of non-contaminated samples. CONCLUSION: Microbiological screening of corneas stored in OCM at LEBWA showed a very low rate of positive cultures with no predictive donor characteristics.

National Consensus on Contraindications for Corneal Donation for Transplantation in Switzerland.

PURPOSE: To establish a national consensus on contraindications for corneal donation for transplantation in Switzerland. METHODS: Swisstransplant (SWT), the Swiss national foundation coordinating tissue and organ donations, convened a working group consisting of six national corneal surgeons and eye bankers and donation experts to create a contraindication list for corneal donation. The group reviewed available national and international guidelines and recommendations, while adhering to Swiss law and transplant regulations. In cases of opposing opinions, the group held follow-up meetings until a consensus was reached. A consensus was defined as agreement among all parties present. RESULTS: From March 2021 to November 2021, the study group held six meetings and created a standardized minimal contraindication list for corneal donation in Switzerland. Thanks to this list, SWT has created a mandatory working and documentation file for donor coordinators to use when evaluating multiorgan donors for corneal harvesting. The authors agreed that while the national consensus list provides standardized minimal contraindication criteria, local eye banks may choose to introduce additional, more rigorous criteria. CONCLUSION: Given that corneal transplantation is the most commonly performed transplantation, establishing a consensus on contraindications is crucial for recipient safety. The creation of a consensus on contraindications for corneal donation in Switzerland is an essential contribution to fulfil the legal requirements concerning quality assurance and provides sufficient high-quality donor tissue within the country. Therefore, periodic review and revision of the consensus is considered critical.

Performance outcomes from a DMEK peeling and preparation wet lab.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation performance of trainee surgeons in an ex vivo human donor cornea DMEK wet lab simulation setting. METHODS: Human donor corneoscleral rims unsuitable for transplantation were obtained from Moorfields Lions Eye Bank. At the wet lab, graft stripping was performed by scoring the peripheral endothelium. The trypan blue positive cells (TBPC) and cell density (cells/mm2-reticule count) were counted manually before and after stripping. The procedural time, peripheral and central tears and complete peel-off were also recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Eight trainee surgeons attended the wet lab each attempting three DMEKs. Between the first and last attempts a significant decrease was seen in the procedural time (17.6 min vs 10.6 min (p<0.05)) and the TBPC % (12.9% vs 3.8% (p<0.05)). The percentage of tears peripherally and centrally also reduced between the first and the last trials (50% vs 13% (p=0.2226) and 38% vs 0% (p=0.1327)). A significant correlation was found between longer peeling times and higher TBPC % (p<0.001) with a 0.7% endothelial mortality increase for each additional minute required to complete the peel. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK wet labs provide a controlled risk-free learning opportunity for trainee surgeons to improve confidence and competence. Wet labs improve the success rate of DMEK graft preparation as well as flatten the learning curve. This emphasises the importance of continued support for the expansion of this valuable learning resource, promoting wider uptake of DMEK surgery.

[Attach importance to the orderly development of different corneal transplant procedures].

There are various surgical methods for corneal transplantation, each requiring precise treatment tailored to the characteristics and different layers of corneal opacity or lesions. These layers include the corneal epithelium, stroma (lamellar), and corneal endothelium, with options for full-thickness (penetrating) corneal transplantation or artificial corneal transplantation. However, a current issue in clinical practice is that, regardless of the degree of corneal disease, the availability of corresponding eye bank support, or surgical conditions, classic penetrating (full-thickness) corneal transplantation is universally performed. Alternatively, there is a trend toward adopting technically demanding procedures such as endothelial transplantation and artificial corneal transplantation. This trend has led to increased postoperative complications and the wastage of corneal donor materials. Choosing the appropriate corneal transplant procedure can offer advantages such as preserving more healthy corneal tissue, conserving corneal donors, facilitating rapid vision recovery, and minimizing the risk of immune rejection. Corneologists need to master the indications for various corneal transplant surgeries and systematically perform different corneal transplant procedures based on the surgeon's skills, hospital conditions, and eye bank conditions. This approach aims to enhance the success rate of the surgery.

