Hyperbaric bupivacaine versus prilocaine for spinal anesthesia combined with total intravenous anesthesia during oncological colon surgery in a 23-hour stay enhanced recovery protocol: A non-randomized study.

After the success of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, perioperative care has been further optimized in accelerated enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs), where optimal pain management is crucial. Spinal anesthesia was introduced as adjunct to general anesthesia to reduce postoperative pain and facilitate mobility. This study aimed to determine which spinal anesthetic agent provides best pain relief in accelerated ERP for colon carcinoma. This single center study was a secondary analysis conducted among patients included in the aCcelerated 23-Hour erAS care for colon surgEry study who underwent elective laparoscopic colon surgery. The first 30 patients included received total intravenous anesthesia combined with spinal anesthesia with prilocaine, the 30 patients subsequently included received spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Primary endpoint of this study was the total amount of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered during hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were amounts of MMEs administered in the recovery room and surgical ward, pain score using the numeric rating scale, complication rates and length of hospital stay. Compared to prilocaine, the total amount of MMEs administered was significantly lower in the bupivacaine group (n = 60, 16.3 vs 6.3, P = .049). Also, the amount of MMEs administered and median pain scores were significantly lower after intrathecal bupivacaine in the recovery room (MMEs 11.0 vs 0.0, P = .012 and numeric rating scale 2.0 vs 1.5, P = .004). On the surgical ward, median MMEs administered, and pain scores were comparable. Postoperative outcomes were similar in both groups. Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine was associated with less opioid use and better pain reduction immediately after surgery compared to prilocaine within an accelerated ERP for elective, oncological colon surgery.

Ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block versus interlaminar epidural block for analgesia in pediatric abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy and safety of epidural block (EB) are fairly high, complications such as inadvertent dural puncture may limit its use. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a relatively new regional technique that provides perioperative somatic and visceral analgesia for pediatric patients. This trial compared the quality of pain relief in pediatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery who received either QLB or EB. METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: Group E(n = 29): received EB; Group QL(n = 29): received QLB. Both groups were injected with 0.25% bupivacaine (0.5 ml/kg). Assessment of total analgesia consumption was the primary outcome measure, whereas the secondary outcome measures were assessment of postoperative analgesic effect by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and time of first analgesic request. RESULTS: Our study showed that the mean total fentanyl consumption was comparable between both groups(38.67 ± 5.02 and 36.47 ± 5.13 µg in the E and QL groups, respectively, P = 0.246). Only five patients did not require rescue analgesia (3 in the E group,2 in the QL group, P = 0.378). The mean duration of analgesia showed no significant difference between the two groups (9.9 ± 1.58 and 11.02 ± 1.74 h in the E and QL groups, respectively, P = 0.212). Evaluation of CHEOPS score values immediately in PACU and for the initial 24 h following operation showed no significant difference between the two study groups(P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: QLB can achieve analgesic effects comparable to those of EB as a crucial part of multimodal analgesia in children undergoing abdominal surgeries. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PACTR202203906027106.

A comparison of port-site infiltration with bupivacaine alone vs. bupivacaine plus dexemedetomidine after diagnostic staging laparoscopy.

Objectives: To compare the effects of bupivacaine alone and in combination with dexmedetomidine following staging laparoscopies. METHODS: This triple-blinded, prospective study was conducted from June to September 2021 at a tertiary care cancer hospital in Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised adult patients having American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade I-III, weighing >30kg and undergoing diagnostic staging laparoscopy. The subjects were randomised into two equal groups. Group A received 6ml of 2mg/kg bupivacaine at each of the four laparoscopic port sites before skin closure, while group B additionally received 2µg/kg dexmedetomidine. The presence and severity of pain were recorded and assessed at 15 min, 1, 2 and 4 hours as well as at the time of discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit. The time to first request for rescue analgesia, total morphine consumption, and the occurrence of any side effects during their stay were also recorded. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients, 15(50%) were in group A; 10(66.6%) males and 5(33.3%) females with mean age 43.27±7.59 years. There were 15(50%) patients in group B; 12(80%) males and 3(20%) females with mean age 41.36±12.42 years (p>0.05). Of the total, 29(96.66%) patients were classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade II, and 1(3.33%) patient in group A was grade III. There was no significant difference between the groups in any of the outcome measures assessed (p>0.05), and none of the patients experienced any side effect throughout the post-operative stay. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine had no significant improvement in pain relief compared to bupivacaine alone.

Effect of pre-incisional and peritoneal local anesthetics administration on colon anastomosis and wound healing.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that levobupivacaine is as effective as bupivacaine but carries a lower risk of cardiac and central nervous system toxicity. This study explores whether levobupivacaine and bupivacaine are preferable for all patients, includ-ing those with comorbidities, particularly focusing on their effects on colonic anastomosis. The primary objective is to examine the influence of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on colonic anastomosis. Additionally, the study will assess their impact on wound healing and their anti-adhesive properties. METHODS: Conducted between July 28, 2022, to August 4, 2022, at the Hamidiye Animal Experiments Laboratory, this study was approved by the University Science Health, Hamidiye Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee. This study was conducted using 21 male Sprague rats aged 16-20 weeks. The rats were allocated into three equal groups of seven each: Group C: pre-incisional isotonic; Group B: pre-incisional bupivacaine; and Group L: pre-incisional levobupivacaine. Macroscopic adhesion scores (MAS) were recorded during laparotomy and tissue samples were taken for histopathological examination and hydroxyproline levels measurement. Wound tensile strength along the middle incision line and anastomotic burst pressure were also assessed. RESULTS: MAS was statistically significantly lower in Groups B and L compared to Group C (p<0.001). The wound histopathology score (WHS) was significantly higher in Group L than in Group B (p=0.021). Colon histopathology scores (CHSs) were also signifi-cantly higher in Group L compared to Group C (p=0.011). CONCLUSION: TThe study found that bupivacaine and levobupivacaine did not significantly enhance wound healing, although le-vobupivacaine significantly improved WHS relative to bupivacaine. According to the findings of this study, levobupivacaine can enhance clinical practice by being used in patients undergoing colon anastomosis. It contributes significantly to the durability of colon anasto-mosis, has a more positive effect on wound healing compared to bupivacaine, and exhibits anti-adhesive properties. Additional clinical trials are necessary to validate these results further.

Administration of Low-dose Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in the Setting of Outpatient Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: With the rise of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), rapid motor and sensory recovery after anesthesia is crucial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose single-shot hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia (SA) for patients undergoing outpatient arthroplasty. METHODS: Data were reviewed from a single ASC from 2018 to 2020 for two arthroplasty-trained surgeons for all patients with primary arthroplasties that had administration of low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. Data collected from the ASC records were then further evaluated for total spinal block time, length of blockade, time to discharge criteria, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and time to discharge. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-seven patients undergoing 244 primary arthroplasties received SA with low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. The volume of 0.75% bupivacaine varied: 115 patients received 0.8 mL (6 mg), 111 patients received 1.0 mL (7.5 mg), and 17 patients received 1.2 mL (9 mg). Total SA time averaged 144 minutes with a mean of 30 minutes from post anesthesia care unit arrival to motor recovery. The mean time from post anesthesia care unit arrival to discharge criteria was 89 minutes. The average VAS at discharge was 1.44; the average VAS on POD1 was 3.0. No episodes of urinary retention and no reports of transient neurologic symptoms were noted in the study population. CONCLUSION: Low-dose, single-shot hyperbaric bupivacaine SA is an effective option in the ASC for arthroplasty, providing a fast return of motor function, facilitating rapid discharge, and is safe with a relatively low-risk profile.

Background factors for intra-operative hypotension during hip fracture repair surgery in the elderly under spinal anesthesia managed by orthopedic surgeons: A retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is used for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery, but frequently induces hypotension and the causative factors remain unclear. We examined background factors for the use of an intraoperative vasopressor in elderly patients receiving spinal anesthesia for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 203 patients >75 years (mean age, 87.9 years) with femoral trochanteric fractures who underwent short nail fixation under orthopedically managed spinal anesthesia at our hospital between April 2020 and July 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (intraoperative vasopressor) and group B (no vasopressor). The following data were compared: age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, antihypertensive medication, years of experience as a primary surgeon, bupivacaine dose, puncture level, anesthesia time, operation time, hemoglobin level and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio on the day of surgery, brain natriuretic peptide level, left ventricular ejection fraction, and percentage of patients operated on the day of transport. RESULTS: There were 65 patients in group A and 138 in group B. The average dose of bupivacaine was 11.7 mg. In a univariate analysis, group A was slightly younger (87.0 vs. 88.3 years), had a higher blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (27.1 vs. 24.5), more frequently received ß-blockers (14.1% vs. 5.8 %) and diuretic medications (21.9% vs. 11.6 %), and had a higher puncture level. A logistic regression analysis identified younger age (p = 0.02) and diuretic medication (p = 0.001) as independent risk factors in group A. Vasopressor use was more frequent at a higher puncture level in group A (57 % for L2/3, 33 % for L3/4, 15 % for L4/5, 0 % for L5/S). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension is attributed to volume deficit or extensive sympathetic blockade and may be prevented by avoiding high puncture levels and increasing preoperative fluid supplementation in patients on diuretics. There is currently no consensus on anesthetic dosages.

Regional analgesia using ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block versus cervical erector spinae block for anterior cervical spine surgery: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Regional analgesia techniques are crucial for pain management after cervical spine surgeries. Anesthesiologists strive to select the most effective and least hazardous regional analgesia technique for the cervical region. Our hypothesis is that an intermediate cervical plexus (IC) block can provide adequate postoperative analgesia compared to a cervical erector spinae (ES) block in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: In this double-blind prospective trial, 58 patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups prior to the administration of general anesthesia. Patients in the IC group (n = 29) underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral intermediate cervical plexus block with 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% administered to each side. The ES group (n = 29) underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral cervical erector spinae plane blocks with 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine administered to each side at the C6 level. The primary outcome was to record the time to the first call for rescue analgesia (nalbuphine), and the secondary outcomes were to measure the performance time, the onset of the sensory block, the intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain intensity using VAS, the postoperative total nalbuphine consumption, and postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia. RESULTS: The performance and onset of sensory block times were significantly shorter in the IC group compared to the ES group. The time to first call for nalbuphine was significantly shorter in the IC group (7.31 ± 1.34 h) compared to the ES group (11.10 ± 1.82 h). The mean postoperative VAS scores were comparable between the two groups at the measured time points, except at 8 h, where it was significantly higher in the IC group, and at 12 h, where it was significantly higher in the ES group. The total nalbuphine consumption was significantly higher in the IC group (33.1 ± 10.13 mg) compared to the ES group (22.76 ± 8.62 mg). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery, the intermediate cervical plexus block does not provide better postoperative regional analgesia compared to the cervical erector spinae block. Performance time and onset time were shorter in the IC group, whereas nalbuphine consumption was lower in the ES group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov. (NCT05577559, and the date of registration: 13-10-2022).

Erector spinae plane block did not improve postoperative pain-related outcomes and recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery : a randomised controlled double-blinded multi-center trial.

INTRODUCTION: There is a sizable niche for a minimally invasive analgesic technique that could facilitate ambulatory video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Our study aimed to determine the analgesic potential of a single-shot erector spinae plane (ESP) block for VATS. The primary objective was the total hydromorphone consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) 24 h after surgery. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind study with patients scheduled for VATS in two major university-affiliated hospital centres. We randomized 52 patients into two groups: a single-shot ESP block using bupivacaine or an ESP block with normal saline (control). We administered a preoperative and postoperative (24 h) quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire and assessed postoperative pain using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) score. We evaluated the total standardized intraoperative fentanyl administration, total postoperative hydromorphone consumption (PCA; primary endpoint), and the incidence of adverse effects. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary objective, hydromorphone consumption at 24 h (7.6 (4.4) mg for the Bupivacaine group versus 8.1 (4.2) mg for the Control group). Secondary objectives and incidence of adverse events were not different between the two groups at any time during the first 24 h following surgery. CONCLUSION: Our multi-centre randomized, controlled, double-blinded study found no advantage of an ESP block over placebo for VATS for opioid consumption, pain, or QoR-15 scores. Further studies are ongoing to establish the benefits of using a denser block (single-shot paravertebral with a continuous ESP block), which may provide a better quality of analgesia.

Blood bupivacaine concentrations after pecto-serratus and serratus anterior plane injections of plain and liposomal bupivacaine in robotically-assisted mitral valve surgery: Sub-study of a randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the timing of peak blood concentrations and potential toxicity when using a combination of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for thoracic fascial plane blocks. DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic analysis. SETTING: Operating room. PATIENTS: Eighteen adult patients undergoing robotically-assisted mitral valve surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound-guided pecto-serratus and serratus anterior plane blocks using a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine HCl up to 2.5 mg/kg and liposomal bupivacaine up to 266 mg. MEASUREMENTS: Arterial plasma bupivacaine concentration. MAIN RESULTS: Samples from 13 participants were analyzed. There was substantial inter-patient variability in plasma concentrations. A geometric mean maximum bupivacaine concentration was 1492 ng/ml (range 660 to 4650 ng/ml) at median time of 30 min after injection. In 4/13 (31%) patients, plasma bupivacaine concentrations exceeded our predefined 2000 ng/ml toxic threshold. A second much smaller peak was observed about 32 h after the injection. No obvious signs of local anesthetic toxicity were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Combined injection of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for pecto-serratus/serratus anterior plane blocks produced a biphasic pattern, with the highest arterial plasma concentrations observed within 30 min. Maximum concentrations exceeded the potential toxic threshold in nearly a third of patients, but without clinical evidence of toxicity. Clinicians should not assume that routine combinations of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for thoracic fascial plane blocks are inherently safe.

Fluoroscopic Guided Lumbar Erector Spinae (ESP) Field Blocks: A New Technique and Radiographic Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar Erector Spinae (ESP) field blocks have become a common postoperative treatment for surgical pain. The use of long-acting medications like liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) has become a major component of multimodal postsurgical pain control. Traditionally ESP injections have been performed using ultrasound (U/S) guidance by an anesthesiologist. Spine surgeons have begun to utilize these liposomal injections in their procedures for postoperative pain management. Our study describes a fluoroscopic guided ESP field block technique which provides reproducible muscular coverage and pain control for spine surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing single level lumbar fusion were treated preoperatively with bilateral fluoroscopically-guided lumbar erector spinae ESP field blocks with liposomal bupivacaine. We looked at 2 different injection locations involving the ESP or multifidus muscle fascial planes. The injections contained Iohexal, which was used to evaluate the coverage area of the injection. The levels of coverage were recorded, and postoperative pain control was measured immediately, postoperatively, and at 24 hours. RESULTS: Fluoroscopic field blocks at the L3-4 level were found to provide at least 4 levels of vertebral coverage rostral-caudally in both ESP and MF fascial planes. Pain was well controlled in both injection sites. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon-administered fluoroscopic-guided ESP field blocks provided a reliable and consistent pattern of coverage with good postoperative pain control. This technique can be easily adopted by spine surgeons.

A Feasibility Study for a Novel Trans-infraorbital Canal Approach to the Maxillary Nerve in Pigs (Sus domesticus).

Experimental maxillofacial surgery is commonly performed in pigs; however, locoregional anesthesia of this area has not been described. This study evaluated the feasibility of a novel maxillary nerve block approach. In part I, cadavers were used to determine anatomic landmarks and assess maxillary nerve dye staining by using 0.03 mL kg-1 of a 1:10 mixture of commercial food dye and 0.5% bupivacaine. In part II, 10 additional pig cadavers underwent bilateral ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve blocks by using trans-infraorbital canal needle placement. The maxillary nerve was harvested and scored based on degree of staining (0 and 1, absent or incomplete staining; 2, staining; >1 cm circumferentially). Intracranial and intraconal spread of dye was evaluated. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare infraorbital canal length estimated either externally via landmarks, internally via ultrasound, or actually measured after dissection. In 18 of 20 (90%) injections, successful staining (score = 2) of maxillary nerves was obtained for a nerve length of 2.4 ± 0.3 cm. Two of 20 cases (10%) had inadequate staining (score <2). At dissection of these 2 cases, the needle tip was observed to have collided with an unerupted tooth (third molar). No intracranial or intraconal spread of dye was observed. We detected no statistical differences between the estimated external, estimated internal, or actual dissection methods for measurement of infraorbital canal length (P = 0.3). Ultrasound-guided trans-infraorbital maxillary nerve block in pigs is a feasible technique, warranting further work to evaluate its in vivo efficacy and safety.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Suspension Can Reduce the Length of Stay of Patients Undergoing Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Poorly controlled postoperative pain results in prolonged length of stay (LOS). The use of liposome bupivacaine injectable suspension (LB) for postoperative pain control is a relatively recent practice. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the following. In patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fracture(s), does the use of LB reduce LOS compared with regular bupivacaine? STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: We implemented a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with mandibular fracture(s) presented to Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, from January 2021 to January 2022. Adult patients diagnosed with 1 or more isolated mandibular fracture(s) and treated by open reduction and internal fixation were included. We excluded patients with non-isolated mandibular fracture(s), isolated condyle, infected, previously treated fractures, and documented allergy to amide local anesthetics and/or its preservatives. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: Primary predictor variable was local anesthetic (regular bupivacaine alone or LB/regular bupivacaine). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): Primary outcome variable was LOS, defined as the number of days from surgical procedure until discharge. Secondary outcome variables were number of opioid prescription refill(s) and postoperative pain at discharge, determined with visual analogue scale. COVARIATES: The covariates were Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, smoking, alcohol exposure, illicit drug use, etiology, location, laterality, number of fracture(s), surgical approach, and method of maxillomandibular fixation. ANALYSES: Univariate and bivariate analyses were calculated. Statistical significance was P < .05. RESULTS: Sixty-two subjects met the inclusion criteria (31 subjects in each group). The mean ages in LB/regular bupivacaine and regular bupivacaine alone groups were 33.3 (±12) and 35.1 (±15.6), respectively (P = .94), the mean LOS in days was 0.23 (±0.44) in LB/regular bupivacaine and 1.48 (±1.77) in regular bupivacaine alone (P= < .001), and the mean VAS pain scores for LB/regular bupivacaine and regular bupivacaine alone groups were 0.53 (±1.07) and 1.87 (±2.66), respectively (P = .02). Mean number of opioid prescription refill(s) was 0 in LB/regular bupivacaine and 1 in regular bupivacaine alone group, respectively (P = .01). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The use of LB/regular bupivacaine for mandibular fracture(s) results in decrease in LOS and number of opioid refills compared to regular bupivacaine alone.

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Outpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Matched-Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is the predominant regimen in outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA), but induction often is unsuccessful, unobtainable, or against patient preference. We compared outcomes of same-day discharge (SDD) TJA with spinal versus general anesthesia in a free-standing ambulatory surgery center (ASC). METHODS: We took 105 general anesthesia TJA and one-to-one nearest-neighbor matched them to 105 spinal anesthesia TJA over 7 years at 1 ASC. The rate of successful SDD, minutes to discharge, postoperative pain and nausea, and 90-day complications were compared. Postanesthesia care unit outcomes were additionally stratified by spinal anesthetic (mepivacaine versus bupivacaine). RESULTS: All spinal anesthetic patients underwent SDD compared with 103 (98%) general anesthetic patients (P = .498). Mepivacaine spinal anesthesia patients spent the fewest minutes in postanesthesia care unit prior to discharge from the facility (206), followed by general anesthesia (227), and bupivacaine spinal anesthesia (291; P < .001). General anesthesia patients had the highest levels of pain at 1 hour (5.2 versus 1.5 versus 1.5) and 2 hours (3.2 versus 2.0 versus 1.3) postoperatively, and rates of nausea (48 versus 22 versus 28%) compared with mepivacaine and bupivacaine spinal anesthesia, respectively. The 90-day complications (6 versus 7), admissions (1 versus 3), and reoperations (5 versus 2) were similar among spinal and general anesthesia, respectively (P ≥ .445). CONCLUSIONS: Both spinal and general anesthesia led to reliable SDD with similar 90-day complication rates. General anesthesia facilitated faster discharge from the ASC compared with bupivacaine spinal anesthesia but led to higher levels of pain and incidence of nausea postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Retrospective Cohort Comparison.

A comparison of the motor effects and analgesic efficacy following lumbar plexus block combined with sciatic nerve block or epidural in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare motor effects and analgesic efficacy following an ultrasound-guided lateral approach to lumbar plexus blockade at L7 and sciatic nerve blockade (LPSNB) against epidural injection in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 27 healthy adult dogs undergoing unilateral TPLO surgery. METHODS: Dogs were allocated to either LPSNB (bupivacaine 2 mg kg-1, 0.75%) or epidural (morphine PF 0.1 mg kg-1 and bupivacaine 0.5 mg kg-1, 0.75%). Other aspects of clinical management were identical, including anesthetic drug protocol, area of presurgical clipping and bladder care. Time to perform the block, response to surgical stimuli, pain scores, rescue analgesia, time to stand and walk, motor score and time to first urination were recorded. One evaluator, unaware of treatment status, performed all evaluations. Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables between groups, and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Median (range) times to stand and walk were shorter for LPSNB [60 (40-120) minutes and 90 (60-150) minutes, respectively, p = 0.003] than for epidural [150 (120-240) minutes and 180 (120-360) minutes, respectively, p = 0.006]. Four dogs required rescue intraoperatively (three in epidural group, one in LPSNB group, p = 0.438). Pain scores over the 24 hour evaluation period were similar, and not significantly different, for each group. Time to spontaneous urination [LPSNB, 330 (240-360) minutes; epidural, 300 (120-1440) minutes, p = 1.0] did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An ultrasound-guided lateral paravertebral approach to the lumbar plexus within the psoas compartment at L7, combined with sciatic nerve blockade, allows faster return to normal motor function, with similar pain control and impact on urination when compared with epidural in dogs after TPLO surgery.

Comparison of the effects of one-level and bi-level pre-incisional erector spinae plane block on postoperative acute pain in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of One-Level pre-incisional erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and Bi-Level pre-incisional ESPB in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). METHODS: This pilot trial was conducted between April 2022 and February 2023 with sixty patients. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In One-Level ESPB Group (n = 30) block was performed at the thoracal(T)5 level with the 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. In the Bi-Level ESPB Group (n = 30) block was performed at T4 and T6 levels by using 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine for each level. In the postoperative period, 50 mg dexketoprofen every 12 h and 1 g paracetamol every 8 h were given intravenously (IV). Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) prepared with morphine was applied to the patients. 0.5 mg/kg of tramadol was administered via IV for rescue analgesia. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded in the postoperative 1st, 2nd, 4th, 12th, 24th, and 48th -hours. The need for additional analgesics and side effects were recorded. In two groups, patients' demographics and postoperative hemodynamic data were recorded. RESULTS: VAS scores at resting were statistically significantly higher at the 1st (p: 0.002) and 4th -hour (p: 0.001) in the One-Level ESPB. When the groups were evaluated in terms of VAS coughing scores, the 4th -hour (p: 0.001) VAS coughing scores results were found to be statistically significantly higher in the One-Level ESPB group. In terms of VAS values evaluated during follow-up, the rates of VAS coughing score > 3 values were found to be statistically significantly lower in the Bi-Level ESPB group (p: 0.011). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of side effects, morphine consumption, and additional analgesic use (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adequate analgesia was achieved in the early postoperative period in the group treated with Bi-Level ESPB with similar morphine consumption and side effects. This may be an advantage, especially in the early postoperative period when the pain is quite intense.

Qualitative Histologic Assessment vs. Geomorphometric Analysis of Nerve Fiber Shape after the Intraneural Application of Liposomal Bupivacaine / Evaluación Histológica Cualitativa Versus Análisis Geomorfométrico de la Forma de la Fibra Nerviosa Después de la Aplicación Intraneural de Bupivacaína Liposomal

SUMMARY: The preserved form of all components of the nerve fiber is a prerequisite for the proper conduction of the nerve impulse. various factors can change the shape of nerve fibers. In everyday practice, qualitative histological analysis is the gold standard for detecting changes in shape. Geometric morphometry is an innovative method that objectively enables the assessment of changes in nerve fibers' shape after local anesthetics action. A total of sixty sciatic nerves were used as material, which was intraneural injected with saline solution in the control group (n=30), and a solution of 1.33 % liposomal bupivacaine (n=30) in the test group. After the animals were sacrificed, nerve samples were taken and histological preparations were made. The preparations were first described and examined using a qualitative histological method, after which digital images were made. The images were entered into the MorphoJ program and processed using the method of geometric morphometry. Qualitative histological examination revealed no differences in nerve fibers after intraneurally applied physiological solution and liposomal bupivacaine. Using the method of geometric morphometry, a statistically significant change in the shape of axons was found after intraneurally applied saline solution and liposomal bupivacaine (p=0.0059). No significant differences in histological changes were found after the qualitative histological analysis of nerve fiber cross-section preparations. A statistically significant change in the shape of nerve fiber axons was observed after geometric morphometric analysis of digital images after intraneural application of saline and liposomal bupivacaine.

La forma conservada de todos los componentes de la fibra nerviosa es un requisito previo para la conducción correcta del impulso nervioso. Varios factores pueden cambiar la forma de las fibras nerviosas. En la práctica diaria, el análisis histológico cualitativo es el estándar de oro para detectar cambios de forma. La morfometría geométrica es un método innovador que permite evaluar objetivamente los cambios en la forma de las fibras nerviosas después de la acción de los anestésicos locales. Se utilizó como material un total de sesenta nervios ciáticos, que se inyectaron intraneuralmente con solución salina en el grupo control (n=30), y una solución de bupivacaína liposomal al 1,33 % (n=30) en el grupo de prueba. Después de sacrificados los animales, se tomaron muestras de nervios y se realizaron preparaciones histológicas. Primero se describieron y examinaron las preparaciones utilizando un método histológico cualitativo, después de lo cual se tomaron imágenes digitales. Las imágenes fueron ingresadas al programa MorphoJ y procesadas mediante el método de morfometría geométrica. El examen histológico cualitativo no reveló diferencias en las fibras nerviosas después de la aplicación intraneural de solución fisiológica y bupivacaína liposomal. Usando el método de morfometría geométrica, se encontró un cambio estadísticamente significativo en la forma de los axones después de la aplicación intraneural de solución salina y bupivacaína liposomal (p = 0,0059). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en los cambios histológicos después del análisis histológico cualitativo de las preparaciones de secciones transversales de fibras nerviosas. Se observó un cambio estadísticamente significativo en la forma de los axones de las fibras nerviosas después del análisis de morfometría geométrica de imágenes digitales después de la aplicación intraneural de solución salina y bupivacaína liposomal.

Randomised, prospective, blinded, clinical trial of opioid-free injectable anaesthesia with or without multimodal analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared an opioid-free injectable anaesthetic protocol with or without multimodal analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, blinded, clinical trial, 29 healthy kittens (mean ± SD weight 1.55 ± 0.46 kg; aged 10 weeks to 6 months) were included. Anaesthesia was performed with an intramuscular injection of ketamine (4 mg/kg), dexmedetomidine (40 µg/kg) and midazolam (0.25 mg/kg). In the multimodal group (MMG), cats (n = 14) received meloxicam (0.1 mg/kg SC) and intraperitoneal bupivacaine 0.25% (2 mg/kg), whereas the same volume of saline was administered in the control group (CG; n = 15). Atipamezole (0.4 mg/kg IM) was given 15 mins after ovariohysterectomy. Postoperative pain was assessed using the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional feline pain assessment scale - short form. Rescue analgesia (buprenorphine 0.02 mg/kg IM in MMG/CG and meloxicam 0.1 mg/kg SC in CG) was administered if pain scores were ⩾4/12. Soft food intake (after 2 and 60 mins) was evaluated at specific time points postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed with linear models and post-hoc pairwise comparison with Benjamini-Hochberg corrections (P <0.05). RESULTS: The prevalence of rescue analgesia was higher in the CG (n = 15/15) than the MMG (n = 1/14; P <0.001). Pain scores at 1 h, 2 h and 4 h postoperatively were higher in the CG (4.1 ± 2.8, 4.8 ± 3.0 and 5.3 ± 1.2, respectively) than in the MMG (1.6 ± 1.0, 1.1 ± 1.0 and 0.9 ± 0.8, respectively; P <0.001). Food intake (%) at 1 h postoperatively was higher in the MMG after 2 and 60 mins (10.4 ± 9 and 71.9 ± 29, respectively) than in the CG (1.4 ± 2 and 13.9 ± 7, respectively; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This opioid-free protocol using multimodal analgesia produced adequate postoperative pain relief, while almost eliminating the need for rescue analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Pain decreased food intake.

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Anterior, Posterior and Combination of Quadratus Lumborum Block in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is an effective technique to provide analgesia for upper and lower abdominal surgeries. There are various approaches described in the literature, but the best approach is still to be explored. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of three different approaches of QLBs. METHODS: Sixty-five patients, aged 18-70 years posted for elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled after taking written informed consent. QLB was given using bupivacaine 0.25% 40 mL with injection dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg in all the groups. In Group 1 and Group 2, the drug was injected into the anterior and posterior aspects of the muscle respectively. In Group 3, a combination of the anterior-posterior approach was used. Pain scores at various intervals along with analgesic consumption and complications were observed. RESULTS: The demographic variables, hemodynamic parameters, and complications were comparable among the three groups. There were statistically significant differences between treatment groups in fentanyl requirement as assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (P = 0.012). Pairwise post-hoc analysis between block groups showed that the differences between Group 1 & Group 2 and Group 2 & Group 3 were significant (P = 0.0098 and P = 0.013). The tramadol requirement was comparable in all the groups (P = 0.75). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in Group 3 compared to other groups (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Further studies can be planned to evaluate the best approach for QLB in terms of perioperative analgesia, which remains a dilemma in this pilot study. The anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior QLB approaches appear equally efficacious as a component of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.

Lipid emulsions attenuate the inhibition of carnitine acylcarnitine translocase induced by toxic doses of local anesthetics in rat cardiomyoblasts.

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of lipid emulsions on carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT-I), carnitine acylcarnitine translocase (CACT), carnitine palmitoyltransferase II (CPT-II), and the mitochondrial dysfunctions induced by toxic doses of local anesthetics in H9c2 rat cardiomyoblasts. The effects of local anesthetics and lipid emulsions on the activities of CPT-I, CACT, and CPT-II, and concentrations of local anesthetics were examined. The effects of lipid emulsions, N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), and mitotempo on the bupivacaine-induced changes in cell viability, reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and intracellular calcium levels were examined. CACT, without significantly altering CPT-I and CPT-II, was inhibited by toxic concentration of local anesthetics. The levobupivacaine- and bupivacaine-induced inhibition of CACT was attenuated by all concentrations of lipid emulsion, whereas the ropivacaine-induced inhibition of CACT was attenuated by medium and high concentrations of lipid emulsion. The concentration of levobupivacaine was slightly attenuated by lipid emulsion. The bupivacaine-induced increase of ROS and calcium and the bupivacaine-induced decrease of MMP were attenuated by ROS scavengers NAC and mitotempo, and the lipid emulsion. Collectively, these results suggested that the lipid emulsion attenuated the levobupivacaine-induced inhibition of CACT, probably through the lipid emulsion-mediated sequestration of levobupivacaine.

Peripheral nerve blocks with liposomal bupivacaine are associated with increased opioid use compared to thoracic epidural in patients with an epigastric incision.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic epidurals are commonly recommended in enhanced recovery protocols, though they may cause hypotension and urinary retention. Peripheral nerve blocks using liposomal bupivacaine are a potential alternative, though they have not been extensively studied in major cancer operations with an epigastric incision. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data following the transition from thoracic epidural to liposomal peripheral nerve blocks in patients undergoing major oncologic surgery. Patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks were compared to those receiving thoracic epidural. Outcome variables included postoperative opioid use (milligram morphine equivalents [MME]), severe pain, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 102 patients studied (46%) received peripheral nerve blocks. Opioid use was higher in the peripheral nerve block group during the 0-24 h (116 vs. 94 MME, p = 0.04) and 24-48 h postoperative period (94 vs. 23 MME, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in severe pain, hypotension, urinary retention, or ileus. Peripheral nerve blocks were associated with earlier ambulation (1 vs. 2 days, p = 0.04), though other milestones were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal peripheral nerve blocks were associated with increased opioid use compared to thoracic epidural. On the basis of our results, thoracic epidural might be preferred in surgical oncology patients with an epigastric incision.