Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 87
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0250967, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34003865

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the different levels of copayment assistance and treatment adherence among Medicare and Medicaid dual eligible beneficiaries with breast cancer in the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN: Propensity Score methodology was adopted to minimize potential selection bias from the nonrandom allocation of the treatment group (i.e., full Medicaid beneficiaries) and control group (i.e., Medicare Savings Programs [MSPs] beneficiaries). Longitudinal hierarchical model and Cox proportional-hazard model were adopted to examine patients' adherence over their full five-year course of adjuvant hormone therapy. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of 1,133 dual eligible beneficiaries diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive early stage breast cancer in years 2007 -mid 2009. About 80.5% of them received MSPs benefits, while the rest received full Medicaid benefits. On average for a standardized 30-day hormone therapy medication, full Medicaid beneficiaries spent $0.5-$2.0 and MSP beneficiaries spent $1.4-$4.8 in copayment. After adjusting for other factors, this copayment reduction wasn't associated with a significantly better adherence. However, when the catastrophic coverage threshold was reached (copayments reduced to zero), significant improvement in adherence was found in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that small amount of cost-sharing reduction did not affect Medicare and Medicaid dual eligible patients' medication treatment adherence, however, the elimination of cost-sharing (even a minimal amount) was associated with improved adherence. Future legislative and advocacy efforts should be paid on eliminating cost sharing for dual eligibles, and possibly even a broader group of financially vulnerable patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/métodos , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Adesão à Medicação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Dedutíveis e Cosseguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Medicaid , Medicare , Estados Unidos
2.
Surgery ; 169(3): 573-579, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33189365

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We sought to assess the relationship between Leapfrog minimum volume standards, Hospital Safety Grades, and Magnet recognition with outcomes among patients undergoing rectal, lung, esophageal, and pancreatic resection for cancer. METHODS: Standard Analytical Files linked with the Leapfrog Hospital Survey and the Leapfrog Safety Scores Denominator Files were used to identify Medicare patients who underwent surgery for cancer from 2016 to 2017. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine textbook outcomes relative to Leapfrog volume, safety grades, and Magnet recognition. RESULTS: Among 26,268 Medicare beneficiaries, 7,491 (28.5%) were treated at hospitals meeting the quality trifactor (Leapfrog, safety grade A, and Magnet recognition) vs 18,777 (71.5%) at hospitals not meeting ≥1 designation. Patients at trifactor hospitals had lower odds of complications (odds ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.89), prolonged duration of stay (odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.97), and higher odds of experiencing textbook outcome (odds ratio = 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.19). Patients undergoing surgery for lung (odds ratio = 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.30) and pancreatic cancer (odds ratio = 1.37, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-1.55) at trifactor hospitals had higher odds of textbook outcome, whereas this effect was not noted after esophageal (odds ratio = 1.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.90-1.48) or rectal cancer (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.27) surgery. Leapfrog minimum volume standards mediated the effect of the quality trifactor on patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Quality trifactor hospitals had better short-term outcomes after lung and pancreatic cancer surgery compared with nontrifactor hospitals.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral , Hospitais/normas , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Ambiente de Instituições de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Oncologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Razão de Chances , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estados Unidos
3.
Isr J Health Policy Res ; 9(1): 63, 2020 11 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33168058

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite relatively high rates of Postpartum Depression (PPD), little is known about the granting of social security benefits to women who are disabled as a result of PPD or of other postpartum mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD). This study aims to identify populations at risk for underutilization of social security benefits due to PMAD among Israeli women, with a focus on ethnic minorities. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study is based on the National Insurance Institute (NII) database. The study population included a simple 10% random sample of 79,391 female Israeli citizens who gave birth during 2008-2016 (these women delivered a total of 143,871 infants during the study period), and who had not been eligible for NII mental health disability benefits before 2008. The dependent variable was receipt of Benefit Entitlement (BE) due to mental illness within 2 years following childbirth. Maternal age at delivery, population group, Socio-Economic Status (SES), family status, employment status of the mother and her spouse, and infant mortality were the independent variables. Left truncation COX proportional hazard model with time-dependent variables was used, and birth number served as a time discrete variable. RESULTS: Bedouin and Arab women had significantly lower likelihood of BE (2.6 times lower and twice lower) compared with other ethnic groups (HR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.26-0.56; HR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.37-0.60 respectively). The probability of divorced or widowed women for BE was significantly higher compared to those living with a spouse (HR = 3.64; 95% CI: 2.49-5.33). Lack of employment was associated with higher likelihood of BE (HR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.30-1.82). Income had a dose-response relationship with BE in multivariable analysis: lower income was associated with the nearly four-fold greater probability compared to the highest income quartile (HR = 3.83; 95% CI: 2.89-5.07). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the exceptionally high prevalence of PMAD among ethnic minorities, Bedouins and Arabs had lowest likelihood of Benefit Entitlement. In addition to developing programs for early identification of postpartum emotional disorders among unprivileged ethnic groups, awareness regarding entitlement to a mental health disability allowance among ethnic minorities should be improved.