Principais motivos de descarte de córneas para transplante na Paraíba: por que o anti-HBc merece atenção?* / Main reasons for discarding corneas for transplant in Paraíba: why does anti-HBc deserve attention?*

RESUMO Objetivo: Identificar o perfil dos doadores de tecidos oculares humanos na área de atuação do Banco de Olhos da Paraíba, destacando o impacto da sorologia positiva para hepatite B no descarte dos tecidos para transplante. Métodos: O estudo é transversal e utilizou dados do Banco de Olhos da Paraíba entre janeiro de 2013 e dezembro de 2022. Dados sobre procedência, idade, sexo, causa do óbito, tempo entre óbito e enucleação, resultados sorológicos e motivo de descarte das córneas dos doadores foram coletados. Resultados: O maior motivo de descarte foi por sorologia positiva (56,5%), sendo positivadas as sorologias positivas para hepatite B e HBsAg em 11,1% e 4,75% dos pacientes, respectivamente. Conclusão: A sorologia positiva para hepatite B como um critério de descarte absoluto é responsável por grande parcela de descartes, apesar da pouca informação sobre suas repercussões e representação de infectividade nos receptores do transplante.

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the profile of human ocular tissue donors in the area covered by the Eye Bank of Paraíba (PB), highlighting the impact of positive serology for hepatitis B (anti-HBc) in the disposal of tissues for transplantation. Methods: This is a cross-sectional that uses data from the Eye Bank of Paraíba (PB) between January 2013 and December 2022. Data on origin, age, sex, cause of death, time between death and enucleation, serological results, and reason for discarded donor corneas were collected. Results: The main reason for discarding was due to positive serology (56.5%), with positive anti-HBc and HBsAg serology in 11.1% and 4.75% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: Anti-HBc positive serology as an absolute disposal criterion is responsible for great part of disposals, despite little information about its repercussions and representation of infectivity in transplant recipients.

[Analysis of factors affecting the quality of donor corneal endothelial cells].

Objective: To explore the factors influencing the quality of donor corneal endothelium. Methods: A retrospective case series study was conducted. Data from 568 donor corneas obtained from the Shandong Eye Bank between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, were collected for analysis. The corneal endothelium of the donor corneas was observed using corneal endothelial microscopy to assess corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation, and hexagonal cell ratio (HEX). Relevant factors of corneal donors were collected, including gender, age, cause of death, season of death, time from death to corneal retrieval, and methods of corpse preservation, to investigate their impact on the quality of donor corneal endothelium. The age factor was divided into five age groups: 0-20 years, 21-40 years, 41-60 years, 61-80 years, and >80 years. The time of corneal retrieval was divided into three periods based on the time elapsed since the donor's death: <6 hours, 6-12 hours, and >12 hours. The relationship between these factors and corneal endothelial conditions was analyzed. Results: The 568 donor corneas were obtained from 288 donors, including 225 males (78.13%) and 63 females (21.87%). The mean age was 51.77±18.48 years. The causes of death among donors were as follows: cardiovascular diseases 54.58% (275 individuals), cancer 17.96% (74 individuals), organ failure 14.26% (49 individuals), and accidents 13.20% (64 individuals). The mean time of corneal retrieval after donor death was 140 (76, 400) minutes (ranging from 30 minutes to 45 hours). Among the 145 corneas (25.53%) that had their initial corneal endothelial microscopy examination, the images were not clear, and after thorough rewarming, 106 corneas (18.7%) still had unclear images and could not be analyzed. Among the 462 corneas (81.3%) with clear images, the ECD was (2 602.23±318.40) cells/mm², the coefficient of variation was 36.61%±4.81%, and the HEX was 52.73%±7.15%. The ECD of corneas from older donors was lower compared to younger donors, and the differences between age groups were statistically significant (P<0.001). Corneas from donors who died due to accidents had a higher ECD [(2 829.88±313.90) cells/mm²] compared to those who died from cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and organ failure, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). The ECD was highest when corneas were retrieved within 6 hours after death, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Older donors had higher coefficients of variation but lower HEX values (both P<0.05). Corneas retrieved after a longer time from death had higher coefficients of variation, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in HEX (P>0.05). Organ failure, cryopreservation, and corneal retrieval time >12 hours were risk factors for unclear corneal endothelial imaging (all P<0.001). Among the 136 corneal endothelial images (23.94%), circular, oval, or band-shaped dark areas were observed, and corneas with dark areas had lower ECD (P<0.05). The longer the time elapsed from death to corneal retrieval, the more dark areas were observed (P<0.001). The presence of dark areas did not affect the coefficient of variation and HEX (P>0.05). Conclusion: Advanced donor age, death due to chronic diseases, longer time elapsed from death to corneal retrieval, and cryopreservation of the body lead to a decrease in the quality of donor corneal endothelium.

