Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 110
Filtrar
1.
Semin Liver Dis ; 44(3): 394-404, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39095030

RESUMO

Gallstones are common and affect up to 20% of the general adult population and >20% of them will develop symptoms or complications of cholelithiasis. The high risk of gallbladder stone formation can be reduced by ursodeoxycholic acid in the case of significant weight reduction resulting from diet or bariatric surgery. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is indicated for symptomatic gallstones, as the risk of recurrence or complications increases over the course of the disease. Biliary colic is treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and spasmolytics; opioids can also be used in cases of severe acute pain. Acute cholecystitis represents a common complication of gallbladder stones and a cholecystectomy should be performed early electively, i.e., within 24 hours of admission to hospital. Symptomatic bile duct stones are primarily treated endoscopically. Immediate anti-infective therapy is mandatory in acute cholangitis. Although knowledge on the genetics and pathophysiology of gallstones has increased, current treatment algorithms remain predominantly invasive, based on interventional endoscopy and surgery. Future efforts should focus on novel strategies to prevent the development of gallstones.


Assuntos
Cálculos Biliares , Humanos , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Colagogos e Coleréticos/uso terapêutico
2.
Nutrients ; 16(15)2024 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39125429

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cholelithiasis is one of the more common complications following bariatric surgery. This may be related to the rapid weight loss during this period, although the exact mechanism of gallstone formation after bariatric surgery has not been fully elucidated. METHODS: The present literature review focuses on risk factors, prevention options and the impact of the gut microbiota on the development of gallbladder stones after bariatric surgery. RESULTS: A potential risk factor for the development of cholelithiasis after bariatric surgery may be changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota and bile acids. One of the bile acids-ursodeoxycholic acid-is considered to reduce the concentration of mucin proteins and thus contribute to reducing the formation of cholesterol crystals in patients with cholelithiasis. Additionally, it reduces the risk of both asymptomatic and symptomatic gallstones after bariatric surgery. Patients who developed gallstones after bariatric surgery had a higher abundance of Ruminococcus gnavus and those who did not develop cholelithiasis had a higher abundance of Lactobacillaceae and Enterobacteriaceae. CONCLUSION: The exact mechanism of gallstone formation after bariatric surgery has not yet been clarified. Research suggests that the intestinal microbiota and bile acids may have an important role in this.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Ácidos e Sais Biliares , Colelitíase , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Colelitíase/prevenção & controle , Colelitíase/etiologia , Ácidos e Sais Biliares/metabolismo , Fatores de Risco , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico
6.
Obes Surg ; 33(12): 4115-4124, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37872257

RESUMO

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess whether treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery reduces gallstone formation. A systematic literature search was performed using electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PROSPERO, Google Scholar and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry platform). RCTs without restrictions on study language, year, status of publication and patient's age were used. Pooled risk ratios were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for drug dose, duration and procedure types were performed. Sensitivity analyses and a summary of findings table were generated to assess the robustness and the level of evidence provided, respectively. Fourteen trials were included (3619 patients, 2292 in UDCA vs 1327 in control group). Procedures included SG, RYGB, OAGB, AGB and Gastroplasty. UDCA dose ranged from 300 to 1200 mg per day. Gallstone formation occurred in 19.3% (8.3% in UDCA vs 38.1% in the control group). UDCA significantly reduced the risk of gallstone formation (14 trials, 3619 patients; RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18-0.41; P < 0.001). UDCA significantly reduced the risk of symptomatic gallstone disease (6 trials, 2458 patients; RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.21-0.43; P < 0.001). No subgroup difference was found for different doses, duration and type of procedure performed. Oral UDCA treatment significantly reduces the risks of developing gallstones in postoperative bariatric patients from 38 to 8%. The use of 500 to 600 mg UDCA for 6 months is effective and should be implemented in all patients post-bariatric surgery.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Cálculos Biliares , Gastroplastia , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
7.
Surg Endosc ; 37(7): 5236-5240, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36952047