Assuntos
Árabes/estatística & dados numéricos , Depressão Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Judeus/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Árabes/psicologia , Estudos de Coortes , Depressão Pós-Parto/economia , Depressão Pós-Parto/etnologia , Feminino , Humanos , Renda , Seguro por Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Israel/epidemiologia , Judeus/psicologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Previdência Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
4.
Spine J ; 20(1): 32-40, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31125696

RESUMO

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Current bundled payment programs in spine surgery, such as the bundled payment for care improvement rely on the use of diagnosis-related groups (DRG) to define payments. However, these DRGs may not be adequate enough to appropriately capture the large amount of variation seen in spine procedures. For example, DRG 459 (spinal fusion except cervical with major comorbidity or complication) and DRG 460 (spinal fusion except cervical without major comorbidity or complication) do not differentiate between the type of fusion (anterior or posterior), the levels/extent of fusion, the use of interbody/graft/BMP, indication of surgery (primary vs. revision) or even if the surgery was being performed for a vertebral fracture. PURPOSE: We carried out a comprehensive analysis to report the factors responsible for cost-variation in a bundled payment model for spinal fusions. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a 5% national sample of Medicare claims from 2008 to 2014 (SAF5). OUTCOME MEASURES: To understand the independent marginal cost impact of various patient-level, geographic-level, and procedure-level characteristics on 90-day costs for patients undergoing spinal fusions under DRG 459 and 460. METHODS: The 2008 to 2014 Medicare 5% standard analytical files (SAF) were used to retrieve patients undergoing spinal fusions under DRG 459 and DRG 460 only. Patients with missing gender, age, and/or state-level data were excluded. Only those patients who had complete data, with regard to payments/costs/reimbursements, starting from day 0 of surgery up to 90 days postoperatively were included to prevent erroneous collection. Multivariate linear regression models were built to assess the independent marginal cost impact (decrease/increase) of each patient-level, state-level, and procedure-level characteristics on the average 90-day cost while controlling for other covariates. RESULTS: A total of 21,367 patients (DRG-460=20,154; DRG-459=1,213) were included in the study. The average 90-day cost for all lumbar fusions was $31,716±$18,124, with the individual 90-day payments being $54,607±$30,643 (DRG-459) and $30,338±$16,074 (DRG-460). Increasing age was associated with significant marginal increases in 90-day payments (70-74 years: +$2,387, 75-79 years: +$3,389, 80-84 years: +$2,872, ≥85: +$1,627). With regards to procedure-level factors-undergoing an anterior fusion (+$3,118), >3 level fusion (+$5,648) vs. 1 to 3 level fusion, use of interbody device (+$581), intraoperative neuromonitoring (+$1,413), concurrent decompression (+$768) and undergoing surgery for thoracolumbar fracture (+$6,169) were associated with higher 90-day costs. Most individual comorbidities were associated with higher 90-day costs, with malnutrition (+$12,264), CVA/stroke (+$5,886), Alzheimer's (+$4,968), Parkinson's disease (+$4,415), and coagulopathy (+$3,810) having the highest marginal 90-day cost-increases. The top five states with the highest marginal cost-increase, in comparison to Michigan (reference), were Maryland (+$12,657), Alaska (+$11,292), California (+$10,040), Massachusetts (+$8,800), and the District of Columbia (+$8,315). CONCLUSIONS: Under the proposed DRG-based bundled payment model, providers would be reimbursed the same amount for lumbar fusions regardless of the surgical approach (posterior vs. anterior), the extent of fusion (1-3 level vs. >3 level), use of adjunct procedures (decompressions) and cause/indication of surgery (fracture vs. degenerative pathology), despite each of these factors having different resource utilization and associated costs. When defining and developing future bundled payments for spinal fusions, health-policy makers should strive to account for the individual patient-level, state-level, and procedure-level variation seen within DRGs to prevent the creation of a financial dis-incentive in taking care of sicker patients and/or performing more extensive complex spinal fusions.


Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica/economia , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economia , Medicare/economia , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Idoso , Descompressão Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro/economia , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Região Lombossacral/cirurgia , Masculino , Fusão Vertebral/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
5.
Med Care ; 57(10): 830-835, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31453892

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey includes items about chronic conditions, health history, and self-rated health. Questions remain about the concordance between patient reports and administrative sources on questions related to health history. OBJECTIVE: To validate CAHPS measures of chronic conditions against claims-based measures from the Medicare Chronic Conditions Warehouse (CCW). METHODS: We linked CAHPS responses from 301,050 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2010-2012 with summaries of their claims in the CCW and identified nearest equivalent measures of conditions across sources. We calculated sensitivities and specificities for conditions and estimated regression models to assess the effects of patient characteristics on the sensitivity. RESULTS: The sensitivity of CAHPS measures differed across conditions, ranging from 0.513 for history of stroke to 0.773 for history of cancer. Sensitivity was generally lower for older beneficiaries, those reporting good self-rated health, and those with fair or poor mental health. Specificity was 0.904 or greater for all conditions, up to 0.961 for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Despite difference in timeframes and definitions of conditions, the measured sensitivities demonstrated reasonable validity. Variation in sensitivity is consistent with covariates that either directly measure health severity within a diagnosis or can be construed as a proxy for severity of illness.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/normas , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estados Unidos
6.
Mil Med ; 184(11-12): e847-e855, 2019 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30941433

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the USA, contributing largely to US healthcare spending. Provision of services (direct or purchased) and insurance benefit type may impact cost for cancer care. As a common cause of cancer in both men and women, we aim to compare colon cancer treatment costs between insurance benefit types and care sources in the US Military Health System (MHS) to better understand whether and to what extent these system factors impact cancer care costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Department of Defense Central Cancer Registry records and MHS Data Repository administrative claims were used to identify MHS beneficiaries aged 18-64 who were diagnosed with primary colon adenocarcinoma and received treatment between 2003 and 2008. The data linkage was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, the Defense Health Agency, and the National Institutes of Health. Costs to the MHS for each claim related to cancer treatment were extracted from the linked data and adjusted to 2008 USD. We used quantile regression models to compare median cancer treatment costs between benefit types and care sources (direct, purchased, or both), adjusted for demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: The median per capita (n = 801) costs for colon cancer care were $60,321 (interquartile range $24,625, $159,729) over a median follow-up of 1.7 years. The model-estimated treatment costs were similar between benefit types. Patients using direct care had significantly lower estimated median costs [$34,145 (standard error $4,326)] than patients using purchased care [$106,395 ($10,559)] or both care sources [$82,439 ($13,330)], controlled for patient demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Differences in cost by care source were noted for patients with later stage tumors and by treatment type. Relative costs were 2-3 times higher for purchased care compared to direct care for patients with late-stage tumors and for patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the MHS, median cost for colon cancer treatment was lower in direct care compared to purchased care or patients using a combination of direct and purchased care. The variation in cancer treatment costs between care sources may be due to differences in treatment incentives or capabilities. Additional studies on cost differences between direct and purchased services are needed to understand how provision of care affects cancer treatment costs and to identify possible targets for cost reduction.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Benefícios do Seguro/classificação , Serviços de Saúde Militar/economia , Adulto , Neoplasias do Colo/terapia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro/normas , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Serviços de Saúde Militar/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
7.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 28(5): 882-889, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30733307