P17-A140†Clinical outcomes of the first organ-cultured preloaded DMEK-a single centre studie.

The use of ready-to-use grafts from specialized eye banks might provide a number of benefits, including graft quality control, assured availability at a certain operation time, a decreased likelihood of case cancellation, and a shorter and less sophisticated DMEK surgery, with a resulting lower risk of graft damage. However, it is critical to thoroughly establish the clinical safety of employing these preloaded tissues. Especially since most of the studies were prepared and stored under hypothermic conditions. There are only a few studies on preprepared tissues in organ culture, which are partly controversial.In this prospective study we included patients who received DMEK surgery at the Knappschaft Eye Clinic Sulzbach. Patients received either a preloaded DMEK (pDMEK), prepared five days before surgery in the eye bank, or a conventional, directly before surgery, surgeon-prepared DMEK (sDMEK).The preliminary data show a trend towards more frequent need for rebubbing in the pDMEK group and a statistically non-significant lower postoperative endothelial cell count compared to the sDMEK group. However, the development of visual acuity and decrease in corneal thickness is comparable in both groups.Therefore, we investigated the clinical outcomes of the first organ-cultured preloaded DMEK cases and compared these outcomes with those from our very last cases with surgically loaded tissues from a single centre.

P44-A104†Logistics and results with precut and preloaded graft for DMEK.

PURPOSE: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation is technically demanding and is a limiting factor for uptake of this kind of surgery. Supply methods that simplify the procedure for surgeons are key to increasing uptake. In this talk logistics and outcomes of Eye bank prepared DMEK tissue will be presented. METHODS: Laboratory studies of two different shipping protocols for DMEK (endothelium trifolded inwards and endothelium rolled outwards) will be presented. Clinical outcomes and complications of patients underwent to DMEK surgery with Eye bank prepared or surgeon prepared tissue will be presented. A Cost analysis of eye bank versus surgeon prepared endothelial grafts will be also part of the presentation. RESULTS: There was no difference in endothelial cell viability between surgeon or eye bank prepared tissue. Surgeon-stripped DMEK grafts in the laboratory investigation showed significantly higher elastic modulus and adhesion force compared to prestripped and preloaded tissues (p<0.0001). In the clinical data, rebubbling rates of 48%, 40% and 15% were observed in preloaded, prestripped and surgeon-stripped DMEK grafts, respectively. The cost analysis showed that eye bank prepared tissues had higher surgical expenses compared to those prepared by the surgeon, while the post-operative care expenses were similar between the two groups CONCLUSION: The Eye bank prepared tissues are a valid alternative to Surgeon prepared tissue, however need to be highlighted that with current method there is a decreased adhesion forces and elastic modulus in eye bank prepared tissues that may contribute to increased rebubbling rates.

P37-A124†Smile bank - corneal stromal lenticules from relex smile - the new eye bank product.

PURPOSE: The aim of our presentation is to introduce future eye bank product - corneal stromal lenticule from living donors, which can be used for allotransplantation. METHODS: ReLEx (refractive lenticule extraction) SMILE (small incision lenticule extraction) is a common approach in laser eye surgery. It is minimally invasive and flap-free procedure. During this procedure part of corneal stroma (lenticule) is created by femtosecond laser and consequently removed through small incision. The lenticule is basically waste material of the ReLEx SMILE procedure. In the International Eye Bank of Prague, we decided to establish new protocol for lenticule withdrawal, storage and release for transplantation. RESULTS: All donors signed an informed consent, and their serum was tested for the presence of infectious diseases. After ReLEx SMILE procedure the lenticule was stored in container with cryopreservation solution and frozen in the eye bank using the same protocol for frozen amniotic membrane. After 6 months in -80°C tissues were defrosted and examined histologically, using conventional light histology staining and electron microscopy. CONCLUSION: We believe, that lenticule from living donor is a safe and effective tissue, that can be used for many indications and in particular situations represents good alternative to whole donor cornea and amniotic membrane.

