Failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: prevention, identification and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is an increasing awareness of the significance of intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery. Failure of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery can occur preoperatively or intraoperatively. Testing of the neuraxial block can identify preoperative failure. Recognition of the risk of high neuraxial block in repeat spinal in case of preoperative failure is important. RECENT FINDING: Knowledge of risk factors for block failure facilitates prevention by selecting the most appropriate neuraxial procedure, adequate intrathecal doses and choice of technique. Intraoperative pain is not uncommon, and neither obstetricians nor anesthesiologists can adequately identify intraoperative pain. Early intraoperative pain should be treated differently from pain towards the end of surgery. SUMMARY: Block testing is crucial to identify preoperative failure of spinal anesthesia. Repeat neuraxial is possible but care must be taken with dosing. In this situation, switching to a combined spinal epidural or an epidural technique can be useful. Intraoperative pain must be acknowledged and adequately treated, including offering general anesthesia. Preoperative informed consent should include block failure and its management.

PROSPECT guidelines for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has become increasingly popular due to faster recovery times and reduced postoperative pain compared with thoracotomy. However, analgesic regimens for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vary significantly. The goal of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. A systematic review was undertaken using procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology. Randomised controlled trials published in the English language, between January 2010 and January 2021 assessing the effect of analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions were identified. We retrieved 1070 studies of which 69 randomised controlled trials and two reviews met inclusion criteria. We recommend the administration of basic analgesia including paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitors pre-operatively or intra-operatively and continued postoperatively. Intra-operative intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion may be used, specifically when basic analgesia and regional analgesic techniques could not be given. In addition, a paravertebral block or erector spinae plane block is recommended as a first-choice option. A serratus anterior plane block could also be administered as a second-choice option. Opioids should be reserved as rescue analgesics in the postoperative period.

Postoperative pain after clitoral reconstruction in women with female genital mutilation: An evaluation of practices.

INTRODUCTION: More than 200 million women and girls have undergone genital mutilation. Clitoral reconstruction (CR) can improve the quality of life of some of them, but is accompanied by significant postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE: Assess and describe the management of postoperative pain after CR, and the practices amongst specialists in different countries. METHODS: Between March and June 2020, 32 surgeons in 14 countries (Germany, Austria, Belgium, Burkina Faso, Canada, Ivory Coast, Egypt, Spain, United States of America, France, the Netherlands, Senegal, Switzerland, Sweden) responded to an online questionnaire on care and analgesic protocols for CR surgery. RESULTS: At day 7 post CR, 97% of the surgeons observed pain amongst their patients, which persisted up to 1 month for half of them. 22% of the participants reported feeling powerless in the management of such pain. The analgesic treatments offered are mainly step II and anti-inflammatory drugs (61%). Screening for neuropathic pain is rare (3%), as is the use of pudendal nerve block, used by 8% of the care providers and only for a small percentage of women. CONCLUSION: Pain after CR is frequent, long-lasting, and potentially an obstacle for the women who are willing to undergo clitoral surgery and also their surgeons. Most surgeons from different countries follow analgesic protocols that do not use the full available therapeutic possibilities. Early treatment of neuropathic pain, optimisation of dosing of standard analgesics, addition of opioids, use of acupuncture, and routine intraoperative use of pudendal nerve block might improve the management of pain after CR.

Role of paracervical block in reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy: A systematic reivew and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to evaluate the effect of paracervical anesthetic block among women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: A systematic search was done in Cochrane Library, PubMed, ISI web of science, and Scopus during January 2021. We selected randomized clinical trials (RCTs) compared paracervical anesthetic block versus normal saline (control group) among women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. We pooled the continuous data as mean difference (MD) and dichotomous data as risk ratio (RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals using Revman software. Our primary outcome was pain scores evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) at 30 min and 1 hour. Our secondary outcomes were postoperative additional opioids requirement and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Three RCTs met our inclusion criteria with a total number of 233 patients. We found that paracervical anesthetic block was linked to a significant reduction in VAS pain score at 30 min and 1 hour post-hysterectomy (MD= -2.13, 95% CI [-3.09, -1.16], p>0.001 & MD= -1.87, 95% CI [-3.22, -0.52], p = 0.006). There was a significant decrease in additional opioids requirement postoperatively among paracervical anesthetic block group in comparison with control group (p = 0.002). No significant difference was found between both groups regarding the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Paracervical anesthetic block is effective in reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy with decrease in opioids administration postoperatively.

The Anatomical Distribution of the Pudendal Nerve Block Injection: A Cadaveric Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of commonly used injection locations of the pudendal nerve block by examining the proximity of the injected dye to the pudendal nerve in a cadaveric model. METHODS: Pudendal block injections at 4 sites were placed transvaginally on 5 cadaveric pelvises. These sites were 1 cm proximal to the ischial spine (black dye), at the ischial spine (red dye), 1 cm distal to the ischial spine (blue dye), and 2 cm lateral and 2 cm distal to the ischial spine (green dye). The cadavers were dissected via a posterior approach. RESULTS: We measured the shortest distance from the center of the dye-stained tissue to the pudendal nerve. As expected, the injections at the ischial spine (red) resulted in a distribution of dye closest to the pudendal nerve, averaging 3.0 ± 0.95 mm. Dyes at other sites were close to the nerve: 3.1 ± 1.00 mm (black), 3.6 ± 1.14 mm (blue), and 4.05 ± 1.28 mm (green). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the injection site, all dyes were close the pudendal nerve, indicating accuracy. We observed wide variation in the dye distribution even though all injections were performed by the same provider, implicating lack of precision. Based on our findings, we propose that the most effective injection location is at the ischial spine because it is the closest to the pudendal nerve; however, all injections were within 4 mm of the pudendal nerve, suggesting that only 1 to 2 injections may be sufficient.

Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Opioid Reduction Protocol after Anorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for anorectal disease is thought to cause significant postoperative pain. Our previous work demonstrated that most opioids prescribed after anorectal surgery are not used. We aimed to evaluate a standardized protocol for pain control after anorectal surgery. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated a standardized opioid reduction protocol over a 13-mo period for all patients undergoing elective anorectal surgery at our institution. Protocol components include preoperative query, procedural local-anesthetic blocks, first-line nonopioid analgesic use ± opioid prescription of five pills, and standardized postoperative instructions. Patients completed questionnaires at postoperative follow-up. Patients with history of opioid abuse or use within 30 d of operation, loss to follow-up, or surgical complications were excluded. Primary outcome was quality of pain control on a five-point scale. Secondary outcomes included use of nonopioid analgesics, opioids used, and need for refill. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were included. Mean age was 47 ± 17 y with 23 women (42%). Anorectal abscess/fistula procedures were the most common (69%) followed by pilonidal procedures (11%) and hemorrhoidectomy (7%). Most had general anesthesia (60%) with the remainder local anesthesia ± sedation. Fifty-four (98%) had procedural local-anesthetic blocks. Twenty-six patients (47%) were prescribed opioids with a median of five pills. Forty-seven patients (85%) reported the use of nonopioid analgesics. Forty-six patients (84%) reported excellent to very good pain control. About 220 opioid pills were prescribed, and 122 were reported to be used. One patient (2%) received an opioid refill. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory pain control after anorectal surgery can be achieved with multimodality therapy with little to no opioid use for most patients.

Wrong-site nerve blocks: evidence-review and prevention strategies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There has been increasing attention to wrong site medical procedures over the last 20 years. This review aims to provide a summary of the current understanding and recommendations for the prevention of wrong-site nerve blocks (WSNB). RECENT FINDINGS: Various procedural, patient, practitioner, and organizational factors have been associated with the risk of WSNB. Recent findings have suggested that the use of a checklist is likely to reduce the incidence of WSNB. However, despite the widespread use of preprocedural checklists, WSNB continue to occur at significant frequency. This may be due to the inability of practitioners and teams to implement checklists correctly or the cognitive errors that prevent checklists from being executed as designed. SUMMARY: Though the evidence is limited, it is recommended that a combination of multiple strategies should be employed to prevent WSNB. These include the use of preprocedural markings, well constructed checklists, time-out/stop-moments, and cognitive/physical aids. Effective implementation requires team education and engagement that empowers all team members to speak up as part of a culture of safety.

Intraoperative Intercostal Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Pre-Pectoral versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Patients undergoing mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction have significant acute postsurgical pain. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of intercostal nerve blocks (ICNBs) for reducing pain after direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Between January 2019 and March 2020, patients who underwent immediate DTI breast reconstruction were included in this study. The patients were divided into the ICNB or control group. In the ICNB group, 4 cc of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected intraoperatively to the second, third, fourth, and fifth intercostal spaces just before implant insertion. The daily average and maximum visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were recorded by the patient from operative day to postoperative day (POD) seven. Pain scores were compared between the ICNB and control groups and analyzed according to the insertion plane of implants. Results: A total of 67 patients with a mean age of 47.9 years were included; 31 patients received ICNBs and 36 patients did not receive ICNBs. There were no complications related to ICNBs reported. The ICNB group showed a significantly lower median with an average VAS score on the operative day (4 versus 6, p = 0.047), lower maximum VAS scores on the operative day (5 versus 7.5, p = 0.030), and POD 1 (4 versus 6, p = 0.030) as compared with the control group. Among patients who underwent subpectoral reconstruction, the ICNB group showed a significantly lower median with an average VAS score on the operative day (4 versus 7, p = 0.005), lower maximum VAS scores on the operative day (4.5 versus 8, p = 0.004), and POD 1 (4 versus 6, p = 0.009), whereas no significant differences were observed among those who underwent pre-pectoral reconstruction. Conclusions: Intraoperative ICNBs can effectively reduce immediate postoperative pain in subpectoral DTI breast reconstruction; however, it may not be effective in pre-pectoral DTI reconstruction.

Adductor canal block with periarticular infiltration versus periarticular infiltration alone after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative analgesia may enhance early rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to perform a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficiency of adductor canal block (ACB) with periarticular infiltration (PAI) versus PAI alone for early postoperative pain treatment after TKA. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, written informed consent was obtained from patients undergoing elective TKA. Subjects were randomized into 2 groups as follows: adductor canal blockade with 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and 100 mcg of clonidine. All patients received a periarticular infiltration mixture intraoperatively with scheduled and patient requested oral and IV analgesics postoperatively for breakthrough pain. The primary outcome was morphine consumption in the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, morphine consumption at 48 hours, opioid-related side effects (post-operative nausea/vomiting, sedation scores), functional outcomes, quadriceps strength, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: For the present trial, we hypothesized that patients receiving adductor canal block + PAI would have significantly lower morphine consumption and pain scores after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: researchregistry5490.

Implementation of the Obturator Nerve Block into a Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Based Analgesia Protocol for Hip Arthroscopy: Retrospective Pre-Post Study.

Background and Objectives: The effect of supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (SI-FICB) in hip arthroscopy is not apparent. It is also controversial whether SI-FICB can block the obturator nerve, which may affect postoperative analgesia after hip arthroscopy. We compared analgesic effects before and after the implementation of obturator nerve block into SI-FICB for hip arthroscopy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 90 consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroscopy from January 2017 to August 2019. Since August 2018, the analgesic protocol was changed from SI-FICB to SI-FICB with obturator nerve block. According to the analgesic regimen, patients were categorized as group N (no blockade), group F (SI-FICB only), and group FO (SI-FICB with obturator nerve block). Primary outcome was the cumulative opioid consumption at 24 hours after surgery. Additionally, cumulative opioid consumption at 6 and 12 hours after surgery, pain score, additional analgesic requests, intraoperative opioid consumption and hemodynamic stability, and postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed. Results: Among 87 patients, there were 47 patients in group N, 21 in group F, and 19 in group FO. The cumulative opioid (fentanyl) consumption at 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the group FO compared with the group N (N: 678.5 (444.0-890.0) µg; FO: 482.8 (305.8-635.0) µg; p = 0.014), whereas the group F did not show a significant difference (F: 636.0 (426.8-803.0) µg). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that implementing obturator nerve block into SI-FICB can reduce postoperative opioid consumption in hip arthroscopy.

Ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block alleviates postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common postoperative complication in older patients undergoing thoracic surgery and presages poor outcomes. Postoperative pain is an important factor in the progression of delirium. The purpose of this study was to test whether continuous thoracic paravertebral block (PVB), a more effective approach for analgesia, could decrease the incidence of delirium in elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: A total of 180 geriatric patients undergoing esophagectomy were randomly divided into 2 groups and treated with PVB or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Perioperative plasma CRP, IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α levels were detected in all patients. Pain intensity was measured by a numerical rating scale. Delirium was assessed using the confusion assessment method. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative delirium was significantly lower in the PVB group than in the PCA group. Patients in the PVB group had lower plasma CRP, IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α levels and less pain when coughing after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block improved analgesia, reduced the inflammatory reaction and decreased the occurrence of delirium after surgery.

Adductor canal block versus periarticular infiltration for pain control following total knee arthroplasty: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Periarticular infiltration (PAI) and adductor canal block (ACB) have become popular modes of pain management after total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of ACB in comparison with PAI for pain control in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This study is a prospective, 2-arm, parallel-group, open-label randomized controlled trial that is conducted at a single university hospital in China. A total of 120 patients who meet inclusion criteria are randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to either ACB or PAI group. The primary outcome is visual analog scale score at rest 24 hours after surgery, whereas the secondary outcomes include visual analog scale score at 48 hours after surgery, satisfaction, opioid consumption, and complications. All pain scores are assessed by an independent observer who is blinded to the allocation of groups. RESULTS: This study has limited inclusion and exclusion criteria and a well-controlled intervention. This clinical trial is expected to provide evidence of better therapy for the pain management after total knee arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5410).

Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Immediate Postoperative Recovery: A Single-Institution Survey of Perianesthesia Nurses' Preferences and Opinions.

PURPOSE: To ascertain the preferences of perianesthesia nurses regarding peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) and their impact on patient recovery after total joint replacement (TJR). DESIGN: Survey of perianesthesia nurses at a single medical center. METHODS: Fifty-nine perianesthesia nurses completed a 23-question survey on PNBs for TJR. FINDINGS: Most agreed PNBs improved patients' pain after knee, hip, and shoulder TJR (35 [92.1%], 35 [92.1%], and 34 [91.9%], respectively). Most felt lower extremity PNBs increased risk of falling (26 [70.3%]), whereas 7 of 35 (20.0%) felt patients fell more after spinal anesthesia than after general anesthesia. Respondents preferred a block to opioid-based analgesia if they were to have lower extremity TJR or total shoulder replacement (100% [30/30 and 33/33]). CONCLUSIONS: The perianesthesia nurses surveyed felt PNBs improved pain control and patient recovery despite a perceived risk of falling for lower extremity TJR, and they preferred PNB when considering TJR surgery for themselves.

French clinical guidelines for peripheral motor nerve blocks in a PRM setting.

INTRODUCTION: Motor nerve blocks with anesthetic drug for local anesthesia are commonly used in physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM), especially in the field of spasticity. Guidelines in this context are currently lacking. METHOD: Eighteen experts selected on the basis of their recognized experience by the scientific committees of the French PRM (SOFMER) and Anesthesia and Intensive care (SFAR) societies were invited to work and propose guidelines for the use of loco-regional anesthetic drug for motor nerve blocks in PRM setting. Eight issues were addressed: which neural blocks for which indications; drugs and contraindications; medical survey and attitude in case of adverse event; injection and guidance material; patient preparation and pain relief; efficacy assessment; patient information; education of PRM physiatrists. The Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases for the period 1999 to 2018 were consulted and 355 papers analyzed. The drafts were commented then approved by the whole group using electronic vote, before final approval by scientific committee of each society. RESULTS: No scientific evidence emerged from the literature. Thus, these guidelines are mainly based on the opinion of the expert panel. Guidelines for each issue are reported with the main points of arguments. The main question deals with the recommendation about doses for each drug: for lidocaine - up to 2mg/kg - "check contraindications, emergency truck available, no need of previous anesthetic consultation nor presence of anesthetic physician"; for ropivacaine - up to 1.5mg/kg, with a maximum of 100mg - the same but after intravenous line. Beyond these doses, SFAR guidelines have to be applied with the need of anesthetic physician. CONCLUSION: These are the first organizational guidelines devoted to increase the security of motor nerve block use in PRM settings.

Regional Nerve Blocks-Best Practice Strategies for Reduction in Complications and Comprehensive Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Understanding the etiologies of the complications associated with regional anesthesia and implementing methods to reduce their occurrence provides an opportunity to foster safer practices in the delivery of regional anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Neurologic injuries following peripheral nerve block (PNB) and neuraxial blocks are rare, with most being transient. However, long-lasting and devastating sequelae can occur with regional anesthesia. Risk factors for neurologic injury following PNB include type of block, injection in the presence of deep sedation or general anesthesia, presence of existing neuropathy, mechanical trauma from the needle, pressure injury, intraneural injection, neuronal ischemia, iatrogenic injury related to surgery, and local anesthetic neurotoxicity. The present investigation discusses regional blocks, complications of regional blocks, risk factors, site-specific limitations, specific complications and how to prevent them from happening, avoiding complications in regional anesthesia, and the future of regional anesthesia.

The utility of diagnostic selective nerve root blocks in the management of patients with lumbar radiculopathy: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar radiculopathy (LR) often manifests as pain in the lower back radiating into one leg (sciatica). Unsuccessful back surgery is associated with significant healthcare costs and risks to patients. This review aims to examine the diagnostic accuracy of selective nerve root blocks (SNRBs) to identify patients most likely to benefit from lumbar decompression surgery. DESIGN: Systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary research articles using a patient population with low back pain and symptoms in the leg, SNRB administered under radiological guidance as index test, and any reported reference standard for the diagnosis of LR. INFORMATION SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, Biosis, LILACS, Dissertation abstracts and National Technical Information Service from inception to 2018. METHODS: Risk of bias and applicability was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed random-effects logistic regression to meta-analyse studies grouped by reference standard. RESULTS: 6 studies (341 patients) were included in this review. All studies were judged at high risk of bias. There was substantial heterogeneity across studies in sensitivity (range 57%-100%) and specificity (10%-86%) estimates. Four studies were diagnostic cohort studies that used either intraoperative findings during surgery (pooled sensitivity: 93.5% [95% CI 84.0 to 97.6]; specificity: 50.0% [16.8 to 83.2]) or 'outcome following surgery' as the reference standard (pooled sensitivity: 90.9% [83.1 to 95.3]; specificity 22.0% [7.4 to 49.9]). Two studies had a within-patient case-control study design, but results were not pooled because different types of control injections were used. CONCLUSIONS: We found limited evidence which was of low methodological quality indicating that the diagnostic accuracy of SNRB is uncertain and that specificity in particular may be low. SNRB is a safe test with a low risk of clinically significant complications, but it remains unclear whether the additional diagnostic information it provides justifies the cost of the test.

Comparison of programmed intermittent bolus infusion and continuous infusion for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with thoracic paravertebral block catheter: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In this randomized, double-blind, controlled study, we hypothesized that programmed intermittent bolus infusion (PIBI) of local anesthetic for continuous paravertebral block (PVB), combined with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), provided better pain control, better patient satisfaction, and decreased in local anesthetic consumption when compared with a continuous infusion (CI) combined with PCA, after video-assisted thoracoscopic unilateral lung resection surgery. METHODS: Preoperatively, patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic unilateral lung resection surgery received ipsilateral paravertebral catheters inserted at the level of thoracic vertebrae 4 and 5. All the subjects received an initial bolus of 15 mL 0.375% ropivacaine via the catheters. Subjects were randomized to receive 0.2 % ropivacaine 8 mL/h as either PIBI (n=17) or CI (n=17) combined with a PCA pump. The pain scores, frequency of PCA, local anesthetic consumption, patient satisfaction, and the need for rescue analgesia with tramadol were recorded until 48 hours postoperative. RESULTS: The numeric rating scale scores in the PIBI group were significantly lower than the CI group at 4, 8, 12 hours and 4, 8, 12, 24 hours postoperatively, at rest, and during coughing, respectively. PCA local anesthetic consumption (30 mg (20-60 mg) vs 120 mg (70-155 mg), p=0.000) and frequency of PCA use over 48 hours (3 (2-6) vs 12 (7-15.5), p=0.000) was lower in the PIBI group as compared with the CI group. Additionally, the PIBI group showed greater patient satisfaction. The need for tramadol rescue was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In PVBs, local anesthetic administered as a PIBI in conjunction with PCA provided superior postoperative analgesia to a CI combined with PCA in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic unilateral lung resection surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-IOR-17011253.

Exploring performance of, and attitudes to, Stop- and Mock-Before-You-Block in preventing wrong-side blocks.

We conducted an online survey to assess the career experiences of wrong side blocks, the practice of Stop-Before-You-Block, the recently described method of Mock-Before-You-Block and attitudes to these. Respondents were 208 anaesthetists across nine hospitals (173 consultants or Staff and Associate Specialist doctors'), representing 3623 years of collective anaesthetic practice. There had been a total of 62 wrong side blocks (by 51 anaesthetists and one current trainee). Predisposing factors for this were commonly ascribed to distractions (35 (69%), for example due to rushing or teaching), patient positioning (9 (18%)) or miscommunication (6 (12%)). Two (4%) respondents felt they had performed Stop-Before-You-Block too early; 62 (41%) of all respondents stated they performed Stop-Before-You-Block as early as preparing the skin or on arrival of the patient in the anaesthetic room, and not any later. Twenty (10%) respondents admitted to not performing Stop-Before-You-Block at all or only occasionally (including 5 (2%) who had performed a wrong side block). Mock-Before-You-Block was easily understood (by 169 out of 197 (86%)) and 14 out of 61 (23%) respondents felt it would have prevented the wrong side error in their case. However, free-text comments indicated that many anaesthetists were reluctant to use a method that interrupted their performance of the block. We conclude that considerable work is needed to achieve full compliance with Stop-Before-You-Block at the correct time.

The Trajectory of Postoperative Pain Following Mastectomy with and without Paravertebral Block.

Evidence to support the argument that general anesthesia (GA) with paravertebral block (PVB) provides better pain relief for mastectomy patients than GA alone is contradictory. The aim of this study was to explore pain and analgesia after mastectomy with or without PVB during acute inpatient recovery. A retrospective study was conducted in a single hospital providing specialist cancer services in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. We explored pain and concomitant analgesic administration in 80 consecutive women recovering from mastectomy who underwent GA with (n = 40) or without (n = 40) PVB. A pain management index (PMI) was derived to illustrate the efficacy of management from day of surgery (DOS) to postoperative day (POD) 3. Patients who reported no pain progressively increased from DOS (n = 12, 15%) to POD 3 (n = 54, 67.5%). Most patients were administered analgesics as a combination of acetaminophen and a strong opioid on DOS (n = 53, 66.2%), POD 1 (n = 45, 56.2%), POD 2 (n = 33, 41.2%), and POD 3 (n = 21, 26.2%). Less than 6% of patients on any POD were administered multimodal anlagesics. PMI scores indicate some pain in the context of receiving weak and strong opioids for GA patients and more frequent use of nonopioid analgesics in PVB patients during recovery. These findings highlight the need for data describing patterns of analgesic administration in addition to reports of postoperative pain to determine the most effective means of avoiding postoperative pain in patients who require mastectomy.

Pupillary Reflex for Evaluation of Thoracic Paravertebral Block: A Prospective Observational Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Although thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is recommended in major breast surgery, there is no gold standard to assess the success of TPVB. Pupillary dilation reflex (PDR) is the variation of the pupillary diameter after a noxious stimulus. The objective was to evaluate the feasibility of recording the PDR to assess analgesia in an anesthetized thoracic dermatome after TPVB. METHODS: This prospective, observational, single-center study included 32 patients requiring breast surgery under general anesthesia and TPVB. TPVB was performed before surgery under ultrasound guidance with 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine. At the end of the surgery, remifentanil was stopped and the PDR was recorded after a 5-second tetanic stimulation (60 mA, 100 Hz) applied to the anterior chest wall. The PDR was defined as the maximal increase in pupil diameter after a standardized noxious stimulus, expressed as a percentage of the initial pupil diameter. The PDR was recorded twice in the same eye for each patient after a stimulus on both the TPVB and the control sides. Postoperative pain scores were recorded in a postanesthesia care unit. The primary outcome was the difference between the PDR on the TPVB and the control sides. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) PDR was 9% (4%-13%) on the TPVB side and 41% (27%-66%) on the control side. There was a significant difference in the PDR between the TPVB and the control sides with a Hodges-Lehmann estimate of absolute difference of 37% points (95% confidence interval, 25-52, P < .001). Median postoperative pain scores (interquartile range) in the postanesthesia care unit were 1 (0-3) at rest and 1 (0-3) during mobilization, respectively. There was a linear correlation between maximal postoperative pain scores and the PDR on the TPVB side with a Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.66, P = .02). No correlation was found between the number of blocked dermatomes and maximal postoperative pain scores (P = .06) or between the number of blocked dermatomes and the PDR on the TPVB side (P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept trial suggests that the effect of TPVB could be monitored by measuring the PDR after anterior chest wall stimulation in the dermatome of interest.