Anxiety and pain related to mandibular block injections: comparison of self-reported measures and physiological response.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with a pain score ≥7 (high pain group) after a mandibular block injection had a higher physiologic response compared with patients with scores <7 (low pain group). STUDY DESIGN: Before oral surgery, patients (n = 66) filled out questionnaires to measure anxiety and expected pain. The questionnaires also assessed patients' experiences with dental injections and dental anxiety, as well as their emotional state and intensity of anxiety. Before, during, and after the injection, physiologic responses were measured by using Nexus-10. Patients were then asked about the pain and anxiety they had experienced. RESULTS: The mean score for pain experienced was 3.45 (standard deviation 2.17) on an 11-point rating scale. Eight patients (12.1%) experienced high injection pain. There was a significant increase in mean sweat secretion and a significant decrease in mean respiration between the relaxing phase and the injection phase. There was a significant positive relationship between experienced anxiety and mean heart rate during the injection phase. No significant difference in physiologic response was found between patients who experienced high pain and those who experienced low pain. CONCLUSIONS: Reported pain was not associated with the physiologic response of patients receiving mandibular block injections.

Assessment of general pre and postoperative anxiety in patients undergoing tooth extraction: a prospective study.

Our aim was to analyse the amount of anxiety and fear felt before, immediately after, and one week after, dental extraction. We studied 70 patients (35 men and 35 women (mean (SD) age 43 (±10) years), who were listed for dental extraction under local anaesthesia in a private clinic that specialised in oral surgery. Patients were evaluated on 3 consecutive occasions: immediately preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 7 days later. Each patient's anxiety was measured using Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Spanish version), the Modified Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and the Dental Fear Survey. There were significant differences in the STAI-Trait scale between before and 7 days after extraction (p=0.04), and in the MDAS between before and immediately after extraction (p=0.02), and between immediately after and 7 days after extraction (p=<0.001). The DFS also differed between before and immediately after extraction (p=0.002), and between immediately and 7 days after extraction (p<0.001). Dental anxiety immediately after tooth extraction may be influenced by operative techniques (type of anaesthesia, duration of operation, or position of tooth extracted), but anxiety at 7 days after extraction is not.

Are patients satisfied after peripheral nerve blockade? Results from an International Registry of Regional Anesthesia.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) is associated with superior outcomes compared with opioids; however, little is known regarding patients' perceptions of the care they have received. Patient satisfaction is emerging as an important indicator of quality of health care, and identifying deficiencies in discrete aspects of satisfaction may allow targeted interventions to improve quality. In this study, we analyze data relevant to patient satisfaction from the International Registry of Regional Anesthesia. The primary objective of this analysis was to report the results of a patient-satisfaction questionnaire and to determine predictors associated with unwillingness to have PNB repeated in the case of future surgery. METHODS: The questionnaire used in this study was derived from this registry's results and from previously validated questionnaires and addressed 3 domains of importance, namely, provision of information, pain, and interaction with the anesthesiologist. The 11-item written, multidimensional questionnaire was given to patients within 2 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was willingness to have PNB repeated in the event of future similar surgery. RESULTS: Data related to 9969 surgical procedures were collected between July 1, 2011, and March 31, 2013. The survey response rate was 61.6%. Most respondents-94.6% (95% confidence interval, 94.0%-95.1%)--stated that they were willing to have a repeat PNB. Ninety percent of respondents were satisfied or completely satisfied with the information provided about the nerve block, as well as the anesthesiologist-patient interaction. Patients who were dissatisfied with either of these domains (ie, information provision or professional interaction) were less willing to undergo repeat PNB, as were patients who reported significant pain during the nerve block procedure. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of survey respondents were willing to undergo repeat PNB in case of future surgery and were satisfied with their anesthetic care. Targeted interventions to improve quality of PNB should be aimed at improving comfort, information provision, and physician-patient interaction.

Pain related to mandibular block injections and its relationship with anxiety and previous experiences with dental anesthetics.

OBJECTIVE: Anesthetic injections should reassure patients with the prospect of painless treatment, but for some patients it is the main source of their fear. We investigated pain resulting from mandibular block injections in relation to anxiety and previous experience with receiving injections. STUDY DESIGN: Patients (n = 230) filled out questionnaires before oral surgery. They were then asked to raise their hand when they felt pain as a result of the injection. The injection was administered, and pain intensity (11-point numeric rating scale) and pain duration (in seconds) was measured. RESULTS: In general, patients expected (mean 4.2, SD 2.7) significantly more pain than they experienced (2.4 ± 2.2). About 8.3% of patients reported a score in the range of 7 to 10. On average, pain lasted for 6.2 seconds (range 1-24.5 s), ≈ 36% of patients raised their hand for ≤ 2 seconds, and 14.6% raised their hand for ≥ 10 seconds. Pain was significantly positively associated with anxiety and the way previous injections were experienced. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular block injections can be considered to be mildly painful, with pain lasting only a few seconds. The pain experience of a mandibular block seems only partly dependent on experienced anxiety and previous experiences with receiving injections.

Continuous at-home postoperative analgesia using a catheter in the case of hand surgery: preliminary study about 40 cases.

In hand surgery, ever since continuous at-home postoperative analgesia (CPA) was implemented, procedures which cause pain for more than 24h can now be performed in ambulatory surgery. The aim of our work was to study the feasibility of CPA. Our series comprised 40 patients with a mean age of 50 years. Twenty-four patients had an ASA score of 1 and 16 patients had an ASA score of 2. Indications were osteoarthritis and rheumatoid diseases. Three steps were involved: preoperative (patient screening and information), peroperative (placement of a peripheral nerve catheter through an axillary approach using an elastomeric device) and postoperative (at-home patient care provided by visiting nurses). Evaluation was rated using a CPA score (0 to 10) based on analgesia quality and network organization data. The global CPA score was 1.85. The quality of analgesia (2.6) scored less than the quality of organization (1.1). In the case of analgesia, sleep obtained the lowest score, followed by pain, and lastly, unwanted events. As far as organization was concerned, the network obtained the lowest score, followed by patient satisfaction, and lastly, patient information. Problems were encountered due to insufficient nurse training, analgesia failures, as well as unwanted events related to the oral antalgic treatment. However, technical success was almost always achieved. Our results show that the indications for ambulatory surgery could be extended and hospital-private practice networks be further developed. CPA appears to be a promising technique for analgesia and ambulatory surgery.

[External dacryocystorhinostomy under local anesthesia and sedation]. / Les dacryocystorhinostomies par voie externe sous anesthésie locale et sédation.

INTRODUCTION: External dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery is highly advantageous in that it can be performed under local anesthesia associated with sedation. We aimed at verifying the efficiency of the anesthesia, studying the general behavior of the patient and the quality of the surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study of a local anesthetic protocol associated with sedation was conducted in our Oculoplastic Department on 34 patients (71.5+/-8.3 years of age) between may 2007 and march 2008. The anesthetic protocol consisted of blocking four nerves based on the analysis of the anatomy of facial innervation. The including criteria were patient antecedents such as arterial hypertension, cardiac or lung problems, diabetes, and no contraindications for local anesthesia. The hemodynamic constants, variability of the Ramsay score, and complications such as bleeding or pain were studied. The progress of the surgery was simultaneously evaluated by the patients, anesthesiologists, and surgeons. RESULTS: Both the hemodynamic constants and the Ramsay score remained stable intra- and postoperatively. In addition, the visual analog scale (VAS) scores remained low. Both surgeon and patient satisfaction was excellent (88.4 % of the patients declared that they were ready to choose the same anesthetic protocol if new surgery were to be performed). The surgery's success rate was 79.3 % (no watering at 3 months) versus 82 % for the patients operated under general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: The protocol of local anesthesia associated with sedation for external DCR is therefore safe and efficient.

Comparison of methods of local anaesthesia used for cataract extraction.

This paper will discuss the various techniques used for the instillation of local anaesthetics (LA) during intraocular (10) cataract extraction. It will be limited to a comparison of peribulbar block, sub-Tenons block and topical plus intracameral anaesthesia alone, as these are those most frequently used at the author's place of work. It will focus on both the surgeons' preferences and the patients' perceptions and comfort pre-, peri- and postoperatively. A description of each technique and the drugs available will be followed with a discussion of the patients' perceptions and pain levels. Included will be a summary of the patients' anxiety levels and the benefits of any sedation. Throughout, general and specific complications will be debated. All will be supported by current, relevant literature.

Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Two commonly used methods of digital nerve block with local anesthetic are the two-injection dorsal technique and the single-injection volar subcutaneous technique. The authors compared these two digital block techniques with respect to local anesthetic injection pain and recipient preference of anesthetic technique. METHODS: Twenty-seven volunteers had the long finger of each hand injected with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The two-injection dorsal method was used on one long finger and the other long finger received the volar single-injection technique. Volunteers completed a pain scale for each block and were then asked which technique they would prefer. The area of anesthetic skin was assessed in each finger by pinprick testing, and photographs were taken. RESULTS: Although there was a lower pain score for the volar single-injection block, the difference in pain scores between the two techniques was not statistically significant. However, 22 of the 27 subjects indicated that they would select the volar over the dorsal block if a future block was required, and this preference for the volar block was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference in pain scores between the two techniques was not statistically significant, volunteers who received both blocks would prefer the volar single-injection subcutaneous block if given a choice. Therefore, the single-injection volar subcutaneous block is recommended as the technique of choice for anesthesia of the digit, except in patients for whom anesthesia over the dorsum of the proximal phalanx is required. These patients may prefer a supplementary dorsal nerve block or a traditional two-injection block.

Bradycardia and hypertension in anticipation of, and exacerbated by, peribulbar block: a prospective audit.

BACKGROUND: Changes in heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) occur in anticipation of, and following, injection of a peribulbar local analgesic agent. We examined these changes in two groups of awake patients given a pre-medication of either hydroxyzine 1.0 mg/kg alone (control) or hydroxyzine 1.0 mg/kg with morphine 0.05 mg/kg. METHODS: HR, SAP and DAP of 100 patients per group were monitored the day before surgery (baseline), every 5 min in the anesthesia holding room before peribulbar injection, every minute for the first 5 min after peribulbar injection and then every 5 min until transfer to the operating room. Within and between pre-medication group values of HR, SAP and DAP before and after peribulbar injection were compared with baseline. RESULTS: The two groups of patients were similar. Before peribulbar injection, HR was unchanged in the hydroxyzine group, but 6% slower in those given morphine (P<0.01). After injection, HR slowed in both groups, by 5% and 7% (P<0.01, both comparisons), respectively. In anticipation of injection, SAP increased in both groups to 20% and 16% above baseline, respectively, and increased further after injection to 26% and 24% above baseline, respectively (P<0.001, all comparisons). In both groups, maximum SAP following injection exceeded maximum SAP before injection (P<0.02, both comparisons). DAP increased by 4% (P<0.05) in the hydroxyzine group before injection, and by 5% and 4%, respectively (P<0.005 and P<0.05, respectively) after peribulbar injection. CONCLUSION: The audit reveals pronounced increases in SAP accompanied by lesser increases in DAP and a tendency to slowing of HR in awake patients in anticipation of peribulbar injections. Peribulbar injections cause further increases in blood pressure and mild bradycardia. These changes occur similarly in patients pre-medicated with hydroxyzine or hydroxyzine plus morphine. A mix of neuro-humoral influences (anxiety/catecholamine/baroreceptor/trigemino-vagal) are postulated as etiological.

The addition of clonidine to bupivacaine in combined femoral-sciatic nerve block for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Clonidine has been shown to prolong sensory analgesia when given as an adjunct to peripheral nerve blocks but has not been evaluated when given in conjunction with a femoral-sciatic nerve block. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether the addition of clonidine to a femoral-sciatic nerve block would prolong the duration of sensory analgesia in groups of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This prospective, randomized, double-blind investigation was performed on 64 subjects undergoing ACL reconstruction. Patients were assigned randomly to receive a femoral-sciatic nerve block using 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (control group) or 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 1 microg/kg of clonidine (experimental group). Variables measured included demographics, timed pain intensity measurements, postoperative analgesic consumption, duration of analgesia, and patient satisfaction. No significant differences were noted between groups for pain intensity scores, duration of sensory analgesia, postoperative analgesic requirements, or overall patient satisfaction. Both groups reported minimal amounts of postoperative pain and high analgesic satisfaction scores. Based on our results, we do not recommend the addition of clonidine to a femoral-sciatic nerve block when given to facilitate postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction.

Therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of traumatically induced cervical spondylotic radicular pain.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes resulting from the use of fluoroscopically guided therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of traumatically induced cervical spondylotic radicular pain. DESIGN: Retrospective study with independent clinical review. A total of 15 patients who met specific physical examination or electrodiagnostic criteria and failed to improve clinically after at least 4 wks of physical therapy were included. Each patient demonstrated a positive response to a fluoroscopically guided cervical selective nerve root block. Therapeutic selective nerve root blocks were administered in conjunction with physical therapy. Outcome measures included visual analog scale pain scores, employment status, medication usage, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Patients' symptom duration before diagnostic injection averaged 13.0 mos. An average of 3.7 therapeutic injections were administered. Follow-up data collection transpired at an average of 20.7 mos after discharge from treatment. An overall good or excellent outcome was observed in three patients (20.0%). Among those treated without surgery, a significant reduction (P = 0.0313) in pain score was observed at the time of follow-up. Six patients (40.0%) proceeded to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These initial and preliminary findings do not support the use of therapeutic selective nerve root block in the treatment of this challenging patient population with traumatically induced spondylotic radicular pain.

Patients' experiences with multiple stimulation axillary block for fast-track ambulatory hand surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory axillary block by multiple nerve stimulation (MNS) is effective and time efficient, but may be rejected by patients because of block pain. This prospective study assessed patients' anxiety and acceptance of this block, identified which of the components of blocking procedure is most painful (i.v. line insertion, repeated needle passes, local anesthetic injection, or electrical stimulation) and recorded patients' anesthetic preferences for the future hand surgery. METHODS: Upon arrival at the day unit, 100 unpremedicated adult patients without previous experience of peripheral nerve stimulation indicated on the visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100) their anxiety about the block. The blocking procedure was then explained step-by-step. After inserting the i.v. line and freezing the skin in axilla, four terminal nerves (musculocutaneous, median, ulnar, radial) were electrolocated using an initial current of 2 mA and a target current of 0.1-0.5 mA. Pain caused by the individual components of blocking procedure was assessed on VAS before the start of surgery. On the day after the operation, the patients reassessed their anxiety for the next axillary block and indicated which anesthetic method (block alone, block plus sedation, or general anesthesia) they would prefer for the future hand surgery. RESULTS: Before the block, 59 patients admitted being anxious about regional block (median anxiety VAS=27), compared with 42 patients (anxiety VAS=10) postoperatively: P<0.01. Median intensity of electrical stimulation pain was significantly higher (VAS=16) than pain of local anesthetic injections (VAS=8), i.v. line insertion (VAS=6) and multiple needle passes (VAS=5). However, only 53 patients categorized electrolocation as painful. Twenty-seven reported discomfort but not pain, and 20 patients described the sensation as 'funny' or 'strange'. None of the patients had surgical pain during operation. Mean duration of surgery was 77 min, and of hospital stay 166 min. Ninety-eight patients would choose the same block for the future hand surgery, 13 of which would like sedation before the block, and two patients did not wish to be awake during any surgery. Ninety-five patients were satisfied with fast-tracking. CONCLUSIONS: Fear of block pain is diminished after experiencing the blocking procedure. Electrical stimuli was perceived as painful by 53% of patients, and this pain was more intense than with other block components. The majority of our patients would choose axillary block without sedation for future hand surgery and are satisfied with fast-tracking.

Local infiltration and spermatic cord block for inguinal, scrotal and testicular surgery.

This was a prospective study involving 372 male patients. Surgical procedures including simple inguinal hernia repair, inguinal lymph node biopsy, hydrocelectomy, testicular biopsy, testicular fixation, orchidectomy and scrotal exploration were performed under local anaesthesia using various quantities of 0.5% xylocaine with adrenaline depending on the procedure, in the form of spermatic cord block and local infiltration nerve blocks. No premedication was given to any patient and only five patients (1.34%) were given intraoperative sedation due to anxiety. No complication directly attributed to the anaesthetic agent used or the technique of spermatic cord and nerve blocks were reported during the study. Three hundred and sixty patients (96.77%) were operated on as outpatients and were happy and satisfied to return home on the same day. This experience confirms that spermatic cord block accompanied by local infiltration with 0.5% xylocaine with adrenaline is simple, safe and effective technique that should be used more widely in outpatient urological and general surgical settings in this locality. It provides excellent intra-scrotal and inguinal anaesthesia. Furthermore, the technique is cost effective, and personnel effective since no anaesthetist is required for the procedure which is usually carried out by the surgeon. This would enable many more people to afford the surgical procedures.