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although rural cancer patients encounter substantial barriers to care, they more often report receiving timely care than urban patients. We examined whether geographic distance, a contributor to urban-rural health disparities, differentially influences treatment initiation and completion among insured urban and rural cervical cancer patients. METHODS: We identified women diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2013 from a statewide cancer registry linked to multipayer, insurance claims. Primary outcomes were initiation of guideline-concordant care within 6 weeks of diagnosis and, among stage IB2-IVA cancer patients, completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in 56 days. We estimated risk ratios using modified Poisson regressions, stratified by urban/rural status, to examine the association between distance and treatment timing (initiation or completion). RESULTS: Among 999 stage IA-IVA patients, 48% initiated guideline-concordant care within 6 weeks of diagnosis, and 37% of 492 stage IB2-IVA cancer patients completed CCRT in 56 days. In urban areas, stage IA-IVA patients who lived ≥15 miles from the nearest treatment facility were less likely to initiate timely treatment compared with those <5 miles [risk ratio (RR): 0.72; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.54-0.95]. Among IB2-IVA stage cancer patients, rural women residing ≥15 miles from the nearest radiation facility were more likely to complete CCRT in 56 days (RR: 2.49; 95% CI, 1.12-5.51). CONCLUSIONS: Geographic distance differentially influences the initiation and completion of treatment among urban and rural cervical cancer patients. IMPACT: Distance was an access barrier for insured cervical cancer patients in urban areas whereas rural patients may require more intensive outreach, support, and resources, even among those living closer to treatment.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
8.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 15(1): 146-151, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30425002

RESUMO

Despite the effectiveness of bariatric surgery, both with respect to weight loss and improvements in obesity-related co-morbidities, it remains underused. Only 1% of the currently eligible population undergoes surgical treatment for obesity, with roughly 228,000 individuals receiving bariatric surgery in the United States each year. Several barriers to bariatric surgery have been identified, including limited patient and referring physician knowledge and attitudes regarding the effectiveness and safety of bariatric surgery. However, the role of insurance coverage and benefit design as a barrier to access to care has received less attention to date. Bariatric surgery is cost-effective compared with nonsurgical treatments among individuals with extreme obesity and type 2 diabetes. While it may not result in cost savings among all bariatric surgery eligible patients, for certain patient subgroups, bariatric surgery may be cost neutral compared with traditional treatment options. In addition, longer-term outcomes of bariatric surgery suggest decreased or stable costs in the long run. The purpose of this review paper was to synthesize the existing knowledge on why bariatric surgery remains largely underused in the United States with a focus on health insurance benefits and design. In addition, the review discusses the applicability of value-based insurance design to bariatric surgery. Value-based insurance design has been previously applied to bariatric surgery coverage with use of incentive-based cost-sharing adjustments. Its application could be further extended because the postoperative clinical outcomes and costs vary among the different subgroups of bariatric surgery eligible patients.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Benefícios do Seguro , Obesidade Mórbida , Cirurgia Bariátrica/economia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro/economia , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia
9.
Urology ; 116: 68-75, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29630957

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine if Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) have the potential to accelerate the impact of prostate cancer screening recommendations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using Medicare data evaluating the rates of PSA testing and prostate biopsy among men without prostate cancer between 2011 and 2014. We assessed PSA testing and biopsy rates before and after policy implementation among patients of ACO and non-ACO-aligned physicians. To control for secular trends, difference-in-differences methods were used to determine the effects of ACO implementation. RESULTS: We identified 1.1 million eligible men without prostate cancer. From 2011 to 2014, the rates of PSA testing and biopsy declined by 22.3% and 7.0%, respectively. PSA testing declined similarly regardless of ACO participation-from 618 to 530 tests per 1000 beneficiaries among ACO-aligned physicians and from 607 to 516 tests per 1000 beneficiaries among non-ACO-aligned physicians (difference-in-differences P = .11). Whereas rates of prostate biopsy remained constant for patients of non-ACO-aligned physicians at 12 biopsies per 1000 beneficiaries, these rates increased from 11.6 to 12.5 biopsies per 1000 beneficiaries of patients of ACO-aligned physicians (difference-in-differences P = .03). CONCLUSION: PSA testing and prostate biopsy rates decreased significantly between 2011 and 2014. The rate of PSA testing was not differentially affected by ACO participation. Conversely, there was an increase in the rate of prostate biopsy among patients of ACO-aligned physicians. ACOs did not accelerate deimplementation of PSA testing for eligible Medicare beneficiaries without prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/sangue , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia por Agulha/economia , Biópsia por Agulha/estatística & dados numéricos , Redução de Custos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Expectativa de Vida , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Desnecessários/economia
10.
Obes Surg ; 28(1): 44-51, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28667512

