Effectiveness of Orthotic Treatment on Clinical Outcomes of the Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Under Different Wearing Compliance Levels: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Wearing spinal orthosis for 16 to 23 hours a day during the teenage years could be challenging and stressful for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The investigation of clinical outcomes under various orthosis-wearing compliances can provide helpful insight into orthotic treatment dosage. This systematic review aims to investigate actual orthosis-wearing compliance and evaluate the effectiveness of orthotic treatment in controlling scoliotic curvature and preventing surgery for patients with AIS under various levels of orthosis-wearing compliance. METHODS: A literature search of 7 electronic databases, namely PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, and Embase, was conducted on May 19, 2023. Participant characteristics, orthotic treatment protocols, compliance information, outcome measures, and key findings were extracted. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scales were used to evaluate the quality of included cohort and case-control studies. RESULTS: This study systematically reviewed 17 of 1,799 identified studies, including 1,981 subjects. The actual compliance was inconsistent and ranged from 7.0 to 18.8 hours daily. The proportion of compliant subjects in each study varied from 16.0% to 78.6% due to the heterogeneity of calculation period, measurement methods, and orthosis prescription time. Thirteen studies were investigated to determine the effectiveness of orthotic treatment in controlling curve deformity under different compliance groups, and 2 studies compared the compliance under different treatment outcomes. The rate of curve progression, defined as surpassing the measurement error threshold of 5° or 6° after orthotic treatment, varied from 1.8% to 91.7% across the studies. Ten studies defined the treatment failure, surgery, or surgery indication as Cobb angle progressing to a certain degree (e.g., 40°, 45°, or 50°) and reported failure/surgery/surgery indication rates ranging from 0.0% to 91.7% among different compliance level groups. CONCLUSION: This review found that the actual compliance with orthotic treatment was generally lower than the prescribed wearing time and exhibited wide variation among different studies. The electronic compliance monitors show promise in regular orthotic treatment practice. More importantly, the group with higher and consistent compliance has significantly less curve progression and lower surgery or failure rate than the group with lower and inconsistent compliance. Further studies are proposed to investigate the minimal orthosis-wearing compliance in patients with AIS treated with different types of orthoses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Systematic Review. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A systematic review on management and outcome of irreducible knee dislocations.

BACKGROUND: Irreducible knee dislocations (IKD) are rare and can often be missed or misdiagnosed. The incidence of knee dislocation is quoted between 0.01% and 0.2% of all orthopaedic injuries, with up to 4% of these dislocations sub-classified as irreducible. The primary aim of this systematic review was to analyse cases of IKD described in the literature, with a secondary aim of producing a streamlined approach for managing these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 1st September 2021 in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines using the online databases Medline and EMBASE. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Case reports or clinical studies or reporting on IKD were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool and Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 60 studies eligible for inclusion, giving a total of 114 cases of IKD. Posterolateral dislocation was most common, seen in 85% of cases. The dimple sign was present in 70%. All cases required surgical intervention to achieve joint reduction. The most commonly involved structure blocking reduction was the medial collateral ligament (MCL)±medial structures, seen in 52.4%. MCL reconstruction or repair was carried out in 32.3% cases. The overall incidence of neurovascular injury was 9% and the overall complication rate was 14.4%. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this SR we conclude that: the most common type of IKDs are PL dislocations, and the MCL, medial retinaculum and capsule and vastus medialis oblique form the most common structures involved in block to reduction and often will require open reduction and repair in acute setting if arthroscopic reduction fails. The most common pattern of injury to ligament is likely to be ACL, PCL, MCL±other structures but the MCL will be the most commonly repaired ligament. The dimple sign is often present and is highly pathognomonic of IKD. The incidence of neurovascular injury is uncommon. The most common post-operative complications likely to be encountered is medial skin necrosis and postoperative knee stiffness. Therefore, patients should be mobilised as early as possible with ROM in hinge brace. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Prospective clinical results of an additive ligament bracing for stabilizing simple and complex elbow instabilities.

INTRODUCTION: Ligament bracing augments ligament repair using a non-absorbable suture tape. Although biomechanically an increase in primary stability has been proven, there is a lack of clinical evidence. Purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical results of patients treated with ligament bracing due to primary elbow instability, including an analysis of complications. Furthermore, clinical results for patients treated with and without early functional mobilization were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective case-series evaluated clinical and functional results from patients treated with ligament bracing due to primary elbow instability. Clinical outcome measures were range of motion (ROM) as well as objective and subjective elbow scores [Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS); Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH score)]. Stability was evaluated sonographically by humero-radial gapping under varus stress. RESULTS: This study involved 34 patients treated with ligament bracing. After a mean follow-up of 12.9 months ROM was 112° ± 29, MEPS 88 ± 13 points, DASH 91 ± 11 points, and 84% were satisfied with their result. Lateral joint gapping was 2.4 mm. No significant difference was observed regarding a postoperative mobilization with and without limitations. Most common complication after ligament bracing was elbow stiffness including heterotopic ossifications in four patients (12%). CONCLUSION: Operatively treated elbow instability with additional ligament bracing results in good clinical outcomes with high patient satisfaction and recovery of elbow stability. The high primary stability of the ligament bracing allows early functional mobilization without bracing, which facilitates postoperative rehabilitation. Elbow stiffness with heterotopic ossification seems to be a potential complication. Furthermore, the optimal tensioning of the ligament bracing remains challenging, including the risk of an over tensioning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department With Ankle Fractures: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Temporary lower limb immobilization may be a risk for venous thromboembolism. The purpose of this study was to examine the 90-day incidence of venous thromboembolism among patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with ankle fractures requiring temporary immobilization. Secondary objectives were to examine individual factors associated with venous thromboembolism in this population and to compare the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with ankle fractures against a priori-selected control groups. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using province-wide health datasets from Ontario, Canada. We included patients aged 16 years and older discharged from an ED between 2013 and 2018 with closed ankle fractures requiring temporary immobilization. We estimated 90-day incidence of venous thromboembolism after ankle fracture. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism, censoring at 90 days or death. Patients with ankle fractures were then propensity score matched to 2 control groups: patients discharged with injuries not requiring lower limb immobilization (ie, finger wounds and wrist fractures) to compare relative hazard of venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: There were 86,081 eligible patients with ankle fractures. Incidence of venous thromboembolism within 90 days was 1.3%. Factors associated with venous thromboembolism were older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.39), venous thromboembolism or superficial venous thrombosis history (HR: 5.18; 95% CI: 4.33 to 6.20), recent hospital admission (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.68), recent nonankle fracture surgery (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.93), and subsequent surgery for ankle fracture (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.20). In the matched cohort, patients with ankle fractures had an increased hazard of venous thromboembolism compared to matched controls with finger wounds (HR: 6.31; 95% CI: 5.30 to 7.52) and wrist fractures (HR: 5.68; 95% CI: 4.71 to 6.85). CONCLUSION: The 90-day incidence of venous thromboembolism among patients discharged from the ED with ankle fractures requiring immobilization was 1.3%. These patients had a 5.7- to 6.3-fold increased hazard compared to matched controls. Certain patients immobilized for ankle fractures are at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, and this should be recognized by emergency physicians.

Brachial Plexus Palsy Because of Pavlik Harness Use: A Case Report.

CASE: A 2.5-month-old girl with bilateral hip dysplasia presented for orthopaedic evaluation and began treatment with a Pavlik harness. One month after the initiation of treatment, decreased use of the left upper extremity was noted, which was consistent with a brachial plexus palsy. The Pavlik harness was discontinued, and upper extremity function fully recovered within 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The Pavlik harness is an effective treatment for hip dysplasia with a low-risk profile. This case serves to remind clinicians of the risk for upper extremity traction injury when a Pavlik harness is used in patients who are large for their chronological age.

Effectiveness of Compressive External Bracing in Patients with Flexible Pectus Carinatum Deformity: A Review.

There has been a growing interest in the nonoperative treatment of chest wall deformities over the last few decades; with the advent of external compressive orthotics, similar outcomes have been reported compared with surgical intervention. There have been fewer major complications reported with dynamic compression bracing on the chest wall; however, the Achilles heel of this approach still lies with treatment tolerability and compliance. A Medline literature search was undertaken to evaluate the evidence concerning the techniques, modifications, and outcomes associated with external compressive bracing in the setting of pectus carinatum. Sixteen articles were integrated after literature review and data were collected on methods of assessing pectus carinatum (degree of severity as well as type), patient selection protocol (i.e., suitability for external compressive bracing), the bracing protocol itself, duration of treatment, metrics used to assess outcome, and success, compliance, and dropout rate, and length of long-term follow-up. Compressive external bracing appears to be a safe and well tolerated nonsurgical treatment option for young patients with flexible pectus carinatum deformities. However, there is still a need for robust level I randomized data from multiple centers with a clearly standardized bracing protocol, objective measurement of outcomes, and recording of results at the end of the bracing treatment program in sufficiently powered sample sizes over a significant follow-up period.

Associated Morbidity After the Percutaneous Release of the Medial Collateral Ligament for Knee Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To summarize available data on the morbidity associated with percutaneous release of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the knee during arthroscopy via a "pie-crusting" technique. METHODS: A search of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases to identify studies examining the morbidity of percutaneous MCL release during arthroscopy. Only English-language articles were included; technical articles and studies not focused on the use of this technique were omitted. Two independent reviewers performed the literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment. The outcomes analyzed included resultant knee instability, functional outcome scores, visual analog scale pain scores, and saphenous nerve or greater saphenous vein injury. RESULTS: Six studies met the eligibility criteria. The studies included a total of 234 knees undergoing MCL release, with a mean patient age of 41.1 years. This MCL release typically generated grade I MCL laxity, which usually diminished or resolved over time and did not require brace application. The functional outcome scores of patients undergoing MCL release did not differ from those of patients undergoing the same procedure without MCL release. Postoperative pain was not significantly different between patients who underwent MCL release and those who did not. There was a 0% incidence of injury to the saphenous nerve or greater saphenous vein with MCL release in the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous MCL release during knee arthroscopy is a method of increasing the medial tibiofemoral joint space without causing any significant short- or long-term complications including residual valgus instability, pain, loss of function, or damage to surrounding structures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Skeletally Immature Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves 15°-24° Are at High Risk for Progression.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curve progression and brace prescription in skeletally immature patients (Risser 0 to Risser 1) with curves 15°-24°. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many skeletally immature patients with mild AIS ask about the likelihood of curve progression. No studies have answered these questions. METHODS: The charts and radiographs of 302 consecutive patients with curves 15°-24° at initial visit, Risser 0 to Risser 1, were reviewed until skeletal maturity (≥Risser 4) or surgery. Curves averaged 19.1° ± 2.9° at initial visit. The Risser grade was 0 in 247 patients (82%) and 1 in 55 patients (18%). Patients who were Risser 0 were compared with those who were Risser 1, curves 15°-19° were compared with curves 20°-24°. RESULTS: The majority of patients demonstrated curve progression ≥5° (65%). Patients who were Risser 0 did not progress significantly more than patients who were Risser 1 (10° vs. 8°) (p = .22). Patients with curves 20°-24° did not progress significantly more than patients with curves 15°-19° (10° vs. 9°) (p = .65). CONCLUSIONS: Curve progression for small curves (15°-19°) is similar to curves between 20° and 24°. Close observation or perhaps early intervention for these patients is necessary. These data may suggest a paradigm shift to earlier brace initiation and call for early treatment in small curves. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Vertebra-disc ratio as a new predictor for curve progression in early thoracic AIS with bracing treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have reported various predictors for curve progression in braced adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. However, the reported predictors might be insufficient for patients with early AIS. The aim was to investigate whether the initial vertebra-disc ratio (VDR) could serve as an effective predictor for curve progression in early thoracic AIS (premenarchal and Risser 0) undergoing brace treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study reviewed a consecutive series of early thoracic AIS girls with thoracic curve. All patients had accepted brace treatment and had regular follow-up. According to the bracing outcomes, patients were divided into two groups: Group P (progressed, curve progressed over six degrees or indicated for surgery) and Group NP (non-progressed). RESULTS: Totally 203 girls were included. There were 73 and 130 patients in Groups P and NP, respectively. The patients in Group P had greater initial VDR (1.9 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.4, P < 0.01) than Group NP. During the follow-up, it showed continuous higher values in Group P than Group NP. The logistic regression analysis revealed that initial VDR had an effective value for predicting curve progression in the braced early AIS girls. The ideal cut-off point of initial VDR was 1.5 for the prediction of curve progression. CONCLUSION: The initial VDR could serve as an effective predictor for curve progression in braced early AIS girls. Evaluation of this new parameter should be carefully performed at the bracing initiation.

Complications of Halo Placement.

BACKGROUND: The halo vest is widely used throughout the world to manage craniovertebral and cervical instabilities. It can be used for postoperative immobilization or as an alternative to surgical fixation. METHOD: In this paper we present some cases of severe complications from our own practice and review the literature on halo complications. RESULTS: Like any therapeutic manoeuvre, halo placement may be followed by various complications. In the meantime, modern techniques of fixation offer safe and immediate stabilization. CONCLUSION: The halo vest remains a formidable method for cervical immobilization. However, it should not be used a priori instead of surgery.

Effect of the Chêneau Brace in the Natural History of Moderate Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Girls: Cohort Analysis of a Selected Homogenous Population of 100 Consecutive Skeletally Immature Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Α series study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationships between the effectiveness of brace in reduction of scoliosis angle, axial trunk rotation (ATR), and patients' compliance, in skeletally immature females with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), treated with Chêneau brace for a minimum of three years. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: According to some authors, braces are ineffective, whereas others find that braces stop scoliosis progression and that the outcome has been related to patient's compliance. METHODS: From the 100 patients who were initially recruited, 88 patients were included in the final analysis. The average ± SD primary scoliosis angle before brace application was 36.8° ± 9.9°, 32.7° ± 6.3°, and 33.5° ± 11.5° for major thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar curvatures, respectively. All patients were aged ≥10 years at treatment initiation, and their Risser index varied from 0 to II. Eighty-eight patients were followed for at least three years with brace treatment, whereas 43 patients were reevaluated 31 ± 7 months after brace weaning. In baseline and while in brace, the scoliosis Cobb angle, Risser index, menarche age, ATR, and patient's compliance were recorded. RESULTS: In the 88 patients, the brace reduced the major thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar scoliosis one month after brace onset while "in brace" to 26° ± 11° (29% ± 18%, p = .0006), 23° ± 8° (31% ± 20%, p = .00001), and 24° ± 11° (34% ± 21%, p = .00043), respectively; thereafter, no significant decrease of the curves was recorded. Total bracing time averaged at 45 ± 19 months (range 36-96) and brace weaning averaged at 17 ± 2 years (range 15-19). Six of the 88 (6.8%) individuals underwent surgery for scoliosis progression. In the 43 patients who were reevaluated 31 ± 7 months after brace weaning, scoliosis angle and ATR increased insignificantly, compared to the three years' values. CONCLUSIONS: Chêneau orthosis reduced while "in brace" AIS in girls with sufficient compliance, with a low rate (6.8%) of patients who underwent surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Bracing Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion is not Necessary for Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized trial. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of bracing following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Bracing following spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disease is common. However, the necessity of postoperative bracing is still controversial. A paucity of high-quality studies have assessed the efficacy of bracing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 90 patients with degenerative lumbar disease receiving instrumented TLIF were randomly assigned to brace and no brace groups for postoperative care. Patients in the brace group were instructed to wear a rigid brace full-time for 12 weeks. Patients in the no brace group were instructed to wear a soft corset for 2 weeks, after which it was weaned off. In all patients, the Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were evaluated preoperatively; postoperatively; and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. The fusion rates, complications, and reoperation rates were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 44 patients were assigned to the brace group (mean age, 69.2±10.7 y), and 46 were assigned to the no brace group (mean age, 68.8±11.9 y). All patients received at least 12 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to patient demographic characteristics. The Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores at each follow-up were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The fusion rate and complications at the 12-month postoperative follow-up were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that in patients with degenerative spinal disease who receive TLIF, wearing a rigid brace postoperatively is unnecessary. In addition, the fusion rate was not related to bracing, and there were no complications or reoperations whether a brace was worn. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-therapeutic.

Joint hyperlaxity prevents relapses in clubfeet treated by Ponseti method-preliminary results.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of joint hyperlaxity (by Beighton score) as a protective factor for clubfoot relapse. METHODS: Patients with idiopathic clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method between January 2004 and December 2012, without other congenital foot deformity, and not previously treated by open surgery were included in either the Relapse group (n = 23) if it was a clubfoot relapse or the Control group (n = 19) if no relapse was noted. Joint laxity was evaluated using the Beighton score at the latest follow-up against the Normal group (n = 22, children matched by sex and age without clubfoot deformity). RESULTS: We found a significantly higher joint laxity in the Control group (4.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-7.06) as compared to the Relapse (3.17, 95% CI: 1.53-4.81, p = 0.032) and Normal (3.14, 95% CI: 1.78-4.5, p = 0.03) groups. The univariate logistic regression showed a 5.28-times increase in the risk of relapse for a Beighton score lower than 4/9 points (odds ratio = 5.28; 95% CI = 1.29-21.5; p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Joint hyperlaxity could be a protective factor for clubfoot relapse.

Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Importance: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), a spinal curvature of 10° or more, is the most common form of scoliosis, with a prevalence of 1% to 3%. Curves progress in approximately two-thirds of patients with AIS before skeletal maturity, and large curves (>50°) may be associated with adverse health outcomes. Objective: To systematically review evidence on benefits and harms of AIS screening for the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Data Sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, ERIC, PubMed, CINAHL, and relevant systematic reviews were searched for studies published from January 1966 to October 20, 2016; studies included in a previous USPSTF report were also reviewed. Surveillance was conducted through July 24, 2017. Study Selection: Fair- and good-quality studies that evaluated the accuracy of screening children and adolescents aged 10 to 18 years for AIS, the benefits of AIS treatment, the harms of AIS screening or treatment, or long-term health outcomes. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles and extracted data into evidence tables. Results were qualitatively summarized. Main Outcomes and Measures: Health outcomes and spinal curvature in adolescence and adulthood, accuracy of screening for AIS, any harm of AIS screening or treatment. Results: Fourteen studies (N = 448 276) in 26 articles were included. Accuracy of AIS screening was highest (93.8% sensitivity; 99.2% specificity) in a cohort study of a clinic-based program using forward bend test, scoliometer, and Moiré topography screening (n = 306 082); accuracy was lower in cohort studies of 6 programs using fewer modalities (n = 141 161). Four controlled studies (n = 587) found evidence for benefit of bracing on curve progression compared with controls. A randomized clinical trial and a nonrandomized trial of exercise treatment (N = 184) found favorable reductions in Cobb angle of 0.67° to 4.9° in the intervention group compared with increases of 1.38° to 2.8° in the control group. Two cohort studies (n = 339) on long-term outcomes found that braced participants reported more negative treatment experience and body appearance compared with surgically treated or untreated participants. A study that combined a randomized clinical trial and cohort design (n = 242) reported harms of bracing, which included skin problems on the trunk and nonback body pains. There was no evidence on the effect of AIS screening on adult health outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Screening can detect AIS. Bracing and possibly exercise treatment can interrupt or slow progression of curvature in adolescence. However, there is little or no evidence on long-term outcomes for AIS treated in adolescence, the association between curvature at skeletal maturity and adult health outcomes, the harms of AIS screening or treatment, or the effect of AIS screening on adult health outcomes.

Efficacy, safety, and economics of bracing after spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Bracing is often used after spinal surgery to immobilize the spine, improve fusion, and relieve pain. However, controversy exists regarding the efficacy, necessity, and safety of various bracing techniques in the postsurgical setting. PURPOSE: In this systematic review, we aimed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of postoperative bracing versus no postoperative bracing after spinal surgery in patients with several common operative spinal pathologies. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A systematic review was carried out to compare postoperative bracing and no postoperative bracing. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library from 1970 to May 2017, supplemented by manual searching of the reference list of relevant studies and previously published reviews. Studies were included if they compared disability, quality of life, functional impairment, radiographic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, or complications between patients treated with postoperative bracing and patients not receiving any postoperative bracing. Each article was critically appraised independently by two reviewers, and the overall body of evidence was rated using guidelines outlined by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. RESULTS: Of the 858 retrieved citations, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, consisting of 4 randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective cohort study. Low to moderate evidence suggests that there are no significant differences in most measures of disability, pain, quality of life, functional impairment, radiographic outcomes, and safety between groups. Isolated studies reported statistically significant and inconsistent differences between groups with respect to Neck Disability Index at 6 weeks postoperatively or Short Form-36 Physical Component Score at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on limited evidence, postoperative bracing does not result in improved outcomes after spinal surgery. Future high-quality randomized trials will be required to confirm these findings.

Comparison of the Memory Foam Pad Versus the Bean Bag with Shoulder Braces in Preventing Patient Displacement during Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the amount of patient displacement when a memory foam pad is used versus a bean bag with shoulder braces. The secondary aim was to evaluate for postoperative extremity symptoms including pain, numbness, and weakness. DESIGN: A prospective randomized pilot study (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: A single academic institution. PATIENTS: Women ≥18 years of age undergoing laparoscopic or robotic gynecologic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to be positioned on the memory foam pad (group A) or the bean bag with shoulder braces (group B) preoperatively. The patients' positions were measured before and after the procedure, and the displacement was recorded. Patients were followed postoperatively and questioned regarding upper extremity or lower extremity weakness, numbness, and pain. Demographic characteristics were collected using the electronic medical record. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included in the study (22 in group A and 21 in group B). The demographic and intraoperative characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups. The patients in group A moved a mean distance of 3.80 ± 3.32 cm, whereas those in group B moved a mean distance of 1.07 ± 1.93 cm (p = .002). A Pearson correlation coefficient did not yield a correlation between patient displacement and age, body mass index, length of surgery, or pathology weight. In group A, 2 patients had lower extremity numbness, and 1 patient had upper extremity numbness. In group B, 1 patient had upper extremity pain, and 1 patient had both upper and lower extremity numbness. These patients had complete resolution of their symptoms within the first 2 weeks postoperatively, with the exception of 1 patient in group A whose lower extremity numbness resolved 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Positioning patients on the bean bag with shoulder braces resulted in significantly less displacement during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery when compared with the memory foam pad. All postoperative extremity numbness, weakness, and pain were temporary and resolved completely in our cohort. A larger study would be necessary to determine the true incidence of peripheral nerve injuries because these are rare complications of laparoscopic surgeries.

Time in brace: where are the limits and how can we improve compliance and reduce negative psychosocial impact in patients with scoliosis? A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is generally prescribed for 18-23 hours per day, but the minimal time of brace wear per day to stop progression of AIS is still unclear. Compliance of patients with AIS with brace treatment is reported to be between 27% and 47% of the prescribed time, brace wear especially at school is often described as embarrassing by adolescent patients. It has been reported that a higher rate of compliance leads to a significantly lower rate of curve progression. Theoretically, prescribing brace treatment 16 hours instead of 23 hours per day (patients are allowed to attend school free of their brace) could lead to a higher rate of compliance, and subsequently reduce progression rate of patients with AIS. PURPOSE: To investigate if brace treatment 16 hours per day is noninferior to >16 hours with regard to curve progression, and if other clinical and demographic factors that might influence incidence and progression (apart from time of brace wear) of AIS can be identified. STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective study, we investigated patients with AIS who had been admitted to our outpatient clinic and enrolled them in one of three groups: group 1 brace <12 hours per day, group 2 brace 12-16 hours per day, and group 3 brace >16 hours per day. PATIENT SAMPLE: Seventy-two patients met our inclusion criteria and were enrolled in our study, 61 female and 11 male patients. Twenty-eight were allocated in group 1, 13 in group 2, and 25 in group 3. OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression of Cobb angle with regard to brace wear per day was the main outcome measure. METHODS: Skeletally immature patients who presented from October 2010 to June 2013 with an AIS and a Cobb angle >20° were enrolled in our study and have been prescribed a Chêneau orthesis. Demographic parameters, progression of Cobb angle, and time of brace wear have been recorded. Groups 1, 2, and 3 of brace wear were analyzed for differences. RESULTS: The overall difference between the groups referring to increase of Cobb angle was significant (p<.05). Further analysis of groups 2 and 3 showed that the difference between these groups was not significant (p>.05). Apart from time of brace wear, no other factor showed any influence on curve progression. Smoking status of parents of our patients was significantly more often positive than in the general local population (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve to 16 hours of brace wear per day did not lead to a higher progression rate of AIS compared with more than 16 hours in our study group. Our analysis showed that smoking status of parents possibly contributes to the risk of developing AIS; however, we did not find an impact on progression of scoliosis.

The Dynamic Compression Brace for Pectus Carinatum: Intermediate Results in 286 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic brace compression is a novel treatment for patients with pectus carinatum. The dynamic compression system contains a device to measure the flexibility of the thoracic wall and regulate the pressure of the brace. METHODS: Patients referred to our pediatric surgical center were screened for treatment with the dynamic compression brace. Patients with a pressure of initial correction (PIC) of 10.0 pounds per square inch or less were offered treatment with the brace. Patients with a PIC above 10.0 pounds per square inch were offered surgical correction. Between March 2013 and April 2016, 286 patients were treated with the brace; 260 were male (91%) and 26 were female (9%). Their mean age was 14 years (range, 4 to 21 years). RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients completed brace treatment; the mean treatment time was 14 months. Twenty-seven patients abandoned treatment because of lack of motivation, loss to follow-up, persistent protrusion of the sternal bone or flaring that required surgical correction, failure of treatment because of a bifid rib, fear of locking the brace, and delayed correction. One hundred eighty-one patients are still wearing the brace, either in the active or in the retainer phase. Patients with a high PIC also showed improvement when they were compliant. Adverse events were minor and included skin lesions (n = 4, 1%) and vasovagal reactions at the start of therapy (n = 3, 1%). CONCLUSIONS: These data show that brace therapy can be considered a valuable treatment option to correct pectus carinatum in patients with a flexible thorax.

Nail changes in casted and braced clubfoot: A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed at finding whether there are any nail changes specific to treatment in clubfoot. METHODS: Sixty new, 26 undergoing serial corrective casting, and 247 clubfoot patients using foot abduction braces were prospectively studied. The casted and braced group formed the basis of the study to observe nail changes, if any. The new patients and opposite normal foot (in unilateral casted cases) were taken as controls. OBSERVATIONS: Acute paronychia, ingrown toe nail, onychoshizia, onychorrhexis, nail plate concavity, latent onychomadesis, and distal onycholysis were observed in feet undergoing corrective casting and bracing. Micronychia, malalignment and thinning of nail plate were the observed congenital nail anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: Nail changes in clubfeet are not infrequent. Certain nail changes might be etiologically linked to casting and bracing. Some of nail changes might require urgent medical care.

Growing rod erosion through the lamina causing spinal cord compression in an 8-year-old girl with early-onset scoliosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Early-onset scoliosis often occurs by the age of 5 years and is attributed to many structural abnormalities. Syndromic early-onset scoliosis is considered one of the most aggressive types of early-onset scoliosis. Treatment starts with serial casting and bracing, but eventually most of these patients undergo growth-sparing procedures, such as a single growing rod, dual growing rods, or a vertical expandable titanium prosthetic rib. PURPOSE: This case report aimed to describe an unusual complication of erosion of a growing rod through the lamina that caused spinal cord compression in an 8-year-old girl with early-onset scoliosis. STUDY DESIGN: This is a case report. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was used to describe the clinical course and radiographic findings of this case after rod erosion into the spinal canal. RESULTS: The patient underwent successful revision surgery removing the rod without neurologic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with syndromic early-onset scoliosis are more prone to progressive curves and severe rotational deformity. We believe that the severe kyphotic deformity in addition to the dysplastic nature of the deformity in this population may predispose them to this unusual complication.