P01-A120†Pre-dissected dmek stored in an active storage machine: feasibility study.

PURPOSE: The number of endothelial grafts precut by eye banks increases. Their shelf life is limited to a few days. We previously demonstrated the superiority of an active storage machine (ASM) over organ culture (passive) for whole corneas. AIMS: To measure the endothelial viability of pre-dissected DMEK after 3 and 10 days of storage in our ASM in a preclinical study. METHODS: Pairs of human corneas were included. The endothelial cell density (ECD in cells/mm2), thickness and transparency of corneas were measured before graft preparation. Descemet's membrane (DM) was peeled using the no-touch technique leaving the graft attached to the center of the cornea (on approx. 1mm2). After randomization, one cornea was kept in organ culture (OC) and the other in the ASM (21 mmHg, 2.6 µL/min) in the same medium (CorneaMax, Eurobio). The final viable ECD was determined using the triple staining with Hoechst-Ethidium-Calcein-AM. In addition, the expression of CD166 and NCAM (lateral membranes), ZO-1 (apical junctions), Na+/K+ ATPase (endothelial pump function) and COX-IV (mitochondrial content) was studied by immunostaining to characterize endothelial cells after the storage. RESULTS: Initial ECDs were comparable: 2185±232 cells/mm2 in the ASM versus 2276±328 in OC for the 3-day period and 2680±416 cells/mm2 in the ASM versus 2644±420 in OC for the 10-day period. The DMs did not fold back in either BR or OC. The viable ECD did not differ significantly between the ASM and OC for either storage period: 2378±501 (ASM) versus 2342±503 (OC) for the 3-day period (n=8 pairs and p=0.624) and 2482±288 (ASM) versus 2579±315 (OC) for the 10-day period (n=5 pairs and p=0.176). Corneas were more transparent and thinner in the ASM than in OC after 3 days (916±86 versus 1193±136µm, p=0.0001) and 10 days (957±128 versus 1220±105µm, p=0.0625). The functional and structural markers studied were expressed in both groups after 3 and 10 days, some better preserved in the ASM. CONCLUSION: The storage of precut DMEKs is possible in ASM and OC for at least 10 days. Interestingly, a pre-dissected endothelium continues to partially exert its pump function into the ASM. In practice, this could allow the stroma to be used for DALK without further deswelling. In addition to improving the storage of whole grafts, the ASM allows the storage of precut DMEKs for up to 10 days with excellent endothelial survival.

P46-A156†Outcome after DMEK: results from the prospective Dutch registry.

The European Cornea and Cell Transplantation Registry (ECCTR) is a multi-national database for corneal transplantation surgery. ECCTR is co-founded by the Health Programme of the European Union, the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS), EuCornea and the European Eye Bank Association (EEBA). Objectives of the database are to ascertain donor tissue availability, and to analyse the safety, quality, and efficacy of corneal transplantation based on real-world outcomes including patient reported outcome measures.We describe a web-based system with a software interface for the input and output of data relating to eye banking and corneal transplantation surgery. Output of reports or export of own data is available on the web. Data is anonymous to all users, with the exception that reporting eye banks and surgeons have access to their own data. The system was designed to allow both manual input of data via the web and transfer of data from national registries, eye banks, and electronic medical record systems.Established in 2016, the ECCTR has collected data on more than 13,000 transplants from 15 European countries-including information on the recipient, donor and eye bank processing, transplant procedure, and two-year follow-up with graft survival and failure and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). We present the key findings from the registry and invite eye banks to engage with the registry.

Evolution of eye banking in India - A review.

Corneal blindness ranks third among the causes of blindness worldwide, after cataract and glaucoma. Corneal transplantation offers us a means to address this, and is currently the most commonly performed transplantation procedure worldwide - restoring the gift of sight to many an eye. Eye banks play a very important role in these procedures. India was quick to develop its own eye bank in 1945 soon after the launch of world's first eye bank in 1944. The evolution over the past six decades has been tremendous, placing India on the top, with one of the largest eye-banking system in the world. As of 2023, around 740 members are registered under the Eye Bank Association of India. The highest-ever collection of 71,700 donor eyes was achieved in 2017-2018. The overall tissue utilisation rate ranged between 22 - 28 % for voluntary donations and 50% for hospital-based corneal retrieval programs. Though India has an excellent infrastructure and readiness for corneal transplantation surgery, the need of the hour is to create a strong and independent nodal system. It shall take care of the logistics and factor in technological advances - surgical and otherwise. Public awareness, a national corneal grid, and reducing the red-tape barriers, shall improve availability of grafts nationwide. This review aims to detail the evolution of eye banking in India, to provide a comprehensive understanding, and help the stakeholders focus on the road ahead to attain our targets faster.

The role of eye banking with cell-based therapies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cell-based therapies are an exciting new frontier in managing corneal diseases. The introduction of these novel therapies may provide new alternatives to corneal transplantation and decrease the dependence on donor corneal tissue. These changes have the potential to significantly impact eye banking in the future. RECENT FINDINGS: The current article reviews current research involving cell-based therapy for treating corneal disorders, including cultivated limbal stem cell transplantation, limbal mesenchymal stem cells for stromal regeneration, and the use of human-cultivated endothelial cells. We will look at barriers to the development and implementation of these therapies. SUMMARY: As corneal surgery expands to include cell-based therapies; eye banks will need to redefine their role to support the everchanging landscape of corneal surgery and the decreased demand for corneal donor tissue.

Alteração do perfil epidemiológico das conjuntivites no Hospital Banco de Olhos de Porto Alegre após o início da pandemia da COVID-19 / Changes in epidemiology of conjunctivitis in Hospital Banco de Olhos de Porto Alegre after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic

RESUMO Objetivo O objetivo deste trabalho é avaliar o perfil epidemiológico das conjuntivites atendidas no Pronto Socorro do Hospital Banco de Olhos de Porto Alegre (HBO) com destaque à conjuntivite infecciosa e compará-lo aos atendimentos após o início da pandemia pelo Coronavírus, observando como o isolamento social e as questões de higiene amplamente enfatizadas e estimuladas desde o início a pandemia influenciaram o número de conjuntivites bacterianas e virais atendidas neste serviço de referência. Métodos Estudo transversal e retrospectivo através da análise dos prontuários eletrônicos dos pacientes atendidos no serviço de emergência do HBO no período entre março e junho de 2019 e 2020. Resultados Observou-se uma redução significativa no número de atendimento no departamento de emergência após o início da pandemia. De março a junho de 2019, 21.678 atendimentos foram realizados. No mesmo período de 2020, este número foi de 14.194, uma queda de 34,5%. O índice de conjuntivite como principal causa da visita oftalmológica diminuiu significativamente, sendo a conjuntivite infecciosa aquela que teve a maior queda. Em 2019, a mesma foi responsável por 30,2% dos atendimentos e, em 2020, por 15,5%. Não foi observado mudanças em relação ao sexo mais atendido, no entanto, observou-se um aumento significante na idade do paciente. Conclusão O estudo demonstrou uma importante redução no número de atendimentos na emergência em relacionados à conjuntivite infecciosa após o início da pandemia pelo Coronavírus. Acredita-se que este fato esteja diretamente relacionado ao aumento dos cuidados de higiene, isolamento social e a restrições impostas pela pandemia.

ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this paper is to evaluate the profile of the cases of conjuntivitis treated in the emergency department of the Banco de Olhos Hospital, emphasizing the infectious conjunctivitis, and compare before and after the onset of the Coronavirus pandemic and social isolation, both in public and private health care system. Methods A retrospective and transversal study where electronic files of the patients who visited the emergency department between March and June of 2019 and 2020 were reviewed. Results A significant reduction in the number of consultations at the emergency department was observed after the beginning of the pandemic. From March to June 2019, 21.678 visits were made. In the same period of 2020, this number was 14.194, a drop of 34.5%. The rate of visits having conjunctivitis as main cause also dropped significantly. Infectious conjunctivitis was the one who showed the highest decrease. In 2019, it was responsible for 30.2% of the visits and, in 2020, for 15.5%. There were no changes regarding the gender, but a significantly increase in patients' age was observed. Conclusion The study showed a dramatic reduction in the number of visits at the emergency department of ophthalmology regarding infectious conjunctivitis after the beginning of the pandemic, and we believe that the cause is related with an increase of hygiene care, social isolation and restrictions caused by the Coronavirus pandemic.

Advances in eye banking and corneal tissue processing.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Eye bank processing of donor corneal tissue has helped to revolutionize and popularize newer corneal transplantation surgeries. In particular, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) have benefited from eye banks preparing donor corneal tissue in advance of the surgery. As a result of these eye banking advances, surgeons have been able to rapidly adopt these new techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: This article reviews the techniques that are now being utilized to prepare donor tissue for endothelial keratoplasty (EK) with a focus on Ultrathin-DSAEK, prestamped, prestained, preloaded DMEK tissue, and advancements to improve the safety of donor corneal tissue. SUMMARY: Collaborative efforts between surgeons and eye banks have been at the core of advances that have been made in EK over the past decade. Corneal surgery starts in the eye bank, and it is important for corneal surgeons to understand the process and appreciate the efforts that have been made to provide them with suitable and safe donor corneal tissue.

The Effect of COVID-19 on Corneal Donor Volumes and Eye Bank Processes: An Analysis From the Eye Bank of Canada (Ontario Division).

PURPOSE: With the rise in COVID-19 cases, the Eye Bank of Canada (Ontario Division), the largest eye bank in Canada, was faced with challenges related to ocular donor suitability which resulted in tissue shortages after the first wave of COVID-19 cases in Ontario, Canada. This article aims to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on ocular tissue donation and transplant surgeries. METHODS: Trends in ocular donations in 2020 and the transplant rates were compared with the data from the previous year, as a benchmark of normal eye bank activity. RESULTS: Ocular donor volumes decreased during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (March-June 2020) by 65% as compared to the same period in 2019. By the end of the year 2020, this had resulted in a total reduction of 29% of ocular donor volumes as compared to 2019. The ocular transplant surgery volumes in the year 2020 decreased by 32% compared to the previous year, mostly secondary to elective surgery shutdown during the first wave. Because of tissue shortages, the Eye Bank of Canada (Ontario Division) had to import 24 corneas from the United States and cancel 7 surgeries in the year 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The decline in ocular tissue donor volumes and transplant surgery was a result of an interplay of causes related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Most importantly, ruling out of COVID-19 carriers, lockdown measures affecting tissue retrieval processes, and shutdown of elective surgery were the 3 major factors accounting for tissue shortages and surgical volume reductions.

Glasses-Assisted 3D Display System-Guided Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue Preparation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue preparation using a glasses-assisted 3-dimensional (3D) display system and to compare it with a conventional surgical microscope. METHODS: Healthy pairs of human corneas suitable for penetrating keratoplasty surgery were selected for this study. The tissues were randomly divided into 2 groups. Each pair of corneas had 1 cornea (group 1) prepared with NGENUITY (Alcon) with a 5-second staining time with vision blue, and the fellow cornea (group 2) was prepared using a OPMI Lumera 700 surgical microscope (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) with a 30-second staining time. DMEK graft preparation time, speed of stripping, graft width, and endothelial cell loss were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-eight pairs of corneas were included in this study. The graft preparation time was significantly higher in the 3D group than in the conventional group (498 ± 147 vs. 418 ± 85 seconds, P value = 0.031). The mean speed of stripping was 0.59 ± 0.081 mm/s in group 1 and 0.089 ± 0.005 mm/s in group 2 ( P value = 0.024). The mean endothelial cell density in group 1 and group 2 before tissue preparation was 2162 ± 115.21 and 2153 ± 122.45, respectively ( P value > 0.1). After tissue preparation, the endothelial cell density reduced to 1911 ± 150.72 in group 1 and 1998 ± 90.72 in group 2 ( P value = P value > 0.05). The graft width was 5.05 ± 0.71 mm in group 1 and 4.92 ± 0.23 mm in group 2 ( P value > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DMEK tissue preparation with 3D display system NGENUITY is feasible with a slightly increased preparation time. The improved visualization allows a reduced staining time that could be beneficial for eye banks because it may reduce the toxic effect of staining colorants.

Risk and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection on Corneal Transplantation: A Case-Control Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection after corneal transplantation surgery, with cataract surgeries as controls, and the impact of the novel coronavirus disease pandemic in the clinical and surgical complications of corneal transplantation and cataract surgeries. METHODS: A retrospective matched case-control study of 480 consecutive individuals who underwent surgery at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between May 2020 and November 2020. A total of 240 patients who underwent corneal transplantation with tissue obtained from the Florida Lions Eye Bank were age, race, ethnicity, and sex matched with 240 patients who underwent cataract surgery during the same day and by the same surgical team. Only the first corneal transplant or cataract surgery during this period was considered for each individual. All donors and recipients were deemed SARS-CoV-2 negative by a nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction test before surgery. Postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infections were defined as previously SARS-CoV-2(-) individuals who developed symptoms or had a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test during the first postoperative month. RESULTS: Mean age, sex, race, and ethnicity were similar between groups. There were no differences between the corneal transplant and cataract groups in the rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection before (5.8% vs. 7.5%, P= 0.6) or after surgery (2.9% vs. 2.9%, P = 1). The rates of postoperative complications did not increase during the pandemic, compared with previously reported ranges. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection was similar for individuals undergoing corneal transplantation or cataract surgery. Further research is required to evaluate the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through corneal tissue.

Clinical Utility of COVID-19 Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing of Ocular Tissues of Non-COVID-19 Cornea Donors Deemed Suitable for Corneal Retrieval and Transplantation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in human postmortem ocular tissues of asymptomatic donors and its implications on our eye banking protocols. METHODS: The expression of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was assessed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in corneal rims and conjunctival tissues from 100 donors who were found suitable for transplantation as per the donor screening guidelines of the Global Alliance of Eye Bank Associations. The donor's clinical history and cause of death were assessed for secondary analysis. RESULTS: Of 200 ocular tissues (100 corneal and 100 conjunctival) from the same 1 eye of 100 surgical-intended donors, between September 2020 and April 2021, the overall positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 was ∼1% (2/200). Both the ocular samples that tested positive were conjunctival biopsies (2/100, 2%), whereas corneal samples were negative (0/100, 0%) in both donors. The causes of donor death were trauma in 51 donors, suicide in 33, cardiac arrest in 7, electric shock in 5, metabolic cause in 2, malignancy in 1, and snake bite in 1. None of the donors had a medical history suggestive of COVID infection or possible contact. None of the recipients from the donors were reported to have any systemic adverse event after keratoplasty until the follow-up of 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was 1% (2% for conjunctival and 0% for corneal samples, P value = 0.5) in the donors who were found suitable for cornea recovery and transplantation. The findings of exceptionally low positive rates in our samples validate the criticality of history-based donor screening and do not support the necessity of postmortem PCR testing as a criterion for procurement and subsequent use for corneal transplantation.

Eye bank versus surgeon prepared DMEK tissues: influence on adhesion and re-bubbling rate.

AIM: To investigate the difference in adhesion and rebubbling rate between eye bank and surgeon prepared Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissues. METHODS: Laboratory and clinical retrospective comparative interventional case series. Research corneal tissues were obtained for laboratory investigation. The clinical study involved patients with endothelial dysfunction who underwent DMEK surgery and tamponade with air. Tissues were stripped using a standard DMEK stripping technique (SCUBA) and shipped as prestripped or loaded in a 2.2 intra-ocular lens cartridge with endothelium facing inwards (preloaded) before transporting from the eye bank to the surgeon. For surgeon prepared tissues, all the grafts were stripped in the theatre and transplanted or stripped in the laboratory and tested immediately. Adhesion force and elastic modulus were measured in the centre and mid-periphery in a laboratory ex vivo investigation using atomic force microscopy, while rebubbling rates were recorded in the clinical study. RESULTS: There was no difference in endothelial cell viability between surgeon or eye bank prepared tissue. Surgeon-stripped DMEK grafts in the laboratory investigation showed significantly higher elastic modulus and adhesion force compared to prestripped and preloaded tissues (p<0.0001). In the clinical data, rebubbling rates of 48%, 40% and 15% were observed in preloaded, prestripped and surgeon-stripped DMEK grafts, respectively. Rebubbling rates were significantly associated with combined cataract surgery (p=0.009) and with time from harvesting the graft to the surgery (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased adhesion forces and elastic modulus in eye bank prepared tissues may contribute to increased rebubbling rates.