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) may be beneficial in reducing gallstone disease after bariatric surgery. The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) 2019 guidelines recommend a 6-month course of UDCA for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). This has not been adopted broadly. This study intends to assess the effect of routine UDCA administration following LSG on symptomatic gallstone disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent LSG, between 2009 and 2019, at two tertiary care centers in Atlantic Canada. At one center, UDCA 250 mg oral twice daily was routinely prescribed following LSG for 6 months to patients with an intact gallbladder. At the other center, UDCA was not prescribed. Primary and secondary outcomes were cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) rates. Compliance with and side effects of UDCA therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 751 patients were included in the study. Patients who had prior cholecystectomy or were lost to follow up were excluded. After exclusion criteria were applied, 461 patients were included for analysis: 303 in the UDCA group and 158 in the group who did not receive UDCA. Cholecystectomy rate was not significantly associated with UDCA administration, however there was a trend towards less cholecystectomy in patients who received UDCA (8.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.056). ERCP rate was significantly lower in patients who received UDCA (0.3% vs 2.5%, p = 0.031). Rate of gallstone disease requiring intervention, either cholecystectomy or ERCP, was significantly decreased in patients who received UDCA (8.9% vs 15.8%, p = 0.022). The most common barriers to compliance with UDCA were cost (45.4%) and nausea (18.1%). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate lower rates of ERCP in patients receiving routine UDCA following LSG. Our findings support the ASMBS 2019 guidelines for administering UDCA after LSG for preventing gallstone disease.


Assuntos
Cálculos Biliares , Gastrectomia , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico , Humanos , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico
8.
Lipids Health Dis ; 21(1): 109, 2022 Oct 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36303150

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hepatic caveolin-1 (CAV1) is reduced in cholesterol gallstone disease (CGD). Mice with CAV1 deficiency were prone to develop CGD. However, it remains unknown whether restored hepatic CAV1 expression prevents the development of CGD. METHODS: C57BL/6 mice were injected with adeno-associated virus 2/8 (AAV2/8) vectors carrying the CAV1 gene (AAV2/8CAV1) via intravenous (i.v.) or intraperitoneal (i.p.) route and then subjected to a lithogenic diet (LD) for 8 weeks. Uninjected mice were used as controls. The functional consequences of rescuing CAV1 expression by either i.v. or i.p. AAV2/8CAV1 treatment for CGD prevention and its subsequent molecular mechanisms were examined. RESULTS: CAV1 expression was reduced in the liver and gallbladder of LD-fed CGD mice. We discovered that AAV2/8CAV1 i.p. delivery results in higher transduction efficiency in the gallbladder than tail vein administration. Although either i.v. or i.p. injection of AAV2/8CAV1 improved liver lipid metabolic abnormalities in CGD mice but did not affect LD feeding-induced bile cholesterol supersaturation. In comparison with i.v. administration route, i.p. administration of AAV2/8CAV1 obviously increased CAV1 protein levels in the gallbladder of LD-fed mice, and i.p. delivery of AAV2/8CAV1 partially improved gallbladder cholecystokinin receptor (CCKAR) responsiveness and impeded bile cholesterol nucleation via the activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling, which induced a reduction in gallbladder mucin-1 (MUC1) and MUC5ac expression and gallbladder cholesterol accumulation. CONCLUSION: CGD prevention by i.p. AAV2/8CAV1 injection in LD-fed mice was associated with the improvement of gallbladder stasis, which again supported the notion that supersaturated bile is required but not sufficient for the formation of cholesterol gallstones. Additionally, AAV treatment via the local i.p. injection offers particular advantages over the systemic i.v. route for much more effective gallbladder gene delivery, which will be an excellent tool for conducting preclinical functional studies on the maintenance of normal gallbladder function to prevent CGD.


Assuntos
Caveolina 1 , Cálculos Biliares , Animais , Camundongos , Caveolina 1/genética , Caveolina 1/metabolismo , Colesterol/metabolismo , Colesterol na Dieta , Dependovirus/genética , Dependovirus/metabolismo , Vesícula Biliar/metabolismo , Cálculos Biliares/genética , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Fígado/metabolismo , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL
9.
Br J Surg ; 109(11): 1116-1123, 2022 10 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35979609

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) prophylaxis for the prevention of symptomatic gallstone disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients without gallstones before surgery. METHODS: Data from a multicentre, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled superiority trial were used. Patients scheduled for laparoscopic RYGB or sleeve gastrectomy were randomized to receive 900 mg UDCA or placebo for 6 months. Indicated by the clinical report, prophylactic prescription of UDCA was evaluated economically against placebo from a healthcare and societal perspective for the subgroup of patients without gallstones before surgery who underwent RYGB. Volumes and costs of in-hospital care, out-of-hospital care, out-of-pocket expenses, and productivity loss were assessed. Main outcomes were the costs per patient free from symptomatic gallstone disease and the costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). RESULTS: Patients receiving UDCA prophylaxis were more likely to remain free from symptomatic gallstone disease (relative risk 1.06, 95 per cent c.i. 1.02 to 1.11; P = 0.002) compared with patients in the placebo group. The gain in QALYs, corrected for a baseline difference in health utility, was 0.047 (95 per cent bias-corrected and accelerated (Bca) c.i. 0.007 to 0.088) higher (P = 0.022). Differences in costs were -€356 (95 per cent Bca c.i. €-1573 to 761) from a healthcare perspective and -€1392 (-3807 to 917) from a societal perspective including out-of-pocket expenses and productivity loss, both statistically non-significant, in favour of UDCA prophylaxis. The probability of UDCA prophylaxis being cost-effective was at least 0.872. CONCLUSION: UDCA prophylaxis after RYGB in patients without gallstones before surgery was cost-effective.


Assuntos
Cálculos Biliares , Derivação Gástrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico
10.
J Gastroenterol ; 57(8): 529-539, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35704084

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the incidence of gallstone formation, subsequent biliary disease and the need for cholecystectomy in untreated patients and patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) following bariatric surgery. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing UDCA and controls for the prevention of gallstone formation after bariatric surgery published until February 2022 were selected and subjected to a systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles were searched in the MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Trials Register databases. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0. RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled studies were included, with a total of 2363 randomized patients and 2217 patients analysed in the UDCA group versus 1415 randomized patients and 1257 patients analysed in the control group. Considering analysed patients, prophylactic use of UDCA was significantly associated with decreased (i) gallstone formation (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.21-0.31), (ii) symptomatic gallstone disease (GD) (OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.20-0.42) and consequently (iii) cholecystectomy rate (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.20-0.55). The results were similar in ITT analysis, in the subgroup of patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or considering only randomized versus placebo studies. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of UDCA after bariatric surgery prevents both gallstone formation and symptomatic GD and reduces the need for cholecystectomy.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Cálculos Biliares , Obesidade Mórbida , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Colecistectomia/efeitos adversos , Cálculos Biliares/epidemiologia , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico
11.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 30(6): 1170-1180, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35475596

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery increases the risk of postoperative gallstone formation. Many studies have proposed ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) as a preventive agent for postoperative gallstone formation. This study aimed to investigate the effect of UDCA on gallstone formation after bariatric surgery in patients without preoperative gallstones. METHODS: PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and EBSCO were searched for articles assessing the effect of UDCA on gallstone formation after bariatric surgery. The outcome was the incidence of postoperative gallstones. Odds ratios were used to assess dichotomous variables, and random-effects models were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies including 4,827 participants met the inclusion criteria. The statistical results showed that the incidence of gallstones in the UDCA group was significantly lower than in the control group. Furthermore, the occurrence of symptomatic gallstones and cholecystectomy was significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: In patients without preoperative gallstones, UDCA can effectively prevent the formation of gallstones after bariatric surgery. In addition, UDCA can significantly reduce the occurrence of symptomatic gallstones and the risk of postoperative cholecystectomy. Doses of 500 to 600 mg/d can be used as a measure to prevent postoperative gallstone formation.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Cálculos Biliares , Obesidade Mórbida , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Cálculos Biliares/epidemiologia , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Incidência , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Período Pós-Operatório , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico
12.
Asian J Surg ; 45(12): 2664-2669, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35232647

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gall stone disease was known to increase after bariatric surgery. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) might reduce the gallstone formation rate after bariatric surgery. However, other option for gallstone prevention was unclear. We reported the result of a randomized trial comparing the gallstone prevention efficacy of probiotics and digestive enzyme versus UDCA. METHODS: This prospective, randomized trial was held in an institute of Taiwan. Patients were eligible for inclusion if their body-mass index (BMI) was 32.5 kg/m2 or higher with the presence of comorbidity, or 27.5 kg/mw or higher with not-well controlled type 2 diabetes, and were aged 18-65 years. Participant were randomized assigned (1:1:1) to probiotic, digestive enzyme or UDCA. The primary endpoint was assessed in the incidence of gallstone disease at 6 months after surgery. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. number NCT03247101, and is now completed. RESULTS: From January 2016 to December 2018, of 186 patients screened for eligibility, 152 were randomly assigned to probiotic (52) or digestive enzyme (52) or UDCA (52). In the per-protocol population, mean age was 35.9 years (SD 10.6), mean BMI was 40.3 kg/m2 (SD 6.9), 57(58.2%) were female. After 6 months, the incidence of gall bladder diseased was 15.2%, in the probiotics group, 17.6% in UDCA group and 29.1% in digestive enzyme groups, confirming non-inferiority of probiotic (p = 0.38). Female gender was identified as a risk factor for gall bladder disease after bariatric surgery (odds ratio = 4.61, 95% confidence interval = 1.05, 20.3, p = 0.04). The poor drug compliance rate was 19.5%, 22.7% and 26.2% in probiotics, UDCA and digestive enzyme group respectively. UDCA group had a higher drug adverse effect than probiotic group (15.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Probiotic is not inferior to UDCA regarding gall bladder disease prevention after bariatric surgery at 6 months.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Cálculos Biliares , Obesidade Mórbida , Probióticos , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Probióticos/uso terapêutico
13.
Obes Surg ; 32(4): 1270-1278, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35143012

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patients who undergo bariatric surgery are at risk for developing cholesterol gallstones. We aimed to identify risk factors that are associated with symptomatic gallstone disease and gallstone formation after bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included participants of the UPGRADE trial, a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial on the prevention of symptomatic gallstone disease with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) after bariatric surgery. The association between patient characteristics and symptomatic gallstone disease, and gallstone formation was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 959 patients, 78 (8%) developed symptomatic gallstone disease within 24 months. Risk factors were the presence of a pain syndrome (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.03 to 4.17) and asymptomatic gallstones before surgery (OR 3.15; 95% CI 1.87 to 5.33). Advanced age (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.93 to 0.97) was protective, and UDCA prophylaxis did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.03). No risk factors were identified for gallstone formation, whereas advanced age (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.00), statin use (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.90), and UDCA prophylaxis (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.73) all reduced the risk. CONCLUSION: Young patients with a preoperative pain syndrome and/or asymptomatic gallstones before bariatric surgery are at increased risk for symptomatic gallstone disease after surgery. Whether statins, either alone or in combination with UDCA prophylaxis, can further reduce the burden of gallstones after bariatric surgery should be investigated prospectively.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Cálculos Biliares , Obesidade Mórbida , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Cálculos Biliares/epidemiologia , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico
14.
Nutrients ; 14(2)2022 Jan 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35057580

RESUMO

The objective of the present research was to review the state of the art on the consequences of drinking coffee at the different levels of the gastrointestinal tract. At some steps of the digestive process, the effects of coffee consumption seem rather clear. This is the case for the stimulation of gastric acid secretion, the stimulation of biliary and pancreatic secretion, the reduction of gallstone risk, the stimulation of colic motility, and changes in the composition of gut microbiota. Other aspects are still controversial, such as the possibility for coffee to affect gastro-esophageal reflux, peptic ulcers, and intestinal inflammatory diseases. This review also includes a brief summary on the lack of association between coffee consumption and cancer of the different digestive organs, and points to the powerful protective effect of coffee against the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. This review reports the available evidence on different topics and identifies the areas that would most benefit from additional studies.


Assuntos
Café , Trato Gastrointestinal , Bile/fisiologia , Cafeína/administração & dosagem , Café/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Ácido Gástrico/fisiologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Motilidade Gastrointestinal , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais , Trato Gastrointestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Masculino , Pâncreas/fisiologia , Úlcera Péptica , Saliva/enzimologia
15.
Surg Endosc ; 36(9): 6396-6402, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35020052

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for cholelithiasis. Besides, rapid weight loss after bariatric surgery upsurges the rate of cholelithiasis and acute cholecystitis. This study aimed to compare gallstone development frequency after LSG under ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) prophylaxis. METHODS: This prospective controlled study included 332 patients scheduled for LSG randomized to receive 500 mg UDCA daily for 12 months (UDCA Group) or no treatment (Control Group). Ultrasonography was done 6 and 12 months after surgery to detect gallstones. Cholecystectomy was done for complicated cases of cholelithiasis. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were lost to follow-up, and 3 developed severe adverse effects of UDCA and excluded. Data are presented for 130 patients in the UDCA group and 128 in the Control group. Collectively, 11 patients (8.5%) of the UDCA group and 41 (32.0%) of the Control group developed gall stones during the first postoperative year (p < 0.001). Cholecystectomy was indicated in 3 patients (2.3%) of the UDCA group and 9 (7.0%) of the Control group (p = 0.072). On multivariate analysis, higher BMI, dyslipidemia, and lacking UDCA prophylaxis were the independent factors significantly associated with stone development. Also, stone development was associated with higher weight loss after 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: UDCA 500 mg once daily for 12 months after LSG is effective in reducing gallstone formation at 1 year. UDCA administration reduced the frequency of cholecystectomies from 7 to 2.3%. High BMI and dyslipidemia are the independent preoperative factors significantly associated with stone development.


Assuntos
Cálculos Biliares , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Redução de Peso
16.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 18(1): 77-84, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34772614

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a bile acid that has been shown to reduce the formation of gallstones after significant weight loss. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of UDCA on the incidence of gallstones after bariatric surgery. SETTINGS: An electronic search of PubMed (Medline), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies (CENTRAL), Scopus (Elsevier) databases, EMBASE, CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Web of Science. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials was performed. The primary outcome was the incidence of gallstones after bariatric surgery. Secondary outcomes included type of operation and time interval to and characteristics associated with gallstone formation. RESULTS: Ten randomized control trials including 2583 patients were included, 1772 patients (68.6%) receiving UDCA and 811 (31.4%) receiving placebo. There was a significant reduction in gallstone formation in patients who received UDCA postoperatively (risk ratio [RR] .36, 95% confidence interval [CI] .22-.41, P < .00001). The overall prevalence of gallstone formation was 24.7% in the control group compared to 7.3% in the UDCA group. A dose of ≤600 mg/day had a significantly reduced risk of gallstone formation compared to the placebo group (risk ratio .35; 95% CI .24-.53; P < .001). The risk reduction was not significant for the higher dose (>600 mg/day) group (risk ratio .30; 95% CI, .09-1.01, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: UDCA significantly reduces the risk of both asymptomatic and symptomatic gallstones after bariatric surgery. A dose of 600 mg/day is associated with improved compliance and better outcomes regardless of type of surgery. UDCA should be considered part of a standard postoperative care bundle after bariatric surgery.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Cálculos Biliares , Obesidade Mórbida , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Cálculos Biliares/epidemiologia , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Redução de Peso
17.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ; 28(5): 409-418, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33768730

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Patients who undergo gastric surgery are prone to form postsurgical gallstones. Debates still exist about the need for prevention and the selection of preventive methods. No studies had been reported comparing the efficacy of prophylactic ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and prophylactic cholecystectomy (PC) for lowering postsurgical gallstone formation and subsequent cholecystectomy (SC) in patients who have undergone gastric surgery. METHODS: We did a systematic review to identify studies from PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database through 30 June 2020. We conducted direct and indirect comparisons of each prophylaxis using conventional and network meta-analysis. Studies with patients who have no history of cholecystectomy and who have not had preoperative gallstone were included. RESULTS: The excellent preventive effects of PC and UDCA were demonstrated for gallstone formation (odds ratio [OR] 0.05, [95% CI 0.01, 0.22] and 0.20, [95% CI 0.16, 0.24], respectively) and the need for SC (OR 0.10, [95% CI 0.02, 0.57] and OR 0.22, [95% CI 0.14, 0.35], respectively) than control group. The UDCA group showed a tendency to generate more gallstones (OR 3.74, [95% CI 0.88, 15.82]) and a greater need for SC (OR 2.19, [95% CI 0.47-10.14]) than did the PC group without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis for gallstone formation may be needed for patients who undergo gastric surgery to reduce troublesome morbidities. Prophylactic UDCA seems to be a reasonable preventive method for postsurgical gallstone formation to ensure clinical benefit while reducing the burden of subsequent cholecystectomy for the patient as compared to a PC.


Assuntos
Cálculos Biliares , Obesidade Mórbida , Colecistectomia , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico
18.
Gastric Cancer ; 24(1): 232-244, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32705445

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Injury to the vagus nerve has been proposed to be associated with occurrence of gallstones after gastrectomy. We investigated the effect of preservation of hepatic branch of the vagus nerve on prevention of gallstones during laparoscopic distal (LDG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LPPG). METHODS: Preservation of the vagus nerve was reviewed of cT1N0M0 gastric cancer patients underwent LDG (n = 323) and LPPG (n = 144) during 2016-2017. Presence of gallstones was evaluated by ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT). Incidences of gallstones were compared between the nerve preserved (h-DG, h-PPG) group and sacrificed (s-DG, s-PPG) group. Clinicopathological features were also compared. RESULTS: The 3-year cumulative incidence of gallstones was lower in the h-DG (2.7%, n = 85) than the s-DG (14.6%, n = 238) (p = 0.017) and lower in the h-PPG (1.6%, n = 123) than the s-PPG (12.9%, n = 21) (p = 0.004). Overall postoperative complication rate was similar between the h-DG and s-DG (p = 0.861) as well as between the h-PPG and s-PPG (p = 0.768). The number of retrieved lymph nodes station #1 and 3-year recurrence-free survival were not significantly different between the preserved group and sacrificed group. Injury to the vagus nerve (p = 0.001) and high body mass index (BMI) (≥ 27.5 kg/m2) (p = 0.040) were found to be independent risk factors of gallstone formation in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of hepatic branch of the vagus nerve can be recommended for LDG as well as LPPG of early gastric cancer patients to reduce postoperative gallstone formation.


Assuntos
Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Gastrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Piloro/cirurgia , Nervo Vago/cirurgia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Cálculos Biliares/epidemiologia , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Fígado/inervação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Traumatismos do Nervo Vago/etiologia , Traumatismos do Nervo Vago/prevenção & controle
19.
Acta Chir Belg ; 121(2): 109-114, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33252027

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is a critical risk factor for cholelithiasis. This study aimed to investigate the role of treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the prevention of gallstone formation after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in morbidly obese patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent SG for morbid obesity from January 2016 to September 2016 were evaluated. Patients without hepatobiliary disorders were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they did (Group I) or did not receive treatment with UDCA (Group II). Indication for UDCA treatment was symptomatic alkaline reflux. Demographic characteristics, comorbid diseases, preoperative blood parameters, early and late period weight loss rates, and gallstone development were monitored and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Ninety-six of 155 patients met the inclusion criteria. Group I and II included 49 and 47 patients, respectively. The mean age was 39.1 ± 10.8 (range 18-69) years and the mean follow-up period was 20.75 ± 6.6 (range 12-34) months. Gallstone formation was significantly lower in Group I compared to Group II [5 patients (10.2%) vs. 21 patients (44.6%), p<.001]. Moreover, the absence of UDCA treatment was independently and significantly associated with gallstone formation (hazard ratio: 3.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.73-5.50; p<.001) in multivariate analyses. There was no difference in weight loss rates between the two groups at the early or late periods. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with UDCA seems to be effective in the prevention of gallstone formation after sleeve gastrectomy. Furthermore, early and late period weight loss rates were not found to have significant effects on the risk of cholelithiasis.


Assuntos
Cálculos Biliares , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Pré-Escolar , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Lactente , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico
20.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 11: 578536, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33281743

RESUMO

There are gender differences between men and women in many physiological functions and diseases, which indicates that female sex hormones may be important. Traditionally, estrogen exerts its biological activities by activating two classical nuclear estrogen receptors, ESR1 and ESR2. However, the roles of estrogen in the regulation of physiological functions and the pathogenesis of diseases become more complicated with the identification of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER1). Although many GPER1-specific ligands have been developed, the therapeutic mechanisms of exclusively targeting GPER1 are not yet well understood. Translational applications and clinical trial efforts for the identified GPER1 ligands have been focused primarily on the reproductive, cardiovascular, nervous, endocrine, and immune systems. More recently, research found that GPER1 may play an important role in regulating the digestive system. Cholesterol gallstone disease, a major biliary disease, has a higher prevalence in women than in men worldwide. Emerging evidence implies that GPER1 could play an important role, independent of the classical ESR1, in the pathophysiology of cholesterol gallstones in women. This review discusses the complex signaling pathways of three estrogen receptors, highlights the development of GPER1-specific ligands, and summarizes the latest advances in the role of GPER1 in the pathogenesis of gallstone formation.


Assuntos
Colesterol/metabolismo , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Receptores de Estrogênio/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/antagonistas & inibidores , Cálculos Biliares/metabolismo , Cálculos Biliares/patologia , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA