Paracervical block before laparoscopic total hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that paracervical block with 0.5 % bupivacaine decreases postoperative pain after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). MATERIALS AND METHOD: This randomized double-blind placebo control trial included 152 women. We injected 10 mL 0.5 % bupivacaine (study group, n = 75) or 10 mL normal saline (control group, n = 77) at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions of the uterine cervix. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale score (VAS) determined 1 h (h) postoperatively. RESULTS: The 152 patients did not differ in their baseline demographics or perioperative characteristics. The mean VAS 1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the study group than in controls (5.7 ± 1.2 vs. 6.8 ± 1.1, P < 0.001). The average VAS at 30 min, 3 h, and 6 h postoperatively was also significantly lower in the study group. Patients in the study group had a significantly lower analgesic requirement than did controls during the first 24 h postoperatively (6 [7.8 %] vs. 16 [21 %], P = 0.021). Total QoR-40 questionnaire scores were higher in patients who received bupivacaine. CONCLUSION: Paracervical bloc with 0.5 % bupivacaine just before TLH is an effective and safe method to reduce pain and lower postoperative analgesic requirement. URL LINK THAT LEADS DIRECTLY TO THE TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05341869?cond=NCT05341869&draw=2&rank=1.

Single-shot liposomal bupivacaine in place of rectus sheath catheters to provide non-opiate analgesia after laparotomy: a quality improvement project to reduce the need for ongoing nursing input.

Opioid-sparing pain management is an integral component of enhanced recovery after colonic and rectal surgery. In our hospital, rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) are routinely placed during emergency laparotomy for colorectal procedures to allow a postoperative compartmental block of the surgical site with repeated doses of bupivacaine. However, RSCs require a significant amount of clinical nursing time to maintain and 'top-up'. We present a quality improvement project in which we administered single-shot liposomal bupivacaine (LB) intraoperatively as an alternative to bolus doses of conventional bupivacaine delivered through RSCs. Having thereby reduced the demands placed on nursing time through a reduction in the use of RSCs, we sought to establish whether there was any associated change in analgesic efficacy. Patient pain scores, use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and length of stay following surgery were analysed before and after the introduction of LB. No disruption in these outcomes was identified using statistical process control analysis. A direct comparison of results for patients who received LB versus those who received bolus dosing of bupivacaine via RSCs found no significant differences, with a median total PCA dose of 270 mg oral morphine equivalents (OME) for patients who received LB versus 396 mg OME for patients who had RSCs (p=0.54). The median length of stay for patients who received LB was 15.5 days versus 16 days for those who had RSCs (p=0.87). We conclude that LB represents a viable alternative to boluses of conventional bupivacaine via RSCs in promoting enhanced recovery after emergency laparotomy and look to extend its use locally.

Bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension does not provide improved pain control in dogs undergoing abdominal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the difference in postoperative pain scores of dogs undergoing abdominal surgery receiving surgical incision infiltration of saline or bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension (BLIS). ANIMALS: 40 dogs undergoing exploratory laparotomy. METHODS: Dogs were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either BLIS or saline surgical incision infiltration. All dogs received 5.3 mg of BLIS/kg or an equal volume of saline infiltrated in the muscle/fascia, subcutaneous tissue, and intradermal layer during closure. All dogs received a standardized postoperative pain management protocol. Pain assessment was performed at select time points postoperatively by blinded observers with an electronic algometer, short version of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (GCMPS), and indirect measures of pain, including systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and serum cortisol levels. RESULTS: At day 0, blood pressure was higher in the saline group (149.6 vs 125.8 mm Hg; P = .006). At day 3, GCMPS was lower in the BLIS group (BLIS = 1, saline = 2, P = .027), though both average GCMPS scores were low and only 10 dogs were available for day 3 assessments (6 BLIS and 4 saline). No other differences in algometer readings, GCMPS scores, other measured parameters, or need for rescue analgesia were present between BLIS and saline groups at any time point. There was no difference in postoperative incisional infection rate or complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Use of BLIS for exploratory laparotomy did not provide improved pain control over postoperative opioid administration alone. Patients that received BLIS had no increase in short-term complications.

A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, prospective clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness of a diluted liposomal-encapsulated bupivacaine suspension in dogs undergoing a ventral midline celiotomy.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a liposomal-encapsulated bupivacaine suspension (LEBS; Nocita), at a 1:5 dilution with 0.9% NaCl, for the reduction of postoperative pain scores and a related reduction in the need for postoperative opioids in dogs undergoing ventral midline celiotomy. Hypothesis: When infused at a 1:5 dilution, LEBS results in less postoperative pain (as indicated by pain scale scores), and a reduction in postoperative opioids, in dogs undergoing ventral midline celiotomy. The use of LEBS does not affect wound healing when compared to placebo. Study design: This was a randomized, blinded, prospective clinical trial. Animals: We studied 40 client-owned dogs undergoing abdominal surgery via a ventral midline celiotomy. Procedure: Dogs undergoing a ventral midline celiotomy were enrolled and randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: those receiving LEBS or a placebo injection protocol into tissue planes during closure. The Glasgow Composite Pain Scale-Short Form (GCPS-SF) was used by an observer blinded to the treatment group to assess patients at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, and 72 h after extubation. Dogs with a score of ≥ 3 in any single category or ≥ 6 total were given a rescue analgesia. Data were analyzed to compare the number of rescue therapy doses administered between the 2 treatment groups. Results: Forty dogs completed the study. Dogs that received a diluted LEBS protocol were equally likely to require a rescue therapy as those that received the placebo (0.9% NaCl). There were no significant difference in the pain scores or the total number of opioid injections required between the 2 treatment groups. Conclusion and clinical relevance: In dogs undergoing ventral midline celiotomy, 1:5 diluted LEBS administration alone should not be considered the sole method of pain relief. Liposomal-encapsulated bupivacaine suspension should be used in conjunction with systemic opioids as part of a multimodal analgesic regime. This multimodal approach would allow a reduction in dose or frequency of opioids, therefore lessening the undesired side effects associated with opioids while also decreasing client costs.

Une étude clinique prospective, randomisée, en aveugle, contrôlée par placebo, visant à évaluer l'efficacité d'une suspension diluée de bupivacaïne encapsulée dans des liposomes chez des chiens subissant une cœliotomie via la ligne médiane ventrale. Objectif: Évaluer l'efficacité d'une suspension de bupivacaïne encapsulée dans des liposomes (LEBS; Nocita), à une dilution de 1:5 avec 0,9 % de NaCl, pour la réduction des scores de douleur postopératoire et une réduction connexe du besoin d'opioïdes postopératoires chez des chiens subissant une céliotomie via la ligne médiane ventrale. Hypothèse: Lorsqu'il est perfusé à une dilution de 1:5, LEBS entraîne moins de douleur postopératoire (comme l'indiquent les scores de l'échelle de douleur) et une réduction des opioïdes postopératoires chez les chiens subissant une cœliotomie via la ligne médiane ventrale. L'utilisation du LEBS n'affecte pas la cicatrisation des plaies par rapport au placebo. Design expérimental: Il s'agissait d'un essai clinique prospectif, randomisé et en aveugle. Animaux: Nous avons étudié 40 chiens appartenant à des clients subissant une chirurgie abdominale par cœliotomie via la ligne médiane ventrale. Procédure: Les chiens subissant une cœliotomie via la ligne médiane ventrale ont été recrutés et répartis au hasard dans 1 groupe sur 2 : ceux recevant du LEBS ou un protocole d'injection de placebo dans les plans tissulaires pendant la fermeture. Le Glasgow Composite Pain Scale-Short Form (GCPS-SF) a été utilisé par un observateur aveugle au groupe de traitement pour évaluer les patients à 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66 et 72 h après l'extubation. Les chiens avec un score ≥ 3 dans n'importe quelle catégorie ou ≥ 6 au total ont reçu une analgésie de secours. Les données ont été analysées pour comparer le nombre de doses de thérapie de secours administrées entre les 2 groupes de traitement. Résultats: Quarante chiens ont complété l'étude. Les chiens ayant reçu un protocole LEBS dilué étaient tout aussi susceptibles de nécessiter une thérapie de secours que ceux ayant reçu le placebo (NaCl à 0,9 %). Il n'y avait aucune différence significative dans les scores de douleur ou le nombre total d'injections d'opioïdes nécessaires entre les 2 groupes de traitement. Conclusion et pertinence clinique: Chez les chiens subissant une cœliotomie via la ligne médiane ventrale, l'administration de LEBS dilué à 1:5 seule ne doit pas être considérée comme la seule méthode de soulagement de la douleur. La suspension de bupivacaïne encapsulée dans des liposomes doit être utilisée en association avec des opioïdes systémiques dans le cadre d'un régime analgésique multimodal. Cette approche multimodale permettrait de réduire la dose ou la fréquence des opioïdes, réduisant ainsi les effets secondaires indésirables associés aux opioïdes tout en diminuant également les coûts pour les clients.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Epidural Analgesia for Pain Relief After Lumbar Interlaminar Decompressive Spine Surgery: The RAPID trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: If an intraoperative single bolus of epidural bupivacaine can result in less postoperative pain following lumbar spinal decompression surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adequate postoperative pain management following lumbar spinal decompression surgery is important, as it will lead to early mobilization, less complications, and a shorter hospital stay. Opioid consumption should be limited due to their frequently accompanied side effects and their addictive nature. During the final phase of lumbar decompression surgery, the epidural space becomes easily accessible. This might be an ideal moment for surgeons to administer an epidural bolus of analgesia as a safe and effective method for postoperative pain relief. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this trial, we compared a single intraoperative bolus of epidural analgesia using bupivacaine 0.25% to placebo (NaCl 0.9%) and its effect on postoperative pain following lumbar spinal decompression surgery. The primary outcome was the difference in Numeric (Pain) Rating Scale between the intervention and placebo groups during the first 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Both the intervention group and the placebo group consisted of 20 randomized patients (N=40). Statistically significant lower mean Numeric (Pain) Rating Scale pain scores were observed in the intervention group in comparison with the control group (main effect group: -2.35±0.77, P =0.004). The average pain score was lower in the intervention group at all postoperative time points. No study-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: This randomized controlled trial shows that administrating a bolus of intraoperative epidural bupivacaine is a safe and effective method for reducing early postoperative pain following lumbar decompression surgery.

Effects of Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through Perichondrial Approach on Postoperative Pain and Analgaesic Consumption in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate postoperative analgaesic efficacy of modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) and its effect on opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Randomised, controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkiye, from April to May 2023. METHODOLOGY: The study was conducted in two randomised groups: M-TAPA (n = 21) and control group (CG) (no block) (n = 21). All patients had standard general anaesthesia. M-TAPA patients had bilateral M-TAPA block with 0.25% bupivacaine (total volume, 40 ml) at the end of the surgery. In contrast, CG patients had only tramadol for postoperative pain. A numerical rating scale (NRS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used for postoperative pain assessment. Total tramadol consumption was calculated. RESULTS: M-TAPA's NRS and VAS scores were lower in postoperative 24 hours (p<0.05). Total tramadol consumption was 116.67 ± 32.91 mg in CG and 35.71 ± 39.19 mg in M-TAPA (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Bilateral M-TAPA block for postoperative pain control after LC surgery provided effective analgaesia for up to 24 hours and reduced total opioid consumption. Although the M-TAPA block is a novel approach, it will be a part of multimodal analgaesia for routine postoperative pain management in abdominal surgeries. However, more studies with higher numbers of patients will be needed. KEY WORDS: Analgaesia, Bupivacaine, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Nerve block, Pain management.

Effects of liposomal bupivacaine in preoperative fascia iliac block on postoperative pain and delirium in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a study protocol for a randomised, parallel controlled prospective clinical study.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative delirium (POD) is the most common acute fluctuating mental state change after hip fractures in older adults. Postoperative pain is a Grade A risk factor for POD and is closely related to the prognosis of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The fascia iliac block has a definite analgesic effect and few side effects, and several studies have reported that it reduces the occurrence of POD in patients undergoing general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Liposomal bupivacaine is a local anaesthetic with a long half-life that significantly reduces the use of opioids and is conducive to patient prognosis and recovery. However, whether regional nerve block analgesia can decrease the occurrence of POD in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery has not been reported. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-blinded, randomised, parallel-controlled prospective clinical study. Participants will be randomly assigned preoperatively to either the liposomal bupivacaine (ie, Exparel) or ropivacaine groups by block randomisation. Then, the occurrence of POD (primary outcome) and postoperative pain (secondary outcome) will be evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research protocol complies with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 guidelines and is approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai General Hospital (ID 2023-437). The original data are expected to be released in July 2029 on the ResMan original data-sharing platform (IPD-sharing platform) of the China Clinical Trial Registry, which can be viewed on the following website: http://www.medresman.org.cn. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300074022.

Stellate ganglion block with procaine in breast cancer survivors with hot flashes and sleep disturbances undergoing Endocrine Therapy.

Breast cancer survivors under endocrine therapy (ET) suffer from side effects such as hot flashes and sleep disturbance accompanied by poor quality of life. Many quit ET early and reduce their survival rate. Guidelines recommend gabapentin next to yoga or acupuncture. The role of side effects related to compliance with ET over years require new and effective therapies. Stellate ganglion block (SGB) has shown evidence of safety and efficacy and was found to be more effective than pregabalin without side effects. However, practical guidelines for the long-term use of SGB are still missing. We primarily used procaine instead of bupivacaine presuming effectiveness paired with lower toxic risks. Twenty-nine breast cancer survivors with severe hot flashes and sleep disturbance under ET received SGB with Procaine. Diaries recorded hot flashes and sleep quality scores up to week 24. All patients took part and none refused SGB. Each Patient received one SGB every 4 weeks without any side effects observed. Weekly scores were reduced from baseline by -33.6% (P < .01) (hot flashes) and -22.3% (P < .01) (sleep disturbances) after 4, and by -58.8% (P < .01) (hot flashes) and -50.8% (P < .01) (sleep disturbances) after twenty-for weeks. A wavelike reduction indicated a limited effect of a single SGB during continuous ET. We showed, that procaine in SGB is as effective as bupivacaine with lower risks and costs. High significant reductions in hot flashes and sleep disturbances after 1 and 6 months were found. We conclude that breast cancer survivors need individual treatment with SGB due to her personal impact. Hence, SGB should find its way to guidelines and daily routines as a valuable method for treating side effects in breast cancer survivors undergoing ET.

Palliation of Intractable Cancer-Related Pain With Low-Dose Epidural Bupivacaine.

Introduction: Patients with advanced cancer nearing end of life often present with complex multifactorial pain. Although epidural analgesia is routinely used in inpatient hospital settings for targeted pain control, there is scant description in the literature of the use of low-dose epidural analgesia for relief of cancer-related pain at end of life. In this study, we present a case of difficult to control cancer-related rectal and pelvic pain in a patient who responded well in her last days of life to a low-dose bupivacaine epidural. Case Description: A 66-year-old woman presented for inpatient hospital admission for pain control from home hospice with intractable cancer-related pain from metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma marked by extensive erosive lesions extending from the anterior perineum to the posterior rectum, with rectovaginal fistula. The patient reported poor tolerance of medications and described spiritual beliefs (based in Buddhism) that caused her and her family to prioritize maintaining a lucid, clear mind above nearly all else while seeking symptom management. The patient was so debilitated by pain at the time of presentation that she was bedbound in a quadruped position. Case Management and Outcome: After 2 weeks of poor pain control in the hospital with multiple failed attempts at palliation-including bilateral pudendal block, as well as opioids and other routine, but potentially sedating or deliriogenic, medications to treat her pain-the patient permitted administration of a low-dose bupivacaine epidural that significantly reduced her pain and allowed the patient to remain clear-headed up until the time of her death. Twenty-three days after admission, and 5 days after initiation of low-dose bupivacaine epidural for pain control, the patient died peacefully in the hospital. Conclusion: Low-dose epidural analgesia for cancer-related pain at end of life from malignancy involving the pelvis-perineum, rectum, or vagina-may be a viable option for patients, particularly those who wish to avoid the risk of somnolence or confusion from systemic opioids and other analgesics.

Pudendal Nerve Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension.

IMPORTANCE: Pudendal nerve block has been frequently used as a pain management modality for vaginal prolapse surgery. However, studies investigating its efficacy and the type of anesthetic used have had conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intraoperative pudendal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine on postoperative pain after sacrospinous ligament suspension surgery. STUDY DESIGN: In this single-blinded randomized controlled trial, 83 women undergoing sacrospinous ligament suspension were randomized to receive either intraoperative pudendal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine or no block. Participants recorded their pain level on postoperative days (PODs) 1-3 and 7, the number of pain medication pills consumed, and the quality of their recovery using a validated questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in pain scores between the groups on POD 1 and POD 3: 5 (2-6.25) versus 5.5 (4-8; P = 0.058) and 4 (1-6) versus 5 (2-7; P = 0.146), respectively. On POD 2, the overall pain score was statistically different between the groups, with the block group having lower interquartile ranges. This difference, however, was not clinically significant: 5 (1.75-5) versus 5 (3.25-7.75; P = 0.023). In the subset of participants who underwent a concomitant midurethral sling procedure, POD 2 and POD3 pain scores were significantly lower in those who received the block: 3 (1-5) versus 6 (5-8; P = 0.006) for POD 2 and 3 (1-5) versus 5 (3.250-7; P = 0.042) for POD 3. There were no significant differences in pain medication consumption or the quality of recovery scores. CONCLUSION: Pudendal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine did not result in significant differences in postoperative pain after sacrospinous ligament suspension, except in those participants who underwent a concomitant midurethral sling procedure.

Postoperative effects of bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in septorhinoplasty operations; double-blind randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion blockade (SPGB) on the main postoperative complications in septorhinoplasty operations. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, prospective study, 80 cases planned for Septorhinoplasty operations under general anesthesia were included in the study. The cases were divided into two groups; SPGB was performed with 2 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine bilaterally 15 min before the end of the operation in the SPGB group (Group S, n = 40). In the control group (Group C, n = 40), 2 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution was applied into both SPG areas. In the recovery unit after the operation; the pain and analgesic needs of the patients at 0, 2, 6 and 24 h were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of hemodynamic parameters (ASA, MBP, HR) (p > 0.05) All VAS values were statistically lower in Group S than in Group C (p < 0.05). In Group S, the need for analgesic medication was found in 5 cases between 0-2 h, whereas in Group C, this rate was found in 17 cases, and it was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Bilateral SPGB application was determined to provide better analgesia in the early postoperative period compared to the control group, it was concluded that further studies are needed to say that there are significant effects on laryngospasm and nausea-vomiting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2, degree of recommendation B.

Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine With Bupivacaine Hydrochloride vs Bupivacaine Hydrochloride Alone as a Local Anesthetic for Children Undergoing Ambulatory Urologic Surgery: The Baby ORIOLES Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine if the addition of liposomal bupivacaine to bupivacaine hydrochloride improves opioid-free rate and postoperative pain scores among children undergoing ambulatory urologic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, phase 3, single-blinded, single-center randomized trial with superiority design was conducted in children 6 to 18 years undergoing ambulatory urologic procedures between October 2021 and April 2023. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive dorsal penile nerve block (penile procedures) or incisional infiltration with spermatic cord block (inguinal/scrotal procedures) with weight-based liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine hydrochloride or bupivacaine hydrochloride alone. The primary outcome was opioid-free rate at 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included parents' postoperative pain measure scores, numerical pain scale scores, and weight-based opioid utilization at 48 hours and 10 to 14 days. RESULTS: We randomized 104 participants, with > 98% (102/104) with complete follow-up data at 48 hours and 10 to 14 days. At interim analysis, there was no significant difference in opioid-free rate at 48 hours between arms (60% in the intervention vs 62% in the control group; estimated difference in proportion -1.9% [95% CI, -20%-16%]; P = .8). We observed no increased odds of patients being opioid-free at 48 hours with the intervention compared to the control group (OR 0.96 [95% CI 0.41-2.3]; P = .9). The trial met the predetermined futility threshold for early stopping. There was no difference in parents' postoperative pain measure scores, numerical pain scale scores, or opioid utilization at 48 hours or 10 to 14 days. No difference in adverse events was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of liposomal bupivacaine to bupivacaine hydrochloride did not significantly improve opioid-sparing effect or postoperative pain compared with bupivacaine hydrochloride alone among children ≥ 6 years undergoing ambulatory urologic surgery.

Erector Spinae versus Surgically Placed Pain Catheters for Thoracic Outlet Decompression.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative care after surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) involves multimodal pain control. Pain catheters with bupivacaine infusion are a modality to minimize perioperative narcotic use. Our study aims to compare surgically placed pain catheters (SP) with erector spinae pain catheters (ESP) placed by the anesthesia pain service. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained surgical TOS database identified patients undergoing transaxillary first rib resection (FRR) who had either SP or ESP placed for pain control. Patients were matched for age and gender. Data collected included demographics, operative details, and perioperative pain medication use. Narcotic pain medication doses were converted to milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) for comparison between groups. Pain medications were collected for several time points: intraoperatively, for each postoperative day (POD) and for the entire hospital stay. RESULTS: Eighty-eight total patients were selected for comparison: 44 patients in the SP and ESP groups. Patients in each group did not differ with regards to age, body mass index, gender, diagnosis, or comorbidities. There were no differences in preoperative narcotic use, preoperative pain score, or Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. All patients underwent FRR. Concurrent cervical rib resection was performed in 6.8% SP and 6.8% ESP patients (P = 1.00), pectoralis minor tenotomy in 34.1% SP and 29.5% ESP patients (P = 0.65), and venogram in 31.8% SP and 31.8% ESP patients (P = 1.00). Mean operating room time was 90.0 min in SP and 105.3 min in ESP cases (P = 0.15). Mean length of stay was 1.9 days for SP and 1.8 days for ESP patients (P = 0.56). There were no significant differences in intraoperative narcotics dosing in MME (SP: 22.1 versus ESP: 25.3, P = 0.018). On POD 0, there were no differences in total narcotics dosing (MME) (SP: 112.0 versus ESP: 100.7, P = 0.59), or in the use of acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or muscle relaxants. A similar trend in narcotics dosing was observed on POD 1 (SP: 58.6 versus ESP: 69.7, P = 0.43) and POD 2 (SP: 23.5 versus ESP: 71.3, P = 0.23). On POD 1, there was a higher percentage of SP patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (63.6% vs. 40.9%, P = 0.024); however, this difference was not observed on POD 2. There were no differences in acetaminophen or muscle relaxant use on POD 1 or 2. Total hospital stay MME was similar between groups (SP: 215.9 versus ESP: 250.9, P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Pain catheters with bupivacaine infusions are helpful adjuncts in postoperative pain control after FRR for TOS. This study compares SP to ESP and demonstrates no difference in narcotics use between SP and ESP groups. SP should be used for pain control in facilities which do not have an anesthesia pain service available for ESP placement.

Comparison of the effect of scalp block analgesia bupivacaine 0.25% and clonidine 2 µg/kg with bupivacaine 0.25% and dexamethasone 8 mg on cortisol levels and Numeric Rating Scale in craniotomy tumour.

INTRODUCTION: Craniotomy tumour is brain surgery that can induce a stress response. The stress response can be measured using haemodynamic parameters and plasma cortisol concentration. The stress response that occurs can affect an increase in sympathetic response, such as blood pressure and heart rate, which can lead to an increase in intracranial pressure. Scalp block can reduce the stress response to surgery and post-operative craniotomy tumour pain. The local anaesthetic drug bupivacaine 0.25% is effective in reducing post-operative pain and stress in the form of reducing plasma cortisol levels. The adjuvant addition of clonidine 2 µg/kg or dexamethasone may be beneficial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomised control clinical trial was conducted at the Central Surgery Installation and Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung and Dr. Mohammad Husein Hospital Palembang from December 2022 to June 2023. A total of 40 participants were divided into two groups using block randomisation. Group I receives bupivacaine 0.25% and clonidine 2 µg/kg, and group II receives bupivacaine 0.25% and dexamethasone 8 mg. The plasma cortisol levels of the patient will be assessed at (T0, T1 and T2). All the patient were intubated under general anesthaesia and received the drug for scalp block based on the group being randomised. Haemodynamic monitoring was carried out. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in administering bupivacaine 0.25% and clonidine 2µg/kg compared to administering bupivacaine 0.25% and dexamethasone 8 mg/kg as analgesia for scalp block in tumour craniotomy patients on cortisol levels at 12 hours post-operatively (T1) (p=0.048) and 24 hours post-surgery (T2) (p=0.027), while post-intubation cortisol levels (T0) found no significant difference (p=0.756). There is a significant difference in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at post-intubation (T0) (p=0.003), 12 hours post-operatively (T1) (p=0.002) and 24 hours post-surgery (T2) (p=0.004), There were no postprocedure scalp block side effects in both groups. CONCLUSION: The study found that scalp block with 0.25% bupivacaine and 2µg/kg clonidine is more effective in reducing NRS scores and cortisol levels compared bupivacaine 0.25% and dexamethasone 8mg in tumour craniotomy patients.

Comparison of Pain Control and Analgesic Consumption With or Without Infiltration of Bupivacaine at Port Sites after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Pain management is an essential component of all surgical procedures. Analgesics are used for this purpose but there are some complications in using them. Local anesthetics like bupivacaine can be used to reduce postoperative pain as well as analgesics consumption. The objective of this study is to observe the result of infiltration of bupivacaine at port sites and to compare the postoperative pain relief with that of opioids and NSAID administration following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for chronic calculus cholecystitis. This is a cross sectional study was conducted over one year in the Department of Surgery of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from September 2018 to August 2019. Here total 40 patients were enrolled by purposive sampling. They were divided in two groups. One group received bupivacaine while other did not. A numerical pain scale was used as tool. Data will be recorded by peer reviewed interview and observation based semi structured data collection sheet. Data analysis was done by SPSS version 23.0. P-value was significant at (p<0.05) and determined by chi square test. Written informed consent was taken from the patient. The mean Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score of pain at 6 hour was 2.55±0.6 in Group I and 6.8±1.15 in Group II. The mean NRS score of pain at 12 hour was 4.1±1.21 in Group I and 7.95±0.6 in Group II. The mean time of 1st analgesic administration was 13.85±1.57 hours in Group I and 2.75±0.72 hours in Group II. The mean repeat dose of analgesic was in 22±2.29 hours in Group I and 9.5±1.15 hours in Group II. In Group I one third patients (30.0%) single dose analgesic required in 1st 12 hours while in Group II almost 90.0% patients needed analgesics in 1st 12 hours. In Group I, total doses of analgesics required were 2 in 75.0% patients while in Group II at least 3 doses of analgesics were needed. In Group I only one patient needed analgesic in first 6 hours (5.0%) while in Group II, all the patients (100.0%) needed analgesics. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) between two groups. The patients receiving bupivacaine at port sites will experience less pain at postoperative period and will need less analgesic medications.

Therapeutic efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion compared with thoracic epidural analgesia in major abdominal surgery: a noninferiority randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Open major abdominal surgery is one of the most risky surgical procedures for acute postoperative pain. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) has been considered the standard analgesic approach. In different reports, lidocaine i.v. has been shown to have an analgesic efficacy comparable with TEA. We compared the analgesic efficacy of i.v. lidocaine with thoracic epidural analgesia using bupivacaine in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS: In this noninferiority clinical trial, 210 patients were randomised to thoracic epidural bupivacaine with morphine or i.v. lidocaine. Dynamic pain at 24 h after surgery was measured using a numerical pain rating scale (NPR), and morphine consumption was also measured. A difference in i.v. the lidocaine-epidural bupivacaine NPR of ≤1 for dynamic pain was considered a noninferiority margin. RESULTS: The NPR for dynamic pain in the lidocaine group at 24 h was between 5.7 (1.8) and 5.2 (1.9) in the epidural group, with a difference of 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.0-1.0). In the first 24 h, the average difference in morphine consumption was 1.8 mg between the i.v. lidocaine and epidural groups (95% confidence interval 1-3 mg). No differences were found in adverse events or complications associated with the procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous lidocaine is noninferior to thoracic epidural analgesia for acute postoperative pain control in major abdomial surgery at 24 h postoperatively. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04017013.

Multimodal intrathecal analgesia (MITA) with morphine for reducing postoperative opioid use and acute pain following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: A multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal analgesic modality for patients undergoing hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery remains unknown. The analgesic effects of a multimodal intrathecal analgesia (MITA) technique of intrathecal morphine (ITM) in combination with clonidine and bupivacaine compared to ITM alone have not been investigated in these patients. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study of patients undergoing complex HPB surgery who received ITM, bupivacaine, and clonidine (MITA group) or ITM-only (ITM group) as part of their perioperative analgesia strategy. The primary outcome was the unadjusted oral morphine equivalent daily dose (oMEDD) in milligrams on postoperative day 1. After adjusting for age, body mass index, hospital allocation, type of surgery, operation length, and intraoperative opioid use, postoperative oMEDD use was investigated using a bootstrapped quantile regression model. Other prespecified outcomes included postoperative pain scores, opioid-related adverse events, major complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: In total, 118 patients received MITA and 155 patients received ITM-only. The median (IQR) cumulative oMEDD use on postoperative day 1 was 20.5 mg (8.6:31.0) in the MITA group and 52.1 mg (18.0:107.0) in the ITM group (P < 0.001). There was a variation in the magnitude of the difference in oMEDD use between the groups for different quartiles. For the MITA group, on postoperative day 1, patients in the 25th percentile required 14.0 mg less oMEDD (95% CI: -25.9 to -2.2; P = 0.025), patients in the 50th percentile required 27.8 mg less oMEDD (95% CI: -49.7 to -6.0; P = 0.005), and patients in the 75th percentile required 38.7 mg less oMEDD (95% CI: -72.2 to -5.1; P = 0.041) compared to patients in the same percentile of the ITM group. Patients in the MITA group had significantly lower pain scores in the postoperative recovery unit and on postoperative days 1 to 3. The incidence of postoperative respiratory depression was low (<1.5%) and similar between groups. Patients in the MITA group had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative hypotension requiring vasopressor support. However, no significant differences were observed in major postoperative complications, or the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing complex HPB surgery, the use of MITA, consisting of ITM in combination with intrathecal clonidine and bupivacaine, was associated with reduced postoperative opioid use and resulted in superior postoperative analgesia without risk of respiratory depression when compared to patients who received ITM alone. A randomized prospective clinical trial investigating these two intrathecal analgesic techniques is justified.

Comparison of two different doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine for intracavitary radiotherapy in patients with carcinoma cervix - A randomized control trial.

Background: Subarachnoid block has been used for intracavitary radiotherapy (ICRT) for carcinoma cervix, but the literature on the appropriate dose of local anesthetic required to achieve the desired effect is lacking. We compared two different intrathecal doses of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (1.2 and 1.5 mL) for providing optimal surgical conditions and readiness to discharge in patients undergoing ICRT for carcinoma cervix. Materials and Methods: This prospective double-blind study was done in 80 patients undergoing ICRT. The patients were randomized into two groups (Groups I and II) to receive 1.2 and 1.5 mL of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine, respectively, for ICRT. The level of sensory achieved, the patient satisfaction score, radiation oncologist score, time to L5 regression, and time to motor recovery (walking unaided) were assessed. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were analyzed using SPSS 20 for Windows (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Results: The time taken for the block to regress to L5 (Group I: 134.6 ± 32.4 minutes vs. Group II: 143.2 ± 43.0 minutes, P = 0.31) were comparable. However, the mean time for walking unaided (Group I: 220.87 ± 47.12 minutes versus Group II: 247.00 ± 49.83 minutes, P = 0.032) after the subarachnoid block was significantly less in Group I. The patient satisfaction with the procedure and overall satisfaction of the radiation oncologists regarding the operating condition were comparable in both the groups. Conclusions: Hence, a 1.2 mL dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for ICRT provides optimal surgical conditions with hemodynamic stability and ensures the early discharge of the patient.

Laparoscopic administration of bupivacaine at the uterosacral ligaments during benign laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain continues to be an undermanaged part of the surgical experience. Multimodal analgesia has been adopted in response to the opioid epidemic, but opioid prescribing practices remain high after minimally invasive hysterectomy. Novel adjuvant opioid-sparing analgesia to optimize acute postoperative pain control is crucial in preventing chronic pain and minimizing opioid usage. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effect of direct laparoscopic uterosacral bupivacaine administration on opioid usage and postoperative pain in patients undergoing benign minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-blinded, triple-arm, randomized controlled trial at an academic medical center between March 15, 2021, and April 8, 2022. The inclusion criteria were patients aged >18 years undergoing benign laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy. The exclusion criteria were non-English-speaking patients, patients with an allergy to bupivacaine or actively using opioid medications, patients undergoing transversus abdominis plane block, and patients undergoing supracervical hysterectomy or combination cases with other surgical services. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to the following uterosacral administration before colpotomy: no administration, 20 mL of normal saline, or 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. All patients received incisional infiltration with 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The primary outcome was 24-hour oral morphine equivalent usage (postoperative day 0 and postoperative day 1). The secondary outcomes were total oral morphine equivalent usage in 7 days, last day of oral morphine equivalent usage, numeric pain scores from the universal pain assessment tool, and return of bowel function. Patients reported postoperative pain scores, total opioid consumption, and return of bowel function via Qualtrics surveys. Patient and surgical characteristics and primary and secondary outcomes were compared using chi-square analysis and 1-way analysis of variance. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of opioid use in the first 24 hours after surgery and total opioid use in the 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: Of 518 hysterectomies screened, 410 (79%) were eligible, 215 (52%) agreed to participate, and 180 were ultimately included in the final analysis after accounting for dropout. Most hysterectomies (70%) were performed laparoscopically, and the remainder were performed robotically. Most hysterectomies (94%) were outpatient. Patients randomized to bupivacaine had higher rates of former and current tobacco use, and patients randomized to the no-administration group had higher rates of previous surgery. There was no difference in first 24-hour oral morphine equivalent use among the groups (P=.10). Moreover, there was no difference in numeric pain scores (although a trend toward significance in discharge pain scores in the bupivacaine group), total 7-day oral morphine equivalent use, day of last opioid use, or return of bowel function among the groups (P>.05 for all). The predictors of increased 24-hour opioid usage among all patients included only increased postanesthesia care unit oral morphine equivalent usage. The predictors of 7-day opioid usage among all patients included concurrent tobacco use and mood disorder, history of previous laparoscopy, estimated blood loss of >200 mL, and increased oral morphine equivalent usage in the postanesthesia care unit. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic uterosacral administration of bupivacaine at the time of minimally invasive hysterectomy did not result in decreased opioid usage or change in numeric pain scores.

Are Patients Interested in Liposomal Bupivacaine as a Nonopioid Alternative for Postsurgical Analgesia Following Third Molar Extractions?

BACKGROUND: Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a long-acting local anesthetic used for postsurgical analgesia to reduce pain and the need for opioid pain medication. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess patient interest in the use of LB as an alternative to opioid pain medication following third molar extraction. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was performed. Study subjects included patients 17 years old or greater who presented to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery clinic at Thomas Jefferson University for third molar extraction from May 2019 through January 2020. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was patient interest in LB, defined by "yes" or "no" from the survey question: "would you be interested in an alternative medication administered during the procedure that may decrease the need for opioid pain medication?". The secondary outcome variable was patient willingness to pay (WTP) for LB, defined by the out-of-pocket cost threshold patients reported they would pay. COVARIATES: Covariates included patient demographics, attitudes towards opioid medication, and prior opioid use. ANALYSES: Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests, Kendall's tau correlation, and multivariable logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at P value < .05. RESULTS: A total of 183 subjects completed the study (68% female, 32% male). The mean age was 27.5 years ± 11.1 years. Most subjects (76%) were interested in LB, but 88% had a WTP threshold below $200. Interest in LB was associated with higher WTP thresholds (adjusted odds ratio {aOR} 2.07; 95% confidence interval {CI} [1.48, 3.13]; P < .001). There was also an association between interest and subjects concerned of the addictive potential of opioids (aOR 4.04; 95% CI [1.52, 11.49]; P = .01) and between interest and previous use of prescribed opioid medication (aOR 6.00; 95% CI [1.59, 31.23]; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although most subjects were interested in LB, the current out-of-pocket cost of LB appears to be a barrier to patient acceptability. A lower cost option may increase the accessibility and adoption of this nonopioid analgesic for postoperative pain control in third molar extractions.