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery has been shown to be the most effective method of achieving weight loss and alleviating obesity-related comorbidities. Yet, it is not being used equitably. This study seeks to identify if there is a disparity in payer status of patients undergoing bariatric surgery and what factors are associated with this disparity. METHODS: We performed a case-control analysis of National Inpatient Sample. We identified adults with body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 25 kg/m2 who underwent bariatric surgery and matched them with overweight inpatient adult controls not undergoing surgery. The sample was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 132,342 cases, in which the majority had private insurance (72.8%). Bariatric patients were significantly more likely to be privately insured than any other payer status; Medicare- and Medicaid-covered patients accounted for a low percentage of cases (Medicare 5.1%, OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.29-0.37, p < 0.001; Medicaid 8.7%, OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.18-0.25, p < 0.001). Medicare (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.33-1.78, p < 0.001) and Medicaid (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08-1.60, p = 0.007) patients undergoing bariatric surgery had an increased risk of complications compared to privately insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: Publicly insured patients are significantly less likely to undergo bariatric surgery. As a group, these patients experience higher rates of obesity and related complications and thus are most in need of bariatric surgery.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade Mórbida/economia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Adulto , Idoso , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/economia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Redução de Peso
11.
In Vivo ; 32(1): 113-120, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29275307

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: Prostate cancer can be treated with radical prostatectomy (RP), external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or brachytherapy (BT). These modalities have similar cancer-related outcomes. We used an innovative method to analyze the cost of such treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried our Institution's Insurance Division [University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health Plan] beneficiaries from 2003-2008, who were diagnosed with prostate cancer and also queried the UPMC tumor registry for all patients with prostate cancer treated at our Institution. In a de-identified manner, data from the Health Plan and Tumor Registry were merged. RESULTS: A total of 354 patients with non-metastatic disease with treatment initiated within 9 months of diagnosis were included (RP=236, EBRT=55, and BT=63). Radiotherapy-treated patients tended to be older, higher-risk, and have more comorbidities. Unadjusted median total health care expenditures during the first year after diagnosis were: RP: $16,743, EBRT: $47,256, and BT: $23,237 (p<0.0005). A propensity score-matched model comparing RP and EBRT demonstrated median total health care expenditures during year one: RP: $8,189, EBRT: $10,081; p=0.48. In a propensity-matched model comparing RP and BT, the median total health care expenditures during year one were: RP: $18,143, BT: $26,531; p=0.015 and per year during years 2 through 5 from diagnosis were: RP: $5,913, BT: $6,110; p=0.68. CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of combining healthcare costs from the payer's perspective with clinical data from a Tumor Registry within an IDFS and represents a novel approach to investigating the economic impact of cancer treatment.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Radioterapia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Braquiterapia/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro/economia , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Projetos Piloto , Prostatectomia/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Radioterapia/economia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 92(5): 726-733, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28473037

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To characterize early adoption of a novel multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and to test the hypothesis that adoption differs by demographic characteristics and prior CRC screening behavior and proceeds predictably over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the Rochester Epidemiology Project research infrastructure to assess the use of the MT-sDNA screening test in adults aged 50 to 75 years living in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 2014 and identified 27,147 individuals eligible or due for screening colonoscopy from November 1, 2014, through November 30, 2015. We used electronic Current Procedure Terminology and Health Care Common Procedure codes to evaluate early adoption of the MT-sDNA screening test in this population and to test whether early adoption varies by age, sex, race, and prior CRC screening behavior. RESULTS: Overall, 2193 (8.1%) and 974 (3.6%) individuals were screened by colonoscopy and MT-sDNA, respectively. Age, sex, race, and prior CRC screening behavior were significantly and independently associated with MT-sDNA screening use compared with colonoscopy use after adjustment for all other variables (P<.05 for all). The rates of adoption of MT-sDNA screening increased over time and were highest in those aged 50 to 54 years, women, whites, and those who had a history of screening. The use of the MT-sDNA screening test varied predictably by insurance coverage. The rates of colonoscopy decreased over time, whereas overall CRC screening rates remained steady. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study are generally consistent with predictions derived from prior research and the diffusion of innovation framework, pointing to increasing use of the new screening test over time and early adoption by younger patients, women, whites, and those with prior CRC screening.


Assuntos
Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , DNA de Neoplasias/análise , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Fezes/química , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Colonoscopia/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Difusão de Inovações , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro/economia , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/classificação , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minnesota , Sangue Oculto , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos
13.
Obes Surg ; 27(9): 2246-2252, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28293901

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity-related diseases cause costs to society. We studied the cost of work absenteeism before and after gastric bypass and the effects of postoperative diabetes resolution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg) (national coverage >98%) and cross-matched with data from the Social insurance Agency (coverage 100%) for the period ±3 years from operation. In 2010, a total of 7454 bariatric surgeries were performed; the study group is 4971 unique individuals with an annual income of >10,750 Euros and complete data sets. A sex-, age-, and income-matched reference population was identified for comparison. RESULTS: Patients with obesity had preoperatively a 3.5-fold higher absenteeism. During follow-up (FU), the ratio relative to the reference population remained constant. An increase of 12-14 net absenteeism days was observed in the first 3 months after surgery. Female sex (OR 1.5, CI 1.13-1.8), preoperative anti-depressant use (OR 1.5, CI 1.3-1.9), low income (OR 1.4, CI 1.2-1.8), and a history of sick leave (OR 1.004, CI 1.003-1.004) were associated with increased absenteeism during FU. Diabetes resolution did not decrease absenteeism from preoperative values. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with obesity have higher preoperative absenteeism than the reference population. Operation caused an increase the first 90 days after surgery of 12-13 days. There were no relative increases in absenteeism in the next 3 years; patients did not deviate from preoperative patterns but followed the trend of the reference population. Preoperative diabetes did not elevate that level during FU; diabetes resolution did not lower absenteeism.


Assuntos
Absenteísmo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/cirurgia , Derivação Gástrica/reabilitação , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/reabilitação , Feminino , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Gástrica/economia , Derivação Gástrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/economia , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/reabilitação , Sistema de Registros
14.
Environ Pollut ; 221: 311-317, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27919584

RESUMO

Along with the rapid socioeconomic development, air pollution in China has become a severe problem. One component of air pollution, in particular, PM2.5 has aroused wide public concern because of its high concentration. In this study, data were collected from over 900 monitoring sites of the newly constructed PM2.5 monitoring network in China. The interpolation methods were used to simulate the PM2.5 exposure level of China especially in rural areas, thus reflecting the spatial variation of PM2.5 pollution. We calculated the health benefit caused by PM2.5 in China in 2014 based on Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP), assuming achievement of China National Ambient Air Quality Standard (No. GB3095-2012). By reducing the annual average concentration of PM2.5 to the annual Grade II standard (35 µg/m3), the avoided deaths for cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease and lung cancer could reach 89,000 (95% CI, 8000-170,000), 47,000 (95% CI, 3000-91,000) and 32,000 (95% CI, 6000-58,000) per year using long term health function, respectively. The attributable fractions of cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease and lung cancer to all cause were 42%, 22% and 15%, respectively. The total economic benefits for rolling back the concentration of PM2.5 to the level of 35 µg/m3 were estimated to be 260 (95%CI: (73, 440) billion RMB and 72 (95%CI: (45, 99) billion RMB using willingness to pay (WTP) and human capital (HC) methods, respectively, which account for 0.40% (95%CI: (0.11%, 0.69%) and 0.11% (95%CI: (0.07%, 0.15%) of the total annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of China in 2014.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluição do Ar/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Material Particulado/análise , Doenças Respiratórias/mortalidade , Poluição do Ar/análise , China/epidemiologia , Produto Interno Bruto , Humanos , Saúde Pública
15.
PLoS One ; 11(7): e0157918, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27380417

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Disease has become one of the key causes of falling into poverty in rural China. The poor households are even more likely to suffer. The New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) has been implemented to provide rural residents financial protection against health risks. This study aims to assess the effect of the NCMS on alleviating health payment-induced poverty in the Shaanxi Province of China. METHODS: The data was drawn from the 5th National Health Service Survey of Shaanxi Province, conducted in 2013. In total, 41,037 individuals covered by NCMS were selected. Poverty headcount ratio (HCR), poverty gap and mean positive poverty gap were used for measuring the incidence, depth and intensity of poverty, respectively. The differences on poverty measures pre- and post- insurance reimbursement indicate the effectiveness of alleviating health payment-induced poverty under NCMS. RESULTS: For the general insured, 5.81% of households fell below the national poverty line owing to the health payment; this HCR dropped to 4.84% after insurance reimbursement. The poverty HCRs for the insured that had hospitalization in the past year dropped from 7.50% to 2.09% after reimbursement. With the NCMS compensation, the poverty gap declined from 42.90 Yuan to 34.49 Yuan (19.60% decreased) for the general insured and from 57.48 Yuan to 10.01 Yuan (82.59% decreased) for the hospital admission insured. The mean positive poverty gap declined 3.56% and 37.40% for two samples, respectively. CONCLUSION: The NCMS could alleviate the health payment-induced poverty. The effectiveness of alleviating health payment-induced poverty is greater for hospital admission insured than for general insured, mainly because NCMS compensates for serious diseases. Our study suggests that a more comprehensive insurance benefit package design could further improve the effectiveness of poverty alleviation.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/métodos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Benefícios do Seguro/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/economia , Pobreza/prevenção & controle , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Serviços de Saúde Rural/economia , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Classe Social , Adulto Jovem
16.
Soc Sci Med ; 163: 117-25, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27423068

RESUMO

Understanding the health consequences of retirement is important, as many developed countries have already started raising state pension eligibility age, with the intention to induce postponed retirement. This paper estimates the causal effect of retirement on the health outcomes of older women in Australia, utilising the exogenous variation in retirement induced by the change in age eligibility for the Australian Age Pension. Using a sample of 19,185 observations for 3771 women from waves 2001-2011 of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, we show that retirement status has positive and significant effects on women's self-reported health, physical and mental health outcomes. We also find that longer time spent in retirement confers clear additional health benefits. We show that retirement affects physical and mental health in diverse ways and that the estimated positive health effects of retirement are coincidental with increased post-retirement physical activity and reduced smoking. Our finding that retirement can improve health suggests that the welfare losses from working life prolongation policies will be larger than currently though when we include the cost of the foregone health improvements.


Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Aposentadoria/tendências , Saúde da Mulher/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Benefícios do Seguro/normas , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Pensões/estatística & dados numéricos , Aposentadoria/economia , Aposentadoria/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Saúde da Mulher/economia , Saúde da Mulher/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 36(7): 946-949, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27188983

RESUMO

This study determined the obstetric benefits and compared the obstetric indices and pregnancy outcome of enrollees and non-enrollees of the national health insurance scheme (NHIS). A prospective cohort study of enrollees and non-enrollees of NHIS was conducted over 2 years. Data was analysed with Epi-info statistical software. Malaria (25.3% versus 8.0%, p value ≤0.001), anaemia (11.3% versus 3.3%, p value ≤0.0001), preterm delivery (8.0% versus 2.7% p value = 0.00001), antenatal default rate (22.7% versus 6.7%, p value = 0.0001) and maternal death (2.7% versus 0.7%, p value = 0.00001) were higher in the non-insured. Singleton low birth weight (9.3% versus 2.7%, p value = 0.00001) and new born admission (10.7% versus 4.7%, p value = 0.00001) were also more in non-enrollee, with higher perinatal deaths (6.7% versus 2.0%, p value = 0.00001). Women managed under the Nigerian NHIS scheme had better maternal and perinatal indices, therefore, effort should be scaled up to ensure universal health insurance coverage for all parturient and their newborn.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perinatal , Complicações na Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Parto Obstétrico/economia , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Recém-Nascido , Mortalidade Materna , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Assistência Perinatal/economia , Assistência Perinatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Perinatal , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/economia , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/economia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/economia , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos
18.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 64(3): 145-52, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27238161

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare incidence of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer incidence estimated from a French administrative database with the incidences estimated from the cancer registry data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 426,410 people included in the general sample of health insurance beneficiaries (EGB) database as of January 1, 2007, was constituted. Several algorithms were developed to estimate cancer incidence between 2008 and 2012 using principal diagnosis (PD) of hospital discharge data (medical information systems program [PMSI]) and/or long-term disease (LTD) and together with a procedure necessary for histological diagnosis and indicating initial disease management. The incidence rates obtained were compared with those from the registry data using the standardized incidence ratio (SIR). RESULTS: The algorithm taking into account LTD and PD in the PMSI and the mandatory presence of a marker procedure provided estimates close to those from the registry data for breast cancer (SIR: 1.12 [1.07-1.18]) and colorectal cancer (SIR: 0.94 [0.88-1.02] in men and SIR: 0.93 [0.86-1.01] in women). For prostate cancer, taking into account specific procedures and drugs in addition to LTD and PD in the PMSI enhanced the estimation of incidence (SIR: 1.03 [0.98-1.08]). CONCLUSION: The PMSI together with reimbursement data (LTD, procedures, drugs) provided estimates of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer incidence, at a national level, comparable to those from the cancer registry data.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos
19.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 13(4): 600-603, Oct.-Dec. 2015. tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-770503

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective To identify the financial resources and investments provided for preventive medicine programs by health insurance companies of all kinds. Methods Data were collected from 30 large health insurance companies, with over 100 thousand individuals recorded, and registered at the Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar. Results It was possible to identify the percentage of participants of the programs in relation to the total number of beneficiaries of the health insurance companies, the prevention and promotion actions held in preventive medicine programs, the inclusion criteria for the programs, as well as the evaluation of human resources and organizational structure of the preventive medicine programs. Conclusion Most of the respondents (46.7%) invested more than US$ 50,000.00 in preventive medicine program, while 26.7% invested more than US$ 500,000.00. The remaining, about 20%, invested less than US$ 50,000.00, and 3.3% did not report the value applied.


RESUMO Objetivo Identificar os recursos financeiros e os investimentos disponibilizados para os programas de medicina preventiva em operadoras de saúde suplementar de todos os tipos. Métodos Foram levantados dados referentes a 30 operadoras de saúde registradas na Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar, de grande porte, com registro acima de 100 mil vidas. Resultados Foi possível identificar o porcentual de participantes dos programas em relação ao número total de beneficiários da operadora, as ações de prevenção e promoção realizadas nos programas de medicina preventiva, os critérios de inclusão nos programas, bem como a avaliação dos recursos humanos e da estrutura organizacional dos programas de medicina preventiva pesquisadas. Conclusão A maior parte dos pesquisados (46,7%) investiu mais de US$ 50,000.00 no programa de medicina preventiva, enquanto 26,7% investiram mais de US$ 500,000.00. Os restantes, cerca de 20%, investiram menos de US$ 50,000.00 e 3,3% não informaram o valor aplicado.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/organização & administração , Medicina Preventiva/organização & administração , Setor Privado/organização & administração , Brasil , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Seguro Saúde/classificação , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Inquéritos e Questionários
20.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 28(4): 183-92, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26200026

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to describe antibiotic consumption in the Region of Murcia in 2011, within the Spanish and European context, as well as to analyze the differences within the Region, both between health areas, and between users of the regional health service and those protected by the civil servants' mutual insurance society (MUFACE). METHODS: Retrospective observational study of prescriptions dispensed by the pharmacies in the Region of Murcia during 2011. Consumption rates were expressed as defined daily doses (DDD) per 1,000 inhabitants/day and standardized consumption ratios (SCR). RESULTS: Overall antibiotics consumption rate in the Region of Murcia in 2011 was 30.05 DDD/1000/ day (DID), which is much above the average rate for Spain (20.9 DID) and for the European Union (21.57 DID). Health areas within the Region with the highest and lowest consumption rate are, respectively, Vega Alta (SCR: 124.44; CI95% 124.26 to 124.61) and Cartagena (SCR:84.16; CI95% 84.10 to 84.22). Civil servants covered by the mutual society have higher consumption rates than users of the regional health service (SCR: 105.01; CI95% 104.86 to 105.17). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high level of antibiotic prescription in the Region of Murcia Region in relative terms. A great variability in antibiotics consumption was observed between the different health areas, which might be related to the higher rate of the frequency of visits. The highest amount of variability in antibiotics prescription was found in cephalosporins and macrolides.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Área Programática de Saúde , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , União Europeia , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA